+

WO1998058750A1 - Particulate material separation - Google Patents

Particulate material separation Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO1998058750A1
WO1998058750A1 PCT/AU1998/000470 AU9800470W WO9858750A1 WO 1998058750 A1 WO1998058750 A1 WO 1998058750A1 AU 9800470 W AU9800470 W AU 9800470W WO 9858750 A1 WO9858750 A1 WO 9858750A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
bed
particulate material
inducing
particle
lower density
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/AU1998/000470
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
John Michael Frederick Clout
Maureen Teresa O'connor
Original Assignee
Commonwealth Scientific And Industrial Research Organisation
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Commonwealth Scientific And Industrial Research Organisation filed Critical Commonwealth Scientific And Industrial Research Organisation
Priority to AU78985/98A priority Critical patent/AU7898598A/en
Publication of WO1998058750A1 publication Critical patent/WO1998058750A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B07SEPARATING SOLIDS FROM SOLIDS; SORTING
    • B07BSEPARATING SOLIDS FROM SOLIDS BY SIEVING, SCREENING, SIFTING OR BY USING GAS CURRENTS; SEPARATING BY OTHER DRY METHODS APPLICABLE TO BULK MATERIAL, e.g. LOOSE ARTICLES FIT TO BE HANDLED LIKE BULK MATERIAL
    • B07B13/00Grading or sorting solid materials by dry methods, not otherwise provided for; Sorting articles otherwise than by indirectly controlled devices
    • B07B13/003Separation of articles by differences in their geometrical form or by difference in their physical properties, e.g. elasticity, compressibility, hardness
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B07SEPARATING SOLIDS FROM SOLIDS; SORTING
    • B07BSEPARATING SOLIDS FROM SOLIDS BY SIEVING, SCREENING, SIFTING OR BY USING GAS CURRENTS; SEPARATING BY OTHER DRY METHODS APPLICABLE TO BULK MATERIAL, e.g. LOOSE ARTICLES FIT TO BE HANDLED LIKE BULK MATERIAL
    • B07B13/00Grading or sorting solid materials by dry methods, not otherwise provided for; Sorting articles otherwise than by indirectly controlled devices
    • B07B13/10Grading or sorting solid materials by dry methods, not otherwise provided for; Sorting articles otherwise than by indirectly controlled devices using momentum effects
    • B07B13/11Grading or sorting solid materials by dry methods, not otherwise provided for; Sorting articles otherwise than by indirectly controlled devices using momentum effects involving travel of particles over surfaces which separate by centrifugal force or by relative friction between particles and such surfaces, e.g. helical sorters
    • B07B13/113Grading or sorting solid materials by dry methods, not otherwise provided for; Sorting articles otherwise than by indirectly controlled devices using momentum effects involving travel of particles over surfaces which separate by centrifugal force or by relative friction between particles and such surfaces, e.g. helical sorters shaking tables

Definitions

  • Particulate material can be separated by a variety of techniques which can be broadly classified as wet techniques and dry techniques .
  • Wet techniques can be used in cases where water is required for subsequent processing. However, where that is not the case, the introduction of water into a separation process is undesirable because it drastically increases costs associated with materials handling, thickening, filtration, drying etc.
  • the present invention relates to an apparatus and method for the physical separation of particulate material.
  • the present invention is primarily concerned with dry separation but it is to be understood that the present invention may be used as a wet technique.
  • the present invention is particularly suited but is not limited to the separation of particles in the size range of lO ⁇ m-lOOmm, more particularly 100 ⁇ m-50mm, on the basis of differences in density (specific gravity) .
  • the present invention has particular, although not exclusive, application to the separation of particulate material in the mining and related industries.
  • a fluidising or suspending agent such as air or water to achieve density separation.
  • US patent no. 3486620 discloses an apparatus for concentrating ore in which compressed air is upwardly directed through the particulate material and is arranged to lift lighter particles whilst having no or minimal affect on heavier particles.
  • Australian patent application no. 10923/88 similarly teaches a method of dry separation of solids in which air is used as a fluidising agent.
  • Australian patent application no. 28485/92 discloses a sizing and concentrating apparatus which utilises a vibrating launder in which the bottom of the launder is formed of a plurality of spaced slats one plane of which is substantially horizontal to provide a stepped decline to produce a fluidised bed of particles of differing sizing and characteristics.
  • the apparatus is said to be particularly useful in the case of particles in the range of minus 3mm and minus 75 ⁇ m.
  • the apparatus does not utilise a fluidising agent; however, it is said that the horizontal and vertical faces of each step of the stepped decline perform essential functions in particle transport and bed dilation. It is further said that the stepped decline which forms the particle bed base is vibrated such that the vibration promotes particle segregation and is essential for the proper functioning of the horizontal and vertical faces of each step.
  • the present invention utilises an analogous mechanism to fluidisation without the use of a fluidising agent by inducing particle-particle interaction of particulate material.
  • the present invention may be used as a wet technique but it is to be noted that, where water is used in a wet technique, the water is not required as a fluidising agent.
  • the present invention provides an apparatus for separating particulate material, the apparatus including: supporting means for supporting a bed of the particulate material, means for inducing particle-particle interaction of particulate material in the bed whereby lower density particulate material migrates towards the top of the bed, and separation means for separating at least a portion of said lower density material from an upper portion of the bed.
  • the present invention provides a method for separating particulate material, the method including the steps of: forming a bed of the particulate material, inducing particle-particle interaction of particulate material in the bed whereby lower density particulate material migrates towards the top of the bed, and separating at least a portion of said lower density material from an upper portion of the bed.
  • the supporting means may take the form of a trough mounted on a deck of a vibrating frame.
  • the frame may be vibrated by a linear reciprocating motion which may be imparted to the frame at an angle to the plane of the deck.
  • the frame may be vibrated by a non-linear motion, for example, a circular or elliptical motion.
  • Non-linear motion may be imparted by a variable speed motor driving an out of balance flywheel.
  • the vibratory motion may be a combination of a number of distinct vibratory motions.
  • the supporting means takes the form of a trough mounted on a deck which is in turn mounted on springs on a vibrating frame.
  • the bed of particulate material is "fluidised" by the means for inducing particle-particle interaction in the absence of a fluidising agent.
  • the extent of fluidisation of the bed can be controlled by controlling a number of variables including the nature of the vibratory motion, the angle of the vibratory motion with respect to the supporting means, the amplitude of the motion, the frequency of the motion and the depth of the bed with the variables preferably optimised for a given sample of particulate material.
  • the extent of fluidisation of the bed is largely determined by the amplitude of the motion which is preferably sufficient to induce particle-particle interaction of the particulate material allowing stratification of the bed but not so large as to induce too strong interaction between particles which obviates stratification and hence separation.
  • the frequency of the motion largely affects the speed of interaction between particles within the bed and the rate at which lower density particles migrate upwardly through the bed.
  • the bed depth is preferably at least about 5 particle diameters which has been found to be sufficient to enable particle-particle interaction to be established with upward displacement of lower density particles .
  • Particulate material may be separated by batch or continuous operation with continuous operation being preferred.
  • the separation means can take a variety of forms. For example, material may be raked from the top of the bed; lower density material may be caused to flow over a weir or through an aperture; or, at an intermediate level in the bed lower density and higher density material may be caused to be separated by encountering a standard scrapper bar or cutter plate.
  • the supporting means may be disposed substantially horizontally or may be inclined at an angle of up to about 45° and the nature of the motion from linear through elliptical to circular may be selected to optimise particle-particle interaction within the bed.
  • Inclination of the supporting means may assist separation of lower density material by enabling the lower density particles to flow under gravity over a weir or through an aperture in a lowered bed wall once they have migrated to an upper portion of the bed.
  • the angle of inclination is preferably variable.
  • a separation enhancing agent such as water or ferrosilicon particles may be added to the bed to enhance separation.
  • Separation may be effected on a continuous basis with the apparatus preferably including feed means for introducing particulate material into the bed for continuous operation.
  • the feed means preferably takes the form of a vibratory or belt feeder which may introduce particulate material at a point or as a curtain, preferably evenly across the width of the supporting means .
  • a plurality of beds may be arranged to be used in series in accordance with the present invention.
  • particulate material separated from a first bed may be introduced to another bed arranged to provide either improved separation at the same density or further separation at a different density.
  • an apparatus according to the present invention can be used to separate a feed of particulate material into various fractions with the densities of the particles in the various fractions being variable.
  • Example 1 Preferred embodiments of the present invention will now be described by way of example.
  • Example 1 Preferred embodiments of the present invention.
  • a batch test was conducted on a sample of iron ore in a rectangular trough 340mm wide by 260mm long by 60mm deep and mounted horizontally on a vibrating table in the form of a modified General Kinematics screen deck.
  • the screen deck was modified by replacing the screens with the trough.
  • the size range of the feed material was 13- 22mm.
  • the test was conducted on an 8.3kg sample containing 4.6% gangue (SG ⁇ 3.5) which formed a 50mm deep bed.
  • the vibratory motion imparted to the trough was a linear reciprocating motion which was imparted at an angle of 30° to the horizontal at a frequency of 50 Hz and an amplitude of 1mm. Particle-particle ' interactions were established in the bed resulting in fluidisation caused by the vibratory motion.
  • a batch test was conducted on a sample of iron ore in the trough of Example 1 which was mounted on a modified Denver-Dillon screen deck at an inclination of about 8° to the horizontal.
  • the screen deck was modified by replacing the screens with the trough.
  • the 260mm sides of the trough were inclined at 8° with one of the 340mm rims being elevated with respect to the other of the 340mm rims.
  • the size range of the feed material was 13-22mm.
  • the test was conducted on an 8.0kg sample containing 6.4% gangue (SG ⁇ 3.5).
  • the vibratory motion imparted to the trough was circular with the plane of the motion substantially normal to the 340 rims of the trough at a frequency of 50Hz and an amplitude of 2mm.
  • the circular vibratory motion was imparted by a variable speed motor driving a pair of standard out of balance flywheels connected by a drive shaft. Particle-particle interactions were established in the bed resulting in fluidisation caused by the vibratory motion. Gangue migrated to the surface of the bed and accumulated in one of the lower corners from which it was manually collected and hence separated from the higher density particles (SG: 4.3-4.65). Approximately 80% of the gangue was separated from the feed material in approximately 2 minutes.
  • a continuous test was conducted on a sample of iron ore (13 -22mm) in a rectangular trough 300mm wide by 705mm long by 300mm deep and mounted horizontally on the screen deck of Example 2.
  • the sample was continuously fed from a vibratory feeder to a point adjacent a corner of the trough at a feed rate of 700kg per hour.
  • One of the longer walls was formed with a tail aperture for removal of lower density (tail) material.
  • the aperture was rectangular, centrally located in the longer wall, 390mm wide, and extended from the upper edge of the longer wall to a maximum depth of 280mm.
  • the size of the aperture was adjustable by raising and lowering a sliding gate; the upper edge of which formed the lower edge of the aperture.
  • the width of the aperture was also adjustable.
  • the gate was positioned such that the tail aperture was 390mm wide by 170mm deep.
  • a product aperture for removal of higher density (product) material was formed in the other of the longer walls .
  • the product aperture was located in the bottom corner of the longer wall remote from the corner at which the product was fed to the trough and was of adjustable size by provision of a sliding gate.
  • the product aperture was in the form of a quadrant of radius 70mm.
  • the gate was positioned such that the product aperture was wide open.
  • the vibratory motion imparted to the trough was elliptical with the plane of the motion substantially normal to the long sides of the trough at a frequency of 50Hz and an amplitude of l-2mm.
  • the elliptical vibratory motion was imparted by a variable speed motor driving a pair of standard out of balance flywheels connected by a drive shaft with the screen deck weighted to modify the circular motion which would otherwise be induced. Particle-particle interactions were established in the bed resulting in fluidisation caused by the vibratory motion with lower SG material continuously collected from the tail aperture and higher SG material continuously collected from the product aperture .
  • a continuous test was conducted on a sample of iron ore (6-30mm) in a rectangular trough 300mm wide by 600mm long by 300mm deep and mounted horizontally on the screen deck of Example 2.
  • the sample was continuously fed from a vibratory feeder to the middle of the trough as curtain between the long sides of the trough and substantially parallel to the short sides of the trough at a feed rate of 500kg per hour.
  • One of the longer wall-s was formed with a tail aperture for removal of lower density (tail) material.
  • the aperture was rectangular, located adjacent a corner of the trough, 100mm wide, and extended from the upper edge of the longer wall to a maximum depth of 280mm.
  • the size of the aperture was adjustable by raising and lowering a sliding gate; the upper edge of which formed the lower edge of the aperture.
  • the gate was positioned such that the tail aperture was 100mm wide by 165mm deep.
  • a triangular product aperture for removal of higher density (product) material was formed in the same longer wall as the tail aperture.
  • the product aperture was located in the bottom of the longer wall adjacent the corner remote from the tail aperture and was of adjustable size by provision of a sliding gate.
  • the gate was positioned such that the product aperture was a right angle triangle having a base of 100mm and a height of 120mm.
  • the vibratory motion imparted to the trough was elliptical with the plane of the motion substantially normal to the long sides of the trough at a frequency of 70Hz and an amplitude of 0.5-lmm.
  • the elliptical vibratory motion was imparted by a variable speed motor driving a pair of standard out of balance flywheels connected by a drive shaft with the screen deck weighted to modify the circular motion which would otherwise be induced.
  • Particle-particle interactions were established in the bed resulting in fluidisation caused by the vibratory motion with lower SG material continuously collected from the tail aperture and higher SG material continuously collected from the product aperture.
  • Example 5 A batch test was conducted on a 60g sample of a mixture of 75% by weight magnetite of SG 5.5 and 25% by weight silica of SG 2.65 in the rectangular trough of Example 1 mounted horizontally on the screen deck of Example 2 with a 3mm bed depth.
  • the size range of the feed material was 100-300 ⁇ m.
  • the primary vibratory motion imparted to the trough was elliptical with the plane of the motion substantially normal to the long sides of the trough at a frequency of 50 Hz and an amplitude of 1mm.
  • the elliptical vibratory motion was imparted by a variable speed motor driving a pair of standard out of balance flywheels connected by a drive shaft with the screen deck weighted to modify the circular motion which would otherwise be induced.
  • a secondary linear reciprocating vibratory motion was also imparted to the trough.
  • the secondary motion was a vertical motion at a frequency of 50 Hz and an amplitude of 1.5mm. Particle-particle interactions were established in the bed resulting in fluidisation caused by the vibratory motions.
  • Two distinct bands were formed in the trough; the lower band (high SG) contained 95% by weight magnetite and 5% by weight silica and the upper band (low SG) contained 82% by weight magnetite and 38% by weight silica.

Landscapes

  • Manufacture And Refinement Of Metals (AREA)

Abstract

An apparatus for separating particulate material includes supporting means for supporting a bed of the particulate material, means for inducing particle-particle interaction of particulate material in the bed whereby lower density particulate material migrates towards the top of the bed, and separation means for separating at least a portion of said lower density material from an upper portion of the bed.

Description

PARTICULATE MATERIAL SEPARATION
TECHNICAL FIELD
Particulate material can be separated by a variety of techniques which can be broadly classified as wet techniques and dry techniques . Wet techniques can be used in cases where water is required for subsequent processing. However, where that is not the case, the introduction of water into a separation process is undesirable because it drastically increases costs associated with materials handling, thickening, filtration, drying etc.
The present invention relates to an apparatus and method for the physical separation of particulate material. The present invention is primarily concerned with dry separation but it is to be understood that the present invention may be used as a wet technique. The present invention is particularly suited but is not limited to the separation of particles in the size range of lOμm-lOOmm, more particularly 100μm-50mm, on the basis of differences in density (specific gravity) .
The present invention has particular, although not exclusive, application to the separation of particulate material in the mining and related industries. BACKGROUND ART Various prior art separation techniques have been proposed in which a "fluidised bed" of the particulate material is formed by use of a fluidising or suspending agent such as air or water to achieve density separation. For example, US patent no. 3486620 discloses an apparatus for concentrating ore in which compressed air is upwardly directed through the particulate material and is arranged to lift lighter particles whilst having no or minimal affect on heavier particles. Australian patent application no. 10923/88 similarly teaches a method of dry separation of solids in which air is used as a fluidising agent.
Australian patent application no. 28485/92 discloses a sizing and concentrating apparatus which utilises a vibrating launder in which the bottom of the launder is formed of a plurality of spaced slats one plane of which is substantially horizontal to provide a stepped decline to produce a fluidised bed of particles of differing sizing and characteristics. The apparatus is said to be particularly useful in the case of particles in the range of minus 3mm and minus 75μm. The apparatus does not utilise a fluidising agent; however, it is said that the horizontal and vertical faces of each step of the stepped decline perform essential functions in particle transport and bed dilation. It is further said that the stepped decline which forms the particle bed base is vibrated such that the vibration promotes particle segregation and is essential for the proper functioning of the horizontal and vertical faces of each step.
In contrast to prior art techniques, the present invention utilises an analogous mechanism to fluidisation without the use of a fluidising agent by inducing particle-particle interaction of particulate material. As previously mentioned, the present invention may be used as a wet technique but it is to be noted that, where water is used in a wet technique, the water is not required as a fluidising agent. DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION In a first aspect, the present invention provides an apparatus for separating particulate material, the apparatus including: supporting means for supporting a bed of the particulate material, means for inducing particle-particle interaction of particulate material in the bed whereby lower density particulate material migrates towards the top of the bed, and separation means for separating at least a portion of said lower density material from an upper portion of the bed.
In a second aspect, the present invention provides a method for separating particulate material, the method including the steps of: forming a bed of the particulate material, inducing particle-particle interaction of particulate material in the bed whereby lower density particulate material migrates towards the top of the bed, and separating at least a portion of said lower density material from an upper portion of the bed.
Preferably, particle-particle interaction of particulate material in the bed is induced by subjecting the supporting means to vibratory motion. The supporting means may take the form of a trough mounted on a deck of a vibrating frame. The frame may be vibrated by a linear reciprocating motion which may be imparted to the frame at an angle to the plane of the deck. Alternatively, the frame may be vibrated by a non-linear motion, for example, a circular or elliptical motion. Non-linear motion may be imparted by a variable speed motor driving an out of balance flywheel. The vibratory motion may be a combination of a number of distinct vibratory motions. Preferably, the supporting means takes the form of a trough mounted on a deck which is in turn mounted on springs on a vibrating frame.
The bed of particulate material is "fluidised" by the means for inducing particle-particle interaction in the absence of a fluidising agent. The extent of fluidisation of the bed can be controlled by controlling a number of variables including the nature of the vibratory motion, the angle of the vibratory motion with respect to the supporting means, the amplitude of the motion, the frequency of the motion and the depth of the bed with the variables preferably optimised for a given sample of particulate material. The extent of fluidisation of the bed is largely determined by the amplitude of the motion which is preferably sufficient to induce particle-particle interaction of the particulate material allowing stratification of the bed but not so large as to induce too strong interaction between particles which obviates stratification and hence separation. The frequency of the motion largely affects the speed of interaction between particles within the bed and the rate at which lower density particles migrate upwardly through the bed. The bed depth is preferably at least about 5 particle diameters which has been found to be sufficient to enable particle-particle interaction to be established with upward displacement of lower density particles . Particulate material may be separated by batch or continuous operation with continuous operation being preferred. The separation means can take a variety of forms. For example, material may be raked from the top of the bed; lower density material may be caused to flow over a weir or through an aperture; or, at an intermediate level in the bed lower density and higher density material may be caused to be separated by encountering a standard scrapper bar or cutter plate.
The supporting means may be disposed substantially horizontally or may be inclined at an angle of up to about 45° and the nature of the motion from linear through elliptical to circular may be selected to optimise particle-particle interaction within the bed.
Inclination of the supporting means may assist separation of lower density material by enabling the lower density particles to flow under gravity over a weir or through an aperture in a lowered bed wall once they have migrated to an upper portion of the bed. The angle of inclination is preferably variable. A separation enhancing agent such as water or ferrosilicon particles may be added to the bed to enhance separation.
Separation may be effected on a continuous basis with the apparatus preferably including feed means for introducing particulate material into the bed for continuous operation. The feed means preferably takes the form of a vibratory or belt feeder which may introduce particulate material at a point or as a curtain, preferably evenly across the width of the supporting means .
A plurality of beds may be arranged to be used in series in accordance with the present invention. For example, particulate material separated from a first bed may be introduced to another bed arranged to provide either improved separation at the same density or further separation at a different density. It will therefore be appreciated that an apparatus according to the present invention can be used to separate a feed of particulate material into various fractions with the densities of the particles in the various fractions being variable.
Preferred embodiments of the present invention will now be described by way of example. Example 1
A batch test was conducted on a sample of iron ore in a rectangular trough 340mm wide by 260mm long by 60mm deep and mounted horizontally on a vibrating table in the form of a modified General Kinematics screen deck. The screen deck was modified by replacing the screens with the trough. The size range of the feed material was 13- 22mm. The test was conducted on an 8.3kg sample containing 4.6% gangue (SG<3.5) which formed a 50mm deep bed. The vibratory motion imparted to the trough was a linear reciprocating motion which was imparted at an angle of 30° to the horizontal at a frequency of 50 Hz and an amplitude of 1mm. Particle-particle ' interactions were established in the bed resulting in fluidisation caused by the vibratory motion. Gangue migrated to the surface of the bed and accumulated in one corner from which it was manually collected and hence separated from the higher density particles (SG: 4.3-4.65). Notwithstanding that the trough was mounted substantially horizontally, the nature and angle of the vibratory motion to horizontal resulted in inclination of the upper surface of the bed. Approximately 90% of the gangue was separated from the feed material in approximately one minute . Example 2
A batch test was conducted on a sample of iron ore in the trough of Example 1 which was mounted on a modified Denver-Dillon screen deck at an inclination of about 8° to the horizontal. The screen deck was modified by replacing the screens with the trough. The 260mm sides of the trough were inclined at 8° with one of the 340mm rims being elevated with respect to the other of the 340mm rims. The size range of the feed material was 13-22mm. The test was conducted on an 8.0kg sample containing 6.4% gangue (SG<3.5). The vibratory motion imparted to the trough was circular with the plane of the motion substantially normal to the 340 rims of the trough at a frequency of 50Hz and an amplitude of 2mm. The circular vibratory motion was imparted by a variable speed motor driving a pair of standard out of balance flywheels connected by a drive shaft. Particle-particle interactions were established in the bed resulting in fluidisation caused by the vibratory motion. Gangue migrated to the surface of the bed and accumulated in one of the lower corners from which it was manually collected and hence separated from the higher density particles (SG: 4.3-4.65). Approximately 80% of the gangue was separated from the feed material in approximately 2 minutes. Example 3
A continuous test was conducted on a sample of iron ore (13 -22mm) in a rectangular trough 300mm wide by 705mm long by 300mm deep and mounted horizontally on the screen deck of Example 2. The sample was continuously fed from a vibratory feeder to a point adjacent a corner of the trough at a feed rate of 700kg per hour. One of the longer walls was formed with a tail aperture for removal of lower density (tail) material. The aperture was rectangular, centrally located in the longer wall, 390mm wide, and extended from the upper edge of the longer wall to a maximum depth of 280mm. The size of the aperture was adjustable by raising and lowering a sliding gate; the upper edge of which formed the lower edge of the aperture. The width of the aperture was also adjustable. Throughout the example the gate was positioned such that the tail aperture was 390mm wide by 170mm deep. A product aperture for removal of higher density (product) material was formed in the other of the longer walls . The product aperture was located in the bottom corner of the longer wall remote from the corner at which the product was fed to the trough and was of adjustable size by provision of a sliding gate. The product aperture was in the form of a quadrant of radius 70mm. Throughout the example the gate was positioned such that the product aperture was wide open. The vibratory motion imparted to the trough was elliptical with the plane of the motion substantially normal to the long sides of the trough at a frequency of 50Hz and an amplitude of l-2mm. The elliptical vibratory motion was imparted by a variable speed motor driving a pair of standard out of balance flywheels connected by a drive shaft with the screen deck weighted to modify the circular motion which would otherwise be induced. Particle-particle interactions were established in the bed resulting in fluidisation caused by the vibratory motion with lower SG material continuously collected from the tail aperture and higher SG material continuously collected from the product aperture .
Good upgrading was achieved yielding a product of 64.9% FeT0TAL, 3.25% Si02 and 1.06% Al203 from a feed of 64.3% Fe, 3.67% Si02 and 1.31% Al203 (Table 1). This product assay is close to the theoretical maximum as established from heavy liquid analysis of 65.5% FeT0TAL, 2.69% Si02 and 0.98% Al203 for 82% recovery (Table 2). Table 1 Quantitative Result Assay of Feed, Product and Tail
Figure imgf000010_0001
Table 2 Theoretical calculated assay based on removal of the gangue (SG<3.3)
Figure imgf000010_0002
Example 4
A continuous test was conducted on a sample of iron ore (6-30mm) in a rectangular trough 300mm wide by 600mm long by 300mm deep and mounted horizontally on the screen deck of Example 2. The sample was continuously fed from a vibratory feeder to the middle of the trough as curtain between the long sides of the trough and substantially parallel to the short sides of the trough at a feed rate of 500kg per hour. One of the longer wall-s was formed with a tail aperture for removal of lower density (tail) material. The aperture was rectangular, located adjacent a corner of the trough, 100mm wide, and extended from the upper edge of the longer wall to a maximum depth of 280mm. The size of the aperture was adjustable by raising and lowering a sliding gate; the upper edge of which formed the lower edge of the aperture. Throughout the example the gate was positioned such that the tail aperture was 100mm wide by 165mm deep. A triangular product aperture for removal of higher density (product) material was formed in the same longer wall as the tail aperture. The product aperture was located in the bottom of the longer wall adjacent the corner remote from the tail aperture and was of adjustable size by provision of a sliding gate. Throughout the example the gate was positioned such that the product aperture was a right angle triangle having a base of 100mm and a height of 120mm. The vibratory motion imparted to the trough was elliptical with the plane of the motion substantially normal to the long sides of the trough at a frequency of 70Hz and an amplitude of 0.5-lmm. The elliptical vibratory motion was imparted by a variable speed motor driving a pair of standard out of balance flywheels connected by a drive shaft with the screen deck weighted to modify the circular motion which would otherwise be induced. Particle-particle interactions were established in the bed resulting in fluidisation caused by the vibratory motion with lower SG material continuously collected from the tail aperture and higher SG material continuously collected from the product aperture.
The quantitative results for the total lump sample of iron ore indicated good ore recovery of 88%, with some upgrading of the feed (64.3% FeT0TAL, 3.46% Si02 and 1.36%
Al203) to the product (64.5% FeT0TAL, 3.11 Si02 and 1.26% Al203) being achieved (Table 3). Table 3. Quantitative Result - Assay of Product and
Tail
Figure imgf000011_0001
Example 5 A batch test was conducted on a 60g sample of a mixture of 75% by weight magnetite of SG 5.5 and 25% by weight silica of SG 2.65 in the rectangular trough of Example 1 mounted horizontally on the screen deck of Example 2 with a 3mm bed depth. The size range of the feed material was 100-300μm. The primary vibratory motion imparted to the trough was elliptical with the plane of the motion substantially normal to the long sides of the trough at a frequency of 50 Hz and an amplitude of 1mm. The elliptical vibratory motion was imparted by a variable speed motor driving a pair of standard out of balance flywheels connected by a drive shaft with the screen deck weighted to modify the circular motion which would otherwise be induced. A secondary linear reciprocating vibratory motion was also imparted to the trough. The secondary motion was a vertical motion at a frequency of 50 Hz and an amplitude of 1.5mm. Particle-particle interactions were established in the bed resulting in fluidisation caused by the vibratory motions. Two distinct bands were formed in the trough; the lower band (high SG) contained 95% by weight magnetite and 5% by weight silica and the upper band (low SG) contained 82% by weight magnetite and 38% by weight silica.

Claims

1. An apparatus for separating particulate material, the apparatus including: supporting means for supporting a bed of the particulate material, means for inducing particle-particle interaction of particulate material in the bed whereby lower density particulate material migrates towards the top of the bed, and separation means for separating at least a portion of said lower density material from an upper portion of the bed.
2. An apparatus as claimed in claim 1 wherein the means for inducing particle-particle interaction comprises means for inducing vibratory motion of the supporting means .
3. An apparatus as claimed in claim 2 wherein the means for inducing vibratory motion comprises means for inducing a linear reciprocating motion.
4. An apparatus as claimed in claim 2 wherein the means for inducing vibratory motion comprises means for inducing a circular or elliptical motion.
5. An apparatus as claimed in claim 2 wherein the means for inducing vibratory motion comprises means for inducing a circular or elliptical motion and means for inducing a linear reciprocating motion.
6. An apparatus as claimed in any one of claims 2-5 wherein the supporting means comprising a trough mounted on a frame arranged to be vibrated.
7. An apparatus as claimed in any one of claims 2-6 wherein the amplitude and frequency of the vibratory motion are variable.
8. An apparatus as claimed in any one of the preceding claims wherein the separation means is arranged for continuous separation of said lower density material and the apparatus further includes feed means for continuously introducing particulate material into the bed.
9. An apparatus as claimed in claim 8 wherein the feed means comprises a vibratory or belt feeder.
10. An apparatus as claimed in any one of the preceding claims wherein the separation means comprises a weir over which said lower density material flows in use or an aperture through which said lower density material flows in use.
11. An apparatus as claimed in any one of the preceding claims having a plurality of beds arranged in series whereby particulate material separated from one of the beds can be introduced into another of the beds for further separation.
12. A method for separating particulate material, the method including the steps of: forming a bed of the particulate material, inducing particle-particle interaction of particulate material in the bed whereby lower density particulate material migrates towards the top of the bed, and separating at least a portion of said lower density material from an upper portion of the bed.
13. A method as claimed in claim 12 wherein the bed is of a depth greater than 5 particle diameters .
14. A method as claimed in claim 12 or claim 13 which utilises an apparatus as claimed in any one of claims 1-11.
15. A method as claimed in any one of claims 12-14 wherein the particulate material is an ore.
PCT/AU1998/000470 1997-06-20 1998-06-18 Particulate material separation WO1998058750A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU78985/98A AU7898598A (en) 1997-06-20 1998-06-18 Particulate material separation

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AUPO7489A AUPO748997A0 (en) 1997-06-20 1997-06-20 Particulate material separation
AUPO7489 1997-06-20

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO1998058750A1 true WO1998058750A1 (en) 1998-12-30

Family

ID=3801780

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/AU1998/000470 WO1998058750A1 (en) 1997-06-20 1998-06-18 Particulate material separation

Country Status (3)

Country Link
AU (1) AUPO748997A0 (en)
WO (1) WO1998058750A1 (en)
ZA (1) ZA985361B (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2002094445A1 (en) * 2001-05-18 2002-11-28 Horstmann Gmbh & Co. Kg Separating device for sorting a mixture of materials
WO2009144031A2 (en) * 2008-05-30 2009-12-03 Eppendorf Ag Apparatus and method for moving particles in a fluid

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
AU1472433A (en) * 1933-10-12 1934-05-10 Felix Johan Tromp An improved apparatus and process forthe concentration and/or sizing of mineral particles
US4206046A (en) * 1975-02-24 1980-06-03 Haight William J Process and apparatus for separating particles by relative density
US4260482A (en) * 1979-09-24 1981-04-07 Aragon Paul D Two stage gravity method of concentration of fine dry materials
US4688679A (en) * 1985-09-16 1987-08-25 Lindgren Peter B Impact separator

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
AU1472433A (en) * 1933-10-12 1934-05-10 Felix Johan Tromp An improved apparatus and process forthe concentration and/or sizing of mineral particles
AU698246A (en) * 1946-09-30 1947-08-28 Francis emerson Improvements in or relating to apparatus for treatment of ores or other mineral substances by dry process for the classification, concentration, or separation for recovery of their valuable constituents
US4206046A (en) * 1975-02-24 1980-06-03 Haight William J Process and apparatus for separating particles by relative density
US4260482A (en) * 1979-09-24 1981-04-07 Aragon Paul D Two stage gravity method of concentration of fine dry materials
US4688679A (en) * 1985-09-16 1987-08-25 Lindgren Peter B Impact separator

Non-Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
DERWENT ABSTRACTS, Accession No. 75-K4789W/38, Class P43; & SU,A,446 323 (AGRIFORM INT. CHEM. INC.) 11 April 1975. *
DERWENT ABSTRACTS, Accession No. 86-086479/13; & SU,A,1 176 977 (CELLULOSE ENG. RES.) 7 September 1985. *
DERWENT ABSTRACTS, Accession No. 87-311939/44, Class P12; & SE,A,86 01120 (JOHANSSON) 12 September 1987. *
DERWENT ABSTRACTS, Accession No. 88-146054/21, Class P43; & SU,A,1 348 002 (GORSK AGRIC. INST.) 30 October 1987. *
DERWENT ABSTRACTS, Accession No. 96-155486/16, Class P43; & JP,A,08 039 005 (TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK) 13 February 1996. *

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2002094445A1 (en) * 2001-05-18 2002-11-28 Horstmann Gmbh & Co. Kg Separating device for sorting a mixture of materials
WO2009144031A2 (en) * 2008-05-30 2009-12-03 Eppendorf Ag Apparatus and method for moving particles in a fluid
WO2009144031A3 (en) * 2008-05-30 2010-03-04 Eppendorf Ag Apparatus and method for moving particles in a fluid

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AUPO748997A0 (en) 1997-07-17
ZA985361B (en) 1999-03-16

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7708145B2 (en) Dry separating table, a separator and equipment for the compound dry separation with this table
US5996808A (en) Fly ash processing using inclined fluidized bed and sound wave agitation
CN109772576B (en) Method for fully utilizing gold tailings
US3096277A (en) Electrostatic separator
WO1998058750A1 (en) Particulate material separation
US3105040A (en) Method and apparatus for separating intermixed divided materials
Gill et al. Gravity concentration
AU7898598A (en) Particulate material separation
US4109874A (en) Apparatus for mineral processing
AU2008200106A1 (en) Particulate material separation
JP2001518004A (en) Vibration sieving machine without mesh
US2279590A (en) Apparatus for separating particulate materials
US4857177A (en) Dry separation of solids
CN2162297Y (en) Rotary vibration type belt chute with weir
AU2005201037A1 (en) Particulate material separation
JP7193068B2 (en) Wet separation method and wet separation apparatus
Dodbiba et al. Air tabling—a dry gravity solid–solid separation technique
CN111889220B (en) Stepped jigger
US12240016B2 (en) Classifier and method of classifying
CN208960337U (en) A kind of biomass powder screening mechanism
US1941490A (en) Process and mechanism for separating intermixed divided materials
US2999596A (en) Method and apparatus for the segregation of particulate material
SU967574A1 (en) Magnetic separator
Mahmoodabadi Korean anthracite coal cleaning by means of dry and wet based separation technologies
SU1342527A1 (en) Laboratory vibrating mill

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY CA CH CN CU CZ DE DK EE ES FI GB GE GH GM GW HU ID IL IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MD MG MK MN MW MX NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT UA UG US UZ VN YU ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW SD SZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN ML MR NE SN TD TG

DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 78985/98

Country of ref document: AU

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: JP

Ref document number: 1999503414

Format of ref document f/p: F

REG Reference to national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: 8642

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase
NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: CA

点击 这是indexloc提供的php浏览器服务,不要输入任何密码和下载