WO2024147748A1

WO2024147748A1 - Method for determining a person's neurophysiological type

Info

Publication number: WO2024147748A1
Application number: PCT/RU2023/050319
Authority: WO
Inventors: Александр Викторович КОСЯКОВ; Александр Дмитриевич ИШКОВ
Original assignee: Александр Викторович КОСЯКОВ; Александр Дмитриевич ИШКОВ
Priority date: 2023-01-05
Filing date: 2023-12-29
Publication date: 2024-07-11

Abstract

In the proposed method for determining a person's neurophysiological type, a subject undergoes, in an arbitrary order, diagnostic assessment to identify the dominant pole in the following nervous structure dichotomies: excitatory subsystem or inhibitory subsystem; sensory or motor nervous subsystem; somatic or autonomic nervous system; first or second signalling system. The subject's neurotype is determined on the basis of the dominant nervous structures identified. The technical result of the proposed solution consists in a more accurate determination of a person's neurotype by virtue of: using, in order to identify a person's neurophysiological type, only neurophysiological structural bases; using more than one neurophysiological basis; and using only dichotomous bases.

Description

Method for determining the neurophysiological type of a person

The invention relates to the field of neurophysiology and psychology of individual differences and can be used in psychological counseling, professional selection, career guidance, personnel selection, team formation, etc.

There is a known method for determining the psychological type according to Anuashvili (patent for invention RU No. 2201131, IPC A61B 5/04, 2003), in which, based on identifying the dominant hemisphere of the human brain and the degree of coordination of the oscillatory processes occurring in the hemispheres, one of eight is diagnosed psychological types. The disadvantage of this known method is the insufficient reliability (accuracy) of determining the type of temperament, since the criteria for assessing the degree of consistency of oscillatory processes in the cerebral hemispheres (low, medium, high) are determined empirically, and, therefore, depend on many different circumstances (sample of subjects, research methods, equipment used, operating conditions, personnel qualifications, etc.). In addition, in the known solution, in two of the eight psychological types there is no dominance of one of the hemispheres, that is, in this method non-dichotomous (bipolar) scales are used, which leads to “fuzzy”, ambiguity in the definition of types and their characteristics, respectively, reducing reliability ( accuracy) of diagnosis.

The closest to the proposed solution is the method of determining a person’s type based on neurophysiological parameters P.P. Blonsky, including the identification of the dominant nervous department (subsystem) of the autonomic (visceral) nervous system, which consists of an interconnected pair: sympathetic (excitation subsystem) and parasympathetic (inhibition subsystem) departments (Ilyin E.P. Psychology of individual differences. - St. Petersburg: Peter , 2004. P. 23). Thus, in a known solution, the interaction features are revealed structures of the nervous system, and not parameters derived from the characteristics of this interaction - properties of the nervous system. The sympathetic nervous system is responsible for excitation (stimulation) of the internal functions of the body, and the parasympathetic nervous system is responsible for inhibiting the internal functions of the body. The disadvantage of this typology is the use of only one neurophysiological parameter (dominance of one of the two subsystems of the autonomic nervous system), which divides the subjects into only two parts (with dominance of the sympathetic or parasympathetic parts of the autonomic nervous system), and, accordingly, does not allow characterizing the subject with sufficient accuracy .

The technical result of the proposed solution is to increase the accuracy of determining (diagnosis) the neurophysiological type (neurotype, temperament type, personality type, psychological type) of a person due to: a) using only neurophysiological structural (material, objectively existing) grounds to identify a person’s neurophysiological type; b) using more than one neurophysiological basis; c) the use of only dichotomous (bipolar) grounds. In addition, the proposed solution expands the arsenal of technical tools designed to determine a person’s neurotype.

This technical result is achieved by the fact that in the method for determining the neurophysiological type of a person, including identifying in the autonomic nervous system the dominant subsystem from an interconnected pair: the excitation subsystem or the inhibition subsystem, according to the invention, the dominant nervous subsystem from the interconnected pair is identified in the somatic nervous system: the sensory subsystem or motor subsystem, identifying the leading nervous system from an interconnected pair: the somatic or autonomic nervous system, and based on the predominant nervous structures, the neurotype is determined as 1) motor, if the somatic nervous system is leading and the motor nervous subsystem dominates;

2) sensory, if the somatic nervous system is leading and the sensory nervous subsystem dominates;

3) excitable, if the autonomic nervous system is leading and the excitation subsystem dominates;

4) inhibitory, if the autonomic nervous system is leading and the inhibition subsystem dominates.

The use of three neurophysiological dichotomous bases for diagnosing a person’s neurotype (instead of one in the prototype) increases the accuracy of determining the neurotype and, accordingly, its characteristics.

When determining the neurotype, you can additionally (compared to the solution according to claim 1 of the invention formula) take into account the dominant nervous subsystem of the driven nervous system. Then the neurotype is determined as:

1) motor excitable, if the somatic nervous system is leading, and the motor nervous subsystem and the excitation subsystem dominate;

2) motor inhibitory, if the somatic nervous system is leading, and the motor nervous subsystem and the inhibition subsystem dominate;

3) sensory excitable, if the leading one is the somatic nervous system, and the sensory nervous subsystem and the excitation subsystem dominate;

4) sensory inhibitory, if the somatic nervous system is leading, and the sensory nervous subsystem and the inhibitory subsystem dominate;

5) excitable motor, if the leading one is the autonomic nervous system, and the excitation subsystem and the motor nervous subsystem dominate; 6) excitable sensory, if the leading one is the autonomic nervous system, and the excitation subsystem and the sensory nervous subsystem dominate;

7) inhibitory motor, if the leading one is the autonomic nervous system, and the inhibition subsystem and the motor nervous subsystem dominate;

8) inhibitory sensory, if the leading one is the autonomic nervous system, and the inhibitory subsystem and the sensory nervous subsystem dominate.

Taking into account the dominant nervous subsystem of the slave nervous system increases (compared to the solution according to claim 1 of the invention formula) the number of neurotypes from four to eight, which, accordingly, increases the accuracy of neurotype determination by 2 times.

If we additionally (compared to the solution according to claim 1 of the claims) identify the leading signaling system from an interconnected pair: the first or second signaling system, then the following neurotypes can be distinguished:

1) motor primary signal, if the motor nervous subsystem dominates, and the leading ones are the somatic nervous system and the first signaling system;

2) motor secondary signal, if the motor nervous subsystem dominates, and the leading ones are the somatic nervous system and the second signaling system;

3) sensory primary signal, if the sensory nervous subsystem dominates, and the leading ones are the somatic nervous system and the first signaling system;

4) sensory secondary signal, if the sensory nervous subsystem dominates, and the leading ones are the somatic nervous system and the second signaling system; 5) excitable primary signal, if the excitation subsystem dominates, and the leading ones are the autonomic nervous system and the first signaling system;

6) excitable secondary signal, if the excitation subsystem dominates, and the leading ones are the autonomic nervous system and the second signaling system;

7) inhibitory first-signal, if the inhibition subsystem dominates, and the leading ones are the autonomic nervous system and the first signaling system;

8) inhibitory secondary signal, if the inhibition subsystem dominates, and the leading ones are the autonomic nervous system and the second signaling system.

Taking into account the leading signaling system increases (compared to the solution according to claim 1 of the invention formula) the number of neurotypes from four to eight, which, accordingly, increases the accuracy of neurotype determination by 2 times. The use of four neurophysiological dichotomous bases for diagnosing a neurotype (instead of three according to paragraphs 1 and 2 of the invention formula) also increases the reliability and accuracy of determining the neurotype.

If we additionally (compared to the solution according to claim 1 of the claims) identify the leading signaling system from an interconnected pair: the first or second signaling system, and take into account the dominant nervous subsystem of the driven nervous system, then the following neurotypes can be distinguished:

1) motor first-signal excitable, if the leading ones are the somatic and first signal systems, and the motor subsystem and the excitation subsystem dominate;

2) motor first-signal inhibitory, if the somatic and first signal systems are leading, and the motor subsystem and the inhibition subsystem are dominant; ) motor secondary signal excitable, if the leading ones are the somatic and second signaling systems, and the motor subsystem and the excitation subsystem dominate; ) motor secondary signal inhibitory, if the leading ones are the somatic and second signaling systems, and the motor subsystem and the inhibition subsystem are dominant; ) sensory primary signal excitable, if the leading ones are the somatic and first signaling systems, and the sensory subsystem and the excitation subsystem dominate; ) sensory first-signal inhibitory, if the leading ones are the somatic and the first signaling systems, and the sensory subsystem and the inhibition subsystem are dominant; ) sensory secondary signal excitable, if the leading ones are the somatic and second signaling systems, and the sensory subsystem and the excitation subsystem dominate; ) sensory secondary signal inhibitory, if the leading ones are the somatic and second signaling systems, and the sensory subsystem and the inhibition subsystem are dominant; ) excitable first-signal motor, if the autonomic and first signal systems are leading, and the excitation subsystem and the motor nervous subsystem are dominant; 0) excitable first-signal sensory, if the leading ones are the autonomic and first signal systems, and the excitation subsystem and the sensory nervous subsystem dominate; 1) excitable secondary signal motor, if the leading ones are the autonomic and second signaling systems, and the excitation subsystem and the motor nervous subsystem dominate; 2) excitable secondary-signal sensory, if the leading ones are the autonomic and second signaling systems, and the excitation subsystem and the sensory nervous subsystem dominate; 13) inhibitory first-signal motor, if the autonomic and first signal systems are leading, and the inhibition subsystem and the motor nervous subsystem are dominant;

14) inhibitory first-signal sensory, if the autonomic and first signal systems are leading, and the inhibition subsystem and sensory nervous subsystem are dominant;

15) inhibitory secondary signal motor, if the leading ones are the autonomic and second signaling systems, and the inhibition subsystem and the motor nervous subsystem are dominant;

16) inhibitory secondary signal sensory, if the leading ones are the autonomic and second signaling systems, and the inhibition subsystem and the sensory nervous subsystem are dominant.

Taking into account the leading signaling system and the dominant nervous subsystem of the slave nervous system increases (compared to the solution according to claim 1 of the invention formula) the number of neurotypes from four to sixteen, which, accordingly, increases the accuracy of determining the neurotype and its characteristics by 4 times. The use in the proposed solution of only dichotomous (bipolar) scales (somatic or autonomic nervous system; sensory or motor nervous subsystem; excitation subsystem or inhibition subsystem; first or second signal system) increases the reliability and accuracy of neurotype diagnosis, because eliminates:

• the need for artificial and empirical establishment of the boundaries between types on the scale;

• vagueness (blurriness) and ambiguity in the definition of types and their characteristics.

The main task of the nervous system is to preserve the body as a whole, and in order not to end up in the position of Buridan’s donkey in a life-threatening situation, the nervous system is built on a hierarchical principle. Identification of the predominant (dominant or leading) nervous structure from an interconnected pair of neurophysiological parameters (somatic or autonomic nervous system; sensory or motor nervous subsystem; excitation subsystem or inhibition subsystem of internal functions of the body; first or second signaling system) allows you to transfer the hierarchical principle of constructing the nervous system into the typology, which increases the reliability and accuracy of diagnosing a person’s neurotype.

Identification of two dominant nervous subsystems gives 4 pairs of combinations of nervous subsystems: motor-excitatory, motor-inhibitory, sensory-excitatory, sensory-inhibitory. According to the hierarchical principle, there cannot be equality of subsystems in these pairs, therefore, the leading nervous system from the interconnected pair is additionally identified: the somatic or autonomic nervous system. If the somatic nervous system turns out to be leading, then of the two dominant nervous subsystems, the sensory or motor nervous subsystem will come out on top. And if the autonomic nervous system turns out to be leading, then of the two dominant nervous subsystems, the excitatory (excitable) or inhibitory (inhibitory) nervous subsystem will come out on top.

Information about the leading nervous system allows you to clarify the type (in comparison with the prototype) and, if you do not take into account the influence of the second dominant subsystem, then the number of neurotypes is reduced to four: motor; sensory; excitable; brake. These neurotypes correspond to four classical types of temperament: motor - sanguine, sensory - melancholic, excitable - choleric, inhibitory - phlegmatic.

If we take into account the dominant nervous subsystem of the driven nervous system, we can distinguish the following 8 neurotypes: motor excitable; motor brake; sensory excitable; touch brake; excitable motor; excitable sensory; brake motor; braking touch. If we additionally (compared to the solution according to claim 1 of the claims) identify the leading signaling system, then the following 8 neurotypes can be distinguished: motor primary signal; motor secondary signal; sensory primary signal; sensory secondary signal; excitable primary signal; excitable secondary signal; brake first signal; brake secondary signal.

If the four neurotypes corresponding to the classical types of temperament take into account the dominant nervous subsystem of the driven nervous system and the leading signaling system, then 16 neurotypes can be distinguished. Let us give their names at the neurophysiological level: motor primary-signal excitable; motor first-signal brake; motor second-signal excitable; motor secondary signal brake; sensory primary signal excitable; sensory first-signal brake; sensory second-signal excitable; touch secondary signal brake; excitable first-signal motor; excitable primary sensory; excitable second-signal motor; excitable second-signal sensory; brake first-signal motor; inhibitory first-signal sensory; brake secondary signal motor; brake secondary signal touch.

The somatic nervous system is designed to respond to external signals and at the psychological (behavioral) level manifests itself as extrajection - orientation towards external factors. The visceral (visceral, autonomic) nervous system regulates the functioning of internal organs, endocrine and exocrine glands, blood and lymphatic vessels, and at the psychological (behavioral) level manifests itself as introjection - orientation towards internal factors.

The motor nervous subsystem is designed to carry out motor reactions and at the psychological level manifests itself as motor skills - the activity of skeletal muscles, muscle contractions, movement. The sensory nervous subsystem is designed to perceive various signals and at the psychological level manifests itself as sensory

- sensation or perception of signals from the external and internal environment.

The arousal subsystem (often associated with the sympathetic nervous subsystem) is designed to stimulate the internal functions of the body necessary to cope with stress, through their arousal and on a psychological level manifests itself as impulsivity. The inhibition subsystem (which is often associated with the parasympathetic nervous subsystem) is designed to restore the body's expended energy reserves through inhibition of body functions and manifests itself at the psychological level as stability.

The first signaling system (usually the right hemisphere) is designed to perceive and analyze specific stimuli (signals) of the real world, affecting any receptors of the body, on the basis of which concrete sensory cognition of the surrounding world occurs, and at the psychological level manifests itself as concretization. The second signaling system (usually the left hemisphere) operates with words, speech (“signal signals”) and, reflecting reality in symbolic form, allows a person to escape from specific objects and phenomena. Being the basis for the development of abstract logical thinking, the second signaling system at the psychological level manifests itself as abstraction.

The method is carried out as follows.

The client undergoes diagnostics in random order to identify the predominant (dominant or leading) pole in the following dichotomies of nervous structures:

• excitation subsystem or braking subsystem;

• sensory or motor nervous subsystem;

• somatic or autonomic nervous system;

• first or second signaling system.

Diagnostics can be carried out using both hardware (which is preferable) and blank methods (using questionnaires). However, the equipment necessary for diagnostics is not widespread and is available only in specialized organizations, and the hardware diagnostic procedure itself is expensive and takes quite a long time. Therefore, survey methods are more often used. For example, the poles of the neurophysiological dichotomy “sensory or motor nervous subsystem” can be diagnosed using the sensitivity scales of psychological questionnaires, the poles of the neurophysiological dichotomy “somatic or autonomic nervous system” - using the “rationality - irrationality (intuitiveness)” scales of survey techniques, and the poles of the neurophysiological dichotomies “first or second signaling system” - on the scales “concrete (visual-figurative) - abstract (verbal-logical) thinking” of questionnaires.

To identify the dominant subsystem in the dichotomy “excitation subsystem or inhibition subsystem,” the following methods can be used, in particular: Kerdo vegetative index; Danini-Aschner ocular reflex; study of dermographism; table A.M. Wayne to determine the initial vegetative tone of the body; determination of the initial autonomic tone using the cardiointervalography (CIG) method based on the analysis of heart rate variability.

To identify the dominant subsystem in the dichotomy “sensory or motor nervous subsystem,” the following methods can be used, in particular: the “Sensitivity” scale of the Psychodiagnostic Test (PDT) by V.M. Melnikova and L.T. Yampolsky; “Sensitive type” scale of the Pathocharacterological Diagnostic Questionnaire (PDO) A.E. Lichko; Aeron Sensitivity Scale test; Self-Actualization Test (CAT) sensitivity scale; “Sensitivity” scale of the Individual Typological Questionnaire (ITO) by L. I. Sobchik; method “Determining the strength of the nervous system using the tapping test.”

To identify the leading system in the dichotomy “somatic or autonomic nervous system,” the following methods can be used, in particular: A. Ellis’s method for diagnosing irrational attitudes; Epstein's Intuitive Style Inventory (Rational-Experient); tests for balance - imbalance (predominance of excitation or inhibition) of nervous processes, for example - energy consumption in a state of physiological rest; -methods of kinematometric study of the external and internal balance of nervous processes.

To identify the dominant subsystem in the dichotomy “first or second signaling system,” the following techniques can be used, in particular: the “Exclusion of the Superfluous” technique; technique “Identification of essential features”; Methodology “Type of Thinking” G.V. Rezapkina; B. Kadyrov’s questionnaire to identify the relationship between two signal systems; method for identifying the relationship between signal systems E.A. Klimova.

The best option for determining the neurophysiological type is to use the “Human Neurotype” questionnaire, which contains 4 scales. When choosing an answer option, the subject is recommended, if possible, to focus on his behavior in childhood, when his natural characteristics were not yet covered (disguised) acquired in the process of life.

I. “Extrajection - Introjection” scale.

1. You usually respond to external calls a) proportionately and in a timely manner b) disproportionately and untimely

2. In communication, you a) are not inclined to philosophize too much or talk about abstract topics b) you can happily support philosophical topics, conversations about new discoveries and theoretical concepts

3. You prefer to a) start with specific steps and details b) evaluate the situation comprehensively, taking into account important relationships, and only then proceed to the details

4. When external changes occur, then a) you react to them adequately without excessive reflection b) you need time to rebuild your reactions

5. You prefer a) tangible goals in the foreseeable future b) long-term goals aimed at solving important problems

6. You are annoyed by a) isolation from reality b) primitive understanding

7. Would you rather prefer a) “bird in hand” b) “pie in the sky”

If option a) predominates in the answers, then the subject is an extraject (the somatic nervous system predominates), and if option b) is an introject (the autonomic (visceral) nervous system predominates).

II. "Motor - sensory" scale.

1. It’s easier for you to a) start acting and then think b) think about your actions before starting them

2. a) You refuse people relatively easily b) It’s difficult for you to say “no”

3. a) You can work calmly anywhere, the work and the task are important to you b) It is difficult for you to withstand uncomfortable working conditions

4. You are rather a) assertive and decisive b) shy and self-conscious

5. You are rather a) sociable, do not feel constrained with people who are new to you b) find it difficult to establish contact with strangers

6. You are a) resilient and efficient b) you get tired quickly

7. You a) have loud, persuasive speech b) have quiet, calm speech

8. You a) feel at ease and quickly get used to a new environment b) feel constrained in a new environment

9. You are more likely to a) be energetic and active b) restrained and strive for the essence

10. You are more likely to a) react irritably and aggressively to failures and troubles b) feel depressed and confused when failures occur

11. You a) adapt to different circumstances relatively easily b) have difficulty adapting to new circumstances

12. You are more inclined to a) skim the surface of the situation without going into unnecessary details b) go deeper into the situation, find out the details

13. You will be very happy to engage in a) trading operations b) research

If option a) predominates in the answers, then the subject is a motor person (the motor nervous subsystem predominates), and if option b) is a sensory person (the sensory nervous subsystem predominates).

III. “Impulsivity - Stability” scale.

1. Usually you a) feel people’s emotions and moods b) try to understand other people

2. When persuading another person, you are more likely to rely on a) feelings b) logic

3. Usually you a) are emotional and prone to hotheadedness b) try to be calm and cool-headed

4. You are a) prone to sudden mood swings b) restrained and patient

5. You a) have emotionally uneven speech b) have calm, even speech

6. You are somewhat a) harsh b) slow

7. You are more a) emotional b) logical

8. You work comfortably in a state of a) increased tone b) inner calm, balance

9. You have a better understanding of a) the feelings, emotions and moods of people b) the causes and circumstances of people’s emotional reactions

If option a) predominates in the answers, then the subject is classified as impulsive (excitation subsystem predominates), and if option b) is stable (inhibition subsystem predominates).

IV. The “Concretization - Abstraction” scale (accordingly, the leading form of information reflection: concrete-figurative or abstract-symbolic).

1. You are more likely a) an “artist” b) "thinker"

2. When defending, you are more prone to a) an active-aggressive reaction b) a passive-defensive reaction

3. You a) strive for vivid impressions b) do not like strong impressions

4. You a) love change b) strive for a calm, orderly life

5. You a) are sometimes unrestrained and aggressive b) you easily control your emotions and are non-aggressive

6. a) You are attracted to new experiences b) You rather prefer known pleasures

7. You prefer to a) explore new opportunities that arise in new directions b) focus on clear goals

8. You a) need visual information b) perceive speech and text information well

9. You are a) subject to mood swings b) cool-headed and self-possessed

10. You a) have a good sense of intonation and subtext b) understand everything literally, hints are not very clear to you

11. You are a) spontaneous b) usually predictable

12. You a) are compliant in their formulations on fundamental issues b) stubbornly defend principled positions

13. You a) are open to new contacts b) do not strive to expand your contacts

If option a) predominates in the answers, then the subject belongs to the concretizing ones (the first signaling system predominates), and if option b) - then to the abstracting ones (the second signaling system predominates).

The names of neurotypes at the neurophysiological level correlate with their names at the psychological level as follows:

1) motor first-signal excitable - this is motor concretizing impulsive;

2) motor first-signal inhibitory - this is motor concretizing stable;

3) motor second-signal excitable - this is motor abstracting impulsive;

4) motor second-signal inhibitory - this is motor abstraction stable;

5) sensory first-signal excitable - this is a sensory concretizing impulsive;

6) sensory first-signal inhibitory - this is sensory concretizing stable;

7) sensory second-signal excitable - this is sensory abstracting impulsive;

8) sensory second-signal inhibitory - this is sensory abstracting stable;

9) excitable first-signal motor is an impulsive concretizing motor;

10) excitable first-signal sensory is an impulsive concretizing sensory; 11) excitable second-signal motor is an impulsive abstracting motor;

12) excitable second-signal sensory is an impulsive abstracting sensory;

13) inhibitory first-signal motor is a stable concretizing motor;

14) inhibitory primary sensory is a stable concretizing sensory;

15) inhibitory second-signal motor is a stable abstracting motor;

16) inhibitory second-signal sensory is a stable abstracting sensory.

Examples of method implementation.

Example 1. Client 1 answered the questions of the “Human Neurotype” questionnaire and received the following results:

• Scale “Extrajection - Introjection” - 5 answers a) and 2 answers b), which indicates the predominance of extrajection, that is, the somatic nervous system.

• “Motor - sensory” scale - 9 answers a) and 4 answers b), which indicates the predominance of his motor skills, that is, the motor nervous subsystem.

• “Impulsivity - stability” scale - 6 answers a) and 3 answers b), which indicates the predominance of impulsiveness, that is, the excitation subsystem.

• Scale “Concretization - abstraction” - 10 answers a) and 3 answers b), which indicates the predominance of concretization, that is, the first signaling system.

Thus, client 1 has a neurotype, which at the psychological level is called “motor concretizing impulsive.” The presence of the word “motor” in the first place of the name of the neurotype indicates that this neurotype relates to extrajects (that is, it is oriented primarily to external factors), since the motor subsystem is part of the somatic nervous system.

At the neurophysiological level, client 1’s neurotype will have the following names:

• By and. 1 of the claims - motor.

• According to claim 2 of the invention formula - motor excitable.

• By and. 3 claims - motor first signal.

• According to claim 4 of the invention formula - motor primary-signal excitable.

Example 2. Client 2 answered the questions of the “Human Neurotype” questionnaire and received the following results:

• Scale “Extrajection - Introjection” - 6 answers a) and 1 answer b), which indicates the predominance of extrajection, that is, the somatic nervous system.

• “Motor - sensory” scale - 10 answers a) and 3 answers b), which indicates the predominance of his motor skills, that is, the motor nervous subsystem.

• “Impulsivity - stability” scale - 2 answers a) and 7 answers b), which indicates the predominance of stability, that is, the inhibition subsystem.

• Scale “Concretization - abstraction” - 11 answers a) and 2 answers b), which indicates the predominance of concretization, that is, the first signaling system.

Thus, client 2 has a neurotype, which at the psychological level is called “motor concretizing stable.” At the neurophysiological level, client neurotype 2 will have the following names:

• By and. 1 of the claims - motor.

• According to claim 2 of the invention formula - motor brake.

• According to claim 3 of the invention formula - motor primary signal. • According to claim 4 of the invention formula - motor first-signal brake.

Example 3. Client 3 answered the questions of the “Human Neurotype” questionnaire and received the following results:

• Scale “Extrajection - Introjection” - 4 answers a) and 3 answers b), which indicates the predominance of extrajection, that is, the somatic nervous system.

• “Motor - sensory” scale - 11 answers a) and 2 answers b), which indicates the predominance of his motor skills, that is, the motor nervous subsystem.

• “Impulsivity - stability” scale - 8 answers a) and 1 answer b), which indicates the predominance of impulsiveness, that is, the excitation subsystem.

• Scale “Concretization - abstraction” - 6 answers a) and 7 answers b), which indicates the predominance of abstraction, that is, the second signaling system.

Thus, client 3 has a neurotype, which at the psychological level is called “motor abstractive impulsive.” At the neurophysiological level, client neurotype 3 will have the following names:

• By and. 1 of the claims - motor.

• According to claim 2 of the invention formula - motor excitable.

• By and. 3 claims - motor secondary signal.

• According to claim 4 of the invention formula - motor second-signal excitable.

Example 4. Client 4 answered the questions of the “Human Neurotype” questionnaire and received the following results:

• Scale “Extrajection - Introjection” - 5 answers a) and 2 answers b), which indicates the predominance of extrajection, that is, the somatic nervous system. • “Motor - sensory” scale - 12 answers a) and 1 answer b), which indicates the predominance of his motor skills, that is, the motor nervous subsystem.

• “Impulsivity - stability” scale - 3 answers a) and 6 answers b), which indicates the predominance of stability, that is, the inhibition subsystem.

• Scale “Concretization - abstraction” - 2 answers a) and 11 answers b), which indicates the predominance of abstraction, that is, the second signaling system.

Thus, client 4 has a neurotype, which at the psychological level is called “motor abstracting stable.” At the neurophysiological level, client neurotype 4 will have the following names:

• By and. 1 of the claims - motor.

• According to claim 2 of the invention formula - motor brake.

• According to claim 3 of the invention formula - motor secondary signal.

• According to claim 4 of the invention formula - motor secondary signal brake.

Example 5. Client 5 answered the questions of the “Human Neurotype” questionnaire and received the following results:

• “Motor - sensory” scale - 1 answer a) and 12 answers b), which indicates the predominance of sensory, that is, the sensory nervous subsystem.

The “Impulsivity - Stability” scale - 8 answers a) and 1 answer b), which indicates the predominance of impulsiveness, that is, the excitation subsystem. • Scale “Concretization - abstraction” - 8 answers a) and 5 answers b), which indicates the predominance of concretization, that is, the first signaling system.

Thus, client 5 has a neurotype, which at the psychological level is called “sensory concretizing impulsive.” The presence of the word “sensory” in the first place of the name of the neurotype indicates that this neurotype belongs to extrajects (that is, focuses primarily on external factors), since the sensory subsystem is part of the somatic nervous system.

At the neurophysiological level, client neurotype 5 will have the following names:

• By and. 1 of the claims - touch.

• According to claim 2 of the invention formula - sensory excitable.

• By and. 3 claims - sensory first signal.

• According to claim 4 of the invention formula - sensory primary signal excitable.

Example 6. Client 6 answered the questions of the “Human Neurotype” questionnaire and received the following results:

• “Motor - sensory” scale - 2 answers a) and 11 answers b), which indicates the predominance of sensory, that is, the sensory nervous subsystem.

• Scale “Concretization - abstraction” - 10 answers a) and 3 answers b), which indicates the predominance of concretization, that is, the first signaling system. Thus, client 6 has a neurotype, which at the psychological level is called “sensory concretizing stable.” At the neurophysiological level, client neurotype 6 will have the following names:

• By and. 1 of the claims - touch.

• According to claim 2 of the invention formula - sensor brake.

• According to claim 3 of the invention formula - sensory primary signal.

• According to claim 4 of the invention formula - sensory first-signal brake.

Example 7. Client 7 answered the questions of the “Human Neurotype” questionnaire and received the following results:

• “Motor - sensory” scale - 4 answers a) and 9 answers b), which indicates the predominance of sensory, that is, the sensory nervous subsystem.

Thus, client 7 has a neurotype, which at the psychological level is called “sensory abstracting impulsive.” At the neurophysiological level, client 7’s neurotype will have the following names:

• By and. 1 of the claims - touch.

• According to claim 2 of the invention formula - sensory excitable.

• By and. 3 claims - sensory secondary signal. • According to claim 4 of the invention formula - sensory secondary signal excitable.

Example 8. Client 8 answered the questions of the “Human Neurotype” questionnaire and received the following results:

• Scale “Extrajection - Introjection” - 7 answers a) and 0 answers b), which indicates the predominance of extrajection, that is, the somatic nervous system.

• Scale “Concretization - abstraction” - 1 answer a) and 12 answers b), which indicates the predominance of abstraction, that is, the second signaling system.

Thus, client 8 has a neurotype, which at the psychological level is called “sensory abstracting stable.” At the neurophysiological level, client 8’s neurotype will have the following names:

• By and. 1 of the claims - touch.

• According to claim 2 of the invention formula - sensor brake.

• According to claim 3 of the invention formula - sensory secondary signal.

• According to claim 4 of the invention formula - sensory secondary signal brake.

Example 9. Client 9 answered the questions of the “Human Neurotype” questionnaire and received the following results:

• Scale “Extrajection - Introjection” - 2 answers a) and 5 answers b), which indicates the predominance of introjection, that is, the autonomic nervous system. • “Motor - sensory” scale - 10 answers a) and 3 answers b), which indicates the predominance of his motor skills, that is, the motor nervous subsystem.

Thus, client 9 has a neurotype, which at the psychological level is called “impulsive concretizing motor.” The presence of the word “impulsive” in the first place of the neurotype name indicates that this neurotype relates to introjects (that is, focuses primarily on internal factors), since the excitation subsystem is part of the autonomic nervous system.

At the neurophysiological level, client 9’s neurotype will have the following names:

• By and. 1 of the claims - excitable.

• By and. 2 claims - excitable motor.

• According to claim 3 of the invention formula - excitable primary signal.

• According to claim 4 of the invention formula - excitable first-signal motor.

Example 10. Client 10 answered the questions of the “Human Neurotype” questionnaire and received the following results:

• Scale “Extrajection - Introjection” - 3 answers a) and 4 answers b), which indicates the predominance of introjection, that is, the autonomic nervous system.

• “Motor - sensory” scale - 4 answers a) and 9 answers b), which indicates the predominance of sensory, that is, the sensory nervous subsystem. • “Impulsivity - stability” scale - 9 answers a) and 0 answers b), which indicates the predominance of impulsiveness, that is, the excitation subsystem.

• Scale “Concretization - abstraction” - 12 answers a) and 1 answer b), which indicates the predominance of concretization, that is, the first signaling system.

Thus, client 10 has a neurotype, which at the psychological level is called “impulsive concretizing sensory.” At the neurophysiological level, client 10’s neurotype will have the following names:

• By and. 1 of the claims - excitable.

• By and. 2 claims - excitable sensory.

• According to claim 3 of the invention formula - excitable primary signal.

• According to claim 4 of the formula of the invention - excitable first-signal sensory.

Example 11. Client 11 answered the questions of the “Human Neurotype” questionnaire and received the following results:

• Scale “Extrajection - Introjection” - 1 answer a) and 6 answers b), which indicates the predominance of introjection, that is, the autonomic nervous system.

• “Motor - sensory” scale - 8 answers a) and 5 answers b), which indicates the predominance of his motor skills, that is, the motor nervous subsystem.

• “Impulsivity - Stability” scale - 5 answers a) and 4 answers b), which indicates the predominance of impulsiveness, that is, the excitation subsystem.

• Scale “Concretization - abstraction” - 2 answers a) and 11 answers b), which indicates the predominance of abstraction, that is, the second signaling system. Thus, client 11 has a neurotype, which at the psychological level is called “impulsive abstractive motor.” At the neurophysiological level, client 11’s neurotype will have the following names:

• By and. 1 of the claims - excitable.

• By and. 2 claims - excitable motor.

• According to claim 3 of the invention formula - excitable secondary signal.

• According to claim 4 of the invention formula - excitable second-signal motor.

Example 12. Client 12 answered the questions of the “Human Neurotype” questionnaire and received the following results:

• Scale “Extrajection - Introjection” - 2 answers a) and 5 answers b), which indicates the predominance of introjection, that is, the autonomic nervous system.

• “Impulsivity - stability” scale - 9 answers a) and 0 answers b), which indicates the predominance of impulsiveness, that is, the excitation subsystem.

• Scale “Concretization - abstraction” - 5 answers a) and 8 answers b), which indicates the predominance of abstraction, that is, the second signaling system.

Thus, client 12 has a neurotype, which at the psychological level is called “impulsive abstracting sensory.” At the neurophysiological level, client 12’s neurotype will have the following names:

• By and. 1 of the claims - excitable.

• By and. 2 claims - excitable sensory.

• According to claim 3 of the invention formula - excitable secondary signal. • According to claim 4 of the invention formula - excitable second-signal sensory.

Example 13. Client 13 answered the questions of the “Human Neurotype” questionnaire and received the following results:

• Scale “Concretization - abstraction” - 13 answers a) and 0 answers b), which indicates the predominance of concretization, that is, the first signaling system.

Thus, client 13 has a neurotype, which at the psychological level is called “stable concretizing motor.” The presence of the word “stable” in the first place of the name of the neurotype indicates that this neurotype refers to introjects (that is, it focuses primarily on internal factors), since the inhibition subsystem is part of the autonomic nervous system.

At the neurophysiological level, client 13’s neurotype will have the following names:

• By and. 1 of the claims - brake.

• According to claim 2 of the invention formula - brake motor.

• According to claim 3 of the invention formula - brake first signal.

• According to claim 4 of the invention formula - brake first-signal motor. Example 14. Client 14 answered the questions of the “Human Neurotype” questionnaire and received the following results:

• “Impulsivity - stability” scale - 0 answers a) and 9 answers b), which indicates the predominance of stability, that is, the inhibition subsystem.

• Scale “Concretization - abstraction” - 8 answers a) and 5 answers b), which indicates the predominance of concretization, that is, the first signaling system.

Thus, client 14 has a neurotype, which at the psychological level is called “stable concretizing sensory.” At the neurophysiological level, client 14’s neurotype will have the following names:

• By and. 1 of the claims - brake.

• According to claim 2 of the invention formula - brake sensor.

• According to claim 3 of the invention formula - brake first signal.

• According to claim 4 of the formula of the invention - inhibitory first-signal sensory.

Example 15. Client 15 answered the questions of the “Human Neurotype” questionnaire and received the following results:

• “Impulsivity - stability” scale - 4 answers a) and 5 answers b), which indicates the predominance of stability, that is, the inhibition subsystem.

• Scale “Concretization - abstraction” - 3 answers a) and 10 answers b), which indicates the predominance of abstraction, that is, the second signaling system.

Thus, client 15 has a neurotype, which at the psychological level is called “stable abstract motor.” At the neurophysiological level, client 15’s neurotype will have the following names:

• By and. 1 of the claims - brake.

• According to claim 2 of the invention formula - brake motor.

• According to claim 3 of the invention formula - brake secondary signal.

• According to claim 4 of the invention formula - a brake secondary signal motor.

Example 16. Client 16 answered the questions of the “Human Neurotype” questionnaire and received the following results:

• “Impulsivity - stability” scale - 3 answers a) and 6 answers b), which indicates the predominance of stability, that is, the inhibition subsystem. • Scale “Concretization - abstraction” - 6 answers a) and 7 answers b), which indicates the predominance of abstraction, that is, the second signaling system.

Thus, client 16 has a neurotype, which at the psychological level is called “stable abstracting sensory.” At the neurophysiological level, client 16’s neurotype will have the following names:

• By and. 1 of the claims - brake.

• According to claim 2 of the invention formula - brake sensor.

• According to claim 3 of the invention formula - brake secondary signal.

• According to claim 4 of the invention formula - brake secondary signal sensor.

The use of the proposed solution increases the reliability (accuracy) of determining a person’s neurotype by using more than one neurophysiological dichotomous (bipolar) basis to identify a person’s type. In addition, the proposed solution expands the arsenal of technical tools designed to determine a person’s neurotype.

Claims

CLAIM

1. A method for determining the neurophysiological type of a person, including identifying in the autonomic nervous system the dominant subsystem from an interconnected pair: an excitation subsystem or an inhibition subsystem, characterized in that the dominant nervous subsystem from an interconnected pair is identified in the somatic nervous system: a sensory subsystem or a motor subsystem, identification the leading nervous system from an interconnected pair: the somatic or autonomic nervous system, and based on the predominant nervous structures, the neurotype is determined as:

• motor, if the somatic nervous system is leading and the motor nervous subsystem dominates;

• sensory, if the somatic nervous system is leading and the sensory nervous subsystem dominates;

• excitable, if the autonomic nervous system is leading and the excitation subsystem dominates;

• inhibitory, if the autonomic nervous system is leading and the inhibition subsystem dominates.

2. Method according to and. 1, characterized in that when determining the neurotype, the dominant nervous subsystem of the driven nervous system is additionally taken into account and the neurotype is determined as:

• motor excitable, if the leading one is the somatic nervous system, and the motor nervous subsystem and the excitation subsystem dominate;

• motor inhibitory, if the leading one is the somatic nervous system, and the motor nervous subsystem and the inhibitory subsystem dominate;

• sensory excitable, if the leading one is the somatic nervous system, and the sensory nervous subsystem and the excitation subsystem dominate;

32

SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) • sensory inhibitory, if the leading one is the somatic nervous system, and the sensory nervous subsystem and the inhibitory subsystem dominate;

• excitable motor, if the autonomic nervous system is leading, and the excitation subsystem and the motor nervous subsystem dominate;

• excitable sensory, if the leading one is the autonomic nervous system, and the excitation subsystem and the sensory nervous subsystem dominate;

• inhibitory motor, if the leading is the autonomic nervous system, and the inhibition subsystem and the motor nervous subsystem dominate;

• inhibitory sensory, if the leading one is the autonomic nervous system, and the inhibitory subsystem and the sensory nervous subsystem dominate.

3. Method according to and. 1, characterized in that they additionally identify the leading signaling system from an interconnected pair: the first or second signaling system, and determine the neurotype as:

• motor primary signal, if the motor nervous subsystem dominates, and the leading ones are the somatic nervous system and the first signaling system;

• motor secondary signal, if the motor nervous subsystem dominates, and the leading ones are the somatic nervous system and the second signaling system;

• sensory primary signal, if the sensory nervous subsystem dominates, and the leading ones are the somatic nervous system and the first signaling system;

• sensory secondary signal, if the sensory nervous subsystem dominates, and the leading ones are the somatic nervous system and the second signaling system;

33

SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) • excitable primary signal, if the excitation subsystem dominates, and the leading ones are the autonomic nervous system and the first signaling system;

• excitable secondary signal, if the excitation subsystem dominates, and the leading ones are the autonomic nervous system and the second signaling system;

• inhibitory first-signal, if the inhibition subsystem dominates, and the leading ones are the autonomic nervous system and the first signaling system;

• inhibitory secondary signal, if the inhibition subsystem dominates, and the leading ones are the autonomic nervous system and the second signaling system.

4. Method according to and. 1, characterized in that they additionally identify the leading signaling system from an interconnected pair: the first or second signaling system, and when determining the neurotype, the dominant nervous subsystem of the driven nervous system is additionally taken into account and the neurotype is determined as:

• motor primary signal excitable, if the leading ones are the somatic and first signaling systems, and the motor subsystem and the excitation subsystem dominate;

• motor first-signal inhibitory, if the leading ones are the somatic and first signal systems, and the motor subsystem and the inhibition subsystem are dominant;

• motor secondary signal excitable, if the leading ones are the somatic and second signaling systems, and the motor subsystem and the excitation subsystem dominate;

• motor secondary signal inhibitory, if the leading ones are the somatic and second signaling systems, and the motor subsystem and the inhibition subsystem are dominant;

34

SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) • sensory primary signal excitable, if the leading ones are the somatic and first signaling systems, and the sensory subsystem and the excitation subsystem dominate;

• sensory first-signal inhibitory, if the leading ones are the somatic and first signal systems, and the sensory subsystem and the inhibitory subsystem dominate;

• sensory secondary signal excitable, if the leading ones are the somatic and second signaling systems, and the sensory subsystem and the excitation subsystem dominate;

• sensory secondary signal inhibitory, if the leading ones are the somatic and second signaling systems, and the sensory subsystem and the inhibition subsystem are dominant;

• excitable first-signal motor, if the autonomic and first signal systems are leading, and the excitation subsystem and the motor nervous subsystem are dominant;

• excitable first-signal sensory, if the leading ones are the autonomic and first signal systems, and the excitation subsystem and the sensory nervous subsystem dominate;

• excitable secondary signal motor, if the leading ones are the autonomic and second signaling systems, and the excitation subsystem and the motor nervous subsystem dominate;

• excitable second-signal sensory, if the leading ones are the autonomic and second signaling systems, and the excitation subsystem and the sensory nervous subsystem dominate;

• inhibitory first-signal motor, if the autonomic and first signal systems are leading, and the inhibition subsystem and the motor nervous subsystem are dominant;

• inhibitory first-signal sensory, if the autonomic and first signal systems are leading, and the inhibition subsystem and the sensory nervous subsystem are dominant;

35

SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) • inhibitory secondary signal motor, if the autonomic and second signaling systems are leading, and the inhibition subsystem and the motor nervous subsystem are dominant;

• inhibitory secondary signal sensory, if the leading ones are the autonomic and second signaling systems, and the inhibition subsystem and the sensory nervous subsystem are dominant.

SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26)