+

WO2003065667A1 - Procede et appareil de mise en oeuvre de la phase de connexion sur un chemin de communication numerique au moyen du precodage de tomlinson-harashima - Google Patents

Procede et appareil de mise en oeuvre de la phase de connexion sur un chemin de communication numerique au moyen du precodage de tomlinson-harashima Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2003065667A1
WO2003065667A1 PCT/FI2003/000077 FI0300077W WO03065667A1 WO 2003065667 A1 WO2003065667 A1 WO 2003065667A1 FI 0300077 W FI0300077 W FI 0300077W WO 03065667 A1 WO03065667 A1 WO 03065667A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
filter
parameters
decision
feedback equalizer
communications channel
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/FI2003/000077
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Janne Väänänen
Original Assignee
Tellabs Oy
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Tellabs Oy filed Critical Tellabs Oy
Publication of WO2003065667A1 publication Critical patent/WO2003065667A1/fr

Links

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L25/00Baseband systems
    • H04L25/02Details ; arrangements for supplying electrical power along data transmission lines
    • H04L25/03Shaping networks in transmitter or receiver, e.g. adaptive shaping networks
    • H04L25/03006Arrangements for removing intersymbol interference
    • H04L25/03343Arrangements at the transmitter end
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L25/00Baseband systems
    • H04L25/02Details ; arrangements for supplying electrical power along data transmission lines
    • H04L25/03Shaping networks in transmitter or receiver, e.g. adaptive shaping networks
    • H04L25/03006Arrangements for removing intersymbol interference
    • H04L25/03012Arrangements for removing intersymbol interference operating in the time domain
    • H04L25/03019Arrangements for removing intersymbol interference operating in the time domain adaptive, i.e. capable of adjustment during data reception
    • H04L25/03057Arrangements for removing intersymbol interference operating in the time domain adaptive, i.e. capable of adjustment during data reception with a recursive structure
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L25/00Baseband systems
    • H04L25/02Details ; arrangements for supplying electrical power along data transmission lines
    • H04L25/03Shaping networks in transmitter or receiver, e.g. adaptive shaping networks
    • H04L25/03006Arrangements for removing intersymbol interference
    • H04L2025/0335Arrangements for removing intersymbol interference characterised by the type of transmission
    • H04L2025/03375Passband transmission
    • H04L2025/03414Multicarrier

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a method according to claim 1 for implementing the connecting phase on a digital communications path utilizing Tomlinson-Harashima precoding.
  • the invention also relates to an apparatus for implementing the connecting phase on a digital communications path utilizing Tomlinson-Harashima precoding.
  • the bit stream is converted in a transmitter (TX) 1 into a symbol stream (S) that further is converted into an analog signal capable of passing through a communications channel.
  • the communications channel maybe, e.g., a radio path, copper wireline or fiber-optic cable.
  • the receiver (RX) 3 performs the recovery of the sent bit stream in a fashion as error-free as possible.
  • the bit stream reconstruction performed in the receiver is complicated by signal distortion and noise summed with the signal on the communications channel. Due to these side-effects, a portion of the reconstructed bits are erroneous (e.g., on an average, 1 bit per 10 bits may be erroneous).
  • the signal distortion originating from the transmission path is conventionally compensated for by means of equalizers that are located in the receiver, the transmitter or partially in both of these.
  • the equalizers maybe of a fixed or adaptive type. Respec- tively, the effect of noise is compensated for by means of different coding techniques such as Reed-Solomon coding, convolution coding, trellis coding, turbo coding and others.
  • a generally used correction method of channel distortion is the use of a linear adap- tive equalizer 5 or a fixed or adaptive feedback equalizer 4, 6, wherein the filters are implemented with the help of digital signal processing (DSP).
  • DSP digital signal processing
  • the feedback equalizer is situated in the receiver, it is called a decision-feedback equalizer 6 (DFE), while an equalizer located in the transmitter is called a Tomlinson-Harashima precoder 4 (TML).
  • DFE decision-feedback equalizer
  • TML Tomlinson-Harashima precoder 4
  • a system may also have both a DFE and a TML.
  • the linear equalizer may be situated in the receiver, the transmitter or, alternatively, one portion of the equalizer may be situated in the transmitter while the other portion resides in the receiver.
  • a shortcoming of a decision-feedback equalizer is the feedback of errors (error propagation) that degrades the noise tolerance margin of the system.
  • error propagation When the channel distortion is heavy and the bit rate per Hz of bandwidth is large, the feedback of errors may become so significant as to block the entire functionality of the system.
  • Tomlinson-Harashima precoders circumvents the error propagation problem.
  • compensation of signal distortion whose transfer function is not known a priori at the design stage of the apparatus, needs the use of a protocol for establishing a connection. Moreover, the connection must be bidirectional.
  • a decision-feedback equalizer over a Tomlinson-Harashima precoder is a simpler connection establishment phase.
  • a connection may usually be established without the need for specific training phase sequences and/or protocols, such as blind training of equalizers.
  • Tomlinson-Harashima precoder is used for compensating such a signal distortion whose transfer function is unknown during the design stage of the communications apparatus, a connection establishment protocol is invariably mandatory.
  • a bidirectional communications channel must assumed.
  • a conventional connection establishment protocol comprises the following main phases: 1) The system is adapted to the channel distortion by using an adaptive linear equalizer and adaptive decision-feedback equalizer at both ends of the connection. Herein, a low number of bits per Hz of bandwidth is typical in order to prevent error feedback from preventing operation at sufficiently high efficiency. 2) As soon as the connection operates in both directions (at a low bit rate per Hz), the parameter values of the decision-feedback equalizer are sent over to the other end of the connection. 3) The parameters of the decision-feedback equalizer thus transmitted over the communications channel are next programmed into a Tomlinson-Harashima precoder adopted at both ends of the connection, whereby the use of the decision- feedback equalizer is terminated.
  • Phase 2 is mandatory inasmuch as the connection cannot be expected in a general case to have identical transfer functions in both directions and, hence, the parameters of a decision-feedback equalizer cannot be used in a Tomlinson-Harashima precoder situated at the same end of the connection.
  • the filters of a decision-feedback equalizer and a Tomlinson-Harashima precoder may have an architecture implementing either an FIR (finite impulse response) filter or an IIR (infinite impulse response) filter.
  • Filters of the IIR type are generally used when the channel includes a digital HR-type filter operating at the symbol transmis- sion rate such as, e.g., a bandstop filter employed in the transmitter of NDSL modem for limiting the modem output power at given frequency ranges in order to avoid interference with radio amateur activities from spurious emissions of the telecommunications connection.
  • the poles of the IfR filter of both the decision-feedback equalizer and the Tomlinson-Harashima precoder are set equal to those of the filter on the channel.
  • an ITR-type filter of a decision-feedback equalizer or an IIR-type filter of a Tomlinson-Harashima precoder is assumed to be a filter having fixed and known spectral poles and either some or all of the filter parameters defining the location of its spectral nulls are adaptive.
  • the benefit of this arrangement is that a smaller number of parameters are required in the decision- feedback equalizer or the Tomlinson-Harashima precoder as compared with a solution based on an FIR filter.
  • one end of the connection uses filters of the FIR type in its decision- feedback equalizer and Tomlinson-Harashima precoder while the other end uses filters of the IIR type
  • the parameters transmitted over the communications channel are not directly suitable for use in the Tomlinson-Harashima precoder.
  • the goal of the invention is achieved by virtue transmitting during the connecting phase not only the parameter values of the decision-feedback equalizer, but also information on the implementation architecture of the filter used in the decision- feedback equalizer and, in the case the filter of the Tomlinson-Harashima precoder is of a different type in regard to the filter of the decision-feedback equalizer, the parameters are converted so as to be applicable in the filter of the Tomlinson- Harashima precoder.
  • An alternative embodiment comprises the step of transmitting the parameters of the filter of the decision-feedback equalizer over the connection at all times corresponding to, e.g., an FIR filter architecture and, if the decision-feedback equalizer happens to include an IIR-type filter, the sent parameters are converted suitable for an FIR-type filter prior to their transmission and, respectively, if the Tomlinson- Harashima precoder happens to be of the HR type, the parameters are converted suitable for an IIR-type filter prior to switching-in the Tomlinson-Harashima precoder. More specifically, the method according to the invention is characterized by what is stated in the characterizing part of claim 1.
  • the transmitter according to the invention is characterized by what is stated in the characterizing part of claim 11.
  • the receiver according to the invention is characterized by what is stated in the characterizing part of claim 14.
  • the invention offers significant benefits inasmuch as it facilitates the cooperation of different equipment architectures comprising a decision-feedback equalizer and a Tomlinson-Harashima precoder.
  • FIG. 1 shows a block diagram of a digital communications channel equipped with a Tomlinson-Harashima precoder in one transmission direction; -
  • FIG. 2 shows a block diagram of a digital communications channel equipped with a decision-feedback equalizer in one transmission direction
  • FIG. 3 shows a block diagram of a conventional decision-feedback equalizer with an FIR-type filter (the filter transfer function shown in the z-plane);
  • FIG. 4 shows a block diagram of a conventional Tomlinson-Harashima precoder with an FIR-type filter (the filter transfer function shown in the z-plane);
  • FIG. 5 shows a block diagram of a conventional Tomlinson-Harashima precoder with an IIR-type filter operating in combination with an IIR-type filter of the communications channel (the filter transfer function shown in the z-plane);
  • FIG. 6 shows a block diagram of a conventional decision-feedback equalizer equiv- alent to the Tomlinson-Harashima precoder of FIG. 5 and having its filter implemented as an IIR-type filter (the filter transfer function shown in the z-plane);
  • FIG. 7 shows a block diagram of an embodiment of the generation method of parameters in a system according to the invention for an IIR-type filter from the parameters of an FIR-type filter with the help of a conventional algorithm;
  • FIG. 8 shows a block diagram of an embodiment of the generation and accuracy estimation method of parameters of an FIR-type filter in a system according to the invention based on the parameters of an IIR-type filter using a prior-art algorithm;
  • FIG. 9 shows a block diagram of an embodiment suitable for use in a system according to the invention for the accuracy testing method for the parameters of an IIR-type filter constructed on the basis of the parameter values of an FIR-type filter;
  • FIG. 10 shows a block diagram of an embodiment suitable for use in a system according to the invention for the accuracy testing method for the parameters of an FIR-type filter constructed on the basis of the parameter values of an IIR-type filter.
  • FFE Feedforward equalizer FIR Digital filter of a finite impulse response
  • A(z _1 ) aoz "1 + aiz "2 + a 2 z “3 +... a N-1 z "N Transfer function of an FIR filter in the z- plane, whereby z '1 is the intersymbol delay.
  • LNl, LN2 Pair of transmitter-receiver terminals The pair of equipment LNl, LN2 together with the commumcations channel forms a bidirectional communications connection.
  • the invention relates to a method and apparatus capable of accomplishing the connecting phase on a bidirectional communications connection (LNl - LN2) utilizing Tomlinson-Harashima precoding even in the case the transmitter-receiver set (LNl) at one end of the connection comprising a Tomlinson-Harashima precoder and a decision-feedback equalizer include FIR-type filters (FIGS. 3 and 4), while at the other end (LN2) of the connection the corresponding filters are of the HR type (FIG. 5 and 6).
  • the invention is limited to IIR-type filters with fixed spectral poles (nonadaptive) and information on the architecture of the filters is either known a priori at both ends of the connection or, when necessary, can be relayed between the terminal equipment.
  • terminal equipment LNl and LN2 use adaptive decision-feedback equalizers.
  • the FIR-type filter of the decision-feedback equalizer of the receiver of equipment LNl changes its parameters (a 0 , a ls a 2 ,..., au-i) to values ao,u a lsl , a 2 , l .., a ⁇ - 1 , 1 (A_) and, respectively, the IIR-type filter of the decision-feedback equalizer of the receiver of equipment LN2 changes its spectral-zero-defining the parameters (p 0 , pi, p2,- • • » P L - I ) to values p 0 , 2 , p ⁇ , 2 , p 2 , 2 ,..., p L- ⁇ ,2 (P2).
  • the pole-defining parameters of the IIR-type filter are q 0 p, qiF, q2F,- • ., qMF (QF), which set of parameters is assumed to be known a priori in both sets of terminal equipment LNl and LN2.
  • continuation of the connection phase requires that parameter set Ai is converted to represent an IIR-type filter architecture in terminal equipment LNl, whereupon the set is transmitted over the communications channel to terminal equipment LN2 or alternatively, parameter set Ai is sent over the communications channel to terminal equipment LN2 and thereupon is converted to represent an IIR-type filter architecture in terminal equipment LN2.
  • parameter value set P 2 is converted to represent an FIR-type filter architecture in terminal equipment LN2 and thereupon is sent over the communications channel to terminal equipment LNl or alternatively, the parameter value set P 2 is sent over the communications channel to terminal equipment LNl and thereupon is converted to represent an HR-type filter architecture in terminal equipment LNl .
  • the conversion of a parameter value set A ⁇ to represent an HR-type filter can be performed using a method based on a z-plane equation
  • the FIR-type filter function A ⁇ (z _1 ) is also partially descriptive of transfer function l/Q F (z "1 ), parameters po 5 ⁇ > p ⁇ s ⁇ , p2, ⁇ > • • • should be small starting from a given index value I (power 1+1 of z "1 ), where I is smaller than number N of parameters in filter function A ⁇ z "1 ). If this is not the case, the FIR-type filter A ⁇ z "1 ) is not sufficiently long to represent the transfer function 1/Q F (Z _1 ).
  • the number (1+1) of parameters p 0 , l5 p l5l , p 2 , ⁇ , ... can be determined using the testing arrangement of FIG. 9, where I is selected such that the power level of error signal (e) becomes sufficiently low, e.g., reduced by 45 to 50 dB, as compared with the power level of the test signal (t).
  • the test signal (t) must be similar to the input signal of the Tomlinson-Harashima precoder filter.
  • Equation 7 An alternative method of using Eq. 2 is illustrated in FIG. 7.
  • Parameters p 0 , ⁇ , p ⁇ , ⁇ , p 2 , ⁇ , ..., p ⁇ , ⁇ are determined with the help of an adaptive control algorithm (e.g., Least Means Square, LMS).
  • LMS Least Means Square
  • the number (1+1) of parameters is preferably made using the system of FIG. 9, because the error signal (e) computed in the system of FIG. 7 is not compatible with the difference between filter functions A ⁇ (z _1 ) and P ⁇ (z " 1 )/QF(Z "1 ) in the situation corresponding to a Tomlmson-Harashima precoder.
  • Conversion of parameter set P 2 to represent an FIR-type filter can be performed using a method wherein to the input of an IIR-type filter P 2 (Z “1 )/Q F (Z "1 ) is connected the following input sequence:
  • the output sequence of the filter P 2 (z “1 )/Q F (z “1 ) provides the parameter set a 0 , 2 , a ⁇ , 2 , a 2 , 2 , ... (A 2 ) of an FIR-type filter.
  • the number of parameters a , 2 , a ls2 , a 2 , 2 , ... can be determined using the test arrangement of FIG. 10, where J is selected such that the power level of error signal (e) becomes sufficiently low, e.g., reduced by 45 to 50 dB, as compared with the power level of the test signal (t).
  • the test signal (t) must be similar to the input signal of the Tomlinson- Harashima precoder filter.
  • FIG. 8 An alternative method of determining parameters ao, 2 , a ⁇ , 2 , a 2 , 2 , ..., a Js2 is illustrated in FIG. 8.
  • the parameters are determined with the help of an adaptive control algo- rithm (e.g., Least Means Square, LMS).
  • LMS Least Means Square
  • the number (J+l) of parameters can be made using the system of FIG. 8, because now the error signal (e) computed in the system of FIG. 8 is compatible with the difference between filter functions A 2 (z -1 ) ja P 2 (Z "1 )/Q F (Z "1 ) in the situation corresponding to a Tomlinson-Harashima precoder.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Power Engineering (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Cable Transmission Systems, Equalization Of Radio And Reduction Of Echo (AREA)
  • Filters That Use Time-Delay Elements (AREA)

Abstract

La présente invention concerne un procédé et un appareil de mise en oeuvre de la phase de connexion sur une voie de communication numérique bidirectionnelle au moyen du précodage de Tomlinson-Harashima dans une configuration dans laquelle le filtre du précodeur de Tomlinson-Harashima peut être du type à réponse impulsionnelle finie (RIF) ou du type à réponse impulsionnelle infinie (RII) et, respectivement, le filtre de l'égaliseur adaptatif à rétroaction des décisions est du type RII ou RIF. Dans ce procédé, lorsque c'est nécessaire, les paramètres du filtre de l'égaliseur à rétroaction des décisions sont convertis pour représenter un type de filtre désiré (RIF ou RII) soit avant, soit après l'envoi des paramètres, sur la voie de communication, à son extrémité opposée.
PCT/FI2003/000077 2002-01-30 2003-01-30 Procede et appareil de mise en oeuvre de la phase de connexion sur un chemin de communication numerique au moyen du precodage de tomlinson-harashima WO2003065667A1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
FI20020177A FI113517B (fi) 2002-01-30 2002-01-30 Menetelmä ja laitteisto Tomlinson-Harashima-esikoodausta soveltavan digitaalisen tietoliikenneyhteyden yhteydenmuodostusvaiheen toteuttamiseksi
FI20020177 2002-01-30

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2003065667A1 true WO2003065667A1 (fr) 2003-08-07

Family

ID=8562982

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/FI2003/000077 WO2003065667A1 (fr) 2002-01-30 2003-01-30 Procede et appareil de mise en oeuvre de la phase de connexion sur un chemin de communication numerique au moyen du precodage de tomlinson-harashima

Country Status (2)

Country Link
FI (1) FI113517B (fr)
WO (1) WO2003065667A1 (fr)

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0971516A2 (fr) * 1998-07-06 2000-01-12 Metalink Limited Précodeur de canal utilisant un filtre à réponse d'impulsion infinie
US6141386A (en) * 1996-03-11 2000-10-31 Micronas Intermetall Gmbh Asymmetric filter combination for a digital transmission system
WO2001050645A1 (fr) * 1999-12-30 2001-07-12 Tioga Technologies Inc. Emetteur-recepteur de donnees a filtrage et precodage

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6141386A (en) * 1996-03-11 2000-10-31 Micronas Intermetall Gmbh Asymmetric filter combination for a digital transmission system
EP0971516A2 (fr) * 1998-07-06 2000-01-12 Metalink Limited Précodeur de canal utilisant un filtre à réponse d'impulsion infinie
WO2001050645A1 (fr) * 1999-12-30 2001-07-12 Tioga Technologies Inc. Emetteur-recepteur de donnees a filtrage et precodage

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
FI20020177A7 (fi) 2003-07-31
FI20020177A0 (fi) 2002-01-30
FI113517B (fi) 2004-04-30

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7254198B1 (en) Receiver system having analog pre-filter and digital equalizer
EP1540820B1 (fr) Procede et appareil pour l'egalisation de canaux
EP0294897B1 (fr) Système de transmission de données comportant un égalisateur à décision récursive et utilisant le procédé à réponse partielle
US5999542A (en) Use of modified line encoding and low signal-to-noise ratio based signal processing to extend range of digital data transmission over repeaterless two-wire telephone link
US5471504A (en) Bilinear decision feedback equalizer
KR100848660B1 (ko) 트렐리스 디코더로부터의 출력에 의한 영향을 받는 가변 스텝 사이즈를 갖는 적응형 이퀄라이저
US20030072380A1 (en) Method and apparatus for cross-talk mitigation through joint multiuser adaptive pre-coding
US20030035495A1 (en) Method and apparatus for implementing a channel correction in a digital data link
US6243425B1 (en) Adaptive precoding system and method for equalizing communication signal
US8208529B2 (en) Equalization apparatus and method of compensating distorted signal and data receiving apparatus
US7409003B2 (en) Method and apparatus for implementing adaptive tomlinson-harashima precoding in a digital data link
EP1705824A2 (fr) Interface de cable duplex integral bidirectionelle à haut debit
US6324232B1 (en) Adaptive DC-compensation
WO2003065667A1 (fr) Procede et appareil de mise en oeuvre de la phase de connexion sur un chemin de communication numerique au moyen du precodage de tomlinson-harashima
US6519282B1 (en) Method for digital transmission of information
US7031414B2 (en) Combined feedforward filter for a decision feedback equalizer
CN118101396B (zh) 信息接收方法及基于ADC的SerDes系统
EP0971516A2 (fr) Précodeur de canal utilisant un filtre à réponse d'impulsion infinie
Wesolowski et al. A simplified two-stage equalizer with a reduced number of multiplications for data transmission over voiceband telephone links
EP1319291A1 (fr) Proc d et dispositif pour la mise en oeuvre d'un filtre coupe-bande auto-compens dans une liaison de communications de donn es num riques

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EC EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NO NZ OM PH PL PT RO RU SC SD SE SG SK SL TJ TM TN TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VC VN YU ZA ZM ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZM ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LU MC NL PT SE SI SK TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GQ GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase
NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: JP

WWW Wipo information: withdrawn in national office

Country of ref document: JP

点击 这是indexloc提供的php浏览器服务,不要输入任何密码和下载