+

USPP18246P3 - Raspberry cultivar ‘Cascade Bounty’ - Google Patents

Raspberry cultivar ‘Cascade Bounty’ Download PDF

Info

Publication number
USPP18246P3
USPP18246P3 US11/057,898 US5789805V USPP18246P3 US PP18246 P3 USPP18246 P3 US PP18246P3 US 5789805 V US5789805 V US 5789805V US PP18246 P3 USPP18246 P3 US PP18246P3
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
cascade
bounty
fruit
length
meeker
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime, expires
Application number
US11/057,898
Other versions
US20060185042P1 (en
Inventor
Patrick P. Moore
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Washington State University WSU
Original Assignee
Washington State University Research Foundation
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Washington State University Research Foundation filed Critical Washington State University Research Foundation
Priority to US11/057,898 priority Critical patent/USPP18246P3/en
Assigned to WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION reassignment WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: MOORE, PATRICK P.
Publication of US20060185042P1 publication Critical patent/US20060185042P1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of USPP18246P3 publication Critical patent/USPP18246P3/en
Assigned to WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY reassignment WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION
Adjusted expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A01AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
    • A01HNEW PLANTS OR NON-TRANSGENIC PROCESSES FOR OBTAINING THEM; PLANT REPRODUCTION BY TISSUE CULTURE TECHNIQUES
    • A01H6/00Angiosperms, i.e. flowering plants, characterised by their botanic taxonomy
    • A01H6/74Rosaceae, e.g. strawberry, apple, almonds, pear, rose, blackberries or raspberries
    • A01H6/7499Rubus, e.g. blackberries or raspberries
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A01AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
    • A01HNEW PLANTS OR NON-TRANSGENIC PROCESSES FOR OBTAINING THEM; PLANT REPRODUCTION BY TISSUE CULTURE TECHNIQUES
    • A01H5/00Angiosperms, i.e. flowering plants, characterised by their plant parts; Angiosperms characterised otherwise than by their botanic taxonomy
    • A01H5/08Fruits

Definitions

  • This invention relates to a new and distinct cultivar of raspberry plant with a botanical name of Rubus ideaus L., and the cultivar designation ‘Cascade Bounty’.
  • raspberry cultivars named ‘Lauren’, ‘Encore’, ‘Prelude,’ and ‘WSU 1090’ are described in U.S. Plant Pat. Nos. 10,610, 11,746, 11,747, and 14,522 respectively.
  • the parents of the new and distinct cultivar of the present invention are ‘Chief’ and WSU 984.
  • ‘Chief’ is a red raspberry cultivar released from the University of Minnesota in 1930. ‘Chief’ produces round, small to medium fruit that ripens early in the season. ‘Chief’ is highly root rot tolerant and very winter hardy.
  • WSU 984 is a red raspberry selection from the Washington State University breeding program. WSU 984 was highly productive, has long fruiting laterals and produces long conic light colored fruit.
  • ‘Cascade Bounty’ is distinguished primarily by its high productivity and high level of tolerance to root rot.
  • the fruit is rounded in shape and tart.
  • ‘Cascade Bounty’ is distinguished from its parent WSU 984 by having more rounded fruit, darker fruit color and more acidic fruit.
  • ‘Cascade Bounty’ is distinguished from its parent ‘Chief’ in having larger leaves with terminal, distal lateral and basal lateral leaflets all being longer and wider than Chief. ‘Cascade Bounty’ has larger fruit, more drupelets per fruit, greater drupelet weight, larger seeds, later harvest season and greater productivity than ‘Chief’.
  • ‘Boyne’ (non-patented) and ‘Killarney’ (non-patented) are red raspberry cultivars that also have ‘Chief’ as one of their parents.
  • ‘Cascade Bounty’ is distinguished from ‘Boyne’ by a longer petiole, greater length of terminal and basal lateral leaflets and sessile basal lateral leaflets for primocane leaves, larger fruit, more drupelets per fruit, larger drupelets, larger individual seed weight, lighter fruit color and a later harvest season.
  • ‘Cascade Bounty’ is distinguished from ‘Killarney’ by a longer petiole, longer leaflets and sessile basal lateral leaflets for primocane leaves, larger fruit, more drupelets per fruit, larger drupelets, larger individual seed weight, and a later harvest season.
  • ‘Cascade Bounty’ is distinguished from ‘Meeker’ (non-patented) in having sessile basal lateral leaflets, shorter and narrower basal lateral leaflets for primocane leaves, fewer drupelets per fruit, larger drupelets, larger seeds, more acidic fruit, more fruit per lateral, more fruit per fruiting node, and greater tolerance to root rot.
  • ‘Cascade Bounty’ is distinguished from ‘Cascade Delight’ (patented as WSU 1090, U.S. Plant Pat. No. 14,522) by in having sessile basal lateral leaflets, smaller leaflets on primocanes, lighter colored spines on the primocanes, greater total number of buds, flowers and developing fruit per lateral, node and fruiting nodes, greater number of fruit per lateral and fruit per fruiting node, smaller length to width ratio of fruit, fewer drupelets per fruit, smaller drupelets, smaller fruit, and greater tolerance to root rot.
  • ‘Cascade Bounty’ is distinguished from ‘Chilliwack’ (non-patented), ‘Comox’ (non-patented), ‘Cowichan’ (non-patented, ‘Encore’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 11,747), ‘Malahat’ (non-patented), ‘Tulameen’ (non-patented), and ‘Qualicum’ (non-patented) by having greater tolerance to root rot in a replicated yield planting on a site with severe root rot. ‘Cascade Bounty’ was very vigorous, while most or all of the plants of these cultivars died on this site.
  • FIG. 1 is a picture of the plant of ‘Cascade Bounty’, showing the growth habit of the plant, taken Jun. 23, 2004.
  • FIG. 2 is a photograph of a winter cane of ‘Cascade Bounty’, taken Feb. 3, 2004. The waxy bloom is rubbed off in one portion of the cane.
  • FIG. 3 is a photograph of a young primocane of ‘Cascade Bounty’, less than 30 cm tall grown in a greenhouse, taken Sep. 27, 2004, showing frequency and shape of spines.
  • FIG. 4 is a photograph of the upper surface of a leaf from a primocane of ‘Cascade Bounty’ taken Jun. 17, 2003.
  • FIG. 5 is a photograph of fruit and receptacle of ‘Cascade Bounty’, taken Jul. 7, 2004.
  • the seeds resulting from the controlled hybridization of ‘Chief’ ⁇ WSU 984 were germinated in a greenhouse during the winter of 1992-1993. Resulting seedlings were planted in the spring of 1993 at Puyallup, Wash. The seedlings fruited in 1995 and one, designated WSU 1162, was selected for its vigor on a poor site, bright uniform sized fruit, and apparent productivity.
  • Test plantings have shown this new variety to be adapted to all tested locations in western Washington. There has been no observed winter damage, but winter hardiness is unknown. Plants of the new variety have vigorous growth with long fruiting laterals.
  • the number of canes per hill, diameter, cane length, number of nodes, internode length, and color are given in comparison to ‘Meeker’ and ‘Cascade Delight’ in Table 1.
  • the planting with ‘Cascade Bounty’ and ‘Cascade Delight’ were planted in 2000. This site is highly infested with root rot and over 65% of the cultivars and selections in the planting dying from root rot within 4 years.
  • ‘Cascade Delight’ has some tolerance to root rot and was vigorous, ‘Meeker’ is susceptible to root rot and had collapsed by 2004. Data for ‘Meeker’ was collected from an adjacent planting established in 2001, where plants of ‘Meeker’ had not collapsed.
  • the cane color was much greener, Yellow-Green Group (145B). At about 30 cm in height the canes had 20-40 spines per cm of cane (FIG. 3 ). The distal portion of taller canes have fewer spines, smaller spines and the pigmentation at the basal spot and lower portions of the spine decrease.
  • the spine color is Greyed-Purple Group (186A). The spines are straight and pointed toward the base of the canes. There are pigmented spots at the base of the spine that are the same color as the spines. The spine color is similar to ‘Meeker’ and not as dark as ‘Cascade Delight’.
  • the spines at 30 cm of a plant grown in the greenhouse measured Sep. 27, 2004 were 2.4 mm long and the basal spot at the base of the spine was 0.9 mm.
  • the canes are glabrous.
  • the upper surface of the leaves is glabrous with some pubescence at the leaf margin.
  • the leaves are pubescent on the lower surface.
  • the leaflets are generally flat in cross-section.
  • the petioles are pubescent and also have spines that are similar (but smaller) to those on the canes.
  • the petioles of ‘Cascade Bounty’ are longer than ‘Boyne’, ‘Chief’ and ‘Killarney’.
  • the length of the terminal leaflet and basal lateral leaflet of ‘Boyne’ were less than ‘Cascade Bounty’.
  • the leaves of ‘Cascade Delight’ are larger than ‘Cascade Bounty’, the length and width of the terminal, distal lateral and width of the basal lateral leaflets.
  • the leaves of ‘Chief’ are smaller than ‘Cascade Bounty’, the length and width of all leaflets.
  • the leaflets of ‘Killarney’ were shorter than the leaflets of ‘Cascade Bounty’.
  • the leaves of ‘Meeker’ were generally similar is size to ‘Cascade Bounty’, except the basal lateral leaflets of ‘Meeker’ were shorter and narrower than ‘Cascade Bounty’.
  • the primocane leaves of ‘Cascade Bounty’ are pinnately compound with 5 leaflets (FIG. 4 ).
  • the leaves have 2 stipules.
  • the distal lateral leaflets and the terminal leaflet overlap slightly.
  • the leaflets are doubly serrated.
  • the leaflets are generally ovate.
  • the tips of all leaflets are acuminate to acute.
  • the base of the terminal leaflet is rounded to cordate.
  • the basal lateral leaflets are sessile and the bases are rounded and relatively symmetrical.
  • the distal lateral leaflets are sessile with asymmetrical leaf bases.
  • the basal lateral leaflets for ‘Cascade Bounty’ and ‘Chief’ were sessile, while ‘Boyne’, ‘Cascade Delight’, ‘Killarney’ and ‘Meeker’ had petioles over 1 mm.
  • the floricane leaves have 3 leaflets that do not overlap.
  • the leaves have 3 leaflets and 2 stipules.
  • the leaflets are generally ovate.
  • the leaflet tips are acuminate to acute.
  • the leaf bases for the terminal leaflet is cordate and the lateral leaflets are rounded.
  • Fruit of this variety ripens late in the season, with the midpoint of harvest averaging July 12 and the length of the fruiting season averaging 27 days at Puyallup, Wash.
  • the midpoint of harvest for ‘Meeker’ averaged July 13 with 23.5 days for the length of the fruiting season.
  • Fruit production has not been observed on primocanes.
  • the fruit is medium sized, averaging 3.4 over the season. Early in the fruiting season, fruit was much larger, averaging 5.29 g on Jun. 25, 2004.
  • the flowers are perfect with generally 5 sepals, 5 petals and numerous stamens (approximately 90, same as ‘Cascade Delight’) and pistils (approximately 85 based on the number of developed drupelets).
  • the flowers are self-fertile.
  • the flowering trusses are cymose in elongate clusters and at each node on the fruiting lateral the flowers are predominantly borne singly, or sometimes in clusters of two or more.
  • the flowers have no discernable fragrance.
  • the pedicel length, number of fruit and number of fruiting nodes are given in Table 5. The pedicel length was similar in ‘Cascade Bounty’, ‘Cascade Delight’ and ‘Meeker’.
  • ‘Cascade Bounty’ had more fruit per lateral and number of fruit per fruiting node than ‘Cascade Delight’ and ‘Meeker’. Differences between the number of flowers (Table 4) and number of fruit (Table 5) are within sampling errors.
  • Fruit morphological characteristics are given in Table 6.
  • Fruit is round in shape and glossy (FIG. 5 ).
  • the width of the fruit of ‘Boyne’ and ‘Chief’ was greater than their length.
  • the length of the fruit of ‘Cascade Delight’ was greater than its width.
  • the length and width of the fruit were similar for ‘Cascade Bounty’ and ‘Killarney’ and ‘Meeker’.
  • the number of drupelets per fruit for ‘Cascade Bounty’ was less than for ‘Cascade Delight’ and ‘Meeker’ and more than ‘Boyne’, ‘Chief’ and ‘Killarney’.
  • the drupelet weight of ‘Cascade Bounty’ was less than ‘Cascade Delight’ but greater than ‘Boyne’, ‘Chief’, ‘Killarney’ and ‘Meeker’.
  • the individual seed weight of ‘Cascade Bounty’ was greater than the five cultivars it was compared with.
  • Fruit of WSU 984 (one of the parents of ‘Cascade Bounty’) is not available, but in 1994, the shape of its fruit was conic to long conic with the length/width ratio of 1.4 (range 1.2 to 1.6). This is much greater than the length/width ratio of 1.07 for ‘Cascade Bounty’.
  • the Munsell color value for fruit of WSU 984 in a 1994 sample was 6R3/6. This is much lighter than ‘Cascade Bounty’.
  • Fruit of ‘Cascade Bounty’ is tart, but with a good raspberry flavor.
  • the pH, titratable acidity, soluble solids and anthocyanin concentration of processing ripe fruit are given in Table 7. Soluble solids content and pH of ‘Cascade Bounty’ fruit did not differ from ‘Willamette’.
  • the titratable aciditiy of ‘Cascade Bounty’ did not differ from ‘Cascade Delight’.
  • the anthocyanin content of ‘Cascade Bounty’ fruit did not differ from ‘Meeker’.
  • WSU 984 one of the parents of ‘Cascade Bounty’ was included in analyses in 1992.
  • the anthocyanin concentration for WSU 984 was low, 56% of the value of ‘Meeker’ fruit harvested that same year in the same planting. In the 2003 comparison, the anthocyanin concentration of ‘Cascade Bounty’ was over 90% of the value of ‘Meeker’.
  • ‘Cascade Bounty’ probably is not well suited to fresh market use. Therefore, fruit of ‘Cascade Bounty’ were not evaluated for post-harvest storage.
  • Fruit weight of ‘Cascade Bounty’ was similar to ‘Meeker’ in both plantings and both were smaller than ‘Cascade Delight’. Fruit firmness for ‘Cascade Bounty’ was similar to ‘Meeker’ in both years. The 5%, 50% and 95% harvest dates were similar for ‘Cascade Bounty’ and ‘Cascade Delight’ and ‘Meeker’ (except for the date of 95% of harvest in 2003 for ‘Meeker’). ‘Cascade Bounty’ was also subjectively evaluated in plots established in 2003 that were machine harvested at Burlington, Wash. ‘Cascade Bounty’ machine harvested acceptably for bulk frozen, puree or juice uses. There was some broken fruit and soft fruit, so it may not be suitable for IQF fruit (Individually Quick Frozen fruit).
  • ‘Cascade Bounty’ is susceptible to the large raspberry aphid ( Amphorophora agathonica ) the vector for the mosaic virus complex. It appears to be susceptible to raspberry bushy dwarf virus (RBDV) via pollen transmission. In unsprayed plots, the canes had some spur blight ( Didymella applanata [Niessl] Sacc.) infections, but with a low incidence. ‘Cascade Bounty’ has been planted in areas with high levels of root rot ( Phytophthora fragariae var. rubi, Wilcox & Duncan) and has had high yields with vigorous plants. ‘Cascade Bounty’ appears to have high levels of root rot tolerance.

Landscapes

  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Physiology (AREA)
  • Botany (AREA)
  • Developmental Biology & Embryology (AREA)
  • Environmental Sciences (AREA)
  • Natural Medicines & Medicinal Plants (AREA)
  • Pretreatment Of Seeds And Plants (AREA)

Abstract

A new and distinct cultivar of raspberry (i.e., Rubus idaeus L.). The cultivar forms medium sized, medium colored, tart flavored fruit. The fruit is round in shape with similar length and width. Based on trials on root rot infested soil, the cultivar appears to be highly tolerant of root rot, producing very high yields on these sites.

Description

GOVERNMENT INTERESTS
The invention was made in part with Federal formula funds pursuant to the Hatch Act and was part of Project WNP00640. The United States Government has certain rights in the invention.
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to a new and distinct cultivar of raspberry plant with a botanical name of Rubus ideaus L., and the cultivar designation ‘Cascade Bounty’.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Many cultivars of raspberry plant are known. For instance, raspberry cultivars named ‘Lauren’, ‘Encore’, ‘Prelude,’ and ‘WSU 1090’ are described in U.S. Plant Pat. Nos. 10,610, 11,746, 11,747, and 14,522 respectively. The parents of the new and distinct cultivar of the present invention are ‘Chief’ and WSU 984.
The instant plant, Cascade Bounty, originated from a hand-pollinated cross of WSU 984 (non-patented), the female parent, × ‘Chief″ (non-patented), the male parent, made in 1992 at Washington State University Puyallup Research and Extension Center, Puyallup Wash. ‘Chief’ is a red raspberry cultivar released from the University of Minnesota in 1930. ‘Chief’ produces round, small to medium fruit that ripens early in the season. ‘Chief’ is highly root rot tolerant and very winter hardy. WSU 984 is a red raspberry selection from the Washington State University breeding program. WSU 984 was highly productive, has long fruiting laterals and produces long conic light colored fruit.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
‘Cascade Bounty’ is distinguished primarily by its high productivity and high level of tolerance to root rot. The fruit is rounded in shape and tart.
‘Cascade Bounty’ is distinguished from its parent WSU 984 by having more rounded fruit, darker fruit color and more acidic fruit.
‘Cascade Bounty’ is distinguished from its parent ‘Chief’ in having larger leaves with terminal, distal lateral and basal lateral leaflets all being longer and wider than Chief. ‘Cascade Bounty’ has larger fruit, more drupelets per fruit, greater drupelet weight, larger seeds, later harvest season and greater productivity than ‘Chief’.
‘Boyne’ (non-patented) and ‘Killarney’ (non-patented) are red raspberry cultivars that also have ‘Chief’ as one of their parents. ‘Cascade Bounty’ is distinguished from ‘Boyne’ by a longer petiole, greater length of terminal and basal lateral leaflets and sessile basal lateral leaflets for primocane leaves, larger fruit, more drupelets per fruit, larger drupelets, larger individual seed weight, lighter fruit color and a later harvest season. ‘Cascade Bounty’ is distinguished from ‘Killarney’ by a longer petiole, longer leaflets and sessile basal lateral leaflets for primocane leaves, larger fruit, more drupelets per fruit, larger drupelets, larger individual seed weight, and a later harvest season.
‘Cascade Bounty’ is distinguished from ‘Meeker’ (non-patented) in having sessile basal lateral leaflets, shorter and narrower basal lateral leaflets for primocane leaves, fewer drupelets per fruit, larger drupelets, larger seeds, more acidic fruit, more fruit per lateral, more fruit per fruiting node, and greater tolerance to root rot.
‘Cascade Bounty’ is distinguished from ‘Cascade Delight’ (patented as WSU 1090, U.S. Plant Pat. No. 14,522) by in having sessile basal lateral leaflets, smaller leaflets on primocanes, lighter colored spines on the primocanes, greater total number of buds, flowers and developing fruit per lateral, node and fruiting nodes, greater number of fruit per lateral and fruit per fruiting node, smaller length to width ratio of fruit, fewer drupelets per fruit, smaller drupelets, smaller fruit, and greater tolerance to root rot.
‘Cascade Bounty’ is distinguished from ‘Chilliwack’ (non-patented), ‘Comox’ (non-patented), ‘Cowichan’ (non-patented, ‘Encore’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 11,747), ‘Malahat’ (non-patented), ‘Tulameen’ (non-patented), and ‘Qualicum’ (non-patented) by having greater tolerance to root rot in a replicated yield planting on a site with severe root rot. ‘Cascade Bounty’ was very vigorous, while most or all of the plants of these cultivars died on this site.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The accompanying photographs show typical specimens of the new cultivar, in color as nearly true as it is reasonably possible to make in color illustrations of this character. Photographs are intended to show morphological features of the plant.
FIG. 1 is a picture of the plant of ‘Cascade Bounty’, showing the growth habit of the plant, taken Jun. 23, 2004.
FIG. 2 is a photograph of a winter cane of ‘Cascade Bounty’, taken Feb. 3, 2004. The waxy bloom is rubbed off in one portion of the cane.
FIG. 3 is a photograph of a young primocane of ‘Cascade Bounty’, less than 30 cm tall grown in a greenhouse, taken Sep. 27, 2004, showing frequency and shape of spines.
FIG. 4 is a photograph of the upper surface of a leaf from a primocane of ‘Cascade Bounty’ taken Jun. 17, 2003.
FIG. 5 is a photograph of fruit and receptacle of ‘Cascade Bounty’, taken Jul. 7, 2004.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
History and Growth
The seeds resulting from the controlled hybridization of ‘Chief’×WSU 984 were germinated in a greenhouse during the winter of 1992-1993. Resulting seedlings were planted in the spring of 1993 at Puyallup, Wash. The seedlings fruited in 1995 and one, designated WSU 1162, was selected for its vigor on a poor site, bright uniform sized fruit, and apparent productivity.
During 1995-1996, the original plant selection was propagated asexually in a greenhouse at Puyallup, Wash., by rooting cuttings derived from root material. A replicated planting of four replications of three plants each was established in spring 1996 at Puyallup, Wash. Subsequently, additional test plantings were established from asexually propagated plants that were propagated from root cuttings or micropropagated using meristem cultures from axillary buds of primocanes. Plantings were established in Puyallup and Burlington, Wash. All asexually propagated plants have been observed to be true to type during all asexual multiplication and the vegetative and fruit characteristics of the original plants have been maintained. Plants fruited in the second or third season of growth after planting.
Test plantings have shown this new variety to be adapted to all tested locations in western Washington. There has been no observed winter damage, but winter hardiness is unknown. Plants of the new variety have vigorous growth with long fruiting laterals.
Measurements
When objects could be accurately measured with an 8 mm diameter measuring opening (leaves and fruit), color was measured with a Minolta Chroma Meter CR-200b, which measure color in L*, a*, b* color coordinates. Calibration was performed using a standard white plate supplied by the manufacturer. These L*, a*, b* coordinates were converted and presented in Munsell color notation. For all the other color measurements, color was compared with Royal Horticultural Society Colour Chart color plates and presented as Royal Horticultural Society Colour Chart designations.
The descriptions reported herein are from specimens grown at Puyallup, Wash., unless otherwise noted.
Size
The number of canes per hill, diameter, cane length, number of nodes, internode length, and color are given in comparison to ‘Meeker’ and ‘Cascade Delight’ in Table 1. The planting with ‘Cascade Bounty’ and ‘Cascade Delight’ were planted in 2000. This site is highly infested with root rot and over 65% of the cultivars and selections in the planting dying from root rot within 4 years. ‘Cascade Delight’ has some tolerance to root rot and was vigorous, ‘Meeker’ is susceptible to root rot and had collapsed by 2004. Data for ‘Meeker’ was collected from an adjacent planting established in 2001, where plants of ‘Meeker’ had not collapsed. Even in the 2000 planting, ‘Cascade Bounty’ produced many canes and was very vigorous (FIG. 1). Plants have been grown in the hill system with 10-12 canes retained per hill and the primocanes pruned to 1.2 m in winter. The following summer, fruiting plots were 175 cm tall with a width of 130 cm.
Canes
Primocane emergence was similar for ‘Cascade Bounty’ and ‘Cascade Delight’ and occurred approximately Mar. 15, 2004. Bud break for ‘Cascade Bounty’ and for ‘Cascade Delight’ was Feb. 23, 2004. When the floricanes were observed Mar. 17, 2003 there were high levels of waxy bloom on the canes making the canes appear Greyed Purple group (186A). The color of the canes depended on the amount of wax on the canes. When the wax was rubbed off the color of the canes was Greyed Orange group (166B). The color of the bud scales were Greyed Purple group (183A). The midwinter color of canes is shown in FIG. 2. In midsummer (Jul. 16, 2004) the cane color was much greener, Yellow-Green Group (145B). At about 30 cm in height the canes had 20-40 spines per cm of cane (FIG. 3). The distal portion of taller canes have fewer spines, smaller spines and the pigmentation at the basal spot and lower portions of the spine decrease. The spine color is Greyed-Purple Group (186A). The spines are straight and pointed toward the base of the canes. There are pigmented spots at the base of the spine that are the same color as the spines. The spine color is similar to ‘Meeker’ and not as dark as ‘Cascade Delight’. The spines at 30 cm of a plant grown in the greenhouse measured Sep. 27, 2004 were 2.4 mm long and the basal spot at the base of the spine was 0.9 mm. The canes are glabrous.
Leaves
The upper surface of the leaves is glabrous with some pubescence at the leaf margin. The leaves are pubescent on the lower surface. The leaflets are generally flat in cross-section. The petioles are pubescent and also have spines that are similar (but smaller) to those on the canes.
Characteristics of primocane leaves are given in Table 2. The petioles of ‘Cascade Bounty’ are longer than ‘Boyne’, ‘Chief’ and ‘Killarney’. The length of the terminal leaflet and basal lateral leaflet of ‘Boyne’ were less than ‘Cascade Bounty’. The leaves of ‘Cascade Delight’ are larger than ‘Cascade Bounty’, the length and width of the terminal, distal lateral and width of the basal lateral leaflets. The leaves of ‘Chief’ are smaller than ‘Cascade Bounty’, the length and width of all leaflets. The leaflets of ‘Killarney’ were shorter than the leaflets of ‘Cascade Bounty’. The leaves of ‘Meeker’ were generally similar is size to ‘Cascade Bounty’, except the basal lateral leaflets of ‘Meeker’ were shorter and narrower than ‘Cascade Bounty’.
The primocane leaves of ‘Cascade Bounty’ are pinnately compound with 5 leaflets (FIG. 4). The leaves have 2 stipules. The distal lateral leaflets and the terminal leaflet overlap slightly. The leaflets are doubly serrated. The leaflets are generally ovate. The tips of all leaflets are acuminate to acute. The base of the terminal leaflet is rounded to cordate. The basal lateral leaflets are sessile and the bases are rounded and relatively symmetrical. The distal lateral leaflets are sessile with asymmetrical leaf bases.
Characteristics of floricane leaves are given in Table 3. There were few differences among cultivars for floricane leaf measurements. The basal lateral leaflets for ‘Cascade Bounty’ and ‘Chief’ were sessile, while ‘Boyne’, ‘Cascade Delight’, ‘Killarney’ and ‘Meeker’ had petioles over 1 mm. The floricane leaves have 3 leaflets that do not overlap. The leaves have 3 leaflets and 2 stipules. The leaflets are generally ovate. The leaflet tips are acuminate to acute. The leaf bases for the terminal leaflet is cordate and the lateral leaflets are rounded.
Flowers and fruit
Fruit of this variety ripens late in the season, with the midpoint of harvest averaging July 12 and the length of the fruiting season averaging 27 days at Puyallup, Wash. The midpoint of harvest for ‘Meeker’ averaged July 13 with 23.5 days for the length of the fruiting season. Fruit production has not been observed on primocanes. Fruit releases easily from the receptacle. The fruit is medium sized, averaging 3.4 over the season. Early in the fruiting season, fruit was much larger, averaging 5.29 g on Jun. 25, 2004.
Although variable from year to year and among locations, May 6, 2004 was the date for the first open flowers of ‘Cascade Bounty’ at Puyallup, Wash., the same as for ‘Cascade Delight’. The lateral length, number of nodes, number of flowers, flower diameter and color are given in Table 4. ‘Cascade Bounty’ had a greater total number of buds, flowers and developing fruit per lateral, node, and fruiting node than ‘Cascade Delight’. Flower morphology is typical of most red raspberry cultivars and is not useful to identify ‘Cascade Bounty’. The petals are White Group (155A), sepals Yellow-Green Group (147C) and pedicels Greyed-Purple Group (184A). The flowers are perfect with generally 5 sepals, 5 petals and numerous stamens (approximately 90, same as ‘Cascade Delight’) and pistils (approximately 85 based on the number of developed drupelets). The flowers are self-fertile. The flowering trusses are cymose in elongate clusters and at each node on the fruiting lateral the flowers are predominantly borne singly, or sometimes in clusters of two or more. The flowers have no discernable fragrance. The pedicel length, number of fruit and number of fruiting nodes are given in Table 5. The pedicel length was similar in ‘Cascade Bounty’, ‘Cascade Delight’ and ‘Meeker’. ‘Cascade Bounty’ had more fruit per lateral and number of fruit per fruiting node than ‘Cascade Delight’ and ‘Meeker’. Differences between the number of flowers (Table 4) and number of fruit (Table 5) are within sampling errors.
Fruit morphological characteristics are given in Table 6. Fruit is round in shape and glossy (FIG. 5). The width of the fruit of ‘Boyne’ and ‘Chief’ was greater than their length. The length of the fruit of ‘Cascade Delight’ was greater than its width. The length and width of the fruit were similar for ‘Cascade Bounty’ and ‘Killarney’ and ‘Meeker’. The number of drupelets per fruit for ‘Cascade Bounty’ was less than for ‘Cascade Delight’ and ‘Meeker’ and more than ‘Boyne’, ‘Chief’ and ‘Killarney’. The drupelet weight of ‘Cascade Bounty’ was less than ‘Cascade Delight’ but greater than ‘Boyne’, ‘Chief’, ‘Killarney’ and ‘Meeker’. The individual seed weight of ‘Cascade Bounty’ was greater than the five cultivars it was compared with. Fruit of WSU 984 (one of the parents of ‘Cascade Bounty’) is not available, but in 1994, the shape of its fruit was conic to long conic with the length/width ratio of 1.4 (range 1.2 to 1.6). This is much greater than the length/width ratio of 1.07 for ‘Cascade Bounty’. The Munsell color value for fruit of WSU 984 in a 1994 sample was 6R3/6. This is much lighter than ‘Cascade Bounty’.
Fruit of ‘Cascade Bounty’ is tart, but with a good raspberry flavor. The pH, titratable acidity, soluble solids and anthocyanin concentration of processing ripe fruit are given in Table 7. Soluble solids content and pH of ‘Cascade Bounty’ fruit did not differ from ‘Willamette’. The titratable aciditiy of ‘Cascade Bounty’ did not differ from ‘Cascade Delight’. The anthocyanin content of ‘Cascade Bounty’ fruit did not differ from ‘Meeker’. Although not analyzed in 2004, the fruit of WSU 984 (one of the parents of ‘Cascade Bounty’) was included in analyses in 1992. The anthocyanin concentration for WSU 984 was low, 56% of the value of ‘Meeker’ fruit harvested that same year in the same planting. In the 2003 comparison, the anthocyanin concentration of ‘Cascade Bounty’ was over 90% of the value of ‘Meeker’.
Because of the fruit acidity, size and firmness, ‘Cascade Bounty’ probably is not well suited to fresh market use. Therefore, fruit of ‘Cascade Bounty’ were not evaluated for post-harvest storage.
Fruit production was measured in two plantings replicated plots at Puyallup that were hand harvested. Both plantings were on sites with high levels of root rot. In the planting established in 1996, ‘Cascade Bounty’ was compared to ‘Comox’, ‘Encore’, ‘Malahat’, ‘Meeker’, ‘Tulameen’ and ‘Willamette’ (Table 8). ‘Cascade Bounty’ had the highest yield in 1998 and in 1999, but because of root rot in the plots, there was considerable variability among plots. By 1999, all plots of ‘Encore’ and ‘Malahat’ had died. In the planting established in 2000, ‘Cascade Bounty’ was compared to ‘Cascade Delight’, ‘Meeker’, ‘Chilliwack’, ‘Willamette’, ‘Cowichan’, ‘Malahat’, ‘Qualicum’ and ‘Tulameen’. Before the 2003 harvests, all plots of ‘Cowichan’, ‘Malahat’, ‘Qualicum’ and ‘Tulameen’ had died from root rot. In both 2003 and 2004, yield for these plots was set to 0 and missing values for other variables. ‘Cascade Bounty’ was extremely productive and had higher yields than all other cultivars in each year. Fruit weight of ‘Cascade Bounty’ was similar to ‘Meeker’ in both plantings and both were smaller than ‘Cascade Delight’. Fruit firmness for ‘Cascade Bounty’ was similar to ‘Meeker’ in both years. The 5%, 50% and 95% harvest dates were similar for ‘Cascade Bounty’ and ‘Cascade Delight’ and ‘Meeker’ (except for the date of 95% of harvest in 2003 for ‘Meeker’). ‘Cascade Bounty’ was also subjectively evaluated in plots established in 2003 that were machine harvested at Burlington, Wash. ‘Cascade Bounty’ machine harvested acceptably for bulk frozen, puree or juice uses. There was some broken fruit and soft fruit, so it may not be suitable for IQF fruit (Individually Quick Frozen fruit).
Disease resistance
‘Cascade Bounty’ is susceptible to the large raspberry aphid (Amphorophora agathonica) the vector for the mosaic virus complex. It appears to be susceptible to raspberry bushy dwarf virus (RBDV) via pollen transmission. In unsprayed plots, the canes had some spur blight (Didymella applanata [Niessl] Sacc.) infections, but with a low incidence. ‘Cascade Bounty’ has been planted in areas with high levels of root rot (Phytophthora fragariae var. rubi, Wilcox & Duncan) and has had high yields with vigorous plants. ‘Cascade Bounty’ appears to have high levels of root rot tolerance.
While the invention has been described in connection with specific embodiments thereof, it will be understood that it is capable of further modification, and this application is intended to cover any variations, uses, or adaptations of the invention following, in general, the principles of the invention and including such departures from the present disclosure as come within known or customary practice in the art to which the invention pertains and as may be applied to the essential features hereinbefore set forth, and as fall within the scope of the invention and the limits of the appended claims.
TABLE 1
Cane measurements taken on Jul. 16, 2004, Puyallup, Wash..
CASCADE Cascade
BOUNTY Delight Meeker
Primocanes
Diameter base (mm) 12.4a 12.7a 11.9a
Diameter 4 ft (mm) 8.5a 8.7a 10.6a
Length (cm) 187.1a 191.3a 212.5a
Number of nodes 37.0a 35.0a 44.3a
Internode length (cm) 68.7a 68.7a 65.3a
Number of canes/hill 60.0a 39.7b 19.0c
Cane color 145B 145C 145D
Spine color 186A 187A 186A
Floricanes
Diameter base (mm) 13.9a 14.7a 12.4a
Diameter 4 ft (mm) 11.0a 10.8a 7.4b
Length (cm) 189.7a 193.9a 143.1b
Number of nodes 22.7b 24.3b 30.7a
Internode length (cm) 82.2a 71.3ab 48.9b
Cane color 175C 166C 165B
Three canes were measured for each clone.
zRoyal Horticultural Society Colour Chart designations
Means within a row followed by the same letter are not significantly different at P ≦ 0.05, by Duncan's Multiple Range Test.
TABLE 2
Primocane leaves measured at 4 feet on Jun. 19, 2003, Puyallup,
Wash..
CASCADE Cascade
BOUNTY Boyne Delight Chief
Petiole length (mm) 96.8a 65.1b 85.7a 58.0b
Rachis length (mm) 49.5ab 48.2b 58.6a 47.6b
stipule length (mm) 10.0a 11.2a 6.0c 8.8ab
terminal leaflet
length (mm) 129.5b 112.0c 143.8a 86.9d
width (mm) 83.5b 79.5b 101.4a 60.4c
petiolule length (mm) 16.6bc 20.5b 28.7a 11.8c
distal lateral leaflet
length (mm) 100.1b 94.2b 116.1a 70.3c
width (mm) 53.7b 55.6b 64.7a 41.8c
petiolule length (mm) 0.0a 0.0a 0.0a 0.0a
basal lateral leaflet
length (mm) 124.9a 108.4b 135.4a 85.3c
width (mm) 78.1b 73.6bc 88.0a 61.3d
petiolule length (mm) 0.0d 2.6c 3.6b 0.0d
Color
upper surface of leaflet
Munsell Color 6.5GY3/3 6.5GY3/3 6.5GY4/3 6.5GY3/3
lower surface of leaflet
Munsell Color 6.5GY5/2 6GY5/2 6GY5/2 6GY5/2
Killarney Meeker
Petiole length (mm) 57.4b 94.3a
Rachis length (mm) 42.3ab 53.6ab
stipule length (mm) 7.1bc 11.4a
terminal leaflet
length (mm) 98.2d 124.2bc
width (mm) 104.7a 74.8b
petiolule length (mm) 32.4a 14.2bc
distal lateral leaflet
length (mm) 82.0bc 90.6b
width (mm) 56.5b 43.1c
petiolule length (mm) 0.0a 0.0a
basal lateral leaflet
length (mm) 84.1c 109.2bc
width (mm) 69.4cd 68.4cd
petiolule length (mm) 0.0d 5.0a
Color
upper surface of leaflet
Munsell Color 6.5GY3/3 6.5GY3/3
lower surface of leaflet
Munsell Color 6GY6/2 6.5GY5/2
Five leaves were measured for each clone. All clones had 5 leaflets, except Killarney, which had 1 leaf with 5 leaflets and 4 leaves with 3 leaflets.
Means within a row followed by the same letter are not significantly different at P ≦ 0.05, by Duncan's Multiple Range Test.
TABLE 3
Floricane leaves measured at 4 feet on Jun. 17, 2004, Puyallup,
Wash..
CASCADE Cascade
BOUNTY Boyne Delight Chief
Number of leaflets 3a 3a 3a 3a
Petiole length (mm) 29.6b 31.9a-c 39.0ab 50.4a
stipule length (mm) 1.7a 0.0a 0.0a 0.9a
terminal leaflet
length (mm) 88.4 96.5 94.3 66.6
width (mm) 65.2a 55.3a 68.7a 51.0a
petiolule length (mm) 15.8a 14.9a 27.0a 13.1a
basal lateral leaflet
length (mm) 64.2b-c 84.2a 78.0ab 58.8cd
width (mm) 40.2a 47.4a 43.7a 40.5a
petiolule length (mm) 0.0b-c 1.5a 2.3a 0.0b
Color
upper surface of leaflet
Munsell Color 5.5GY3/3 6GY3/3 5GY3/3 5GY3/3
lower surface of leaflet
Munsell Color 5GY6/2 5GY5/2 4.5GY6/2 4GY6/2
Killarney Meeker
Number of leaflets 3a 3a
Petiole length (mm) 24.2c 41.1ab
stipule length (mm) 0.0a 1.9a
terminal leaflet
length (mm) 74.8 85.1
width (mm) 60.5a 57.7a
petiolule length (mm) 16.0a 19.3a
basal lateral leaflet
length (mm) 53.8d 70.2a-c
width (mm) 41.8a 40.0a
petiolule length (mm) 1.8a 1.8a
Color
upper surface of leaflet
Munsell Color 5GY3/2 6GY3/3
lower surface of leaflet
Munsell Color 5.5GY6/2 5.5GY6/2
Five leaves were measured for each clone.
Means within a row followed by the same letter are not significantly different at P ≦ 0.05, by Duncan's Multiple Range Test.
TABLE 4
Flower measurements taken at 4 feet on May 26, 2004, Puyallup,
Wash.
CASCADE Cascade
BOUNTY Delight
Flower diameter
Sepal-sepal (mm) 24.2a 25.5a
petal-petal (mm) 10.2a 10.6a
lateral length (cm) 594a 610a
Number of nodes/lateral 13.8a 15.0a
Number of flowering nodes/lateral 10.0a 8.5a
Number of nodes with more than 1 flower 9.5a 6.8b
Number of flower buds/lateral 19.3a 12.5a
Number of flowers/lateral 5.75a 3.75a
Number of developing fruit/lateral 6.75a 1.00b
Number of buds, flowers, fruit/lateral 31.75a 17.25b
Number of buds, flowers, fruit/node 3.21a 2.02b
Number of buds, flowers, fruit/fruiting node 2.32a 1.15b
Colorz
petals 155C 155C
sepals 147D 147D
pedicelsy 144A/183A 144A/183A
Five flowering laterals were measured for each clone.
zRoyal Horticultural Society Colour Chart designations
yPedicels were variable in color, being green with exposed portions being red/purple.
Means within a row followed by the same letter are not significantly difterent at P ≦ 0.05, by Duncan's Multiple Range Test.
TABLE 5
Lateral measurements taken at 4 feet on Jul. 16, 2004, Puyallup,
Wash..
CASCADE Cascade
BOUNTY Delight Meeker
Pedicel length (cm) 14.1a 24.8a 19.8a
Number of fruit/lateral 29.0a 15.0b 20.0b
Number of nodes/lateral 11.7a 13.7a 13.7a
Number of fruiting nodes/lateral 9.0a 9.7a 8.7a
Number of fruit/fruiting node 3.2a 1.5c 2.3b
Three fruiting laterals were measured for each clone.
Means within a row followed by the same letter are not significantly different at P < 0.05, by Duncan's Multiple Range Test.
TABLE 6
Fruit morphological characteristics, fruit harvested Jun. 18 and 25, 2004,
Puyallup, Wash..
CASCADE Cascade
BOUNTY Boyne Delight Chief
Fruit weight (g) 5.29b 2.94e 7.08a 1.64f
Length (mm) 23.4b 17.3d 30.5a 14.3e
Width (mm) 22.0a 19.2b 22.6a 15.6c
L/W ratio 1.07b 0.91c 1.35a 0.92c
Receptacle diameter (mm) 8.3b 6.7c 9.9a 5.0d
Receptacle length (mm) 12.7b 8.1d 20.0a 6.2e
Drupelet length (mm) 5.6a 5.5a 5.9a 5.2a
Drupelet width (mm) 4.0bc 4.1bc 4.7a 3.9bc
Number of drupelets 85.8b 60.6cd 100.8a 52.8d
Drupelet weight (mg) 61.8b 48.9d 70.2a 31.1e
Total seed weight (mg) 186.6a 97.2b 192.3a 73.7c
Individual seed weight (mg) 2.18a 1.60c 1.91b 1.40d
Munsell Color 4.5R3/6 3.5R3/4 4.5R3/6 4.5R3/6
Killarney Meeker
Fruit weight (g) 3.67d 4.51c
Length (mm) 21.2c 21.8c
Width (mm) 21.2a 21.9a
L/W ratio 1.00b 1.00b
Receptacle diameter (mm) 8.5b 9.5a
Receptacle length (mm) 10.8c 13.1b
Drupelet length (mm) 5.6a 5.6a
Drupelet width (mm) 4.3ab 3.7c
Number of drupelets 67.6c 101.8a
Drupelet weight (mg) 54.7c 44.3d
Total seed weight (mg) 112.5b 198.5a
Individual seed weight (mg) 1.67c 1.95b
Munsell Color 4.5R3/6 4.5R3/6
Boyne, Chief and Killarney harvested on June 18 and Cascade Delight, Meeker and CASCADE BOUNTY harvested on June 25.
Means within a row followed by the same letter are not significantly different at P ≦ 0.05, by Duncan's Multiple Range Test.
TABLE 7
Fruit analysis of red ripe fruit harvested July 2003, at Puyallup,
Wash..
Titratable
Soluble acidity Anthocyanin
solids (% citric Concentration
Clone (° brix) pH acid) (mg/g fruit)
CASCADE BOUNTY 10.6c 2.39c 1.26a 0.417c
Cascade Delight 11.5ab 2.75a 1.33a 0.630a
Meeker 12.1a 2.70ab 0.85b 0.459c
Willamette 11.2bc 2.52bc 0.96b 0.539b
Analysis of three replications of 10 g of fruit.
Means within a column followed by the same letter are not significantly different at P ≦ 0.05, by Duncan's Multiple Range Test.
TABLE 8
Harvest comparison of BOUNTY with six Pacific Northwest raspberry
cultivars, planted 1996 at Puyallup, Wash..
Harvest season
Fruit Length
Fruit Firm- of
Yield weight ness season
(t/a) (g) (g) 5% 50% 95% (d)
1998 harvest
CAS- 10.7a 3.70a 150a 7/4a 7/15a 7/31a 27a
CADE
BOUNTY
Comox 8.5ab 3.59a 195a 6/27b 7/9c 7/20c 23ab
Encore 3.7b 3.74a 189a 7/2ab 7/10bc 7/19c 18b
Malahat 9.1ab 4.14a 171a 6/26b 7/8c 7/22c 26ab
Meeker 7.8ab 3.30a 165a 7/2ab 7/14ab 7/29ab 28a
Tulameen 8.7ab 4.17a 159a 7/2ab 7/11bc 7/25a-c 23ab
Willa- 7.2ab 3.10a 155a 6/27b 7/9c 7/22bc 25ab
mette
1999 harvest
CAS- 7.9a 3.10a 160a 7/5ab 7/19a 8/2a 28a
CADE
BOUNTY
Comox 3.0ab 2.94a 239a 7/8ab 7/18ab 7/29ab 21a
Encore 0.0b
Malahat 0.0b
Meeker 4.4ab 3.34a 172a 7/11a 7/22a 8/1ab 22a
Tulameen 1.3ab 3.64a 166a 7/7ab 7/17ab 7/28ab 21a
Willa- 2.2ab 2.70a 183a 6/28b 7/9b 7/20b 22a
mette
Based on the means of three replications of three plants for each location or harvest season.
Cultivars that died because of root rot had yield set to 0 and missing values for other variables.
Means within a column followed by the same letter are not significantly different at P ≦ 0.05, by Tukey's Studentized Range Test (HSD)
TABLE 9
Harvest comparison of BOUNTY with eight Pacific Northwest raspberry
cultivars, planted 2000 at Puyallup, Wash.
Harvest season
Fruit Length
Fruit Firm- of
Yield weight ness season
(t/a) (g) (g) 5% 50% 95% (d)
2003 harvest
CAS- 11.7a 3.3b 163a 7/30a 8/10a 8/25a 25a
CADE
BOUNTY
Cascade 8.7b 4.5a 197a 7/31a 8/11a 8/25a 24a
Delight
Meeker 1.2c 3.2b 174a 8/1a 8/11a 8/19b 18a
Chilliwack 1.1c 2.3b 161a 7/26a 8/3b 8/14c 19a
Willa- 0.4c 1.9b 124a 7/25a 8/4b 8/12d 18a
mette
Cowichan 0.0c
Malahat 0.0c
Qualicum 0.0c
Tulameen 0.0c
2004 harvest
CAS- 15.2a 3.5b 144b 7/21a 8/3a 8/18a 28a
CADE
BOUNTY
Cascade 8.7b 4.2a 223a 7/23a 8/1a 8/15a 22b
Delight
Meeker 2.3c 2.7bc 173ab 7/22a 8/5a 8/17a 26ab
Chilliwack 0.7c 2.2c 167ab 7/18a 7/24b 8/7b 20b
Cowichan 0.0c
Malahat 0.0c
Qualicum 0.0c
Tulameen 0.0c
Willa- 0.0c
mette
Based on the means of three replications of three plants for each location or harvest season.
Cultivars that died because of root rot had yield set to 0 and missing values for other variables.
Means within a column followed by the same letter are not significantly different at P ≦ 0.05, by Tukey's Studentized Range Test (HSD)

Claims (1)

1. A new and distinct variety of raspberry plant, substantially as shown and described, characterized particularly by improved resistance to root rot.
US11/057,898 2005-02-15 2005-02-15 Raspberry cultivar ‘Cascade Bounty’ Expired - Lifetime USPP18246P3 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/057,898 USPP18246P3 (en) 2005-02-15 2005-02-15 Raspberry cultivar ‘Cascade Bounty’

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/057,898 USPP18246P3 (en) 2005-02-15 2005-02-15 Raspberry cultivar ‘Cascade Bounty’

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20060185042P1 US20060185042P1 (en) 2006-08-17
USPP18246P3 true USPP18246P3 (en) 2007-11-27

Family

ID=36817176

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/057,898 Expired - Lifetime USPP18246P3 (en) 2005-02-15 2005-02-15 Raspberry cultivar ‘Cascade Bounty’

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) USPP18246P3 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
USPP28173P3 (en) 2014-11-04 2017-07-11 Five Aces Breeding Llc Raspberry plant named ‘Pearl’

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
USPP28173P3 (en) 2014-11-04 2017-07-11 Five Aces Breeding Llc Raspberry plant named ‘Pearl’

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20060185042P1 (en) 2006-08-17

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
USPP17162P3 (en) Blackberry plant named ‘Ouachita’
USPP20891P3 (en) Blackberry plant named ‘Natchez’
USPP16989P3 (en) Blackberry—APF-12 cultivar
USPP15788P2 (en) Blackberry—APF-8 cultivar
USPP34867P2 (en) Blackberry plant named ‘APF-268’
USPP18246P3 (en) Raspberry cultivar ‘Cascade Bounty’
USPP32896P2 (en) Cranberry plant named ‘CNJ99-9-25’
USPP22781P2 (en) Strawberry plant named ‘Puget Crimson’
USPP14522P3 (en) Raspberry cultivar named WSU 1090
USPP17985P3 (en) Raspberry cultivar ‘Cascade Dawn’
USPP16571P3 (en) Strawberry plant named ‘Clancy’
USPP33329P2 (en) Blackberry plant named ‘APF-238T’
USPP34598P2 (en) Rubus plant named ‘BT RASFOUR’
USPP34811P2 (en) Pecan tree named ‘Pueblo’
USPP32721P2 (en) Rubus plant named ‘BWPRASP01’
USPP33115P2 (en) Blackberry plant named ‘Caddo’
USPP32031P3 (en) Raspberry plant named ‘Plapink 1004’
USPP31197P3 (en) Rubus plant named ‘emr 20171’
USPP16480P3 (en) Strawberry plant named ‘L&#39;Amour’
USPP17774P3 (en) Kiwi plant named ‘Hort51-1785’
USPP30213P2 (en) Strawberry plant named ‘Archer’
USPP14035P3 (en) Raspberry variety named ‘Motueka’
USPP22358P2 (en) Blackberry plant named ‘ONYX’
USPP16836P2 (en) Peach tree named ‘H28-52-96270’
USPP21685P3 (en) Raspberry plant named ‘Elegance’

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION, W

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MOORE, PATRICK P.;REEL/FRAME:016968/0502

Effective date: 20041230

点击 这是indexloc提供的php浏览器服务,不要输入任何密码和下载