WO2001052580A2 - Procede et systeme de selection d'un emplacement d'antenne optimal - Google Patents
Procede et systeme de selection d'un emplacement d'antenne optimal Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2001052580A2 WO2001052580A2 PCT/SE2001/000056 SE0100056W WO0152580A2 WO 2001052580 A2 WO2001052580 A2 WO 2001052580A2 SE 0100056 W SE0100056 W SE 0100056W WO 0152580 A2 WO0152580 A2 WO 0152580A2
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- terminal
- base station
- measured
- signal strength
- error rate
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
- H04W16/00—Network planning, e.g. coverage or traffic planning tools; Network deployment, e.g. resource partitioning or cells structures
- H04W16/18—Network planning tools
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
- H04W84/00—Network topologies
- H04W84/02—Hierarchically pre-organised networks, e.g. paging networks, cellular networks, WLAN [Wireless Local Area Network] or WLL [Wireless Local Loop]
- H04W84/10—Small scale networks; Flat hierarchical networks
- H04W84/14—WLL [Wireless Local Loop]; RLL [Radio Local Loop]
Definitions
- This invention relates generally to a method and system for selecting an antenna location. More particularly, this invention relates to a method and system for selecting a location for an antenna for a fixed radio terminal in a telecommunication system.
- Radio in the Local Loop cellular systems employing fixed cellular terminals, e.g., GSM/TDMA/WCDMA systems, satellite systems, and Wireless LAN systems.
- RLL Radio in the Local Loop
- the fixed terminals are installed quickly and in a manner such that later reinstallation will not be needed. It is also important that the terminals are installed with as low a path loss as possible to provide a good link budget and thereby minimize the number of base station sites required.
- the optimal spot for mounting an antenna is found by making signal strength measurements of the received signal at various locations and selecting the location with the strongest received signal strength. These signal strength measurements are often made by the terminal.
- a problem with this approach is that the terminals are typically not calibrated and may thus lead to inexact measurements. Assume, for example, that the terminals have a tolerance of ⁇ 4 dB in measured received signal strength as required, e.g., by the GSM specification. A margin of 4 dB has to be added to compensate for terminals reporting signal strengths higher or lower than the actual received signal strength. Then, if the actual received signal strength measured by a terminal to be installed is 4 dB too low, the indication from the terminal is 8 dB too low. Thus, the signal strength indicated by the terminal might be too low, though the location is acceptable. It might, therefore, be hard for the installer to find an acceptable location for installing the antenna.
- Interference can be estimated by measuring the bit error rate (BER).
- BER bit error rate
- a problem with BER measurements is that they generally require a long period of time to perform, thus adding significantly to the installation time. For example, a 10 ⁇ 3 BER target with a 6 dB margin for seasonal change means that a BER below 10 "5 should be measured. It may take up to 10 hours to collect enough measurements to ensure that the BER is below 10 "5 .
- this and other objects are met by a method and system for determining an optimal location for an antenna connected to a terminal.
- An initial location for the antenna is selected, and a signal is exchanged between, e.g., a base station and the antenna at the selected location.
- a signal strength of the signal is measured, and an interference level of the signal is estimated.
- the terminal may be mounted indoors or outdoors.
- the antenna may be mounted indoors, e.g., if the antenna is close to the base station, or outdoors.
- the signal strength may be measured at the terminal.
- the signal strength may be measured at the base station and reported to the terminal.
- the estimation of the interference level may be performed by measuring an error rate of the signal at the terminal or the base station.
- the signal may be attenuated by decreasing the output power from the base station or from the terminal.
- FIGS. 1 A and IB illustrate exemplary fixed radio communication systems according to the present invention.
- FIG. 2 illustrates a method according to exemplary embodiments.
- signal strength and signal interference are considered in determining where to install an antenna for a fixed terminal.
- the signal strength and the signal interference may by derived from several measurements averaged together or from a maximum measured value.
- FIG. 1 A illustrates a communication system with a fixed radio terminal, e.g., a fixed cellular terminal (FCT) 100, mounted indoors and an antenna unit 200 mounted outdoors.
- the FCT 100 receives signals from and transmits signals over an air interface 25 to, e.g., a base station 50, via the antenna unit 200.
- the FCT 100 may be connected to a telephone 500.
- the FCT 100 includes radio parts, digital parts and other parts, e.g., a power supply.
- the FCT 100 may include a data adaptor 105 for fax and data to facilitate communication with a personal computer 400 via a modem 300.
- the FCT 100 is connected to the antenna unit 200 via, e.g., a coaxial cable.
- the antenna unit 200 may, instead, be mounted indoors, e.g., if the terminal is placed close to the base station.
- FIG. IB illustrates an exemplary communication system according to another aspect of the invention.
- the radio parts are located outdoors.
- Other devices e.g., a data adaptor (FDA) 160 and a power supply (PS) 170, 180 may be located indoors to facilitate installation and replacement.
- received signal strength may be measured at the fixed terminal or at the antenna.
- external calibrated measurement equipment can be used, e.g., equipment connected to the external antenna.
- the terminal can be calibrated, e.g., in the factory, or hardware/software can be added in the terminal so that the terminal measures with higher accuracy.
- the signal strength may be measured by measuring the received signal strength in a signal transmitted from the radio terminal to the base station.
- the transmitted signal from the terminal has a relatively high accuracy, e.g., ⁇ 1 dB, thus affording an accurate measurement.
- the measurement equipment in the base station can be calibrated with a low relative increase in cost.
- the measured signal strength can be reported by the base station to the terminal, e.g., as a short message service (SMS) message.
- SMS short message service
- a BER measurement may be made at the terminal.
- the BER measurement may be made at the base station, and the result of the measurement may be sent to the terminal, e.g., as an SMS message.
- the terminal may transmit a known bit pattern to the base station, the base station may receive and re-transmit the pattern back to the terminal, and the terminal may then measure the BER in the received re-transmitted pattern.
- the BER measurement can be made faster by attenuating the received signal. Assume for example, that the target BER for an acceptable amount of interference is 10 "5 (including margin). If the received signal is attenuated by 6 dB, the BER target of 10 "5 translates into a target of about 10 "3 .
- Attenuation may be achieved by reducing the output power at the base station, if the BER measurement is made at the terminal, or by reducing the power of the terminal, if the BER measurement is made at the base station or if the BER measurement is made at the terminal using a re-transmitted pattern received from the base station.
- attenuation may be achieved using the downlink power control mechanism in which the radio terminal reports a measured signal strength to the base station which uses the reported measured signal strength to control the downlink output power. If the radio terminal purposely reports too high a measured signal strength during the measurement period, the base station responds by reducing the downlink output power, thus attenuating the signal received by the terminal.
- the terminal determines whether the selected location for the antenna is acceptable. This determination may be made, e.g., by a microprocessor in the terminal. For example, if the measured signal strength is within a predetermined range, and the BER is less than a predetermined target, the location is determined to be acceptable.
- the range for the measured signal strength depends, e.g., on the technology, environment, and the distance from the base station. For a GSM terminal, an example of an acceptable measured signal strength range may be -80 dBm to -90 dBm.
- FIG. 2 illustrates a method for selecting a location for mounting an antenna according to an exemplary embodiment.
- the method begins at step 200 at which an initial location of an antenna is selected based, e.g., on the direction of the base station.
- a signal is exchanged between the base station and the antenna at the selected location.
- a signal strength of the signal is measured. The signal strength may be measured, at the terminal or may be measured at the base station and reported to the terminal.
- an interference level of the signal is estimated based, e.g., on BER measurements made at the terminal or made at the base station and reported to the terminal.
- a determination is made whether the selected location is acceptable, based on the measured signal strength and the estimated interference level. If the location is not acceptable, the process starts again, and another location is selected. If the location is acceptable, the antenna and terminal are mounted at step 250.
- a location for mounting an antenna for a fixed radio terminal is selected based on measured signal strength and estimated interference level. According to exemplary embodiments, the selection of the location is made easily, quickly and accurately, leading to a low average line cost.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Mobile Radio Communication Systems (AREA)
Abstract
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
AU2001228962A AU2001228962A1 (en) | 2000-01-14 | 2001-01-12 | Method and system for selecting an optimal antenna location |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US48330300A | 2000-01-14 | 2000-01-14 | |
US09/483,303 | 2000-01-14 |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2001052580A2 true WO2001052580A2 (fr) | 2001-07-19 |
WO2001052580A3 WO2001052580A3 (fr) | 2002-01-24 |
Family
ID=23919534
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/SE2001/000056 WO2001052580A2 (fr) | 2000-01-14 | 2001-01-12 | Procede et systeme de selection d'un emplacement d'antenne optimal |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
AR (1) | AR026827A1 (fr) |
AU (1) | AU2001228962A1 (fr) |
UY (1) | UY26531A1 (fr) |
WO (1) | WO2001052580A2 (fr) |
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB2380898A (en) * | 2001-10-09 | 2003-04-16 | Motorola Inc | Arrangement for location registration in more than one communication network |
GB2447439A (en) * | 2007-02-02 | 2008-09-17 | Ubiquisys Ltd | Controlling maximum total transmit power of a base station to minimise interference |
US8463281B2 (en) | 2009-08-11 | 2013-06-11 | Ubiquisys Limited | Power setting |
Family Cites Families (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5463673A (en) * | 1993-04-29 | 1995-10-31 | Northern Telecom Limited | In-building radio deployment technique for wireless personal communications systems |
EP0696151A3 (fr) * | 1994-08-05 | 1999-02-17 | Ascom Business Systems Ag | Dispositif pour déterminer l'emplacement d'une station de base |
GB9525110D0 (en) * | 1995-12-08 | 1996-02-07 | Northern Telecom Ltd | An antenna assembly |
-
2001
- 2001-01-10 AR ARP010100101A patent/AR026827A1/es unknown
- 2001-01-12 AU AU2001228962A patent/AU2001228962A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2001-01-12 WO PCT/SE2001/000056 patent/WO2001052580A2/fr active Application Filing
- 2001-01-12 UY UY26531A patent/UY26531A1/es not_active Application Discontinuation
Cited By (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB2380898A (en) * | 2001-10-09 | 2003-04-16 | Motorola Inc | Arrangement for location registration in more than one communication network |
GB2380898B (en) * | 2001-10-09 | 2004-01-14 | Motorola Inc | Communication network location register and subscriber device |
GB2447439A (en) * | 2007-02-02 | 2008-09-17 | Ubiquisys Ltd | Controlling maximum total transmit power of a base station to minimise interference |
US8032142B2 (en) | 2007-02-02 | 2011-10-04 | Ubiquisys Limited | Access point power control |
GB2447439B (en) * | 2007-02-02 | 2012-01-25 | Ubiquisys Ltd | Access point power control |
US8463281B2 (en) | 2009-08-11 | 2013-06-11 | Ubiquisys Limited | Power setting |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO2001052580A3 (fr) | 2002-01-24 |
AR026827A1 (es) | 2003-02-26 |
AU2001228962A1 (en) | 2001-07-24 |
UY26531A1 (es) | 2001-03-16 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US5564075A (en) | Method and system for controlling the power at which an access packet is sent by a mobile in a mobile radio system | |
EP1050977B1 (fr) | Système de commande de puissance de transmission utilisant des messages d'accusé de réception | |
US7353040B2 (en) | Closed-loop power controlled radio communication system | |
CN101192871A (zh) | 减小中继系统间干扰的功率控制方法 | |
US20010012785A1 (en) | Methods and apparatus for power allocation on a reverse link power control channel of a communication system | |
AU3164500A (en) | A subscriber unit and method of cell selection for a cellular communication system | |
WO1999063679A1 (fr) | Procede et systeme pour l'estimation de la qualite du mode de communication dans un systeme de communications sans fil | |
WO2004086649A1 (fr) | Procede et systeme de reglage de puissance lors de la periode d'initialisation de canal de trafic dans un reseau cdma | |
KR20090055780A (ko) | 통신 시스템에서 단말의 위치정보에 기반한 송수신성능개선 방법 및 장치 | |
JP2005006319A (ja) | 移動通信用の基地局、アンテナ・アセンブリ、およびアンテナ・アセンブリの位置の決定方法 | |
US20040057507A1 (en) | Link estimation in a communication system | |
EP1442537B1 (fr) | Systeme de radiocommunication | |
EP1087543A1 (fr) | Procédé d'amélioration des performances d'accès d'utilisateur par ajustement de la puissance du signal de test | |
WO2001052580A2 (fr) | Procede et systeme de selection d'un emplacement d'antenne optimal | |
KR20020030807A (ko) | 통신 시스템에서 링크 선택 | |
KR100723804B1 (ko) | 스마트 안테나 통신 시스템의 호 절단 방지 장치 및 방법 | |
US20070225027A1 (en) | Initial downlink transmit power adjustment for non-real-time services using dedicated or shared channel | |
US6741866B1 (en) | Fade margin test | |
WO2011097414A1 (fr) | Localisation dans un réseau cellulaire à répéteur | |
KR101054077B1 (ko) | 단말-중계국 시스템 기반의 데이터 전송 방법 및 이를 위한단말 | |
WO2002060197A1 (fr) | Procede et systeme permettant de selectionner un emplacement d'antenne optimal dans un systeme de telecommunication | |
CN101471737B (zh) | 一种调整校准发送功率的方法及装置 | |
KR100561664B1 (ko) | Wcdma 시스템에서 통화품질 측정 방법 | |
US20060116120A1 (en) | Monitoring synchronisation of signal measurement reports | |
US20040203990A1 (en) | Method and system for power control in mobile radio system |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AK | Designated states |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY BZ CA CH CN CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT TZ UA UG UZ VN YU ZA ZW |
|
AL | Designated countries for regional patents |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GW ML MR NE SN TD TG |
|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application | ||
DFPE | Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101) | ||
AK | Designated states |
Kind code of ref document: A3 Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY BZ CA CH CN CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT TZ UA UG UZ VN YU ZA ZW |
|
AL | Designated countries for regional patents |
Kind code of ref document: A3 Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GW ML MR NE SN TD TG |
|
REG | Reference to national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: 8642 |
|
122 | Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase | ||
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: JP |