WO2010130712A1 - Autogenous setting of non-hydraulic lime mortars by means of microbial carbonate production - Google Patents
Autogenous setting of non-hydraulic lime mortars by means of microbial carbonate production Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2010130712A1 WO2010130712A1 PCT/EP2010/056413 EP2010056413W WO2010130712A1 WO 2010130712 A1 WO2010130712 A1 WO 2010130712A1 EP 2010056413 W EP2010056413 W EP 2010056413W WO 2010130712 A1 WO2010130712 A1 WO 2010130712A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- mortars
- mortar
- micro
- organisms
- lime
- Prior art date
Links
- 239000004570 mortar (masonry) Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 153
- 239000004573 non-hydraulic lime Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 50
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 title claims description 28
- 230000000813 microbial effect Effects 0.000 title description 17
- BVKZGUZCCUSVTD-UHFFFAOYSA-L Carbonate Chemical compound [O-]C([O-])=O BVKZGUZCCUSVTD-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 title description 12
- 244000005700 microbiome Species 0.000 claims abstract description 95
- 235000015097 nutrients Nutrition 0.000 claims abstract description 29
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 17
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 11
- 241000894006 Bacteria Species 0.000 claims description 48
- 239000004576 sand Substances 0.000 claims description 46
- XSQUKJJJFZCRTK-UHFFFAOYSA-N Urea Chemical compound NC(N)=O XSQUKJJJFZCRTK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 33
- 239000004202 carbamide Substances 0.000 claims description 32
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 28
- 235000019738 Limestone Nutrition 0.000 claims description 27
- 239000006028 limestone Substances 0.000 claims description 27
- WQZGKKKJIJFFOK-GASJEMHNSA-N Glucose Natural products OC[C@H]1OC(O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H]1O WQZGKKKJIJFFOK-GASJEMHNSA-N 0.000 claims description 21
- 239000008103 glucose Substances 0.000 claims description 21
- 239000000920 calcium hydroxide Substances 0.000 claims description 16
- 229910001861 calcium hydroxide Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 14
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 claims description 14
- 239000004927 clay Substances 0.000 claims description 12
- 150000007524 organic acids Chemical class 0.000 claims description 12
- 235000005985 organic acids Nutrition 0.000 claims description 11
- 240000004808 Saccharomyces cerevisiae Species 0.000 claims description 10
- 230000003604 ureolytic effect Effects 0.000 claims description 9
- 238000002156 mixing Methods 0.000 claims description 8
- 230000003100 immobilizing effect Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- WQZGKKKJIJFFOK-VFUOTHLCSA-N beta-D-glucose Chemical compound OC[C@H]1O[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H]1O WQZGKKKJIJFFOK-VFUOTHLCSA-N 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000011429 hydraulic mortar Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000011431 lime mortar Substances 0.000 abstract description 49
- VTYYLEPIZMXCLO-UHFFFAOYSA-L Calcium carbonate Chemical compound [Ca+2].[O-]C([O-])=O VTYYLEPIZMXCLO-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 abstract description 15
- 229910000019 calcium carbonate Inorganic materials 0.000 abstract description 7
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 abstract description 4
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 75
- VYPSYNLAJGMNEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Silicium dioxide Chemical compound O=[Si]=O VYPSYNLAJGMNEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 48
- CURLTUGMZLYLDI-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon dioxide Chemical compound O=C=O CURLTUGMZLYLDI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 34
- 239000011230 binding agent Substances 0.000 description 30
- 239000001569 carbon dioxide Substances 0.000 description 28
- 229910002092 carbon dioxide Inorganic materials 0.000 description 28
- VSGNNIFQASZAOI-UHFFFAOYSA-L calcium acetate Chemical compound [Ca+2].CC([O-])=O.CC([O-])=O VSGNNIFQASZAOI-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 22
- 239000001639 calcium acetate Substances 0.000 description 22
- 235000011092 calcium acetate Nutrition 0.000 description 22
- 229960005147 calcium acetate Drugs 0.000 description 22
- 235000008733 Citrus aurantifolia Nutrition 0.000 description 21
- 235000011941 Tilia x europaea Nutrition 0.000 description 21
- 239000004571 lime Substances 0.000 description 21
- 241000193386 Lysinibacillus sphaericus Species 0.000 description 18
- 239000001963 growth medium Substances 0.000 description 16
- 238000007254 oxidation reaction Methods 0.000 description 16
- QTBSBXVTEAMEQO-UHFFFAOYSA-M Acetate Chemical compound CC([O-])=O QTBSBXVTEAMEQO-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 15
- AXCZMVOFGPJBDE-UHFFFAOYSA-L calcium dihydroxide Chemical compound [OH-].[OH-].[Ca+2] AXCZMVOFGPJBDE-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 14
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 14
- 230000003647 oxidation Effects 0.000 description 14
- 241000193375 Bacillus alcalophilus Species 0.000 description 12
- 239000000654 additive Substances 0.000 description 12
- 238000005119 centrifugation Methods 0.000 description 12
- 238000006253 efflorescence Methods 0.000 description 12
- 206010037844 rash Diseases 0.000 description 12
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 10
- KJFMBFZCATUALV-UHFFFAOYSA-N phenolphthalein Chemical compound C1=CC(O)=CC=C1C1(C=2C=CC(O)=CC=2)C2=CC=CC=C2C(=O)O1 KJFMBFZCATUALV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 10
- 235000014680 Saccharomyces cerevisiae Nutrition 0.000 description 9
- 235000011116 calcium hydroxide Nutrition 0.000 description 9
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 9
- 239000011575 calcium Substances 0.000 description 8
- CDBYLPFSWZWCQE-UHFFFAOYSA-L Sodium Carbonate Chemical compound [Na+].[Na+].[O-]C([O-])=O CDBYLPFSWZWCQE-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 7
- UIIMBOGNXHQVGW-UHFFFAOYSA-M Sodium bicarbonate Chemical compound [Na+].OC([O-])=O UIIMBOGNXHQVGW-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 7
- 230000007062 hydrolysis Effects 0.000 description 7
- 238000006460 hydrolysis reaction Methods 0.000 description 7
- 210000005253 yeast cell Anatomy 0.000 description 7
- 241000358067 Alkalibacillus haloalkaliphilus Species 0.000 description 6
- ODINCKMPIJJUCX-UHFFFAOYSA-N Calcium oxide Chemical compound [Ca]=O ODINCKMPIJJUCX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 6
- QXDMQSPYEZFLGF-UHFFFAOYSA-L calcium oxalate Chemical compound [Ca+2].[O-]C(=O)C([O-])=O QXDMQSPYEZFLGF-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 6
- 210000004027 cell Anatomy 0.000 description 6
- 239000004568 cement Substances 0.000 description 6
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 6
- 239000004567 concrete Substances 0.000 description 6
- 238000009629 microbiological culture Methods 0.000 description 6
- 239000000243 solution Substances 0.000 description 6
- 241000235070 Saccharomyces Species 0.000 description 5
- 229940041514 candida albicans extract Drugs 0.000 description 5
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 5
- 239000011148 porous material Substances 0.000 description 5
- 239000012138 yeast extract Substances 0.000 description 5
- 241000193830 Bacillus <bacterium> Species 0.000 description 4
- PPBRXRYQALVLMV-UHFFFAOYSA-N Styrene Chemical compound C=CC1=CC=CC=C1 PPBRXRYQALVLMV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 230000001580 bacterial effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 239000011449 brick Substances 0.000 description 4
- MKJXYGKVIBWPFZ-UHFFFAOYSA-L calcium lactate Chemical compound [Ca+2].CC(O)C([O-])=O.CC(O)C([O-])=O MKJXYGKVIBWPFZ-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 4
- 239000001527 calcium lactate Substances 0.000 description 4
- 235000011086 calcium lactate Nutrition 0.000 description 4
- 229960002401 calcium lactate Drugs 0.000 description 4
- 239000000292 calcium oxide Substances 0.000 description 4
- GUPPESBEIQALOS-UHFFFAOYSA-L calcium tartrate Chemical compound [Ca+2].[O-]C(=O)C(O)C(O)C([O-])=O GUPPESBEIQALOS-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 4
- 235000011035 calcium tartrate Nutrition 0.000 description 4
- 239000001427 calcium tartrate Substances 0.000 description 4
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000011066 ex-situ storage Methods 0.000 description 4
- 239000008188 pellet Substances 0.000 description 4
- 230000008439 repair process Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 4
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 4
- 241000220451 Canavalia Species 0.000 description 3
- 235000010520 Canavalia ensiformis Nutrition 0.000 description 3
- 241000186547 Sporosarcina Species 0.000 description 3
- 108010046334 Urease Proteins 0.000 description 3
- BVCZEBOGSOYJJT-UHFFFAOYSA-N ammonium carbamate Chemical compound [NH4+].NC([O-])=O BVCZEBOGSOYJJT-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 235000012255 calcium oxide Nutrition 0.000 description 3
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 3
- KXDHJXZQYSOELW-UHFFFAOYSA-N carbonic acid monoamide Natural products NC(O)=O KXDHJXZQYSOELW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 239000000470 constituent Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000013078 crystal Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000001035 drying Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 235000012054 meals Nutrition 0.000 description 3
- 230000035699 permeability Effects 0.000 description 3
- 235000021251 pulses Nutrition 0.000 description 3
- 229910000030 sodium bicarbonate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 229910000029 sodium carbonate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 238000001179 sorption measurement Methods 0.000 description 3
- 235000000346 sugar Nutrition 0.000 description 3
- 229910021532 Calcite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 241001146702 Candidatus Entotheonella factor Species 0.000 description 2
- OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon Chemical compound [C] OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- LKDRXBCSQODPBY-VRPWFDPXSA-N D-fructopyranose Chemical compound OCC1(O)OC[C@@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H]1O LKDRXBCSQODPBY-VRPWFDPXSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 229920001353 Dextrin Polymers 0.000 description 2
- PEDCQBHIVMGVHV-UHFFFAOYSA-N Glycerine Chemical compound OCC(O)CO PEDCQBHIVMGVHV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 239000005062 Polybutadiene Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000000996 additive effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229940037003 alum Drugs 0.000 description 2
- -1 and NaCI) Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000002956 ash Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000005452 bending Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229910021538 borax Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 229910052799 carbon Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 238000005266 casting Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000015556 catabolic process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012512 characterization method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000009792 diffusion process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000004090 dissolution Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000037353 metabolic pathway Effects 0.000 description 2
- 235000013379 molasses Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 239000002504 physiological saline solution Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229920002857 polybutadiene Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 239000000843 powder Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000001556 precipitation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 229920006395 saturated elastomer Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 239000000377 silicon dioxide Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000004328 sodium tetraborate Substances 0.000 description 2
- 235000010339 sodium tetraborate Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 239000000454 talc Substances 0.000 description 2
- 235000012222 talc Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 229910052623 talc Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 239000008399 tap water Substances 0.000 description 2
- 235000020679 tap water Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- QORWJWZARLRLPR-UHFFFAOYSA-H tricalcium bis(phosphate) Chemical compound [Ca+2].[Ca+2].[Ca+2].[O-]P([O-])([O-])=O.[O-]P([O-])([O-])=O QORWJWZARLRLPR-UHFFFAOYSA-H 0.000 description 2
- 238000002604 ultrasonography Methods 0.000 description 2
- FHVDTGUDJYJELY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 6-{[2-carboxy-4,5-dihydroxy-6-(phosphanyloxy)oxan-3-yl]oxy}-4,5-dihydroxy-3-phosphanyloxane-2-carboxylic acid Chemical compound O1C(C(O)=O)C(P)C(O)C(O)C1OC1C(C(O)=O)OC(OP)C(O)C1O FHVDTGUDJYJELY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 241000324499 Alkalibacillus Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000224489 Amoeba Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000203069 Archaea Species 0.000 description 1
- 241001468256 Bacillus cohnii Species 0.000 description 1
- 229910014813 CaC2 Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- UXVMQQNJUSDDNG-UHFFFAOYSA-L Calcium chloride Chemical compound [Cl-].[Cl-].[Ca+2] UXVMQQNJUSDDNG-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 1
- 241000195628 Chlorophyta Species 0.000 description 1
- 239000004375 Dextrin Substances 0.000 description 1
- FEWJPZIEWOKRBE-JCYAYHJZSA-N Dextrotartaric acid Chemical compound OC(=O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)C(O)=O FEWJPZIEWOKRBE-JCYAYHJZSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 241000196324 Embryophyta Species 0.000 description 1
- LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ethanol Chemical compound CCO LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- JOYRKODLDBILNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ethyl urethane Chemical compound CCOC(N)=O JOYRKODLDBILNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- WSFSSNUMVMOOMR-UHFFFAOYSA-N Formaldehyde Chemical compound O=C WSFSSNUMVMOOMR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 235000002918 Fraxinus excelsior Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 241000233866 Fungi Species 0.000 description 1
- 239000001888 Peptone Substances 0.000 description 1
- 108010080698 Peptones Proteins 0.000 description 1
- KWYUFKZDYYNOTN-UHFFFAOYSA-M Potassium hydroxide Chemical compound [OH-].[K+] KWYUFKZDYYNOTN-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 1
- 241000193395 Sporosarcina pasteurii Species 0.000 description 1
- 229910000831 Steel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000000692 Student's t-test Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229930006000 Sucrose Natural products 0.000 description 1
- CZMRCDWAGMRECN-UGDNZRGBSA-N Sucrose Chemical compound O[C@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O[C@@]1(CO)O[C@@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O1 CZMRCDWAGMRECN-UGDNZRGBSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000010521 absorption reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001133 acceleration Effects 0.000 description 1
- XYWMWLADMNOAAA-UHFFFAOYSA-N acetic acid;buta-1,3-diene Chemical compound CC(O)=O.C=CC=C XYWMWLADMNOAAA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- NIXOWILDQLNWCW-UHFFFAOYSA-N acrylic acid group Chemical group C(C=C)(=O)O NIXOWILDQLNWCW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002411 adverse Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229940072056 alginate Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 235000010443 alginic acid Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 229920000615 alginic acid Polymers 0.000 description 1
- BZDRWQZUTRBGCP-UHFFFAOYSA-N alumanylformic acid Chemical compound OC([AlH2])=O BZDRWQZUTRBGCP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 150000001413 amino acids Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 238000000540 analysis of variance Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 1
- RQPZNWPYLFFXCP-UHFFFAOYSA-L barium dihydroxide Chemical compound [OH-].[OH-].[Ba+2] RQPZNWPYLFFXCP-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 1
- 235000013405 beer Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000007767 bonding agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000001354 calcination Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000001110 calcium chloride Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910001628 calcium chloride Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 159000000007 calcium salts Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 230000000711 cancerogenic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 150000004657 carbamic acid derivatives Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 231100000315 carcinogenic Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 239000001913 cellulose Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920002678 cellulose Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000011083 cement mortar Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910010293 ceramic material Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 235000013339 cereals Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000003610 charcoal Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000007795 chemical reaction product Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000003795 chemical substances by application Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000003818 cinder Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000000576 coating method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005056 compaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001143 conditioned effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000006731 degradation reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000645 desinfectant Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- FYGDTMLNYKFZSV-MRCIVHHJSA-N dextrin Chemical compound O[C@@H]1[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)OC1O[C@@H]1[C@@H](CO)OC(O[C@@H]2[C@H](O[C@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@H]2O)CO)[C@H](O)[C@H]1O FYGDTMLNYKFZSV-MRCIVHHJSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 235000019425 dextrin Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 238000002845 discoloration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000012153 distilled water Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000428 dust Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000013601 eggs Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000000839 emulsion Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000007071 enzymatic hydrolysis Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000006047 enzymatic hydrolysis reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011067 equilibration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000013312 flour Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000012530 fluid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000012634 fragment Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000008014 freezing Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007710 freezing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229960001031 glucose Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 235000001727 glucose Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 150000004676 glycans Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 235000011187 glycerol Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000010438 granite Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000010440 gypsum Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052602 gypsum Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 230000036541 health Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000004572 hydraulic lime Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000011065 in-situ storage Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910010272 inorganic material Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000011147 inorganic material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052500 inorganic mineral Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000012482 interaction analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011835 investigation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 150000002500 ions Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000009630 liquid culture Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007774 longterm Effects 0.000 description 1
- VTHJTEIRLNZDEV-UHFFFAOYSA-L magnesium dihydroxide Chemical compound [OH-].[OH-].[Mg+2] VTHJTEIRLNZDEV-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 1
- 239000000347 magnesium hydroxide Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910001862 magnesium hydroxide Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000002609 medium Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000004060 metabolic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910000000 metal hydroxide Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 150000004692 metal hydroxides Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 229910044991 metal oxide Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 150000004706 metal oxides Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 235000010755 mineral Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000011707 mineral Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000010447 natron Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000025 natural resin Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000006911 nucleation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010899 nucleation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003921 oil Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000011368 organic material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000008520 organization Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010422 painting Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000019319 peptone Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000011505 plaster Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000004848 polyfunctional curative Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920001282 polysaccharide Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000005017 polysaccharide Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229940072033 potash Drugs 0.000 description 1
- BWHMMNNQKKPAPP-UHFFFAOYSA-L potassium carbonate Substances [K+].[K+].[O-]C([O-])=O BWHMMNNQKKPAPP-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 1
- 235000015320 potassium carbonate Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 238000002360 preparation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000018102 proteins Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 108090000623 proteins and genes Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000004169 proteins and genes Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 230000005855 radiation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005067 remediation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 150000003839 salts Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 238000007790 scraping Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002002 slurry Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000002689 soil Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005507 spraying Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000006641 stabilisation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011105 stabilization Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000010959 steel Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000003860 storage Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000758 substrate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000005720 sucrose Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000006228 supernatant Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000004083 survival effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229940095064 tartrate Drugs 0.000 description 1
- AYEKOFBPNLCAJY-UHFFFAOYSA-O thiamine pyrophosphate Chemical compound CC1=C(CCOP(O)(=O)OP(O)(O)=O)SC=[N+]1CC1=CN=C(C)N=C1N AYEKOFBPNLCAJY-UHFFFAOYSA-O 0.000 description 1
- 150000003673 urethanes Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 229920002554 vinyl polymer Polymers 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C04—CEMENTS; CONCRETE; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES
- C04B—LIME, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF, e.g. MORTARS, CONCRETE OR LIKE BUILDING MATERIALS; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES; TREATMENT OF NATURAL STONE
- C04B28/00—Compositions of mortars, concrete or artificial stone, containing inorganic binders or the reaction product of an inorganic and an organic binder, e.g. polycarboxylate cements
- C04B28/02—Compositions of mortars, concrete or artificial stone, containing inorganic binders or the reaction product of an inorganic and an organic binder, e.g. polycarboxylate cements containing hydraulic cements other than calcium sulfates
- C04B28/10—Lime cements or magnesium oxide cements
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C04—CEMENTS; CONCRETE; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES
- C04B—LIME, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF, e.g. MORTARS, CONCRETE OR LIKE BUILDING MATERIALS; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES; TREATMENT OF NATURAL STONE
- C04B20/00—Use of materials as fillers for mortars, concrete or artificial stone according to more than one of groups C04B14/00 - C04B18/00 and characterised by shape or grain distribution; Treatment of materials according to more than one of the groups C04B14/00 - C04B18/00 specially adapted to enhance their filling properties in mortars, concrete or artificial stone; Expanding or defibrillating materials
- C04B20/10—Coating or impregnating
- C04B20/1018—Coating or impregnating with organic materials
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C04—CEMENTS; CONCRETE; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES
- C04B—LIME, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF, e.g. MORTARS, CONCRETE OR LIKE BUILDING MATERIALS; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES; TREATMENT OF NATURAL STONE
- C04B24/00—Use of organic materials as active ingredients for mortars, concrete or artificial stone, e.g. plasticisers
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C04—CEMENTS; CONCRETE; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES
- C04B—LIME, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF, e.g. MORTARS, CONCRETE OR LIKE BUILDING MATERIALS; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES; TREATMENT OF NATURAL STONE
- C04B2103/00—Function or property of ingredients for mortars, concrete or artificial stone
- C04B2103/10—Accelerators; Activators
Definitions
- the present invention relates to the usage of micro-organisms to accelerate carbonation and hardening, and to increase the performance, usability and compressive strength of non-hydraulic lime mortars.
- the invention further encompasses non-hydraulic lime mortars comprising micro-organisms and relates to a process to fabricate such lime mortars.
- EMO European Mortar Industry Organization
- Lime (Ca(OH) 2 ) is probably the most versatile structural binder available and can be modified to suit a range of diverse uses and exposures. Lime has been used for the stabilization of soils, as a decorative medium for buildings, as a bonding aid of masonry units and for the improvement of wall surfaces, i.e. internal (plasters) and external (renders) coatings (Holmes and Wingate, 2006).
- lime mortars can be divided into two characteristic types, i.e. hydraulic and non-hydraulic lime mortars, with 'hydraulic' referring to the ability to set under water.
- Non-hydraulic or air lime mortars following an initial hardening due to drying, set entirely through carbonation.
- Carbonation is the process whereby slaked lime, or portlandite (Ca(OH) 2 ) reacts with carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) to form calcium carbonate, or calcite (CaCO 3 ).
- the latter is significantly stronger and less soluble than the portlandite.
- the process consists out of five steps: (1 ) diffusion of gaseous CO 2 through the pores of the mortar; (2) dissolution of CO 2 in the pore water; (3) dissolution of Ca(OH) 2 in the pore water; (4) chemical equilibration of the dissolved CO 2 in the pore water and (5) precipitation of CaCO 3 .
- non-hydraulic lime mortars are fabricated using lime putty, i.e. a slurry of Ca(OH) 2 .
- Lime putty is manufactured by adding an excess of water to quicklime (CaO 2 ), which is the reaction product of the calcination of limestone (CaCO 3 ) at about 900 0 C.
- quicklime CaO 2
- non-hydraulic lime is also available as a dry powder, i.e. hydrated lime. The latter is manufactured by slaking quicklime with a precise amount of water so that all the water either combines in the reaction or is driven off in the process.
- lime mortars offer some additional advantages over the use of cement regarding the environmental impact. Due to the lower production temperatures compared to cement, less energy is required for the fabrication of lime, resulting in 20% less carbon dioxide production. Furthermore, carbon dioxide is absorbed during the setting of lime mortars. Another advantage of lime mortars is the fact that bricks that are bonded together with lime mortar can be easily recycled, while this is not the case for cement bonded bricks (NationalGreenSpecification, 2008). Providing lime mortars with an early strength avoids failure due to environmental conditions such as frost or strong solar radiation (Pavia and Caro, 2006). Freezing of water saturated mortars induces strong fracturing and separation from the substrate as a result of the frost related expansion of water.
- Too rapid drying of the mortar results in fracturing of the mortar through shrinkage.
- Setting aids such as pozzolans can be used to accelerate setting. The latter enables the mortar to acquire an early strength, resulting in a higher resistance to weathering.
- ethyl carbamate is known to be carcinogenic which represents a serious health issue.
- Medici and Rinaldi (2002) proposed the addition of additives such as polyaminophenolic compounds tailored to boost the absorption of CO 2 to accelerate the carbonation of hydrated lime.
- Fisher (1999) mentioned the ability of a mixture of additives to improve the carbonation of lime mortars in the short and long term.
- the mixture (known as Solubel, Hasitkowskimortel GmbH, Germany) comprises borax, dextrine, alumina acetate, natron, natural resin, potash, proteins, talc and sugar.
- Table 1 gives an overview of different additives used in the past for modifying the workability and setting speed of lime mortars (Holmes and Wingate, 2006).
- Bonding agents Acrylic Molasses Polyvinyl Styrene emulsions acetate butadiene rubber
- Bacillus sphaericus (BS) and Sporosarcina pasteu ⁇ i (SP) are a source of urease and were used in this experiment to stimulate the autogenous setting of lime mortars by means of the microbial hydrolysis of urea.
- BS Bacillus sphaericus
- SP Sporosarcina pasteu ⁇ i
- BS A.C. Autoclaved centrifuged BS
- the sand was immersed for 24 hours in a fully grown culture of microorganisms to allow the formation of a biofilm on the aggregates.
- the error bars in the graphs indicate standard errors.
- Saccharomyces cerevisae was used in this experiment to stimulate the autogenous setting of lime mortars by means of the oxidation of glucose.
- SC Med. culture medium
- SC H 2 O water
- SC A.C. Autoclaved centrifuged SC
- the present invention relates to the usage of micro-organisms to accelerate carbonation and hardening, and to increase the performance, usability and compressive strength of non-hydraulic lime mortars. It is thus an object of the present invention to provide the use of micro-organisms for accelerating carbonation resulting in an increase in the compressive strength of non-hydraulic lime mortars.
- the term 'non-hydraulic lime mortars' refers to air-setting mortars, i.e. mortars which rely on the reaction of the binder with CO 2 (from the air) for setting/hardening of the mortar.
- binders are (but not limited to) metal hydroxides (Ca(OH) 2 , Mg(OH) 2 , Ba(OH) 2 ...) and metal oxides (CaO, MgO,);
- the present invention relates to mortars which contain at least 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80% or 90%, or 100% of such a binder. More specifically, the invention relates to mortars which contain at least 20% 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, or 90%, or 100% of Ca(OH) 2 (lime) . Definitions for the terms 'binder' and 'setting' are given on page 2, lines 14-21 of EP 041 1583.
- the invention thus relates to the microbially induced autogenous setting of non-hydraulic lime mortars or air lime mortars. It is also an object of the present invention to provide a non-hydraulic lime mortar comprising micro-organisms capable of accelerating carbonation and increasing the compressive strength of non-hydraulic lime mortars.
- a non-hydraulic lime mortar comprising micro-organisms capable of accelerating carbonation and increasing the compressive strength of non-hydraulic lime mortars.
- lime is a disinfectant in which micro-organisms are unable to grow or to be active.
- micro-organisms can be used that are capable to induce autogenous setting of air lime via producing CO 2 and accelerating carbonation.
- Said acceleration in carbonation results in an increase in compressive strength of at least 1.2 times (i.e. factor 1.2) higher compared to a reference non-hydraulic-lime mortar and is measured at a specific time point after completion of the fabrication of said mortars.
- Measuring carbonation and compressive strength is well known in the art and can -for example- be measured via determining carbonation depth via spraying phenolphthalein (carbonation depth), via performing strength tests according the European standard EN 1012-1 1 (compressive strength) and by means of ultrasonic waves as proposed by Cazalla et al. (1999) (evolution of setting or hardening of lime due to drying and/or carbonation).
- Said specific time point after completion of the fabrication of said mortars can be any day after said completion, for example: 3, 7, 14, 21 , 28, 35, 42, 49, 56 days post completion of fabrication of said mortars. Twenty eight (28) days post completion of fabrication of said mortars is a preferred specific time point.
- Said compressive strength is at least 1.2 times (i.e. factor 1.2) higher compared to a reference non-hydraulic-lime mortar.
- the terms ' at least 1.2 times higher compared to a reference non-hydraulic-lime mortar' means that when the compressive strength of a non-hydraulic lime mortar fabricated in the absence of micro-organisms (i.e.
- the reference mortar is equal to 1 , 2 or 3..., that the compressive strength of the non-hydraulic lime mortar -which is fabricated in the same manner as the reference mortar but whereby micro-organisms are used according to the invention- is at least equal to 1.2, 2.4, 3.6...'At least 1.2 times higher' means 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.6, 1.7, 1.8, 1.9, 2, 2.1 , 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, 2.5, 2.6, 2.7, 2.8, 2.9, 3, 3.1 , 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5, 3.6, 3.7, 3.8, 3.9, 4, 4.1 , 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, 4.5, 4.6, 4.7, 4.8, 4.9, 5, 5.1 ,
- the invention relates to the use of microorganisms for accelerating carbonation of non-hydraulic lime mortars resulting in an increase in the compressive strength wherein said compressive strength is at least 1.2 - 5.0 times (i.e. is between 1.2 and at least 5 times) increased compared to a reference non-hydraulic lime mortar.
- micro-organism' refers to an organism that is microscopic and is usually too small to be seen by the naked eye.
- the term includes bacteria, archaea, fungi, yeast, protista or protozoa such as amoeba, microscopic plants such as green algae, plankton etc.
- the term 'micro-organism' preferably refers to micro-organisms which are capable to grow and/or to be active under alkaline and/or under anaerobic conditions.
- An example of an alkaline condition is a soda lake.
- the term 'micro-organism' more preferably relates to yeasts, alkaliphilic bacteria or ureolytic bacteria.
- micro-organisms are Bacillus sphae ⁇ cus, Sporosarcina pasteu ⁇ i, Bacillus alcalophilus, Alkalibacillus haloalkaliphilus, Bacillus cohnii and Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
- the choice of micro-organisms is mainly governed by their ability to resist alkaline conditions and/or their rate of CO 2 production.
- the micro-organisms of the present invention can be added to the mortar mixture as such (i.e. after the microbial culture solution is removed via centrifugation), as a liquid (i.e.
- any material capable of immobilizing or sorbing of microorganisms may be added to the mortar matrix (whether or not loaded with microorganisms).
- the micro-organisms may form biofilms on the aggregates.
- micro-organisms as stated above, wherein said micro-organisms are immobilized or sorbed on any material or carrier which is capable of immobilizing or sorbing said micro-organisms, wherein said material or carrier is preferably an aggregate, and wherein said aggregate is more preferably expanded clay.
- said micro-organisms can be firstly (i.e. before they are added to said mortar mixture) encapsulated by compounds such as polysaccharides which will (i.e. once the micro-organisms are within the mortar) be degraded in this alkaline environment.
- the micro-organisms of the present invention metabolize nutrients outside the mortar (i.e.
- the present invention relates to the use of micro-organisms as stated above, wherein said micro-organisms produce CO 2 within said non-hydraulic lime mortars.
- the present invention also envisages the usage of non-metabolizing or dead microorganisms, or a mixture of living and dead micro-organisms for accelerating carbonation of non-hydraulic lime mortars resulting in an increase in the compressive strength of said non-hydraulic lime mortars of at least 1.2 times compared to a reference non-hydraulic lime mortar, and wherein said compressive strength is measured at a specific time point after completion of the fabrication of said mortars.
- Dead micro-organisms or fragments thereof within said mortars form a frame or act as a nucleation site wherein carbonate crystals can be deposited which results in increased strength of said mortars.
- micro-organisms might also be used as sporulating micro-organisms or as spores.
- nutrients might be, together with the micro-organisms, added to the mortar mixtures.
- a nutrient also referred to as an 'additive'
- a nutrient can be any chemical that said micro-organism requires to live and grow or a substance used in said micro-organism's metabolism which must be taken in from its environment.
- a non-limiting list of said nutrients includes: urea, yeast extract, NaHCO 3 , Na 2 CO 3 , bacterial nutrient broth (i.e.
- a preferred set of nutrients are/is organic acids, glucose and/or urea.
- the latter nutrients correspond -with regard to the production of carbon dioxide- to three metabolic pathways: the hydrolysis of urea (eq.1 ), the oxidation of organic acids (eq. 2) and the oxidation of glucose under aerobic (eq. 3) and anaerobic conditions (eq. 4).
- a non-hydraulic lime mortar comprising micro-organisms capable of accelerating carbonation and increasing the compressive strength of non-hydraulic lime mortars and having a compressive strength of at least 1.2 times compared to a reference non-hydraulic lime mortar wherein said compressive strength is measured at a specific time point after completion of the fabrication of said mortars.
- It is a further object of the present invention to provide a non-hydraulic lime mortar comprising micro-organisms capable to grow and/or to be active under alkaline conditions such as yeasts, alkaliphilic bacteria or ureolytic bacteria, which are possibly adsorbed on a material capable of immobilizing or sorbing microorganisms such as the aggregate expanded clay and which are capable of accelerating carbonation and increasing the compressive strength of non-hydraulic lime mortars and having a compressive strength of at least 1.2 times, or between 1.2 and at least 5.0 times, compared to a reference non-hydraulic lime mortar wherein said compressive strength is measured at a specific time point after completion of the fabrication of said mortars.
- a material capable of immobilizing or sorbing microorganisms preferably aggregates such as limestone sand, sand or expanded clay, a binder such as Ca(OH) 2 , and micro-organisms according to the invention.
- Table 2 gives an overview of the different types of aggregates used.
- the limestone sand originates from a quarry in Frasnes (Belgium) and was supplied by Carmeuse (Belgium). The sand was delivered with nominal size 0/4 mm. For mortar mixtures prepared with limestone sand with nominal size 0/2 mm, this sand had to be passed through a 2 mm sieve first.
- the siliceous river sand was provided by Kesteleyn (Belgium) with nominal size 0/5 mm, of which only the fraction 0/2 mm was used for the experiments.
- the expanded clay was provided by Argex (Belgium). The expanded clay was chosen as a replacement material for sand, because of its high porosity and water retention. Because of its high porosity, this material presents an ideal carrier for microorganisms.
- the apparent dry density or bulk density of the different types of sand was determined according the Belgian Standard NBN B1 1-206(1981 ).
- the binder used in this study was Supercalco 90 (Carmeuse, Belgium), i.e. hydrated lime powder. -Micro-organisms
- Table 3 gives an overview of the micro-organisms. With exception of Saccharomyces cerevisae (Algist Bruggeman, Belgium), all microorganisms were obtained from the BCCM culture collection (BCCM, Belgium). Four types of alkaliphilic bacteria have been screened for the production of carbon dioxide resulting from the oxidation of organic acids. Among these bacteria, Bacillus alcalophilus and Alkalibacillus haloalkaliphilus were observed to have the highest degradation rate of acetate, and hence, were selected.
- Micro-organisms were added to the mortar mixtures in two different ways, i.e. in solution or adsorbed on the aggregates.
- the micro-organisms might form biofilms on the aggregates.
- porous aggregates i.e. expanded clay, were used.
- the amount of tap water required for the production of a workable mortar was replaced by an identical volume of the respective microbial cultures.
- the microbial cultures were either directly added to the mortar mixture or subjected to a centrifugation procedure prior to application. In this way it was possible to discriminate between the hardening due to carbonate production in situ, resulting from the microbial activity in the mortar, and the ex situ carbonate production, resulting from microbial activity in the culture medium before addition to the mortar.
- the liquid culture was transferred to 50 mL sterile centrifuge tubes (TPP, Switzerland).
- the tubes were subjected to centrifugation in a Sorvall RC5C Plus centrifuge (Sorvall, USA) for 10 minutes at 7000 rpm. The supernatant was removed and the pellet was resuspended in 50 ml. of physiological saline. Subsequently, the tubes were subjected to another 10 minutes of centrifugation after which the pellet was resuspended in 50 ml. of distilled water containing 2 g.L "1 yeast extract. The resulting solution was then added to the mortar mixture. Additionally, mortar mixtures were prepared with different concentrations of centrifuged bacteria, in order to investigate the effect of the number of cells, and hence, amount of bacterial activity on the hardening process.
- the nutrients consist of compounds that need to be degraded by micro-organisms first in order for carbonate production to occur.
- ammonium carbamate was added to the mortar mixture in a concentration of 5% (w/w) of the mortar as proposed by Baglioni et al. (1997). This corresponds to a ratio of 48% (mol C/mol Ca) of the binder. Additionally, similar to the other series, ammonium carbamate has also been added to the mortar at a concentration of 25% (mol C/mol Ca) of the binder. The latter corresponds with a ratio of 2.6 % (w/w) of the mortar.
- Table 5 Overview of the different reference mixtures, prepared with a B:A of 0.13 and a W:B of 2.
- the amount of water was determined with the workability of the mortar as criterion. For the mixtures without nutrients, a good workable paste was obtained with a W:B of 2. This corresponded with a flow of about 150 mm. For the mixtures with nutrients, a W:B of 2 was observed to give too fluid mixtures. Therefore, these mixtures were prepared with a W:B of 1.5.
- Table 5 gives an overview of the different references mixtures corresponding to different aggregates.
- the amount of tap water to be added to the mixture was decreased with the amount of water taken up by the aggregates.
- Urease producing microorganisms have been added to lime mortar mixtures to stimulate the autogenous setting of lime by means of the microbial hydrolysis of urea.
- the addition of the Bacillus sphaericus culture medium resulted in a large increase of the flow compared to the reference mixture (- Figure 4).
- the addition of the culture medium resulted both in an increase of the compressive strength and carbonation depth. Higher increases in compressive strength, however, were observed in case Bacillus sphaericus had been added to the mixture after centrifugation. The highest strength was observed for a concentration of Bacillus sphaericus of 10 6 cells. ml. "1 (i.e.
- the goal of this experiment was to obtain the autogenous setting of lime mortars by means of carbonate production resulting from the oxidation of organic acids.
- the addition of alkaliphilic bacteria and calcium acetate resulted in a higher flow compared to the reference mixture.
- Both the addition of alkaliphilic bacteria in their culture medium and the addition after centrifugation resulted in a significant increase of the strength as can be observed from - Figure 6.
- the highest increase in strength can be observed for the mortar prisms containing calcium acetate. For these prisms, a compressive strength of about 4.5 N. mm "2 was observed.
- Mortar prisms containing a combination of alkaliphilic bacteria and calcium acetate showed a higher carbonation depth compared to prisms containing either bacteria or calcium acetate alone, the effect being more pronounced with an increased concentration of centrifuged bacteria (- Figure 6). Furthermore, the carbonation depth observed for mixtures prepared with centrifuged bacteria and acetate was much higher compared to the carbonation depth observed for mixtures prepared with autoclaved centrifuged bacteria and acetate. This finding indicates the involvement of living and/or intact cells in the autogenous setting of lime mortars. The use of sand as a carrier of alkaliphilic bacteria resulted in an increased strength compared to the reference mixture (- Figure 7).
- the aim of this experiment was to obtain the autogenous setting of lime mortars by means of carbonate production resulting from the microbial oxidation of glucose.
- the addition of glucose to the mortar mixture resulted in an increased flow as can be observed in - Figure 9.
- the addition of yeast cells (SC) did not affect the workability of the mortar mixture.
- Both the addition of glucose and yeast cells resulted in an increase of the compressive strength.
- Mortar mixtures prepared with autoclaved centrifuged yeast cells showed a smaller compressive strength compared to mixtures prepared with centrifuged yeast cells. This finding indicates the involvement of living and/or intact cells in the autogenous setting of lime mortars.
- the use of sand as a carrier for yeast cells resulted in an increased strength compared to the reference mixture (- Figure 10).
- the combination of bacteria and nutrients/additives resulted generally in higher compressive strengths compared to prisms only containing microorganisms.
- the highest compressive strengths were observed for the combinations of alkaliphilic bacteria and acetate (1.6-4.8 N. mm “2 ), followed by the combinations of yeasts and glucose (1.4-1.8 N. mm “2 ).
- the combinations of ureolytic bacteria and urea resulted in prisms with a compressive strength in the range of 0.8-1.8 N. mm “2 .
- the addition of glucose or calcium acetate at a concentration of 25% (mol C/mol Ca) of the binder resulted in prisms with a compressive strength of about 2 and 4.6 and N. mm “2 , respectively. The latter being about 1.5 times the strength of prisms that have been subjected to accelerated carbonation in a CO 2 -chamber.
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Ceramic Engineering (AREA)
- Materials Engineering (AREA)
- Structural Engineering (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- Inorganic Chemistry (AREA)
- Curing Cements, Concrete, And Artificial Stone (AREA)
Abstract
The present invention relates to the usage of micro-organisms to accelerate carbonation and to increase the compressive strength of non-hydraulic lime mortars. The micro-organisms of the present invention metabolize nutrients within the mortars in order to produce CO2 which results in accelerated CaCO3 formation and hence increased strength of the mortar. The invention further encompasses non-hydraulic lime mortars comprising micro-organisms and relates to a process to fabricate such lime mortars.
Description
AUTOGENOUS SETTING OF NON-HYDRAULIC LIME MORTARS BY MEANS OF MICROBIAL CARBONATE PRODUCTION
Technical field of the invention The present invention relates to the usage of micro-organisms to accelerate carbonation and hardening, and to increase the performance, usability and compressive strength of non-hydraulic lime mortars. The invention further encompasses non-hydraulic lime mortars comprising micro-organisms and relates to a process to fabricate such lime mortars.
Background art
The European Mortar Industry Organization (EMO) defines mortars by considering its constituents, i.e. "a mixture of aggregates, generally with a grain size less than 4 mm, one or more binders and possibly additives and/or admixtures; mortars with inorganic binders contain, in addition, water" (EMO, 2009).
Lime (Ca(OH)2) is probably the most versatile structural binder available and can be modified to suit a range of diverse uses and exposures. Lime has been used for the stabilization of soils, as a decorative medium for buildings, as a bonding aid of masonry units and for the improvement of wall surfaces, i.e. internal (plasters) and external (renders) coatings (Holmes and Wingate, 2006).
Based upon their setting or hardening behaviour, lime mortars can be divided into two characteristic types, i.e. hydraulic and non-hydraulic lime mortars, with 'hydraulic' referring to the ability to set under water. Non-hydraulic or air lime mortars, following an initial hardening due to drying, set entirely through carbonation. Carbonation is the process whereby slaked lime, or portlandite (Ca(OH)2) reacts with carbon dioxide (CO2) to form calcium carbonate, or calcite (CaCO3). The latter is significantly stronger and less soluble than the portlandite. The process consists out of five steps: (1 ) diffusion of gaseous CO2 through the pores of the mortar; (2) dissolution of CO2 in the pore water; (3) dissolution of Ca(OH)2 in the pore water; (4) chemical equilibration of the dissolved CO2 in the pore water and (5) precipitation of CaCO3.
Traditionally, non-hydraulic lime mortars are fabricated using lime putty, i.e. a slurry of Ca(OH)2. Lime putty is manufactured by adding an excess of water to quicklime (CaO2), which is the reaction product of the calcination of limestone (CaCO3) at about 9000C. Nowadays, non-hydraulic lime is also available as a dry powder, i.e. hydrated lime. The
latter is manufactured by slaking quicklime with a precise amount of water so that all the water either combines in the reaction or is driven off in the process. Reports on extensive damage to ancient masonry resulting from the use of cement based mortars together with the current requirements of repair mortars to be compatible with the original components of the masonry have resulted in a revival of the use of lime. Currently, lime has become one of the principal materials used in the conservation and restoration of historic buildings (Pavia et al., 2005).
Besides the compatibility aspects, the use of lime mortars offers some additional advantages over the use of cement regarding the environmental impact. Due to the lower production temperatures compared to cement, less energy is required for the fabrication of lime, resulting in 20% less carbon dioxide production. Furthermore, carbon dioxide is absorbed during the setting of lime mortars. Another advantage of lime mortars is the fact that bricks that are bonded together with lime mortar can be easily recycled, while this is not the case for cement bonded bricks (NationalGreenSpecification, 2008). Providing lime mortars with an early strength avoids failure due to environmental conditions such as frost or strong solar radiation (Pavia and Caro, 2006). Freezing of water saturated mortars induces strong fracturing and separation from the substrate as a result of the frost related expansion of water. Too rapid drying of the mortar, on the other hand, results in fracturing of the mortar through shrinkage. Setting aids such as pozzolans can be used to accelerate setting. The latter enables the mortar to acquire an early strength, resulting in a higher resistance to weathering.
Alternative approaches for the accelerated hardening of lime mortars aimed at the accelerated carbonation of the lime binder. The carbonation reaction depends mainly on the humidity and CO2 concentration of the surrounding atmosphere. The chemical and physical characteristics of the mortars, on the other hand, also have an important effect on the carbonation process. Because carbonation proceeds from the outside inwards, the thickness and permeability of the mortar will significantly affect the rate of carbonation. The permeability of the mortar is affected by several parameters, which can be controlled to enhance carbonation. The mix proportions, more specifically, the water to binder ratio, are well known to influence the final porosity and permeability. In addition to the mix proportions, the choice of the constituents of the mortar also has an important influence on the rate of carbonation. The addition of aggregates is known to impart a certain degree of porosity to the mortar, and hence, to assist carbonation (Elert et al., 2002). Furthermore, it should be clear that the diffusion of CO2 through the mortar is controlled by its pore structure.
Others have tried to accelerate carbonation by the introduction of CO2 or CO2 generating compounds in the mortar mixture. Direct introduction of carbon dioxide to lime grouts by means of CO2 saturated water, however, proved to be unsuccessful (Baglioni et al., 1997). Ferroni and Baglioni (EP 0411583) proposed the setting of lime mortars by means of additives such as urethanes or carbamates that slowly produce CO2 under alkaline conditions, i.e. autogenous setting. However, ethyl carbamate is known to be carcinogenic which represents a serious health issue. More recently, Medici and Rinaldi (2002) proposed the addition of additives such as polyaminophenolic compounds tailored to boost the absorption of CO2 to accelerate the carbonation of hydrated lime. Fisher (1999) mentioned the ability of a mixture of additives to improve the carbonation of lime mortars in the short and long term. The mixture (known as Solubel, Hasit Trockenmortel GmbH, Germany) comprises borax, dextrine, alumina acetate, natron, natural resin, potash, proteins, talc and sugar.
Table 1 gives an overview of different additives used in the past for modifying the workability and setting speed of lime mortars (Holmes and Wingate, 2006).
Table 1 Overview of different additives used in the past for modification of the properties of lime mortars (after Holmes and Wingate, 2006).
Additive types Examples
Accelerators Alum Borax Bone ash Calcium chloride
Gypsum Pozzolans
Air entrainers Ash residue Beer Broken brick Chalk and and tile limestone particles
Charcoal
Bonding agents Acrylic Molasses Polyvinyl Styrene emulsions acetate butadiene rubber
Sugar White of eggs
Hardeners Alum Bone ash Crushed shells Dextrin
Forge ashes or Granite dust or Marble dust Molasses
furnace cinders chippings
Oils Pozzolans Pulverized Rye flour soapstone (talc)
Styrene Sugar Gaggery) butadiene rubber
Hence, it is clear from the above that several strategies to accelerate carbonation, which results in an earlier strength of non-hydraulic lime mortars have been used. However, there is clearly still a need for alternative, well- or better-performing and/or user-friendly strategies resulting in an earlier and high compressive strength of these lime mortars.
Brief description of Figures
-Figure 1 Grading curves of the hydrated lime binder (A) and different types of aggregates
(B) -Figure 2 Indication of the locations on the prism (4 cm height) where the measurements of the wave velocities of ultrasonic pulses (sensors: 2 cm diameter) have been performed. The upper surface of the scheme corresponds with the troweled surface. -Figure 3 Effect of the duration and type of curing regime on the compressive strength of lime mortars with limestone sand 0/2. -Figure 4 Influence of the concentration and type of ureolytic microorganisms on the 28 day compressive strength (CS), flow and carbonation depth (CD) of lime mortars with limestone sand 0/2 and a W:B ratio of 1.5. Bacillus sphaericus (BS) and Sporosarcina pasteuήi (SP) are a source of urease and were used in this experiment to stimulate the autogenous setting of lime mortars by means of the microbial hydrolysis of urea. In order to investigate the influence of ex situ formed carbonate ions on the autogenous setting, microorganisms have been added to the mixtures in their culture medium (Med.) or after centrifugation (C). Autoclaved centrifuged BS (BS A.C.) were included as microbial control series. In order to allow an easy comparison of the mortar characteristics between mixtures with varying composition, it was decided to use identical ranges on the respective axes. The error bars in the graphs indicate standard errors.
-Figure 5 Influence of the use of sand as microbial carrier on the 28 day compressive strength (CS), flow and carbonation depth (CD) of lime mortars produced with a W:B ratio of 1.5. Bacillus sphaericus (BS) and Sporosarcina pasteurii (SP) are a source of urease and were used in this experiment to stimulate the autogenous setting of lime mortars by
means of the microbial hydrolysis of urea. The sand was immersed for 24 hours in a fully grown culture of microorganisms to allow the formation of a biofilm on the aggregates. -Figure 6 Influence of the concentration and type of alkaliphilic microorganisms on the 28 day compressive strength (CS), flow and carbonation depth (CD) of lime mortars with limestone sand 0/2 and a W:B ratio of 1.5. Bacillus alcalophilus (BA) and Alkalibacillus haloalkaliphilus (AH) were used in this experiment to stimulate the autogenous setting of lime mortars by means of the oxidation of acetate. In order to investigate the influence of ex situ formed carbonate ions on the autogenous setting, microorganisms have been added to the mixtures in their culture medium (Med.) or after centrifugation (C). Autoclaved centrifuged BA (BA A.C.) were included as microbial control series (* not determined) In order to allow an easy comparison of the mortar characteristics between mixtures with varying composition, it was decided to use identical ranges on the respective axes. The error bars in the graphs indicate standard errors. -Figure 7 Influence of the use of sand as microbial carrier on the 28 day compressive strength (CS), flow and carbonation depth (CD) of lime mortars with limestone sand 0/2 and a W:B ratio of 1.5. Bacillus alcalophilus (BA) and Alkalibacillus haloalkaliphilus (AH) were used in this experiment to stimulate the autogenous setting of lime mortars by means of the oxidation of acetate. The sand was immersed for 24 hours in a fully grown culture of microorganisms to allow the formation of a biofilm on the aggregates. In order to allow an easy comparison of the mortar characteristics between mixtures with varying composition, it was decided to use identical ranges on the respective axes. The error bars in the graphs indicate standard errors.
-Figure 8 Influence of the type of organic acid on the 28 day compressive strength (CS), flow and carbonation depth (CD) of lime mortars with limestone sand 0/2 and a W:B ratio of 1.5. Bacillus alcalophilus (BA) was used in this experiment to stimulate the autogenous setting of lime mortars by means of the oxidation of organic acids. In order to allow an easy comparison of the mortar characteristics between mixtures with varying composition, it was decided to use identical ranges on the respective axes. The error bars in the graphs indicate standard errors. -Figure 9 Influence of glucose and yeast cells on the 28 day compressive strength (CS), flow and carbonation depth (CD) of lime mortars with limestone sand 0/2 and a W:B ratio of 1.5. Saccharomyces cerevisae (SC) was used in this experiment to stimulate the autogenous setting of lime mortars by means of the oxidation of glucose. In order to investigate the influence of ex situ formed carbonate ions on the autogenous setting, microorganisms have been added to the mixtures in their culture medium (SC Med.) or in water (SC H2O). Autoclaved centrifuged SC (SC A.C.) were included as microbial control
series. (* not determined). In order to allow an easy comparison of the mortar characteristics between mixtures with varying composition, it was decided to use identical ranges on the respective axes. The error bars in the graphs indicate standard errors. -Figure 10 Influence of the use of sand as microbial carrier on the 28 day compressive strength (CS), flow and carbonation depth (CD) of lime mortars with limestone sand 0/2 and a W:B ratio of 1.5. Saccharomyces cerevisae (SC) was used in this experiment to stimulate the autogenous setting of lime mortars by means of oxidation of glucose. The sand was immersed for 24 hours in an active culture of yeasts to allow the formation of a biofilm on the aggregates. The latter was expected to enhance the survival of the microorganisms in the mortar. In order to allow an easy comparison of the mortar characteristics between mixtures with varying composition, it was decided to use identical ranges on the respective axes. The error bars in the graphs indicate standard errors. -Figure 11 Overview of the results from the ultrasonic measurements performed on prisms containing 8.3% urea and/or Bacillus sphaericus in culture medium (A and B), Bacillus alcalophilus and/or 25% acetate (C and D) and Saccharomyces cerevisae and/or glucose (E and F). The graphs on the left (A, C and E) present the wave velocities measured at the middle of mortar prisms of different ages. Notice the increase of the wave velocities with time, indicative of the hardening of the mortar. The graphs on the right (B, D and F) present the ratios of the wave velocities measured at the end (Va) and middle (Vb) of the mortar prisms. Note that values of Va/Vb around one are indicative of a homogenous hardening of the mortar across the complete length of the prism. Bars with an asterix are significantly different from the reference bars at a given time, i.e. 14, 21 or 28 days: **p < 0.05 and* p<0.01 as determined from independent groups T-tests. In order to allow an easy comparison of the mortar characteristics between mixtures with varying composition, it was decided to use identical ranges on the respective axes. The error bars in the graphs indicate standard errors.
Description of the invention
The present invention relates to the usage of micro-organisms to accelerate carbonation and hardening, and to increase the performance, usability and compressive strength of non-hydraulic lime mortars. It is thus an object of the present invention to provide the use of micro-organisms for accelerating carbonation resulting in an increase in the compressive strength of non-hydraulic lime mortars. The term 'non-hydraulic lime mortars' refers to air-setting mortars, i.e. mortars which rely on the reaction of the binder with CO2 (from the air) for setting/hardening of the mortar. Examples of such binders are (but not limited to) metal hydroxides (Ca(OH)2, Mg(OH)2, Ba(OH)2...) and metal oxides (CaO,
MgO,...). In particular, the present invention relates to mortars which contain at least 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80% or 90%, or 100% of such a binder. More specifically, the invention relates to mortars which contain at least 20% 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, or 90%, or 100% of Ca(OH)2 (lime) . Definitions for the terms 'binder' and 'setting' are given on page 2, lines 14-21 of EP 041 1583.
The invention thus relates to the microbially induced autogenous setting of non-hydraulic lime mortars or air lime mortars. It is also an object of the present invention to provide a non-hydraulic lime mortar comprising micro-organisms capable of accelerating carbonation and increasing the compressive strength of non-hydraulic lime mortars. Although the addition of bacteria to cementitious materials has been investigated by several authors (Ramachandran et al., 2001 ; Ramakrishnan et al., 2001 ; Ghosh et al., 2005; Jonkers et al. 2007 and 2008), micro-organisms have never been used before in lime mortars such as non-hydraulic lime mortars. It is well-known that lime is a disinfectant in which micro-organisms are unable to grow or to be active. Hence, it is surprising that micro-organisms can be used that are capable to induce autogenous setting of air lime via producing CO2 and accelerating carbonation.
Said acceleration in carbonation results in an increase in compressive strength of at least 1.2 times (i.e. factor 1.2) higher compared to a reference non-hydraulic-lime mortar and is measured at a specific time point after completion of the fabrication of said mortars. Measuring carbonation and compressive strength is well known in the art and can -for example- be measured via determining carbonation depth via spraying phenolphthalein (carbonation depth), via performing strength tests according the European standard EN 1012-1 1 (compressive strength) and by means of ultrasonic waves as proposed by Cazalla et al. (1999) (evolution of setting or hardening of lime due to drying and/or carbonation). Said specific time point after completion of the fabrication of said mortars can be any day after said completion, for example: 3, 7, 14, 21 , 28, 35, 42, 49, 56 days post completion of fabrication of said mortars. Twenty eight (28) days post completion of fabrication of said mortars is a preferred specific time point. Said compressive strength is at least 1.2 times (i.e. factor 1.2) higher compared to a reference non-hydraulic-lime mortar. The terms ' at least 1.2 times higher compared to a reference non-hydraulic-lime mortar' means that when the compressive strength of a non-hydraulic lime mortar fabricated in the absence of micro-organisms (i.e. the reference mortar) is equal to 1 , 2 or 3..., that the compressive strength of the non-hydraulic lime mortar -which is fabricated in the same manner as the reference mortar but whereby micro-organisms are used according to the invention- is at least equal to 1.2, 2.4, 3.6...'At least 1.2 times higher' means 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.6, 1.7, 1.8, 1.9, 2, 2.1 , 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, 2.5, 2.6, 2.7, 2.8, 2.9, 3,
3.1 , 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5, 3.6, 3.7, 3.8, 3.9, 4, 4.1 , 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, 4.5, 4.6, 4.7, 4.8, 4.9, 5, 5.1 ,
5.2, 5.3, 5.4, 5.5 or higher times higher. Hence, the invention relates to the use of microorganisms for accelerating carbonation of non-hydraulic lime mortars resulting in an increase in the compressive strength wherein said compressive strength is at least 1.2 - 5.0 times (i.e. is between 1.2 and at least 5 times) increased compared to a reference non-hydraulic lime mortar.
The term 'micro-organism' refers to an organism that is microscopic and is usually too small to be seen by the naked eye. The term includes bacteria, archaea, fungi, yeast, protista or protozoa such as amoeba, microscopic plants such as green algae, plankton etc. The term 'micro-organism' preferably refers to micro-organisms which are capable to grow and/or to be active under alkaline and/or under anaerobic conditions. An example of an alkaline condition is a soda lake. The term 'micro-organism' more preferably relates to yeasts, alkaliphilic bacteria or ureolytic bacteria. Therefore, it is a preferred object of the present invention to provide the use of micro-organisms which are capable to grow and/or to be active under alkaline and/or under anaerobic conditions, and more preferably to provide the use of yeasts, alkaliphilic bacteria or ureolytic bacteria, for accelerating carbonation of non-hydraulic lime mortars resulting in an increase in the compressive strength of said non-hydraulic lime mortars of at least 1.2 times compared to a reference non-hydraulic lime mortar, and wherein said compressive strength is measured at a specific time point after completion of the fabrication of said mortars. Examples of the latter micro-organisms are Bacillus sphaeήcus, Sporosarcina pasteuήi, Bacillus alcalophilus, Alkalibacillus haloalkaliphilus, Bacillus cohnii and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The choice of micro-organisms is mainly governed by their ability to resist alkaline conditions and/or their rate of CO2 production. The micro-organisms of the present invention can be added to the mortar mixture as such (i.e. after the microbial culture solution is removed via centrifugation), as a liquid (i.e. as micro-organisms suspended in microbial culture solutions), or adsorbed on aggregates such as quarry limestone sand, river sand, expanded clay or any other aggregate. Expanded clay is a preferred aggregate and protects the micro-organisms against the adverse conditions of the lime mortar. In addition to aggregates, any material capable of immobilizing or sorbing of microorganisms (e.g. cellulose, silica sol-gel alginate, ceramic materials or any other organic or inorganic material) may be added to the mortar matrix (whether or not loaded with microorganisms). The micro-organisms may form biofilms on the aggregates. Hence, it is an object of the present invention to provide the usage of micro-organisms as stated above, wherein said micro-organisms are immobilized or sorbed on any material or carrier which is capable of immobilizing or sorbing said micro-organisms, wherein said material or
carrier is preferably an aggregate, and wherein said aggregate is more preferably expanded clay. Alternatively, said micro-organisms can be firstly (i.e. before they are added to said mortar mixture) encapsulated by compounds such as polysaccharides which will (i.e. once the micro-organisms are within the mortar) be degraded in this alkaline environment. The micro-organisms of the present invention metabolize nutrients outside the mortar (i.e. when residing in microbial culture and before said culture containing the micro-organisms are added to the mortar mixtures) and/or inside the mortar in order to produce CO2 which results in accelerated carbonation and increased strength of the mortar. In a preferred embodiment, the present invention relates to the use of micro-organisms as stated above, wherein said micro-organisms produce CO2 within said non-hydraulic lime mortars.
The present invention also envisages the usage of non-metabolizing or dead microorganisms, or a mixture of living and dead micro-organisms for accelerating carbonation of non-hydraulic lime mortars resulting in an increase in the compressive strength of said non-hydraulic lime mortars of at least 1.2 times compared to a reference non-hydraulic lime mortar, and wherein said compressive strength is measured at a specific time point after completion of the fabrication of said mortars. Dead micro-organisms or fragments thereof within said mortars form a frame or act as a nucleation site wherein carbonate crystals can be deposited which results in increased strength of said mortars. In addition, said micro-organisms might also be used as sporulating micro-organisms or as spores. For an increased production of carbon dioxide by the micro-organisms, nutrients might be, together with the micro-organisms, added to the mortar mixtures. A nutrient (also referred to as an 'additive') can be any chemical that said micro-organism requires to live and grow or a substance used in said micro-organism's metabolism which must be taken in from its environment. A non-limiting list of said nutrients includes: urea, yeast extract, NaHCO3, Na2CO3, bacterial nutrient broth (i.e. peptone, meat- and yeast extract, and NaCI), glucose, calciumacetate, calciumlactate, calciumoxalate, calciumtartrate, natriumnitrate (as an electron acceptor), amino acids, sucrose,... It is thus an object of the present invention to provide for the usage of micro-organisms as indicated above, wherein nutrients or additives are added to said micro-organisms. A preferred set of nutrients are/is organic acids, glucose and/or urea. The latter nutrients correspond -with regard to the production of carbon dioxide- to three metabolic pathways: the hydrolysis of urea (eq.1 ), the oxidation of organic acids (eq. 2) and the oxidation of glucose under aerobic (eq. 3) and anaerobic conditions (eq. 4). CO(N H2)2 + 2 H2O → 2 NH4 + + CO3 2" eq. 1
CH2O + O2 → CO2 + H2O eq. 2
C6H12O6 + 6O2 → 6 CO2 + 6 H2O eq. 3
C6H12O6 → 2 CO2 + 2 C2H5OH eq. 4
It is an object of the present invention to provide a non-hydraulic lime mortar comprising micro-organisms capable of accelerating carbonation and increasing the compressive strength of non-hydraulic lime mortars obtainable by using the micro-organisms as indicated above. Hence, it is an object of the present invention to provide a non-hydraulic lime mortar comprising micro-organisms capable of accelerating carbonation and increasing the compressive strength of non-hydraulic lime mortars and having a compressive strength of at least 1.2 times compared to a reference non-hydraulic lime mortar wherein said compressive strength is measured at a specific time point after completion of the fabrication of said mortars. It is a further object of the present invention to provide a non-hydraulic lime mortar comprising micro-organisms capable to grow and/or to be active under alkaline conditions such as yeasts, alkaliphilic bacteria or ureolytic bacteria, which are possibly adsorbed on a material capable of immobilizing or sorbing microorganisms such as the aggregate expanded clay and which are capable of accelerating carbonation and increasing the compressive strength of non-hydraulic lime mortars and having a compressive strength of at least 1.2 times, or between 1.2 and at least 5.0 times, compared to a reference non-hydraulic lime mortar wherein said compressive strength is measured at a specific time point after completion of the fabrication of said mortars. It is a further object of the present invention to provide the latter non-hydraulic lime mortars wherein nutrients such as organic acids, glucose and/or urea are added. It is a further object of the present invention to provide the latter non- hydraulic lime mortars wherein said micro-organisms produce CO2 within said non- hydraulic lime mortars.
It is further an object of the present invention to provide a process to fabricate the latter non-hydraulic mortars comprising mixing water with a material capable of immobilizing or sorbing microorganisms, preferably aggregates such as limestone sand, sand or expanded clay, a binder such as Ca(OH)2, and micro-organisms according to the invention. The following non-limitative examples are given in order to illustrate the present invention
Examples
Constituents and micro-organisms -Aggregates and binder
Table 2 gives an overview of the different types of aggregates used. The limestone sand originates from a quarry in Frasnes (Belgium) and was supplied by Carmeuse (Belgium). The sand was delivered with nominal size 0/4 mm. For mortar mixtures prepared with limestone sand with nominal size 0/2 mm, this sand had to be passed through a 2 mm sieve first. The siliceous river sand was provided by Kesteleyn (Belgium) with nominal size 0/5 mm, of which only the fraction 0/2 mm was used for the experiments. The expanded clay was provided by Argex (Belgium). The expanded clay was chosen as a replacement material for sand, because of its high porosity and water retention. Because of its high porosity, this material presents an ideal carrier for microorganisms. The apparent dry density or bulk density of the different types of sand was determined according the Belgian Standard NBN B1 1-206(1981 ).
Table 2 Characteristics of the aggregates
Type Code Shape Nominal size Apparent dry density
(mm/mm) (kg.m"3)
Quarry limestone sand LS 0/2 Angular 0/2 1639
LS 0/4 Angular 0/4 1510
River sand RS 0/2 Round 0/2 1561
Expanded clay (Argex) AA 0/2 Angular 0/2 570
AR 0/2 Round 0/2 880
AR 0/4 Round 0/4 692
The binder used in this study was Supercalco 90 (Carmeuse, Belgium), i.e. hydrated lime powder. -Micro-organisms
Table 3 gives an overview of the micro-organisms. With exception of Saccharomyces cerevisae (Algist Bruggeman, Belgium), all microorganisms were obtained from the BCCM culture collection (BCCM, Belgium). Four types of alkaliphilic bacteria have been screened
for the production of carbon dioxide resulting from the oxidation of organic acids. Among these bacteria, Bacillus alcalophilus and Alkalibacillus haloalkaliphilus were observed to have the highest degradation rate of acetate, and hence, were selected.
Table 3 Overview of the different microorganisms
Metabolic pathway Microorganism Acces. Growth media Growth
Nr.* (g-L-1) cond.
Hydrolysis of urea Bacillus LMG Urea: 20 T: 28°C sphaericus 22257 Yeast extract: 20
Sporosarcina LMG Urea: 20 T: 28°C pasteurii 7130 Yeast extract: 20
Oxidation of organic acids Bacillus LMG Nutrient broth: 13 T: 37°C alcalophilus 7120 NaHCO3: 4.2 pH: 9.7
Na2CO3: 5.3
Alkalibacillus LMG Nutrient broth: 13 T: 28°C haloalkaliphilus 17943 NaCI: 50 pH: 9.7
NaHCO3: 4.2
Na2CO3: 5.3
Oxidation of glucose Saccharomyces Glucose: 10 T: 28°C cerevisae
*Accession number of the BCCM culture collection (Gent, Belgium)
Micro-organisms were added to the mortar mixtures in two different ways, i.e. in solution or adsorbed on the aggregates. The micro-organisms might form biofilms on the aggregates. In order to allow a good adsorption, porous aggregates, i.e. expanded clay, were used.
In case the micro-organisms were added in solution, the amount of tap water required for the production of a workable mortar was replaced by an identical volume of the respective microbial cultures. The microbial cultures were either directly added to the mortar mixture or subjected to a centrifugation procedure prior to application. In this way it was possible to discriminate between the hardening due to carbonate production in situ, resulting from the microbial activity in the mortar, and the ex situ carbonate production, resulting from microbial activity in the culture medium before addition to the mortar. For the centrifugation procedure, the liquid culture was transferred to 50 mL sterile centrifuge tubes (TPP, Switzerland). The tubes were subjected to centrifugation in a Sorvall RC5C
Plus centrifuge (Sorvall, USA) for 10 minutes at 7000 rpm. The supernatant was removed and the pellet was resuspended in 50 ml. of physiological saline. Subsequently, the tubes were subjected to another 10 minutes of centrifugation after which the pellet was resuspended in 50 ml. of distilled water containing 2 g.L"1 yeast extract. The resulting solution was then added to the mortar mixture. Additionally, mortar mixtures were prepared with different concentrations of centrifuged bacteria, in order to investigate the effect of the number of cells, and hence, amount of bacterial activity on the hardening process. Finally, mortar mixtures were also prepared with autoclaved (i.e. killed) centrifuged bacteria. The centrifugation procedure was similar as described above. Instead of physiological saline, however, the bacterial pellets were washed with demineralized water. Furthermore, the pellet obtained after the second centrifugation step was also resuspended in 50 ml. of demineralized water. Next, the contents of several centrifugation tubes (800 ml. in total) were transferred to a 1 L-Schott bottle (Schott Duran, USA) and autoclaved for 20 minutes at 1200C.
For the adsorption of microorganisms on sand, both porous (argex) and non-porous (limestone) aggregates have been evaluated. The aggregates were immersed for 24 hours in half a litre of an overnight grown culture of microorganisms. After this period, the culture medium was poured away and the aggregates were wept dry by means of a paper towel. Subsequently, these aggregates were added to the mixture.
- Nutrients (= additives)
Table 4 gives an overview of the nutrients. The nutrients consist of compounds that need to be degraded by micro-organisms first in order for carbonate production to occur.
In order to observe a substantial effect of the nutrient on the carbonation of the lime mortar, it was proposed that at about one fourth of the binder should be converted to calcium carbonate due to the action of the nutrient. For the calculation of the dosage of the nutrients, the following assumptions have been made: (1 ) all carbon (C) atoms of the nutrient are converted to CO32" and (2) all CO32" ions react with Ca2+ from the binder to form CaCO3. Therefore, the dosage of nutrients was expressed as mol C/mol Ca.
Table 4 Characteristics of the spontaneously dissociating compounds and nutrients
Type of carbonate production Formula M.W. Dosagea Solubility
(g.mol"1) (g) at
200C
Microbial breakdown required Hydrolysis of urea* Urea (NH2)2CO 60.06 14.4b 1080
43.2
86.4C
Oxidation of organic acids
Calcium acetate CaC4H6O4 158.17 28.4 400
Calcium lactate CaCβH-ioOe 308.3 37.0 90 (25°C)
Calcium oxalate CaC2O4 146.12 52.5 0.0067
Calcium tartrate CaC4H4O6 188.15 33.8 0.37 (00C) Oxidation of glucose
Glucose CβHi2θ6 180.16 21.6 470
*a25, b8.3 and c50% (mol C/mol Ca) for a binder content of 213.1 g lime. TFor the enzymatic hydrolysis of urea, jack bean meal was added at a concentration of 20% (w/w) of urea.
The following paragraph illustrates the calculation for a dosage of calcium acetate of 25% on 213.1 g of lime. Given the molecular weight of lime, i.e. 74.09 g.mol"1, 213.1 g of binder corresponds with 2.876 moles of binder. In order to convert 25% of the binder, 0.719 moles of CO32" are required. As one mole of calcium acetate theoretically produces four moles of CO3 2" (Table 4), 0.180 moles of calcium acetate are required. Given the molecular weight of calcium acetate, i.e. 158.17 g.mol"1, this corresponds with a mass of 28.43 g.
In order to compare microbially induced autogenous setting of lime mortars with chemically induced autogenous setting, ammonium carbamate was added to the mortar mixture in a concentration of 5% (w/w) of the mortar as proposed by Baglioni et al. (1997). This corresponds to a ratio of 48% (mol C/mol Ca) of the binder. Additionally, similar to the other series, ammonium carbamate has also been added to the mortar at a concentration of 25% (mol C/mol Ca) of the binder. The latter corresponds with a ratio of 2.6 % (w/w) of the mortar.
-Mortar composition
All mortar mixtures were prepared according to a fixed binder to aggregate ratio (B:A) and a fixed water to binder ratio (W: B), both ratios on weight base. The ratios were derived from a reference mixture with quarry limestone sand 0/2. The B:A ratio was calculated as suggested by Hayen et al. (2001 ), i.e. the amount of binder was determined by means of the bulk density of the hydrated lime and the volumetric porosity of the limestone sand 0/2 skeleton (calculated from the measured bulk density and the absolute density as supplied by the manufacturer). This resulted in a B:A ratio of 0.13 (or 1 :6.69), corresponding to a ratio of 1 :1.54 by volume.
Table 5 Overview of the different reference mixtures, prepared with a B:A of 0.13 and a W:B of 2.
Name Aggregates Binder Water
(g) (g) (g)
Sand Argex*
Limestone sand 0/2 1639.0 213.1 426.2
80% Limestone sand 0/2 and 20% AR 131 1.4 175.9 193.4 386.8
0/2
80% Limestone sand 0/2 and 20% AA 131 1.4 1 14.4 185.4 370.8
0/2
Limestone sand 0/4 1510.0 196.3 392.6
80% Limestone sand 0/4 and 20% AR 1208.0 138.3 175.0 350.0
0/4
Silica sand 0/2 1560.6 202.9 405.8
* Replacement of sand by Argex calculated on volume base
The amount of water was determined with the workability of the mortar as criterion. For the mixtures without nutrients, a good workable paste was obtained with a W:B of 2. This corresponded with a flow of about 150 mm. For the mixtures with nutrients, a W:B of 2 was observed to give too fluid mixtures. Therefore, these mixtures were prepared with a W:B of 1.5.
Table 5 gives an overview of the different references mixtures corresponding to different aggregates. For the mixtures prepared with aggregates that have been immersed in microbial cultures, the amount of tap water to be added to the mixture was decreased with the amount of water taken up by the aggregates.
Process and characterization -Casting and curing
Fabrication of the mortars occurred in an air conditioned room at 200C. Mortar mixtures were mixed by means of a N50 Hobart mixer (Hobart, USA). For the preparation of the mortar, about 50% of the water was poured in the bowl, followed by half of the aggregates, the binder and nutrients, and then the other half of the aggregates. Mixing was done according to the procedure suggested by Hendrickx et al. (2008), i.e. one and a half minutes of mixing, half a minute of scraping and homogenizing and finally another two minutes of mixing. All mixing was done at low speed (136 rpm). During the first mixing period, the other half of the water was gradually added to the bowl. Subsequently, mortar mixtures were cast in steel moulds containing three compartments with the following dimensions: 40 x 40 x 160 mm3. The mixture was compacted by means of a jolting apparatus according to EN 196-1 :1994. After casting, the mortar prisms were stored at 200C and 65% R. H. until determination of the bending tensile and compressive strength. Mortar prisms were de-moulded after seven days. One series of the Limestone 0/2 sand was subjected to accelerated carbonation. After seven days of storage at 20°C and 65% R. H., the prisms were de-moulded and transferred to a CC>2-chamber (200C, 65% R. H. and 10% CO2). -Testing
Flow
Immediately after mixing, the consistency of the fresh mortar was evaluated by means of a flow table according to the European standard EN 495-2. The flow of the mixture (mm) was calculated as the mean of two diameters of the mortar, measured in two directions at right angles to one another. For each mixture, two measurements of the flow were performed.
Ultrasonic measurements
The hardening of lime mortars with time was measured by means of ultrasonic waves, as proposed by Cazalla et al. (1999). According to these authors, the carbonation process is characterized by an increase in the velocity of the longitudinal ultrasonic waves in positive correlation to the degree of compaction.
In this research, the velocity of propagation of ultrasonic pulses was measured and analyzed by means of the FreshCon apparatus and FreshCon2 software, both developed at the University of Stuttgart, Germany (Rheinhardt et al., 2001 ). For each series under
investigation, measurements were performed on three prisms. On each specimen, analyses have been performed at two locations, i.e. at one end (location A) and at the middle of the prisms (location B) (-Figure 2). The direction of the measurements corresponds with the direction to which the prisms were afterwards subjected to the load in the compressive strength tests. Strategies used for the autogenous setting of lime mortars were expected to result in a more homogeneous carbonation along the prism, and hence, similar wave velocities at these two locations. Reference prisms, on the other hand, were expected to show a faster carbonation - and hence, higher wave velocities - at the end of the prisms compared to the middle due to the ingress of CO2 from the side. Therefore, we proposed the ratio of the velocities of the ultrasonic waves at these two locations (VaA/b) as a parameter to give an indication of the possible occurrence of autogenous setting. To ensure a good contact between the sensors (2 cm diameter) of the Freshcon apparatus and the mortar prisms, the sensors were moistened with glycerine. Measurements have been performed at an age of the prisms of 14, 21 and 28 days. The reported values for the velocities measured at the end and the middle of the prism, i.e. Va and Vb represent the average of 15 measurements (three prisms and five successive measurements for each location).
Bending tensile and compressive strength
Strength tests were performed at an age of 28 or 56 days according to the European standard EN 1012-11. The compressive strength given in the figures represents the mean from six measurements.
Determination of carbonation depth
Freshly broken surfaces obtained from mortar specimens previously subjected to compressive strength testing were sprayed with phenolphthalein for the determination of the carbonation depth. Phenolphthalein changes from colourless to purple in case the pH increases from 8.3 to 10. Therefore, phenolphthalein solutions have been used to differentiate the carbonated zone (pH of about 7-8) from the non carbonated zone (pH of about 12.5). The carbonation depth was measured at nine locations of the broken surface. The side opposite to the troweled face was not included for the calculation of the average carbonation depth, as it showed in general a lower carbonation depth. The latter could be attributed to the lower contact with the surrounding air during curing, as specimens were in contact with the support by means of this side. As four broken surfaces were evaluated per series, the values represent the mean of 36 measurements.
Results
-Accelerated carbonation
An increase of the compressive strength was observed with an increased duration of curing in the climatized room at 200C and 65% R. H. (-Figure 3). The 28 day compressive strength of specimens that had been cured in the CC>2-chamber was about 3.3 times higher than that of specimens that had been cured in the climatized room. From phenolphthalein measurements, it could be observed that the complete matrix was carbonated for the limestone prisms that had been cured in the CO2-chamber.
- Microbial induced autogenous setting
All mixtures containing microorganisms were prepared with a W:B ratio of 1.5. Similarly, the reference series presented in the graphs represent a mixture made with a W:B of 1.5.
- Microbial hydrolysis of urea
Urease producing microorganisms have been added to lime mortar mixtures to stimulate the autogenous setting of lime by means of the microbial hydrolysis of urea. The addition of the Bacillus sphaericus culture medium (BS Med.) resulted in a large increase of the flow compared to the reference mixture (-Figure 4). Furthermore, the addition of the culture medium resulted both in an increase of the compressive strength and carbonation depth. Higher increases in compressive strength, however, were observed in case Bacillus sphaericus had been added to the mixture after centrifugation. The highest strength was observed for a concentration of Bacillus sphaericus of 106 cells. ml."1 (i.e. 1.6 times higher than the reference), with a decrease in strength at higher concentrations. No differences could be observed between the compressive strength of mortar prisms treated with different types of ureolytic microorganisms. The mixtures prepared with autoclaved centrifuged bacteria and urea (BS A.C. 108 + 8.3% Urea) showed a lower workability and compressive strength compared to the respective mixtures prepared with centrifuged bacteria and urea (BS C. 108 + 8.3% Urea). This finding indicates the involvement of living and/or intact cells in the autogenous setting of lime mortars. The adsorption of the microorganisms on sand prior to the fabrication of the mortar mixture resulted in prisms with a higher compressive strength compared to the reference prisms (-Figure 5). For mortar prisms containing bacteria adsorbed on sand, the addition of 25% urea resulted in
an unchanged or decreased (for prisms containing Bacillus sphaericus) compressive strength. The addition of urea at a concentration of 25% (mol C/mol Ca) on the binder resulted in efflorescence at the outer surface of the prisms. The highest amount of efflorescence was observed at the troweled face of prisms containing 25% urea and 1/5 jack bean meal. Prisms containing urea to which bacteria have been added showed significantly less efflorescence compared to the prisms that contained jack bean meal. The smallest amount of deposits was found on the prisms to which bacteria have been added in culture medium. No or only limited efflorescence was observed on the prisms to which 8.3% urea had been added. -Oxidation of organic acids
The goal of this experiment was to obtain the autogenous setting of lime mortars by means of carbonate production resulting from the oxidation of organic acids. The addition of alkaliphilic bacteria and calcium acetate resulted in a higher flow compared to the reference mixture. Both the addition of alkaliphilic bacteria in their culture medium and the addition after centrifugation resulted in a significant increase of the strength as can be observed from -Figure 6. The highest increase in strength, however, can be observed for the mortar prisms containing calcium acetate. For these prisms, a compressive strength of about 4.5 N. mm"2 was observed. This is about one and a half times the compressive strength of mortar specimens that have been cured in the CO2-chamber and 4.5 times that of the reference mixture cured under normal atmospheric Cθ2-conditions. No additional strength was observed for the combination of bacteria and calcium acetate compared to prisms with calcium acetate alone. On the contrary, for the combination of calcium acetate with bacteria in their culture medium, a decrease of the strength could be observed. The mixtures prepared with autoclaved centrifuged bacteria (AB A.C. 108 and AB A.C. 108 + 25% Acetate) showed a lower workability and compressive strength compared to the mixtures prepared with centrifuged bacteria (AB C. 108 and AB C. 108 + 25% Acetate, respectively). Mortar prisms containing a combination of alkaliphilic bacteria and calcium acetate showed a higher carbonation depth compared to prisms containing either bacteria or calcium acetate alone, the effect being more pronounced with an increased concentration of centrifuged bacteria (-Figure 6). Furthermore, the carbonation depth observed for mixtures prepared with centrifuged bacteria and acetate was much higher compared to the carbonation depth observed for mixtures prepared with autoclaved centrifuged bacteria and acetate. This finding indicates the involvement of living and/or intact cells in the autogenous setting of lime mortars. The use of sand as a carrier of alkaliphilic bacteria resulted in an increased strength compared to the reference mixture (-
Figure 7). An additional increase of strength could be observed, in case calcium acetate had also been added to the mixture. The increase of strength, however, was low compared to prisms that only contained calcium acetate (-Figure 6). Because of the fact that an intense efflorescence was observed on the prisms that contained calcium acetate, calcium salts from other organic acids were evaluated regarding their performance in relation to the autogenous setting of lime mortars. With exception of calcium oxalate, all salts resulted in an increased flow (-Figure 8). The use of calcium lactate and calcium oxalate resulted in an increased strength compared to the reference. The increase was, however, low compared to the use of calcium acetate. The use of calcium tartrate, on the other hand, resulted in a decrease of the strength. The combination of Bacillus alkalophilus with calcium oxalate or tartrate did not result in an increased strength compared to the mixtures with only microorganisms. The addition of calcium acetate at concentrations of 25% (mol C/mol Ca) of the binder resulted in the occurrence of crystalline deposits at the outer surface of the prisms. The highest amount of efflorescence was observed for the prisms containing centrifuged bacteria and/or acetate. Limited or no efflorescence was observed on the prisms containing acetate to which bacteria had been added in culture medium or adsorbed on limestone sand. Prisms containing acetate and bacteria adsorbed on expanded clay, on the other hand, showed significant more efflorescence compared to prisms containing bacteria adsorbed on limestone sand. The addition of calcium lactate resulted also in the occurrence of white crystalline deposits on the surface. These crystals, however, appeared to be more firmly attached to the surface compared to the calcium acetate crystals which could be easily removed by wiping. No efflorescence was observed on prisms containing calcium tartrate or calcium oxalate. -Oxidation of glucose
The aim of this experiment was to obtain the autogenous setting of lime mortars by means of carbonate production resulting from the microbial oxidation of glucose. The addition of glucose to the mortar mixture resulted in an increased flow as can be observed in -Figure 9. The addition of yeast cells (SC), on the other hand, did not affect the workability of the mortar mixture. Both the addition of glucose and yeast cells resulted in an increase of the compressive strength. Mortar mixtures prepared with autoclaved centrifuged yeast cells showed a smaller compressive strength compared to mixtures prepared with centrifuged yeast cells. This finding indicates the involvement of living and/or intact cells in the autogenous setting of lime mortars. The use of sand as a carrier for yeast cells resulted in an increased strength compared to the reference mixture (-Figure 10).
-Ultrasonic measurements
From -Figure 11 , it can be seen that the addition of microorganisms and/or nutrients resulted in significantly higher wave velocities of ultrasonic pulses compared to the velocities measured for the reference prisms. The highest wave velocities were observed for mortars to which calcium acetate has been added (-Figure 11 C). Most series showed an increased wave velocity with time. The highest increase was observed for the specimens containing Bacillus alcalophilus in their culture medium together with 25% acetate between 14 and 21 days of curing.
The prisms containing Bacillus sphaericus and 8.3% urea (-Figure 11 B), 25% acetate (- Figure 1 1 D) or 25% glucose (-Figure 1 1 F) showed significant lower values of VaA/b compared to the reference prisms. For these series, the VaA/b values were below one during the first 21 days. At an age of 28 days, however, values below 1 were only observed for the prisms containing Bacillus sphaericus (BS) or BS and 8.3% urea.
-Taken together, the addition of micro-organisms, either separately or in combination with nutrients, resulted in an increased workability and strength of non-hydraulic lime mortars: Regarding the addition of micro-organisms, the following observations have been made:
• The compressive strengths of mortar prisms to which bacteria in culture medium have been added were observed to be 1.2-1.8 times higher than those of the reference prisms (i.e. 1.0 N. mm"2). Prisms containing yeasts, alkaliphilic or ureolytic bacteria in culture medium showed a compressive strength of about 1.4,
1.8 and 1.2 N. mm"2, respectively. The increase in strength was clearly accompanied by an increase of the carbonation depth, indicating the accelerated conversion of portlandite to calcite.
• The addition of centrifuged bacteria resulted in compressive strengths of about 1.3-1.6 times that of the reference series. The highest compressive strength was observed for a concentration of 106 cells. ml_"1, i.e. 1.6 N. mm"2. Prisms containing centrifuged alkaliphilic bacteria or yeasts showed compressive strengths of about 1.5 and 1.3 N. mm"2.
• For yeast cells, alkaliphilic and ureolytic bacteria adsorbed on aggregates, compressive strengths of about 1.2, 1.5 and 1.4 N. mm"2, respectively, have been observed.
• It should be noted that an increase of the strength by a factor 1.3 after 28 days corresponds with a compressive strength of the reference mortar at an age of 56 days.
• The increase in strength observed for the prisms to which bacteria have been added is in the same range of the strength increase observed for the prisms to which 5% (w/w) ammonium carbamate has been added. This compound had been proposed by Baglioni et al. (1997) for the autogenous setting of lime mortars.
The combination of bacteria and nutrients/additives resulted generally in higher compressive strengths compared to prisms only containing microorganisms. The highest compressive strengths were observed for the combinations of alkaliphilic bacteria and acetate (1.6-4.8 N. mm"2), followed by the combinations of yeasts and glucose (1.4-1.8 N. mm"2). The combinations of ureolytic bacteria and urea, on the other hand, resulted in prisms with a compressive strength in the range of 0.8-1.8 N. mm"2. The addition of glucose or calcium acetate at a concentration of 25% (mol C/mol Ca) of the binder resulted in prisms with a compressive strength of about 2 and 4.6 and N. mm"2, respectively. The latter being about 1.5 times the strength of prisms that have been subjected to accelerated carbonation in a CO2-chamber.
The addition of urea and calcium acetate at concentrations of 25% (mol C/ mol Ca) of the binder resulted in the presence of efflorescence on the prisms. Urea concentrations of 8.3%, on the other hand, did not produce efflorescence. Prisms that showed the highest amount of efflorescence were observed to show the highest compressive strength. Glucose, on the other hand, did not produce any deposits on the surface, but resulted in a green discoloration of the surface.
Ultrasonic measurements indicated that the combinations of urea and centrifuged bacteria -where a high compressive strength was observed- show a homogeneous carbonation along the prisms at an age of 14, 21 and 28 days. The combinations of centrifuged bacteria and acetate showed a high carbonation depth.
References
-Baglioni, F., Dei, L., Pique, F.,Sarti, G. and Ferroni, E., 1997. New autogenous lime- based grouts used in the conservation of lime-based wall paintings. Studies in Conservation, 42(1 ), 43-54.
-Cazalla, O..Sebastian, E.,Cultrone, G.,Nechar, M. and Bagur, M. G., 1999. Three-way
ANOVA interaction analysis and ultrasonic testing to evaluate air lime mortars used in cultural heritage conservation projects. Cement and Concrete Research, 29(11 ), 1749-
1752. -Elert, K.,Rodriguez-Navarro, C.,Pardo, E. S..Hansen, E. and Cazalla, O., 2002. Lime
Mortars for the Conservation of Historic Buildings. Studies in Conservation, 47(1 ), 62-75.
-EMO. (2009). "Definition of a mortar." 2009.
-Fisher, K. (1999). Traditional craftmanship in modern mortars - does it work in practice?
International RILEM Workshop on Historic Mortars: Characterization and tests. Bartos, P., -Ghosh, P.,Mandal, S.,Chattopadhyay, B. D. and Pal, S., 2005. Use of microorganism to improve the strength of cement mortar. Cement and Concrete Research, 35(10), 1980-
1983.
-Hayen, R., Van Balen, K. and Van Gemert, D. (2001 ). The influence of production processes and mortar compositions on the properties of historical mortars. 9th Canadian masonry symposium. University of New Brunswick, Canada.
-Hendrickx, R.,Minet, K.,Van Balen, K.and Van Gemert, D., 2008. Workability of mortars with building lime: assessment by a panel of masons versus lab testing. 14th International
Brick and Block Conference, Sydney, Australia.
-Holmes, S., Wingate, M., 2006. Building with lime: A practical introduction. ITDG, Warwickshir, UK.
-Jonkers, H. M. , Schlangen, E. (2007). Crack repair by concrete-immobilized bacteria.
Noordwijk, The Netherlands.
-Jonkers, H. M.,Thijssen, A.,Copuroglu, O. and Schlangen, E. (2008). Application of bacteria as self-helaing agent for the development of sustainable concrete. BioGeoCivil Engineering Conference. Delft.
-Medici, F. , Rinaldi, G., 2002. Poly-amino-phenolic additives accelerating the carbonatiton of hydrated lime in mortar. Environmental Engineering Science, 19(4), 271-276.
-NationalGreenSpecification. (2008). "Lime mortar, render and plaster."
-Pavia, S. , Caro, S., 2006. Lime mortars for masonry repair: Analytical science and laboratory testing versus practical experience. International Seminar Theory and Practice in Conservation - a tribute to Cesare Brandi, Lisbon, Portugal.
-Pavia, S., Fitzgerald, B. and Treacy, E., 2005. An assessment of lime mortars for masonry repair. Colloqium on concrete research in Ireland, Dublin.
-Ramachandran, S. K.,Ramakrishnan, V. and Bang, S. S., 2001. Remediation of Concrete
Using Micro-organisms. ACI Materials journal, 98(3-9. -Ramakrishnan, S. K.,Panchalan, R. K. and Bang, S. S., 2001. Improvement of concrete durability by bacterial mineral precipitation. 1 1th International conference on Fracture,
Turin, Italy.
-Rheinhardt, H.-W.,Grosse, C, Herb, A.,Weiler, B.and Schmidt, G. (2001 ). Method for examining a solidifying and/or hardening material using ultrasound, receptacle and ultrasound sensor for carrying out the method. U.S. Patent and Trademark office.
09/857,536.
Claims
1. Use of micro-organisms for accelerating carbonation of non-hydraulic lime mortars resulting in an increase in the compressive strength of said non-hydraulic lime mortars of at least 1.2 times compared to a reference non-hydraulic lime mortar, and wherein said compressive strength is measured at a specific time point after completion of the fabrication of said mortars.
2. Use according to claim 1 wherein said compressive strength is at least 1.2 - 5.0 times increased compared to a reference non-hydraulic lime mortar.
3. Use according to claims 1 or 2, wherein said micro-organisms are capable to grow and/or to be active under alkaline conditions.
4. Use according to claims 1 , 2 or 3, wherein said micro-organisms are yeasts, alkaliphilic bacteria or ureolytic bacteria.
5. Use according to claims 1 to 4, wherein said micro-organisms are adsorbed on a material capable of immobilizing or sorbing said microorganisms.
6. Use according to claim 5, wherein said material is an aggregate.
7. Use according to claim 6 wherein said aggregate is expanded clay.
8. Use according to claims 1 to 7, wherein nutrients are added to said micro-organisms.
9. Use according to claim 8, wherein said nutrient(s) are/is organic acids, glucose and/or urea.
10. Use according to claim 1-9, wherein said micro-organisms produce CO2 within said non-hydraulic lime mortars.
1 1. A non-hydraulic lime mortar comprising micro-organisms capable of accelerating carbonation and increasing the compressive strength of non-hydraulic lime mortars according to claim 1-10.
12. A process to fabricate a non-hydraulic mortar according to claim 1 1 comprising mixing water with:
- a material capable of immobilizing or sorbing microorganisms such as limestone sand, sand or expanded clay, -Ca(OH)2, and -micro-organisms.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP10730732A EP2429970A1 (en) | 2009-05-13 | 2010-05-11 | Autogenous setting of non-hydraulic lime mortars by means of microbial carbonate production |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
GB0908268.6 | 2009-05-13 | ||
GBGB0908268.6A GB0908268D0 (en) | 2009-05-13 | 2009-05-13 | Autogenous setting of non-hydraulic lime mortars by means of microbial carbonate production |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2010130712A1 true WO2010130712A1 (en) | 2010-11-18 |
Family
ID=40833962
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2010/056413 WO2010130712A1 (en) | 2009-05-13 | 2010-05-11 | Autogenous setting of non-hydraulic lime mortars by means of microbial carbonate production |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP2429970A1 (en) |
GB (1) | GB0908268D0 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2010130712A1 (en) |
Cited By (20)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2011137106A1 (en) * | 2010-04-27 | 2011-11-03 | Ginger Krieg Dosier | Methods for making construction material using enzyme producing bacteria |
WO2013079732A1 (en) * | 2011-11-29 | 2013-06-06 | Geosilex Trenza Metal, S.L. | Air setting method for obtaining prefabricated parts with binding matrices, matrices and prefabricated parts thus obtained and use thereof |
WO2013120847A1 (en) | 2012-02-13 | 2013-08-22 | Universiteit Gent | High performance biodeposition for strengthening of materials |
US8951786B1 (en) | 2010-04-27 | 2015-02-10 | Biomason, Inc. | Compositions, tools and methods for the manufacture of construction materials using enzymes |
US9199880B2 (en) | 2010-04-27 | 2015-12-01 | Biomason, Inc. | Methods for making construction materials using enzyme producing bacteria |
ITUB20152396A1 (en) * | 2015-07-22 | 2017-01-22 | Equilibrium Srl | COMPOSITIONS INCLUDING SIMBIOTIC MICRO-ORGANISMS, A PROCESS FOR THEIR PRODUCTION AND THEIR USE IN THE BUILDING FIELD |
CN108085279A (en) * | 2017-12-29 | 2018-05-29 | 重庆大学 | In a kind of calcareous sand urease-producing bacterium efficiently separate and identification method |
WO2019054969A3 (en) * | 2017-09-13 | 2019-05-31 | Dokuz Eylul Universitesi Rektorlugu | A bacterial biocalci fication method and construction materials obtained by means of this method |
US10450695B2 (en) | 2017-04-25 | 2019-10-22 | Biomason, Inc. | Compositions and methods of biologically cemented structures for marine applications |
US10717674B2 (en) | 2010-04-27 | 2020-07-21 | Biomason, Inc. | Methods for the manufacture of colorfast masonry |
WO2020180914A1 (en) * | 2019-03-04 | 2020-09-10 | The Regents Of The University Of Colorado, A Body Corporate | Living structural material |
CN112500040A (en) * | 2020-12-03 | 2021-03-16 | 河海大学 | Method for quickly recycling soft soil by combining microorganisms and high polymer resin |
CN115279989A (en) * | 2020-03-09 | 2022-11-01 | 日本石油天然气·金属矿物资源机构 | Hydrocarbon recovery method and hydrocarbon recovery system |
US11518687B2 (en) | 2017-10-05 | 2022-12-06 | Biomason Inc. | Biocementation method and system |
WO2023136327A1 (en) * | 2022-01-14 | 2023-07-20 | デンカ株式会社 | Carbonation promoter |
US11795108B2 (en) | 2016-10-31 | 2023-10-24 | Biomason Inc. | Microorganism loaded aggregate and manufacturing methods |
WO2023218085A1 (en) * | 2022-05-13 | 2023-11-16 | Tilman Fritsch | Building material or binder, and method for the production thereof and use of a fiber as a component of a building material or binder |
WO2023218086A1 (en) * | 2022-05-13 | 2023-11-16 | Tilman Fritsch | Building material or binder, and method for the production thereof and use of a shale additive as a component of a building material or binder |
US12180118B2 (en) | 2020-11-16 | 2024-12-31 | Nanyang Technological University | Carbonation of reactive magnesia cement (RMC)-based systems |
US12195392B2 (en) | 2015-03-10 | 2025-01-14 | Biomason Inc. | Compositions and methods for dust control |
Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2006066326A1 (en) * | 2004-12-20 | 2006-06-29 | Murdoch University | Microbial biocementation |
EP1978100A1 (en) * | 2007-04-03 | 2008-10-08 | Stichting Geodelft | Microbiologically induced carbonate precipitation |
-
2009
- 2009-05-13 GB GBGB0908268.6A patent/GB0908268D0/en active Pending
-
2010
- 2010-05-11 EP EP10730732A patent/EP2429970A1/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2010-05-11 WO PCT/EP2010/056413 patent/WO2010130712A1/en active Application Filing
Patent Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2006066326A1 (en) * | 2004-12-20 | 2006-06-29 | Murdoch University | Microbial biocementation |
EP1978100A1 (en) * | 2007-04-03 | 2008-10-08 | Stichting Geodelft | Microbiologically induced carbonate precipitation |
Non-Patent Citations (18)
Title |
---|
"Definition of a mortar", EMO. (2009), 2009 |
"Lime mortar, render and plaster", NATIONALGREENSPECIFICATION, 2008 |
BAGLIONI, F.; DEI, L.; PIQUE, F.; SARTI, G.; FERRONI, E.: "New autogenous lime- based grouts used in the conservation of lime-based wall paintings", STUDIES IN CONSERVATION, vol. 42, no. 1, 1997, pages 43 - 54 |
CAZALLA, O.; SEBASTIAN, E.; CULTRONE, G.; NECHAR, M.; BAGUR, M. G.: "Three-way ANOVA interaction analysis and ultrasonic testing to evaluate air lime mortars used in cultural heritage conservation projects", CEMENT AND CONCRETE RESEARCH, vol. 29, no. 11, 1999, pages 1749 - 1752 |
ELERT, K.; RODRIGUEZ-NAVARRO, C.; PARDO, E. S.; HANSEN, E.; CAZALLA, O.: "Lime Mortars for the Conservation of Historic Buildings", STUDIES IN CONSERVATION, vol. 47, no. 1, 2002, pages 62 - 75 |
FISHER, K.: "Traditional craftmanship in modern mortars - does it work in practice?", INTERNATIONAL RILEM WORKSHOP ON HISTORIC MORTARS: CHARACTERIZATION AND TESTS. BARTOS, P., 1999 |
GHOSH, P.; MANDAL, S.; CHATTOPADHYAY, B. D.; PAL, S.: "Use of microorganism to improve the strength of cement mortar", CEMENT AND CONCRETE RESEARCH, vol. 35, no. 10, 2005, pages 1980 - 1983 |
HAYEN, R.; VAN BALEN, K.; VAN GEMERT, D.: "The influence of production processes and mortar compositions on the properties of historical mortars", 9TH CANADIAN MASONRY SYMPOSIUM, 2001 |
HENDRICKX, R.; MINET, K.; VAN BALEN, K.; VAN GEMERT, D.: "Workability of mortars with buildinq lime: assessment by a panel of masons versus lab testinq", 14TH INTERNATIONAL BRICK AND BLOCK CONFERENCE, 2008 |
HOLMES, S.; WINGATE, M.: "Buildinq with lime: A practical introduction", ITDG, 2006 |
JONKERS, H. M.; SCHLANGEN, E., CRACK REPAIR BY CONCRETE-IMMOBILIZED BACTERIA, 2007 |
JONKERS, H. M.; THIJSSEN, A.; COPUROGU, O.; SCHLANGEN, E.: "Application of bacteria as self-helaing agent for the development of sustainable concrete", BIOGEOCIVIL ENQINEERINQ CONFERENCE. DELFT, 2008 |
MEDICI, F.; RINALDI, G.: "Poly-amino-phenolic additives accelerating the carbonatiton of hydrated lime in mortar", ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, vol. 19, no. 4, 2002, pages 271 - 276 |
PAVIA, S.; CARO, S.: "Lime mortars for masonry repair: Analytical science and laboratory testinq versus practical experience", INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR THEORY AND PRACTICE IN CONSERVATION - A TRIBUTE TO CESARE BRANDI, 2006 |
PAVIA, S.; FITZGERALD, B.; TREACY, E.: "An assessment of lime mortars for masonry repair", COLLOQIUM ON CONCRETE RESEARCH IN IRELAND, 2005 |
RAMACHANDRAN, S. K.; RAMAKRISHNAN, V.; BANG, S. S.: "Remediation of Concrete Using Micro-organisms", ACI MATERIALS JOURNAL, vol. 98, 2001, pages 3 - 9 |
RAMAKRISHNAN, S. K.; PANCHALAN, R. K.; BANG, S. S.: "Improvement of concrete durability by bacterial mineral precipitation", 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FRACTURE, 2001 |
STOCKS-FISCHER S ET AL: "Microbiological precipitation of CaCO3", SOIL BIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY, PERGAMON, OXFORD, GB LNKD- DOI:10.1016/S0038-0717(99)00082-6, vol. 31, no. 11, 1 October 1999 (1999-10-01), pages 1563 - 1571, XP002372267, ISSN: 0038-0717 * |
Cited By (31)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US10717674B2 (en) | 2010-04-27 | 2020-07-21 | Biomason, Inc. | Methods for the manufacture of colorfast masonry |
US8728365B2 (en) | 2010-04-27 | 2014-05-20 | Biomason, Inc. | Methods for making construction material using enzyme producing bacteria |
US8951786B1 (en) | 2010-04-27 | 2015-02-10 | Biomason, Inc. | Compositions, tools and methods for the manufacture of construction materials using enzymes |
US9199880B2 (en) | 2010-04-27 | 2015-12-01 | Biomason, Inc. | Methods for making construction materials using enzyme producing bacteria |
US9428418B2 (en) | 2010-04-27 | 2016-08-30 | Biomason, Inc. | Production and manufacture with enzymes and bacteria |
US11472738B2 (en) | 2010-04-27 | 2022-10-18 | Biomason Inc. | Methods for the manufacture of colorfast masonry |
EP3896047A1 (en) * | 2010-04-27 | 2021-10-20 | BioMason, Inc. | Methods for making construction material using enzyme producing bacteria |
US9796626B2 (en) | 2010-04-27 | 2017-10-24 | Biomason, Inc. | Production of masonry with bacteria |
WO2011137106A1 (en) * | 2010-04-27 | 2011-11-03 | Ginger Krieg Dosier | Methods for making construction material using enzyme producing bacteria |
WO2013079732A1 (en) * | 2011-11-29 | 2013-06-06 | Geosilex Trenza Metal, S.L. | Air setting method for obtaining prefabricated parts with binding matrices, matrices and prefabricated parts thus obtained and use thereof |
WO2013120847A1 (en) | 2012-02-13 | 2013-08-22 | Universiteit Gent | High performance biodeposition for strengthening of materials |
US12195392B2 (en) | 2015-03-10 | 2025-01-14 | Biomason Inc. | Compositions and methods for dust control |
EP3121156A1 (en) | 2015-07-22 | 2017-01-25 | Equilibrium Srl | Compositions comprising symbiotic microorganisms, a process for their manufacturing and use thereof in the field of building |
ITUB20152396A1 (en) * | 2015-07-22 | 2017-01-22 | Equilibrium Srl | COMPOSITIONS INCLUDING SIMBIOTIC MICRO-ORGANISMS, A PROCESS FOR THEIR PRODUCTION AND THEIR USE IN THE BUILDING FIELD |
US11795108B2 (en) | 2016-10-31 | 2023-10-24 | Biomason Inc. | Microorganism loaded aggregate and manufacturing methods |
US10450695B2 (en) | 2017-04-25 | 2019-10-22 | Biomason, Inc. | Compositions and methods of biologically cemented structures for marine applications |
WO2019054969A3 (en) * | 2017-09-13 | 2019-05-31 | Dokuz Eylul Universitesi Rektorlugu | A bacterial biocalci fication method and construction materials obtained by means of this method |
US11518687B2 (en) | 2017-10-05 | 2022-12-06 | Biomason Inc. | Biocementation method and system |
US12187620B2 (en) | 2017-10-05 | 2025-01-07 | Biomason Inc. | Biocementation method and system |
CN108085279A (en) * | 2017-12-29 | 2018-05-29 | 重庆大学 | In a kind of calcareous sand urease-producing bacterium efficiently separate and identification method |
WO2020180914A1 (en) * | 2019-03-04 | 2020-09-10 | The Regents Of The University Of Colorado, A Body Corporate | Living structural material |
US20220144702A1 (en) * | 2019-03-04 | 2022-05-12 | The Regents Of The University Of Colorado, A Body Corporate | Living structural material |
CN115279989A (en) * | 2020-03-09 | 2022-11-01 | 日本石油天然气·金属矿物资源机构 | Hydrocarbon recovery method and hydrocarbon recovery system |
US12104475B2 (en) | 2020-03-09 | 2024-10-01 | Japan Oil, Gas And Metals National Corporation | Hydrocarbon recovery method and hydrocarbon recovery system |
US12180118B2 (en) | 2020-11-16 | 2024-12-31 | Nanyang Technological University | Carbonation of reactive magnesia cement (RMC)-based systems |
CN112500040A (en) * | 2020-12-03 | 2021-03-16 | 河海大学 | Method for quickly recycling soft soil by combining microorganisms and high polymer resin |
WO2023136327A1 (en) * | 2022-01-14 | 2023-07-20 | デンカ株式会社 | Carbonation promoter |
JP2023103807A (en) * | 2022-01-14 | 2023-07-27 | デンカ株式会社 | Oxidation accelerator |
JP7522142B2 (en) | 2022-01-14 | 2024-07-24 | デンカ株式会社 | Carbonation accelerator |
WO2023218085A1 (en) * | 2022-05-13 | 2023-11-16 | Tilman Fritsch | Building material or binder, and method for the production thereof and use of a fiber as a component of a building material or binder |
WO2023218086A1 (en) * | 2022-05-13 | 2023-11-16 | Tilman Fritsch | Building material or binder, and method for the production thereof and use of a shale additive as a component of a building material or binder |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP2429970A1 (en) | 2012-03-21 |
GB0908268D0 (en) | 2009-06-24 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP2429970A1 (en) | Autogenous setting of non-hydraulic lime mortars by means of microbial carbonate production | |
Chaurasia et al. | A novel approach of biomineralization for improving micro and macro-properties of concrete | |
Kalhori et al. | Application of carbonate precipitating bacteria for improving properties and repairing cracks of shotcrete | |
Achal et al. | Improved strength and durability of fly ash-amended concrete by microbial calcite precipitation | |
Walker et al. | Mechanical properties and durability of hemp-lime concretes | |
Lors et al. | Microbiologically induced calcium carbonate precipitation to repair microcracks remaining after autogenous healing of mortars | |
Nagar et al. | Coupled effect of B. Sphaericus bacteria and calcined clay mineral on OPC concrete | |
Porter et al. | Synergistic chemical and microbial cementation for stabilization of aggregates | |
Tanyildizi et al. | Comparison of bacteria-based self-healing methods in metakaolin geopolymer mortars | |
Parracha et al. | Efficacy of iron-based bioproducts as surface biotreatment for earth-based plastering mortars | |
CN109987912A (en) | Zeolite prepares iron tailings dry powder and mortar | |
JP2004505876A (en) | Method for producing concrete or mortar using vegetable aggregate | |
US20210163357A1 (en) | Composition comprising at least one microorganism and use thereof | |
Wani et al. | Self-healing concrete | |
Tripathi et al. | Bacterial based admixed or spray treatment to improve properties of concrete | |
Yan et al. | Application of expanded perlite immobilized microorganisms in cementitious materials | |
KR101188190B1 (en) | Solidification compound using industrial by-products and microorganism | |
Akhtar et al. | Experimental investigation on strength and durability characteristics of bacteria-based self-compacted concrete with mineral admixtures | |
Kadamba et al. | Mechanical, durability and microstructure properties of self-healing concrete utilizing agro-industrial waste: a critical review | |
Polat et al. | A research for bacterial self-healing in metakaolin based geopolymer mortars | |
Sravanthi et al. | STUDIES ON COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH MICROSTRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF SELF-COMPACTING MORTAR WITH BACTERIA. | |
LIME | Background art The European Mortar lndustry Organization (EMO) defines mortars by considering its constituents, ie “a mixture of aggregates, generally with a grain size less than 4 mm, one or more binders and possibly additives and/or admixtures; mortars with inorganic binders contain, in addition, water"(EMO, 2009). | |
Deliktaş et al. | Investigation of using cave bacteria in the production of self-healing mortars | |
Khokhar et al. | Effect of mineral additives on some of durability parameters of concrete | |
Li et al. | Healing of cracked concrete by Sporosarcina pasteurii mediated carbonate deposition |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application |
Ref document number: 10730732 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2010730732 Country of ref document: EP |