Update track-lead.ts #2669
Update track-lead.ts #2669
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
WalkthroughA validation step was added to the lead tracking logic to ensure that the link associated with a click event exists and is owned by the current workspace. If the link is missing or does not belong to the workspace, an error is thrown, halting further processing. Changes
Estimated code review effort2 (~15 minutes) Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
apps/web/lib/api/conversions/track-lead.ts (1)
102-124: Excellent security validation implementation.This validation properly ensures that:
- The link referenced by the click event exists in the database
- The link belongs to the current workspace, preventing cross-workspace data access
The implementation follows good practices by selecting only the necessary
projectIdfield and using appropriate error handling.Consider using a generic error message for both validation failures to prevent information leakage:
if (!link) { throw new DubApiError({ code: "not_found", - message: `Link not found for clickId: ${clickId}`, + message: `Invalid click event`, }); } if (link.projectId !== workspace.id) { throw new DubApiError({ code: "not_found", - message: `Link does not belong to the workspace`, + message: `Invalid click event`, }); }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
apps/web/lib/api/conversions/track-lead.ts(1 hunks)
🧠 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: devkiran
PR: dubinc/dub#2177
File: apps/web/lib/api/links/bulk-create-links.ts:66-84
Timestamp: 2025-06-06T07:59:03.120Z
Learning: In apps/web/lib/api/links/bulk-create-links.ts, the team accepts the risk of potential undefined results from links.find() operations when building invalidLinks arrays, because existing links are fetched from the database based on the input links, so matches are expected to always exist.
apps/web/lib/api/conversions/track-lead.ts (2)
Learnt from: devkiran
PR: #2177
File: apps/web/lib/api/links/bulk-create-links.ts:66-84
Timestamp: 2025-06-06T07:59:03.120Z
Learning: In apps/web/lib/api/links/bulk-create-links.ts, the team accepts the risk of potential undefined results from links.find() operations when building invalidLinks arrays, because existing links are fetched from the database based on the input links, so matches are expected to always exist.
Learnt from: devkiran
PR: #2637
File: apps/web/app/(ee)/api/singular/webhook/route.ts:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-17T06:41:45.598Z
Learning: In the Singular integration (apps/web/app/(ee)/api/singular/webhook/route.ts), the event names in the singularToDubEvent object have intentionally different casing: "Copy GAID" and "copy IDFA". This casing difference is valid and should not be changed, as these are the correct event names expected from Singular.
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: devkiran
PR: dubinc/dub#2177
File: apps/web/lib/api/links/bulk-create-links.ts:66-84
Timestamp: 2025-06-06T07:59:03.120Z
Learning: In apps/web/lib/api/links/bulk-create-links.ts, the team accepts the risk of potential undefined results from links.find() operations when building invalidLinks arrays, because existing links are fetched from the database based on the input links, so matches are expected to always exist.
apps/web/lib/api/conversions/track-lead.ts (2)
Learnt from: devkiran
PR: #2177
File: apps/web/lib/api/links/bulk-create-links.ts:66-84
Timestamp: 2025-06-06T07:59:03.120Z
Learning: In apps/web/lib/api/links/bulk-create-links.ts, the team accepts the risk of potential undefined results from links.find() operations when building invalidLinks arrays, because existing links are fetched from the database based on the input links, so matches are expected to always exist.
Learnt from: devkiran
PR: #2637
File: apps/web/app/(ee)/api/singular/webhook/route.ts:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-17T06:41:45.598Z
Learning: In the Singular integration (apps/web/app/(ee)/api/singular/webhook/route.ts), the event names in the singularToDubEvent object have intentionally different casing: "Copy GAID" and "copy IDFA". This casing difference is valid and should not be changed, as these are the correct event names expected from Singular.
|
@CodeRabbit final review |
|
Tip For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes. 🧩 Analysis chain@steven-tey Here's my final review of the changes in Security ✅The added validation is excellent for preventing unauthorized access. The code properly:
Code Quality ✅
Performance ✅
Error Handling ✅
This is a solid security improvement that adds proper authorization checks without impacting performance. The implementation follows best practices and maintains consistency with the existing codebase. Approval: ✅ Ready to merge 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 9031 @steven-tey Perfect! After reviewing the complete implementation, this is an excellent security enhancement. Here's my comprehensive final review: 🔒 Security Enhancement - Excellent ImplementationKey Security Improvements:
Implementation Quality ✅Database Efficiency:
Error Handling:
Code Placement:
Performance Impact:
Security Impact 🎯This change closes a potential security gap where malicious actors could potentially track leads against links from workspaces they don't own, simply by knowing a Final Assessment: ✅ APPROVED - Ready for Production This is a critical security improvement with clean, efficient implementation that follows all best practices. The code is production-ready and should be merged. |
Summary by CodeRabbit