+
Skip to content

03 placeOrder refactor and validateOrder #6583

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

sujithvn
Copy link
Contributor

@sujithvn sujithvn commented Oct 20, 2022

This PR is replaced by #6616

Signed-off-by: Sujith mail.sujithvn@gmail.com

Resolves #6471
Impact: breaking
Type: feature

Issue

In the current system, the only way for order fulfillment is via shipping which is hardcoded into the system. We need to introduce the flexibility for users to add their own fulfillment types via plugins.

Solution

We are creating a base fulfillment plugin which would enable other fulfillment types (like shipping, pickup, digital) to be introduced via plugins. Each of the newly introduced fulfillment type plugin would need to have the specific fulfillment methods also to be added as separate plugins. Example, fulfillment type 'pickup' could have fulfillment methods like 'store pickup' and 'curb-side pickup'.

This PR is 5th entry (03 placeOrder refactor and validateOrder)

PR Details in order

feat/fulfillment-types
 | 
 | __ 01 fulfillment base #6570 
 |        | __ 01-01 fulfillment-type-shipping       #6579
 |        | __ 01-02 fulfillment-type-pickup.    #6577 
 |__02 fulfillment-type-impacted-plugins. [carts, products, orders, catalogs].   #6582 
 |__03 placeOrder refactor         <--- This PR   #6583 

Existing PRs based on the #6480 (to be updated to point to #6570)

We shall change the base branch of the 3 existing PRs (i18n #6545, dataMigration #6544, setDefaultFFtype #6543) to point to 01 fulfillment base

Details (specific to placeOrder refactor and introduction of validateOrder end-point)

  • Moved out most of the functionalities from placeOrder to prepareOrder.
  • Flattened out the hierarchical function calls by 1-2 levels and placed all the called functions in folder orderValidators inside util. Most of the functions are copied over from existing code base.
  • prepareOrder builds up the order object and performs the validation steps in parallel. Validation results are accumulated in an array for most of the errors except the initial 2-3 errors where we return with the error.
  • Both placeOrder and validateOrder calls prepareOrder with respective flags.
  • Few steps specifically are related to payments auth and are skipped in case validateOrder is calling prepareOrder.
  • In case of validateOrder call, most of the function calls are placed in a try-catch block to collect the errors. In case of placeOrder call, functions are directly executed.
  • Final order object is validated against the schema (in case of prepare order, it is validated against a custom schema).
  • prepareOrder returns Order & token to placeOrder, and returns success flag and validationResults to validateOrder.
  • placeOrder will finally insert the order returned by prepareOrder into the DB and completes the placing of order.

Breaking changes

Since this is the new way of handling fulfillment, the existing shipment plugins would not work along with this. User would need to migrate the data (migration script will be developed) and remove the shipment plugins (api-plugin-shipments and api-plugin-shipments-flat-rate).

Testing

All this is new code and at this stage this is not integrated to reaction, meaning the plugins.json is not updated to include this plugin. Hence proper testing can be carried out only after merging in the remaining PRs.

Signed-off-by: Sujith <mail.sujithvn@gmail.com>
@changeset-bot
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Oct 20, 2022

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: ca86288

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@sujithvn sujithvn changed the title feat: new validateOrder and placeOrder refactor 03 placeOrder refactor and validateOrder Oct 24, 2022
address: data ? data.shippingAddress : null,
shopId,
type,
workflow: { status: "new", workflow: ["new"] }
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't this workflow be based on the fulfillment group?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@zenweasel I am not clear on your comment. Could we discuss?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As discussed previously, the workflow of the order should be defined by the FFT. Since the workflow for a shipped order is very different for a download which is very different for a store pickup

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Has this comment been dealt with?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not yet, I shall update it today

Signed-off-by: Sujith <mail.sujithvn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sujith <mail.sujithvn@gmail.com>
@sujithvn sujithvn requested a review from brent-hoover October 27, 2022 19:55
Signed-off-by: Sujith <mail.sujithvn@gmail.com>
@sujithvn sujithvn marked this pull request as draft November 3, 2022 12:43
@brent-hoover brent-hoover requested review from aldeed and brent-hoover and removed request for brent-hoover and aldeed December 9, 2022 04:04
@sujithvn
Copy link
Contributor Author

sujithvn commented Dec 9, 2022

This PR is replaced by 6616
#6616

@sujithvn sujithvn closed this Dec 9, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants
点击 这是indexloc提供的php浏览器服务,不要输入任何密码和下载