+

WO2003030057A2 - Systeme de classification de reglementation - Google Patents

Systeme de classification de reglementation Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2003030057A2
WO2003030057A2 PCT/US2001/030702 US0130702W WO03030057A2 WO 2003030057 A2 WO2003030057 A2 WO 2003030057A2 US 0130702 W US0130702 W US 0130702W WO 03030057 A2 WO03030057 A2 WO 03030057A2
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
classification
database
product
engine
classifications
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2001/030702
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Andreas Dittrich
Martin Trostel
Petra Kneip
Bernd Bertenbreiter
Craig Cooper
Ray Sato
Phil Wong
Edward Lungren
Hiddo Boelkes
Original Assignee
Hewlett-Packard Company
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Hewlett-Packard Company filed Critical Hewlett-Packard Company
Priority to PCT/US2001/030702 priority Critical patent/WO2003030057A2/fr
Priority to US10/490,199 priority patent/US20040260477A1/en
Publication of WO2003030057A2 publication Critical patent/WO2003030057A2/fr

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce
    • G06Q30/02Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising

Definitions

  • Classifying the product can be slow and manually intensive,. especially for a company that sells a large number and variety of products to many different countries. Not only does the classification involve importing exporting country laws, but it usually involves importing country laws as well.
  • regulatory classification of a product is performed by using a computer to search a database for at least one classification covering the product; outputting a classification if the classification is found in the database; and, if no classification is found, ascertaining at least one classification in a different manner and entering any ascertained classifications to the database.
  • Figure 1 is an illustration of a method of performing regulatory classification of a product.
  • L0 Figure 2 is an illustration of an exemplary record for a classification database.
  • Figure 3 is an illustration of an entry in a conversion table.
  • Figure 4 is an illustration of a method of performing an audit check.
  • Figure 5 is an illustration of a classification system.
  • a classification request is formulated (block 110). Included in the classification request is information about the product.
  • the 0 product information might include a product name, a product number or other identifier.
  • the classification request may also specify search criteria, such as region, subject matter group, and the reason for classification.
  • a classification request could request classification of a machine bolt for import into the United States with respect to a specific subject matter group.
  • U.S. subject matter groups include import 5 classification (e.g., Harmonized Tariff Classification), export classification (e.g., Export Commodity Control Number), toxic goods (e.g., Toxic Goods Control Act Classification), etc.
  • Regions could include geographic regions (e.g., European Union) and specific countries (e.g., Germany). Regions could also include standards bodies (e.g., standards for electrical security, FCC), which are not geographically bound.
  • a computer is used to search a database for at least one classification covering the product information (block 112).
  • Each record 210 in the database may include an identifier 210a, a classification 210b, a region 210c, and a subject matter group 210d (see Figure 2).
  • Classifications for different subject matter groups may be searched if a subject matter group is not specified in the classification request. Thus, different subject matter classifications can be found for a single product or component.
  • Classifications for different regions may be searched if a region is not specified in the classification request. Typically, classifications for the following two countries will be searched: the importing country, and the exporting country. Different countries usually have different classification groups. Thus, different country classifications can be found for a single product or component.
  • a classification is found (block 114) if there is an exact match between the identifier in the classification request and an identifier in a database record (and all other search criteria is satisfied).
  • a classification could be found if the identifier in the classification request is similar to the identifier in the database record, provided that products having similar identifiers are assured of being in the same class. Such an assurance may be provided, for example, by a strict product numbering policy.
  • the corresponding classification or classifications are outputted (block 116).
  • the classifications may be outputted by outputting a file with the classification, displaying (e.g., printing, showing on a video monitor) the classification, providing the classification back to a linked application, etc.
  • the identifier or other product information may be outputted with the classifications.
  • Outputting the classifications may include preparing import declarations, export declarations, toxic substance declarations, and other declarations according to the subject matters supported by the classification system. If the identifier is not matched, the classification may be ascertained in a different manner.
  • a classification may be derived from attributes of the product (block 118).
  • Exemplary attributes include, but are not limited to, size, length, weight, capacity, resistance, performance data, whether the product includes software, whether it is recorded on CD, tape, or disc, etc.
  • a decision engine for this attribute-driven classification may be built as a decision tree, where the answer to a question determines the next set of questions to be asked, or the classification if enough details have been gathered.
  • Exemplary questions for a screw are as follows.
  • an attempt may be made to convert the classification from one region to another. If a classification is found in one region but not another (e.g., the exporting country but not the importing country), the classification may be derived from the classification of the same product or component in a different region (block 124).
  • a lookup table may be used to convert the classification of one region to the classification of another region.
  • An entry 310 in the lookup table is shown in Figure 3. The entry 30 identifies the local classification 310a, a different region 310b, and a corresponding classification of that different region 310c Any converted classifications are entered in the database (block 122) and outputted (block 116).
  • the classification is placed on hold for review and approval by an expert (block 128).
  • the classification request is routed to the appropriate expert, depending upon area of expertise, geographic coverage, product and technical knowledge, and priority of request. Classifications found by manual review are stored in the database (block 122).
  • search request does not specify a subject matter group
  • all subject matter groups for a specified region will be searched.
  • a lookup table may be used to identify all of the subject matter groups for each region.
  • the method of Figure 1 is performed on each product indicated in a classification request. If components of the product are classified, a separate classification request may be provided for each component. In that case, the product information would describe a component, and the method of Figure 1 would be performed on each component.
  • the converted and attribute-driven classifications may be routed to a classification expert for approval, before they are finally saved and outputted. That way, the converted and attribute-driven classifications would be 'proposals' requiring expert approval (or modification).
  • the attribute-driven classification and the classification conversion are optional. If both of these functions are performed, the order in which they are performed may be different than the order shown in Figure 1. For instance, the classification conversion may be performed before the attribute-driven classification.
  • the database may be used in ways other than obtaining classifications. Audits, quality checks, and classification comparisons may be performed. Classification consistency may be measured, for example, by comparing the classifications from different countries, or different regulations. Business models may be systematically analyzed and evaluated for potential duty and tax savings.
  • the computer may be programmed to perform automated duty recovery.
  • the process for calculating the duty recovery could be linked with the classification . system, and from there retrieve historical classifications and/or duty rates and calculate the differences to be paid or requested.
  • Figure 4 illustrates a method of performing an audit check.
  • a group of the classification results is stored in a database (block 410), the group is randomly sampled (block 412), and a determination is made as to whether the sampled classification results were determined properly (block 414).
  • FIG. 5 shows a system including a computer 510 programmed to perform the regulatory classification.
  • the computer 510 provides an interface 512 for receiving classification requests from sources such as users 514 and linked applications 516.
  • the interface 512 allows classification experts to request, assign, review and approve classifications, as well as enter questions for the attribute-driven classification.
  • the interface 512 allows users supporting or executing different business processes (e.g., sales rep ' s, order administration, logistics personnel) to look up classifications and submit requests for classifications. It allows business partners such as customers and suppliers to look up classifications and request classifications.
  • the interface 512 allows classifications to be assigned to multiple products as a single user activity, as opposed to assign product-by-product.
  • the computer 510 also provides an engine 18.
  • the engine 518 performs the functions shown in Figure 1.
  • a database 520 stores classification records, and it may also maintain product and classification documentation.
  • the database 520 also may store the questions that are used for attribute-driven classification.
  • the information stored in the database 520 may be used to determine whether reasonable care has been applied when assigning classifications.
  • the database 520 may store, maintain and provide information on classification schedules and tariffs, and duty tax rates. This allows the computer 510 to systematically analyze and evaluate business models for potential duty and tax savings.
  • Classification requests for classifications that need manual support may be placed in a work buffer 522 and remain in the work buffer 522 until classification has been completed or cancelled.
  • the classification requests in the work buffer 522 may be grouped and sorted organized according to requesting organization and function; requesting individual; requesting date; assigned priority; product attributes such as descriptions and product categories, requested classification subject area; or requested region. Such an organization makes it easier for an individual to find an entry in the work buffer.
  • the database 520 and the work buffer 522 may be stored in the computer, as shown in Figure 5.
  • the database 520 and the work buffer 522 may be stored in a standalone device (e.g., a network attached storage device) or another machine (e.g., another computer).
  • the database 520 may be a central database. Use of a central database offers a single repository for product classification. The central database ensures that the same products receive the same classifications.
  • the present invention is not limited to a single computer for performing the regulatory classification. Instead, the regulatory classification may be run on a distributed logic/data system having several computers.
  • the regulatory classification may be performed by a dedicated system, or it may be integrated into another system, such as an order management system.
  • the order management system might need export control numbers to determine whether an export license is needed for a particular transaction.
  • the order management system might also make use of classifications for quotation, sales and marketing, order processing, procurement, importation, duty drawback, shipping, and hazardous materials documentation.

Landscapes

  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Accounting & Taxation (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Finance (AREA)
  • Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Information Retrieval, Db Structures And Fs Structures Therefor (AREA)
PCT/US2001/030702 2001-10-01 2001-10-01 Systeme de classification de reglementation WO2003030057A2 (fr)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/US2001/030702 WO2003030057A2 (fr) 2001-10-01 2001-10-01 Systeme de classification de reglementation
US10/490,199 US20040260477A1 (en) 2001-10-01 2001-10-01 Regulatory classification system

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/US2001/030702 WO2003030057A2 (fr) 2001-10-01 2001-10-01 Systeme de classification de reglementation

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2003030057A2 true WO2003030057A2 (fr) 2003-04-10

Family

ID=21742883

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2001/030702 WO2003030057A2 (fr) 2001-10-01 2001-10-01 Systeme de classification de reglementation

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (1) WO2003030057A2 (fr)

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6650346B1 (en) Method and apparatus for classifying equipment in asset management database
US20020077998A1 (en) Web based system and method for managing sales deals
US20090083311A1 (en) Business intelligence data repository and data management system and method
US20020178120A1 (en) Contract generation and administration system
US20070136722A1 (en) Workstation Deployment
US7505566B2 (en) Method, system and computer program product for facilitating the analysis of automatic line insulation testing data
US20070088742A1 (en) System and Method for Providing Technology Data Integration Services
CN109684322B (zh) 一种用于自动海事稽核的数据处理系统和方法
US20080114643A1 (en) Methods of Creating Electronic Customs Invoices
US20040024784A1 (en) Information system for manipulating data related to the ordering and performance of services and communication of results
CN111612341A (zh) 一种it设备调拨管控系统及其调拨方法
US20070226267A1 (en) Automated records inventory and retention schedule generation system
US20010023376A1 (en) Parts information management method and parts information management system
CN112200326A (zh) 一种it设备运维管理系统及其方法
Schniederjans et al. Designing a quality control system in a service organization: A goal programming case study
US7225106B2 (en) Data processing system and method for processing test orders
WO2001093104A2 (fr) Systeme et procede permettant d'extraire des donnees d'une base de donnees au moyen d'un systeme de gestion de donnees
WO2002057988A2 (fr) Procede, dispositif et systeme d'evaluation des competences d'une base de fournisseurs
US20040260477A1 (en) Regulatory classification system
Jäntti et al. Identifying knowledge management challenges in a service desk: A case study
US20040254863A1 (en) Asset maintaining, controlling and accessing program
CN1441375A (zh) 综合跟踪系统
WO2003030057A2 (fr) Systeme de classification de reglementation
CN112380562B (zh) 安全信息管理平台
US8418049B2 (en) Stakeholder matrix

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DM DZ EC EE ES FI GB GD GE GH HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MN MW MX MZ NO NZ PH PL PT RO SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT TZ UG US UZ VN YU ZA

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GQ GW MR NE SN TD TG

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 10490199

Country of ref document: US

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase
NENP Non-entry into the national phase in:

Ref country code: JP

点击 这是indexloc提供的php浏览器服务,不要输入任何密码和下载