WO2000068861A8 - Benchmark analysis system - Google Patents
Benchmark analysis systemInfo
- Publication number
- WO2000068861A8 WO2000068861A8 PCT/US2000/013201 US0013201W WO0068861A8 WO 2000068861 A8 WO2000068861 A8 WO 2000068861A8 US 0013201 W US0013201 W US 0013201W WO 0068861 A8 WO0068861 A8 WO 0068861A8
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- performance
- issuer
- compared
- sector
- categories
- Prior art date
Links
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 abstract 2
- 238000013480 data collection Methods 0.000 abstract 1
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 abstract 1
- 230000000737 periodic effect Effects 0.000 abstract 1
- 230000008685 targeting Effects 0.000 abstract 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q40/00—Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
- G06Q40/08—Insurance
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Accounting & Taxation (AREA)
- Finance (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Technology Law (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Financial Or Insurance-Related Operations Such As Payment And Settlement (AREA)
Abstract
L'invention concerne un procédé et un système d'analyse d'évaluation des performances d'une société, généralement d'une société commerciale telle qu'un fournisseur de services financiers, par exemple, un émetteur de comptes de cartes de crédit, par rapport aux entreprises homologues ou concurrentes du même secteur. Un fournisseur principal d'évaluation des performances se voit attribuer des données concernant certaines catégories décisives des performances d'émetteurs (par exemple, les caractéristiques du solde du portefeuille du compte de l'émetteur, la gestion des risques, les performances financières, les opérations, et la satisfaction du détenteur de carte) pour un certain nombre des émetteurs homologues. Ces données sont alors analysées, sur une base pondérée visant le statut spécifique de l'émetteur au sein du secteur, et ensuite comparées sur une base intégrée avec des moyennes et des normes du secteur portant sur de tels paramètres de catégories décisives. Le recueil de données et la distribution des résultats peuvent être conduits par des canaux d'Internet abordables et sécurisés. Des rapports d'évaluation des performances peuvent être personnalisés pour répondre aux besoins analytiques de chaque émetteur. L'émetteur se voit ainsi attribuer des évaluations périodiques de ses propres performances et le rapport de ces performances comparé aux normes du secteur. L'évaluation de l'efficacité et des performances de l'émetteur, les prises de décisions stratégiques et la planification sont ainsi facilitées.The invention relates to a method and a system for analyzing the performance of a company, generally a commercial company such as a financial service provider, for example, a credit card account issuer, for example. compared to peer or competing companies in the same sector. A primary performance appraisal provider is assigned data regarding certain critical categories of issuer performance (for example, characteristics of the issuer account portfolio balance, risk management, financial performance, trading , and the satisfaction of the cardholder) for a certain number of peer issuers. These data are then analyzed, on a weighted basis targeting the specific status of the issuer within the sector, and then compared on an integrated basis with averages and sector standards relating to such parameters of decisive categories. Data collection and distribution of results can be conducted through affordable and secure Internet channels. Performance evaluation reports can be customized to meet the analytical needs of each issuer. The issuer is thus allocated periodic evaluations of its own performance and the report of this performance compared to industry standards. This makes it easier to assess the effectiveness and performance of the issuer, make strategic decisions and plan.
Priority Applications (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
AU52697/00A AU5269700A (en) | 1999-05-12 | 2000-05-12 | Benchmark analysis system |
EP00937546A EP1145166A1 (en) | 1999-05-12 | 2000-05-12 | Benchmark analysis system |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US13379299P | 1999-05-12 | 1999-05-12 | |
US60/133,792 | 1999-05-12 |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2000068861A2 WO2000068861A2 (en) | 2000-11-16 |
WO2000068861A8 true WO2000068861A8 (en) | 2001-07-19 |
Family
ID=22460327
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2000/013201 WO2000068861A2 (en) | 1999-05-12 | 2000-05-12 | Benchmark analysis system |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP1145166A1 (en) |
AU (1) | AU5269700A (en) |
WO (1) | WO2000068861A2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7359865B1 (en) * | 2001-11-05 | 2008-04-15 | I2 Technologies Us, Inc. | Generating a risk assessment regarding a software implementation project |
WO2003077168A1 (en) * | 2002-03-12 | 2003-09-18 | Akzo Nobel Coatings International B.V. | On-line benchmarking |
US7596523B2 (en) | 2002-09-09 | 2009-09-29 | Barra, Inc. | Method and apparatus for network-based portfolio management and risk-analysis |
WO2005057350A2 (en) * | 2003-12-05 | 2005-06-23 | Jill Eicher | Method for evaluating a business using experiential data |
US7921031B2 (en) * | 2006-11-29 | 2011-04-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | Custom survey generation method and system |
BRPI0815494A2 (en) | 2007-08-14 | 2015-07-14 | Visa Usa Inc | Method implemented by computer, and, system. |
US10546350B2 (en) | 2015-12-08 | 2020-01-28 | International Business Machines Corporation | Performance projection |
US10467635B1 (en) | 2016-01-28 | 2019-11-05 | Numerify, Inc. | Efficient cross customer analytics |
US10755280B2 (en) | 2017-01-13 | 2020-08-25 | Visa International Service Association | Segmented data analysis using dynamic peer groupings and automated rule implementation platform |
-
2000
- 2000-05-12 WO PCT/US2000/013201 patent/WO2000068861A2/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2000-05-12 AU AU52697/00A patent/AU5269700A/en not_active Abandoned
- 2000-05-12 EP EP00937546A patent/EP1145166A1/en not_active Withdrawn
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
AU5269700A (en) | 2000-11-21 |
WO2000068861A2 (en) | 2000-11-16 |
EP1145166A1 (en) | 2001-10-17 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Bushman et al. | Price discovery and dissemination of private information by loan syndicate participants | |
Jorion et al. | Informational effects of regulation FD: evidence from rating agencies | |
Simpson et al. | The link between corporate social and financial performance: Evidence from the banking industry | |
Chaney et al. | The effect of deferred taxes on security prices | |
Cosh et al. | Board share‐ownership and takeover performance | |
Williams et al. | Real effects of financial reporting on innovation: Evidence from tax law and accounting standards | |
Ozili | Financial inclusion: the globally important determinants | |
Brown et al. | Financial innovation, payment choice and cash demand–causal evidence from the staggered introduction of contactless debit cards | |
WO2000068861A8 (en) | Benchmark analysis system | |
Isibor et al. | Impact of electronic banking technology on customers satisfaction and economic growth in Nigeria | |
Mueller | InsurTech rising: A profile of the InsurTech landscape | |
Agarwal et al. | The opioid epidemic and consumer credit supply: Evidence from credit cards | |
Hoa Nguyen et al. | Three effects of stock repurchase on rival firms in Vietnam | |
Cherry et al. | Change in capitol: How a 60 Minutes exposé and the STOCK Act affected the investment activity of US Senators | |
Bony et al. | Practice of E-banking in commercial bank: An empirical study in Bangladesh | |
Koç | Assessing the financial performance of water user associations: a case study at Great Menderes basin, Turkey | |
Sarel et al. | Migrating customers to new distribution channels: The role of communication | |
Lee | Will self‐regulation work in protecting online privacy? | |
Mehrotra et al. | Cryptocurrency and ETF's-Regulatory Challenges-A Case for Progressive Regulators | |
Chaudhary et al. | An Investors’ Interest towards Mutual Funds: A Study of Kathmandu Valley, Nepal | |
Barth et al. | How to talk down your stock performance | |
Soewarso et al. | A comparative study of de jure and de facto disclosure between Australia and Singapore | |
Freedman et al. | Environmental reporting and the resurrection of social accounting | |
Bradley | Discussion of “analyst stock ownership and stock recommendations” | |
Chen et al. | Life in the fast lane: sophistication among individual investors |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AK | Designated states |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY CA CH CN CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT TZ UA UG UZ VN YU ZA ZW |
|
AL | Designated countries for regional patents |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW SD SL SZ TZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GW ML MR NE SN TD TG |
|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application | ||
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2000937546 Country of ref document: EP |
|
DFPE | Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101) | ||
AK | Designated states |
Kind code of ref document: C1 Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY CA CH CN CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT TZ UA UG UZ VN YU ZA ZW |
|
AL | Designated countries for regional patents |
Kind code of ref document: C1 Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW SD SL SZ TZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GW ML MR NE SN TD TG |
|
D17 | Declaration under article 17(2)a | ||
WWP | Wipo information: published in national office |
Ref document number: 2000937546 Country of ref document: EP |
|
REG | Reference to national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: 8642 |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase in: |
Ref country code: JP |
|
WWW | Wipo information: withdrawn in national office |
Ref document number: 2000937546 Country of ref document: EP |