WO1999031199A1 - Selective adsorption process for resid upgrading - Google Patents
Selective adsorption process for resid upgrading Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO1999031199A1 WO1999031199A1 PCT/US1998/026608 US9826608W WO9931199A1 WO 1999031199 A1 WO1999031199 A1 WO 1999031199A1 US 9826608 W US9826608 W US 9826608W WO 9931199 A1 WO9931199 A1 WO 9931199A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- adsorbent
- oil
- solvent
- metals
- feedstream
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C10—PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
- C10G—CRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
- C10G25/00—Refining of hydrocarbon oils in the absence of hydrogen, with solid sorbents
- C10G25/003—Specific sorbent material, not covered by C10G25/02 or C10G25/03
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C10—PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
- C10G—CRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
- C10G25/00—Refining of hydrocarbon oils in the absence of hydrogen, with solid sorbents
Definitions
- the present invention relates to the refining of hydrocarbon feedstocks. More particularly, this invention concerns the segregation and removal of coke precursors and metals from atmospheric and vacuum residua, and deasphaltened vacuum residua.
- Hydrocarbon feedstocks are composed of hydrocarbons and heteroatom containing hydrocarbons which differ in boiling point, molecular weight and chemical structure.
- High boiling, high molecular weight heteroatom-containing hydrocarbons weight e.g. asphaltenes
- coke precursors metals and carbon forming constituents
- lower boiling naphtha and distillate fractions because coke precursors form coke during thermal processing (such as is employed in a modem refinery), it is desirable to remove (or at least segregate) the heteroatom containing hydrocarbons containing the metals and coke precursors, thereby facilitating further processing of the more valuable fractions of the feedstock.
- the present invention is a process to remove a major portion of metals and coke precursors from a hydrocarbon or heteroatom- containing hydrocarbon feedstream.
- the feedstream is contacted with an adsorbent that adsorbs the metals and coke precursors.
- the feedstream effluent is transferred to another vessel.
- the metals and coke precursors are then removed from the adsorbent by a suitable solvent.
- Figure 1 shows a schematic diagram of the process of one embodiment of the present invention, illustrating how metals and coke precursors would be removed from deasphaltened oil (DAO), the product from a solvent deasphalter.
- DAO deasphaltened oil
- Figure 2 shows a schematic diagram of another embodiment of the present invention illustrating upgrading a residuum from either atmospheric or vacuum distillation.
- the present invention is an adsorption process to remove a significant amount of metals and coke precursors from a hydrocarbon feedstream, and to render that stream more valuable as a fuel or as feed to a catalytic cracker.
- Any hydrocarbonaceous liquid containing metals and coke precursors may be used for the feedstream of this invention.
- These may include atmospheric and vacuum residua, vacuum gas oils, solvent deasphalting (SDA) fractions with and without resins, and even whole crude oils, particularly those containing high levels of nickel and vanadium such as found in Venezuela tars for example. While any of these liquids may be used as a feedstock if the results are economically justified, particularly useful feedstreams for this invention are atmospheric and vacuum residua.
- the effluent from the feedstieam will then provide a clean cat cracker feed.
- the adsorption process uses a hydrocarbon insoluble adsorbent material, which has a high capacity for adsorbing metals and coke precursors, and which can be easily regenerated by washing with relatively polar solvents or solvent mixtures, or by other processes including those with pyrolysis or combustion steps.
- FIG. 1 shows a schematic diagram of one embodiment of the process of the present invention aimed at upgrading a solvent deasphalted heavy oil.
- the effluent from a solvent deasphalter (SDA), composed of a deasphaltened oil (DAO) in about 4-6 volumes of deasphalting solvent, such as pentane at about 120-160°C is passed into a vessel containing the adsorbent.
- the adsorbent may be a fixed bed.
- the reactor effluent is transferred to another vessel labeled "CSR", where the deasphalting solvent (e.g., pentane) is removed and recycled to the SDA, while the product, an upgraded deasphaltened oil, is an acceptable cat cracker feed ( ⁇ about 4 ppm metals and ⁇ about 4 wt% coke precursors).
- the upgraded deasphaltened oil is sent to a cat cracker to be fed directly or blended with conventional vacuum gas oil (VGO).
- VGO vacuum gas oil
- the swing reactor configuration in Figure 1 is set up such that one vessel is set up for adsorption, while the other is set up for adsorbent regeneration.
- regeneration is carried out by using solvents such as toluene, toluene-methanol, or other appropriate solvents available in a refinery environment.
- solvents such as toluene, toluene-methanol, or other appropriate solvents available in a refinery environment.
- the metal containing and coke precursor molecules are washed off the adsorbent, the solution containing these impurities is stripped in the box labeled "SEP'N", the solvent recycled and the impurities stream sent to a coker, partial oxidation unit or other disposal technique.
- FIG. 2 shows a schematic diagram of a second embodiment of the process of the present invention aimed at upgrading a residuum from either atmospheric or vacuum distillation.
- the residuum is passed into a vessel containing the adsorbent. After contacting the adsorbent for an appropriate time, the effluent is an upgraded residuum with lowered metals and coke precursor content.
- the upgraded residuum flows on to further refining processing, such as cat cracking, where it is treated either directly or blended with other refinery streams, such as conventional vacuum gas oil (VGO).
- VGO vacuum gas oil
- the swing reactor configuration in Figure 2 is set up such that one vessel is set up for adsorption, while the other vessel is set up for adsorbent regeneration.
- regeneration is carried out by using solvents such as toluene, toluene- methanol, or other appropriate solvents available in a refinery environment.
- solvents such as toluene, toluene- methanol, or other appropriate solvents available in a refinery environment.
- the metal containing and coke precursor molecules are washed off the adsorbent, the solution containing these impurities is stripped in the box labeled "SEP'N", the solvent is recycled and the impurities stream sent to a coker, partial oxidation unit or other disposal technique.
- Suitable adsorbents for the present process include hydrocarbon insoluble inorganic and carbonaceous materials, which have surface areas greater than 100 m 2 /g and whose surfaces may be acidic.
- Specific examples of adsorbents useful for this process include silica, silica-alumina, K-10 and similar acid-treated clays and activated carbons, with surface areas ⁇ 1000 m 2 /g.
- a preferred feedstieam to adsorbent ratio is between 0J and 10 wt/wt.
- the present invention shall be illustrated by examples using feedstreams of Arabian Light atmospheric residuum, effluent from solvent deasphalters and various acceptable adsorbents and process solvents.
- ALAR is one example of a feedstieam suitable for the present process.
- ALAR Arabian Light atmospheric residuum
- solvent and adsorbent ratio of 4 solvent: 1 adsorbent: 1 oil
- Solvents were used in the room temperature experiments in order to keep the viscosity within a workable range.
- elevated temperatures e.g. 200 °C
- solvents are not necessary for the contacting of oil with adsorbent.
- the solvent was removed on a rotary evaporator yielding a clean oil.
- the adsorbed material was treated first with toluene, then a 1: 1 (by volume) toluene :methanol mixture to desorb it from the adsorbent.
- Data in Table 1 show that, compared to starting ALAR, the product oils treated by the method of this invention contained very low levels of metals and showed a significant enough reduction of coke precursors as measured by the decrease in % CCR such that the product could be fed directly to a cat cracker.
- the adsorbents used include silica, calcined at 600°C. It has a surface area of 300 m 2 /g and a reported pore diameter of 150 A. Another is amorphous silica-alumina (87 wt% silica), whose surface area and pore diameter are 318 m 2 /g and 105 A respectively.
- a mixture of one part by weight oil, 4 parts by weight solvent, and 1 part by weight adsorbent were combined and allowed to stir for 16 hours.
- the adsorbent was separated by filtering through a medium porosity buchner funnel.
- the solvent was removed from the filtrate by roto-evaporation.
- the resulting oil was analyzed for %CCR and metals.
- the recovered adsorbent was treated with a 25% ethanol in toluene at reflux in a Soxhlet extractor, until no further color was released.
- the solvent was removed by roto-evaporation, and the residue analyzed for metals and CCR.
- This example illustrates adsorbent regeneration by heating.
- the filtered solid from Example 3 was heated to 490°C for 2h under flowing nitrogen, cooled to room temperature and the adsorption experiment described above repeated using this solid.
- the recovered oil (90% of starting oil) had a CCR of 4.8% and contained 4.0 ppm V and 3.0 ppm Ni.
- This example illustrates adsorbent regeneration by heating.
- the filtered solid from Example 7 was heated to 490 °C for 2h under flowing nitrogen, cooled to room temperature and the adsorption experiment described above repeated using this solid.
- the recovered oil (89% of starting oil) had a CCR of 3.9% and contained 3.0 ppm V and 2.0 ppm Ni.
- the example illustrates the process without use of a solvent.
- 60.0 g of Arabian Light Atmospheric residuum was heated to 200 °C with stirring and 30 g of a silica-alumina material designated MS-13 (containing 13% alumina), previously calcined at 600°C, was added.
- MS-13 silica-alumina material
- the mixture was sti ⁇ ed for 16 hours at 200 °C.
- the oil was decanted from the solids and analyzed.
- the treated oil had a CCR of 4.7% and contained 1 ppm V and 1 ppm Ni.
- a fresh sample of 7.4 g of Heavy Arab Vacuum Resid (975°F+) containing a % CCR of 22.1%, 55 ppm Ni, and 190 ppm V was mixed with 30 ml o-xylene and heated to 100°C at which time 12 g of calcined (600°C) silica was added. The mixture was brought to 140°C and refluxed for 6 hours. The solvent was then removed by roto-evaporation and 100 ml pentane was added to the flask and stined for 16 hours at 25°C. The mixture was then filtered and the pentane removed by roto-evaporation to recover the pentane soluble oil (64.4%).
- the DAO had a % CCR of 5.01% and contained 3 ppm Ni and ⁇ 1 ppm V.
- the pentane insoluble oil (35.6%) was removed from the adsorbent with a 25% methanol/75% toluene mixture.
- SDA also provides a feedstream for the present process.
- Solvent deasphalting is another way of separating metals and coke precursors from residua.
- DAO deasphaltened oil
- the yield and cleanliness of DAO defined the economic limit of how much deasphalting can be done. For example, using n-pentane approximately 75% yield of DAO can be obtained from a Baytown vacuum residuum. However, this DAO contains about 11% Conradson carbon and about 70 ppm of metals.
- propane or butane in SDA a good quality cat cracker feed stock can be obtained but in yields between 35-50%. This has the effect of limiting the amount of resid cat cracking possible by using SDA.
- the present process provides a simple way to clean up the DAO after SDA, or the feed to SDA, or to isolate the impurities during SDA, which would remove the bottleneck and allow the use of SDA to produce high yields of DAO as cat cracker feed stock, leading to more resid conversion.
- the effluent from SDA composed of a DAO in about 4-6 volumes of pentane, at about 120-160°C is passed into a vessel containing the adsorbent. After contacting for an appropriate time, the reactor effluent is transferred to another vessel labeled "CSR" where the pentane is removed and recycled to the SDA process, while the product, now an acceptable cat cracker feed ( ⁇ 4 ppm metals and ⁇ 4 wt% coke precursors) is sent to a cat cracker to be fed directly or blended with conventional VGO (see Figure 1).
- the adsorbents used include silica, calcined at 600°C. It had a surface area of 300 m 2 /g and a reported pore diameterof 150 A. Another is amoiphous silica-alumina (87 wt% silica), whose surface area and average pore diameter were determined to be 318 m /g and 105 A respectively. Data for calcined silica are shown in the attached Table 2, along with a non-limiting experimental protocol. In this protocol, a DAO was combined with a solvent (ratio of 4 parts solvent: 1 DAO), heated to temperature, and the adsorbent added at a treat rate of 2: 1 adsorbent to feed oil.
- NONANE 140 72 5.0 1.0 0.5 84.88 11.75 0.15 3.09 1.66
- a wt% mixture of one part oil, 4 parts solvent and 2 parts adsorbent were refluxed at 140°C for 6 hours.
- the solvent was removed by roto- evaporation.
- Pentane was added in a ratio of 10: 1 (solvent to oil) and the mixture was stined for 16 hours.
- the pentane soluble oil was separated by filtering through a medium porosity buchner funnel.
- the pentane was removed from the filtrate by roto-evaporation.
- the resulting oil was analyzed for % CCR and metals.
- the pentane insoluble portion of the oil was removed from the adsorbent by treating with a more polar solvent or solvent mixture in a ratio of 10: 1 (solven oil).
- the pentane insoluble oil was removed from the silica by stirring overnight at 25°C in a mixture of 25% methanol/75% toluene and filtering to recover the pentane insoluble oil (23%) and regenerated adsorbent.
- Example 12 A fresh sample of one part Baytown DAO (see Example 12) and 4 parts nonane were heated to 100°C at which time 2 parts silica (Example 12) was added. The mixture was brought to 140°C and refluxed for 6 hours. The workup was as described in Example 12. The resulting oil had a reduced % CCR and was virtually metal free (see Table 2).
- Example 12 A fresh sample of one part Baytown DAO (see Example 12) and 4 parts heptane were heated to 100°C at which time 2 parts silica (Example 12) was added. The mixture was refluxed at 100°C for 6 hours. The workup was as described in Example 12. The resulting oil had a reduced % CCR and was virtually metal free (see Table 2).
- Example 16 A fresh sample of one part Baytown DAO (see Example 12) and 4 parts heptane were heated to 100°C at which time 2 parts silica (Example 12) was added. The mixture was refluxed at 100°C for 6 hours. The workup was as described in Example 12. The resulting oil had a reduced % CCR and was virtually metal free (see Table 2).
- Example 16 A fresh sample of one part Baytown DAO (see Example 12) and 4 parts heptane were heated to 100°C at which time 2 parts silica (Example 12) was added. The mixture was refluxed at 100°C for 6 hours. The work
- Example 12 A fresh sample of one part Baytown DAO (see Example 12) and 4 parts o-xylene were heated to 100°C at which time 2 parts of an uncalcined silica (87%)/alumina (13%) mixture was added. The mixture was brought to 140°C and refluxed for 6 hours. The workup was described in Example 12. The resulting oil (69%) had a % CCR of 3.19% and contained ⁇ 3.0ppm Ni and ⁇ 0.5 ppm V.
- Example 19 A fresh sample of one part Baytown DAO (see Example 12) and 4 parts o-xylene were heated to 100°C at which time 2 parts of an uncalcined silica (87%)/alumina (13%) mixture was added. The mixture was brought to 140°C and refluxed for 6 hours. The workup was described in Example 12. The resulting oil (69%) had a % CCR of 3.19% and contained ⁇ 3.0ppm Ni and ⁇ 0.5 ppm V.
- Example 19 A fresh sample of one part Baytown DAO
- Example 12 A fresh sample of one part Baytown DAO (see Example 12) and 4 parts toluene was prepared at which time 1 part of Norit activated carbon was added. The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 16 h. The workup was described in Example 12. The resulting oil (85%) had a % CCR of 6.5% and contained 1.0 ppm Ni and 7 ppm V.
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Production Of Liquid Hydrocarbon Mixture For Refining Petroleum (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP98963928A EP1062296A4 (en) | 1997-12-16 | 1998-12-15 | Selective adsorption process for resid upgrading |
CA002313217A CA2313217A1 (en) | 1997-12-16 | 1998-12-15 | Selective adsorption process for resid upgrading |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US99127997A | 1997-12-16 | 1997-12-16 | |
US08/991,279 | 1997-12-16 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO1999031199A1 true WO1999031199A1 (en) | 1999-06-24 |
Family
ID=25537055
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US1998/026608 WO1999031199A1 (en) | 1997-12-16 | 1998-12-15 | Selective adsorption process for resid upgrading |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP1062296A4 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2313217A1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO1999031199A1 (en) |
Cited By (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP2011849A1 (en) * | 2007-06-12 | 2009-01-07 | General Electric Company | Methods and systems for removing metals from low grade fuel |
US20140110343A1 (en) * | 2012-10-22 | 2014-04-24 | Florida State University Research Foundation, Inc. | Isolation of interfacial material from organic matrices |
US20150192501A1 (en) * | 2012-10-22 | 2015-07-09 | Florida State University Research Foundation, Inc. | Immobilized water stationary phase |
US20190161688A1 (en) * | 2014-12-18 | 2019-05-30 | Phillips 66 Company | Solid adsorption process for removing particles from heavy, partially refined oils |
WO2021211690A1 (en) * | 2020-04-17 | 2021-10-21 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Process for producing deasphalted and demetallized oil |
CN113736509A (en) * | 2020-05-28 | 2021-12-03 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Method for treating hydrogenated residual oil in residual oil slurry bed |
Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2987470A (en) * | 1958-11-13 | 1961-06-06 | Hydrocarbon Research Inc | Demineralization of oils |
US3964995A (en) * | 1972-07-24 | 1976-06-22 | Hydrocarbon Research, Inc. | Hydrodesulfurization process |
US4192736A (en) * | 1978-11-29 | 1980-03-11 | Chevron Research Company | Removal of indigenous metal impurities from an oil with phosphorus oxide-promoted alumina |
US4486298A (en) * | 1981-05-28 | 1984-12-04 | Mobil Oil Corporation | Adsorptive demetalation of heavy petroleum residua |
US4915820A (en) * | 1985-02-08 | 1990-04-10 | Ashland Oil, Inc. | Removal of coke and metals from carbo-metallic oils |
Family Cites Families (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3839187A (en) * | 1971-05-17 | 1974-10-01 | Sun Oil Co | Removing metal contaminants from petroleum residual oil |
US4116820A (en) * | 1977-06-29 | 1978-09-26 | Shell Oil Company | Process for demetallizing of heavy hydrocarbons |
US4243514A (en) * | 1979-05-14 | 1981-01-06 | Engelhard Minerals & Chemicals Corporation | Preparation of FCC charge from residual fractions |
EP0175799B1 (en) * | 1983-06-20 | 1990-08-16 | Ashland Oil, Inc. | Immobilization of vanadia deposited on sorbent materials during visbreaking treatment of carbo-metallic oils |
US4414098A (en) * | 1981-07-30 | 1983-11-08 | Ashland Oil, Inc. | Upgrading carbo-metallic oils with used catalyst |
US4412914A (en) * | 1981-08-10 | 1983-11-01 | Ashland Oil, Inc. | Endothermic removal of coke deposited on sorbent materials during carbo-metallic oil conversion |
US4719003A (en) * | 1984-06-18 | 1988-01-12 | Mobil Oil Corporation | Process for restoring activity of dewaxing catalysts |
US6245223B1 (en) * | 1997-12-16 | 2001-06-12 | Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company | Selective adsorption process for resid upgrading (law815) |
-
1998
- 1998-12-15 WO PCT/US1998/026608 patent/WO1999031199A1/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 1998-12-15 CA CA002313217A patent/CA2313217A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 1998-12-15 EP EP98963928A patent/EP1062296A4/en not_active Withdrawn
Patent Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2987470A (en) * | 1958-11-13 | 1961-06-06 | Hydrocarbon Research Inc | Demineralization of oils |
US3964995A (en) * | 1972-07-24 | 1976-06-22 | Hydrocarbon Research, Inc. | Hydrodesulfurization process |
US4192736A (en) * | 1978-11-29 | 1980-03-11 | Chevron Research Company | Removal of indigenous metal impurities from an oil with phosphorus oxide-promoted alumina |
US4486298A (en) * | 1981-05-28 | 1984-12-04 | Mobil Oil Corporation | Adsorptive demetalation of heavy petroleum residua |
US4915820A (en) * | 1985-02-08 | 1990-04-10 | Ashland Oil, Inc. | Removal of coke and metals from carbo-metallic oils |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
See also references of EP1062296A4 * |
Cited By (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP2011849A1 (en) * | 2007-06-12 | 2009-01-07 | General Electric Company | Methods and systems for removing metals from low grade fuel |
US7947167B2 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2011-05-24 | General Electric Company | Methods and systems for removing metals from low grade fuel |
US20140110343A1 (en) * | 2012-10-22 | 2014-04-24 | Florida State University Research Foundation, Inc. | Isolation of interfacial material from organic matrices |
US20150192501A1 (en) * | 2012-10-22 | 2015-07-09 | Florida State University Research Foundation, Inc. | Immobilized water stationary phase |
US10315131B2 (en) * | 2012-10-22 | 2019-06-11 | Florida State University Research Foundation, Inc. | Isolation of interfacial material from organic matrices |
US20190161688A1 (en) * | 2014-12-18 | 2019-05-30 | Phillips 66 Company | Solid adsorption process for removing particles from heavy, partially refined oils |
WO2021211690A1 (en) * | 2020-04-17 | 2021-10-21 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Process for producing deasphalted and demetallized oil |
CN113736509A (en) * | 2020-05-28 | 2021-12-03 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Method for treating hydrogenated residual oil in residual oil slurry bed |
CN113736509B (en) * | 2020-05-28 | 2023-06-09 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | A treatment method for residual oil in slurry bed hydrogenation |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CA2313217A1 (en) | 1999-06-24 |
EP1062296A1 (en) | 2000-12-27 |
EP1062296A4 (en) | 2003-01-22 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US6245223B1 (en) | Selective adsorption process for resid upgrading (law815) | |
CA2667240C (en) | Enhanced solvent deasphalting process for heavy hydrocarbon feedstocks utilizing solid adsorbent | |
US20090156876A1 (en) | Apparatus and Process for Cracking Hydrocarbonaceous Feed Treated to Adsorb Paraffin-Insoluble Compounds | |
US8246814B2 (en) | Process for upgrading hydrocarbon feedstocks using solid adsorbent and membrane separation of treated product stream | |
JP6818737B2 (en) | Integrated and improved solvent de-depletion and caulking process for producing petroleum raw coke | |
EP2225349B1 (en) | Process and apparatus for upgrading whole crude oil to remove nitrogen and sulfur compounds | |
US20090145807A1 (en) | Process to produce low sulfur catalytically cracked gasoline without saturation of olefinic compounds | |
US9321971B2 (en) | Removal of asphaltene contaminants from hydrocarbon streams using carbon based adsorbents | |
WO2012033778A1 (en) | Process for oxidative desulfurization and denitrogenation using oxidation, followed by solvent extraction and a fluid catalytic cracking (fcc) process | |
WO2013019335A1 (en) | Delayed coking process utilizing adsorbent materials | |
US3779895A (en) | Treatment of heavy petroleum oils | |
EP1062296A1 (en) | Selective adsorption process for resid upgrading | |
EP0072873A1 (en) | Refining process for producing increased yield of distillation from heavy petroleum feedstocks | |
JP2020510719A (en) | Oxidative desulfurization and sulfone treatment of petroleum fractions using FCC | |
US2906694A (en) | Integrated hydrofining process | |
JP2002542375A (en) | Improved de-historying of residual oils by reaction recycle of high-boiling substances. | |
WO2015002868A1 (en) | Separation of selected asphaltenes from a hydrocarbon-containing feedstock | |
EP3551731A1 (en) | Oxidative desulfurization of oil fractions and sulfone management using an fcc | |
JPS5869290A (en) | Manufacture of gasoline using hydrocarbon oil | |
US5160603A (en) | Catalytic cracking with sulfur compound added to the feed | |
GB2314340A (en) | Treatment of FCC pre-feeds with metal alkoxides | |
WO2021118612A1 (en) | Needle coke production from hpna recovered from hydrocracking unit | |
JPS5935955B2 (en) | Hydrogenation method for deasphalting residue |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AK | Designated states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): CA SG |
|
AL | Designated countries for regional patents |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE |
|
DFPE | Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101) | ||
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application | ||
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 2313217 Country of ref document: CA Ref country code: CA Ref document number: 2313217 Kind code of ref document: A Format of ref document f/p: F |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 1998963928 Country of ref document: EP |
|
WWP | Wipo information: published in national office |
Ref document number: 1998963928 Country of ref document: EP |
|
WWW | Wipo information: withdrawn in national office |
Ref document number: 1998963928 Country of ref document: EP |