+

WO2000071993A1 - Systeme et procede de spectroscopie dans l'infrarouge proche pour identifier des cereales genetiquement modifiees - Google Patents

Systeme et procede de spectroscopie dans l'infrarouge proche pour identifier des cereales genetiquement modifiees Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2000071993A1
WO2000071993A1 PCT/US2000/014262 US0014262W WO0071993A1 WO 2000071993 A1 WO2000071993 A1 WO 2000071993A1 US 0014262 W US0014262 W US 0014262W WO 0071993 A1 WO0071993 A1 WO 0071993A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
gmo
grain
calibration
spectral data
sample
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2000/014262
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Charles R. Hurburgh, Jr.
Craig A. Heithoff
Glen R. Rippke
Original Assignee
Iowa State University Research Foundation, Inc.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Iowa State University Research Foundation, Inc. filed Critical Iowa State University Research Foundation, Inc.
Priority to AU50430/00A priority Critical patent/AU5043000A/en
Publication of WO2000071993A1 publication Critical patent/WO2000071993A1/fr

Links

Classifications

    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00—Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09—Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/63—Introduction of foreign genetic material using vectors; Vectors; Use of hosts therefor; Regulation of expression
    • C12N15/79—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts
    • C12N15/82—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts for plant cells, e.g. plant artificial chromosomes (PACs)
    • C12N15/8201—Methods for introducing genetic material into plant cells, e.g. DNA, RNA, stable or transient incorporation, tissue culture methods adapted for transformation
    • C12N15/8209—Selection, visualisation of transformants, reporter constructs, e.g. antibiotic resistance markers
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00—Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09—Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/63—Introduction of foreign genetic material using vectors; Vectors; Use of hosts therefor; Regulation of expression
    • C12N15/79—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts
    • C12N15/82—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts for plant cells, e.g. plant artificial chromosomes (PACs)
    • C12N15/8241—Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology
    • C12N15/8261—Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with agronomic (input) traits, e.g. crop yield
    • C12N15/8271—Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with agronomic (input) traits, e.g. crop yield for stress resistance, e.g. heavy metal resistance
    • C12N15/8274—Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with agronomic (input) traits, e.g. crop yield for stress resistance, e.g. heavy metal resistance for herbicide resistance
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N21/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of optical means, i.e. using sub-millimetre waves, infrared, visible or ultraviolet light
    • G01N21/17—Systems in which incident light is modified in accordance with the properties of the material investigated
    • G01N21/25—Colour; Spectral properties, i.e. comparison of effect of material on the light at two or more different wavelengths or wavelength bands
    • G01N21/31—Investigating relative effect of material at wavelengths characteristic of specific elements or molecules, e.g. atomic absorption spectrometry
    • G01N21/35—Investigating relative effect of material at wavelengths characteristic of specific elements or molecules, e.g. atomic absorption spectrometry using infrared light
    • G01N21/3563—Investigating relative effect of material at wavelengths characteristic of specific elements or molecules, e.g. atomic absorption spectrometry using infrared light for analysing solids; Preparation of samples therefor
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N21/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of optical means, i.e. using sub-millimetre waves, infrared, visible or ultraviolet light
    • G01N21/17—Systems in which incident light is modified in accordance with the properties of the material investigated
    • G01N21/25—Colour; Spectral properties, i.e. comparison of effect of material on the light at two or more different wavelengths or wavelength bands
    • G01N21/31—Investigating relative effect of material at wavelengths characteristic of specific elements or molecules, e.g. atomic absorption spectrometry
    • G01N21/35—Investigating relative effect of material at wavelengths characteristic of specific elements or molecules, e.g. atomic absorption spectrometry using infrared light
    • G01N21/359—Investigating relative effect of material at wavelengths characteristic of specific elements or molecules, e.g. atomic absorption spectrometry using infrared light using near infrared light
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N21/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of optical means, i.e. using sub-millimetre waves, infrared, visible or ultraviolet light
    • G01N21/84—Systems specially adapted for particular applications
    • G01N2021/8466—Investigation of vegetal material, e.g. leaves, plants, fruits
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N21/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of optical means, i.e. using sub-millimetre waves, infrared, visible or ultraviolet light
    • G01N21/84—Systems specially adapted for particular applications
    • G01N21/85—Investigating moving fluids or granular solids
    • G01N2021/8592—Grain or other flowing solid samples
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N2201/00—Features of devices classified in G01N21/00
    • G01N2201/12—Circuits of general importance; Signal processing
    • G01N2201/129—Using chemometrical methods
    • G01N2201/1293—Using chemometrical methods resolving multicomponent spectra
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N2201/00—Features of devices classified in G01N21/00
    • G01N2201/12—Circuits of general importance; Signal processing
    • G01N2201/129—Using chemometrical methods
    • G01N2201/1296—Using chemometrical methods using neural networks

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to analysis of grain and, more particularly, to identification of genetically modified grain.
  • GMO genetically modified
  • some new crops are genetically modified to produce grain with a nutrient composition specially designed to benefit a particular animal species, such as chickens or pigs.
  • a nutrient composition specially designed to benefit a particular animal species, such as chickens or pigs.
  • Such grain can command a premium price, provided that its identity is preserved through the chain of commerce, from the producer to the end user.
  • some countries have proposed labeling of foods containing genetically
  • Simple verification of labels and purchase receipts may not be sufficient to ensure the identity of a particular lot of grain as GMO or non-GMO grain.
  • non-GMO seed may be inadvertently mixed with non-GMO seed, or 20 vice versa.
  • the problem is complicated by the fact that firms buying the grain at original point of delivery locations, such as local grain elevators, ordinarily are not equipped to identify grain as GMO or non-GMO on site. Therefore, grain purchasers and processors may seek to impose warranty conditions on grain producers.
  • the present invention is directed to methods and systems for distinguishing between genetically modified (GMO) and non-GMO grains using near infrared (NLR) spectroscopy, either reflectance, absorbance or transmittance.
  • NLR spectroscopy can be used to differentiate GMO from non-GMO grain with a very high degree of accuracy upon calculation of NIR calibrations for individual GMO events. In this manner, NIR spectroscopy can be used to quickly verify the presence or absence of GMO grain.
  • Verification using NLR spectroscopy can reduce the difficulties associated with identity preservation of grain for seed companies, grain producers, grain processors, grain exporters and purchasers. Moreover, NLR spectroscopy requires little technical expertise and can provide results in a shorter period of time, compared to wet chemistry techniques.
  • NLR spectroscopy can be applied to analyze samples taken from a grain stream. Alternatively, individual samples can be taken or submitted manually and subjected to NLR spectroscopy. In either case, the use of NIR spectroscopy provides a rapid and accurate technique for identification of GMO grain, with little impact on grain throughput.
  • the NLR spectroscopy process can be automated, and can be implemented in part by adaptation of existing NLR spectroscopy equipment already used in many grain handling locations. Accordingly, this technique can be especially advantageous for high-throughput facilities, such as seed company production facilities or local grain elevators, where prompt verification, minimal cost, and limited technical intervention are desirable.
  • the NLR spectroscopy technique can be particularly useful for identification of GMO and non-GMO soybeans and corn.
  • Other types of grains, amenable to differentiation between GMO and non-GMO grains include small grains such as barley, oats, wheat, rye and rice. It is contemplated that NIR calibrations can be calculated for so-called "stacked" GMO events in grains, providing an indication for each event.
  • the NLR spectroscopy device can be coupled to a computer that processes the data and generates a discrete positive or negative indication concerning the presence or absence of GMO grain.
  • Users can make use of a catalog of calibrations between GMO and non-GMO products, which take into account differences in spectral signature between grain type, GMO event, and geographic regions.
  • the catalog can be organized to allow selection of the desired calibrations by the user.
  • the catalog can be stored by a computer associated with the NIR spectroscopy device, which permits calibrations to be selectively retrieved for use with spectral data from individual grain samples.
  • the present invention provides a method for distinguishing between genetically modified (GMO) and non-GMO grain, the method comprising subjecting a grain sample to near infrared spectroscopy to produce spectral data, and determining whether the grain sample contains GMO grain based on the spectral data.
  • GMO genetically modified
  • the present invention provides a system for distinguishing between genetically modified (GMO) and non-GMO grain, the system comprising a near infrared spectroscopy device that subjects a grain sample to near infrared spectroscopy to produce spectral data, and a processor that determines whether the grain sample contains GMO grain based on the spectral data produced by the near infrared spectroscopy device.
  • the present invention provides a method for distinguishing between genetically modified (GMO) and non-GMO grain, the method comprising measuring the infrared spectral signature of a grain sample, and determining whether the grain sample contains GMO grain based on the analysis.
  • the present invention provides a method for identifying genetically modified (GMO) grain, the method comprising analyzing a grain sample without application of wet chemical assay, and determining whether the grain sample contains GMO grain based on the analysis.
  • the present invention provides a method for identifying genetically modified (GMO) soybeans, the method comprising subjecting a sample of soybean seed to near infrared spectroscopy to produce spectral data, and determining whether the sample contains GMO soybeans based on the spectral data.
  • FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a system for identification of GMO grain
  • FIG. 2 is a flow diagram of a calibration and measurement process for GMO grain identification
  • FIG. 3 is a graph illustrating NLR spectral data for GMO and non-GMO grain samples
  • FIG. 4 is a histogram of calibration values for a first NIR spectroscopy device
  • FIG. 5 is a histogram of calibration values for a second NLR spectroscopy device.
  • FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a system 10 for identification of GMO grain.
  • system 10 includes an NLR spectroscopy device 12, a processor 14, a storage device 16, and a user input device 18.
  • Processor 14 controls device 12 to subject a grain sample 20 to near infrared spectroscopy.
  • Device 12 collects NLR spectral data from grain sample 20 and transmits the data to processor 14.
  • Processor 14 determines whether the grain sample contains GMO grain based on the spectral data.
  • Storage device 16 stores a catalog containing a plurality of calibration equations indicative of differences in spectral characteristics for particular GMO and non-GMO grains.
  • Processor 14 applies the spectral data to a calibration equation retrieved from storage device 16 to calculate a value.
  • Processor 14 can be realized by a general purpose computer, such as a personal computer or workstation, that executes program code to carry out the NIR spectroscopy process in combination with device 12. Alternatively, processor 14 can be integrated with device 12. Storage device 16, which stores a catalog of calibration equations, can be realized by a hard drive or removable media drive associated with the computer. In addition to code arranged to drive the spectroscopy process, processor 14 may execute statistical, analysis applications for generation of the calibration equations and application of spectral data to the calibration equations to identify GMO grain in grain sample 20.
  • a commercially available software application suitable for analyzing spectral data generated by NIR device 12 is the
  • NLR device 12 can take the form of a commercially available NIR device, such as the Foss GrainspecTM or Foss/Tecator LnfratecTM NLR instruments, available from Foss North America, of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, USA. Both instruments are presently used in a number of grain elevators throughout the Midwest United States to detect a variety of grain characteristics such as moisture, protein, oil, and fiber content. Both instruments operate in reflectance mode. With appropriate calibration equations, GMO grain identification can be implemented using existing NLR instruments, including those already installed at grain elevators.
  • New calibrations can be loaded into NLR device 12 or a memory coupled to an associated processor 14, and used to identify GMO grains.
  • a separate calibration is provided for each GMO event in each type of grain and for each type or model of NLR device 12. With adequate computing capacity in processor 14, all available calibrations for a product can be calculated almost simultaneously, providing quick feedback to a user concerning the genetic makeup of a grain sample and the presence of multiple GMO events.
  • Typical GMO grains are obtained by introduction into of plant of a preselected
  • GMO event introduces a gene(s) for a desired plant attribute.
  • Useful GMO events include, for example, genes conferring tolerance to herbicides such as glyphosate (Roundup ReadyTM), bromoxynil, sulfonylureas or phosphinothricin resistance genes, genes conferring insect resistance such as Bacillus thuringiensis endotoxin protein genes and genes for specialty traits such as improved amino acid composition, e.g., dihydrodipicolinic acid synthase genes, lOkD zein genes, 15kD zein genes, aspartate kinase genes, or soybean albumin seed protein genes, as well as antisense or ribozyme genes that inhibit expression of an endogenous gene.
  • Device 12 can be realized by an NLR instrument commonly used in local grain elevators to collect spectral data in the 850-1050 nm range to detect the characteristics of the samples. If device 12 is a Foss GrainspecTM, for example, spectral values are collected at 33 wavelengths in the 850-1050 nm range. If device 12 is a Foss/Tecator lnfratecTM, 100 spectral values in the same wavelength range are collected. Other NLR devices, which collect reflectance data in the mid-infrared spectral ranges (about 600-2500 nm) can also be used.
  • NLR devices are currently used to analyze grain for, e.g., moisture, protein, oil, fiber, and saturated fats, and typically complete the analysis in approximately 60 seconds per sample.
  • a wide range of samples is collected each harvest with distinct compositional values to make a range for the different calibrations.
  • the calibrations a set of multiple linear equations with spectral values, in Beer's Law form ln(l/T), as the independent variable, are statistically based upon the reference values of the samples collected.
  • FIG. 2 is a flow diagram of a calibration and measurement process for GMO grain identification.
  • the calibration process indicated generally by block 22, involves obtaining a representative product sample set, as indicated by block 24.
  • the sample set may include, for example, one hundred or more different samples of a particular grain type, each sample known to be GMO or non-GMO grain.
  • Each sample is subjected to NLR spectroscopy to collect spectral data, as indicated by block 26.
  • the spectral data are typically collected at a plurality of different wavelengths.
  • the spectral data also can be collected at a number of different sample temperatures to permit identification of temperature- induced variations in the spectral signature.
  • Reference values are then assigned to each sample such that a GMO event is a value of 1, whereas a non-GMO event is a value of 0, as indicated by block 30.
  • Processor 14 for example, can be appropriately programmed to carry out the desired assignment of a reference value.
  • the spectral data are subjected to pretreatment and statistical analysis, as indicated by block 32.
  • the spectral data can be smoothed, normalized, and filtered prior to application of a statistical analysis technique such as partial least squares (PLS), multiple linear regression (MLR), or neural network (NN) analysis.
  • PLS partial least squares
  • MLR multiple linear regression
  • NN neural network
  • Such pretreatment differs from known NIR spectral data pretreatments.
  • the usual objective of NIR calibrations is to make the calibrations insensitive to shifts in spectral data across the entire wavelength range. This permits the usual calibrations to identify relative differences in spectra between a reference sample and a test sample that result from quantitative differences in the chemical constituents of the grain (e.g., protein, oil, starch, individual amino acids and the like).
  • the pretreatments applied herein include the predicted constituent values of bias-insensitive calibrations in the independent variables. This type of pretreatment allows the statistical model to identify average spectral differences attributable to the GMO event
  • each calibration equation may correspond to one GMO event and may take the form of a multi-term equation, as indicated by block 38.
  • the statistical software calculates the best fit for the wavelength information to the reference value, i.e., discrete values of 1 or 0.
  • the linear form is not necessary, however, and the inclusion of the previously predicted constituent levels generally tends to make the calibration equations non-linear.
  • Calibration equations can be prepared and generated at various local sites, if desired. It ordinarily will be more desirable, however, to generate the calibration equations at a central laboratory and then distribute them to users in the field for installation, as indicated by block 40. Calibration equations can be distributed to a virtually unlimited number of NIR systems 10. For example, distribution can be by physical media such as CD-ROM, DVD-ROM and tapes, or by electronic downloads via dial-up or internet connections. In either case, the calibration equations can be widely disseminated, particularly to local grain elevators, and updated from time-to- time when new GMO varieties are being grown in a region.
  • the measurement process can be applied to identify the presence of GMO grains.
  • standardization is accomplished by applying a bias to the values calculated for the known samples by an individual unit.
  • a bias forces the values calculated by an individual unit to correspond to those obtained on a master unit, and can be achieved in software or hardware.
  • spectral data obtained from the spectroscopy device 12 can be modified in software or hardware to standardize the data to spectral data from the master unit, prior to use of the calibration in the GMO grain analysis process.
  • procedures can be used to adjust, wavelength by wavelength, the spectral data of all individual units before the calibration equation is calculated.
  • the bias approach which is in effect shifting the rounding point up or down from an initial value of 0.5, is expected to be the simplest and most adaptable method, since calibrations for the presence or absence of GMO grain require a discrete, qualitative classification.
  • spectral data is collected, as indicated by block 48, for the desired grain samples, indicated by block 50.
  • the grain samples can be manually prepared and placed within the NLR device by known techniques. Alternatively, the measurement process can be readily automated, e.g., using a conveyor that intermittently removes grain samples from a grain stream, prepares them for analysis and delivers them to the NLR device.
  • the processor associated with the NLR device computes event calibration values using the calibration equations, as indicated by block 52.
  • the processor may compute the event calibration values using any number of calibrations, as indicated by block 54. In this manner, a sample can be tested against calibrations for multiple GMO events, providing an indication of the presence or absence of each event to the user.
  • the calibration values can provide a simple "yes” or "no" indication of the presence of a GMO event, as indicated by blocks 56 and 58. By rounding values to 1 or 0, the value is always an integer, as indicated by block 60. In the embodiment of FIG. 2, if the calibration value is greater than or equal to 1, the sample is classified as a GMO grain of the respective event, as indicated by block 62. If the calibration is less than or equal to 0, the grain sample is classified as a non-GMO grain for the respective event, as indicated by block 64. The values could, of course, be reversed, i.e., 1 could be indicative of a non-GMO grain and 0 could be indicative of a GMO event.
  • the objective is to formulate the calibration equations to produce, from the spectral data, a simple indication of the presence or absence of a GMO event.
  • the output of the measurement process can be a discrete "yes” or “no,” or positive or negative result to be received by the user.
  • An indicator device such as a display, status light, or audible alarm can be coupled to the processor to facilitate notification of a user.
  • the user may receive more than one "yes” or "no” indications if multiple GMO event grain is analysed.
  • Raw measurement values can also be displayed on the indicator device, if so desired by a user.
  • the following example illustrates the application of a GMO grain identification technique in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • Experiments were conducted using Foss GrainspecTM and Foss/Tecator lnfratecTM NIR instruments, available from Foss North America, of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, USA.
  • the spectral data were analyzed with UnscramblerTM software, available from Camo A/S, of Oslo, Norway.
  • Grain samples were collected from strip-plots located in Bremer and Tama/Grundy counties in Iowa, USA, that contained soybeans known to be either GMO or non-GMO.
  • the GMO soybeans contained a gene conferring tolerance to glyphosate (RoundupTM), and are referred to herein as RR soybeans.
  • the non-GMO soybeans did not contain the glyphosate tolerance gene or any other transgene.
  • 35 samples came from the Bremer county plot and 28 came from the Tama/Grundy county plot.
  • 24 samples came from the Bremer county plot and 27 came from the Tama/Grundy county plot.
  • Samples from each plot were divided into non-RR and RR categories.
  • the samples were prepared run in the lnfratec and Grainspec devices successively.
  • the NLR data were collected, along with estimated protein, oil, fiber, and saturated fat percentages, calculated from existing calibrations.
  • the Grainspec device collects optical values at 33 wavelengths in the 850-1050 nm range.
  • the lnfratec device collects 100 values in the same wavelength range.
  • the calibration and subsequent user-operated measurement process is illustrated in the block diagram of FIG. 2.
  • composition results showed a very strong correlation between the two instruments, as indicated in Table 1 below, and little compositional difference between the two types of soybeans.
  • the nutritional composition of the samples was similar to that of the overall 1998 soybean harvest in Iowa.
  • FIG. 3 is a graph illustrating NIR spectral data for GMO and non-GMO grain samples.
  • the graph of FIG. 3 shows the difference in average spectral data between RR and non-RR samples.
  • Spectral data for non-RR samples is indicated by reference numeral 66
  • spectral data for RR samples is indicated by reference numeral 68.
  • the nearly constant difference means that the constituent calibration could be use to model this, but also that a specific regression intended to find differences would also be successful.
  • Samples lying on the extreme outer limits of the set were considered outliers and were not used in the determination of the line. Samples were outliers for a number of reasons. There were several damaged or incomplete scans. Samples were also at the optical extremes to the point where they could not be considered statistically part of the group. If the sample is on the outer edge of a grouping, it is considered not part of the family of centralized samples, which causes it to be recognized as an outlier. If the computed result for a non-RR sample was rounded to one or greater, the sample was identified incorrectly. If the computed result for a RR sample was rounded to zero or less, the sample was identified incorrectly.
  • the lnfratec calibration was used to test 39 additional soybean samples, 20 non-RR samples from Linn County, Iowa, and 19 RR samples from Clay County, Iowa. The results are shown in Table 3 below. With a -0.1 bias, 95% of the non-RR and 84% of the RR samples were identified correctly. The bias meant that the cutoff between non-RR and RR classification, i.e., the point at which there is the least overlap between types, was 0.4 instead of 0.5. The histogram of FIG. 5 had suggested that a lower cutoff value might be preferable. There were no outliers in the validation set. The bias improved the accuracy of identifying RR, but did not affect identification of non-RR soybeans. These results show that calibration equations could be developed to accurately distinguish between RR and non-RR soybeans.

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Biotechnology (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Spectroscopy & Molecular Physics (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Cell Biology (AREA)
  • Biophysics (AREA)
  • Plant Pathology (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • Pathology (AREA)
  • Investigating Or Analysing Materials By Optical Means (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention concerne une procédure d'essai permettant de distinguer une céréale génétiquement modifiée (OGM) d'une céréale non modifiée génétiquement au moyen d'une spectroscopie dans l'infrarouge proche. Des étalonnages obtenus pour des événements d'OGM individuels permettent d'identifier formellement une céréale OGM d'une céréale non OGM. La procédure est particulièrement utile sur des lieux de manutention ou de livraison de céréales, tels que des silos à grains locaux. Un logiciel de base et du matériel peuvent être incorporés dans le flux de grains pour permettre d'analyser des échantillons de grain de façon intermittente. Dans de nombreux cas, les étalonnages nécessaires peuvent être mis en oeuvre sur des instruments existants fonctionnant dans l'infrarouge proche.
PCT/US2000/014262 1999-05-24 2000-05-23 Systeme et procede de spectroscopie dans l'infrarouge proche pour identifier des cereales genetiquement modifiees WO2000071993A1 (fr)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU50430/00A AU5043000A (en) 1999-05-24 2000-05-23 Near infrared spectroscopy system and method for the identification of genetically modified grain

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US31727899A 1999-05-24 1999-05-24
US09/317,278 1999-05-24

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2000071993A1 true WO2000071993A1 (fr) 2000-11-30

Family

ID=23232939

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2000/014262 WO2000071993A1 (fr) 1999-05-24 2000-05-23 Systeme et procede de spectroscopie dans l'infrarouge proche pour identifier des cereales genetiquement modifiees

Country Status (2)

Country Link
AU (1) AU5043000A (fr)
WO (1) WO2000071993A1 (fr)

Cited By (24)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2002071040A3 (fr) * 2001-02-16 2003-02-27 Missouri Board Of Curators Uni Utilisation de la spectroscopie infrarouge pour l'analyse genotypique
WO2002064803A3 (fr) * 2001-02-09 2003-03-13 Monsanto Technology Llc Identification de semences ou de plantes a l'aide de marqueurs phenotypiques
DE10201094A1 (de) * 2002-01-09 2003-07-31 Versuchs & Lehranstalt Einzelkornanalysator und Verfahren zur Einzelkornanalyse
US6646264B1 (en) 2000-10-30 2003-11-11 Monsanto Technology Llc Methods and devices for analyzing agricultural products
US6865556B2 (en) 2001-02-09 2005-03-08 Monsanto Technology Llc Identification of seeds or plants using phenotypic markers
WO2008131905A1 (fr) * 2007-04-26 2008-11-06 Hans Joachim Bruins Procédé et dispositif pour caractériser un échantillon végétal
US7600642B2 (en) 2003-09-23 2009-10-13 Monsanto Technology, Llc High throughput automated seed analysis system
US7685768B2 (en) 2004-08-26 2010-03-30 Monsanto Technology Llc Automated testing of seeds
US7830504B2 (en) 2007-11-20 2010-11-09 Monsanto Technology Llc Automated systems and assemblies for use in evaluating agricultural products and methods therefor
US7934600B2 (en) 2002-04-04 2011-05-03 Monsanto Technology Llc Automated picking, weighing and sorting system for particulate matter
DE102010002403A1 (de) * 2010-02-26 2011-09-01 Endress + Hauser Process Solutions Ag Verfahren zur Rückverfolgung von schüttgutförmigen landwirtschaftlichen Erzeugnissen
US8189901B2 (en) 2007-05-31 2012-05-29 Monsanto Technology Llc Seed sorter
WO2013169809A1 (fr) * 2012-05-08 2013-11-14 Panaridus, Llc Système et appareil pour l'analyse d'une plante de guayule in situ
US8959833B2 (en) 2004-08-26 2015-02-24 Monsanto Technology Llc Methods of seed breeding using high throughput nondestructive seed sampling
US8997398B2 (en) 2006-03-02 2015-04-07 Monsanto Technology Llc Automated high-throughput seed sampler and methods of sampling, testing and bulking seeds
USRE45489E1 (en) * 2001-02-02 2015-04-28 Pioneer Hi Bred International Inc Automated high-throughput seed sample handling system and method
EP2865371A1 (fr) 2013-10-22 2015-04-29 Disphar International B.V. Granules à dissolution rapide
US9027278B2 (en) 2006-03-02 2015-05-12 Monsanto Technology Llc Automated contamination-free seed sampler and methods of sampling, testing and bulking seeds
US9170155B2 (en) 2012-05-08 2015-10-27 Panaridus, Llc System and apparatus for analysis of a guayule plant in situ
US9387518B2 (en) 2006-06-28 2016-07-12 Monsanto Technology Llc Small object sorting system and method
CN106546553A (zh) * 2016-10-31 2017-03-29 浙江大学 一种转基因大豆油的快速无损鉴别方法
CN107084943A (zh) * 2017-04-28 2017-08-22 浙江大学 一种快速获取转基因玉米草甘膦耐受性表型的方法
US9842252B2 (en) 2009-05-29 2017-12-12 Monsanto Technology Llc Systems and methods for use in characterizing agricultural products
US12048951B2 (en) 2020-06-30 2024-07-30 Monsanto Technology Llc Automated systems for use in sorting small objects, and related methods

Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5132538A (en) * 1991-05-24 1992-07-21 Nirsystems Incorporated Measuring percentage of protein in whole grain samples
RU2005352C1 (ru) * 1991-09-19 1994-01-15 Владимир Савельевич Феденко Способ определения специфичности эндоспермовых мутантов кукурузы к накоплению каротиноидов
RU2005353C1 (ru) * 1991-09-19 1994-01-15 Владимир Савельевич Феденко Способ идентификации мутантных форм кукурузы
WO1996024830A1 (fr) * 1995-02-10 1996-08-15 Wolfking Danmark A/S Procede d'evaluation du calibre particulaire d'une substance
US5668374A (en) * 1996-05-07 1997-09-16 Core Laboratories N.V. Method for stabilizing near-infrared models and determining their applicability
WO1998044140A1 (fr) * 1997-04-03 1998-10-08 Dekalb Genetics Corporation Lignees de mais resistantes aux glyphosates
WO1999040419A1 (fr) * 1998-02-06 1999-08-12 Dsquared Development, Inc. Dispositif d'analyse qualitative de grains

Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5132538A (en) * 1991-05-24 1992-07-21 Nirsystems Incorporated Measuring percentage of protein in whole grain samples
RU2005352C1 (ru) * 1991-09-19 1994-01-15 Владимир Савельевич Феденко Способ определения специфичности эндоспермовых мутантов кукурузы к накоплению каротиноидов
RU2005353C1 (ru) * 1991-09-19 1994-01-15 Владимир Савельевич Феденко Способ идентификации мутантных форм кукурузы
WO1996024830A1 (fr) * 1995-02-10 1996-08-15 Wolfking Danmark A/S Procede d'evaluation du calibre particulaire d'une substance
US5668374A (en) * 1996-05-07 1997-09-16 Core Laboratories N.V. Method for stabilizing near-infrared models and determining their applicability
WO1998044140A1 (fr) * 1997-04-03 1998-10-08 Dekalb Genetics Corporation Lignees de mais resistantes aux glyphosates
WO1999040419A1 (fr) * 1998-02-06 1999-08-12 Dsquared Development, Inc. Dispositif d'analyse qualitative de grains

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
DATABASE WPI Section Ch Week 9431, 15 January 1994 Derwent World Patents Index; Class C07, AN 94-253786, XP002052054, FEDENKO V S; GLUSHKO V V; STRUZHKO V S.: "Determination of specific tendency to accumulate carotenoids -in endosperm mutants of maize, involves measuring optical density of grain sample reflection at specified spectrum range." *
DATABASE WPI Section PQ Week 9431, 21 September 1994 Derwent World Patents Index; Class P13, AN 94-253787, XP002150792, "Procedure for identifying mutant varieties of maize in genetic studies of grain -performing fluorescence of seed sections illuminated at 375-390 nanometres and establishing mutant varieties as those with reduced fluorescence." *

Cited By (49)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6646264B1 (en) 2000-10-30 2003-11-11 Monsanto Technology Llc Methods and devices for analyzing agricultural products
USRE45489E1 (en) * 2001-02-02 2015-04-28 Pioneer Hi Bred International Inc Automated high-throughput seed sample handling system and method
WO2002064803A3 (fr) * 2001-02-09 2003-03-13 Monsanto Technology Llc Identification de semences ou de plantes a l'aide de marqueurs phenotypiques
US6865556B2 (en) 2001-02-09 2005-03-08 Monsanto Technology Llc Identification of seeds or plants using phenotypic markers
US7402731B2 (en) * 2001-02-09 2008-07-22 Monsanto Technology Llc Identification of seeds or plants using phenotypic markers
US8321135B2 (en) 2001-02-16 2012-11-27 The Curators Of The University Of Missouri Method and apparatus for predicting soybean seed resistance based on near-infrared spectroscopy
WO2002071040A3 (fr) * 2001-02-16 2003-02-27 Missouri Board Of Curators Uni Utilisation de la spectroscopie infrarouge pour l'analyse genotypique
DE10201094A1 (de) * 2002-01-09 2003-07-31 Versuchs & Lehranstalt Einzelkornanalysator und Verfahren zur Einzelkornanalyse
DE10201094B4 (de) * 2002-01-09 2007-04-26 Versuchs- und Lehranstalt für Brauerei in Berlin (VLB) Einzelkornanalysator und Verfahren zur Einzelkornanalyse
US7934600B2 (en) 2002-04-04 2011-05-03 Monsanto Technology Llc Automated picking, weighing and sorting system for particulate matter
US8752712B2 (en) 2002-04-04 2014-06-17 Monsanto Technology Llc Automated picking, weighing and sorting system for particulate matter
US8281935B2 (en) 2002-04-04 2012-10-09 Monsanto Technology Llc Automated picking, weighing and sorting system for particulate matter
US7600642B2 (en) 2003-09-23 2009-10-13 Monsanto Technology, Llc High throughput automated seed analysis system
US7685768B2 (en) 2004-08-26 2010-03-30 Monsanto Technology Llc Automated testing of seeds
US9986699B2 (en) 2004-08-26 2018-06-05 Monsanto Technology Llc Methods of seed breeding using high throughput nondestructive seed sampling
US11006593B2 (en) 2004-08-26 2021-05-18 Monsanto Technology Llc Methods of seed breeding using high throughput nondestructive seed sampling
US8959833B2 (en) 2004-08-26 2015-02-24 Monsanto Technology Llc Methods of seed breeding using high throughput nondestructive seed sampling
US12163196B2 (en) 2004-08-26 2024-12-10 Monsanto Technology Llc Methods of seed breeding using high throughput nondestructive seed sampling
US8997398B2 (en) 2006-03-02 2015-04-07 Monsanto Technology Llc Automated high-throughput seed sampler and methods of sampling, testing and bulking seeds
US10542661B2 (en) 2006-03-02 2020-01-28 Monsanto Technology Llc Automated high-throughput seed sampler and methods of sampling, testing and bulking seeds
US12196648B2 (en) 2006-03-02 2025-01-14 Monsanto Technology Llc Automated contamination-free seed sampler and methods of sampling, testing and bulking seeds
US11357159B2 (en) 2006-03-02 2022-06-14 Monsanto Technology Llc Automated high-throughput seed sampler and methods of sampling, testing and bulking seeds
US11293840B2 (en) 2006-03-02 2022-04-05 Monsanto Technology Llc Automated contamination-free seed sampler and methods of sampling, testing and bulking seeds
US10254200B2 (en) 2006-03-02 2019-04-09 Monsanto Technology Llc Automated contamination-free seed sampler and methods of sampling, testing and bulking seeds
US9551636B2 (en) 2006-03-02 2017-01-24 Monsanto Technology Llc Automated high-throughput seed sampler and methods of sampling, testing and bulking seeds
US9383291B2 (en) 2006-03-02 2016-07-05 Monsanto Technology Llc Automated contamination-free seed sampler and methods of sampling, testing and bulking seeds
US9027278B2 (en) 2006-03-02 2015-05-12 Monsanto Technology Llc Automated contamination-free seed sampler and methods of sampling, testing and bulking seeds
US11084064B2 (en) 2006-06-28 2021-08-10 Monsanto Technology Llc Small object sorting system and method
US11897003B2 (en) 2006-06-28 2024-02-13 Monsanto Technology Llc Small object sorting system and method
US9387518B2 (en) 2006-06-28 2016-07-12 Monsanto Technology Llc Small object sorting system and method
DE102007019790B4 (de) * 2007-04-26 2012-04-05 Hans Joachim Bruins Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Charakterisierung einer Pflanzenprobe
WO2008131905A1 (fr) * 2007-04-26 2008-11-06 Hans Joachim Bruins Procédé et dispositif pour caractériser un échantillon végétal
DE102007019790A1 (de) * 2007-04-26 2008-11-06 Hans Joachim Bruins Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Charakterisierung einer Pflanzenprobe
US8189901B2 (en) 2007-05-31 2012-05-29 Monsanto Technology Llc Seed sorter
US8965101B2 (en) 2007-05-31 2015-02-24 Monsanto Technology Llc Seed sorter
US9275265B2 (en) 2007-05-31 2016-03-01 Monsanto Technology Llc Seed sorter
US8401271B2 (en) 2007-05-31 2013-03-19 Monsanto Technology Llc Seed sorter
US8548222B2 (en) 2007-05-31 2013-10-01 Monsanto Technology Llc Seed sorter
US7830504B2 (en) 2007-11-20 2010-11-09 Monsanto Technology Llc Automated systems and assemblies for use in evaluating agricultural products and methods therefor
US9842252B2 (en) 2009-05-29 2017-12-12 Monsanto Technology Llc Systems and methods for use in characterizing agricultural products
DE102010002403A1 (de) * 2010-02-26 2011-09-01 Endress + Hauser Process Solutions Ag Verfahren zur Rückverfolgung von schüttgutförmigen landwirtschaftlichen Erzeugnissen
US9170155B2 (en) 2012-05-08 2015-10-27 Panaridus, Llc System and apparatus for analysis of a guayule plant in situ
US9291553B2 (en) 2012-05-08 2016-03-22 Panaridus, Llc System and apparatus for analysis of a guayule plant in situ
WO2013169809A1 (fr) * 2012-05-08 2013-11-14 Panaridus, Llc Système et appareil pour l'analyse d'une plante de guayule in situ
EP2865371A1 (fr) 2013-10-22 2015-04-29 Disphar International B.V. Granules à dissolution rapide
CN106546553A (zh) * 2016-10-31 2017-03-29 浙江大学 一种转基因大豆油的快速无损鉴别方法
CN107084943B (zh) * 2017-04-28 2019-06-25 浙江大学 一种快速获取转基因玉米草甘膦耐受性表型的方法
CN107084943A (zh) * 2017-04-28 2017-08-22 浙江大学 一种快速获取转基因玉米草甘膦耐受性表型的方法
US12048951B2 (en) 2020-06-30 2024-07-30 Monsanto Technology Llc Automated systems for use in sorting small objects, and related methods

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU5043000A (en) 2000-12-12

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
WO2000071993A1 (fr) Systeme et procede de spectroscopie dans l'infrarouge proche pour identifier des cereales genetiquement modifiees
Cozzolino et al. The use of near‐infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) to predict the composition of whole maize plants
Shenk et al. The application of near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) to forage analysis
Karoui et al. Mid-infrared spectrometry: A tool for the determination of chemical parameters in Emmental cheeses produced during winter
Delwiche Single wheat kernel analysis by near-infrared transmittance: protein content
Montes et al. Near‐infrared spectroscopy on combine harvesters to measure maize grain dry matter content and quality parameters
Torres et al. Developing universal models for the prediction of physical quality in citrus fruits analysed on-tree using portable NIRS sensors
WO2010042096A2 (fr) Systèmes et procèdes d'analyse de produits agricoles
Fassio et al. Determination of oil content in whole corn (Zea mays L.) seeds by means of near infrared reflectance spectroscopy
Porker et al. Classification and authentication of barley (Hordeum vulgare) malt varieties: combining attenuated total reflectance mid-infrared spectroscopy with chemometrics
Peiris et al. Estimation of the deoxynivalenol and moisture contents of bulk wheat grain samples by FT‐NIR spectroscopy
Velasco et al. Nondestructive assessment of protein content in single seeds of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) by near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy
US10690592B2 (en) Haploid seed classification using single seed near-infrared spectroscopy
Khalid et al. Divergence in single kernel characteristics and grain nutritional profiles of wheat genetic resource and association among traits
Raspor Bio-markers: traceability in food safety issues
Bock et al. Innovative uses of near‐infrared spectroscopy in food processing
Delwiche et al. Falling number of soft white wheat by near‐infrared spectroscopy: A challenge revisited
Wrigley Potential methodologies and strategies for the rapid assessment of feed-grain quality
Bahri et al. Application of visible and near-infrared spectroscopy for evaluation of ewes milk with different feeds
Ghirardo et al. Early prediction of wheat quality: analysis during grain development using mass spectrometry and multivariate data analysis
Namakula et al. Predicting starch content of cassava with near infrared spectroscopy in Ugandan cassava germplasm
Van Deynze et al. Seed colour assessment in Brassica napus using a Near Infrared Reflectance spectrometer adapted for visible light measurements
Bramble et al. Single-kernel near-infrared protein prediction and the role of kernel weight in hard red winter wheat
Gerisch et al. Development of a near‐infrared spectroscopy calibration for Hagberg falling number assessment of barley (Hordeum vulgare): A comparison of methods
Sissons et al. A small‐scale rapid screening protocol for quality traits of durum wheat

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY CA CH CN CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VN YU ZA ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
REG Reference to national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: 8642

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase
NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: JP

点击 这是indexloc提供的php浏览器服务，不要输入任何密码和下载