这是indexloc提供的服务,不要输入任何密码
Skip to content

Conversation

@jstucke
Copy link
Collaborator

@jstucke jstucke commented Feb 4, 2025

@jstucke jstucke requested a review from dorpvom February 4, 2025 14:55
@jstucke jstucke self-assigned this Feb 4, 2025
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Feb 4, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 91.65%. Comparing base (ec75077) to head (ca4c968).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1341      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   91.65%   91.65%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         374      374              
  Lines       21050    21048       -2     
==========================================
- Hits        19294    19292       -2     
  Misses       1756     1756              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Copy link
Collaborator

@euwint euwint left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The changes definitely make sense.
Splitting up the show_analysis.html also provides a clearer overview.
However, I still have some change requests:

  • Could the plugins in the comment dropdown also be sorted alphabetically?
  • The information about the author of the comment is currently lost. I think it would be interesting to have information about the author and the creation time of the comment. Therefore, the information should also appear in the table
  • Perhaps part of another pull request, but a comment function on the firmware comparison page also seems useful to me
  • Also perhaps part of another pull request, but in the comment info on the start page, it might be useful to include information about the firmware for which the comment was left.

@jstucke
Copy link
Collaborator Author

jstucke commented May 16, 2025

The information about the author of the comment is currently lost. I think it would be interesting to have information about the author and the creation time of the comment. Therefore, the information should also appear in the table

The information is actually still there: You can see it when you hover over the comment with your mouse

@jstucke jstucke force-pushed the plugin-comments branch 2 times, most recently from 4004174 to 5ee27d4 Compare May 16, 2025 16:12
Copy link
Collaborator

@euwint euwint left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good now :)

@jstucke jstucke force-pushed the plugin-comments branch from 1e63162 to ca4c968 Compare May 21, 2025 06:57
@jstucke jstucke merged commit 67fc927 into master May 21, 2025
9 of 10 checks passed
@jstucke jstucke deleted the plugin-comments branch May 21, 2025 08:42
@jstucke
Copy link
Collaborator Author

jstucke commented May 21, 2025

Failed CI build is fixed in #1369

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants