PROGRESSIVE, MULTIFOCAL OPHTHALMIC LENS HAVING CONSTANT
GEOMETRY AND VARIABLE REFRACTION INDEX.
Field of the invention
The lens object of the present invention is defined as a constant geometry, progressive, multifocal, ophthalmic lens having variable refraction index.
This is a completely new and revolutionary lens in comparison to the ones presently manufactured for the same use.
It shows advantages and considerable improvements, as described further, on both from the optical point of view - the image's peripheric distortion areas are almost completely removed; it allows the greatest visual comfort, etc. - and from the technical manufacturing one - in fact the optical working of said lens is greatly simplified with a consequent knocking down of production costs.
Before describing the features of the lens of the present invention, it is described what a progressive, multifocal lens is and the present known concepts for its manufacture.
State of the art
The progressive, multifocal lens (Fig. 1 ) is conceived for the visual correction of presbyopia.
This means that it is a lens allowing corrections with different diopters for far sight and near sight.
Moreover, this lens has an intermediate optical area between the far sight and the near sight wherein the diopter is progressively and variably increased from the far sight degree to the near sight degree in order to allow a good sight for intermediate distances too. Said lens is the improved version of the bifocal one (Fig. 2) wherein the "upper" area of the lens shows the diopter for the far sight and the "lower" one the diopter for the near sight.
In said lens the long-sighted person can clearly see from far and from near at a reading distance but it is impossible to have the same clear sight for the intermediate distances.
Before the invention of the progressive, multifocal lens, the trifocal ones have
been invented (see Figure 3).
They have a small intermediate area / between the far sight area and the near one to allow the sight even at an intermediate predetermined distance but they do not allow a good sight in variable progression. The progressive, multifocal lenses, which are presently manufactured, have the previously described features but they show limited performance and have unavoidable non-functional great optical areas wherein there are the alterations which do not allow a clear peripheral sight, particularly in the near sight. This is the unavoidable consequence of the present construction technology, even though all possible trials to reduce at most such non-functional areas of the lenses have been made.
In fact the progressive multifocal lenses, as all the other lenses included the monofocal ones, which are presently produced, are obtained from a glass or other optical material disk (rough block), which is homogeneous in refraction index in all its bulk. It is glass at constant "gradient".
So, in order to obtain a constant dioptic progression from far to near, it has been necessary the construction of a lens having a "variable geometry", that means by employing different curving rays for far and for near and with intermediate curving rays in constant progression in order to join up the area with the curving ray from near.
This working process is consequently very complex and it needs a complicated technology, heavily affecting the production costs.
Nonetheless in the multifocal progressive lens thus produced (Fig. 4) it is technically impossible to obtain variable progression curves which are constant all over the lens surface.
In fact, this lens shows a quite good optical area for the far sight, even though this area incidentally shows some distortions too, but, on the contrary, the useful near sight area is necessarily very limited and it changes according to the manufacturing companies and to the kind of progressive lens produced, said area does not change much but this change is always in the order of few millimetres. Moreover, the intermediate sight area, that means the progression one, is the
most penalized, in fact, this area is good in an "optical channel" whose side width is not larger than one millimetre.
Moreover, these lenses owing the above described features, during the cutting phase, in order to be put into the glass frame, need an almost perfect "blocking" in comparison to the interpupillary distance of the bearer, otherwise they cannot be used.
Moreover even though the assembling process is perfectly carried out, the limited useful optical areas of the same lenses causes considerable inconveniences in the near sight and a good deal of patience is required to bearers in order to get used to the glass.
Brief Description of the Figures
Figure 1 shows a progressive multifocal lens wherein the areas having different dioptric values are represented.
Figure 2 shows a bifocal lens having the upper area for far sight and the lower area for near sight.
Figure 3 shows a tri-focal lens having a small intermediate area / between the far sight and the near sight areas.
Figure 4 shows a progressive multifocal lens having "variable geometry".
Figure 5 progressive, multifocal lens having three optical areas with different refractive index and constant geometry.
Figure 6 Rough-block having three different optical areas
Figure 7 Graphic representation of the distribution of granules A and B in the progression area, i.e. intermediate area (b), wherein:
• ■ black granules, material A, index n1 ® a grey granules, material B, index n3
Figure 8 Device for the variable progression composition of the granules of A and
B material, wherein:
A hopper for material A (having refraction index n,)
B hopper for material B (having refraction index n3) F feeding devices
M mixer, C container for the settled mixture granules having variable progression.
Figure 9 Diagram feeding speed/material quantity versus time: vA= rotating feeding device speed for material A vB= rotating feeding device speed for material B.
Figure 10 Apparatus for merging granules, wherein: 1 = Autoclave
2 = Thermocouple
3 = Melting pot
4 = Granules
5 = Resistance 6 = Vacuum-control manometer
7 = Vacuum pump
8 = Continuous current feeder
Figure 11 Possible additions of the dioptric value in function of the dioptric values for sight from far. Detailed description of the invention
The lens object of the present invention, which is called "MIV" (Fig. 5) i.e. progressive, multifocal lens having variable refraction index and constant geometry, shows the peculiarity of being obtained from a glass or other optical material rough block having different refraction indexes in the zones corresponding to the three sight areas: an n1 for the far sight area (for instance 1.5), and n3 for the near sight one (for instance 1.7) and in the intermediate dioptric progression area a variable index n2 which changes in constant progression from the far sight value to the near sight one. The above mentioned examples refer to "positive" lenses, that means to lenses in which the dioptric value from near is higher than the one from far. In the case of "negative" lens wherein the dioptric value from near is lower than the one from far, the refraction indexes are put with the inverted values: that means the greater index upward and the smaller one downward with the progression area in which the index progressively decreases from the greater value to the smaller one. In practice, the dioptric progression is not generated any more by variable
geometry but by the same composition of the optical material. In fact a lens made from a rough block having these features and employing constant geometry curves, such as the traditional curves, i.e. an internal spherical concave curve and an external spherical convex curve for the construction of a spherical meniscus, will show the features of the progressive multifocal lens but it will not have the limits of the multifocal ones which are presently produced, that means that the useful area will be there on all the lens surface and on all its portions: far sight area, progressive intermediate sight area and near sight area. The process in order to obtain these rough blocks is described here below. It is confirmed that from this kind of rough block the progressive lens is obtained by working both the internal basis and the external one with constant geometry surfaces that means in the same way in which the monofocal lenses are manufactured as it is just the different refraction index in the different points of the material itself that causes the dioptrical progression. The features and the advantages of this lens can be thus summarized:
■ useful sight all over the lens surface in the far sight area, in the near sight area and in the intermediate area of dioptric progression.
■ Production costs are knocked down, as the manufacturing process is similar to the one of the monofocal lenses. Manufacturing process of the rough blocks in order to obtain constant geometry. "MIV" multifocal progressive lenses having an intermediate dioptric progression area made of a material having variable refraction index.
For the manufacturing of the progressive multifocal lenses having variable refractive index as previously described, it is necessary to start with a rough-block made of glass or other optical material in which block there are three areas having refractive indexes different from each other. The rough-block has a cylindrical shape: Fig. 6 shows the upper face of the block with the three areas (a), (b) and
(c).
If it is necessary to obtain a "positive" lens, the upper area (a) must show a low refraction index (for instance 1 ,5) the lower area (c) a high refraction index in relation to the "addition" to be obtained (for instance 1 ,7) while the intermediate
area (b) must show a constantly changing downward refraction index starting from the lower index (i.e. 1 ,5), in the upper area (a), until the higher index (i.e. 1 ,7), of the lower area, is reached in constant progression. The width of these three areas must be determined according to the functional features the lens should have. The progression area's width should be set according to the use to which the lenses are intended to, for example: wide or limited sight area at the intermediate distances between far and near. The quantification of the refraction indexes to be employed must be determined from time to time according to the final diopters the lens must have: diopters from far and amount of the addition for near.
Furthermore you have to taken into consideration also the kind of lens you want to obtain: for example, if a lens is needed with a high index for the thickness reduction or a lens having a normal thickness for low diopters, and so on. As described above, there are usually three or four or more optical areas for particular needs; one of these is a variable progression one.
The "MIV" lenses object of the present invention have all the functional features of the present progressive lenses, that means correct sight from far, in the progression are and from near, but they do not show the marginal areas of astigmatic aberrations, that means that they offer a complete sight area all over the lens surface; moreover, they are manufactured by forming monofocal surfaces in the rough block both in the outer and in the inner part.
Thanks to the working simplicity of this process, production costs are remarkably reduced. The range of possible manufacturing of the "MIV" progression lenses is shown in the chart of Fig. 11 , in which, as an example, two kinds of extreme refraction index glass are considered, that means two kinds of glass having respectively 1 ,5 and 1 ,9 refractive index.
The possible additions can be also calculated by using combinations of different indexes, for example 1 ,5 with 1 ,8/1 ,6 with 1 ,8/1 ,6, with 1 ,9, etc. The result of the calculations with the suitable formulas of the resulting diopters taken from a rough block having the above mentioned composition, in this case
with 1 ,5 and 1 ,9 refraction indexes and considering that the curves produced have a constant geometry, as in the monofocal meniscuses, the range of possible additions is obtained.
As it is shown, with low dioptric values for sight from far, low additions are obtained but the higher the dioptric value from far is, the broader the addition range is.
It is impossible with this kind of variable refraction index lenses to obtain high additions with low diopters from far; nevertheless this limit is greatly compensated by the possibility of having the total range of additions when the diopter is quite high.
It is indeed with the high diopters that the variable geometry traditional progressive lenses show the greatest drawbacks such as the utmost reduction of the sight area, increased areas with side astigmatisms, etc.
If desired, the range of additions can be bridged, in case that is impossible by the sole variable refraction index, also by manufacturing said lenses with a variable refraction index material rough block, as described above, and forming variable geometry curves as the traditional progressive lenses thus obtaining the result of having far higher performances in comparison to these latters, because the lens, having different indexes in the different areas, will allow to reach the desired addition by using much less differentiated curves between the far sight and the near sight with a reduction of the aberration area and an increase of the useful sight area.
The "MIV" lens manufacturing process is now described.
The materials employed to manufacture the variable refraction index rough block must have melting characteristics compatible between them.
In order to produce the rough blocks, the starting materials must be in granules.
The final result of the merging of the two glasses or other optical materials, having indexes n., and n3> in the progression area, is shown in Fig. 7.
In said picture, in order to further clarify the above mentioned concept, granules having an n1 index (defined as material A) are represented with blue disks and the ones having an n3 index (defined as material B) are represented with red ones.
As a picture shows, the A material starts from the 100% of content at the beginning of the progression area (left side of the Fig. 7) and it decrease in a progressive and constant way until the 0% is reached at the end of said progression area (right side of the Fig. 7). On the contrary, the B material starts from 0% of content at the beginning of the progression area and it reaches 100% at the end of said progression area. The A and B materials are thus merged together in an homogeneous and inversely progressive way.
The particular distribution at inversely variable and homogeneous proportions of the two kinds of A and B material granules, is obtained with a special mixer (this mixer is object of the present invention too) described in Fig. 8.
Said mixer puts the granules in a container having the size of the rough block progression area.
The mixing takes place by vertical drop of the granules, controlled by two feeding devices which are suitably grooved length wise and pick up the material from two different hoppers: an hopper for each of the two kinds of material.
The rotating speed of each of these two feeding devices, and therefore the input quantity of the material, is electronically driven in order to have a simultaneous fall of the two materials in inversely proportional quantities. Said mixer is helped by a volumetric or ponderal dosing device and the mixing can be automatic or helped.
In Figure 9 there are graphically shown the variation of the speed of the feeding devices, in function of the time, and, consequently, the amounts of material A and
B respectively settled. In order to obtain the blocking of the settled granules, said granules must be moistened by capillarity with deionized water in the position in which they have been settled and then the whole moistened material is frozen.
In this way the progression portion can be handled without being subjected to deterioration or mixing and can be stored without time limit in a freezer. For the preparation of the rough-block formed by three optical areas (portions) according to the invention, the three portions are composed in the melting pot,
namely:
■ the portion consisting of the granules of index n., (granules of material A) for the far sight area,
■ the progressive index portion, consisting of the previously frozen granules (A +B) for the intermediate sight area,
■ the portion consisting of the granules of index n3 granules of material B) for the near sight area.
For the manufacture of the optical glass rough blocks the total or partial melting occurs in an oven having controlled pressure and atmosphere (see Fig. 10). Moreover, the melting-pot can be flat or meniscus shaped with basic curves in order to facilitate the mechanical working of the lens. Said meniscus shape can be also obtained during the rebaking of the rough-block by any means. If necessary, more than three optical areas can be realized in the rough-block. The grinding of the starting material (for instance glass) will take place with any means suitable for assuring the desired size of the granules by employing also a screening having differential volumetric measures and a forced depulverization. All these technologies can be employed for all the production or only for some kinds of glass compositions. For example, a prototype has been manufactured by using a 1.5 index glass for the far sight portion and a 1.7 index glass for the near sight portion. Both types of glass grinded in form of granules having 0.4 mm size were composed according to the method previously disclosed in order to obtain the progression portion. This progression portion in form of a block of mixed granules A + B, was then moistured and frozen. The frozen mixed granules block was placed in a melting pot in order to form the progression portion (b) of the rough-block, whereas in portion (a) granules of material A and in portion (c) granules of material B were charged. The charged material was subsequently subjected to a merging through total or partial melting at 750°C in an oven having a high vacuum atmosphere. The melting apparatus is shown in figure 10.