这是indexloc提供的服务,不要输入任何密码
Skip to content

Conversation

@fneddy
Copy link
Contributor

@fneddy fneddy commented Dec 4, 2024

when build with traditional configure && make in-tree, some build artifacts will pop up that are not excluded by .gitignore.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated the .gitignore file to exclude additional files and directories, enhancing version control management.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 4, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve modifications to the .gitignore file, where several new entries have been added. These entries include specific header files, a directory for cached files, temporary files related to builds, and a source code file. The updates aim to exclude these items from version control, improving the management of files that are not necessary to track.

Changes

File Change Summary
.gitignore Added entries: zconf-ng.h.included, zlib_name_mangling-ng.h, zlib-ng.h, .cache, Makefile.tmp, makecrct, maketrees, gzread.c

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Developer
    participant Git
    Developer->>Git: Modify .gitignore
    Git->>Git: Add new entries to ignore list
    Git->>Repository: Update ignored files
Loading

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.gitignore (1)

79-82: Adjust pattern consistency for build artifacts

The build artifact patterns should follow consistent rules:

  • Remove leading slash from Makefile.tmp as it could appear in subdirectories
  • Keep leading slashes for build tools (makecrct, maketrees)
  • Consider if gzread.c needs a leading slash based on where it's generated

Apply this diff:

-Makefile.tmp
-/makecrct
-/maketrees
-gzread.c
+Makefile.tmp
+/makecrct
+/maketrees
+/gzread.c

Additionally, consider adding a comment to document that these are configure/make build artifacts.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2562fd1 and cad9a0c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .gitignore (3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.gitignore (2)

67-67: LGTM!

The .cache directory entry follows the correct pattern style and is appropriately placed.


30-32: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Relocate and adjust style of header file entries

These header file entries should be moved near the other header patterns (around line 60) and the leading slashes should be removed to maintain consistency with the existing style.

Apply this diff:

-/zconf-ng.h.included
-/zlib_name_mangling-ng.h
-/zlib-ng.h
+zconf-ng.h.included
+zlib_name_mangling-ng.h
+zlib-ng.h

Comment on lines +79 to +82
Makefile.tmp
/makecrct
/maketrees
gzread.c
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Based on the build system analysis, I can now provide a final response:

Additional build artifacts need to be ignored

The project uses both CMake and Configure build systems. The current .gitignore is missing several common build artifacts:

  • CMake build artifacts:
    • CMakeFiles/
    • CMakeCache.txt
    • cmake_install.cmake
    • CPackConfig.cmake
    • CPackSourceConfig.cmake
    • *.a
    • *.so*
    • *.dll
    • *.dylib
  • Build outputs:
    • minigzip
    • minideflate
    • libz.*
    • zlib.pc
  • Test artifacts:
    • test/example
    • test/minigzip
    • test/gtest_zlib

These patterns should be added to ensure all build artifacts are properly ignored.

🔗 Analysis chain

Verify coverage of in-tree build artifacts

Let's ensure we haven't missed any common build artifacts.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for typical configure/make artifacts in the repository
# that might not be covered by current patterns

# Look for configure-generated files
fd -H -E .git "config\.(log|status|cache)" 

# Look for make-generated files
fd -H -E .git "\.deps$|\.libs$|\.dirstamp$"

# Look for common object file patterns not covered
fd -H -E .git "\.(la|lai|lo|o|so|so\.[0-9]+)$"

Length of output: 139


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the build system and potential artifacts by:
# 1. Looking for build-related files to understand the build system
# 2. Checking for patterns of generated files in build instructions

# Check for build system files
fd -H -E .git "configure\.ac|configure\.in|Makefile\.am|Makefile\.in|CMakeLists\.txt|\.cmake$"

# Look at build instructions in documentation
if [ -f "README.md" ]; then
    echo "=== README.md ==="
    cat README.md | grep -A 5 -i "build\|compile\|make"
fi

if [ -f "INSTALL" ]; then
    echo "=== INSTALL ==="
    cat INSTALL | grep -A 5 -i "build\|compile\|make"
fi

# Check for any existing make targets
if [ -f "Makefile" ]; then
    echo "=== Makefile targets ==="
    grep "^[a-zA-Z0-9_-]*:" Makefile
fi

Length of output: 13362

Copy link
Member

@Dead2 Dead2 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 15, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 32.19%. Comparing base (2562fd1) to head (cad9a0c).
Report is 7 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##           develop    #1823       +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage         0   32.19%   +32.19%     
============================================
  Files            0       67       +67     
  Lines            0     5752     +5752     
  Branches         0     1237     +1237     
============================================
+ Hits             0     1852     +1852     
- Misses           0     3644     +3644     
- Partials         0      256      +256     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@Dead2 Dead2 merged commit c295c28 into zlib-ng:develop Dec 20, 2024
144 of 150 checks passed
@Dead2 Dead2 mentioned this pull request Dec 31, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants