+

WO1999031199A1 - Selective adsorption process for resid upgrading - Google Patents

Selective adsorption process for resid upgrading Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO1999031199A1
WO1999031199A1 PCT/US1998/026608 US9826608W WO9931199A1 WO 1999031199 A1 WO1999031199 A1 WO 1999031199A1 US 9826608 W US9826608 W US 9826608W WO 9931199 A1 WO9931199 A1 WO 9931199A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
adsorbent
oil
solvent
metals
feedstream
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US1998/026608
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Martin Leo Gorbaty
David Thomas Ferrughelli
William Neergaard Olmstead
Sabato Miseo
Stuart Leon Soled
Winston Karl Robbins
Original Assignee
Exxon Research And Engineering Company
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Exxon Research And Engineering Company filed Critical Exxon Research And Engineering Company
Priority to EP98963928A priority Critical patent/EP1062296A4/en
Priority to CA002313217A priority patent/CA2313217A1/en
Publication of WO1999031199A1 publication Critical patent/WO1999031199A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G25/00Refining of hydrocarbon oils in the absence of hydrogen, with solid sorbents
    • C10G25/003Specific sorbent material, not covered by C10G25/02 or C10G25/03
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G25/00Refining of hydrocarbon oils in the absence of hydrogen, with solid sorbents

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to the refining of hydrocarbon feedstocks. More particularly, this invention concerns the segregation and removal of coke precursors and metals from atmospheric and vacuum residua, and deasphaltened vacuum residua.
  • Hydrocarbon feedstocks are composed of hydrocarbons and heteroatom containing hydrocarbons which differ in boiling point, molecular weight and chemical structure.
  • High boiling, high molecular weight heteroatom-containing hydrocarbons weight e.g. asphaltenes
  • coke precursors metals and carbon forming constituents
  • lower boiling naphtha and distillate fractions because coke precursors form coke during thermal processing (such as is employed in a modem refinery), it is desirable to remove (or at least segregate) the heteroatom containing hydrocarbons containing the metals and coke precursors, thereby facilitating further processing of the more valuable fractions of the feedstock.
  • the present invention is a process to remove a major portion of metals and coke precursors from a hydrocarbon or heteroatom- containing hydrocarbon feedstream.
  • the feedstream is contacted with an adsorbent that adsorbs the metals and coke precursors.
  • the feedstream effluent is transferred to another vessel.
  • the metals and coke precursors are then removed from the adsorbent by a suitable solvent.
  • Figure 1 shows a schematic diagram of the process of one embodiment of the present invention, illustrating how metals and coke precursors would be removed from deasphaltened oil (DAO), the product from a solvent deasphalter.
  • DAO deasphaltened oil
  • Figure 2 shows a schematic diagram of another embodiment of the present invention illustrating upgrading a residuum from either atmospheric or vacuum distillation.
  • the present invention is an adsorption process to remove a significant amount of metals and coke precursors from a hydrocarbon feedstream, and to render that stream more valuable as a fuel or as feed to a catalytic cracker.
  • Any hydrocarbonaceous liquid containing metals and coke precursors may be used for the feedstream of this invention.
  • These may include atmospheric and vacuum residua, vacuum gas oils, solvent deasphalting (SDA) fractions with and without resins, and even whole crude oils, particularly those containing high levels of nickel and vanadium such as found in Venezuela tars for example. While any of these liquids may be used as a feedstock if the results are economically justified, particularly useful feedstreams for this invention are atmospheric and vacuum residua.
  • the effluent from the feedstieam will then provide a clean cat cracker feed.
  • the adsorption process uses a hydrocarbon insoluble adsorbent material, which has a high capacity for adsorbing metals and coke precursors, and which can be easily regenerated by washing with relatively polar solvents or solvent mixtures, or by other processes including those with pyrolysis or combustion steps.
  • FIG. 1 shows a schematic diagram of one embodiment of the process of the present invention aimed at upgrading a solvent deasphalted heavy oil.
  • the effluent from a solvent deasphalter (SDA), composed of a deasphaltened oil (DAO) in about 4-6 volumes of deasphalting solvent, such as pentane at about 120-160°C is passed into a vessel containing the adsorbent.
  • the adsorbent may be a fixed bed.
  • the reactor effluent is transferred to another vessel labeled "CSR", where the deasphalting solvent (e.g., pentane) is removed and recycled to the SDA, while the product, an upgraded deasphaltened oil, is an acceptable cat cracker feed ( ⁇ about 4 ppm metals and ⁇ about 4 wt% coke precursors).
  • the upgraded deasphaltened oil is sent to a cat cracker to be fed directly or blended with conventional vacuum gas oil (VGO).
  • VGO vacuum gas oil
  • the swing reactor configuration in Figure 1 is set up such that one vessel is set up for adsorption, while the other is set up for adsorbent regeneration.
  • regeneration is carried out by using solvents such as toluene, toluene-methanol, or other appropriate solvents available in a refinery environment.
  • solvents such as toluene, toluene-methanol, or other appropriate solvents available in a refinery environment.
  • the metal containing and coke precursor molecules are washed off the adsorbent, the solution containing these impurities is stripped in the box labeled "SEP'N", the solvent recycled and the impurities stream sent to a coker, partial oxidation unit or other disposal technique.
  • FIG. 2 shows a schematic diagram of a second embodiment of the process of the present invention aimed at upgrading a residuum from either atmospheric or vacuum distillation.
  • the residuum is passed into a vessel containing the adsorbent. After contacting the adsorbent for an appropriate time, the effluent is an upgraded residuum with lowered metals and coke precursor content.
  • the upgraded residuum flows on to further refining processing, such as cat cracking, where it is treated either directly or blended with other refinery streams, such as conventional vacuum gas oil (VGO).
  • VGO vacuum gas oil
  • the swing reactor configuration in Figure 2 is set up such that one vessel is set up for adsorption, while the other vessel is set up for adsorbent regeneration.
  • regeneration is carried out by using solvents such as toluene, toluene- methanol, or other appropriate solvents available in a refinery environment.
  • solvents such as toluene, toluene- methanol, or other appropriate solvents available in a refinery environment.
  • the metal containing and coke precursor molecules are washed off the adsorbent, the solution containing these impurities is stripped in the box labeled "SEP'N", the solvent is recycled and the impurities stream sent to a coker, partial oxidation unit or other disposal technique.
  • Suitable adsorbents for the present process include hydrocarbon insoluble inorganic and carbonaceous materials, which have surface areas greater than 100 m 2 /g and whose surfaces may be acidic.
  • Specific examples of adsorbents useful for this process include silica, silica-alumina, K-10 and similar acid-treated clays and activated carbons, with surface areas ⁇ 1000 m 2 /g.
  • a preferred feedstieam to adsorbent ratio is between 0J and 10 wt/wt.
  • the present invention shall be illustrated by examples using feedstreams of Arabian Light atmospheric residuum, effluent from solvent deasphalters and various acceptable adsorbents and process solvents.
  • ALAR is one example of a feedstieam suitable for the present process.
  • ALAR Arabian Light atmospheric residuum
  • solvent and adsorbent ratio of 4 solvent: 1 adsorbent: 1 oil
  • Solvents were used in the room temperature experiments in order to keep the viscosity within a workable range.
  • elevated temperatures e.g. 200 °C
  • solvents are not necessary for the contacting of oil with adsorbent.
  • the solvent was removed on a rotary evaporator yielding a clean oil.
  • the adsorbed material was treated first with toluene, then a 1: 1 (by volume) toluene :methanol mixture to desorb it from the adsorbent.
  • Data in Table 1 show that, compared to starting ALAR, the product oils treated by the method of this invention contained very low levels of metals and showed a significant enough reduction of coke precursors as measured by the decrease in % CCR such that the product could be fed directly to a cat cracker.
  • the adsorbents used include silica, calcined at 600°C. It has a surface area of 300 m 2 /g and a reported pore diameter of 150 A. Another is amorphous silica-alumina (87 wt% silica), whose surface area and pore diameter are 318 m 2 /g and 105 A respectively.
  • a mixture of one part by weight oil, 4 parts by weight solvent, and 1 part by weight adsorbent were combined and allowed to stir for 16 hours.
  • the adsorbent was separated by filtering through a medium porosity buchner funnel.
  • the solvent was removed from the filtrate by roto-evaporation.
  • the resulting oil was analyzed for %CCR and metals.
  • the recovered adsorbent was treated with a 25% ethanol in toluene at reflux in a Soxhlet extractor, until no further color was released.
  • the solvent was removed by roto-evaporation, and the residue analyzed for metals and CCR.
  • This example illustrates adsorbent regeneration by heating.
  • the filtered solid from Example 3 was heated to 490°C for 2h under flowing nitrogen, cooled to room temperature and the adsorption experiment described above repeated using this solid.
  • the recovered oil (90% of starting oil) had a CCR of 4.8% and contained 4.0 ppm V and 3.0 ppm Ni.
  • This example illustrates adsorbent regeneration by heating.
  • the filtered solid from Example 7 was heated to 490 °C for 2h under flowing nitrogen, cooled to room temperature and the adsorption experiment described above repeated using this solid.
  • the recovered oil (89% of starting oil) had a CCR of 3.9% and contained 3.0 ppm V and 2.0 ppm Ni.
  • the example illustrates the process without use of a solvent.
  • 60.0 g of Arabian Light Atmospheric residuum was heated to 200 °C with stirring and 30 g of a silica-alumina material designated MS-13 (containing 13% alumina), previously calcined at 600°C, was added.
  • MS-13 silica-alumina material
  • the mixture was sti ⁇ ed for 16 hours at 200 °C.
  • the oil was decanted from the solids and analyzed.
  • the treated oil had a CCR of 4.7% and contained 1 ppm V and 1 ppm Ni.
  • a fresh sample of 7.4 g of Heavy Arab Vacuum Resid (975°F+) containing a % CCR of 22.1%, 55 ppm Ni, and 190 ppm V was mixed with 30 ml o-xylene and heated to 100°C at which time 12 g of calcined (600°C) silica was added. The mixture was brought to 140°C and refluxed for 6 hours. The solvent was then removed by roto-evaporation and 100 ml pentane was added to the flask and stined for 16 hours at 25°C. The mixture was then filtered and the pentane removed by roto-evaporation to recover the pentane soluble oil (64.4%).
  • the DAO had a % CCR of 5.01% and contained 3 ppm Ni and ⁇ 1 ppm V.
  • the pentane insoluble oil (35.6%) was removed from the adsorbent with a 25% methanol/75% toluene mixture.
  • SDA also provides a feedstream for the present process.
  • Solvent deasphalting is another way of separating metals and coke precursors from residua.
  • DAO deasphaltened oil
  • the yield and cleanliness of DAO defined the economic limit of how much deasphalting can be done. For example, using n-pentane approximately 75% yield of DAO can be obtained from a Baytown vacuum residuum. However, this DAO contains about 11% Conradson carbon and about 70 ppm of metals.
  • propane or butane in SDA a good quality cat cracker feed stock can be obtained but in yields between 35-50%. This has the effect of limiting the amount of resid cat cracking possible by using SDA.
  • the present process provides a simple way to clean up the DAO after SDA, or the feed to SDA, or to isolate the impurities during SDA, which would remove the bottleneck and allow the use of SDA to produce high yields of DAO as cat cracker feed stock, leading to more resid conversion.
  • the effluent from SDA composed of a DAO in about 4-6 volumes of pentane, at about 120-160°C is passed into a vessel containing the adsorbent. After contacting for an appropriate time, the reactor effluent is transferred to another vessel labeled "CSR" where the pentane is removed and recycled to the SDA process, while the product, now an acceptable cat cracker feed ( ⁇ 4 ppm metals and ⁇ 4 wt% coke precursors) is sent to a cat cracker to be fed directly or blended with conventional VGO (see Figure 1).
  • the adsorbents used include silica, calcined at 600°C. It had a surface area of 300 m 2 /g and a reported pore diameterof 150 A. Another is amoiphous silica-alumina (87 wt% silica), whose surface area and average pore diameter were determined to be 318 m /g and 105 A respectively. Data for calcined silica are shown in the attached Table 2, along with a non-limiting experimental protocol. In this protocol, a DAO was combined with a solvent (ratio of 4 parts solvent: 1 DAO), heated to temperature, and the adsorbent added at a treat rate of 2: 1 adsorbent to feed oil.
  • NONANE 140 72 5.0 1.0 0.5 84.88 11.75 0.15 3.09 1.66
  • a wt% mixture of one part oil, 4 parts solvent and 2 parts adsorbent were refluxed at 140°C for 6 hours.
  • the solvent was removed by roto- evaporation.
  • Pentane was added in a ratio of 10: 1 (solvent to oil) and the mixture was stined for 16 hours.
  • the pentane soluble oil was separated by filtering through a medium porosity buchner funnel.
  • the pentane was removed from the filtrate by roto-evaporation.
  • the resulting oil was analyzed for % CCR and metals.
  • the pentane insoluble portion of the oil was removed from the adsorbent by treating with a more polar solvent or solvent mixture in a ratio of 10: 1 (solven oil).
  • the pentane insoluble oil was removed from the silica by stirring overnight at 25°C in a mixture of 25% methanol/75% toluene and filtering to recover the pentane insoluble oil (23%) and regenerated adsorbent.
  • Example 12 A fresh sample of one part Baytown DAO (see Example 12) and 4 parts nonane were heated to 100°C at which time 2 parts silica (Example 12) was added. The mixture was brought to 140°C and refluxed for 6 hours. The workup was as described in Example 12. The resulting oil had a reduced % CCR and was virtually metal free (see Table 2).
  • Example 12 A fresh sample of one part Baytown DAO (see Example 12) and 4 parts heptane were heated to 100°C at which time 2 parts silica (Example 12) was added. The mixture was refluxed at 100°C for 6 hours. The workup was as described in Example 12. The resulting oil had a reduced % CCR and was virtually metal free (see Table 2).
  • Example 16 A fresh sample of one part Baytown DAO (see Example 12) and 4 parts heptane were heated to 100°C at which time 2 parts silica (Example 12) was added. The mixture was refluxed at 100°C for 6 hours. The workup was as described in Example 12. The resulting oil had a reduced % CCR and was virtually metal free (see Table 2).
  • Example 16 A fresh sample of one part Baytown DAO (see Example 12) and 4 parts heptane were heated to 100°C at which time 2 parts silica (Example 12) was added. The mixture was refluxed at 100°C for 6 hours. The work
  • Example 12 A fresh sample of one part Baytown DAO (see Example 12) and 4 parts o-xylene were heated to 100°C at which time 2 parts of an uncalcined silica (87%)/alumina (13%) mixture was added. The mixture was brought to 140°C and refluxed for 6 hours. The workup was described in Example 12. The resulting oil (69%) had a % CCR of 3.19% and contained ⁇ 3.0ppm Ni and ⁇ 0.5 ppm V.
  • Example 19 A fresh sample of one part Baytown DAO (see Example 12) and 4 parts o-xylene were heated to 100°C at which time 2 parts of an uncalcined silica (87%)/alumina (13%) mixture was added. The mixture was brought to 140°C and refluxed for 6 hours. The workup was described in Example 12. The resulting oil (69%) had a % CCR of 3.19% and contained ⁇ 3.0ppm Ni and ⁇ 0.5 ppm V.
  • Example 19 A fresh sample of one part Baytown DAO
  • Example 12 A fresh sample of one part Baytown DAO (see Example 12) and 4 parts toluene was prepared at which time 1 part of Norit activated carbon was added. The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 16 h. The workup was described in Example 12. The resulting oil (85%) had a % CCR of 6.5% and contained 1.0 ppm Ni and 7 ppm V.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Production Of Liquid Hydrocarbon Mixture For Refining Petroleum (AREA)

Abstract

The present invention is a process to remove a major portion of metals and coke precursors from a hydrocarbon stream. The steps of the process include contacting the feedstream with a hydrocarbon insoluble adsorbent, recovering the oil which does not adsorb and removing the metals and coke precursors from the adsorbent.

Description

SELECTIVE ADSORPTION PROCESS FOR RESID UPGRADING
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to the refining of hydrocarbon feedstocks. More particularly, this invention concerns the segregation and removal of coke precursors and metals from atmospheric and vacuum residua, and deasphaltened vacuum residua.
Hydrocarbon feedstocks, whether derived from natural petroleum or synthetic sources, are composed of hydrocarbons and heteroatom containing hydrocarbons which differ in boiling point, molecular weight and chemical structure. High boiling, high molecular weight heteroatom-containing hydrocarbons weight (e.g. asphaltenes) are known to contain a greater proportion of metals and carbon forming constituents (i.e. coke precursors) than lower boiling naphtha and distillate fractions. Because coke precursors form coke during thermal processing (such as is employed in a modem refinery), it is desirable to remove (or at least segregate) the heteroatom containing hydrocarbons containing the metals and coke precursors, thereby facilitating further processing of the more valuable fractions of the feedstock.
SUMMARY OF THE PRESENT INVENTION
Accordingly, the present invention is a process to remove a major portion of metals and coke precursors from a hydrocarbon or heteroatom- containing hydrocarbon feedstream. The feedstream is contacted with an adsorbent that adsorbs the metals and coke precursors. The feedstream effluent is transferred to another vessel. The metals and coke precursors are then removed from the adsorbent by a suitable solvent. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Figure 1 shows a schematic diagram of the process of one embodiment of the present invention, illustrating how metals and coke precursors would be removed from deasphaltened oil (DAO), the product from a solvent deasphalter.
Figure 2 shows a schematic diagram of another embodiment of the present invention illustrating upgrading a residuum from either atmospheric or vacuum distillation.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
The present invention is an adsorption process to remove a significant amount of metals and coke precursors from a hydrocarbon feedstream, and to render that stream more valuable as a fuel or as feed to a catalytic cracker. Any hydrocarbonaceous liquid containing metals and coke precursors, regardless of source, may be used for the feedstream of this invention. These may include atmospheric and vacuum residua, vacuum gas oils, solvent deasphalting (SDA) fractions with and without resins, and even whole crude oils, particularly those containing high levels of nickel and vanadium such as found in Venezuela tars for example. While any of these liquids may be used as a feedstock if the results are economically justified, particularly useful feedstreams for this invention are atmospheric and vacuum residua. The effluent from the feedstieam will then provide a clean cat cracker feed. The adsorption process uses a hydrocarbon insoluble adsorbent material, which has a high capacity for adsorbing metals and coke precursors, and which can be easily regenerated by washing with relatively polar solvents or solvent mixtures, or by other processes including those with pyrolysis or combustion steps.
Figure 1 shows a schematic diagram of one embodiment of the process of the present invention aimed at upgrading a solvent deasphalted heavy oil. In the figure, the effluent from a solvent deasphalter (SDA), composed of a deasphaltened oil (DAO) in about 4-6 volumes of deasphalting solvent, such as pentane at about 120-160°C is passed into a vessel containing the adsorbent. The adsorbent may be a fixed bed. After contacting for an appropriate time, the reactor effluent is transferred to another vessel labeled "CSR", where the deasphalting solvent (e.g., pentane) is removed and recycled to the SDA, while the product, an upgraded deasphaltened oil, is an acceptable cat cracker feed (< about 4 ppm metals and < about 4 wt% coke precursors). The upgraded deasphaltened oil is sent to a cat cracker to be fed directly or blended with conventional vacuum gas oil (VGO). The swing reactor configuration in Figure 1 is set up such that one vessel is set up for adsorption, while the other is set up for adsorbent regeneration. In the Figure, regeneration is carried out by using solvents such as toluene, toluene-methanol, or other appropriate solvents available in a refinery environment. The metal containing and coke precursor molecules are washed off the adsorbent, the solution containing these impurities is stripped in the box labeled "SEP'N", the solvent recycled and the impurities stream sent to a coker, partial oxidation unit or other disposal technique.
Figure 2 shows a schematic diagram of a second embodiment of the process of the present invention aimed at upgrading a residuum from either atmospheric or vacuum distillation. In the Figure, the residuum is passed into a vessel containing the adsorbent. After contacting the adsorbent for an appropriate time, the effluent is an upgraded residuum with lowered metals and coke precursor content. The upgraded residuum flows on to further refining processing, such as cat cracking, where it is treated either directly or blended with other refinery streams, such as conventional vacuum gas oil (VGO). The swing reactor configuration in Figure 2 is set up such that one vessel is set up for adsorption, while the other vessel is set up for adsorbent regeneration. In the Figure, regeneration is carried out by using solvents such as toluene, toluene- methanol, or other appropriate solvents available in a refinery environment. The metal containing and coke precursor molecules are washed off the adsorbent, the solution containing these impurities is stripped in the box labeled "SEP'N", the solvent is recycled and the impurities stream sent to a coker, partial oxidation unit or other disposal technique.
Suitable adsorbents for the present process include hydrocarbon insoluble inorganic and carbonaceous materials, which have surface areas greater than 100 m2/g and whose surfaces may be acidic. Specific examples of adsorbents useful for this process include silica, silica-alumina, K-10 and similar acid-treated clays and activated carbons, with surface areas <1000 m2/g. A preferred feedstieam to adsorbent ratio is between 0J and 10 wt/wt.
The present invention shall be illustrated by examples using feedstreams of Arabian Light atmospheric residuum, effluent from solvent deasphalters and various acceptable adsorbents and process solvents.
I. Arabian Light Atmospheric Residuum (ALAR)
ALAR is one example of a feedstieam suitable for the present process. In this protocol, an Arabian Light atmospheric residuum, (ALAR), was combined with a solvent and adsorbent (ratio of 4 solvent: 1 adsorbent: 1 oil), held at room temperature for 16 his. Solvents were used in the room temperature experiments in order to keep the viscosity within a workable range. At elevated temperatures (e.g., 200 °C ) solvents are not necessary for the contacting of oil with adsorbent. Following filtration, the solvent was removed on a rotary evaporator yielding a clean oil. The adsorbed material was treated first with toluene, then a 1: 1 (by volume) toluene :methanol mixture to desorb it from the adsorbent. Data in Table 1 show that, compared to starting ALAR, the product oils treated by the method of this invention contained very low levels of metals and showed a significant enough reduction of coke precursors as measured by the decrease in % CCR such that the product could be fed directly to a cat cracker. Among the adsorbents used include silica, calcined at 600°C. It has a surface area of 300 m2/g and a reported pore diameter of 150 A. Another is amorphous silica-alumina (87 wt% silica), whose surface area and pore diameter are 318 m2/g and 105 A respectively.
Table 1
ARABIAN LIGHT ATMOSPHERIC RESID (ALAR) MADE INTO ACCEPTABLE CAT
CRACKER FEED STOCK BY ADSORPTION
% TOLUENE % Ppm ppm ppm SOLUBLES CCR VANADIUM NICKEL IRON
100 9.0 39 11 7
A. L. 650+°F
7% C5 INSOL. 56.0 93% C5 SOL. - 5.9
SILICA (G-62) 93.5 6.4 15 5.8 0 PRODUCT
Si/AI (MS-13) 90.0 4.2 2 4.8 0 PRODUCT
Figure imgf000008_0001
Example 1 - General Procedure
A mixture of one part by weight oil, 4 parts by weight solvent, and 1 part by weight adsorbent were combined and allowed to stir for 16 hours. The adsorbent was separated by filtering through a medium porosity buchner funnel. The solvent was removed from the filtrate by roto-evaporation. The resulting oil was analyzed for %CCR and metals. The recovered adsorbent was treated with a 25% ethanol in toluene at reflux in a Soxhlet extractor, until no further color was released. The solvent was removed by roto-evaporation, and the residue analyzed for metals and CCR.
Example 2
In a 250 ml round bottom flask, 7.0 g of Arabian Light Atmospheric residuum was combined with 28 ml of toluene. The mixture was stirred for 2 hours, and 7.0 g of silica, Grade G-62 from Grace-Davison, previously calcined at 600°C, was added, and the mixture stirred for 16 hours at room temperature. The mixture was filtered through a course filter funnel, the toluene evaporated and the recovered oil (6.58 g; representing 94% of the starting oil) was sent for metals and CCR analyses. Analyses are shown in Table 1.
Example 3
In a 250 ml round bottom flask, 6.88 g of Arabian Light Atmospheric residuum was combined with 28 ml of toluene. The mixture was stirred for 2 hours, and 6.88 g of a silica-alumina material, designated MS--13 (containing 13% alumina) from Grace-Davison, previously calcined at 600°C, was added, and the mixture stirred for 16 hours at room temperature. The mixture was filtered through a course filter funnel, the toluene evaporated and the rcovered oil (6.19 g; representing 90% of the starting oil) was sent for metals and CCR analyses. Analyses of the recovered oil are shown in Table 1.
Example 4
This example illustrates adsorbent regeneration by heating. The filtered solid from Example 3 was heated to 490°C for 2h under flowing nitrogen, cooled to room temperature and the adsorption experiment described above repeated using this solid. The recovered oil (90% of starting oil) had a CCR of 4.8% and contained 4.0 ppm V and 3.0 ppm Ni.
Example 5
In a 250 ml round bottom flask, 7.5 g of Arabian Light Atmospheric residuum was combined with 30 ml of cyclohexane. The mixture was stirred for 2 hours, and 7.5 g of silica, Grade G-62 from Grace-Davison, was filtered through a course filter funnel, the cyclohexane evaporated and the recovered oil (6.21 g; representing 83% of the starting oil) The treated oil had a CCR of 3.0% and contained <lppm V and 2 ppm Ni.
Example 6
In a 250 ml round bottom flask, 7.0 g of Arabian Light Atmospheric residuum was combined with 30 ml of cyclohexane. The mixture was stirred for 2 hours, and 7.0 g of a silica-alumina material designated MS-13 (containing 13% alumina) from Grace-Davison, previously calcined at 600°C, was added, and the mixture stirred for 16 hours at room temperature. The mixture was filtered through glass wool, the filter cake washed with about 200 ml cyclohexane, the cyclohexane was evaporated and the recovered oil (5.34 g; representing 76.3% of the starting oil). The treated oil had a CCR of 2.7% and contained 2 ppm V and 2 ppm Ni.
Example 7
In a 250 ml round bottom flask, 7.0 g of Arabian Light Atmospheric residuum was combined with 28 ml of toluene. The mixture was stirred for 2 hours, and 7.0 g of Norit activated carbon was added, and the mixture stirred for 16 hours at room temperature. The mixture was filtered through a course filter funnel, the toluene evaporated and the recovered oil (85% of the starting oil) was shown to contain lppm V and 4 ppm Ni. The CCR decreased to 2.7 from 9.0%.
Example 8
This example illustrates adsorbent regeneration by heating. The filtered solid from Example 7 was heated to 490 °C for 2h under flowing nitrogen, cooled to room temperature and the adsorption experiment described above repeated using this solid. The recovered oil (89% of starting oil) had a CCR of 3.9% and contained 3.0 ppm V and 2.0 ppm Ni.
Example 9
The example illustrates the process without use of a solvent. In a 200 ml round bottom flask, 60.0 g of Arabian Light Atmospheric residuum was heated to 200 °C with stirring and 30 g of a silica-alumina material designated MS-13 (containing 13% alumina), previously calcined at 600°C, was added. The mixture was stiπed for 16 hours at 200 °C. The oil was decanted from the solids and analyzed. The treated oil had a CCR of 4.7% and contained 1 ppm V and 1 ppm Ni.
Example 10
A fresh sample of 7.4 g of Heavy Arab Vacuum Resid (975°F+) containing a % CCR of 22.1%, 55 ppm Ni, and 190 ppm V was mixed with 30 ml o-xylene and heated to 100°C at which time 12 g of calcined (600°C) silica was added. The mixture was brought to 140°C and refluxed for 6 hours. The solvent was then removed by roto-evaporation and 100 ml pentane was added to the flask and stined for 16 hours at 25°C. The mixture was then filtered and the pentane removed by roto-evaporation to recover the pentane soluble oil (64.4%). The DAO had a % CCR of 5.01% and contained 3 ppm Ni and <1 ppm V. The pentane insoluble oil (35.6%) was removed from the adsorbent with a 25% methanol/75% toluene mixture.
II. Effluent from solvent deasphalter (SDA)
SDA also provides a feedstream for the present process. Solvent deasphalting (SDA) is another way of separating metals and coke precursors from residua. There is a trade-off between the yield and the levels of "impurities" remaining in the deasphaltened oil (DAO). The higher the yield of DAO, the higher the impurity levels. The yield and cleanliness of DAO defined the economic limit of how much deasphalting can be done. For example, using n-pentane approximately 75% yield of DAO can be obtained from a Baytown vacuum residuum. However, this DAO contains about 11% Conradson carbon and about 70 ppm of metals. This DAO woud not be suitable as a cat cracker feed stock, and were it to be fed to a cat cracker, it could only be done in very small amounts to avoid catalyst poisoning and too much coke make. Alternately, by using propane or butane in SDA, a good quality cat cracker feed stock can be obtained but in yields between 35-50%. This has the effect of limiting the amount of resid cat cracking possible by using SDA. The present process provides a simple way to clean up the DAO after SDA, or the feed to SDA, or to isolate the impurities during SDA, which would remove the bottleneck and allow the use of SDA to produce high yields of DAO as cat cracker feed stock, leading to more resid conversion.
The effluent from SDA, composed of a DAO in about 4-6 volumes of pentane, at about 120-160°C is passed into a vessel containing the adsorbent. After contacting for an appropriate time, the reactor effluent is transferred to another vessel labeled "CSR" where the pentane is removed and recycled to the SDA process, while the product, now an acceptable cat cracker feed (<4 ppm metals and <4 wt% coke precursors) is sent to a cat cracker to be fed directly or blended with conventional VGO (see Figure 1).
The adsorbents used include silica, calcined at 600°C. It had a surface area of 300 m2/g and a reported pore diameterof 150 A. Another is amoiphous silica-alumina (87 wt% silica), whose surface area and average pore diameter were determined to be 318 m /g and 105 A respectively. Data for calcined silica are shown in the attached Table 2, along with a non-limiting experimental protocol. In this protocol, a DAO was combined with a solvent (ratio of 4 parts solvent: 1 DAO), heated to temperature, and the adsorbent added at a treat rate of 2: 1 adsorbent to feed oil. The mixture was held at temperature for 6 hours, and cooled to room temperature. The solvent was removed on a rotary evaporator, then 10 volumes of pentane were added, and the mixture stirred overnight. Following filtration, the pentane was removed on a rotary evaporator yielding a clean DAO. The pentane insoluble material was treated first with toluene, then a 1: 1 (by volume) toluene:methanol mixture. Data in the table show that, compared to starting DAO, the product oils tieated in the presence of paraffinic or aromatic solvent contained veiy low levels of metals and showed a significant reduction of coke precursors as measured by the decrease in % CCR (Conradson Carbon Residue).
Table 2
roto. evap. C5
EXPERIMENT: DAO + SOLVENT + SILICA 14° °C Filter •
6 hr 95 oC 25 oc
SOLVENT:SILICA:DAO = 4:2:1
% C5 % ppm Ppm % % %
SOLVENT TEMP. °C SOLUBLES MCR N] C H N S H/C
None — 100 10.75 20.3 49.9 84.53 11.19 0.31 3.95 1.58
XYLENE 140 77 4.5 0.8 0.5 85.18 11.62 0.16 2.92 1.64
NONANE 140 72 5.0 1.0 0.5 84.88 11.75 0.15 3.09 1.66
HEPTANE 100 70 5.0 <1.0 0.3 84.99 11.83 0.00 3.19 1.67
Example 11 - General Procedure
A wt% mixture of one part oil, 4 parts solvent and 2 parts adsorbent were refluxed at 140°C for 6 hours. The solvent was removed by roto- evaporation. Pentane was added in a ratio of 10: 1 (solvent to oil) and the mixture was stined for 16 hours. The pentane soluble oil was separated by filtering through a medium porosity buchner funnel. The pentane was removed from the filtrate by roto-evaporation. The resulting oil was analyzed for % CCR and metals. The pentane insoluble portion of the oil was removed from the adsorbent by treating with a more polar solvent or solvent mixture in a ratio of 10: 1 (solven oil). The mixture was filtered and the pentane insoluble oil was recovered after roto-evaporation of the solvents. Analyses of the resulting oils are shown in Table 2.
Example 12
A mixture of one part (7 g) Baytown DAO (11% CCR, 50 ppm V, 20 ppm Ni) and 4 parts (28 g) o-xylene was heated to 100°C at which time 2 parts (12 g) silica (previously calcined at 600°C) was added. The mixture was brought to 140°C and refluxed for 6 hours. The solvent was removed by roto- evaporation and pentane was added in a ratio of 10: 1 (solvent to oil) and allowed to stir at 25°C overnight. The mixture was filtered and the pentane was removed by roto-evaporation to recover the pentane soluble fraction (77%). The resulting oil had a >50% reduction in % CCR and was virtually metal free (see Table 2).
The pentane insoluble oil was removed from the silica by stirring overnight at 25°C in a mixture of 25% methanol/75% toluene and filtering to recover the pentane insoluble oil (23%) and regenerated adsorbent. Example 13
This example illustrates that regenerated inorganic adsorbents can be effectively used. A fresh sample of one part (7 g) Baytown DAO and 4 parts (28 g) o-xylene were heated to 100°C at which time 2 parts (11.8) of the regenerated but not re-calcined silica from Example 12 was added. The mixture was brought to 140°C and refluxed for 6 hours. The workup was as described in Example 12. The resulting oil (80%) had a % CCR of 4.7% and contained <1.5 ppm Ni and <0.33 ppm V.
Example 14
A fresh sample of one part Baytown DAO (see Example 12) and 4 parts nonane were heated to 100°C at which time 2 parts silica (Example 12) was added. The mixture was brought to 140°C and refluxed for 6 hours. The workup was as described in Example 12. The resulting oil had a reduced % CCR and was virtually metal free (see Table 2).
Example 15
A fresh sample of one part Baytown DAO (see Example 12) and 4 parts heptane were heated to 100°C at which time 2 parts silica (Example 12) was added. The mixture was refluxed at 100°C for 6 hours. The workup was as described in Example 12. The resulting oil had a reduced % CCR and was virtually metal free (see Table 2). Example 16
In this example another experimental protocol is illustrated. In this procedure, the deasphalting and adsorption are combined into one step. A fresh sample of one part Baytown DAO (see Example 12) and 10 parts pentane was stirred at 25°C for 30 minutes. At this time 2 parts of silica (calcined at 600°C) were added with continued stirring. The mixture was stirred for an additional 16 hours. The pentane soluble oil was then recovered by filtration as in Example 12. The resulting oil (70%) had a % CCR of 5.1% and contained <2 ppm Ni and <.75 ppm V.
Example 17
A fresh sample of one part Baytown DAO (see Example 12) and 10 parts pentane was stirred at 25°C for 30 minutes. At this time 2 parts of calcined (600°) silica (87%)/alumina (13%) was added with continued stirring. The mixture was stined for an additional 16 hours. The pentane soluble oil was then recovered by filtration as in Example 12. The resulting oil (58%) had a % CCR of 3.63% and contained <3 ppm Ni and <0.2 ppm V.
Example 18
A fresh sample of one part Baytown DAO (see Example 12) and 4 parts o-xylene were heated to 100°C at which time 2 parts of an uncalcined silica (87%)/alumina (13%) mixture was added. The mixture was brought to 140°C and refluxed for 6 hours. The workup was described in Example 12. The resulting oil (69%) had a % CCR of 3.19% and contained <3.0ppm Ni and <0.5 ppm V. Example 19
A fresh sample of one part Baytown DAO (see Example 12) and 4 parts toluene was prepared at which time 1 part of Norit activated carbon was added. The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 16 h. The workup was described in Example 12. The resulting oil (85%) had a % CCR of 6.5% and contained 1.0 ppm Ni and 7 ppm V.

Claims

CLAIMS:
1. A process to remove a major portion of metals and coke precursors from a hydrocarbon or heteroatom-containing hydrocarbon stream essentially consisting of
(a) contacting said feedstream with a hydrocarbon insoluble adsorbent characterized by a surface area > 100 m /g for a time and temperature sufficient to adsorb a major portion of said metals and coke precursors onto said adsorbent,
(b) recovering the oil which does not adsorb and
(c) removing the metals and coke presursors from said adsorbent.
2. The process of claim 1 wherein said removing step is carried out by contacting said adsorbent with a solvent capable of dissolving polar hydrocarbons.
3. The process of claim 1 wherein said adsorbent is selected from the group consisting of silica, silica-alumina, acid tieated clays and activated carbons.
4. The process of claim 1 wherein the hydrocarbon feedstream is an atmospheric residuum.
5. The process of claim 1 wherein said hydrocarbon feedstream is a vacuum resid.
6. The process of claim 1 wherein said hydrocarbon feedstream is effluent from solvent deasphalter.
7. The process of claim 1 wherein said removing step is carried out by contacting said adsorbent with heat.
8. The process of claim 1 wherein said feedstream to adsorbent ratio is between OJ and 10 wt/wt..
9. The process of claim 1 wherein said feedstream is feed through a fixed bed of adsorbent.
10. The process of claim 9 further comprising the step of terminating the feedstieam and regenerating said adsorbent by passing a solvent through said adsorber.
PCT/US1998/026608 1997-12-16 1998-12-15 Selective adsorption process for resid upgrading WO1999031199A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP98963928A EP1062296A4 (en) 1997-12-16 1998-12-15 Selective adsorption process for resid upgrading
CA002313217A CA2313217A1 (en) 1997-12-16 1998-12-15 Selective adsorption process for resid upgrading

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US99127997A 1997-12-16 1997-12-16
US08/991,279 1997-12-16

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO1999031199A1 true WO1999031199A1 (en) 1999-06-24

Family

ID=25537055

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US1998/026608 WO1999031199A1 (en) 1997-12-16 1998-12-15 Selective adsorption process for resid upgrading

Country Status (3)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1062296A4 (en)
CA (1) CA2313217A1 (en)
WO (1) WO1999031199A1 (en)

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2011849A1 (en) * 2007-06-12 2009-01-07 General Electric Company Methods and systems for removing metals from low grade fuel
US20140110343A1 (en) * 2012-10-22 2014-04-24 Florida State University Research Foundation, Inc. Isolation of interfacial material from organic matrices
US20150192501A1 (en) * 2012-10-22 2015-07-09 Florida State University Research Foundation, Inc. Immobilized water stationary phase
US20190161688A1 (en) * 2014-12-18 2019-05-30 Phillips 66 Company Solid adsorption process for removing particles from heavy, partially refined oils
WO2021211690A1 (en) * 2020-04-17 2021-10-21 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Process for producing deasphalted and demetallized oil
CN113736509A (en) * 2020-05-28 2021-12-03 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Method for treating hydrogenated residual oil in residual oil slurry bed

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2987470A (en) * 1958-11-13 1961-06-06 Hydrocarbon Research Inc Demineralization of oils
US3964995A (en) * 1972-07-24 1976-06-22 Hydrocarbon Research, Inc. Hydrodesulfurization process
US4192736A (en) * 1978-11-29 1980-03-11 Chevron Research Company Removal of indigenous metal impurities from an oil with phosphorus oxide-promoted alumina
US4486298A (en) * 1981-05-28 1984-12-04 Mobil Oil Corporation Adsorptive demetalation of heavy petroleum residua
US4915820A (en) * 1985-02-08 1990-04-10 Ashland Oil, Inc. Removal of coke and metals from carbo-metallic oils

Family Cites Families (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3839187A (en) * 1971-05-17 1974-10-01 Sun Oil Co Removing metal contaminants from petroleum residual oil
US4116820A (en) * 1977-06-29 1978-09-26 Shell Oil Company Process for demetallizing of heavy hydrocarbons
US4243514A (en) * 1979-05-14 1981-01-06 Engelhard Minerals & Chemicals Corporation Preparation of FCC charge from residual fractions
EP0175799B1 (en) * 1983-06-20 1990-08-16 Ashland Oil, Inc. Immobilization of vanadia deposited on sorbent materials during visbreaking treatment of carbo-metallic oils
US4414098A (en) * 1981-07-30 1983-11-08 Ashland Oil, Inc. Upgrading carbo-metallic oils with used catalyst
US4412914A (en) * 1981-08-10 1983-11-01 Ashland Oil, Inc. Endothermic removal of coke deposited on sorbent materials during carbo-metallic oil conversion
US4719003A (en) * 1984-06-18 1988-01-12 Mobil Oil Corporation Process for restoring activity of dewaxing catalysts
US6245223B1 (en) * 1997-12-16 2001-06-12 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Selective adsorption process for resid upgrading (law815)

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2987470A (en) * 1958-11-13 1961-06-06 Hydrocarbon Research Inc Demineralization of oils
US3964995A (en) * 1972-07-24 1976-06-22 Hydrocarbon Research, Inc. Hydrodesulfurization process
US4192736A (en) * 1978-11-29 1980-03-11 Chevron Research Company Removal of indigenous metal impurities from an oil with phosphorus oxide-promoted alumina
US4486298A (en) * 1981-05-28 1984-12-04 Mobil Oil Corporation Adsorptive demetalation of heavy petroleum residua
US4915820A (en) * 1985-02-08 1990-04-10 Ashland Oil, Inc. Removal of coke and metals from carbo-metallic oils

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See also references of EP1062296A4 *

Cited By (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2011849A1 (en) * 2007-06-12 2009-01-07 General Electric Company Methods and systems for removing metals from low grade fuel
US7947167B2 (en) 2007-06-12 2011-05-24 General Electric Company Methods and systems for removing metals from low grade fuel
US20140110343A1 (en) * 2012-10-22 2014-04-24 Florida State University Research Foundation, Inc. Isolation of interfacial material from organic matrices
US20150192501A1 (en) * 2012-10-22 2015-07-09 Florida State University Research Foundation, Inc. Immobilized water stationary phase
US10315131B2 (en) * 2012-10-22 2019-06-11 Florida State University Research Foundation, Inc. Isolation of interfacial material from organic matrices
US20190161688A1 (en) * 2014-12-18 2019-05-30 Phillips 66 Company Solid adsorption process for removing particles from heavy, partially refined oils
WO2021211690A1 (en) * 2020-04-17 2021-10-21 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Process for producing deasphalted and demetallized oil
CN113736509A (en) * 2020-05-28 2021-12-03 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Method for treating hydrogenated residual oil in residual oil slurry bed
CN113736509B (en) * 2020-05-28 2023-06-09 中国石油化工股份有限公司 A treatment method for residual oil in slurry bed hydrogenation

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CA2313217A1 (en) 1999-06-24
EP1062296A1 (en) 2000-12-27
EP1062296A4 (en) 2003-01-22

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6245223B1 (en) Selective adsorption process for resid upgrading (law815)
CA2667240C (en) Enhanced solvent deasphalting process for heavy hydrocarbon feedstocks utilizing solid adsorbent
US20090156876A1 (en) Apparatus and Process for Cracking Hydrocarbonaceous Feed Treated to Adsorb Paraffin-Insoluble Compounds
US8246814B2 (en) Process for upgrading hydrocarbon feedstocks using solid adsorbent and membrane separation of treated product stream
JP6818737B2 (en) Integrated and improved solvent de-depletion and caulking process for producing petroleum raw coke
EP2225349B1 (en) Process and apparatus for upgrading whole crude oil to remove nitrogen and sulfur compounds
US20090145807A1 (en) Process to produce low sulfur catalytically cracked gasoline without saturation of olefinic compounds
US9321971B2 (en) Removal of asphaltene contaminants from hydrocarbon streams using carbon based adsorbents
WO2012033778A1 (en) Process for oxidative desulfurization and denitrogenation using oxidation, followed by solvent extraction and a fluid catalytic cracking (fcc) process
WO2013019335A1 (en) Delayed coking process utilizing adsorbent materials
US3779895A (en) Treatment of heavy petroleum oils
EP1062296A1 (en) Selective adsorption process for resid upgrading
EP0072873A1 (en) Refining process for producing increased yield of distillation from heavy petroleum feedstocks
JP2020510719A (en) Oxidative desulfurization and sulfone treatment of petroleum fractions using FCC
US2906694A (en) Integrated hydrofining process
JP2002542375A (en) Improved de-historying of residual oils by reaction recycle of high-boiling substances.
WO2015002868A1 (en) Separation of selected asphaltenes from a hydrocarbon-containing feedstock
EP3551731A1 (en) Oxidative desulfurization of oil fractions and sulfone management using an fcc
JPS5869290A (en) Manufacture of gasoline using hydrocarbon oil
US5160603A (en) Catalytic cracking with sulfur compound added to the feed
GB2314340A (en) Treatment of FCC pre-feeds with metal alkoxides
WO2021118612A1 (en) Needle coke production from hpna recovered from hydrocracking unit
JPS5935955B2 (en) Hydrogenation method for deasphalting residue

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): CA SG

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE

DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2313217

Country of ref document: CA

Ref country code: CA

Ref document number: 2313217

Kind code of ref document: A

Format of ref document f/p: F

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 1998963928

Country of ref document: EP

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 1998963928

Country of ref document: EP

WWW Wipo information: withdrawn in national office

Ref document number: 1998963928

Country of ref document: EP

点击 这是indexloc提供的php浏览器服务,不要输入任何密码和下载