+
Skip to content

Conversation

arkid15r
Copy link
Collaborator

Proposed change

Update Python latest supported version format

Type of change

  • New country/market holidays support (thank you!)
  • Supported country/market holidays update (calendar discrepancy fix, localization)
  • Existing code/documentation/test/process quality improvement (best practice, cleanup, refactoring, optimization)
  • Dependency update (version deprecation/pin/upgrade)
  • Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Breaking change (a code change causing existing functionality to break)
  • New feature (new holidays functionality in general)

Checklist

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 13, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Improved the consistency of internal Python version information by updating the format to reflect the latest supported version.

Walkthrough

The update modifies the handling of version information in the tests/common.py file. Two constants that previously used tuple formats now use string representations. Specifically, the latest supported Python version is updated from (3, 12) to "3.13", and the current Python version is now generated using an f-string instead of a tuple.

Changes

File Change Summary
tests/common.py Updated PYTHON_LATEST_SUPPORTED_VERSION from (3, 12) to "3.13"; changed PYTHON_VERSION from a tuple (sys.version_info.major, sys.version_info.minor) to a formatted string f"{sys.version_info.major}.{sys.version_info.minor}"

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1448815 and e8271fb.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/common.py (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 300000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: Test build on ubuntu-latest
  • GitHub Check: Test build on windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: Test build on macos-latest
🔇 Additional comments (1)
tests/common.py (1)

24-25:

✅ Verification successful

Approve format change from tuple to string for Python version constants

The change from tuple representation to string format for both constants is good - it makes the version more human-readable and aligns with common version representation formats. The update also introduces support for Python 3.13.

One consideration: ensure that any code comparing these constants has been updated to handle string comparisons rather than tuple comparisons. String version comparisons can behave differently than tuple comparisons (e.g., "3.2" > "3.10" lexicographically, while (3, 2) < (3, 10) numerically).


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for any usage of these constants that might rely on tuple behavior
echo "Looking for usage of PYTHON_LATEST_SUPPORTED_VERSION and PYTHON_VERSION..."
rg "PYTHON_(LATEST_SUPPORTED_VERSION|VERSION)" --type py -A 3 -B 3

Length of output: 2722


Approved constant format change with caution on order comparisons

The conversion from tuple to string for Python version constants in tests/common.py is good. We've checked the repository usage, and currently, the only comparisons (using !=) in both tests/test_utils.py and tests/test_registry.py properly compare the strings. Just be mindful that if future comparisons rely on order (using < or >) rather than equality, you may need to adjust those comparisons to account for lexicographical order differences.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai plan to trigger planning for file edits and PR creation.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the test label Apr 13, 2025
@arkid15r arkid15r enabled auto-merge April 13, 2025 21:14
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 13, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (da10db4) to head (8a0bee2).
Report is 1 commits behind head on dev.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               dev     #2466   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files          210       210           
  Lines        13352     13352           
  Branches      1911      1911           
=========================================
  Hits         13352     13352           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

KJhellico
KJhellico previously approved these changes Apr 13, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

@KJhellico KJhellico left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

PPsyrius
PPsyrius previously approved these changes Apr 13, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

@PPsyrius PPsyrius left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@arkid15r arkid15r dismissed stale reviews from PPsyrius and KJhellico via 8a0bee2 April 13, 2025 23:09
Copy link

@arkid15r arkid15r requested review from KJhellico and PPsyrius April 13, 2025 23:11
@arkid15r arkid15r added this pull request to the merge queue Apr 13, 2025
Merged via the queue into vacanza:dev with commit b4d60d5 Apr 13, 2025
33 checks passed
@arkid15r arkid15r deleted the update-common-tests branch April 13, 2025 23:28
@KJhellico KJhellico mentioned this pull request Apr 21, 2025
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Jun 6, 2025
9 tasks
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Oct 9, 2025
9 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

点击 这是indexloc提供的php浏览器服务,不要输入任何密码和下载