WO2018139547A1

WO2018139547A1 - Instructor subject-specific instruction ability analysis system

Info

Publication number: WO2018139547A1
Application number: PCT/JP2018/002312
Authority: WO
Inventors: 柴田　仁
Original assignee: 東京書籍株式会社
Priority date: 2017-01-26
Filing date: 2018-01-25
Publication date: 2018-08-02

Abstract

[Problem] To quantitatively analyze the instruction ability of a teacher objectively over time, even when children or students are not enrolled in the same class due to class changes and the like. [Solution] In the present invention, examination results are analyzed for each topic and for each child, said examination results being obtained via an academic examination which is carried out intermittently regarding multiple topics and is administered to multiple examinees, and the instruction ability of the teacher responsible for the subject is analyzed. The present invention is equipped with: an examination results database 31 that stores, for all the children in a country, item data that includes the year of the academic examination, an identification number of the examinee, the academic year and class of the examinee, an examination result for each topic, and the teacher for each topic; a statistical processing means 32 that statistically processes the item data with respect to a change over time in the examination results for each subject and for each teacher; a visualization data output means 33 that outputs visualization data enabling the change over time in the examination results for each designated teacher to be visualized; and an image output unit 40 that outputs the visualization data as an image.

Description

Leadership analysis system for each subject

The present invention relates to a system for analyzing the leadership of a leader by subject.

のため In order to support education, the teaching ability of the teacher is analyzed objectively, and the teaching ability of the teacher is improved based on the analysis result. Here, the teaching ability of a teacher can be estimated by how much the scholastic ability of children and students has changed over time. That is, if the academic ability improves over time, it is judged that the teaching ability is good, and conversely, if the academic ability decreases, it is judged that the teaching ability is inferior. For this reason, it is effective to obtain the results of academic ability surveys conducted on the students and students who are in charge of the focused teacher, as deviation values for each subject, and analyze them over time.

A system has been proposed in which children, their grades, etc. are acquired and educational support is based on them. Patent Document 1 includes a status item receiving unit that receives an item of a situation in which education has been performed, an introspection item receiving unit that receives an internal observation item of an educated person in the received status, and a future change in the situation Reform item accepting means for accepting items, digitizing means for digitizing the items accepted by each accepting means as situation grasping ability, introspection analysis ability, and reform predicting ability, and visualizing and outputting the digitized values And an educator support system including an output means.

JP 2014-215571 A

However, the students and students who are in charge of one teacher are not always the same every year. That is, the student who is in charge of one teacher fluctuates by annual class change, teacher transfer, and student transfer.

For this reason, it is difficult to objectively analyze the teaching ability of teachers. Further, since the invention described in Patent Document 1 cannot be analyzed for each teacher, the individual teaching ability of the teacher cannot be analyzed.

The present invention has been made in view of the above-described problems. Even if a student or a student is not enrolled in the same class due to class change or the like, the teaching ability of the teacher is quantitatively evaluated over time and objectively. The purpose is to provide a leadership analysis system for each subject that can be analyzed.

The invention according to claim 1, which solves the above problem, is a survey in each subject of each of the survey subjects acquired in an academic ability survey targeting a large number of survey subjects conducted continuously for a plurality of subjects. Analyzing the results and analyzing the leadership of the instructor in charge of each subject of the survey subject, for all the survey subjects, the academic achievement survey year, the survey subject identification number, A survey result database storing item data including the survey result and class of the subject to be surveyed, the survey result by subject, and the instructor by subject, and the instructor in each subject for each item of the item data Statistical processing means for statistically processing the secular change of the survey results of the survey subject in charge of the survey, and the survey for each designated instructor based on the output of the statistical processing means A teaching data analysis according to a subject subject, comprising: visualization data output means for outputting visualization data capable of visualizing the secular change of the survey results of an elephant; and image output means for outputting the visualization data as an image. System.
According to the present invention, in the survey result database, academic achievement survey years for a large number of survey subjects, identification numbers of survey subjects, grades and classes of survey subjects, survey results by subject, and instruction by subject Item data including the name of the instructor is stored, and the statistical processing means statistically processes and visualizes the item data stored in the survey result database over time for the survey results of the survey subjects who were instructed by the instructor in each subject. The data output means outputs visualization data that visualizes the secular change of the survey result of the survey subject for the designated instructor based on the output of the statistical processing means, and the image output means outputs an image from the visualization data.
Therefore, from the visualization data from the output means, it is possible to quantitatively and visually grasp the trends over time of the survey results of the survey subjects in the subjects instructed by the instructor, and from this, the instructor's leadership can be analyzed objectively. .

Similarly, in the invention according to claim 2, the statistical processing means calculates all of the survey subjects from the survey results of each subject of all the survey subjects from the item data stored in the survey result database. The deviation value of each subject is processed.
According to the present invention, the statistical processing means calculates the deviation value of each subject of each survey subject from the survey results of each subject of all survey subjects.
Therefore, the survey result of the survey subject can be statistically processed, and the leadership of the leader can be analyzed quantitatively and objectively.

Similarly, the invention described in claim 3 is characterized by comprising an input means for inputting the item data into the survey result database.
According to the present invention, item data can be input to the survey result database from the input means.
Therefore, item data can be stored and corrected in the survey result database at a desired time.

Similarly, in the invention according to claim 4, the survey result database stores the item data in a predetermined format, and the input means is stored in the survey result database stored in another device. Data conversion means for converting the item data in a format different from the data format into a format for storing the item data in the survey result database is provided.
According to the present invention, the data conversion means converts item data in a format different from the storage format of the survey result database.
Therefore, item data of other formats can be easily stored in the survey result database.

Similarly, in the invention according to claim 5, the visualization data output means outputs the visualization data in a graph or a table format that displays a secular change of the deviation value of the survey subject for the designated instructor. Features.
According to the present invention, the visualized data output means outputs image data of a graph or a table in which the change over time of the deviation value of the survey subject is displayed for each instructor.
Therefore, the secular change of the deviation value of the survey subject can be visualized as image data of a graph or a table.

Similarly, in the invention according to claim 6, the instructor is an elementary school teacher, and a change over time of a deviation value of each subject of a child who is the subject of the survey that the instructor is in charge of, or a change in one year. The visualization data for displaying is output.
According to the present invention, the instructor is an elementary school teacher, and the visualization data output means displays the change over time and the change in one year of the deviation value of each subject of the child who is the subject of the survey. The visualization data to be output is output.
Therefore, it is possible to visualize the secular change of each subject of the student by the instructor in the elementary school and the change in one year as image data.

Similarly, in the invention according to claim 7, the instructor is a junior high school teacher, and the visualization data output means is for each class to which the student who is the subject of the survey belongs for the subject in charge of the instructor. The visualization data displaying the change over time of the deviation value or the change over one year is output.
According to the present invention, the instructor is a junior high school teacher, and the visualization data output means displays the change over time and the change over the course of one year of each class of the student who is the subject of the survey. The visualization data to be output is output.
Therefore, it is possible to visualize the secular change of each subject of the student and the change in one year as image data in the junior high school.

Similarly, in the invention according to claim 8, the visualization data output means displays, for each instructor, a change value of the deviation value of the survey subject in each subject in charge for the selected one or more instructors. The visualization data to be displayed in a format is output.
According to the present invention, for one or a plurality of the selected leaders, the change value of the deviation value of the survey subject in each subject in charge is displayed in tabular form for each leader.
Therefore, the teaching ability according to subject in each subject of each leader can be evaluated.

Similarly, in the invention according to claim 9, the visualization data output means, for the selected one or a plurality of the leaders, performs a plurality of stages of change of the deviation value of the survey subject in each subject in charge of the leaders. The visualization data to be displayed with the evaluation result is output.
According to the present invention, for one or a plurality of the selected leaders, the change in the deviation value of the survey subject in each subject in charge is displayed in multiple stages of evaluation.
Therefore, the teaching ability according to subject in each subject of each leader can be evaluated at a glance.

Similarly, the invention described in claim 10 is characterized in that the output means is an image display device or a printing device.
According to the present invention, the image data is displayed on the image display device or printed on a medium from the printing device and output.
Therefore, desired image data can be displayed at an arbitrary time, and the image data can be printed and stored on a printed medium.

Similarly, the invention described in claim 11 is characterized in that the graph is a line graph or a bar graph showing a change in the deviation value of each subject for each instructor.
According to the present invention, the secular change of the deviation value of each subject is displayed as a line graph or a bar graph.
Therefore, it is possible to easily grasp the secular change of the deviation value of each subject as a quantitative visualization.

According to the leadership subject-specific leadership analysis system according to the present invention, it is possible to objectively grasp the teacher's leadership quantitatively and visually even if the student is changed to a different class due to class change or the like. From now on, the leadership ability of leaders can be analyzed objectively.

That is, according to the leadership subject-specific leadership analysis system according to claim 1, the survey result database includes a year of academic ability survey for a large number of survey subjects, identification numbers of survey subjects, grades of survey subjects, and Item data including class, subject-specific survey results, and subject-specific instructor names are stored, and statistical processing means are subject items surveyed by instructors in each subject for the item data stored in the survey result database. The statistical data processing of the person's survey results, and the visualization data output means, based on the output of the statistical processing means, outputs image data that visualizes the aging of the survey results of the surveyed subject for the specified instructor, Since the image output means outputs the image data, the trend over time of the survey results of the survey subjects in the subjects instructed by the instructor is quantitatively determined from the image data from the output means. One visually can be grasped, it can objectively analyze the leadership of the leaders in the future.

In addition, according to the leadership subject-specific leadership analysis system according to claim 2, the statistical processing means computes the deviation value of each subject of each survey subject from the survey results of each subject of all survey subjects. The survey results of the survey subjects can be processed statistically, and the leadership ability of the leader can be analyzed quantitatively and objectively.

Further, according to the leadership subject-specific leadership analysis system according to claim 3, item data can be input from the input means to the survey result database, so that the item data is stored and corrected in the survey result database at a desired time. Can do.

Further, according to the leadership subject-specific leadership analysis system according to claim 4, the data conversion means converts the item data in a format different from the storage format of the survey result database. Can easily be stored in the survey results database.

Further, according to the leadership subject-specific leadership analysis system according to claim 5, the visualization data output means outputs image data in which the variation of the deviation value of the survey subject for each leader is displayed as a graph or a table. Therefore, the secular change of the deviation value of the survey subject can be visualized as image data.

Moreover, according to the leadership subject-specific leadership analysis system according to claim 6, the leader is an elementary school teacher, and the visualization data output means is for each subject of the child who is the subject of the survey conducted by the leader. The visualization data for displaying the secular change of the deviation value and the change in one year are output. Therefore, it is possible to visualize the secular change of each subject of the student by the instructor in the elementary school and the change in one year as image data.

In addition, according to the leadership subject-specific leadership analysis system according to claim 7, the leader is a junior high school teacher, and the visualization data output means is for each class of the student who is the survey subject in charge of the leader. The visualization data for displaying the secular change of the deviation value and the change in one year are output. Therefore, it is possible to visualize the secular change of each subject of the student and the change in one year as image data in the junior high school.

Similarly, according to the leadership subject-specific leadership analysis system according to claim 8, for each of the selected one or more leaders, the change value of the deviation value of the survey subject in each subject in charge is determined for each leader. Is displayed in tabular form. Therefore, the teaching ability according to subject in each subject of each leader can be evaluated.

In addition, according to the leadership subject-specific leadership analysis system according to claim 9, for one or more selected leaders, the change in the deviation value of the survey subject in each subject in charge is evaluated in multiple stages. Is displayed. Therefore, the teaching ability according to subject in each subject of each leader can be evaluated at a glance.

Further, according to the leadership subject-specific leadership analysis system according to claim 10, the image data is displayed on the image display device or printed on the medium from the printing device and output, so that the desired image data can be arbitrarily set. Can be displayed at the time of printing, and the image data can be printed and stored on a printed medium.

According to the leadership subject-specific leadership analysis system according to claim 11, the secular change of the deviation value of each subject is displayed as a line graph or a bar graph. Therefore, the secular change of the deviation value of each subject can be easily performed. I can grasp it.

It is a block diagram which shows the structure of the guidance subject analysis system classified by leader subject which concerns on embodiment of this invention. It is a flowchart which shows the flow of a process of the leadership ability analysis system according to the leader subject. The basic processing of the leadership subject-specific leadership analysis system will be described. (A) is a diagram showing the transition of classification of children, and (b) is a graph showing the survey results of each subject. FIG. 5 shows the results of a survey of each subject by the leadership subject-specific leadership analysis system, in which (a) is a line graph for A teacher and (b) is a line graph for B teacher. It is a bar graph which shows the change of the YoY change according to the teacher by the leadership analysis system according to the subject subject. It is a bar graph which shows the change of a year-on-year change of each subject for every teacher by the leadership ability analysis system according to the leader subject. It is a graph which shows scholastic ability transition of each subject of the class which the A teacher in the elementary school was in charge of by the leadership analysis system according to the subject subject. It is a graph which shows the academic ability transition of the English class which A teacher in junior high school was in charge of by the leadership analysis system according to the leader subject. It is a table | surface which shows the teaching power of each subject according to the elementary school teacher by the leadership analysis system by the leader subject.

A description will be given of a leadership subject-specific leadership analysis system according to a mode for carrying out the present invention. FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing a configuration of a leadership subject-specific leadership analysis system according to an embodiment of the present invention, and FIG. 2 is a flowchart showing a processing flow of the leader subject-specific leadership analysis system. The leadership subject-specific leadership analysis system according to the present embodiment is applied to a case where one teacher teaches Japanese language, arithmetic, science, and society in each group in an elementary school.

The leadership subject-specific leadership analysis system 10 includes an input unit 20, a processing unit 30, and an image output unit 40 that is an image output unit. In this leadership subject-specific leadership analysis system 10, the input unit 20 and the processing unit 30 are arranged in a plurality of elementary schools that employ the leader subject-specific leadership analysis system 10, the processing unit 30 is placed in a processing center, The input unit 20 and the image output unit 40 are connected to the processing unit 30 via a network such as the Internet. The input unit 20 and the image output unit 40 are realized by a computer arranged in each elementary school, and the processing unit 30 is realized by a computer arranged in a processing center.

Computers installed in each elementary school have a CPU (Central Processing Unit) as a processing unit, a RAM (Random Access Memory), a ROM (Read Only Memory) as a main storage device, a HDD (Hard Disc Drive) as an auxiliary storage device, and an SSD (Solid). State Drive) is implemented, and the function of each processing unit described later is realized by executing with the application software in the seed control unit.

First, the input unit 20 and the image output unit 40 will be described. The input unit 20 includes an input unit 21 such as a keyboard and a mouse, a display unit 22 such as a liquid crystal display, and a data storage unit 23. A survey result 51 is input from the input unit 20 and sent to the processing unit 30. The data storage means 23 stores data in the data format of the survey results used by the processing unit 30 and data in a format different from this data format, for example, data adopted in spreadsheet software. .

The survey result data stored in the data storage means 23 is sent to the processing unit 30 for processing, and the result is sent to the image output unit 40 for display and output. As described above, the input unit 20 and the image output unit 40 are realized by the same computer.

The image output unit 40 includes a printing unit 41 that is a printing device and a display unit 42 such as a liquid crystal display that is an image display device. From the image output unit 40, the processing result 52 of the processing unit 30 is output as a table or a graph. That is, the printing unit 41 outputs the processing result 52 as a printed matter, and the display unit 42 outputs the processing result 52 as a screen display. Here, since the input unit 20 and the image output unit 40 are realized by the same computer, the display unit 42 of the image output unit 40 and the display unit 22 of the input unit 20 can be the same.

Next, the processing unit 30 will be described. The processing unit 30 includes a survey result database 31, a statistical processing unit 32, a visualization data output unit 33, and a data conversion unit 34. The survey result database 31 stores survey result data sent from a school that employs the leadership subject-specific leadership analysis system 10.

The statistical processing means 32 statistically processes the survey result data stored in the survey result database 31 and outputs quantitative data obtained by quantifying the leadership of each leader. The visualization data output unit 33 outputs image data for displaying a table, a graph, and the like based on the quantitative data from the statistical processing unit 32. The data conversion means 34 converts the survey result data in another format sent from the input unit 20 of each school into a format that can be stored in the survey result database 31.

Here, the survey result data will be explained. Each elementary school conducts academic achievement surveys regularly, for example, once a year. Scholastic ability surveys are conducted nationwide or in a wide area, and many children take examinations at many elementary schools. This ensures the objectivity of the survey.

Scholastic ability survey is conducted continuously for 9 years, for example, from 1st to 6th grade in elementary school and from 1st to 3rd grade in middle school. Survey items (subjects) are conducted for Japanese language, mathematics, science, and society for elementary schools, and for national language, mathematics, English, science, and society for junior high schools.

In this leadership analysis system by subject, the results of the survey include the year of the academic achievement survey, the child being surveyed, the name of the student, the unique identification number, the school name, the grade, the class (class), and the department. The item name is the name of the person (teacher, teacher) and the basic points in the survey of each subject. The statistical processing means 32 calculates a deviation value with an average of 50 for each subject in each grade and adds it to the item data of the survey result database 31.

Further, the statistical processing means 32 outputs the secular change of the deviation value of the survey subject who is in charge of each instructor for each subject for each instructor designated from the item data stored in the survey result database 31. The instructor to be output is designated from the input unit 20.

A processing flow of the leadership subject-specific leadership analysis system 10 will be described. FIG. 2 is a flowchart showing the flow of processing of the leadership subject-specific leadership analysis system.
First, a survey result is input from the input unit 20 (step SA). This investigation result is continuously performed for each fiscal year (n, n + 1, n + 2,...) (Steps SA1, SA2, SA3,...). The input is made for each child in every school about the school name, grade, class, instructor of each subject, and raw point (KP) of each subject in each school year. At this time, the format of the data may be the format of the spreadsheet software used in each school in addition to the format handled by the survey result database 31 of the processing unit 30. In this case, the data conversion means 34 of the processing unit 30 performs predetermined data conversion.

Next, statistical processing (step SB) is performed by the processing unit 30. First, the survey result data from the input unit 20 is stored in the survey result database 31 (step SB1). Data in other formats is subjected to predetermined data conversion by the data conversion means 34 and stored in the survey result database 31.

Next, the statistical processing means 32 calculates the deviation value (KD) of each subject for all children (step SB2). The deviation value is calculated with the average of the survey targets as 50. This result is stored in the survey result database 31.
Further, the survey result database 31 obtains a deviation value change of the survey result of the child in each subject for each instructor from the survey result data including the stored deviation value (step SB3).

Then, the visualization data output means 33 outputs the deviation value change of the survey result of the child in each subject for each instructor outputted by the statistical processing means 32 as data that can display a table or a graph. This visualization data is sent to the image output unit 40 in response to a request from the image output unit 40 realized by a computer arranged in each elementary school, for example, a request specifying a leader name.

The image output unit 40 performs output processing (step SC). That is, graphs, tables, etc. are output as printed matter from the printing means 41 (step SC1), and graphs, tables, etc. are displayed on the display means 42 (step SC2). Thereby, in each subject about the designated leader, the secular change of the survey result of the examinee who was in charge of the leader is visualized and outputted, and the leadership of the leader can be objectively determined.

Next, a specific example of processing of the leadership subject-specific leadership analysis system will be described. Fig. 3 explains the basic processing of the leadership analysis system for each instructor's subject, (a) shows the transition of classification of children, and (b) shows the survey results for each subject. 4 shows the survey results of each subject using the leadership subject-specific leadership analysis system. (A) is a line graph for Teacher A, (b) is a line graph for Teacher B, and FIG. 6 is a bar graph showing the change in the ratio of each subject for each teacher by the leadership analysis system by the same subject. is there.

As shown in FIG. 3 (a), 12 children A to P are divided into 4 groups (1 group to 4 groups). In the 5th grade of 2014, children A, B, C and D in one set, children E, F, G and H in two sets, children I, J, K and L in three sets and children in four sets M, N, O, P are enrolled.

Each child is a 4th grade student in FY2013. One set includes children A, I, C, and G; two sets include children E, D, P, and H; three sets include children J, F, M, and L; Children N, K, O, and B were enrolled in four groups.
Furthermore, in the 2012 3rd year students, one set includes children A, I, N, and G; two sets include children E, D, P, and L; three sets include children J, F, M, and C; four sets Children H, K, O, and B were enrolled.

These distributions were changed by class change. In addition, 1 teacher is A teacher, 2 teacher is B teacher, 3 teacher is C teacher, 4 teacher is D teacher and is in charge of Japanese language, mathematics, science and society. And Looking at this situation for each child, some of the teachers changed each year, while others did not change.

Investigate survey results in each of these years. Here, looking at the children A, B, C, and D in the fifth year of FY2014, in the fourth year of FY2013, the children A and C are one set (A teacher), the child D is two sets (B teacher), Child B was 4 groups (D teacher). Similarly, in the third year of 2012, child A was 1 set (A teacher), child D was 2 sets (B teacher), child C was 3 sets (C teacher), and child B was 4 sets (D teacher). It was.

Looking at the survey results, as shown in Fig. 3 (a) and Fig. 4 (a), the survey results of children A, B, C, and D are not significantly different from those of other subjects. It can be seen that the ability of Japanese language has improved greatly since I became a senior. From this, it can be determined that the teaching ability for the language of A teacher is good.

Similarly, looking at the teacher B, who was in charge of the 2nd class in FY2014, as shown in Fig. 4 (b), it can be seen that the mathematics has increased and the national language has decreased. From this, it can be determined that the teaching ability of the B teacher is good but the teaching ability of the Japanese language is not good.

Furthermore, looking at the teaching ability of Japanese language for A teacher, B teacher, C teacher, and D teacher, as shown in Fig. 5, A teacher is superior and B teacher is insufficient as compared with the previous year of deviation value. I understand that.

Furthermore, as shown in FIG. 6, in addition to Japanese language, the teaching ability of A teacher, B teacher, C teacher, and D teacher can be displayed as a graph for arithmetic, science, and society. From FIG. 6, the subjects that should improve the teaching ability for each teacher are clear.

Next, another specific example of processing of the leadership subject-specific leadership analysis system will be described. Fig. 7 is a graph showing the transition of academic ability of each subject of the class that A teacher in elementary school was in charge of using the leadership analysis system by the same subject, and Fig. 8 is in charge of A teacher in junior high school using the leadership analysis system by the same subject. FIG. 9 is a table showing the teaching ability of each subject according to the teacher by the leadership subject-specific leadership analysis system.

The example shown in FIG. 7 shows the transition of the academic ability of each subject in the class instructed by the A teacher of the elementary school in the leadership subject-specific leadership analysis system according to this embodiment. (A) is a graph from 2013 to 2014, (b) is a graph from 2014 to 2015. According to this result, it can be seen that the arithmetic increased by 3.5 points from 2013 to 2014, and increased by 6.5 points from 2015 to 2015. From this result, it can be seen that the teacher A has a high teaching ability in arithmetic.

The example shown in FIG. 8 shows the transition of academic ability of each English class, which is a subject instructed by the A teacher of the junior high school by the leadership subject-specific leadership analysis system according to the present embodiment. (A) is a graph from 2013 to 2014, (b) is a graph from 2014 to 2015. According to this result, in (a), there is not much change from 2013 to 2014 in each class (1 class 1 class to 5 classes a year) and average. In (b), there is not much change from 2014 to 2015 in each class (1 set from 2 years to 5 sets in 2 years) and average. From this result, it can be seen that teacher A's English teaching ability is average.

The example shown in FIG. 9 is a table comparing the average in 2014 and the average in 2015 in the departments (National Language, Society, Arithmetic, Science) in charge of A teacher to Q teacher in elementary school. (A) shows the numerical value as it is, and (b) shows the change of the deviation value in a tabular form by evaluating the difference from the average value in a plurality of stages, in this example, in five stages.

Referring to the table shown in FIG. 9 (a), it is possible to grasp in detail the teaching status of each teacher and the overall leadership.

In the table shown in FIG. 9B, the change amount of the deviation value is N, the evaluation result is “◯◯” when “N ≧ 3”, “◯” when N ≧ 2, and 2 <N <−2. "-" For N, "▲" for N≤-2, and "▲▲" for "N≤-3". This evaluation delimiter is determined based on the inventor's experience and can be changed as appropriate.

Referring to the table shown in FIG. 8 (b), it is possible to grasp at a glance the status of each teacher by subject and overall leadership. Here, although the example shown in FIG. 8 is an example applied to an elementary school teacher, it can be similarly applied to a junior high school teacher. Since the junior high school teacher is elected as a subject, it can be changed to the subject in charge in place of the subject name shown in FIGS.

In the examples shown in FIGS. 7 to 9, the deviation values are compared with respect to changes over time in a plurality of years. However, it is possible to perform changes over time at different times in the same year. By comparing within the same year, the state of leadership can be grasped at shorter intervals.

As described above, according to the leadership subject-specific leadership analysis system according to the present embodiment, even if the students are changed to different classes due to class change etc., the teacher's leadership is objectively quantitative. And it can be grasped visually, and from now on, the leadership of the leader can be analyzed objectively.

In the above embodiment, an example has been described in which an instructor teaches a plurality of subjects by taking an elementary school as an example. However, the same applies to a case where a teacher appointed by subject, such as a junior high school, provides guidance. Visualize the teaching skills of each subject of each teacher and analyze them objectively.

The present invention can quantitatively and visually grasp the teaching ability of the teacher objectively even if the student is changed to a different class due to class change, etc., and objectively analyzes the leadership ability of the teacher from now on It can be used in the education industry.

10: Leadership analysis system for each subject subject 20: Input unit 21: Input unit 22: Display unit 23: Data storage unit 30: Processing unit 31: Survey result database 32: Statistical processing unit 33: Visualization data output unit 34: Data Conversion unit 40: output unit 41: printing unit 42: display unit

Claims

Analyzing the survey results of each subject of each subject obtained through academic achievement surveys for a number of subjects continuously conducted for multiple subjects, and in charge of each subject of the subject A system for analyzing the leadership of a trained leader,
For all the survey subjects, item data including the academic achievement survey year, the survey subject identification number, the grade and class of the survey subject, the survey results by subject, and the instructor by subject A stored survey results database;
Statistical processing means for statistically processing secular changes of the survey results of the survey subject who was in charge of the instructor in each subject for each item of the item data;
Based on the output of the statistical processing means, visualization data output means for outputting visualization data that can visualize the secular change of the survey result of the survey subject for each designated instructor;
Image output means for outputting the visualization data as an image;
A leadership analysis system for each subject subject, characterized by comprising:
The statistical processing means calculates the deviation values of all subjects of all the subjects of survey from the survey results of all subjects of the subject of investigation from the item data stored in the survey result database. The leadership analysis system according to claim 1 characterized by the above-mentioned.
3. The leadership subject-specific leadership analysis system according to claim 1 or 2, further comprising input means for inputting the item data to the survey result database.
The survey result database stores the item data in a predetermined format,
The input means includes data conversion means for converting the item data in a format different from the format of data stored in the survey result database stored in another device into a format stored in the survey result database. The teaching power analysis system according to the subject subject according to claim 3, characterized by the above.
5. The visualization data output means outputs the visualization data in a graph or a table format for displaying a secular change of the deviation value of the survey subject for the designated instructor. The leadership analysis system according to the leader subject according to any one of the items up to.
The instructor is an elementary school teacher, and the visualization data output means displays a change over time of a deviation value of each subject of the subject who is the subject of the survey, or a change in one year. 6. The coaching subject-specific leadership analysis system according to claim 5, wherein the visualization data is output.
The instructor is a junior high school teacher, and the visualization data output means, for the subject in charge of the instructor, changes over time in the deviation value of each class to which the student who is the survey target belongs, or in one year 6. The coaching subject-specific leadership analysis system according to claim 5, wherein the visualization data for displaying a change is output.
The visualization data output means outputs, for the selected or a plurality of the instructors, the visualization data for displaying the change values of the deviation values of the survey subjects in each subject in charge in tabular form for each instructor. The instructing ability analysis system according to instructor subject according to claim 5, wherein
The visualization data output means outputs the visualization data for displaying a change in the deviation of the survey target person in each subject that the leader is in charge of as a result of evaluation in a plurality of stages for the selected one or a plurality of the leaders. The teaching power analysis system according to the subject subject according to claim 8, wherein:
10. The instruction subject analysis system according to any one of claims 1 to 9, wherein the image output means is an image display device or a printing device.
The instructing ability analysis system according to instructor subject according to claim 5, wherein the graph is a line graph or a bar graph showing a change in a deviation value of each subject for each instructor.