+

WO1999030845A1 - Procede permettant d'eliminer les contaminants de surface de moules utilises sur des outils d'encapsulation de semiconducteurs - Google Patents

Procede permettant d'eliminer les contaminants de surface de moules utilises sur des outils d'encapsulation de semiconducteurs Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO1999030845A1
WO1999030845A1 PCT/SG1998/000058 SG9800058W WO9930845A1 WO 1999030845 A1 WO1999030845 A1 WO 1999030845A1 SG 9800058 W SG9800058 W SG 9800058W WO 9930845 A1 WO9930845 A1 WO 9930845A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
laser
mould
contaminants
recited
area
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/SG1998/000058
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Wendong Song
Yongfeng Lu
Qiong Chen
Huck Wee Tay
Teik Hing Thomas Hwa
Lui Ching Dawn Lim
Jason Yan Koon Ngin
Jason Yak Hui Sim
Cheng Pak Gow
Original Assignee
Advanced Systems Automation Limited
Data Storage Institute
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Advanced Systems Automation Limited, Data Storage Institute filed Critical Advanced Systems Automation Limited
Priority to EP98936795A priority Critical patent/EP1039977A4/fr
Priority to JP2000538813A priority patent/JP2002508249A/ja
Publication of WO1999030845A1 publication Critical patent/WO1999030845A1/fr

Links

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B08—CLEANING
    • B08B—CLEANING IN GENERAL; PREVENTION OF FOULING IN GENERAL
    • B08B7/00—Cleaning by methods not provided for in a single other subclass or a single group in this subclass
    • B08B7/0035—Cleaning by methods not provided for in a single other subclass or a single group in this subclass by radiant energy, e.g. UV, laser, light beam or the like
    • B08B7/0042—Cleaning by methods not provided for in a single other subclass or a single group in this subclass by radiant energy, e.g. UV, laser, light beam or the like by laser

Definitions

  • the present invention relates generally to the field of semiconductor packaging, and in particular, to a laser cleaning method and system for removing surface contaminants on moulds used in semiconductor packaging tools.
  • the process for packaging semiconductor devices is well known to those skilled in the art. Generally speaking, the process typically involves placing a chip-carrying substrate between two mould halves, closing the mould halves, and injecting a type of resin material under intense heat and pressure to liquefy and cure the resin material. This is a high-volume process in the sense that a large number devices are typically processed in a relatively short time.
  • the encapsulation process often leaves surface contaminants on the surface of the moulds which can get quite heavy after several hours of continuous running of the packaging tool. These contaminants can be grease, wax, and residual resin. Because the encapsulation process occurs under intense heat and pressure, the contaminants adhere firmly to the surface such that the removal of the contaminants become an extremely difficult task. Consequently, the removal of these surface contaminants is an involved process.
  • the cleaning of the moulds is accomplished by injecting a substance called malamine into the empty moulds, exposing it to intense heat and pressure to liquefy the substance, and then letting it solidify. During this process, the contaminants react with the malamine compound and bond to its surface of the solidified malamine compound.
  • the malamine compound is thrown out.
  • the present invention utilizes laser to remove the surface contaminants such as grease, wax, and resin residue from a mould used in semiconductor packaging tools.
  • the contaminant removal process utilizing the laser involves shooting a beam of laser onto the surface of the mould having the contaminants.
  • the laser is delivered as a pulse which last only a short duration, e.g., 23 nanoseconds (ns). Multiple pulses may be required to completely remove the contaminants. Because the area of coverage for each pulse is usually much smaller than the total area of the mould surface, the laser beam needs to be moved around until the entire mould surface has been exposed to the laser. Because fumes are produced as the laser disintegrates the contaminants, some type of vacuum should be used to remove the residual gas and other debris.
  • the process should be relatively fast-that is, the laser should not take an inordinate time to remove the surface contaminants.
  • the removal process should also be complete-that is the laser should remove all or substantially all of the surface contaminants.
  • the removal process should be non- invasive-that is, it should not damage the mould surface in any substantial way.
  • a number of laser parameters must be controlled. These parameters are, for example: type of laser, power output, wavelength of the laser, type of laser delivery (pulse or continuous), etc.
  • type of laser for example: type of laser, power output, wavelength of the laser, type of laser delivery (pulse or continuous), etc.
  • power output for example: a laser which produces a pulse laser beam having a homogeneous energy profile, and which is non-coherent. These conditions allow for higher peak power, better control of the laser beam and thus a better contaminant removal process. It has been shown that
  • KrF excimer laser has such properties, and thus, is a preferred laser type, though other laser types may carry these properties as well. Also, it is preferred that the laser pulse carry a pulse width of 23 ns (nanoseconds).
  • the laser beam must have sufficient power at a particular wavelength.
  • power is defined in terms of fluence which is defined as energy divided by area where the units are mJ/cm 2 .
  • the wavelength is typically measured in nano-meters or "nm" for short. Although a range of wavelengths is certainly possible, the preferred wavelength is 248 nm. Similarly, while a range of power output is possible, the preferred power output is 300 mJ/cm 2 .
  • the amount of power required to cause damage depends partly on the wavelength of the laser and the type and nature of the material being hit by the laser.
  • KrF excimer laser with a wavelength of 248 nm, a pulse width of 23 ns, a pulse area of coverage of 1 cm 2 , and a fluence level of 300 mJ/cm 2 , it takes at least two pulses at the same location to ensure complete removal of the contaminant layer within the area of coverage.
  • the contaminant layer is typically about 1 to 2 ⁇ m in thickness.
  • the 1 to 2 ⁇ m contaminant depth was formed from continuous
  • the thickness of the contaminant layer would, of course, increase.
  • either the pulse width or the number of pulses per area or a combination of both needs to be modified, though a change in some of the other parameters may also work.
  • the entire mould surface (which has a surface area of about 468 cm 2 ), can be cleaned in about 2 to 3 minutes using the process parameters described above.
  • the pulse area of coverage is basically determined by the size of the laser beam; the larger the size, the larger the area covered by each pulse.
  • the mould surface has various cavities for receiving a semiconductor device and for delivering the resin, the mould surface is not completely flat.
  • the laser pulse may simultaneously expose two or more surfaces of different depths.
  • the focus length may facilitate a difference in the laser energy levels for the different depth. This difference can be significant where the focus length is very small. To avoid this problem, it is preferable have a very long focus length and to use a collimated beam.
  • the cavities on the moulds create one additional problem for the laser cleaning process. It is typical for the cavities to have side walls which are perpendicular to the main surface of the mould. If the laser were to be shot perpendicular to the surface of the mould, the side walls would not receive enough energy from the laser beam, as the beam would essentially be parallel to the side walls. To avoid this problem, it is preferred that the laser beam be shot at an angle to the mould surface. This way, all surfaces can receive sufficient energy from the laser.
  • the laser cleaning process is implemented as a standalone cleaning system which can be steered next to any semiconductor encapsulating tool using a mould.
  • the laser beam is directed via several mirrors to reach an intended target.
  • a mirror is positioned in between the mould halves of an encapsulating machine.
  • the minor is attached to a robotic arm which can precisely rotate the mirror to any angle, and which can also precisely displace the mirror in any position in the plane parallel to the surfaces of the moulds.
  • the robotic arm is attached to an X-Y table which facilitates the positioning of the robotic arm.
  • the mirror receives the laser beam which is directed via a series of other mirrrors.
  • the standalone unit is steered close to the moulding machine.
  • the robotic arm is extended in between the two mould halves, and aligns the mirror to a reference point on the surface of the mould.
  • the laser generator emits two pulses of laser beam which are directed to an area on the surface of the mould via a series of mirrors.
  • a suction system sucks out the fumes and other debris.
  • the X-Y table is moved to a next location and the removal process is initiated again. The process repeats itself until the entire surface of the mould is completed.
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of the preferred embodiment of the present system standing adjacent to a mould assembly typically used in semiconductor packaging machines.
  • FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of the beam delivery assembly for the preferred embodiment of the present system.
  • FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of the X-Y table for the preferred embodiment of the present system.
  • FIG. 4 is an Auger Electron Spectroscopy (AES) spectrum graph illustrating the depth profile of a contaminant layer typically found on moulds used in semiconductor packaging machines before undergoing the laser cleaning process of the present invention.
  • FIG. 5 is an Auger Electron Spectroscopy (AES) spectrum graph illustrating the depth profile of a contaminant layer typically found on moulds used in semiconductor packaging machines after undergoing the laser cleaning process of the present invention.
  • AES Auger Electron Spectroscopy
  • FIG. 6 is an Auger Electron Spectroscopy (AES) spectrum graph illustrating the depth profile of a contaminant layer typically found on moulds used in semiconductor packaging machines after undergoing the laser cleaning process of the present invention for one continuous hour.
  • AES Auger Electron Spectroscopy
  • the present invention utilizes laser to remove the surface contaminants such as grease, wax, and resin residue from a mould used in semiconductor packaging tools.
  • the contaminant removal process utilizing the laser involves shooting a beam of laser onto the surface of the mould having the contaminants.
  • the laser is delivered as a pulse which last only a short duration, e.g., 23 nanoseconds (ns). Multiple pulses may be required to completely remove the contaminants. Because the area of coverage for each pulse is usually much smaller than the total area of the mould surface, the laser beam needs to be moved around until the entire mould surface has been exposed to the laser. Because fumes are produced as the laser disintegrates the contaminants, some type of vacuum should be used to remove the residual gas and other debris.
  • the process should be relatively fast-that is, the laser should not take an inordinate time to remove the surface contaminants.
  • the speed of removal can vary depending on the parameters which are chosen for the laser, preferably, the parameters should be selected such that the duration required to remove all of the contaminants from a single mould half (either bottom or top half) should be no more than 5 minutes.
  • the removal process should also be complete-that is the laser should remove all or substantially all of the surface contaminants. The level of completeness required, of course, depends on the process specification.
  • the removal process should be non-invasive- that is, it should not damage the mould surface in any substantial way. For instance, the mould surface typically has a chrome coating over a steel substrate, and it is important that the laser beam does not cause the peeling of this coating or damage the underlying substrate. And lastly, the process should be relatively safe to the people operating the laser cleaning system.
  • a number of laser parameters must be controlled. These parameters are, for example: type of laser, power output, wavelength of the laser, type of laser delivery (pulse or continuous), etc.
  • parameters are, for example: type of laser, power output, wavelength of the laser, type of laser delivery (pulse or continuous), etc.
  • KrF excimer laser has such properties, and thus, is a preferred laser type, though other laser types may carry these properties as well.
  • the laser pulse carry a pulse width of 23 ns (nanoseconds).
  • At least one type of laser may not be optimal for the removal of contaminants on a mould surface.
  • a beam having a wavelength of 532 nm and another beam having a wavelength of 1064 nm, both having a pulse width of 7 nano-second did not produce optimal results because the laser beams, while did remove the surface contaminants, tended to easily damage the mould surface, a highly undesirable result.
  • the laser beam must have sufficient power at a particular wavelength.
  • power is defined in terms of fluence which is defined as energy divided by area where the units are mJ/cm 2 .
  • the wavelength is typically measured in nano-meters or "nm" for short. Although a range of wavelengths is certainly possible, the preferred wavelength is 248 nm. Similarly, while a range of power output is possible, the preferred power output is 300 mJ/cm 2 .
  • the wavelength it should short enough that there is sufficient energy abso ⁇ tion by the contaminant material. For the present application, it has been found that 248 nm was sufficient.
  • the power should exceed the minimum threshold for removing the contaminants. This threshold depends mainly on the chemical composition of the contaminants. For the types of contaminants typically found in mould surfaces of semiconductor packaging tools, e.g., grease, wax, resin residues, which are usually carbon-based, the threshold was generally found to be around 150 mJ/cm 2 at the wavelength of 248 nm.
  • the minimum power output may not be optimal because the rate of removal may be slow or the removal process may not be complete, that is, some residue may be left over and hence many pulses may be required for a complete removal.
  • the removal performance can be increased by using a shorter wavelength for the laser, and thus, increasing the amount of laser abso ⁇ tion.
  • thermal diffusion length ⁇ and temperature rise ⁇ T on the surface of the mould Two important concepts in analyzing power output as related the possiblity of damage to the underlying material are thermal diffusion length ⁇ and temperature rise ⁇ T on the surface of the mould, both of which are well-known concepts to those skilled in the art. It was determined empirically that ⁇ in the present case was 1.42 ⁇ m which is less than the thickness of the chromium coating. Generally, it is desirable to have a low ⁇ , and particularly in this case, it is preferable that ⁇ does not exceed the
  • the difference in the thermal expansion between the chromium coating and the underlying substrate steel generally becomes significant after an average temperature rise of over 400 degree Celsius, and hence, it is desirable to avoid a power output of the laser which will cause a temperature rise exceeding this level.
  • a laser fluence of 200 mJ/cm 2 with pulse width of 23 ns resulted in an average temperature rise of 175 degrees Celsius, and a laser fluence of 300 mJ/cm 2 at the same pulse width resulted in an average temperature rise of 227 degrees Celsius, both below the undesirable level of 400 degree rise.
  • the precise output level which would cause a temperature rise of 400 degrees Celsius is not known with certainty, it is believed that damage to the mould surface may occur at the fluence level of about 1500 mJ/cm 2 .
  • the contaminant layer is typically about 1 to 2 ⁇ m in thickness.
  • the 1 to 2 ⁇ m contaminant depth was formed from continuous running of the encapsulating tool for a period of about 24 hours. Where the tool is left to run for a longer period, the thickness of the contaminant layer would, of course, increase.
  • either the pulse width or the number of pulses per area or a combination of both needs to be modified, though a change in some of the other parameters may also work. For instance, if the contaminant layer is twice as thick, i.e. 4 ⁇ m, the pulse width may need to be doubled, or possibly, four, instead of two, pulses may be needed. However, because the process is not entirely linear, it may not always be true that the doubling of the thickness of the contaminant layer necessary requires doubling of the process parameter. Hence, some experiment may be needed to find optimal pulse width and/or number of pulses which is required for effective removal of the contaminant layer in a given area of coverage.
  • the entire mould surface (which has a surface area of about 468 cm 2 ), can be cleaned in about 2 to 3 minutes using the process parameters described above.
  • the pulse area of coverage can be increased.
  • the pulse area of coverage is basically determined by the size of the laser beam; the larger the size, the larger the area covered by each pulse.
  • fluence is defined as laser energy divided by surface area
  • increasing the area of coverage per pulse requires the increase in the laser energy per pulse if the same fluence is to be maintained.
  • a more powerful laser generator may be required.
  • another way to decrease the cleaning time is to simply have multiple laser beams shooting at different areas, though this may require multiple laser generators and or a more powerful laser which can be split into multiple beams.
  • the mould surface has various cavities for receiving a semiconductor device and for delivering the resin, the mould surface is not completely flat.
  • the laser pulse may simultaneously expose two or more surfaces of different depths.
  • the focus length may facilitate a difference in the laser energy levels for the different depth. This difference can be significant where the focus length is very small. To avoid this problem, it is preferable have a very long focus length and to use a collimated beam.
  • a typical mould can have a cavity which is about 5 mm in depth. If a focus length of 150 mm is chosen, the difference in the energy delivered to the different depths would be only around 6.8 % which would be an acceptable difference.
  • the cavities on the moulds create one additional problem for the laser cleaning process. It is typical for the cavities to have side walls which are p ⁇ endicular to the main surface of the mould. If the laser were to be shot p ⁇ endicular to the surface of the mould, the side walls would not receive enough energy from the laser beam, as the beam would essentially be parallel to the side walls. To avoid this problem, it is preferred that the laser beam be shot at an angle to the mould surface. This way, all surfaces can receive sufficient energy from the laser. Although the angling of the laser will slightly increase the area of coverage for each laser pulse, this will not be significant, or it can be rectified by increasing the energy level of the pulse. FIGS.
  • FIGS. 4 through 6 demonstrate the effectiveness of this above described cleaning process.
  • FIGS. 4 through 6 illustrate the Auger Electron Spectroscopy (AES) graphs which can be used to analyze the composition of materials at different depths.
  • AES technology is generally well-known to those skilled in the art.
  • FIG.4 is a graph illustrating the composition of an actual contaminant layer found on a mould surface having a chromium coating before the mould underwent the laser cleaning process.
  • Each of the curves represents a particular depth below the surface of the top layer. Hence, a depth of 0 in this case would be the very top of the contaminant layer.
  • the various peaks indicate the presence of a particular material; generally, the higher the peak, the greater the presence.
  • the peaks marked "C” indicate the presence of carbon; the peaks marked “Cr” indicate the presence of chromium; the peaks marked O” indicate the presence of oxygen in the form of oxide.
  • Much of the contaminants found in semiconductor packaging tools carry carbon, and hence, high presence of carbon indicates high levels of contaminants.
  • the presence of oxide is generally indicative of damage which may have occured on the surface of the chromium coating, as the laser can cause oxidation on this surface. Some oxide can also come from the contamination itself.
  • the presence of chromium is desirable since this is the coating material for the mould surface. As can be seen from the graph in FIG. 4, there is a high level of carbon almost up to a depth of 104 nm.
  • FIG. 5 illustrates the composition of the contaminant layer after undergoing the laser cleaning process. Note that a slight level of carbon can be found only at the very top of the layer, and the level drop signficantly even after only a few nanometers in depth. On the other hand, there is a high level of chromium through the entire layer. Some level of oxide is found only near the top layer, which indicates that there is no damage to the chroming surface but that oxide has been absorbed during the transportation of the mould from the cleaning stage to the measuring stage.
  • the laser cleaning process is implemented as a standalone cleaning system 1 which can be steered next to any semiconductor encapsulating tool 60 using a mould, as illustrated in FIG. 1.
  • the laser beam 2 is directed via several mirrors to reach an intended target.
  • the laser generator 20 generates a pulse laser beam 2 which is directed to a beamsplitter which splits a portion of the beam onto a mirror ml which directs the beam 2 onto mirror m2.
  • the othe portion of beam is used to monitor the power level of the laser.
  • the mirror m2 redirects the beam 2 onto m3 which redirects the beam 2 towards lens 1 , 30, and lens 2, 35.
  • the lens 1 and 2 collimate the beam 2 which thereafter hits mirror m4.
  • Mirror m4 redirects the beam 2 onto the mould surface.
  • the number of mirrors needed is depended on the structure of the system and the need to direct the beam in a particular path, and is not integral to the laser cleaning process.
  • the mirror m4 is positioned in between the mould halves 5 and 10.
  • the mirror m4 is attached to a robotic arm (shown in FIG. 3, but not shown in FIG. 1) which can precisely rotate the mirror m4 to any angle, and which can also precisely displace the mirror in any position in the plane parallel to the surfaces 5a and 10a of moulds 5 and 10.
  • the robotic arm is attached to an X-Y table 50 which facilitates the positioning of the robotic arm.
  • FIG. 3 illustrates a schematic diagram of the X-Y table 50 of FIG. 1.
  • the mirror m4 is attached to the robotic arm 52 which is attached to the X-Y table 50.
  • the mirror m4 receives the laser beam 2 which is directed via mirrors m3, m2, and ml as shown in FIG. 2.
  • the standalone unit 1 is steered close to the moulding machine 60.
  • the robotic arm 52 is extended in between the two mould halves 5 and 10, and aligns the mirror m4 to a reference point on the surface of the mould 10.
  • the laser generator 20 emits two pulses of laser beam 2 which are directed to an area on the surface of the mould 10 via a series of mirrors ml , m2, m3 and m4.
  • the angle at which the laser is directed onto the surface of the mould and the energy level of the laser depend somewhat on the type of mould being used, as explained above.
  • a suction system (not shown) sucks out the fumes and other debris.
  • the X-Y table is moved to a next location and the removal process is initiated again. The process repeats itself until the entire surface of the mould 10 is completed. Thereafter, the mirror m4 is rotated such that the laser beam is directed to the top mould 5, and the cleaning process is repeated per the same process applied for the bottom mould 10.
  • the preferred embodiment of the laser cleaning system was a standalone system, it should be appreciated that it can easily be integrated into the encapsulating tool itself. And although here only one laser system was shown, it is entirely possible to have multiple units cleaning several moulds at the same time. Moreover, a single laser beam may be split into multiple beams so that the upper and lower moulds can be cleaned simultaneously. Therefore, the present invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from the spirit or essential characteristics thereof. The presently disclosed embodiments are, therefore, to be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive, the scope of the invention being indicated by the appended claims and all changes which come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are, therefore, to be embraced therein.

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Optics & Photonics (AREA)
  • Cleaning In General (AREA)
  • Laser Beam Processing (AREA)
  • Moulds For Moulding Plastics Or The Like (AREA)
  • Encapsulation Of And Coatings For Semiconductor Or Solid State Devices (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention concerne un laser utilisé pour éliminer des contaminants de surface, tels que graisse, cire et résidus de résine, d'un moule utilisé sur des outils d'encapsulation de semiconducteurs. Le procédé d'élimination des contaminants au moyen d'un laser consiste à diriger un faisceau laser sur la surface du moule portant les contaminants. Le laser est envoyé sous forme d'impulsion de courte durée. Des impulsions multiples peuvent être nécessaires afin d'éliminer complètement les contaminants. Etant donné que la superficie couverte par chaque impulsion est habituellement très inférieure à la superficie totale de la surface du moule, le laser doit balayer la surface du moule jusqu'à ce que celle-ci ait été entièrement exposée au laser. Etant donné que la désintégration des contaminants par le laser produit des émanations, il est préférable d'utiliser un aspirateur afin d'éliminer les gaz résiduels et autres déchets.
PCT/SG1998/000058 1997-12-18 1998-07-06 Procede permettant d'eliminer les contaminants de surface de moules utilises sur des outils d'encapsulation de semiconducteurs WO1999030845A1 (fr)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP98936795A EP1039977A4 (fr) 1997-12-18 1998-07-06 Procede permettant d'eliminer les contaminants de surface de moules utilises sur des outils d'encapsulation de semiconducteurs
JP2000538813A JP2002508249A (ja) 1997-12-18 1998-07-06 半導体パッケージツールで用いられるモールドの表面汚染物を除去するための方法

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
SG9704544-7 1997-12-18
SG1997004544A SG78282A1 (en) 1997-12-18 1997-12-18 A method for removing surface contaminants on moulds used in semiconductor packaging tools

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO1999030845A1 true WO1999030845A1 (fr) 1999-06-24

Family

ID=20429813

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/SG1998/000058 WO1999030845A1 (fr) 1997-12-18 1998-07-06 Procede permettant d'eliminer les contaminants de surface de moules utilises sur des outils d'encapsulation de semiconducteurs

Country Status (7)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1039977A4 (fr)
JP (1) JP2002508249A (fr)
CN (1) CN1210113C (fr)
MY (1) MY136708A (fr)
SG (1) SG78282A1 (fr)
TW (1) TW480689B (fr)
WO (1) WO1999030845A1 (fr)

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP1312454A2 (fr) * 2001-11-16 2003-05-21 Towa Corporation Dispositif et procédé d'évaluation du degré d'adhésion de contaminants à la surface d'un moule, dispositif et procédé de traitement de la surface d'un moule et dispositif et procédé de nettoyage d'un moule pour le moulage de résine
US8709163B2 (en) 2004-11-18 2014-04-29 Samsung Display Co., Ltd. Method of descaling a mask
CN104043617A (zh) * 2014-05-19 2014-09-17 南京南车浦镇城轨车辆有限责任公司 金属表面油污激光清洗设备
WO2018142383A1 (fr) * 2017-01-31 2018-08-09 Advanced laser technology ltd Balayage et nettoyage de moules
US11362473B2 (en) 2016-09-26 2022-06-14 Saint-Gobain Glass France Device and method for producing a patterned functional coating for a glass layer

Families Citing this family (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP4630442B2 (ja) * 2000-10-19 2011-02-09 Ｔｏｗａ株式会社 樹脂成形装置及び樹脂成形方法
JP3789349B2 (ja) * 2001-11-16 2006-06-21 Ｔｏｗａ株式会社 樹脂成形用金型のクリーニング方法及び装置
JP2004230750A (ja) * 2003-01-31 2004-08-19 Sumitomo Heavy Ind Ltd 金型クリーニング方法及び金型クリーニング装置
JP2006317726A (ja) * 2005-05-13 2006-11-24 Nec Lcd Technologies Ltd 断線修正方法及びアクティブマトリックス基板の製造方法並びに表示装置
JP5314876B2 (ja) * 2006-11-22 2013-10-16 アピックヤマダ株式会社 樹脂モールド装置および樹脂モールド方法
CN107377532A (zh) * 2017-08-25 2017-11-24 济南高能清扬激光清洗有限公司 一种橡胶制品模具的复合清洗方法
CN108816960B (zh) * 2018-06-14 2020-06-26 爱阔特(上海)清洗设备制造有限公司 一种半导体光刻板清洗装置
CN108807129B (zh) * 2018-06-21 2020-09-01 北京蜃景光电科技有限公司 镀膜腔室清洗装置及镀膜腔室清洗方法
CN108787631A (zh) * 2018-07-09 2018-11-13 江苏峰钛激光科技有限公司 一种重锈蚀层的激光清洗方法
JP6930946B2 (ja) * 2018-07-10 2021-09-01 Ｔｏｗａ株式会社 成形型クリーニング装置、成形型クリーニング方法、樹脂成形装置、及び樹脂成形品製造方法
JP2020006600A (ja) * 2018-07-10 2020-01-16 Ｔｏｗａ株式会社 成形型クリーニング装置及び方法、樹脂成形装置、並びに樹脂成形品製造方法
CN111375603A (zh) * 2018-12-29 2020-07-07 膳魔师（江苏）家庭制品有限公司 一种保温杯的褪漆方法及装置
CN110303009B (zh) 2019-06-26 2020-10-16 深圳市华星光电技术有限公司 紫外光清洁装置
JP7614987B2 (ja) 2021-09-14 2025-01-16 株式会社東芝 表面浄化方法および表面浄化システム

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DD242760A1 (de) * 1985-11-19 1987-02-11 Akad Wissenschaften Ddr Verfahren zur pruefung der reinheit von substratoberflaechen und zur reinigung derselben
EP0297506A2 (fr) * 1987-07-02 1989-01-04 Ibm Deutschland Gmbh Suppression de particules sur des surfaces compactes par bombardement de laser
US5023424A (en) * 1990-01-22 1991-06-11 Tencor Instruments Shock wave particle removal method and apparatus
WO1994021418A1 (fr) * 1993-03-16 1994-09-29 Vernay Laboratories, Inc. Systeme de nettoyage d'equipement de moulage mettant en ×uvre un laser
EP0792731A2 (fr) * 1996-03-01 1997-09-03 PIRELLI COORDINAMENTO PNEUMATICI S.p.A. Procédé et dispositif pour nettoyer des moules de vulcanisation d'articles en élastomère

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE3767890D1 (de) * 1986-02-14 1991-03-14 Amoco Corp Behandlung von geformten oberflaechen mit ultraviolettlaser.
JPH01122417A (ja) * 1987-11-06 1989-05-15 Rohm Co Ltd 合成樹脂モールド用金型の清掃方法

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DD242760A1 (de) * 1985-11-19 1987-02-11 Akad Wissenschaften Ddr Verfahren zur pruefung der reinheit von substratoberflaechen und zur reinigung derselben
EP0297506A2 (fr) * 1987-07-02 1989-01-04 Ibm Deutschland Gmbh Suppression de particules sur des surfaces compactes par bombardement de laser
US5023424A (en) * 1990-01-22 1991-06-11 Tencor Instruments Shock wave particle removal method and apparatus
WO1994021418A1 (fr) * 1993-03-16 1994-09-29 Vernay Laboratories, Inc. Systeme de nettoyage d'equipement de moulage mettant en ×uvre un laser
US5373140A (en) * 1993-03-16 1994-12-13 Vernay Laboratories, Inc. System for cleaning molding equipment using a laser
EP0792731A2 (fr) * 1996-03-01 1997-09-03 PIRELLI COORDINAMENTO PNEUMATICI S.p.A. Procédé et dispositif pour nettoyer des moules de vulcanisation d'articles en élastomère

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See also references of EP1039977A4 *

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP1312454A2 (fr) * 2001-11-16 2003-05-21 Towa Corporation Dispositif et procédé d'évaluation du degré d'adhésion de contaminants à la surface d'un moule, dispositif et procédé de traitement de la surface d'un moule et dispositif et procédé de nettoyage d'un moule pour le moulage de résine
EP1312454A3 (fr) * 2001-11-16 2003-06-25 Towa Corporation Dispositif et procédé d'évaluation du degré d'adhésion de contaminants à la surface d'un moule, dispositif et procédé de traitement de la surface d'un moule et dispositif et procédé de nettoyage d'un moule pour le moulage de résine
CN1307031C (zh) * 2001-11-16 2007-03-28 东和株式会社 评价型面附着物的附着程度的评价装置及评价方法
US8709163B2 (en) 2004-11-18 2014-04-29 Samsung Display Co., Ltd. Method of descaling a mask
CN104043617A (zh) * 2014-05-19 2014-09-17 南京南车浦镇城轨车辆有限责任公司 金属表面油污激光清洗设备
US11362473B2 (en) 2016-09-26 2022-06-14 Saint-Gobain Glass France Device and method for producing a patterned functional coating for a glass layer
WO2018142383A1 (fr) * 2017-01-31 2018-08-09 Advanced laser technology ltd Balayage et nettoyage de moules
GB2573256A (en) * 2017-01-31 2019-10-30 Advanced Laser Tech Ltd Scanning and cleaning of moulds

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
MY136708A (en) 2008-11-28
EP1039977A4 (fr) 2003-08-13
TW480689B (en) 2002-03-21
EP1039977A1 (fr) 2000-10-04
CN1282277A (zh) 2001-01-31
CN1210113C (zh) 2005-07-13
SG78282A1 (en) 2001-02-20
JP2002508249A (ja) 2002-03-19

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
WO1999030845A1 (fr) Procede permettant d'eliminer les contaminants de surface de moules utilises sur des outils d'encapsulation de semiconducteurs
US20210316400A1 (en) Laser processing apparatus, methods of laser-processing workpieces and related arrangements
US4937421A (en) Laser peening system and method
US7170029B2 (en) Method and apparatus for deflashing of integrated circuit packages
US6054673A (en) Method and apparatus for laser drilling
JP2003506216A (ja) 回路シンギュレーションシステム及び方法
JPH06198475A (ja) 連続波紫外線照射による有機固形物の切断法
JPH02182389A (ja) レーザによる切除方法
JP4829748B2 (ja) バリ取り装置及びバリ取り方法、並びに樹脂製品の製造方法
JP2008149705A (ja) 樹脂モールド装置および樹脂モールド方法
JP2003504836A (ja) 成形バリ除去方法および装置
WO2006027850A1 (fr) Procede d'amelioration de l'adherence d'une couche mince
JP2005088068A (ja) レーザ加工装置及びレーザ加工工法
KR100953185B1 (ko) 비축-회전 광학계를 이용한 레이저의 조사 방법 및 장치,이를 이용한 필름 레지스터의 트리밍 방법 및 장치, 그리고인쇄회로기판의 제조 방법
US20070127029A1 (en) Laser treatment apparatus
WO1999030844A1 (fr) Systeme d'enlevement de contaminants de surface sur des moules utilises pour le conditionnement de semi-conducteurs
WO1999065061A2 (fr) Dispositif laser portatif destine au nettoyage de machines d'encapsulation pour semi-conducteurs
KR20180000306A (ko) 웨이퍼의 가공 방법
JP2682230B2 (ja) レーザ加工方法
KR19990062418A (ko) 반도체 패키징 도구에서 이용되는 주형에서, 표면 오염 물질을제거하기 위한 시스템.
JP7473124B2 (ja) レーザ処理済みコンクリート表面
JPH06170563A (ja) パルスレーザ光を用いた加工方法
KR19990062423A (ko) 반도체 포장기구에 사용되는 주형의 표면오염을 제거하기 위한방법
JPH09510412A (ja) 木材表面の製造方法及び装置
Lu et al. Laser cleaning of IC mould and its real-time monitoring

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 98812286.3

Country of ref document: CN

AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): CN JP MX

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 1998936795

Country of ref document: EP

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 1998936795

Country of ref document: EP

WWW Wipo information: withdrawn in national office

Ref document number: 1998936795

Country of ref document: EP

点击 这是indexloc提供的php浏览器服务，不要输入任何密码和下载