+

WO2018175807A1 - Réduction d'artefacts dans une imagerie par résonance magnétique par création d'inhomogénéité dans le champ magnétique à une position de gradient zéro d'un système irm - Google Patents

Réduction d'artefacts dans une imagerie par résonance magnétique par création d'inhomogénéité dans le champ magnétique à une position de gradient zéro d'un système irm Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2018175807A1
WO2018175807A1 PCT/US2018/023884 US2018023884W WO2018175807A1 WO 2018175807 A1 WO2018175807 A1 WO 2018175807A1 US 2018023884 W US2018023884 W US 2018023884W WO 2018175807 A1 WO2018175807 A1 WO 2018175807A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
magnets
magnet
magnetic field
array
mri system
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2018/023884
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Thomas Chmielewski
Shmaryu Shvartsman
Original Assignee
Viewray Technologies, Inc.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Viewray Technologies, Inc. filed Critical Viewray Technologies, Inc.
Publication of WO2018175807A1 publication Critical patent/WO2018175807A1/fr

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01R—MEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
    • G01R33/00—Arrangements or instruments for measuring magnetic variables
    • G01R33/20—Arrangements or instruments for measuring magnetic variables involving magnetic resonance
    • G01R33/44—Arrangements or instruments for measuring magnetic variables involving magnetic resonance using nuclear magnetic resonance [NMR]
    • G01R33/48—NMR imaging systems
    • G01R33/54—Signal processing systems, e.g. using pulse sequences ; Generation or control of pulse sequences; Operator console
    • G01R33/56—Image enhancement or correction, e.g. subtraction or averaging techniques, e.g. improvement of signal-to-noise ratio and resolution
    • G01R33/565—Correction of image distortions, e.g. due to magnetic field inhomogeneities
    • G01R33/56563—Correction of image distortions, e.g. due to magnetic field inhomogeneities caused by a distortion of the main magnetic field B0, e.g. temporal variation of the magnitude or spatial inhomogeneity of B0
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01R—MEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
    • G01R33/00—Arrangements or instruments for measuring magnetic variables
    • G01R33/20—Arrangements or instruments for measuring magnetic variables involving magnetic resonance
    • G01R33/44—Arrangements or instruments for measuring magnetic variables involving magnetic resonance using nuclear magnetic resonance [NMR]
    • G01R33/48—NMR imaging systems
    • G01R33/54—Signal processing systems, e.g. using pulse sequences ; Generation or control of pulse sequences; Operator console
    • G01R33/56—Image enhancement or correction, e.g. subtraction or averaging techniques, e.g. improvement of signal-to-noise ratio and resolution
    • G01R33/565—Correction of image distortions, e.g. due to magnetic field inhomogeneities
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61N—ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
    • A61N5/00—Radiation therapy
    • A61N5/10—X-ray therapy; Gamma-ray therapy; Particle-irradiation therapy
    • A61N5/1048—Monitoring, verifying, controlling systems and methods
    • A61N5/1049—Monitoring, verifying, controlling systems and methods for verifying the position of the patient with respect to the radiation beam
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01R—MEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
    • G01R33/00—Arrangements or instruments for measuring magnetic variables
    • G01R33/20—Arrangements or instruments for measuring magnetic variables involving magnetic resonance
    • G01R33/28—Details of apparatus provided for in groups G01R33/44 - G01R33/64
    • G01R33/38—Systems for generation, homogenisation or stabilisation of the main or gradient magnetic field
    • G01R33/381—Systems for generation, homogenisation or stabilisation of the main or gradient magnetic field using electromagnets
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01R—MEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
    • G01R33/00—Arrangements or instruments for measuring magnetic variables
    • G01R33/20—Arrangements or instruments for measuring magnetic variables involving magnetic resonance
    • G01R33/28—Details of apparatus provided for in groups G01R33/44 - G01R33/64
    • G01R33/38—Systems for generation, homogenisation or stabilisation of the main or gradient magnetic field
    • G01R33/383—Systems for generation, homogenisation or stabilisation of the main or gradient magnetic field using permanent magnets
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61N—ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
    • A61N5/00—Radiation therapy
    • A61N5/10—X-ray therapy; Gamma-ray therapy; Particle-irradiation therapy
    • A61N5/1048—Monitoring, verifying, controlling systems and methods
    • A61N5/1049—Monitoring, verifying, controlling systems and methods for verifying the position of the patient with respect to the radiation beam
    • A61N2005/1055—Monitoring, verifying, controlling systems and methods for verifying the position of the patient with respect to the radiation beam using magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]

Definitions

  • Magnetic resonance imaging is a medical imaging technique that can be used in generating images of the interior of a patient, including healthy and diseased tissues.
  • MRI scanners typically use strong magnetic fields, radio waves, and field gradients to generate such images.
  • MRI systems are widely used by various medical facilities, such as hospitals, clinics, research facilities, etc.
  • a substantially uniform main magnetic field, Bo is created to cover the entire region of an area or volume to be imaged.
  • a subject may be positioned within an MRI scanner which forms the strong magnetic field.
  • protons hydrogen atoms
  • the static magnetic field tends to align the proton spins (e.g. their magnetic dipoles) in the direction of the field where they precess around the field's axis.
  • Energy from an oscillating magnetic field is temporarily applied to the patient at an appropriate resonant frequency to excite the protons, thereby causing a flip of their spin states.
  • the excited hydrogen atoms emit a radio frequency signal, which is measured by a receive coil.
  • the contrast between different tissues may be determined by the rate at which excited atoms return to the equilibrium state.
  • the current subject matter relates to an apparatus for reducing appearance of artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
  • the apparatus can include a magnetic field generating device configured to create an inhomogeneity (e.g., a distortion) in magnetic field of an MRI system and prevent at least one out-of-field excitation (i.e., artifacts or other distortions that can appear on an MRI image produced by the MRI system) during imaging.
  • the MRI system can include an imaging area and can generate a magnetic field characterized by a main magnetic field gradient.
  • the current subject matter can include one or more of the following optional features.
  • the magnetic field generating device can include at least one permanent magnet.
  • the magnetic field generating device can include at least one electromagnet.
  • the magnetic field generating device can include at least one array of magnets.
  • the array of magnets can be arranged on a belt.
  • the magnetic field generating device can be placed in a patient couch of the MRI system.
  • the magnetic field generating device can be mounted in a bore of the MRI system.
  • the magnetic field generating device and a gradient coil of the MRI system can be configured to generate a larger field of view where out-of-field excitations (e.g., artifacts) can occur.
  • a net near magnetic field of the array of magnets can be greater than its net far magnetic field.
  • the array of magnets can be positioned in the MRI system outside of the imaging area and corresponding to a location of an approximately null magnetic field gradient. Each magnet in the array of magnets can be positioned at a first distance away from an isocenter of the magnetic field generated by the MRI system.
  • a first magnet in the array of magnets can generate a magnetic field having a direction along a direction of the magnetic field of the MRI system.
  • a second magnet in the array of magnets can generate a magnetic field having a direction opposite the direction of the magnetic field of the MRI system.
  • the array of magnets can reduce appearance of the artifact in the image produced by the MRI system.
  • the current subject matter relates to a method for reducing an appearance of an artifact in an image generated by the MRI.
  • the method can include positioning an array of magnets in the MRI system outside of the imaging area and corresponding to a location of an approximately null magnetic field gradient.
  • the net near magnetic field of the array of magnets can be greater than its net far magnetic field.
  • Each magnet in the array of magnets can be positioned at a first distance away from an isocenter of the magnetic field generated by the MRI system.
  • the method can also include generating, using a first magnet in the array of magnets, a magnetic field having a direction along a direction of the magnetic field of the MRI system and, using a second magnet in the array of magnets, a magnetic field having a direction opposite the direction of the magnetic field of the MRI system. Further, the method can include reducing, using the array of magnets, an appearance of the artifact in the image produced by the MRI system.
  • the current subject matter can include one or more of the following optional features. At least one magnet in the array of magnets can be positioned in anti-parallel fashion to at least another magnet in the array of magnets.
  • the magnetic field gradient can include X and/or Y magnetic field gradients.
  • the array of magnets can be an array of alternating magnets. At least one magnet in the array of magnets can be oriented perpendicular to the magnetic field of the MRI system.
  • the first magnet and the second magnet can be positioned a second distance apart.
  • the second distance can be in a range of approximately 1 centimeter to approximately 7 centimeters.
  • the first distance can be in a range of approximately 20 centimeters to approximately 40 centimeters.
  • the first and second magnets in the array of magnets can be at least one of the following: identical magnets and different magnets.
  • the net near magnetic field of the array of magnets can extend approximately 3 centimeters to approximately 15 centimeters away from the array of magnets.
  • the strength of the magnetic field generated by the first magnet can be substantially equal to the strength of the magnetic field generated by the second magnet. This can produce a cancellation of the magnetic fields generated by the first magnet and the second magnet when the first magnet and the at least one second magnet are positioned at the first distance.
  • the first magnet and the second magnet can include at least one of the following: a permanent magnet, an electromagnet, a temporary magnet, a metal, an alloy, and any combination thereof.
  • the first magnet and the second magnet can be positioned proximate to gradient null outside the imaging area.
  • the artifact can include at least one of the following: an aliasing artifact, a spot, a band, a featherlike artifact, a cusp artifact, an annefact, a fold-over artifact, a feather artifact, a peripheral signal artifact, and any combination thereof.
  • the array of magnets can include a plurality of pairs of magnets, wherein magnets in each pair of magnets in the plurality of pairs of magnets are positioned apart from each other.
  • the array of magnets can be attached to a surface coil of the MRI system.
  • the magnetic field of the MRI system can be homogenous inside the imaging area of the MRI system based on the positioning of the array of magnets.
  • the array of magnets can be coupled to a pad, the pad being coupled to a surface coil of the MRI system.
  • the array of magnets can be configured to be coupled to a belt.
  • the belt can be configured to be attached to a subject (e.g., a patient) at a third distance from the location of the approximately null magnetic field gradient.
  • an apparatus in an interrelated aspect, includes a housing and an array of magnets contained in the housing.
  • the array of magnets have at least a first magnet and a second magnet arranged substantially anti-parallel to the first magnet.
  • the array of magnets can include magnet pairs having substantially anti-parallel magnets. In other variations, the array of magnets can include at least four magnet pairs having substantially anti-parallel magnets.
  • the housing can be configured to be at least partially flexible and to provide spacing between the first magnet and the second magnet.
  • the housing can include receptacles configured to contain at least the first magnet and the second magnet.
  • the receptacles can also be configured to facilitate removal, replacement, and reorientation of magnets contained therein.
  • the housing can include sections connected to cause the apparatus to be semi-flexible.
  • the sections can be are rigid and connected by one or more hinges.
  • the array of magnets can include at least one permanent magnet or at least one electromagnet.
  • the first magnet can be comprised of a metal that is substantially unmagnetized in the absence of an external magnetic field.
  • the metal can be steel.
  • the first magnet can be oriented such that it will be magnetized substantially anti-parallel to the second magnet by an external main magnetic field of a magnetic resonance imaging system.
  • the array of magnets can include pairs of magnets in a stacked configuration.
  • the pairs of magnets can also include at least three pairs of magnets.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates an exemplary split MRI system
  • FIG. 2 illustrates a cross-sectional view of the exemplary split MRI system shown in FIG. 1 ;
  • FIG. 3 illustrates general characteristics of a magnetic field
  • FIG. 4 illustrates exemplary gradient coils in an MRI system
  • FIG. 5 illustrates an exemplary system for attenuating/removing artifacts in a magnetic resonance imaging system, according to some implementations of the current subject matter
  • FIG. 6 illustrates an exemplary w-pairs of magnets system for attenuating/removing artifacts in a magnetic resonance imaging system, according to some implementations of the current subject matter
  • FIG. 7 illustrates an exemplary system for attenuating/removing artifacts in a magnetic resonance imaging system, according to some implementations of the current subject matter
  • FIGS. 8a-c illustrate an exemplary array of magnets, according to some implementations of the current subject matter
  • FIGS. 9a-c illustrate another exemplary array of magnets, according to some implementations of the current subject matter
  • FIGS. l Oa-b are plots that illustrate occurrence of a gradient null
  • FIG. 10c illustrates an exemplary plot illustrating a relationship between a slew- rate parameter and a uniformity parameter
  • FIGS. lOd-e illustrate exemplary plots of a vector field's (B) z-component versus z-position as a function of the uniformity parameter
  • FIG. 1 la illustrates an image that was generated by a conventional MRI system
  • FIG. l ib illustrates an exemplary image of the same object as in FIG. 11 a, which was generated using the current subj ect matter's system for attenuating/removing artifacts;
  • FIG. 12 is a flow chart illustrating an exemplary method, according to some implementations of the current subject matter
  • FIG. 13a illustrates an exemplary housing containing an array of magnets, according to some implementations of the present disclosure
  • FIG. 13b illustrates an exemplary arrangement of pairs of magnets arranged in a stacked configuration, according to some implementations of the present disclosure
  • FIG. 13c illustrates an exemplary arrangement of pairs of magnets arranged in an end-to-end configuration, according to some implementations of the present disclosure.
  • FIG. 14 illustrates the exemplary housing of FIG. 13a, conforming to the shape of a patient, according to some implementations of the present disclosure.
  • the current subject matter relates to an apparatus for reducing appearance of artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
  • the apparatus can include a magnetic field generating device configured to create an inhomogeneity in the magnetic field of an MRI system and prevent at least one out-of-field excitation (e.g., artifacts) during imaging.
  • the magnetic field generating device can include at least one permanent magnet, at least one electromagnet, and/or any other type of magnet(s) and/or any combination thereof.
  • the magnetic field generating device can include an array of magnets, which can be arranged on a belt. Further, the magnetic field generating device can be placed in a patient couch of the MRI system.
  • the magnetic field generating device can be mounted in a bore of the MRI system. Further, the gradient coil of the MRI system can be optimized to work with the magnetic field generating device to generate a larger field of view where out-of-field excitation can occur.
  • the current subject matter relates to a system and a method for reducing an appearance of an artifact in an image generated by a magnetic resonance imaging system.
  • the MRI system can include an imaging area and can generate a magnetic field that can be characterized by a main magnetic field gradient.
  • One or more magnets e.g., an array and/or pairs of magnets and/or any number of magnets
  • the magnet array can have a far magnetic field and a near magnetic field, where the near magnetic field can be greater than the far magnetic field, e.g., by orders of magnitude.
  • the magnets can be positioned in the MRI system outside of the imaging area and corresponding to a location of where X and Y field gradients are approximately null. Further, magnets can also be positioned at a distance away from an isocenter of the magnetic field of the MRI system. The magnets can be arranged to generate magnetic fields in opposite directions, which can produce a cancellation effect. The arrangement of magnets can cause reduction of appearance of artifacts in images produced by the MRI system. The artifacts are typically caused by signals generated in the area where X and / gradients are approximately null.
  • FIG. 1 shows a perspective view of an exemplary split or "open" MRI system 100.
  • the split MRI system 100 can include first and second magnet housings 102 and 104, which can be separated by a gap region 1 12.
  • An instrument 106 can be mounted in the gap region 112 on a gantry 108.
  • the instrument can include one or more radiation sources for delivering radiation to a target region.
  • a patient 110 can be positioned on a patient couch 114 inside of the first and second magnet housings 102, 104 and such that the gantry 108 can cause rotation of the instrument 106 to different positions relative to the patient 110 on the patient couch 114.
  • the gantry 108 can be used to reposition the instrument 106 about the patient 110 (e.g., at different angles of rotation about the Z-axis, as shown in FIG. 1).
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a single assembly of the instrument 106
  • the current subject matter can include multiple assemblies mounted on the gantry 108, such as for example, multiple radiation emitters, multi-leaf collimator devices, etc., and/or any combination thereof.
  • some implementations can include three radiation head assemblies (not shown in FIG. 1) mounted in the gap 112, distributed about the Z-axis, and rotatable about the Z-axis on the gantry 108.
  • the instrument 106 can include one or more radiation therapy devices, e.g., radiation sources and/or linear particle accelerators ("LINACs") and/or any type of instrument used with an MRI.
  • LINACs linear particle accelerators
  • FIG. 2 illustrates a cross-sectional view of the exemplary system 100 shown in FIG. 1.
  • the system 100 can be used to image a target region 202 (e.g., a volume and/or area within the patient (not shown in FIG. 2), which can be positioned above the patient couch 1 14, while the instrument 106 can be used to emit radiation 204 for simultaneously performing a treatment to the patient within a target region 202.
  • the system 100 can also include a radiofrequency transmit coil assembly 206 for transmitting radiofrequency ("RF") signals used for imaging.
  • the system 100 can further include a RF receive coil assembly 210 that extends across the gap 104.
  • the system 100 can also include additional components, such as, gradient coils, one or more shim coils, etc. (not shown in FIGS. 1 and 2).
  • the coordinate system used in the figures and throughout this disclosure refers to the longitudinal axis through the first and second magnet housings 102 and 104.
  • the X-axis extends perpendicular to the Z-axis and from side-to-side of the first and second magnet housings 102 and 104.
  • the 7-axis extends perpendicular to the X-axis and the Z-axis and from the bottom to the top of the first and second magnet housings 102 and 104.
  • the RF coil assembly 206 can extend between the instrument 106 and the target region 202.
  • the instrument 106 is a radiation emitting device (e.g., a device used with a radiotherapy system)
  • a portion of the RF coil assembly 206 can be in the path of the radiation 204 that directed from the instrument 106 toward the target region 202.
  • FIG. 3 illustrates general characteristics of a magnetic field, which are field direction and field strength.
  • a subject 302 can be positioned in the bore of the magnet 304.
  • a magnetic field can be visualized by a series of parallel lines 306, where the arrows A, B, C indicate direction of the magnetic field.
  • Electromagnets used for imaging produce a magnetic field that runs through the bore of the magnet and parallel to the major axis of the subj ect 302. As the magnetic field leaves the bore, it spreads out and encircles the magnet, thereby creating an external fringe field.
  • Magnetic field strengths of 0.15-3.0 T are typically used for imaging.
  • MRI systems typically require their main magnetic field to be very uniform or homogeneous. Field homogeneity depends on magnet design, adjustments, and environmental conditions. MRI systems usually require a homogeneity on the order of a few parts per million (ppm) within the imaging area.
  • FIG. 4 illustrates gradient coils in an MRI system.
  • the magnetic field is uniform/homogeneous over the region of the subject.
  • the magnetic field is distorted with gradients.
  • a gradient is a change in field strength from one point to another in the subject.
  • gradient coils are turned on (e.g., by applying an electric current), a gradient or variation in field strength is produced in the magnetic field.
  • a typical MRI system can have three separate sets of gradient coils, which are oriented so that gradients are produced in the three orthogonal directions (x, y, z). Two or more of the gradient coils can be used together to generate a gradient in a particular direction.
  • a gradient can be characterized by its strength, risetime, and slew-rate.
  • a gradient's strength can be expressed in terms of a change in the magnetic field strength per distance (e.g., mT/m).
  • a gradient's risetime is a time required for a gradient to reach its maximum strength and slew- rate is a rate at which the gradient changes with time.
  • gradient coils 402 are generating gradient in an x-direction; gradient coils 404 are generating a gradient in a ⁇ -direction; and gradient coils 406 are generating a gradient in a z-direction.
  • gradient coils are wrapped or pre-printed around a cylindrical surface. Gradient fields distort the main magnetic field in according to a partem, which can allow spatial encoding of the magnetic resonance signal.
  • Images produced by the MRI system during the imaging process can contain various artifacts.
  • An artifact can be a distortion in the produced image.
  • Artifacts can be caused by various subject-related factors, e.g., voluntary and physiologic motion, metallic implants and/or foreign bodies. Artifacts and foreign bodies within the subject's body can be confused with pathology and/or can reduce the quality of an examination.
  • artifacts e.g., a truncation artifact, a motion artifact, an aliasing artifact, etc.
  • artifacts can be caused by breathing, cardiac movement, foreign bodies found on and/or in subject's body, etc.
  • FIGS. lOa-b illustrate occurrences of a gradient null.
  • FIG. 10a is a plot 1000 illustrating an (and Y) gradient strength as a function of z position for single x position.
  • a gradient "fall off or "axial rollover” begins to occur.
  • the main magnetic field continues to be uniform, thereby producing a substantial signal. This can cause formation of artifacts within the area of interest when certain scanning techniques are used.
  • the artifacts produced in Cartesian imaging can include cusp artifacts, annefacts, foldover artifacts, feather artifacts, peripheral signal artifacts, etc.
  • non-Cartesian (e.g., real time spiral and radial) imaging the artifacts can be much more apparent, which results in lines throughout the produced image, as for example shown in FIG. 11a.
  • the current subject matter seeks to eliminate signals near the gradient null zones, and to thereby reduce appearance of artifacts.
  • the current subject matter can reduce and/or eliminate the above artifacts by manipulating a magnetic field near the undesired signal to minimize effects of the undesired signal.
  • the magnetic field can be manipulated in many fashions to produce the desired result.
  • the current subject matter can implement various methods to manipulate the magnetic field outside of the desired imaging area (near the gradient null), while minimally affecting the magnetic field within the imaging area.
  • Some implementations can include designing the gradient coil, or controlling operation of the gradient coil, to cause the gradient null area to be positioned axially towards or away from the isocenter (for example further out than illustrated in the figures of the present disclosure).
  • moving the gradient null area to an axial location further from the isocenter can reduce the appearance of artifacts.
  • the gradient coil of the MRI system can be optimized for the purposes of generating a larger field of view where out-of-field excitations can occur.
  • a field of view in the MRI system can be defined as a size of 2D or 3D spatial encoding area of an image produced by the MRI system.
  • the field of view can be an area that can include an object of interest for imaging. The smaller the field of view, the higher the resolution and the smaller the voxel size and the lower the measured signal.
  • magnetic field homogeneity can decrease as more area/tissue is imaged (i.e., corresponding to a larger field of view). Magnetic field homogeneity can be measured in parts per million (ppm) over a particular diameter of spherical volume (DSV) and can correspond to a uniformity of a magnetic field in the center of the scanner when no object is present.
  • ppm parts per million
  • DSV spherical volume
  • optimization of the gradient coil can be based on a uniformity parameter.
  • the uniformity parameter can be defined as a ratio of gradient strengths at a particular point in the field of view. It can be represented by a slope of a curve (e.g., curves shown in FIGS. l Oa-b) defining how "fast" the "axial rollover" of a z-component of the magnetic field (B) can occur along the z-axis.
  • uniformity parameter ⁇ ⁇ ° ' ° ⁇ (1)
  • FIG. 10c illustrates an exemplary plot 1020 illustrating a relationship between a slew-rate parameter and the uniformity parameter.
  • the slew-rate i.e., rate at which the gradient changes with time
  • current / 51 OA
  • voltage V 1800V.
  • the slew-rate appears to peak when the uniformity parameter is approximately 0.77-0.78.
  • FIG. lOd illustrates an exemplary plot 1030 (and FIG. lOe illustrates an enlargement 1040 of a portion of the plot 1030) of a vector field's (B) z-component versus z-position as a function of the uniformity parameter.
  • the uniformity parameter can be used to ascertain and/or optimize performance of the gradient coil. For example, as shown in FIGS. lOc-e, for a transverse gradient (X or Y gradient), the uniformity parameter can be used to determine performance of a gradient coil for a particular gradient strength as well as determine spatial constraints (e.g., diameter, length, etc.) of the coil.
  • FIG. 5 illustrates an exemplary system 500 for attenuating/removing artifacts in a magnetic resonance imaging system, according to some implementations of the current subject matter.
  • the system 500 can include a pair of magnets (and/or an array of magnets and/or any number of magnets) 502, 504.
  • the magnets 502, 504 can be permanent magnets.
  • the net near fields of the array or the permanent magnets can be configured to be strong and their net far fields configured to be weak.
  • the magnets 502, 504 can be positioned apart.
  • the magnets 502, 504 can be identical.
  • each magnet in the n pairs and/or an array of magnets 502, 504 (n is an integer greater than or equal to 1, greater than 4, etc.) can be spaced a distance apart from another magnet.
  • the distance between the magnets can be experimentally determined (e.g., based on magnetic fields of the magnets, specifications of the system, images sought to be produced, etc.).
  • one of the magnets 502, 504 can have its magnetic field aligned with the MRI systems' main magnetic field (not shown in FIG. 5) and the other one of the magnets 502, 504 (e.g., magnet 504) can have its magnetic field aligned opposite to the MRI system's main magnetic field.
  • one of the magnets in each pair can have its magnetic field aligned with the main magnetic field, while the other magnet in each pair can have its magnetic field be opposite the main magnetic field.
  • the magnets can be alternately positioned so that there is a strong effect in the gradient null area while having little or no effect in the imaging area.
  • a separation between magnets 502, 504 can be so selected to optimize the performance (i.e., removal of artifacts).
  • the magnets 502, 504 can be positioned around an area 506 where the gradient field converges.
  • the magnets 502, 504 can be positioned 20-40 cm from an isocenter in the HF direction. Additionally, a distance between the magnets 502, 504 can also be selected to optimize performance (i.e., removal of artifacts).
  • the magnets can have a size of 1 inch by 1 ⁇ 2 inches by 1/8 inches.
  • the magnets can be spaced 50 mm apart.
  • Some magnets e.g., at the end of an array of magnets (as discussed below) can be smaller (e.g., 1 ⁇ 2 of the above main magnets) and can be spaced 25 mm apart.
  • any sizes and/or spacing of magnets can be implemented.
  • each pair of magnets can also be spaced apart from another pair of magnets, as desired (e.g., based on magnetic fields of the magnets, specifications of the system, images sought to be produced, etc.). Further, the magnet pairs can be rigidly fixed relative to one another to ensure cancellation of the forces produced by a single magnet.
  • FIG. 6 illustrates an exemplary magnet system 600 for attenuating/removing artifacts in a magnetic resonance imaging system, according to some implementations of the current subject matter.
  • the system 600 can be configured to create an inhomogeneity in magnetic field of the MRI system and thereby prevent at least one out-of-field excitation during imaging.
  • the magnets (and/or magnet polarity) of one or more magnet pairs can be arranged in an anti-parallel (or substantially anti-parallel) way, where the orientation and/or polarity of one of the magnets is substantially opposite the orientation and/or polarity of another magnet.
  • magnet 604a and 604b are illustrated as being substantially anti-parallel to magnets 606a and 606b, respectively.
  • the term “substantially” means that the feature it modifies need not be exact.
  • the term “substantially anti-parallel” contemplates that the magnets are oriented to be nearly anti-parallel, but allows for some small deviations due to construction errors, design choices, and the like.
  • the magnets e.g., including a first magnet and a second magnet
  • the magnets can be oriented side-by-side (i.e., not end-to- end) to cause a north pole of the first magnet to be closer to a south pole of the second magnet than to a north pole of the second magnet.
  • one magnet's magnetic field can be aligned with the main magnetic field of the MRI system and the other magnet's magnetic field can be substantially opposite of the main magnetic field.
  • the array can have w-pairs of magnets or any number of magnets.
  • the system 600 can include an array housing 602 that contain magnets 604 (a, b, c) and 606(a, b).
  • the magnets 604 and 606 can be arranged in a semi-circular array, as illustrated in FIG. 6.
  • the magnets can be arranged in any desired housing, pattern, array, and/or any combination thereof.
  • a belt e.g., flexible, rigid, semi-flexible, and/or semi-rigid
  • the array housing 602 can be manufactured from any desired material, e.g., plastic, cloth, metal, etc.
  • the magnets can be loose within the array housing 602 and/or can be permanently secured to the array housing 602 in any desired fashion (e.g., glued, welded, using snaps, hooks, etc.).
  • the housing is constructed in a manner to substantially maintain a particular orientation and relative location of the magnets therein.
  • Magnets 604, 606 can be the same size and have same magnetic properties. Alternatively, the magnets 604, 606 can have varying sizes and/or varying magnetic properties.
  • the array housing 602 can be configured to have magnets 604, 606 spaced apart. The distances separating each magnet can be the same and/or can vary from one pair of magnets to the next.
  • the system 600 is not limited to the arrangement shown in FIG. 6. In particular, the magnets can be arranged in any desired fashion, using any type of housing, and the system 600 can include any number of magnets. Further, the magnets and/or pairs of magnets can be separated by any desired distances.
  • the arrangement of magnets, the number of magnets, the distances separating the magnets, the strengths of the magnets' magnetic fields, the type of housing that can contain the magnets, etc. can be based on an effect that is desired to be achieved, images sought to be produced, particular artifacts to be removed or reduced, specifications of the MRI system, etc.
  • the arrangement of magnets, the number of magnets, the distances separating the magnets, the strengths of the magnets' magnetic fields, the type of housing that can contain the magnets, etc. can be optimized in order to reduce and/or suppress occurrence of artifacts.
  • the magnets (and/or magnet pairs and/or array(s) of magnets, etc.) can also be placed perpendicular to the main field.
  • each magnet can be dependent on the field that is to be disturbed, the imaging area, etc.
  • any number of magnets 604, 606 in the array 602 can be used to achieve a desired effect.
  • perpendicular (and/or radial) positioning of the magnets with respect to the main magnet field can produce an improved performance as compared to when magnets are oriented parallel to the main field (as, for example, is shown in and discussed with respect to FIGS. 8a-9c).
  • magnets 604, 606 can be arranged in an anti-parallel fashion in the array housing 602.
  • the net near fields of the magnets 604, 604 can be strong, while their net far fields can be weak.
  • magnets 604 can be arranged to have their magnetic field to be along the main magnetic field of the MRI system (not shown in FIG. 6).
  • magnets 606 can be arranged to have their magnetic field to be opposite the main magnetic field of the MRI system.
  • Such positioning and the nature of the magnetic fields of magnets 604, 606 can produce a cancellation effect, whereby the main imaging area is not affected by the presence of magnets 604, 606 in the array housing 602 and the presence of produced imaging artifacts is substantially reduced and/or eliminated.
  • the magnets can be positioned at a desired location on a surface coil of the MRI system (not shown in FIG. 6). This can ensure that the field being disturbed is the correct field relative to the location of the imaging area.
  • the magnets can be positioned in a band or a belt that can be placed around the patient at the desired location (see, for example, FIG. 14).
  • the magnets can be positioned in a patient couch of the MRI system.
  • the magnets can be mounted in a bore of the MRI system.
  • the gradient coil of the MRI system can be optimized in relation to the magnets so a larger field of view, where out-of-field excitation can occur, can be generated.
  • one or more electromagnets can be used instead of the permanent magnets.
  • a combination of magnets and other non- magnetized metals, such as steel or other ferromagnetic materials can be used.
  • some implementations can include a second magnet (e.g., of any of the pairs of magnets) being a metal that can be magnetized substantially anti-parallel to the first magnet (in the pair of magnets) in response to an external magnetic field (e.g., the main MRI magnetic field).
  • the second magnet is a metal that is not initially a magnet, the second magnet can therefore be substantially unmagnetized in the absence of the external magnetic field.
  • the second magnet (which is not generally considered a magnetic material) may retain some magnetization.
  • incidental magnetization i.e., being substantially unmagnetized
  • the first magnet which can be a permanent magnet, or small compared to the magnetic field generated during typical operation of an electromagnet (when the first magnet is such).
  • a permanent magnet can be included such that it is oriented to have a magnetization against (e.g., in the opposite direction of) the main magnetic field.
  • another element comprising a material that can be magnetized, such as steel, can placed such that it is magnetized along the main magnetic field, by the MRI's main magnetic field.
  • the arrangement can continue by the addition of a second permanent magnet having the same magnetization as the first permanent magnet, and so on.
  • the magnetization of the permanent magnets can be axial (e.g., substantially anti-parallel to the main magnetic field).
  • FIG. 7 illustrates an exemplary system 700 for attenuating/removing artifacts in a magnetic resonance imaging system, according to some implementations of the current subject matter.
  • the system 700 can include an imaging area 704 and have a plurality of magnets 702 that can be arranged in a disc-like fashion, as shown by the discs 710, 712.
  • the magnets can be arranged in any other fashion (e.g., using a belt that can be wrapped around the subject, etc.).
  • the magnets can be positioned in an anti-parallel fashion (i.e., parallel to each other but in opposite directions).
  • the magnets 702 can be positioned at a location that can correspond to the where the main magnetic field gradient is approximately zero or null.
  • the pairs of magnets 702 can have a far magnetic field and a near magnetic field.
  • the near magnetic field can be greater than the far magnetic field (e.g., by orders of magnitude).
  • the array of magnets 702 can be arranged at a distance from an isocenter in the direction of the main magnetic field. In some exemplary, non-limiting implementations, such distance can be approximately 30 cm. Further, the magnets can be positioned approximately 1- 7 centimeters apart from each other.
  • the pairs of magnets 702 can perturb the magnetic field in the area 706 of the disc 710 (similarly for the pairs of magnets arranged in the disc 712).
  • the area 706 corresponds to a gradient null area. This is the area where gradients collapse, thereby generating an image artifact.
  • the resulting field generated by the magnets can be approximately zero, thereby not affecting the imaging area 704.
  • the number, size, distance, and/or orientation of the array of magnets can be adjusted to optimize local effects and/or to minimize perturbation in the imaging area.
  • the array of magnets can be arranged to have a substantially large local field (e.g., in a range >100ppm) that can penetrate approximately 5- 10cm into the area 706, while having less than 5ppm perturbation into the imaging area 704 (e.g., 35cm).
  • the net near magnetic field of the array of magnets can extend approximately 3 centimeters to approximately 15 centimeters away from the array of magnets.
  • the array of magnets can be positioned approximately 20 centimeters to approximately 40 centimeters away from an isocenter of the main magnetic field and outside of the imaging area 704 and corresponding to a location where the X and/or Y field gradient(s) is approximately zero or null.
  • the magnets in the array of magnets 702 can be at least one of the following: identical magnets and different magnets. Further, the strength of the magnetic field generated by each magnet can be substantially equal to the strength of the magnetic field generated by the other magnet. This can produce a cancellation of the magnetic fields generated by both magnets at particular locations.
  • the magnets in the array of magnets 702 can include at least one of the following: a permanent magnet, an electromagnet, a temporary magnet, a metal, an alloy, and any combination thereof.
  • the artifacts that the pairs of magnets can attenuate can include at least one of the following: an aliasing artifact, a spot, a band, a featherlike artifact, a cusp artifact, an annefact, a fold-over artifact, a feather artifact, a peripheral signal artifact, any signal artifact resulting from un-encoded signal at the X and Y gradient nulls, and/or any combination thereof.
  • the array of magnets 702 (as shown in FIG. 7) can be positioned at a given distance apart from each other.
  • pairs of magnets can be positioned in an array.
  • one or more pairs and/or alternating arrays of magnets can be attached to a surface coil of the MRI system.
  • positioning of the pairs of magnets 702 can allow the main magnetic field to be homogenous inside the imaging area 704 of the MRI system.
  • FIGS. 8a-c illustrate an exemplary array of magnets 804 and 806(a, b) that are oriented radially and arranged around a gradient null area 802 (shown in a form of a disc), where the magnets 806 can be disposed at both ends of the array and can be approximately half the size of the magnets 804.
  • These magnets as shown in FIGS. 8a-c, can be oriented radially (i.e., perpendicular to Z) and in an alternating fashion.
  • the magnets 804, 806 can be permanent magnets having a relatively strong near magnetic field (e.g., causing approximately 6706 ppm perturbation on the area 802) and a relatively weak far magnetic field (e.g., causing approximately 1.76 ppm perturbation on the area 808 (shown as a sphere in FIGS. 8b-c)).
  • the magnets 804, 806 can be arranged in an anti-parallel fashion, e.g., some magnets can be arranged to have their magnetic field aligned with the direction of the main magnetic field and others can be arranged so that their magnetic field is opposite the direction of the main magnet field. Further, as shown in FIG. 8a, the magnets 804, 806 can be oriented radially or perpendicular to the z-direction.
  • magnets 806(a,b) can be configured to cancel out far field effects on each end of the array of magnets. These smaller magnets can be placed at the edge of the magnet array such that the edge effects of the magnet array are partly or substantially cancelled in the imaging area.
  • “Far-field” or “edge” effects can include magnetic fields that are generally not cancelled by paired magnets as described herein. For example, as described herein, two adjacent anti-parallel magnets can have a general field-cancellation effect between them. But on the outside of the pair (e.g., at an "edge") there may not be cancellation. This "edge effect" can be partially mitigated by providing the smaller magnet, to provide some degree of cancellation, and to thus decrease the severity of the edge effect.
  • the smaller magnet can be physically smaller, have a reduced field strength (e.g., 1 ⁇ 2, 1 ⁇ 4, 1/10, etc.) as compared to the other magnets in the apparatus, or a combination of the two.
  • FIGS. 9a-c illustrate another exemplary array of magnets 904 and 906(a, b) that are oriented along a Z direction and arranged around a gradient null area 902 (shown in a form of a disc), where the magnets 906 can be disposed at both ends of the array and can be approximately half the size of the magnets 904.
  • the magnets 904, 906 can be oriented parallel or along the z-direction (which can, in some cases, be the direction of the MRI magnetic field). Similar to magnets shown in FIGS.
  • the magnets 904, 906 can be permanent magnets having a relatively strong near magnetic field (e.g., causing approximately 1714 ppm perturbation on the area 902) and a relatively weak far magnetic field (e.g., causing approximately 6.86 ppm perturbation on the area 908 (shown as a sphere in FIGS. 9b-c)).
  • the magnets 904, 906 can be arranged in an anti-parallel fashion, e.g., some magnets can be arranged to have their magnetic field aligned with the direction of the main magnetic field and others can be arranged so that their magnetic field is opposite the direction of the main magnet field.
  • the magnets 906 can be configured to cancel out far field effects on each end of the array of magnets.
  • FIG. 1 1 a illustrates an image 1 102 that was generated by a conventional MRI system.
  • the image 1 102 includes artefacts (e.g., lines, white spots, etc.).
  • FIG. l ib illustrates an exemplary image 1 104 of the same object as in FIG. 1 1a (i.e., image 1102), which was generated using the current subject matter's system for attenuating/removing artifacts. As shown in FIG. l ib, the artifacts that were present in the image 1102 are absent from image 1104.
  • FIG. 12 illustrates an exemplary method 1200 for reducing an appearance of an artifact (which can be caused by a signal produced in the X and Y gradients' null area, as discussed above) in an image generated by a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system.
  • the MRI system can include an imaging area and can generate a magnetic field characterized by a main magnetic field gradient.
  • the method 1200 can be performed by a magnetic field generating device, which can include one or more magnets (e.g., a pair of magnets, an array of magnets, etc.), as discussed above.
  • the magnetic field generating device can create an inhomogeneity in the MRI magnetic field.
  • the device can prevent at least one out-of- field excitation during imaging process performed by the MRI system.
  • the magnetic field generating device can include at least one permanent magnet, at least one electromagnet, etc., and/or any combination thereof.
  • the magnetic field generating device can include at least one array of magnets.
  • the array of magnets can be arranged on a belt.
  • the magnetic field generating device can be configured to be placed within a patient couch of an MRI system.
  • the magnetic field generating device can be mounted in a bore of the MRI system.
  • the magnetic field generating device and a gradient coil of the MRI system can be configured to generate a larger field of view where out-of-field excitation can occur.
  • the magnetic field generating device includes an array of magnets (e.g., 2 or more magnets)
  • the array can be positioned in the MRI system outside of the imaging area and corresponding to a location, where X and Y magnetic field gradient(s) are approximately zero.
  • the array's net near magnetic field can be greater than its net far magnetic field by orders of magnitude.
  • Magnets in the array of magnets can be positioned at a first distance away from an isocenter of the magnetic field generated by the MRI system.
  • a first magnet in the array can generate a magnetic field having a direction along a direction of the main magnetic field gradient and a second magnet can generate a magnetic field having a direction opposite the direction of the main magnetic field gradient.
  • the array of magnets can reduce an appearance of the artifact in the image produced by the MRI system.
  • At least one magnet in the array can be positioned in anti-parallel fashion to at least another magnet in the array of magnets.
  • the magnetic field gradient can include X and/or Y magnetic field gradients.
  • the array can be an array of alternating magnets. At least one magnet in the array can be oriented perpendicular to the magnetic field of the MRI system.
  • the first magnet and the second magnet can be positioned a second distance apart.
  • the second distance can be in a range of approximately 1 centimeter to approximately 7 centimeters.
  • the first distance can be in a range of approximately 20 centimeters to approximately 40 centimeters.
  • the first and second magnets in the array can be at least one of the following: identical magnets and different magnets.
  • the net near magnetic field of the array can extend approximately 3 centimeters to approximately 15 centimeters away from the array.
  • the strength of the magnetic field generated by the first magnet can be substantially equal to the strength of the magnetic field generated by the second magnet. This can produce a cancellation of the magnetic fields generated by the first magnet and the second magnet when the first magnet and the second magnet are positioned at the first distance.
  • the first magnet and the second magnet can include at least one of the following: a permanent magnet, an electromagnet, a temporary magnet, a metal, an alloy, and any combination thereof.
  • the first magnet and the second magnet can be positioned proximate to a gradient null, which may be outside the imaging area or inside the imaging area.
  • proximate such as proximate to a gradient null
  • proximate to a gradient null means that such a proximate position is aligned with or corresponding to the location of a gradient null, but need not be precisely at that location.
  • the array of magnets can include a plurality of pairs of magnets, wherein magnets in each pair of magnets in the plurality of pairs of magnets are positioned apart from each other.
  • the array of magnets can be attached to a surface coil of the MRI system.
  • the array of magnets can be coupled to a pad, the pad being coupled to a surface coil of the MRI system.
  • the array of magnets can be configured to be coupled to a belt.
  • the belt can be configured to be attached to a subject (e.g., a patient) proximate the location of the approximately null magnetic field gradient.
  • FIG. 13a illustrates an exemplary housing 1300 containing an array of magnets 1330, according to some implementations of the present disclosure.
  • the array of magnets 1330 may be implemented as an apparatus positioned within an MRI during imaging. Such implementations can be placed at locations proximate to a gradient null area of the MRI system.
  • the exemplary apparatus of FIG. 13 can include a housing 1300 and array of magnets 1330 contained in the housing.
  • Array of magnets 1330 can have at least a first magnet and a second magnet arranged substantially anti-parallel to the first magnet.
  • Also shown in FIG. 13a is an exemplary orientation of main magnetic field 1360.
  • Main magnetic field 1360 illustrates that array of magnets 1330 (shown with north (N) and south (S) poles) can be oriented substantially along main magnetic field 1360.
  • the polarities shown in Fig. 13a are non-limiting examples.
  • Main magnetic field 1360 can be in other directions and the polarity of magnets 1330 can be in any direction consistent with the instant disclosure.
  • Housing 1300 can be configured to be at least partially flexible and to provide spacing between the magnets contained therein.
  • housing 1300 can also include receptacles 1320 for the magnets.
  • the receptacles may be configured to facilitate removal, replacement and reorientation of the magnets contained therein, or can alternatively be configured to permanently receive the magnets.
  • the recesses 1320 are cylindrically shaped, though any other shape can be used to receive an appropriately shaped magnet.
  • Certain implementations may contain holes 1340 extending through an outer surface of housing 1300 to allow air to escape when adding or removing magnets from the recesses (i.e., avoiding pressurized air pockets or vacuums), and to facilitate the removal of magnets by pushing them out with an instrument inserted into holes 1340.
  • sections 1310 can be rigid sections that hold the magnets. Sections 1310 may be connected in a manner allowing the apparatus to be semi-flexible. In some implementations, sections 1310 can be flexibly connected by, for example, hinges 1350, flexible fabric, flexible plastic, rubber, etc.
  • FIG. 13b illustrates an exemplary arrangement of pairs of magnets arranged in a "stacked" configuration 1370, according to some implementations of the present disclosure.
  • FIG. 13c illustrates an exemplary arrangement of pairs of magnets arranged in an "end-to-end” configuration 1380, according to some implementations of the present disclosure. Any number or combination of pairs of magnets can be arranged in a stacked configuration or in an end-to- end configuration.
  • a stacked configuration 1370 means a configuration where the directions of the poles of the pairs of magnets are substantially not aligned with the adjacent magnet pairs in the stack.
  • an end-to-end configuration 1380 means that the ends of the magnet pairs are arranged such that the poles of the pairs of magnets are more aligned with adjacent magnet pairs.
  • FIG. 13a illustrates an example of an array of magnets 1330 in a stacked configuration.
  • FIG. 14 illustrates the exemplary apparatus 1300 of FIG. 13a conforming to the shape of a patient according to some implementations of the present disclosure.
  • the apparatus can be placed proximate the location of a magnetic null, shown in FIG. 14 as area 802.
  • the housing 1300 and its array of magnets 1330 may be placed in other locations proximate the gradient null, as described herein.
  • One or more aspects or features of the subject matter described herein can be realized in digital electronic circuitry, integrated circuitry, specially designed application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) computer hardware, firmware, software, and/or combinations thereof.
  • ASICs application specific integrated circuits
  • FPGAs field programmable gate arrays
  • These various aspects or features can include implementation in one or more computer programs that are executable and/or interpretable on a programmable system including at least one programmable processor, which can be special or general purpose, coupled to receive data and instructions from, and to transmit data and instructions to, a storage system, at least one input device, and at least one output device.
  • the programmable system or computing system may include clients and servers.
  • a client and server are generally remote from each other and typically interact through a communication network. The relationship of client and server arises by virtue of computer programs running on the respective computers and having a client-server relationship to each other.
  • machine-readable signal refers to any signal used to provide machine instructions and/or data to a programmable processor.
  • the machine-readable medium can store such machine instructions non-transitorily, such as for example as would a non-transient solid-state memory or a magnetic hard drive or any equivalent storage medium.
  • the machine-readable medium can alternatively or additionally store such machine instructions in a transient manner, such as for example as would a processor cache or other random access memory associated with one or more physical processor cores.
  • one or more aspects or features of the subject matter described herein can be implemented on a computer having a display device, such as for example a cathode ray tube (CRT) or a liquid crystal display (LCD) or a light emitting diode (LED) monitor for displaying information to the user and a keyboard and a pointing device, such as for example a mouse or a trackball, by which the user may provide input to the computer.
  • a display device such as for example a cathode ray tube (CRT) or a liquid crystal display (LCD) or a light emitting diode (LED) monitor for displaying information to the user
  • LCD liquid crystal display
  • LED light emitting diode
  • a keyboard and a pointing device such as for example a mouse or a trackball
  • feedback provided to the user can be any form of sensory feedback, such as for example visual feedback, auditory feedback, or tactile feedback; and input from the user may be received in any form, including, but not limited to, acoustic, speech, or tactile input.
  • Other possible input devices include, but are not limited to, touch screens or other touch- sensitive devices such as single or multi-point resistive or capacitive trackpads, voice recognition hardware and software, optical scanners, optical pointers, digital image capture devices and associated interpretation software, and the like.
  • phrases such as "at least one of or "one or more of may occur followed by a conjunctive list of elements or features.
  • the term “and/or” may also occur in a list of two or more elements or features. Unless otherwise implicitly or explicitly contradicted by the context in which it used, such a phrase is intended to mean any of the listed elements or features individually or any of the recited elements or features in combination with any of the other recited elements or features.
  • the phrases “at least one of A and ⁇ ;” “one or more of A and ⁇ ;” and “A and/or B” are each intended to mean "A alone, B alone, or A and B together.”
  • a similar interpretation is also intended for lists including three or more items.
  • the phrases "at least one of A, B, and C;” “one or more of A, B, and C;” and “A, B, and/or C” are each intended to mean “A alone, B alone, C alone, A and B together, A and C together, B and C together, or A and B and C together.”
  • Use of the term “based on,” above and in the claims is intended to mean, “based at least in part on,” such that an unrecited feature or element is also permissible.

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Condensed Matter Physics & Semiconductors (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Radiology & Medical Imaging (AREA)
  • Nuclear Medicine, Radiotherapy & Molecular Imaging (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • High Energy & Nuclear Physics (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Electromagnetism (AREA)
  • Pathology (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging Apparatus (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention concerne des appareils, des procédés et des produits programmes d'ordinateur servant à réduire l'apparition d'un artefact, tel qu'un artefact de pointe, un annefact, un artefact de repliement, un artefact de plume ou un artefact de signal périphérique dans une image générée par un système d'imagerie par résonance magnétique (IRM). L'appareil comprend un dispositif de génération de champ magnétique conçu pour créer une inhomogénéité dans le champ magnétique à une position de gradient zéro d'un système IRM et pour empêcher au moins une excitation hors champ pendant l'imagerie.
PCT/US2018/023884 2017-03-22 2018-03-22 Réduction d'artefacts dans une imagerie par résonance magnétique par création d'inhomogénéité dans le champ magnétique à une position de gradient zéro d'un système irm WO2018175807A1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201762474963P 2017-03-22 2017-03-22
US62/474,963 2017-03-22

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2018175807A1 true WO2018175807A1 (fr) 2018-09-27

Family

ID=61913643

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2018/023884 WO2018175807A1 (fr) 2017-03-22 2018-03-22 Réduction d'artefacts dans une imagerie par résonance magnétique par création d'inhomogénéité dans le champ magnétique à une position de gradient zéro d'un système irm

Country Status (2)

Country Link
US (1) US11353535B2 (fr)
WO (1) WO2018175807A1 (fr)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US11353535B2 (en) * 2017-03-22 2022-06-07 Viewray Technologies, Inc. Reduction of artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging
EP4010720A4 (fr) * 2019-08-05 2023-08-09 The Board Of Regents Of The University Of Texas System Système d'irm inhomogène

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2003135419A (ja) * 2001-10-26 2003-05-13 Ge Medical Systems Global Technology Co Llc 勾配磁界調整方法およびｍｒｉ装置
US20070262776A1 (en) * 2006-05-10 2007-11-15 Petropoulos Labros S Magnetic Resonance Imaging Magnet Assembly System with Improved Homogeneity
US20090039882A1 (en) * 2005-07-07 2009-02-12 King Kevin F Method and system of mr imaging with reduced fse cusp artifacts
US20150200046A1 (en) * 2014-01-13 2015-07-16 Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas System Apparatuses and Methods for Cancellation of Inhomogeneous Magnetic Fields Induced by Non-Biological Materials Within a Patient's Mouth During Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Family Cites Families (59)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH05300895A (ja) * 1991-07-31 1993-11-16 Hitachi Medical Corp Ｍｒｉ装置における核スピンの選択励起方法
US5413477A (en) * 1992-10-16 1995-05-09 Gas Research Institute Staged air, low NOX burner with internal recuperative flue gas recirculation
JPH067316A (ja) * 1992-06-29 1994-01-18 Hitachi Medical Corp 磁気共鳴イメージング装置の磁界発生装置
US5313163A (en) * 1992-08-12 1994-05-17 General Electric Company Sampling-ring saturation pulse for two-dimensional magnetic resonance selective excitation
US5600245A (en) * 1993-10-08 1997-02-04 Hitachi, Ltd. Inspection apparatus using magnetic resonance
US6411187B1 (en) * 1997-07-23 2002-06-25 Odin Medical Technologies, Ltd. Adjustable hybrid magnetic apparatus
US6157853A (en) * 1997-11-12 2000-12-05 Stereotaxis, Inc. Method and apparatus using shaped field of repositionable magnet to guide implant
US6212419B1 (en) * 1997-11-12 2001-04-03 Walter M. Blume Method and apparatus using shaped field of repositionable magnet to guide implant
US6163154A (en) * 1997-12-23 2000-12-19 Magnetic Diagnostics, Inc. Small scale NMR spectroscopic apparatus and method
US6218838B1 (en) * 1998-08-28 2001-04-17 Picker International, Inc. MRI magnet with high homogeneity, patient access, and low forces on the driver coils
US6323646B1 (en) * 1999-05-21 2001-11-27 General Electric Company Method and apparatus for producing diffusion weighted MR images
US6456077B2 (en) * 2000-02-29 2002-09-24 General Electric Company Method for generating ferromagnetic shim calibration file
US6680663B1 (en) * 2000-03-24 2004-01-20 Iowa State University Research Foundation, Inc. Permanent magnet structure for generation of magnetic fields
US6647134B1 (en) 2000-03-30 2003-11-11 Mayo Foundation For Medical Education And Research Autocorrection of MR projection images
US6795723B1 (en) * 2000-05-22 2004-09-21 Koninklijke Philips Electronics, N.V. Interleaved phase encoding acquisition for MRI with controllable artifact suppression and flexible imaging parameter selection
DE60231473D1 (de) * 2001-01-12 2009-04-23 Oxford Instr Superconductivity Verfahren und vorrichtung zur erzeugung eines magnetfeldes
US20030139886A1 (en) 2001-09-05 2003-07-24 Bodzin Leon J. Method and apparatus for normalization and deconvolution of assay data
US7190247B2 (en) * 2002-04-01 2007-03-13 Med-El Elektromedizinische Geraete Gmbh System and method for reducing effect of magnetic fields on a magnetic transducer
JP4381378B2 (ja) * 2002-12-27 2009-12-09 株式会社日立メディコ 磁気共鳴イメージング装置
US6977503B2 (en) * 2003-02-10 2005-12-20 Quantum Magnetics, Inc. System and method for single-sided magnetic resonance imaging
DE10333795B4 (de) * 2003-07-24 2008-01-31 Siemens Ag Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Vermeidung von peripheren Störsignalen in Spin-Echo-Bildern bei nicht monotonem Magnetfeldverlauf in der Magnetresonanz-Tomographie-Bildgebung
WO2005096929A1 (fr) * 2004-04-05 2005-10-20 Fukuyama, Hidenao Appareil d’imagerie par résonance magnétique et méthode d’imagerie par résonance magnétique
CN100415162C (zh) * 2005-03-09 2008-09-03 Ge医疗系统环球技术有限公司 磁体系统和磁共振成像系统
WO2008002506A2 (fr) * 2006-06-26 2008-01-03 Jianyu Lian Générateur de champ magnétique pour irm interventionnelle utilisant des aimants permanents
CN101495035B (zh) * 2006-07-31 2011-04-20 国立大学法人冈山大学 磁场发生器及具备该磁场发生器的核磁共振装置
WO2008061371A1 (fr) * 2006-11-24 2008-05-29 University Of New Brunswick Ensemble compact d'aimants permanents approprié pour produire un champ magnétique distant et procédé de fabrication
EP1944617A1 (fr) * 2007-01-11 2008-07-16 RWTH Aachen Procédé et appareil pour fournir un volume sensible pour RMN monoface
CN101388271A (zh) * 2007-09-14 2009-03-18 Ge医疗系统环球技术有限公司 磁体系统和mri设备
EP2317916B1 (fr) * 2008-06-23 2023-06-07 The Regents Of The University Of California, Berkeley Techniques améliorées pour l imagerie de particules magnétiques
EP2177925A1 (fr) * 2008-10-16 2010-04-21 RWTH Aachen Procédé de résonance magnétique utilisant un train d'impulsions avec modulation de phase et un angle d'inclinaison faible et constant
US9222998B2 (en) * 2008-12-18 2015-12-29 Grum Teklemariam Compact inhomogeneous permanent magnetic field generator for magnetic resonance imaging
DE102009003889B3 (de) 2009-01-02 2010-09-02 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Reduktion von Verzerrungen in der Diffusionsbildgebung
WO2010095062A1 (fr) 2009-02-17 2010-08-26 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Extension du champ de vision basée sur un modèle en imagerie nucléaire
US8847594B2 (en) * 2009-04-14 2014-09-30 The Board Of Trustees Of The University Of Illinois Method for reducing artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging
US9448294B2 (en) * 2009-06-30 2016-09-20 Aspect Imaging Ltd. Cage in an MRD with a fastening/attenuating system
US8536870B2 (en) * 2010-04-21 2013-09-17 William F. B. Punchard Shim insert for high-field MRI magnets
US8639006B2 (en) 2010-08-12 2014-01-28 Viewray Incorporated Correction of saturation banding artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging
EP2500742A1 (fr) * 2011-03-17 2012-09-19 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Restriction de la région d'imagerie pour l'IRM dans un champ magnétique inhomogène
CN103596496B (zh) * 2011-06-30 2016-08-24 株式会社日立制作所 磁共振成像装置以及倾斜磁场波形推定方法
US20140155732A1 (en) * 2011-07-28 2014-06-05 The Brigham And Women's Hospital, Inc Systems and methods for portable magnetic resonance measurements of lung properties
DE102011082266B4 (de) * 2011-09-07 2015-08-27 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Abbilden eines Teilbereichs am Rand des Gesichtsfeldes eines Untersuchungsobjekts in einer Magnetresonanzanlage
US9678184B2 (en) * 2012-01-11 2017-06-13 Hitachi, Ltd. Method for increment of RF-phase based on static magnetic field inhomogeneity in MRI apparatus
US10281538B2 (en) * 2012-09-05 2019-05-07 General Electric Company Warm bore cylinder assembly
US9335393B2 (en) * 2012-09-13 2016-05-10 Siemens Medical Solutions Usa, Inc. MR parallel imaging system reducing imaging time
JP6162131B2 (ja) * 2012-09-20 2017-07-12 株式会社日立製作所 磁気共鳴イメージング装置および磁気共鳴イメージング方法
US9429673B2 (en) * 2012-09-21 2016-08-30 Vista Clara Inc. Surface-based NMR measurement
US9575152B1 (en) * 2013-03-10 2017-02-21 Fonar Corporation Magnetic resonance imaging
DE102013206580B4 (de) * 2013-04-12 2014-11-20 Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg Abbilden eines Teilbereichs eines Untersuchungsobjekts in einer Magnetresonanzanlage
JP6419797B2 (ja) * 2013-06-21 2018-11-07 コーニンクレッカ フィリップス エヌ ヴェＫｏｎｉｎｋｌｉｊｋｅ Ｐｈｉｌｉｐｓ Ｎ．Ｖ． 磁気共鳴ハイブリッドスキャナ用シムシステム
WO2016021603A1 (fr) * 2014-08-05 2016-02-11 株式会社 日立メディコ Dispositif d'imagerie par résonance magnétique, et procédé d'imagerie par résonance magnétique
US9999380B1 (en) * 2014-09-22 2018-06-19 Verily Life Sciences Llc Segmented magnets
JP6697187B2 (ja) * 2015-03-31 2020-05-20 日本電子株式会社 固体ｎｍｒ装置及びマジック角調整方法
US10228336B2 (en) * 2015-09-01 2019-03-12 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Mobile NMR sensor for analyzing subsurface samples
EP3411697B1 (fr) * 2016-02-04 2021-11-24 Clear-Cut Medical Ltd. Système d'imagerie irm utilisant un réseau d'aimants
US10473943B1 (en) * 2016-11-09 2019-11-12 ColdQuanta, Inc. Forming beamformer having stacked monolithic beamsplitters
US20180220949A1 (en) * 2017-02-08 2018-08-09 Pablo Jose Prado Apparatus and method for in-vivo fat and iron content measurement
WO2018175807A1 (fr) * 2017-03-22 2018-09-27 Viewray Technologies, Inc. Réduction d'artefacts dans une imagerie par résonance magnétique par création d'inhomogénéité dans le champ magnétique à une position de gradient zéro d'un système irm
US11333728B2 (en) * 2017-04-13 2022-05-17 The University Of Queensland Pre-polarisation magnet arrangement
DE102019209079A1 (de) * 2019-06-24 2020-12-24 Siemens Healthcare Gmbh Verfahren zur Vermessung von Wirbelstromfeldern in einer Magnetresonanzeinrichtung, Magnetresonanzeinrichtung, Computerprogramm und elektronisch lesbarer Datenträger

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2003135419A (ja) * 2001-10-26 2003-05-13 Ge Medical Systems Global Technology Co Llc 勾配磁界調整方法およびｍｒｉ装置
US20090039882A1 (en) * 2005-07-07 2009-02-12 King Kevin F Method and system of mr imaging with reduced fse cusp artifacts
US20070262776A1 (en) * 2006-05-10 2007-11-15 Petropoulos Labros S Magnetic Resonance Imaging Magnet Assembly System with Improved Homogeneity
US20150200046A1 (en) * 2014-01-13 2015-07-16 Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas System Apparatuses and Methods for Cancellation of Inhomogeneous Magnetic Fields Induced by Non-Biological Materials Within a Patient's Mouth During Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US11353535B2 (en) * 2017-03-22 2022-06-07 Viewray Technologies, Inc. Reduction of artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging
EP4010720A4 (fr) * 2019-08-05 2023-08-09 The Board Of Regents Of The University Of Texas System Système d'irm inhomogène

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US11353535B2 (en) 2022-06-07
US20180275238A1 (en) 2018-09-27

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP3433624B1 (fr) Procédés et appareil de calage de champ magnétique
US10132897B2 (en) Correcting the magnetic field of a medical apparatus with a gantry
TWI743481B (zh) 用於磁共振成像系統的b磁鐵方法及設備
JP6522079B2 (ja) 回転配列永久磁石を用いた携帯型磁気共鳴イメージングシステム
JP7638358B2 (ja) 介入のための開口を備える片側磁気共鳴画像システムおよび当該システムを動作させるための手法
EP1551506B1 (fr) Chauffage local au moyen de particules magnetiques
US10185006B2 (en) RF coil elements with split DC loops for magnetic resonance imaging systems for integrated parallel reception, excitation, and shimming and related methods and devices
CA2728108C (fr) Arrangement magnetique et procede pour definir un champ magnetique pour un volume de production d'image
CN112424625B (zh) 电阻电磁体系统
US20080164878A1 (en) Minimum Energy Shim Coils For Magnetic Resonance
WO2008008447A2 (fr) Dispositif portable pour une imagerie par résonance magnétique en champ ultra faible (ulf-mri)
JP2013544613A (ja) 磁性粒子に影響を及ぼす及び／又は磁性粒子を検出するための装置及び方法
EP2030036A2 (fr) Bobines à gradient transversal asymétrique tridimensionnel
US11454686B2 (en) Gradient system for a magnetic resonance imaging system
US20220120837A1 (en) Real-time compensation of high-order concomitant magnetic fields
US11353535B2 (en) Reduction of artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging
JPH11267112A (ja) 磁気共鳴像形成システム用グラジエントコイルアセンブリ
US20100102805A1 (en) Method and arrangement for influencing and/or detecting magnetic particles in a region of action
US11422214B2 (en) Gradient coil system
JPH01181855A (ja) 磁気共鳴イメージング装置
JPH11276457A (ja) 磁気共鳴像形成システム用グラジエントコイルアセンブリ
CN111712719A (zh) 对发射线圈的有源b1+匀场
JP6850796B2 (ja) 磁気共鳴画像誘導治療のための高周波アンテナアセンブリ
CN107205688B (zh) 磁场调整用磁矩配置计算方法以及磁场调整装置
US12276714B2 (en) Gradient coil unit free of active screening

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 18716818

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 18716818

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

点击 这是indexloc提供的php浏览器服务，不要输入任何密码和下载