+

US8977362B2 - Peripheral pain management - Google Patents

Peripheral pain management Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US8977362B2
US8977362B2 US13/643,670 US201113643670A US8977362B2 US 8977362 B2 US8977362 B2 US 8977362B2 US 201113643670 A US201113643670 A US 201113643670A US 8977362 B2 US8977362 B2 US 8977362B2
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
pain
firing
burst
activity
electrical
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
US13/643,670
Other languages
English (en)
Other versions
US20130066394A1 (en
Inventor
Carl Y. Saab
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Rhode Island Hospital
Original Assignee
Rhode Island Hospital
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Rhode Island Hospital filed Critical Rhode Island Hospital
Priority to US13/643,670 priority Critical patent/US8977362B2/en
Publication of US20130066394A1 publication Critical patent/US20130066394A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US8977362B2 publication Critical patent/US8977362B2/en
Assigned to RHODE ISLAND HOSPITAL reassignment RHODE ISLAND HOSPITAL ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: SAAB, CARL Y
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61N—ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
    • A61N1/00—Electrotherapy; Circuits therefor
    • A61N1/18—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes
    • A61N1/32—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents
    • A61N1/36—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents for stimulation
    • A61N1/3605—Implantable neurostimulators for stimulating central or peripheral nerve system
    • A61N1/3606—Implantable neurostimulators for stimulating central or peripheral nerve system adapted for a particular treatment
    • A61N1/36071—Pain
    • A61B5/0476—
    • A61B5/0484—
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00—Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/24—Detecting, measuring or recording bioelectric or biomagnetic signals of the body or parts thereof
    • A61B5/316—Modalities, i.e. specific diagnostic methods
    • A61B5/369—Electroencephalography [EEG]
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00—Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/24—Detecting, measuring or recording bioelectric or biomagnetic signals of the body or parts thereof
    • A61B5/316—Modalities, i.e. specific diagnostic methods
    • A61B5/369—Electroencephalography [EEG]
    • A61B5/377—Electroencephalography [EEG] using evoked responses
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00—Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/48—Other medical applications
    • A61B5/4824—Touch or pain perception evaluation
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61N—ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
    • A61N1/00—Electrotherapy; Circuits therefor
    • A61N1/18—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes
    • A61N1/32—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents
    • A61N1/36—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents for stimulation
    • A61N1/3605—Implantable neurostimulators for stimulating central or peripheral nerve system
    • A61N1/36125—Details of circuitry or electric components
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61N—ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
    • A61N1/00—Electrotherapy; Circuits therefor
    • A61N1/18—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes
    • A61N1/32—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents
    • A61N1/36—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents for stimulation
    • A61N1/3605—Implantable neurostimulators for stimulating central or peripheral nerve system
    • A61N1/36128—Control systems
    • A61N1/36135—Control systems using physiological parameters
    • A61N1/36139—Control systems using physiological parameters with automatic adjustment
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61N—ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
    • A61N1/00—Electrotherapy; Circuits therefor
    • A61N1/18—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes
    • A61N1/32—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents
    • A61N1/36—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents for stimulation
    • A61N1/3605—Implantable neurostimulators for stimulating central or peripheral nerve system
    • A61N1/36128—Control systems
    • A61N1/36146—Control systems specified by the stimulation parameters
    • A61N1/3615—Intensity
    • A61N1/36153—Voltage
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61N—ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
    • A61N1/00—Electrotherapy; Circuits therefor
    • A61N1/18—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes
    • A61N1/32—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents
    • A61N1/36—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents for stimulation
    • A61N1/3605—Implantable neurostimulators for stimulating central or peripheral nerve system
    • A61N1/36128—Control systems
    • A61N1/36146—Control systems specified by the stimulation parameters
    • A61N1/3615—Intensity
    • A61N1/36157—Current
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61N—ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
    • A61N1/00—Electrotherapy; Circuits therefor
    • A61N1/18—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes
    • A61N1/32—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents
    • A61N1/36—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents for stimulation
    • A61N1/3605—Implantable neurostimulators for stimulating central or peripheral nerve system
    • A61N1/36128—Control systems
    • A61N1/36146—Control systems specified by the stimulation parameters
    • A61N1/36167—Timing, e.g. stimulation onset
    • A61N1/36171—Frequency
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61N—ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
    • A61N1/00—Electrotherapy; Circuits therefor
    • A61N1/18—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes
    • A61N1/32—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents
    • A61N1/36—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents for stimulation
    • A61N1/3605—Implantable neurostimulators for stimulating central or peripheral nerve system
    • A61N1/36128—Control systems
    • A61N1/36146—Control systems specified by the stimulation parameters
    • A61N1/36167—Timing, e.g. stimulation onset
    • A61N1/36175—Pulse width or duty cycle
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61N—ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
    • A61N1/00—Electrotherapy; Circuits therefor
    • A61N1/18—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes
    • A61N1/32—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents
    • A61N1/36—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents for stimulation
    • A61N1/3605—Implantable neurostimulators for stimulating central or peripheral nerve system
    • A61N1/36128—Control systems
    • A61N1/36146—Control systems specified by the stimulation parameters
    • A61N1/36167—Timing, e.g. stimulation onset
    • A61N1/36178—Burst or pulse train parameters
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00—Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/68—Arrangements of detecting, measuring or recording means, e.g. sensors, in relation to patient
    • A61B5/6846—Arrangements of detecting, measuring or recording means, e.g. sensors, in relation to patient specially adapted to be brought in contact with an internal body part, i.e. invasive
    • A61B5/6867—Arrangements of detecting, measuring or recording means, e.g. sensors, in relation to patient specially adapted to be brought in contact with an internal body part, i.e. invasive specially adapted to be attached or implanted in a specific body part
    • A61B5/6868—Brain
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00—Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/72—Signal processing specially adapted for physiological signals or for diagnostic purposes
    • A61B5/7235—Details of waveform analysis
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00—Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/72—Signal processing specially adapted for physiological signals or for diagnostic purposes
    • A61B5/7235—Details of waveform analysis
    • A61B5/7253—Details of waveform analysis characterised by using transforms
    • A61B5/7257—Details of waveform analysis characterised by using transforms using Fourier transforms

Definitions

  • Chronic pain is typically classified as pain lasting more than 6 months and generally divided into three main types: nociceptive, psychogenic or neuropathic (e.g., due to nerve injury) although the distinction between these types can be blurred.
  • current treatment options including opioids and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (e.g. COX inhibitors) are often ineffective, contraindicated or associated with significant gastrointestinal and cardiac side effects, sedation, respiratory depression, addiction and drug abuse.
  • opioids and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs e.g. COX inhibitors
  • COX inhibitors nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
  • pharmacotherapy, surgical ablation, and externally applied non-drug therapies e.g. transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and acupuncture
  • Novel ideas are thus needed in pain research.
  • Chronic clinical pain includes neuropathic pain such as that associated with direct nerve damage, amputation, chemotherapy, diabetes, HIV infection or AIDS, Multiple Sclerosis, shingles, sciatic nerve compression or injury, as well as spine surgery.
  • a method of identifying a subject characterized as suffering from chronic pain is carried out by detecting a pain signature comprising an pattern of neuronal firing compared to a normal pattern of neuronal firing, e.g., a pattern obtained from a subject or a cohort of subjects that have been characterized as not suffering from pain.
  • the pattern of firing is obtained from a single neuron or a plurality of neurons.
  • the brain of a subject afflicted with chronic pain has stored a pain signature.
  • the pattern comprises an elevated evoked response to stimuli, rhythmic after-discharge signaling, and/or increased spontaneous background firing.
  • the pain and neuronal firing pattern subsists after an injury heals or is completely unrelated to a stimulus, e.g., an injury, or the degree of a stimulus.
  • the pain signature comprises a pattern of neuronal burst-firing, each burst of the burst firing comprising at least 10 times, 50 times, 100 times or more, the number of spikes compared to a control non-pain pattern.
  • An exemplary pain signature comprises a pattern of burst-firing that is characterized by one or more of the following measurable parameters: (a) a maximum interval signifying burst onset (6 ms); (b) a maximum interspike interval (9 ms); (c) longest increase in interspike interval within a burst (2 ms); (d) a minimum number of spikes within a burst (2).
  • An aberrant pattern or pain signature is further characterized by a spontaneous high frequency rhythmic oscillation of long epoch.
  • a method of preventing or reducing pain perception involves identifying a subject using the criteria described above and administering to the subject at least one electrical pulse to the subject, the electrical pulse being at least about 100, 150, or 200 Hz, between about 1 and about 3 volts, between about 1 and about 3 milliampere, and between about 0.25 and about 1 second in duration. Rather than stimulating the aberrantly firing neurons back to a recovery pattern, the electrical pulse of at least about 100 Hz jams or halts the pain circuitry at the level of the source.
  • Subjects to be diagnosed and/or treated include human patients as well as animals such as companion animals (e.g., dogs, cats) as well as livestock and performance animals (e.g., horses, cattle, and the like).
  • the invention includes an anatomically-based and neurotechnology-oriented pain therapy system to achieve neuromodulation of specific brain regions, for example using transcutaneous magnetic fields or chronically implanted electrodes.
  • the invention provides a system including a processor configured to be coupled to an electrical lead that is configured to sense electrical activity in a patient, a memory coupled to the processor, the memory containing computer readable instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to detect a pain signature in the sensed electrical activity, determine a treatment protocol in response to the detected pain signature, and cause the treatment protocol to be delivered to the patient via the electrical lead.
  • the invention provides a system including a processor configured to provide an electrical treatment protocol to a patient, the electrical treatment protocol being configured to treat chronic pain in the patient, the treatment protocol including providing at least one electrical pulse to the patient, the electrical pulse being at least about 150 Hz, between about 1 and about 3 volts, between about 1 and about 3 milliampere, and between about 0.25 and about 1 second in duration.
  • the invention provides a method of identifying a subject comprising chronic pain, including detecting a pain signature comprising a pattern of neuronal firing, said pattern comprising an elevated evoked response to stimuli, rhythmic after-discharge signaling, and increased spontaneous background firing.
  • the invention provides a method of identifying a subject comprising chronic pain, comprising detecting a pain signature comprising a pattern of burst-firing, each burst of said burst firing comprising at least 10 times the number of spikes compared to a control non-pain pattern.
  • the invention provides a method of identifying a subject comprising chronic pain, comprising detecting a pain signature including a pattern of burst-firing, wherein said pattern comprises burst-firing, said burst firing including (a) a maximum interval signifying burst onset (6 ms), (b) a maximum interspike interval (9 ms), (c) longest increase in interspike interval within a burst (2 ms), or (d) a minimum number of spikes within a burst (2).
  • the invention provides a method of preventing or reducing pain perception, comprising identifying a subject, and administering to said subject at least one electrical pulse to the subject, the electrical pulse being at least about 150 Hz, between about 1 and about 3 volts, between about 1 and about 3 milliampere, and between about 0.25 and about 1 second in duration.
  • Various aspects of the invention may provide one or more of the following capabilities.
  • the efficiency, battery life, and device life of devices used for neurostimulation can be improved over prior techniques. More physiologically relevant brain structures can be targeted compared with prior techniques. Side effects can be reduced compared with prior techniques. The temporal and overall amount of delivered current can be reduced compared with prior techniques. The likelihood of excessive tissue exposure, which has been thought to cause long-term changes and side effects, can be reduced compared with prior techniques. The necessity for combined pharmacologic intervention can be reduced, or possibly eliminated compared prior techniques. Chronic pain can be empirically diagnosed.
  • FIG. 1 is a diagram of a classic ‘pain pathway’ illustrating the spinothalamic tract (STT) and how nociceptive information is transmitted from the periphery via the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) to central structures including the ventroposterior lateral (VPL) nucleus of the thalamus to the cerebral cortex (Cc).
  • STT spinothalamic tract
  • DRG dorsal root ganglion
  • VPL ventroposterior lateral nucleus of the thalamus to the cerebral cortex
  • FIG. 2A is a diagram of a deep brain stimulation (DBS) system.
  • DBS deep brain stimulation
  • FIG. 2B is a flow diagram showing a diagnostic protocol for pain.
  • FIG. 3 is a graphical representation of a representative example of a single unit recording comparison between CCI and Naive subjects.
  • Each graph displays the firing (mV) of a single WDR neuron over time and corresponding peristimulus time histograms of the data.
  • Both VPL neurons used for recording possessed receptive fields at the hind-paw.
  • CCI model rats display an increase in spontaneous background firing (shown in yellow), elevated pressure and pinch responses (green), and rhythmic after-discharge signaling (blue).
  • FIG. 4 is a bar graph showing a comparison of the mean evoked response frequency over all group 1 (CCI) and group 2 (naive) rats. Statistically significant increases in spontaneous activity and after discharge, as well as evoked pressure and pinch responses are shown (*P ⁇ 0.05).
  • FIG. 5 is a line graph showing a comparison of rat withdrawal latency between the hindpaw ipsilateral and contralateral to the sciatic nerve injury as measured during behavioral testing.
  • the withdrawal latency of the injured hindpaw (pink) is significantly lower than baseline by days 6 and 7 (* P ⁇ 0.0.5).
  • FIG. 6 is a graph showing a representative example of a comparison between Isoflurane and Pentobarbital anesthesia. Activity in a single VPL unit is recorded under conditions of Isoflurane (2%) followed by Pentobarbital 20 minutes later (i.v. 40 mg/kg/hr) in a single animal. No major difference in spontaneous or evoked activity is apparent.
  • FIG. 7 is a bar graph showing an electrophysiological response to mechanical stimuli in pre- and post-HFS conditions.
  • VPL neurons of group 5 rats post HFS are significantly less reactive to mechanical stimuli via brush, Von Frey, pressure, and pinch than during initial baseline recording (P ⁇ 0.05).
  • FIG. 8 is a bar graph showing a background electrophysiological comparison in pre- and post-HFS conditions.
  • VPL neurons of group 5 rats post HFS display significantly lower levels of afterdischarge (20 seconds post mechanical stimulation) while levels of background firing remain relatively constant (* P ⁇ 0.05).
  • FIG. 9 is a line graph showing withdrawal Latency of the ipsilateral hindpaw in deep brain stimulation (DBS) group 6 rats. Within 5 minutes of neurostimulation, withdrawal latency significantly increases, with effects lasting 0.5-2 hrs.
  • DBS deep brain stimulation
  • FIG. 10 is a bar graph showing OX-42 antibody staining comparison between CCI and CCI+DBS animals in VPL contralateral to CCI (i.e. receiving pain input from the injured leg and the implant), DBS subjects displayed significantly higher levels of OX-42 antibody staining as compared with untreated CCI subjects (*P ⁇ 0.05). Reflected differences were measured as changes in the mean grayscale value of photographed microscope images of the VPL, indicating a physiologic local effect for HFS.
  • FIG. 11 is a bar graph GFAP antibody staining comparison between CCI and CCI+DBS animals in VPL contralateral to CCI (i.e. receiving pain input from the injured leg and the implant). Measured differences in GFAP staining were not statistically significant, suggesting lack of astrogliosis, tissue scarring or prominent neuroinflammatory reaction to HFS.
  • FIG. 12 is a series of bar graph showing burst characterization in response to various stimuli, e.g., brush, Von Frey, pressure, and pinch.
  • FIG. 13 is a graphical representation showing neuronal activity from a single unit in the thalamus (VPL) with receptive field in the injured hindpaw one week after CCI.
  • VPL thalamus
  • FIG. 14 is a drawing and a photograph of rodent into which microelectrodes were implanted in the brain with tips located in the VPL nucleus of the thalamus.
  • Signal generated from these electrodes (RE) was relayed to a data acquisition system via a head stage fixed to the skull of the animal.
  • Neuropathic pain was measured behaviorally and induced by chronic constriction injury (CCI) of the sciatic nerve, a ‘mixed’ nerve that receives sensory input from the leg and connects with central nervous system (CNS) circuitry projecting into the VPL.
  • CCI chronic constriction injury
  • CNS central nervous system
  • a laser beam was focused on the plantar hindlimb to illicit a withdrawal behavior of measurable latency.
  • FIG. 15 is a photograph of a modified microelectrode design. Electrode segments were fused together with Epoxy resin in order to form a respective cathode and anode during DBS trials. The Teflon coating was cut to reveal 0.5 mm of silver wire on each electrode. Cathode and Anode are separated by 1 mm from tip to tip as shown.
  • FIG. 16 is a photograph of a recording setup. Following craniotomy, the microelectrode was lowered to a depth of 5-6 mm until an appropriate VPL unit was isolated for recording.
  • FIG. 17 is an illustration of the relative position of the bipolar stimulating electrodes in relation to the VPL, and the area directly affected by stimulation (shaded) based on several modeling studies (refer to text).
  • FIG. 18A is a line graph
  • FIG. 18B is a bar graph
  • FIG. 18A shows representative examples of tonic firing in two units under na ⁇ ve and CCI conditions. Note increased rate of spontaneous firing and firing evoked by pressure (Pr), pinch (Pi) and afterdischarge (AD) in CCI rat compared to na ⁇ ve.
  • FIGS. 19A-B are line graphs, and FIG. 19C is a bar graph.
  • FIG. 19A shows a representative example of spontaneously rhythmic oscillation (grey shade), which was abolished after complete spinal transection (arrow, asterisk indicates absence of a response to brush after transection). Rhythmic oscillation was observed in 3/9 (33%) neurons in rats with CCI.
  • FIG. 19B shows phase histograms during rhythmic oscillation fitted with a sine wave curve (before spinal transection, left panel). Note elimination of oscillation after transaction reflected by a much lower amplitude sine wave (right panel).
  • FIG. 19C shows sine wave parameters in neurons with oscillation fitted to phase histograms.
  • FIGS. 20A-B are line graphs showing representative examples of the effect of HFS (100 Hz) and LFS (25 Hz) on the firing rate of two VPL neurons in two rats with CCI. HFS attenuated all evoked activity and afterdischarge, whereas spontaneous firing remained unchanged. Note increasing effects with incremental increases in voltage, compared to lack of prominent effect using LFS.
  • FIG. 21 is a graphical representation showing examples of burst firing under na ⁇ ve and CCI conditions during peripheral brush stimulation.
  • Upper traces in each panel represent burst activity with corresponding spiking activity in lower traces (shaded insets represent expanded time scales of activity periods in grey boxes). Note increased burst events and number of spikes per burst after CCI.
  • FIG. 22 is a series graphical representations showing a detailed analysis of burst firing showing significantly different patterns in rats with CCI compared to na ⁇ ve. Evoked burst activity occurred in na ⁇ ve and CCI rats (although spontaneous burst was very rare in na ⁇ ve rats). Burst parameters were different in CCI rats, showing a consistent increase in the number of bursts and % spikes for all firing modalities, whereas inter-burst periods were consistently decreased. HFS reversed these changes to near ‘normal’ or na ⁇ ve values.
  • FIG. 23 is a series graphical representations showing local field potentials (upper traces) before, during and after HFS with corresponding power spectra (lower panels) showing a prominent peak between 10-20 Hz (corresponding to ⁇ activity; arrow). HFS had no effect on this peak or the overall power distribution up to 500 Hz during spontaneous firing (note emergence of peaks at 200 Hz matching stimulation frequency and a harmonic thereof at 400 Hz; arrowheads).
  • FIG. 24A is a bar graph, and FIGS. 24B-C are line graphs.
  • FIG. 24B shows the effect of HFS (arrows) on withdrawal latencies in ipsilateral and contralateral hindpaws (arrowhead denotes sham condition, i.e. connecting the stimulating electrodes to the stimulator without applying voltage).
  • FIG. 26A-B are graphical representations showing mean percent change in firing rates in two groups of VPL neurons under CCI and na ⁇ ve conditions.
  • FIG. 29 is a series of tables (Table 1, Table 2, Table 3, Table 4).
  • FIG. 30 is a graph showing a representative record of firing of neurons in the thalamus in an awake patient with chronic pain. Pain was repeatedly induced during continuous recording of the neural activity (from upper left to lower right). Dotted lines indicate tapping of the hand for activation of touch-evoked pain. Solid lines indicate pain was verbally reported by the patient.
  • FIG. 31 is a graph of a representative record of a unit in the thalamus of a rat with spinal cord injury pain to illustrate burst events (compare with FIG. 30 ).
  • 2 burst epochs alternated with unique periods identified as ‘a’ and ‘b’. These 2 epochs spontaneously alternated in a repeated manner separated by interepoch intervals of low firing activity, exhibiting a rhythmic oscillatory firing pattern.
  • FIG. 32 is a line graph showing a spectral analysis of spontaneous activity.
  • Mean power spectra for patients with Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) red
  • normal subjects black
  • LFP local field potential
  • FIG. 34 is a series of graphs showing spontaneous activity and activity in response to brushing of the contralateral paw.
  • Spectral power was computed using FFT analysis of the recorded signal from the VPL bilaterally and normalized for each VPL.
  • a broad peak (1-15 Hz) was observed under spontaneous conditions in CT, which more prominently shifted leftwards (1-3 Hz) in CCI.
  • the peak at around 5 Hz was more prominent in CCI compared to CT, with a broader power distribution in the higher-frequency (5-15 Hz) region.
  • Overall power was increased bilaterally during evoked responses to brush; however, this increase was almost 3 folds higher in CCI (note increased evoked/spontaneous ratio of area power from 1.16 in CT to 3.05 in CCI).
  • Red plots represent Gaussian data fit.
  • Chronic pain is a serious challenge in terms of pathophysiology, diagnosis, therapy and social burden.
  • Studies in humans and laboratory animals suggest a relationship between intractable pain and ectopic neuronal activity in thalamic and cortical areas, leading to dysfunctional connectivity in the brain's ‘pain network’.
  • Contributing to this network are dense interconnections between thalamic and cortical modules whose interactions are being investigated in terms of directionality and temporal dynamics.
  • intracranial electrode recordings demonstrate altered neuronal activity within these networks in patients with chronic pain.
  • Chronic pain is itself a disease process.
  • Chronic pain is unrelenting and not self-limiting and as stated earlier, can persist for years and even decades after the initial injury. If not treated, chronic pain can lead to anxiety, fear, depression, sleeplessness and impairment of social interaction.
  • Chronic, non-malignant pain is predominately neuropathic in nature and involves damage either to the peripheral or central nervous systems.
  • Nociceptive and neuropathic pain are caused by different neurophysiological processes, and therefore respond to different treatment modalities.
  • Nociceptive pain is mediated by receptors on A-delta and C-fibers which are located in skin, bone, connective tissue, muscle and viscera. These receptors serve a biologically useful role at localizing noxious chemical, thermal and mechanical stimuli.
  • Nociceptive pain can be somatic or visceral in nature. Somatic pain tends to be well localized, constant pain that is described as sharp, aching, throbbing, or gnawing. Visceral pain, on the other hand, tends to be vague in distribution, paroxysmal in nature and is usually described as deep, aching, squeezing and colicky in nature.
  • nociceptive pain examples include: post-operative pain, pain associated with trauma, and the chronic pain of arthritis. Nociceptive pain often responds to opioids and non-steroidal anti-inflammatories (NSAIDS). Neuropathic pain, in contrast to nociceptive pain, is described as “burning”, “electric”, “tingling”, and “shooting” in nature and can be unrelated to a stimulus such as an injury. Examples of neuropathic pain include: monoradiculopathies, trigeminal neuralgia, postherpetic neuralgia, phantom limb pain, complex regional pain syndromes and the various peripheral neuropathies. Neuropathic pain tends to be only partially responsive to opioid therapy.
  • VPL vasosus lateral
  • DBS deep brain stimulation
  • the data described herein was generated using an art-recognized pre-clinical rat model of peripheral neuropathy (chronic constriction injury, CCI).
  • CCI peripheral neuropathy
  • the brain area studied was in the sensory thalamus (ventroposterior lateral; VPL), a major nuclear relay for sensory information.
  • VPL sensory thalamus
  • the VPL on one side of the brain receives sensory input from the contralateral side of the body (neurons in the VPL contralateral to CCI were studied).
  • Neuronal activity from single neurons in the VPL was recorded in live animals under deep anesthesia as extracellular action potentials. Neuronal patterns recorded were either evoked by stimuli on the corresponding receptive field in the body or spontaneous (no stimulation of the receptive field).
  • Tissue collected from neuropathic rats showed local neuroinflammation in the VPL contralateral to CCI.
  • DBS reversed all abnormal patterns of neuronal activity in the VPL (except spontaneous discharge, which remained high in neuropathic rats), with no side effects.
  • DBS reversed thermal hyperalgesia in neuropathic rats, with no side effects.
  • the neuronal activity patterns that make up the pain signature can be divided into two major categories: spontaneous and evoked.
  • Spontaneous activity is further divided between baseline activity (on-going spontaneous discharge in the absence of overt bodily stimuli) and afterdischarge (on-going spontaneous discharge immediately following the cessation of a noxious bodily stimulus).
  • Evoked activity is further divided between activity in response to noxious (e.g. painful high pressure or pinch) or non-noxious stimuli (e.g. gentle touch or brush).
  • noxious e.g. painful high pressure or pinch
  • non-noxious stimuli e.g. gentle touch or brush
  • the signal could be either detected in an autonomous ‘rigid’ manner (device with pre-programmed fixed set of parameters), an autonomous ‘flexible’ manner (device capable to ‘learning’, i.e. with capacity to correct for errors to improve reliability of accurate detection), or recognized by outside observer (experimenter, healthcare practitioner or self in the form of Biofeedback).
  • an autonomous ‘rigid’ manner device with pre-programmed fixed set of parameters
  • an autonomous ‘flexible’ manner device capable to ‘learning’, i.e. with capacity to correct for errors to improve reliability of accurate detection
  • recognized by outside observer experimenter, healthcare practitioner or self in the form of Biofeedback
  • One way of objectively or empirically quantifying the signature is by computing the rate of firing (i.e. number of action potentials in time) for individual neurons.
  • the data show, for example, that the firing rate during pinch under pain conditions is higher compared to normal.
  • One point to consider is that, for example, the firing rate during pressure under pain conditions is lower compared to that during pinch under normal conditions.
  • burst characteristics are based on parameters different than firing rate (e.g. number of bursts, mean spikes/burst), the same argument also applies (overlapping data between spontaneous and evoked activities).
  • Another option for the design of a closed-loop device to detect pain signature, based on firing rate, is to couple the device to a mechanical sensing probe on the affected area of the body (superficially on the skin) capable of detecting mechanical energies such as touch, pressure and pinch stimuli, as well as thermal energies such as hot/cold surfaces, and relay this information to the closed-loop device in parallel to the main neuronal detector of the brain signature.
  • a mechanical sensing probe on the affected area of the body (superficially on the skin) capable of detecting mechanical energies such as touch, pressure and pinch stimuli, as well as thermal energies such as hot/cold surfaces, and relay this information to the closed-loop device in parallel to the main neuronal detector of the brain signature.
  • Such a design would enable an automated response while lessening the need for an observer or feedback from the subject to classify the type of neuronal activity (i.e. spontaneous or evoked).
  • neuronal activities are also envisioned for the detection of the signature. These include neuronal activity recorded directly or indirectly at the level of Local Field Potential (LFP: i.e., sampling from a neuronal population) detecting shifts in power spectra using Fourier type analysis, absence or emergence of new spectral peaks), electroencephalogram (EEG), magnetoencephalogram (MEG), in addition to other types of imaging techniques and brain scans (for example Magnetic Resonance Imaging, MRI and fMRI and Positron Emission Tomography or PET, etc.)
  • LFP Local Field Potential
  • EEG electroencephalogram
  • MEG magnetoencephalogram
  • imaging techniques and brain scans for example Magnetic Resonance Imaging, MRI and fMRI and Positron Emission Tomography or PET, etc.
  • the sensor part of the closed-loop device for pain management, or an open loop sensor device for pain diagnosis depends on the capability of the sensor to record neuronal activity (from single neurons or a population of neurons, directly or indirectly using surrogate measurements such as blood flow or volume).
  • neuronal activity from single neurons or a population of neurons, directly or indirectly using surrogate measurements such as blood flow or volume.
  • Such pain signature manifests high temporal and special resolutions, as the said neuronal activity is generated by a specific population of neurons in the brain (hence close proximity of the probe is needed for specific detection of the electric signal), and that the activity pattern or changes thereof occurs mostly in the order of milliseconds or seconds. While current technology allows such high temporal and special resolutions using implantable microelectrodes, the use of other ‘sensor’ technologies, in particular non-invasive EEG functional imaging is useful.
  • design strategy considers the possibility of not only recording from a single area or structure in the brain, or looking at multiple areas or structures in the brain individually, but also studying the interaction between these regions under normal and pathological or pain conditions, as it is known that network connectivity in the brain is altered in chronic pain patients.
  • Dysfunctional network connectivity will manifest by combined temporal and spatial analysis of neuronal activity among more than one brain area or structure at any of the recording or detection levels discussed above.
  • a closed-loop device is programmed to detect the pain signature and operate upon detection of such signals to send a command to an operator that would deliver therapy with the aims of reversing the signature. For example, this device would be turned ON in wakeful states and OFF during sleep, depending on condition severity and need. Furthermore, the device is optionally set to deliver a therapeutic pulse periodically or intermittently (e.g., every 2 hrs).
  • the device In addition to being used for analgesia (decreasing existent pain), the device is used for anesthesia during invasive or surgical procedures, in particular if anesthetics or sedatives are contraindicated. More importantly, the diagnostic aspects of the device are useful in cases where subjects or patients are non-cooperative, unable to respond, cognitively impaired, facing language barrier, or where simply verbal reporting is unreliable (e.g., in the pediatric population or with adult drug-seekers).
  • Embodiments of the invention provide techniques for developing a safe, effective and long-term treatment strategy for persistent pain using, for example, deep brain stimulation (DBS) for the relief of chronic pain.
  • the techniques can include measuring electrical activity in a patient's brain to determine if a certain pain signature exists. This can involve the use of, for example, electrodes implanted into a patient's brain.
  • the technique can also include providing therapeutic electrical stimulation to, for example, the brain of the patient at predefined times, frequencies, voltages, periodicities, and currents.
  • the electrical stimulation can be provided in response to detecting the presence of the predefined pain signature in the patient in a closed-loop design, or can be provided on a periodic basis in a open loop system (e.g., every 1-2 hours). Other embodiments are within the scope of the invention.
  • One embodiment includes the use of a closed-loop design that can enable neurostimulation to be triggered upon detection of, for example, abnormal neuronal activity linked to (or immediately preceding) pain episodes, thus reversing aberrant neuronal activity and attenuating (or even preventing) pain, without interfering with ‘normal’ brain activity.
  • An additional benefit can also be the delivery of high frequency current (e.g., >150 Hz) that blocks (or ‘jams’) neuronal firing with no reported side effects.
  • a major relay station to ascending sensory information is preferably targeted in the thalamus, based on empirical evidence showing a characteristic burst firing pattern recorded from the thalamus of awake patients with neuropathic pain, which closely resembles that recorded from the thalamus of animal models of neuropathic pain.
  • pain signature a thalamic neuronal activity pattern associated with neuropathic pain in anesthetized rats
  • it has been 1) identified a thalamic neuronal activity pattern associated with neuropathic pain in anesthetized rats (‘pain signature’); 2) determined an optimal stimulation protocol that reverses pain-related thalamic firing; 3) achieved reversal of pain-related behavior by neurostimulation.
  • a series of stimulation protocols have been tested and several have been identified that best achieve reversal of pain-related neuronal activity with the least amount of current delivered in duration and intensity.
  • High frequency stimulation e.g., >150 Hz
  • the brain circuitry targeted would preferably be the pain circuitry directly, mainly the sensory thalamus.
  • the data show that a brief pulse train at high frequency typically effectively attenuates neuronal hyperexcitability in thalamic neurons associated with chronic pain, and attenuates pain behavior.
  • a neuronal activity pattern has been characterized in thalamic neurons that is associated with chronic pain.
  • the rationale for choosing thalamic neurons is at least partially based on tests showing that thalamic sensory neurons typically undergo distinctive plasticity changes under conditions of spinal cord injury-pain, and that reversal of these plastic changes by pharmacologic treatment is linked to reversal of pain behavior.
  • data suggest that thalamic sensory neurons with receptive field in the dermatome of the injured sciatic nerve (a model of neuropathic pain) undergo distinct changes, including hyper-responsiveness to peripheral stimuli, increased spontaneous firing and increased probability of afterdischarge.
  • these experiments have been validated in awake un-anesthetized rats, and tested the anti-nociceptive effects of neurostimulation on nociceptive behavior in a rat model of chronic pain.
  • Firing patterns are a product of (and influence) neurons in directly wired local circuits and in widely distributed circuits.
  • One such circuit element, the thalamus serves as an important sensory relay to higher cortical circuits.
  • An overall increase in thalamic gain is associated with an increased transfer ratio at the thalamocortical synapse that serves to more potently activate cortical circuits involved in pain sensation.
  • the information content of bursts is typically higher than single spikes.
  • the probability of generating at least one postsynaptic spike is higher for bursts than for single spikes.
  • Thalamic nociceptive neurons undergo spontaneous firing activity in normal human subjects and rats, conferring distinct neuronal rhythmicity (oscillations) at defined resonant frequencies. Temporal coincidence of such activity patterns with cortical activity mediates functional states that characterize sensory experiences.
  • VPL ventroposterior lateral
  • Rhythmic network oscillation in the thalamus is modifiable by thalamic events and external synaptic input.
  • Unstable or aberrantly processed nociceptive inputs lead to abnormal generation or amplification of nociceptive information. Therefore, neuromodulation by neurostimulation is an effective strategy to treat and/or manage chronic pain.
  • a therapeutic system comprises the following: 1) a detector linked to a stimulator in a closed-loop device to detect and reduce abnormal brain activity, thus attenuating pain in an automated way; 2) a biocompatible closed-loop neurostimulation device specific for chronic pain, 3) surgical brain implant and testing of the device, and 4) clinical application for chronic pain treatment.
  • a deep brain stimulation (DBS) system 5 for use with a patient 10 is shown.
  • the DBS system 5 includes a pattern recognition system 15 , a processor 20 , a signal generator 25 , an analog-to-digital converter 30 , and a digital to analog converter 35 .
  • the DBS system 5 is shown in FIG. 2A as including separate discrete blocks (e.g., 15 , 20 , 25 , 30 , and 35 ), other configurations are possible.
  • the functionality of one or more of the blocks 15 , 20 , 25 , 30 , and 35 can be combined into a single device and/or routine.
  • FIG. 1 deep brain stimulation
  • 2A includes a number of discrete blocks (e.g., 15 , 20 , 25 , 30 , and 35 ), certain blocks may be omitted in some configurations (e.g., pattern recognition system 15 and analog-to-digital converter 30 can be omitted in non-closed loop systems).
  • certain blocks may be omitted in some configurations (e.g., pattern recognition system 15 and analog-to-digital converter 30 can be omitted in non-closed loop systems).
  • the analog-to-digital converter 30 is configured to receive signals from the brain of the patient 10 via an electrical lead 40 operably coupled to an electrode 41 , and/or any other device that can measure neuronal activity (e.g., functional scanners).
  • the electrical lead 40 can be configured to be implanted intracranially in the brain of the patient 10 , although, the electrical lead 40 can be configured to measure electrical activity of the patient 10 in other areas (e.g., the VPL, hippocampus, and/or brain stem).
  • the electrical lead 40 is configured to be attached and/or in close proximity to a wide dynamic range (WDR) neuron in the brain of the patent 10 , although other neurons can be used.
  • WDR wide dynamic range
  • the WDR neuron is chosen as a function or psychological correlate of chronic pain being felt by the patient 10 .
  • the WDR neuron chosen can correspond to the portion of the body which the patient 10 feels chronic pain (e.g., a neuron corresponding to the right leg of a patient suffering from chronic pain in their right leg, technically defined as a “receptive field”).
  • the electrical lead 40 is configured to detect electrical activity in the brain of the patient 10 , and to relay the sensed information to the system 5 .
  • the analog-to-digital converter converts the signal into a form desired by the pattern recognition system 15 .
  • the pattern recognition system 15 is configured to monitor the signal provided by the electrical lead 40 to determine the presence of specific neuronal activity associated with chronic pain (e.g., the pain signatures identified in the exemplary data described herein).
  • the pattern recognition system 15 can be configured to detect an increase in spontaneous background firing, an increase in rate of firing evoked by external stimulus (e.g., pressure or pinch), rhythmic after-discharge signaling, rhythmic oscillation, abnormal bursting, etc.
  • electrical lead 40 is configured to detect neuronal activity (e.g., a pain signature) in the sensory thalamus (ventral posterolateral, VPL) of the brain of the patient 10 .
  • the pattern recognition system 15 can be configured to detect at least two different major types of neuronal activity spontaneous and evoked.
  • Spontaneous activity is typically independent or temporally not associated with the presentation of an overt stimulus or identifiable cause.
  • Spontaneous activity can best be described as an increase in the rate of spontaneous activity in pain subjects compared to na ⁇ ve/normal.
  • Evoked activity is typically activity correlated with an overt stimulus or identifiable cause.
  • Evoked activity can best be described as an increase in the rate of evoked activity in pain subjects in response to peripherally applied noxious and non-noxious cutaneous stimuli compared to na ⁇ ve/normal.
  • abnormal bursting activity can occur during both spontaneous and evoked firing in pain compared to na ⁇ ve/normal.
  • the pattern recognition system 15 is configured to communicate with the processor 20 , and is configured to provide information to the processor 20 in a predetermined format over a network connection (e.g., a bus or network connection in embodiments where the pattern recognition system 15 is separate from the processor 20 ).
  • the pattern recognition system 15 can be configured to perform various signal processing functions on the signals sensed from the patient 10 (e.g., frequency analysis, Fourier transform, inverse Fourier transform, filtering, de-noising, threshold analysis, analysis of interspike intervals, analysis of burst cycle periods, analysis of spikes within bursts, etc.).
  • the processor 20 can be configured to examine information provided by the pattern recognition system 15 to determine the appropriate response. For example, the processor 20 is configured to differentiate between various patterns that can be recognized by the pattern recognition system 15 and to determine an appropriate response. The processor 20 can differentiate between multiple recognized patterns, and determine an appropriate response strategy using, for example, a look-up table. The appropriate response can be nothing at all, or, for example, can be to cause an electrical signal to be provided to the brain of the patient 10 via an electrical lead 45 operably coupled to an electrode 46 .
  • the processor 20 can be configured to reverse the pain signature in the brain of the patient 10 using neurostimulation (or more accurately, neuromodulation).
  • neuromodulation can include the application of electricity of a predefined voltage, frequency, current, and duration to the brain of a patient 10 .
  • the neuromodulation applied to the brain of the patient 10 is configured to “jam” the neuronal activity of the patient 10 (i.e., rather than further stimulating it).
  • this neuromodulation is achieved by providing high frequency current (e.g., between 150-200 Hz, 1-3 volts, 1-3 mA, and substantially of 0.25-0.75 ms rectangular pulses of 1 second duration (assuming tissue impedance of 1000 ⁇ ).
  • the pain signature can transiently be reversed back to “normal.”
  • the neuromodulation protocol can be configured to transiently attenuate pain behavior in pain subjects to the level of that in na ⁇ ve/normal, while otherwise retaining tactile sensitivity. Electrical treatment is provided to the deep brain, the VPL, and/or WDR neurons.
  • One exemplary treatment protocol includes electrical stimulation of the brain of the patient 10 using periodic pulses of electricity.
  • intermittent pulses e.g., 1 pulse, every 1-3 hours
  • each of the pulses has a brief (e.g., 1 sec) duration, high frequency (e.g., 150-200 Hz), and a low voltage (e.g., 1.5-2 V).
  • each of these electrical pulses can “jam” the overactive circuitry in the brain of the patient 10 , based on the temporal profile characterized herein. For example, for 2-3 hours, pain symptoms can be temporarily relieved after providing an electrical pulse.
  • the system 5 can be open-loop and/or closed-loop.
  • the system 5 can be programmed to provide electrical therapy according to a predetermined protocol (e.g., frequency, duration, voltage, amperage) without the use of the pattern recognition system 15 and the analog-to-digital converter 30 .
  • a predetermined protocol e.g., frequency, duration, voltage, amperage
  • the treatment protocol can be stored in a memory that is connected to the processor 20 .
  • the system 5 preferably uses information received via, for example, the pattern recognition system 15 and the analog-to-digital converter 30 to treat cognitive, affective, and emotive neurological conditions, owing to the characterization of the pain signature described herein.
  • the closed-loop system described herein discusses the use of an electrical lead 40 implanted in the brain of the patient 10 , other configurations are possible (e.g., receiving diagnostic information from fMRI, or PET scanning). Additionally, while separate leads (e.g., leads 40 , 45 are discussed, a single lead could instead be used for sensing and provision of the electrical signals. Additionally, the system 5 can be controlled manually (e.g., by actuating a button, or via a remote connection.
  • Electrophysiological measurements of wide dynamic range (WDR) thalamic neurons in chronic constriction injury (CCI) rats indicate elevated evoked response to pressure and pinch stimuli in addition to rhythmic after-discharge signaling and an increase in spontaneous background firing ( FIGS. 3 and 4 ), in addition to abnormal burst.
  • Treatment efficacy was assessed in part based on the reversal of this known effect.
  • Deep Brain Stimulation of CCI animals resulted in an attenuation of mean firing rate in response to all forms of mechanical stimuli, in addition to a statistically significant decrease in afterdischarge ( FIGS. 7 and 8 ). Furthermore, behavioral testing of awake DBS rats in group 6 revealed a corresponding increase in withdrawal latency following high frequency DBS ( FIG. 9 ; data represent values normalized to pre-FHS or Baseline 100%).
  • FIG. 12 shows characterization of bursts in response to various stimuli.
  • the Requirements for defining bursts were:
  • CCI Chronic Constrictive Injury
  • the surgical procedure consisted of a modification of the original loose ligation model designed by Bennett and Xie. The process involved isolation of the sciatic nerve via blunt dissection of the biceps femoris followed by a unilateral loose ligation with 5-0 gauge chromic gut ligature at three sites above the branching of the nerve, 1 mm apart. The ligation initiates an inflammatory response that results in chromic gut constriction of the nerve. Following the surgery, overlying muscles and skin were closed with 4-0 nylon sutures and the rodents were allowed time for recovery. Thermal hyperalgesia resulting from CCI has been found to remain relatively constant for a period of 5-27 days following the injury.
  • Electrophysiology Single unit firing-unit recording (i.e. sampling neuronal activity one at a time) was recorded under deep anesthesia (1.5% Isoflurane). Extracellular single-unit recordings in and were made with a 0.005′′ 5M ⁇ Teflon-coated silver microelectrode (A-M Systems, Carlsborg, Wash.). DBS animals were implanted with a modified electrode as shown below ( FIGS. 14 , 15 , 16 ). Each subject was placed in a stereotaxic frame, and a limited craniotomy exposed the brain surface vertical to the recording sites within the VPL [Bregma ( ⁇ 3.3; ⁇ 2.5); lateral (2.8; 3.6); vertical (5.4; 6.4)] ( FIG. 16 ). Electrical signals were amplified and filtered at 3000 Hz and processed with a CED micro 1401 data acquisition system and SPIKE-2 software (Cambridge Electronic Design, Cambridge, England).
  • Waveforms were sorted to extract activity of a single neuron using automated template-matching.
  • a hydraulic micropositioning device Karlin, Lav., Japan
  • a single “unit” or neuron can be isolated by stimulating the suspected somatosensory receptive field via tapping, brushing, pinching the skin, or manipulating the limbs of the anesthetized subject until excitation at the location of the electrode tip is measured via changes in current. This process was used in order to identify VPL units innervated by the sciatic nerve. Spontaneous activity was then measured, followed by evoked responses to mechanical stimulation within the receptive field.
  • DBS After measurements of at least 2 consecutive series of recording spontaneous and evoked activities, the electrode was disconnected from the recording equipment. The cathode of an isolated pulse stimulator was connected to the electrode and the anode was connected to the skin of the rat at the base of the head, acting as a body ground. Preliminary rectangular pulses 0.5 ms in width were applied at a frequency of 100 Hz at 0.5V for 1 s. Immediately after stimulation, the electrode was disconnected from the stimulator and reconnected to the recording equipment and recording resumed. Background activity was recorded for 40 s and progressive mechanical stimuli as described above were then applied for a duration of 20 s each with 40 s rest in between each.
  • Behavioral tests of the CCI rats were performed with respect to thermal and mechanical stimulation in order to verify the presence of allodynia and hyperalgesia. Each animal was placed in a Plexiglas chamber situated on an elevated glass plate 30 minutes prior to testing for acclimatization.
  • the thermal behavioral test consists of focusing a radiant heat source (4.7 amps) through the glass floor onto the plantar surface of the rat's hind limb, resulting in withdrawal behavior.
  • the measured withdrawal latency is defined to begin at the onset of laser beam exposure and end upon movement of the rat hind paw from the floor surface. Five stimulation pulse events separated by 5 min were averaged for each hindpaw and reported as the withdrawal latency for a given session.
  • DBS electrodes were held in place with orthodontic resin and microelectrode leads were stored in a small plastic container surgically implanted at the base of the skull during behavioral trials. All DBS behavioral testing animals received initial stimulation at 1.5V and 200 Hz within 6-8 days post surgery. Baseline pre-operative behavioral data was recorded for analysis beginning one day prior to initial neurostimulation. Following the DBS event, behavioral tests were repeated 5 minutes and 30 minutes post treatment.
  • supplementary postmortem tissue analysis was used to identify the activation levels of glial cells in the region of interest. This provided the opportunity to assess microgliosis and astrogliosis associated with glial scarring.
  • animals are anesthetized (5% isoflurane) and transcardially perfused with ice cold phosphate buffered saline (PBS) supplemented with 10 USP units of anticoagulant Heparin Sulfate for 5 minutes (10 ml/min) followed by cooled 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in PBS for 5 minutes (10 ml/min). This fixation process was used in order to preserve nervous tissue form degradation.
  • PBS ice cold phosphate buffered saline
  • PFA paraformaldehyde
  • the head was stored in PFA over night.
  • the brains were then removed and stored in cold 30% sucrose until fully impregnated.
  • the formalin-fixed brains were blocked in the desired orientation and placed in tissue-embedding media (O.C.T. Compound 4583, Tissue-Tek). Brains were stored at ⁇ 80 degrees Fahrenheit and cut into 30 ⁇ m sections with a microtome. These sections (ranging from Bregma ⁇ 2.12 mm to ⁇ 4.16 mm) were mounted on slides, dried, and stained with OX-42 or GFAP for further analysis of microglia or actrocytes, respectively.
  • the subject matter described herein can be implemented in digital electronic circuitry, or in computer software, firmware, or hardware, including the structural means disclosed in this specification and structural equivalents thereof, or in combinations of them.
  • the subject matter described herein can be implemented as one or more computer program products, such as one or more computer programs tangibly embodied in an information carrier (e.g., in a machine-readable storage device), or embodied in a propagated signal, for execution by, or to control the operation of, data processing apparatus (e.g., a programmable processor, a computer, or multiple computers).
  • a computer program (also known as a program, software, software application, or code) can be written in any form of programming language, including compiled or interpreted languages, and it can be deployed in any form, including as a stand-alone program or as a module, component, subroutine, or other unit suitable for use in a computing environment.
  • a computer program does not necessarily correspond to a file.
  • a program can be stored in a portion of a file that holds other programs or data, in a single file dedicated to the program in question, or in multiple coordinated files (e.g., files that store one or more modules, sub-programs, or portions of code).
  • a computer program can be deployed to be executed on one computer or on multiple computers at one site or distributed across multiple sites and interconnected by a communication network.
  • processors suitable for the execution of a computer program include, by way of example, both general and special purpose microprocessors, and any one or more processor of any kind of digital computer.
  • a processor will receive instructions and data from a read-only memory or a random access memory or both.
  • the essential elements of a computer are a processor for executing instructions and one or more memory devices for storing instructions and data.
  • a computer will also include, or be operatively coupled to receive data from or transfer data to, or both, one or more mass storage devices for storing data, e.g., magnetic, magneto optical disks, or optical disks.
  • Information carriers suitable for embodying computer program instructions and data include all forms of non-volatile memory, including by way of example semiconductor memory devices, (e.g., EPROM, EEPROM, and flash memory devices); magnetic disks, (e.g., internal hard disks or removable disks); magneto optical disks; and optical disks (e.g., CD and DVD disks).
  • semiconductor memory devices e.g., EPROM, EEPROM, and flash memory devices
  • magnetic disks e.g., internal hard disks or removable disks
  • magneto optical disks e.g., CD and DVD disks
  • optical disks e.g., CD and DVD disks.
  • the processor and the memory can be supplemented by, or incorporated in, special purpose logic circuitry.
  • the subject matter described herein can be implemented on a computer having a display device, e.g., a CRT (cathode ray tube) or LCD (liquid crystal display) monitor, for displaying information to the user and a keyboard and a pointing device, (e.g., a mouse or a trackball), by which the user can provide input to the computer.
  • a display device e.g., a CRT (cathode ray tube) or LCD (liquid crystal display) monitor
  • a keyboard and a pointing device e.g., a mouse or a trackball
  • Other kinds of devices can be used to provide for interaction with a user as well.
  • feedback provided to the user can be any form of sensory feedback, (e.g., visual feedback, auditory feedback, or tactile feedback), and input from the user can be received in any form, including acoustic, speech, or tactile input.
  • the subject matter described herein can be implemented in a computing system that includes a back-end component (e.g., a data server), a middleware component (e.g., an application server), or a front-end component (e.g., a client computer having a graphical user interface or a web browser through which a user can interact with an implementation of the subject matter described herein), or any combination of such back-end, middleware, and front-end components.
  • the components of the system can be interconnected by any form or medium of digital data communication, e.g., a communication network. Examples of communication networks include a local area network (“LAN”) and a wide area network (“WAN”), e.g., the Internet.
  • LAN local area network
  • WAN wide area network
  • Neuropathic pain secondary to nerve injury is often chronic and accompanied by dysesthesias. It is linked to long-term changes in neuronal physiology, known as neuroplasticity, which is well described in peripheral nerves and the spinal cord but relatively less understood in the brain. In spite of recent advances in pharmacotherapy, neuropathic pain remains poorly managed.
  • VPL ventral posterolateral
  • Nociceptive neurons in the VPL receive ascending projections mainly from spinothalamic tract neurons and project to several cortical areas including the primary somatosensory cortex.
  • a group of neurons responds to a wide dynamic range (WDR) of mechanical stimuli, phenotypically homologous to WDR neurons at spinal cord level whose role in central sensitization and chronic pain is well documented.
  • WDR wide dynamic range
  • DBS deep brain stimulation
  • FDA Food and Drug Administration
  • stimulation frequency represents a key factor, with high frequency stimulation (HFS, >100 Hz) mimicking the functional effects of ablation, also referred to as ‘jamming’ of local circuitry.
  • HFS in the VPL reduces mechanical allodynia in rats with peripheral neuropathy.
  • HFS can be used to inhibit hyperactive VPL neurons, thus reversing neuroplasticity and, consequently, behavioral hypersensitivity.
  • the firing of single units extracellularly from VPL neurons in na ⁇ ve rats was recorded. Firing from neuropathic rats after chronic constriction injury (CCI) of the sciatic nerve was also recorded. The data show that tonic and burst firing patterns in rats with CCI were significantly different from those in na ⁇ ve rats and were partially reversed after microstimulation in the VPL at high (but not low) frequency, with subsequent attenuation of hyperalgesia.
  • CCI Chronic constriction injury
  • the head was fixed in a stereotaxic apparatus (Kopf Instruments, Tujunga, Calif., USA) and skin incision and a limited craniotomy exposed the brain surface vertical to the recording sites within the thalamus.
  • Neuronal units were isolated from the VPL nuclei of the thalamus [respective stereotaxic coordinates in mm: bregma ( ⁇ 3.3, ⁇ 2.5); lateral (2.8, 3.6); vertical (5.4, 6.4)]. Extracellular single-unit recordings were made with a 5 M ⁇ Teflon-coated tungsten microelectrode (A-M Systems, Carlsborg, Wash., USA).
  • Cursors were also set at the beginning of the trace and after 40 s (baseline or un-evoked firing), and the spikes occurring during this period were summed to provide a measure of the background activity. The two sums were divided by the respective duration and the resulting averages (spikes/s) subtracted to yield the value attributed to the response (total number of spikes/s in excess of the background activity during the stimulus).
  • spikes/s averages subtracted to yield the value attributed to the response (total number of spikes/s in excess of the background activity during the stimulus).
  • One to two neurons with individually mapped receptive field were recorded from each rat. Neuronal activity was analyzed off-line using Spike2.
  • the spinal cord was also exposed by laminectomy at thoracic (T4-T6) level and topical 2% lidocaine was applied using a cotton pledget to the dorsal and lateral surfaces of the spinal cord, followed 10 min later by complete cord transection using fine scissor while recording from the VPL neuron continued.
  • Burst events were identified using Spike 2 Burst script using the following criteria: 6 ms of the maximum interval between two events that signifies the start of a burst, 9 ms of the longest interval between two events within a burst, and 2 of the minimum number of events in a burst. The following parameters were calculated during the recording periods of background activity, six natural mechanical stimuli evoked discharges and after discharge: Number of burst events, mean inter burst time (ms), and % spikes in burst:
  • Micro-stimulation in the VPL To test the effect of microstimulation on neuronal firing in anesthetized rats, the same recording electrode was used for microstimulation within the VPL. After identifying single units and recording pre-stimulation (baseline) firing rates, the electrode was disconnected from the recording equipment and connected to a stimulator (A-M Systems Isolated Pulse Stimulator). Rectangular pulses 0.5 ms width were applied at a frequency of 100 Hz at 0.5 V for 1 s. Immediately after stimulation, the electrode was disconnected from the stimulator and reconnected to the recording equipment and data acquisition resumed within 2-3 min after baseline measurements.
  • A-M Systems Isolated Pulse Stimulator A-M Systems Isolated Pulse Stimulator
  • bipolar silver wires ( ⁇ 1.5 K ⁇ ) were chronically implanted on the day of CCI. Electrode segments were fused together with Epoxy resin forming cathode and anode. Teflon coating was removed exposing 0.5 mm on each electrode tip, which were separated by 1 mm from tip-to-tip vertically. Initially, the longer tip was connected to the recording equipment and local field potentials were recorded to localize the VPL area with a receptive field in the contralateral hindpaw (see description below for additional details on the orientation of the electrodes relative to the VPL for optimal steering of electric field and overlap with VPL nuclear structure).
  • Rats were anesthetized with pentobarbital (60 mg/kg, i.p.) then perfused intracardially with ice-cold PBS followed by buffered 4% paraformaldehyde. Brains were post-fixed with buffered 4% paraformaldehyde overnight, equilibrated in 30% sucrose, and frozen to ⁇ 80° C. in OCT cryogenic compound (TissueTek Sakura). Coronal sections (30 ⁇ m) were adhered to glass slides and blocked with goat serum. Sections were stained for OX-42 (Santa Cruz Biotech, mouse IgG, 1:50), or GFAP (Chemicon International, mouse IgG, 1:100) overnight at 4° C.
  • Extracellularly recorded action potentials were isolated from single units in the VPL nucleus of the thalamus under deep anesthesia using template matching techniques. All units discharged action potentials at relatively constant voltage amplitudes and responded with increased firing rates to contralateral mechanical stimuli.
  • peristimulus time histogram shows increased firing rate when noxious and non-noxious stimuli are applied to the receptive field in the contralateral hindpaw, noting a graded response to increased strengths of von Frey filaments, compared to almost absent spontaneous firing ( FIG. 18A , upper panel). Seven days after CCI, evoked responses to pressure and pinch stimuli are increased, while spontaneous activity and afterdischarge are elevated ( FIG. 18A , lower panel).
  • Plasticity manifests as selective hyperexcitability in response to non-noxious pressure and noxious pinch, in addition to an emergence of un-evoked firing at a high rate.
  • evoked responses to von Frey filaments 0.6, 8 and 15 g
  • pressure and pinch of VPL neurons with somatic receptive fields excluding the hindpaws in rats with CCI were not significantly different from corresponding values in na ⁇ ve rats, except for a significant increase in brush-evoked responses after CCI, whereas spontaneous activity and afterdischarge were less than 1 Hz in both na ⁇ ve and CCI rats ( FIG. 25 ).
  • FIG. 19A shows a peristimulus rate histogram of the same unit superimposed over a sinusoidal curve during the period of rhythmic oscillation (before transection) compared to nearly flat rate histogram after transection.
  • HFS HFS was delivered through the recording electrode and the rate of firing was measured before and after micro stimulation.
  • graded attenuation of evoked firing was achieved with incremental increase in voltage amplitude at 100 Hz and a prominent effect was noted at 1.5 V, whereas spontaneous activity was not affected ( FIG. 20A ).
  • Results with 100 Hz and 200 Hz were comparable and therefore pooled together collectively. All mean firing rates were significantly decreased up to approximately ⁇ 50% within 10-15 min after HFS for all firing modes except spontaneous activity ( FIG. 20C and Table 2).
  • FIG. 21 shows examples of burst firing during brush-evoked responses from a na ⁇ ve rat and another rat seven days after CCI.
  • spontaneous bursts events were almost absent, whereas those in rats with CCI were increased in number ( FIG. 22 and Table 3).
  • Spontaneous bursts were detected in only 2 out of 14 units from na ⁇ ve rats (mean burst events 0.4 ⁇ 0.3). Therefore burst parameters during spontaneous activity in na ⁇ ve rats were not analyzed.
  • burst events were increased significantly for all firing modes in rats with CCI compared to those in na ⁇ ve rats, which were attenuated after HFS with significant changes for pressure and pinch-evoked responses ( FIG. 22 and Table 3). Similar trends were observed between groups for percent spikes in burst values, whereas changes in the opposite directions were noted for mean interburst time values (i.e. values decreased for all firing modes in rats with CCI compared to those in na ⁇ ve rats and were increased after HFS). In general, therefore, bursting patterns consistently deviated from normal after sciatic neuropathy reaching significant levels. These changes were consistently reversed in the normal direction after HFS, indicating that HFS reverses several aberrant features of neuroplasticity including tonic and burst firing properties.
  • withdrawal latency in the injured hindpaw remained decreased compared to the non-injured hindpaw ( FIG. 24B ).
  • withdrawal latency in the injured hindpaw was transiently reversed 5 min after HFS with reproducible effects after 2 hr.
  • the mean withdrawal latency was transiently and significantly reversed from 6.3 ⁇ 0.9 s to 9.1 ⁇ 0.1 s and 7.3 ⁇ 0.1 s at 5 min and 10 min after HFS, respectively, in the injured hindpaw.
  • the withdrawal latency in the non-injured hindpaw also increased after HFS, however, this change was not significant ( FIG. 27 ).
  • GFAP and OX-42 were quantified in tissue sections in or around the tip of the chronically implanted electrodes in the VPL, which revealed no significant changes in expression compared to the contralateral VPL ( FIG. 28 ), indicating limited glial reactivity to electrode implantation and HFS.
  • Peripheral neuropathic injury is associated with neuroplasticity of VPL neurons with receptive fields in the contralateral injured hindpaw.
  • Abnormal physiologic properties include higher rate of spontaneous firing, increased rates of afterdischarge and evoked firing in response to non-noxious and noxious mechanical stimuli.
  • significant changes in burst firing and rhythmic oscillations were observed. Otherwise, the firing of neurons with receptive fields elsewhere in the body was not changed, except for increased responses to brush stimuli.
  • VPL neurons Hyper-responsiveness, rhythmic oscillations and bursting in VPL neurons are observed in a rat model of central neuropathic pain following spinal cord contusion. Relative to neuronal firing in normal rats, firing in rats with spinal lesion alternated between simple, burst and spindle epochs, whereas the number of spikes per burst decreased and interburst interval was not changed. Compared to this study, different lesion sites (sciatic versus spinal) likely account for the incompletely matching patterns of aberrant firing in the VPL.
  • burst spikes and isolated spikes both contribute to the coding of stimulus-related information (Middleton J W, Yu N, Longtin A, Maler L (2011) Routing the flow of sensory signals using plastic responses to bursts and isolated spikes: experiment and theory. J Neurosci 31:2461-2473; hereby incorporated by reference). Therefore, burst firing is an important feature of the neural code and can effectively impact postsynaptic neurons, including upstream from the VPL in the somatosensory cortex. Bursting can be modulated by the temporal frequency content of incoming signals, which in the case of peripheral neuropathy is significantly altered at peripheral and spinal cord levels.
  • bursts and the relative timing of burst spikes can encode specific stimulus features. Neurons in the lateral geniculate nucleus discharge bursts and isolated spikes in response to visual stimuli, with different stimulus conditions preferentially evoking different bursting patterns. Bursting has also been reported in thalamocortical projection cells, including the auditory and the somatosensory systems. Although the functional significance of bursting in VPL neurons and modulation thereof under chronic pain conditions are unknown, interestingly, short-term plasticity of thalamocortical synapses is thought to accentuate the sensitivity of cortical responses to ascending sensory input.
  • Burst firing has been documented in the ventral thalamus in a patient with root injury and occurred during episodes of self-reported touch-evoked allodynia. Direct microstimulation within a thalamic nucleus that contains abnormally active neurons produces burning dysesthesia in patients with spinal deafferentation pain, as well as with root injury pain, whereas microstimulation in the same area might also produce pain relief. These observations suggest that the aberrant physiology of thalamic cells may be directly related to the dysesthesias, whereas the functional outcome depends on the pain condition and the neuro stimulation protocol. It's worth noting that changes in the patterns of burst firing, rather than burst firing pre se, might be a reliable marker for pain-related plasticity. For example, burst firing can occur in deafferented subjects without pain.
  • HFS in CCI rats caused a ‘reversal’ effect on abnormal bursting patterns in the direction of normal condition, showing consistent results across all firing modalities. This is in agreement with the premise that HFS in the therapeutic range for motor disorders works mainly by inhibiting neuronal firing or neuronal ‘jamming’.
  • the data described herein relates to hyperactive neurons in the VPL and a comparison of the effects of HFS and LFS on neuronal firing at the single unit level. Whereas HFS effectively reversed neuronal hyper-responsiveness, spontaneous activity did not change and overall responsiveness to mechanical stimuli was diminished but not abolished. Prior to the invention, no study compared the effects of varying stimulation frequency on analgesia.
  • Neurons in the PAG known to mediate descending anti-nociceptive control unto lumbar dorsal horn neurons, could be activated by electrical stimulation in the VPL, an influence which is not affected by systemic administration of naloxone, suggesting that the VPL-PAG analgesic pathway is unlikely to involve the opioid system.
  • This mechanism provides an alternative explanation to the widely held idea that the analgesic effects of subcortical brain stimulation is the result of activation of a descending ‘pain suppressive system’ concentrated in the periventricular and periaqueductal regions, which blocks nociceptive transmission at the level of the spinal cord.
  • STT neurons in the spinal cord are inhibited bilaterally by low current ( ⁇ 25 ⁇ A) high frequency (333 Hz) stimulation in the VPL unilaterally, in support of data described herein showing increased withdrawal thresholds in both hindpaws in response to unilateral microstimulation in the VPL.
  • VPL stimulation may cause sufficient input to the somatosensory cortex to activate corticofugal inhibitory pathways, following thalamocortical-corticofugal projections inhibiting spinal cord nociceptive neurons. It is also possible that VPL stimulation activates antidromically axon collaterals of STT neurons projecting to the medial brain stem, including the PAG and nucleus Raphe Magnus, thus resulting in analgesic effects.
  • Low-voltage stimulation in the VPL at high frequency can locally inhibit VPL neurons and subsequently the transmission of nociceptive signals to cortical areas.
  • the mechanisms include one or a combination of causes such as ‘jamming’ of a local nociceptive circuitry, activation of inhibitory structures within a wider network, blockade of membrane ion channels such as voltage-gated currents, depolarization blockade, synaptic exhaustion, and induction of early genes.
  • Neuropathic pain is a neurological disorder that, prior to the invention, lacked a reliable diagnostic.
  • the methods and systems of the invention provide a solution to a long-standing problem in pain management.
  • An objective measure for pain leads to more accurate diagnosis, monitoring and optimizing therapeutics, thus ameliorating overall clinical outcome.
  • a physiological correlate of pain is useful in the design of closed-loop neuromodulation systems.
  • LFP Local field potential
  • multiunit activity are extracellularly recorded signals from a local network of neurons.
  • LFP represents the low-frequency ( ⁇ 0.5 kHz) content of the raw recording generated by membrane currents of the neurons in a local neighborhood of the recording electrode, whereas the high frequency (>1 kHz) content represents neuronal action potential spiking.
  • the coordinated activity of cell populations is reflected by regular oscillations in LFPs, which has been proposed as a mechanism to optimize the recording and analysis of network functions.
  • LFP is a good candidate for ‘pain signature’.
  • field potentials Initially studied in great detail owing to their ease of recording with non-invasive macroelectrodes, field potentials contain informative signals measured out of the pool of a large number of spiking neurons while relating to sensory and motor phenomena. Changes in field potentials are triggered by external events (evoked potentials) when induced by a stimulus (e.g. noxious mechanical stimulus or non-noxious tactile stimulus) or by internal cortical dynamics (intrinsic oscillations or rhythms) due to thought processes (e.g. spontaneous pain).
  • evoked potentials induced by a stimulus
  • cortical dynamics intrinsic oscillations or rhythms
  • LFP intracortically
  • EcoG electrodes supracortically
  • EEG scalp
  • MEG magnetoencephalograhy
  • the amount of information contained within a brain signal diminishes as it passes from intra- to extra-cellular, from single to multiunit to field potentials, and from LFP to ECoG to EEG to MEG. Many have recently argued in favor of balancing optimal information content with less invasive recording for translational purposes.
  • FIGS. 30 , 31 , 32 Data showing pain-related brain activity is described below ( FIGS. 30 , 31 , 32 .
  • Characteristic burst firing is recorded from the thalamus of patients with neuropathic pain ( FIG. 30 ). This bursting pattern closely resembles that recorded from the thalamus of an animal model of neuropathic deafferentation pain ( FIG. 31 ), whereby reversal of this neuronal activity was associated with attenuation of pain behavior.
  • a series of psychiatric disorders may be associated with thalamocortical dysrhythmia (TCD).
  • TCD thalamocortical dysrhythmia
  • Synchrony of thalamic and cortical networks under normal conditions are thought to underlie consciousness, whereby state-dependant (sensory or cognitive state) rhythms of thalamocortical relay neurons are continuously driven by corticothalamic input resulting in oscillation, thus binding sensory or cognitive events in a unified percept.
  • Some neurological disorders can lead to disregulation of calcium channels in the brain, thus causing abnormal calcium spiking and high frequency burst in thalamic reticular nuclei, paradoxically driving the thalamocortical network into lower frequency oscillation (4-10 Hz) ( FIG. 32 ).
  • LFP which is intermediate in terms of information content
  • Neurons at multiple stages of the somatosensory pathway display oscillations at 7-12 Hz, including in somatosensory cortex (S1) and the ventral posterior nucleus of the thalamus. Therefore, pain is associated with a characteristic pattern of brain activity embodied in LFPs, which is useful for objective diagnosis and as well input signal in a closed-loop technology for pain therapy. Pain-related LFP can be reversed by spinal cord stimulation (SCS) or peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS), thus closing the loop of a hypothetical automated system.
  • SCS spinal cord stimulation
  • PNS peripheral nerve stimulation
  • the pain model utilized chronic constriction injury of the sciatic nerve. This is a widely used model of mononeuropathy that yields reliable pain behavior in rats. Rats are deeply anesthetized with isoflurane (1.5-2%) and the sciatic nerve is loosely ligated with 4 chromic gut (4-0) sutures. After CCI, the overlying muscles and skin are closed in layers with 4-0 nylon sutures.
  • Pain behavioral is tested daily to determine mechanical and thermal sensory thresholds. Pre-operative testing generally begins 2 days prior to CCI and once per day for 10 days after CCI.
  • Mechanical sensory thresholds are determined by the standard Dixon up-down method utilizing a series of von Frey filaments applied to the glaborous surface of the paw.
  • Thermal hyperalgesia is measured by latency of paw withdrawal in response to a radiant heat source. Rats are placed in Plexiglas boxes on an elevated glass plate under which a radiant heat source (4.7 amps) is applied to the plantar surface of the paw and rats are free to escape from applied stimuli. The temperature that the paw can be subjected to can reach a maximum of 57° C. for a transient time of less than 3 sec. Rats that don't display significant pain behavior are excluded from the study.
  • Electrophysiology evaluations are carried out as follows. After confirming pain behavior, a minimal craniotomy at day 7 after CCI/sham under deep anesthesia (3% isoflurane) exposes the cortical surface vertically above the VPL or somatosensory cortex (SI) identified according to a rat brain atlas. LFP recordings (CED 1401) are made using a tungsten microelectrode (125 ⁇ m, 12 M ⁇ ) by low-pass filtering of the extracellular field potential below 300 Hz. Microelectrodes are positioned stereotaxically in areas of the VPL or SI with identifiable receptive fields in the injured dermatome (hindpaw on the side of CCI).
  • LFP recordings were made under deep barbiturate anesthesia from the ventral posterolateral (VPL) nucleus of the thalamus bilaterally, with the side ipsilateral to injury serving as control (receiving ascending information predominantly from the un-injured paw).
  • VPL ventral posterolateral
  • the location of the microelectrode was confirmed by stereotaxic coordinates (according to a rat brain Atlas) and by increased in background firing in response to gentle brushing of the corresponding receptive field in the contralateral paw ( FIG. 33 ).
  • FIG. 34 A reported leftward shift in MEG power spectrum of spontaneous activity in patients with chronic pain compared to control is in agreement with FIG. 34 (left panels).
  • Thalamic LFP recordings from patients with Tourette Syndrome a cognitive/movement disorder, emphasized a significant correlation between the main LFP frequency and the frequency of single-unit interbursts.
  • Data described herein shows that the mean interburst period of single-unit brush-evoked activity recorded from the VPL is approximately 400 ms for animals with CCI and 100 ms for na ⁇ ve, thus predicting a rightward shift in power spectra from 2.5 to 10 Hz after CCI, exactly matching with what we show in FIG. 34 (right panels).

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
  • Nuclear Medicine, Radiotherapy & Molecular Imaging (AREA)
  • Radiology & Medical Imaging (AREA)
  • Neurosurgery (AREA)
  • Neurology (AREA)
  • Biophysics (AREA)
  • Heart & Thoracic Surgery (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Surgery (AREA)
  • Pathology (AREA)
  • Psychiatry (AREA)
  • Medical Informatics (AREA)
  • Pain & Pain Management (AREA)
  • Psychology (AREA)
  • Hospice & Palliative Care (AREA)
  • Physiology (AREA)
  • Electrotherapy Devices (AREA)
  • Measurement And Recording Of Electrical Phenomena And Electrical Characteristics Of The Living Body (AREA)
  • Medicines That Contain Protein Lipid Enzymes And Other Medicines (AREA)
US13/643,670 2010-04-27 2011-04-27 Peripheral pain management Active US8977362B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US13/643,670 US8977362B2 (en) 2010-04-27 2011-04-27 Peripheral pain management

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US32858310P 2010-04-27 2010-04-27
PCT/US2011/034203 WO2011137193A1 (fr) 2010-04-27 2011-04-27 Gestion de la douleur
US13/643,670 US8977362B2 (en) 2010-04-27 2011-04-27 Peripheral pain management

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2011/034203 A-371-Of-International WO2011137193A1 (fr) 2010-04-27 2011-04-27 Gestion de la douleur

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US14/632,420 Continuation US9486632B2 (en) 2010-04-27 2015-02-26 Pain management

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20130066394A1 US20130066394A1 (en) 2013-03-14
US8977362B2 true US8977362B2 (en) 2015-03-10

Family

ID=44861905

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/643,670 Active US8977362B2 (en) 2010-04-27 2011-04-27 Peripheral pain management
US14/632,420 Active US9486632B2 (en) 2010-04-27 2015-02-26 Pain management

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US14/632,420 Active US9486632B2 (en) 2010-04-27 2015-02-26 Pain management

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (2) US8977362B2 (fr)
EP (1) EP2563462B1 (fr)
JP (1) JP2013525029A (fr)
AU (1) AU2011245359B2 (fr)
CA (1) CA2797701C (fr)
WO (1) WO2011137193A1 (fr)

Cited By (17)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9402558B2 (en) 2007-04-05 2016-08-02 New York University System and method for pain detection and computation of a pain quantification index
EP3727570A1 (fr) * 2017-12-20 2020-10-28 Galvani Bioelectronics Limited Traitement des troubles associés à l'inflammation
US11273283B2 (en) 2017-12-31 2022-03-15 Neuroenhancement Lab, LLC Method and apparatus for neuroenhancement to enhance emotional response
US11364361B2 (en) 2018-04-20 2022-06-21 Neuroenhancement Lab, LLC System and method for inducing sleep by transplanting mental states
US11452839B2 (en) 2018-09-14 2022-09-27 Neuroenhancement Lab, LLC System and method of improving sleep
US11717686B2 (en) 2017-12-04 2023-08-08 Neuroenhancement Lab, LLC Method and apparatus for neuroenhancement to facilitate learning and performance
US11723579B2 (en) 2017-09-19 2023-08-15 Neuroenhancement Lab, LLC Method and apparatus for neuroenhancement
US11730963B2 (en) 2018-04-09 2023-08-22 Neuros Medical, Inc. Apparatuses and methods for setting an electrical dose
US11752331B2 (en) 2017-12-13 2023-09-12 Neuros Medical, Inc. Nerve cuff deployment devices
US11786694B2 (en) 2019-05-24 2023-10-17 NeuroLight, Inc. Device, method, and app for facilitating sleep
US11878172B2 (en) 2020-02-11 2024-01-23 Neuros Medical, Inc. System and method for quantifying qualitative patient-reported data sets
WO2024081829A1 (fr) * 2022-10-13 2024-04-18 Case Western Reserve University Gestion de la douleur par stimulation de la moelle épinière ventrale
US12011597B2 (en) 2011-05-19 2024-06-18 Neuros Medical, Inc. Nerve cuff electrode for neuromodulation in large human nerve trunks
US12083340B2 (en) 2017-12-20 2024-09-10 Galvani Bioelectronics Limited Treatment of acute medical conditions
US12121718B2 (en) 2017-12-20 2024-10-22 Galvani Bioelectronics Limited Treatment of acute medical conditions
US12280219B2 (en) 2017-12-31 2025-04-22 NeuroLight, Inc. Method and apparatus for neuroenhancement to enhance emotional response
US12296171B2 (en) 2017-12-20 2025-05-13 Galvani Bioelectronics Limited Stimulation of a nerve supplying the spleen

Families Citing this family (54)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8750857B2 (en) * 2010-06-04 2014-06-10 Qualcomm Incorporated Method and apparatus for wireless distributed computing
US10112040B2 (en) 2011-11-15 2018-10-30 Neurometrix, Inc. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation using novel unbalanced biphasic waveform and novel electrode arrangement
US10279179B2 (en) 2013-04-15 2019-05-07 Neurometrix, Inc. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator with automatic detection of user sleep-wake state
PL2780073T3 (pl) 2011-11-15 2018-05-30 Neurometrix, Inc. Aparat do łagodzenia bólu z zastosowaniem przezskórnej elektrostymulacji nerwów
US11247040B2 (en) 2011-11-15 2022-02-15 Neurometrix, Inc. Dynamic control of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation therapy using continuous sleep detection
US9827420B2 (en) 2013-03-29 2017-11-28 Neurometrix, Inc. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator with user gesture detector and electrode-skin contact detector, with transient motion detector for increasing the accuracy of the same
US10335595B2 (en) 2011-11-15 2019-07-02 Neurometrix, Inc. Dynamic control of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation therapy using continuous sleep detection
US11259744B2 (en) 2011-11-15 2022-03-01 Neurometrix, Inc. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator with automatic detection of leg orientation and leg motion for enhanced sleep analysis, including enhanced transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) using the same
US9675801B2 (en) 2011-11-15 2017-06-13 Neurometrix, Inc. Measuring the “on-skin” time of a transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator (TENS) device in order to minimize skin irritation due to excessive uninterrupted wearing of the same
US9119965B2 (en) 2012-04-09 2015-09-01 Pacesetter, Inc. Systems and methods for controlling spinal cord stimulation to improve stimulation efficacy for use by implantable medical devices
US9833614B1 (en) 2012-06-22 2017-12-05 Nevro Corp. Autonomic nervous system control via high frequency spinal cord modulation, and associated systems and methods
WO2014076698A1 (fr) 2012-11-13 2014-05-22 Elminda Ltd. Analyse de données neurophysiologiques utilisant un morcellement spatio-temporel
CN105377359B (zh) 2013-03-29 2019-02-01 Gsk消费者健康有限公司 使用电极-皮肤阻抗来检测皮肤电极脱落
US10940311B2 (en) 2013-03-29 2021-03-09 Neurometrix, Inc. Apparatus and method for button-free control of a wearable transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator using interactive gestures and other means
CN105431196B (zh) 2013-04-15 2019-02-01 Gsk消费者健康有限公司 具有用户睡眠—觉醒状态的自动检测的经皮电神经刺激器
US10327663B2 (en) * 2013-08-31 2019-06-25 Alpha Omega Neuro Technologies Ltd. Evoked response probe and method of use
JP6033754B2 (ja) * 2013-10-21 2016-11-30 株式会社クラレ 多層中間膜
US9713433B2 (en) 2013-11-13 2017-07-25 Elminda Ltd. Method and system for managing pain
WO2016057212A1 (fr) * 2014-09-22 2016-04-14 Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation Dispositifs et procédés d'utilisation du spectre d'énergie ou de l'association de signaux pour la gestion de la douleur
EP3197350B1 (fr) 2014-09-28 2019-11-06 Elminda Ltd. Configuration d'outil de stimulation cérébrale
SG11201705499VA (en) * 2015-01-10 2017-08-30 Deborah Dullen Method and apparatus for the measurement of autonomic function for the diagnosis and validation of patient treatments and outcomes
US11103696B2 (en) 2015-05-05 2021-08-31 Cosmo Haralambidis Device for electrical stimulation of peridontal complex and surrounding tissue
CN107847742B (zh) 2015-05-05 2021-09-07 C·哈拉兰比迪斯 用于电刺激牙周复合体和周围组织的装置
US11298502B2 (en) 2015-11-23 2022-04-12 Sana Health, Inc. Non-pharmaceutical methods of mitigating addiction withdrawal symptoms
US11524135B2 (en) 2015-11-23 2022-12-13 Sana Health Inc. Non-pharmaceutical systems and methods of treating the symptoms of fibromyalgia
US11400252B2 (en) * 2015-11-23 2022-08-02 Sana Heath Inc. Non-pharmaceutical method of managing pain
JP7269010B2 (ja) 2015-11-23 2023-05-08 サナ ヘルス インコーポレイテッド 脳に刺激を与えるための方法およびシステム
AU2017297399B2 (en) 2016-07-13 2020-04-09 GSK Consumer Healthcare S.A. Apparatus and method for automated compensation of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for temporal fluctuations such as circadian rhythms
WO2018063912A1 (fr) 2016-09-27 2018-04-05 Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation Systèmes et procédés pour la prise en charge de la douleur en boucle fermée
EP3932298A1 (fr) 2016-09-27 2022-01-05 Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation Système de prise en charge de la douleur au moyen d'une mesure objective de la douleur
CN110418659B (zh) 2016-12-23 2023-12-19 纽诺麦斯股份有限公司 用于经皮电神经刺激（tens）的“智能”电极组件
WO2018132529A1 (fr) 2017-01-11 2018-07-19 Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation Gestion de la douleur basée sur la surveillance de l'activité cérébrale
US10631777B2 (en) 2017-01-11 2020-04-28 Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation Pain management based on functional measurements
US10926091B2 (en) 2017-01-11 2021-02-23 Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation Pain management based on emotional expression measurements
US11089997B2 (en) 2017-01-11 2021-08-17 Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation Patient-specific calibration of pain quantification
US20180272132A1 (en) 2017-01-19 2018-09-27 Nevro Corp. High frequency stimulation for treating sensory and/or motor deficits in patients with spinal cord injuries and/or peripheral polyneuropathy, and associated systems and methods
US10960210B2 (en) 2017-02-10 2021-03-30 Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation Method and apparatus for pain management with sleep detection
AU2018226818B2 (en) 2017-03-02 2022-03-17 Sana Health, Inc. Methods and systems for modulating stimuli to the brain with biosensors
US11058877B2 (en) 2017-05-30 2021-07-13 Neurometrix, Inc. Apparatus and method for the automated control of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation based on current and forecasted weather conditions
USD837394S1 (en) 2017-07-11 2019-01-01 Neurometrix, Inc. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) device
EP3936185A1 (fr) 2017-07-18 2022-01-12 Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation Systèmes et procédés de gestion de la douleur basés sur des capteurs
USD865986S1 (en) 2017-09-21 2019-11-05 Neurometrix, Inc. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation device strap
EP3700617A4 (fr) 2017-10-25 2021-08-04 Epineuron Technologies Inc. Systèmes et procédés d'administration de thérapie anti-neurodégénérative
US10589089B2 (en) 2017-10-25 2020-03-17 Epineuron Technologies Inc. Systems and methods for delivering neuroregenerative therapy
WO2019099887A1 (fr) 2017-11-17 2019-05-23 Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation Systèmes et procédés pour produire une stimulation intermittente au moyen de systèmes de stimulation électrique
AU2019245336B2 (en) 2018-03-29 2025-02-20 Nevro Corp. Therapeutic modulation to treat blood glucose abnormalities, including type 2 diabetes, and/or reduce HHA1C levels, and associated systems and methods
USD861903S1 (en) 2018-05-15 2019-10-01 Neurometrix, Inc. Apparatus for transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation
EP3796968B1 (fr) 2018-05-22 2022-07-13 Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation Traitement adaptatif par neurostimulation électrique pour réduire la perception de la douleur
EP4541416A2 (fr) 2018-05-22 2025-04-23 Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation Soulagement de la douleur chronique adaptatif par neurostimulation électrique implantée
WO2019226656A1 (fr) * 2018-05-23 2019-11-28 Sana Health, Inc. Procédé non pharmaceutique de gestion de la douleur
CN108830806B (zh) * 2018-05-29 2020-12-18 河南科技大学 一种感受野模型的敏感度及模型参数动态调控方法
WO2020115326A2 (fr) 2018-12-07 2020-06-11 GSK Consumer Healthcare S.A. Détermination intelligente d'intensité de stimulation thérapeutique pour une stimulation nerveuse électrique transcutanée
US11247043B2 (en) 2019-10-01 2022-02-15 Epineuron Technologies Inc. Electrode interface devices for delivery of neuroregenerative therapy
WO2024006905A1 (fr) 2022-07-01 2024-01-04 Nevro Corp. Neurostimulation pour le traitement de déficits sensoriels, et systèmes et méthodes associés

Citations (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20030181954A1 (en) 2001-12-24 2003-09-25 Rezai Ali R. Modulation of the brain to affect psychiatric disorders
US20050055065A1 (en) * 2003-07-18 2005-03-10 Campbell James N. Treatment of pain
US20060089350A1 (en) 1998-12-23 2006-04-27 Neurotherapeutics Pharma Llc Methods and compositions for the treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders
US20070016264A1 (en) 2002-06-27 2007-01-18 Falci Scott P Method for eradicating pain of central origin resulting from spinal cord injury
US20070244408A1 (en) 2002-09-13 2007-10-18 Neuropace, Inc. Spatiotemporal pattern recognition for neurological event detection and prediction in an implantable device
US20070255176A1 (en) 2006-04-28 2007-11-01 Medtronic, Inc. Voiding detection with learning mode
US20090143450A1 (en) 2005-05-06 2009-06-04 University Of Maryland, Baltimore Method for treating central pain syndrom or for inducing centrally generated pain in an animal model
US7603174B2 (en) 2004-10-21 2009-10-13 Advanced Neuromodulation Systems, Inc. Stimulation of the amygdalohippocampal complex to treat neurological conditions
US7894905B2 (en) * 2006-03-13 2011-02-22 Neuropace, Inc. Implantable system enabling responsive therapy for pain

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20030100931A1 (en) * 2001-11-28 2003-05-29 Keith Mullett Brain signal feedback for pain management
AU2003210752A1 (en) * 2002-02-01 2003-09-02 The Cleveland Clinic Foundation Modulation of the pain circuitry to affect chronic pain
WO2006033110A2 (fr) * 2004-09-24 2006-03-30 Dov Ehrlich Procede et dispositif de traitement des acouphenes et d'autres troubles neurologiques par stimulation cerebrale dans le colliculus inferieur et/ou des zones adjacentes

Patent Citations (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20060089350A1 (en) 1998-12-23 2006-04-27 Neurotherapeutics Pharma Llc Methods and compositions for the treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders
US20030181954A1 (en) 2001-12-24 2003-09-25 Rezai Ali R. Modulation of the brain to affect psychiatric disorders
US20070016264A1 (en) 2002-06-27 2007-01-18 Falci Scott P Method for eradicating pain of central origin resulting from spinal cord injury
US20070244408A1 (en) 2002-09-13 2007-10-18 Neuropace, Inc. Spatiotemporal pattern recognition for neurological event detection and prediction in an implantable device
US20050055065A1 (en) * 2003-07-18 2005-03-10 Campbell James N. Treatment of pain
US7603174B2 (en) 2004-10-21 2009-10-13 Advanced Neuromodulation Systems, Inc. Stimulation of the amygdalohippocampal complex to treat neurological conditions
US20090143450A1 (en) 2005-05-06 2009-06-04 University Of Maryland, Baltimore Method for treating central pain syndrom or for inducing centrally generated pain in an animal model
US7894905B2 (en) * 2006-03-13 2011-02-22 Neuropace, Inc. Implantable system enabling responsive therapy for pain
US20070255176A1 (en) 2006-04-28 2007-11-01 Medtronic, Inc. Voiding detection with learning mode

Non-Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Alterations in Burst Friring of Thalamic VPL Neurons and Reversal by NAv1.3 Antisense After Spinal Cord Injury; Bryan C. Hains, Carl Y. Saab, and Stephen G. Waxman; J Neurophysiology 95: 3343-3352, 2006. *
Changes in electrophysiological properties and sodium channel Nav1.3 expression in thalamic neurons after spinal cord injury; Bryan C. Hains, Carl. Y. Saab and Stephen G. Waxman, Brain (2005), 128, 2359-2371. *
Lee et al. "Pain and Temperature Encoding in the Human Thalamic Somatic Sensory Nucleus (Ventral Caudal): Inhibition-Related Bursting Evoked by Somatic Stimuli". Apr. 4, 2005 [Retrieved on Jul. 8, 2011] Retrieved from the Internet: URL:http//jn.physiology.org/content/94/3/1676.full.pdf+html>entire document.
Thalamic neuron hyperexcitability and enlarged receptive field in the STZ model of diabetic pain; Tanya Z. Fischer, Andrew M. Tan, Stephen G. Waxman; Brain Research 1268 (May 1, 2009) 154-161. *

Cited By (21)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9402558B2 (en) 2007-04-05 2016-08-02 New York University System and method for pain detection and computation of a pain quantification index
US12011597B2 (en) 2011-05-19 2024-06-18 Neuros Medical, Inc. Nerve cuff electrode for neuromodulation in large human nerve trunks
US11723579B2 (en) 2017-09-19 2023-08-15 Neuroenhancement Lab, LLC Method and apparatus for neuroenhancement
US11717686B2 (en) 2017-12-04 2023-08-08 Neuroenhancement Lab, LLC Method and apparatus for neuroenhancement to facilitate learning and performance
US11752331B2 (en) 2017-12-13 2023-09-12 Neuros Medical, Inc. Nerve cuff deployment devices
US12083340B2 (en) 2017-12-20 2024-09-10 Galvani Bioelectronics Limited Treatment of acute medical conditions
US12296171B2 (en) 2017-12-20 2025-05-13 Galvani Bioelectronics Limited Stimulation of a nerve supplying the spleen
US12161869B2 (en) 2017-12-20 2024-12-10 Galvani Bioelectronics Limited Treatment of disorders associated with inflammation
US12121718B2 (en) 2017-12-20 2024-10-22 Galvani Bioelectronics Limited Treatment of acute medical conditions
EP3727570A1 (fr) * 2017-12-20 2020-10-28 Galvani Bioelectronics Limited Traitement des troubles associés à l'inflammation
US11273283B2 (en) 2017-12-31 2022-03-15 Neuroenhancement Lab, LLC Method and apparatus for neuroenhancement to enhance emotional response
US12280219B2 (en) 2017-12-31 2025-04-22 NeuroLight, Inc. Method and apparatus for neuroenhancement to enhance emotional response
US11478603B2 (en) 2017-12-31 2022-10-25 Neuroenhancement Lab, LLC Method and apparatus for neuroenhancement to enhance emotional response
US11318277B2 (en) 2017-12-31 2022-05-03 Neuroenhancement Lab, LLC Method and apparatus for neuroenhancement to enhance emotional response
US11730963B2 (en) 2018-04-09 2023-08-22 Neuros Medical, Inc. Apparatuses and methods for setting an electrical dose
US12201837B2 (en) 2018-04-09 2025-01-21 Neuros Medical, Inc. Apparatuses and methods for setting an electrical dose
US11364361B2 (en) 2018-04-20 2022-06-21 Neuroenhancement Lab, LLC System and method for inducing sleep by transplanting mental states
US11452839B2 (en) 2018-09-14 2022-09-27 Neuroenhancement Lab, LLC System and method of improving sleep
US11786694B2 (en) 2019-05-24 2023-10-17 NeuroLight, Inc. Device, method, and app for facilitating sleep
US11878172B2 (en) 2020-02-11 2024-01-23 Neuros Medical, Inc. System and method for quantifying qualitative patient-reported data sets
WO2024081829A1 (fr) * 2022-10-13 2024-04-18 Case Western Reserve University Gestion de la douleur par stimulation de la moelle épinière ventrale

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2013525029A (ja) 2013-06-20
US20130066394A1 (en) 2013-03-14
EP2563462A1 (fr) 2013-03-06
EP2563462A4 (fr) 2014-02-12
CA2797701A1 (fr) 2011-11-03
US9486632B2 (en) 2016-11-08
CA2797701C (fr) 2022-06-21
WO2011137193A1 (fr) 2011-11-03
EP2563462B1 (fr) 2022-12-28
US20150231395A1 (en) 2015-08-20
AU2011245359B2 (en) 2015-07-09

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US9486632B2 (en) Pain management
AU2011245359A1 (en) Pain management
EP3573517B1 (fr) Accès à un réseau vertébral pour permettre la fonction respiratoire
US10835170B2 (en) Methods for detecting neuronal oscillation in the spinal cord associated with pain and diseases or disorders of the nervous system
Iwata et al. High-frequency stimulation in the ventral posterolateral thalamus reverses electrophysiologic changes and hyperalgesia in a rat model of peripheral neuropathic pain
US8374696B2 (en) Closed-loop micro-control system for predicting and preventing epileptic seizures
US8918176B2 (en) Assessing cognitive disorders based on non-motor epileptiform bioelectrical brain activity
US10076666B2 (en) Systems and methods for treating post-traumatic stress disorder
US9399133B2 (en) Non-invasive automated electrical control systems and methods for monitoring animal conditions
Ward et al. An emerging method to noninvasively measure and identify vagal response markers to enable bioelectronic control of gastroparesis symptoms with gastric electrical stimulation
Simon et al. Electroencephalography, electrocorticography, and cortical stimulation techniques
Habaguchi et al. Medullary reticulospinal tract mediating the generalized motor inhibition in cats: II. Functional organization within the medullary reticular formation with respect to postsynaptic inhibition of forelimb and hindlimb motoneurons
Iyer et al. Multi-limb acquisition of motor evoked potentials and its application in spinal cord injury
Lo et al. Motor and somatosensory abnormalities are significant etiological factors for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
KR20250019024A (ko) 신경 자극용 치료제를 전달하기 위한 시스템, 디바이스, 및 방법
Galati et al. Cortical slow wave activity correlates with striatal synaptic strength in normal but not in Parkinsonian rats
Sabetian Directionally Sensitive Low-Noise Neural Recording Using Tetrapolar Nerve Cuff Electrode
Pikov et al. Spinal hyperexcitability and bladder hyperreflexia during reversible frontal cortical inactivation induced by low-frequency electrical stimulation in the cat
Madden et al. Physiological activity within peripheral nerves influences neural output in response to electrical stimulation: an in vivo study
Zhang et al. Suppression of Visceral Nociception by Selective C-Fiber Transmission Block Using Temporal Interference Sinusoidal Stimulation
de Carrizosa et al. A chronically implantable device for the controlled delivery of substances, and stimulation and recording of activity in severed nerves
Cao Mapping and Modulating the Stomach-Brain Neuroaxis
Ludwig et al. Application of kilohertz-frequency block to mitigate off-target motor effects of vagus nerve stimulation in swine
Wu Probing and modulating brain circuits by deep brain stimulation
MILLS et al. Sensorimotor Control 29 R. Dengler and AR Kossev (Eds.) IOS Press, 2001

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

AS Assignment

Owner name: RHODE ISLAND HOSPITAL, RHODE ISLAND

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:SAAB, CARL Y;REEL/FRAME:037166/0699

Effective date: 20110510

Owner name: RHODE ISLAND HOSPITAL, RHODE ISLAND

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:SAAB, CARL Y;REEL/FRAME:037167/0238

Effective date: 20110510

MAFP Maintenance fee payment

Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 4TH YR, SMALL ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M2551); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: SMALL ENTITY

Year of fee payment: 4

MAFP Maintenance fee payment

Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 8TH YR, SMALL ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M2552); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: SMALL ENTITY

Year of fee payment: 8

点击 这是indexloc提供的php浏览器服务，不要输入任何密码和下载