+

US8117000B2 - Measuring quantum states of superconducting resonators - Google Patents

Measuring quantum states of superconducting resonators Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US8117000B2
US8117000B2 US12/507,977 US50797709A US8117000B2 US 8117000 B2 US8117000 B2 US 8117000B2 US 50797709 A US50797709 A US 50797709A US 8117000 B2 US8117000 B2 US 8117000B2
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
resonator
signal
quantum state
nonlinear
phase shift
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active, expires
Application number
US12/507,977
Other versions
US20110022340A1 (en
Inventor
David DiVincenzo
George A. Keefe
Shwetank Kumar
Matthias Steffen
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
International Business Machines Corp
Original Assignee
International Business Machines Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by International Business Machines Corp filed Critical International Business Machines Corp
Priority to US12/507,977 priority Critical patent/US8117000B2/en
Assigned to INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION reassignment INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: DIVINCENZO, DAVID, KEEFE, GEORGE A., KUMAR, SHWETANK, STEFFEN, MATTHIAS
Publication of US20110022340A1 publication Critical patent/US20110022340A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US8117000B2 publication Critical patent/US8117000B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Adjusted expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06NCOMPUTING ARRANGEMENTS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
    • G06N10/00Quantum computing, i.e. information processing based on quantum-mechanical phenomena
    • G06N10/40Physical realisations or architectures of quantum processors or components for manipulating qubits, e.g. qubit coupling or qubit control
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B82NANOTECHNOLOGY
    • B82YSPECIFIC USES OR APPLICATIONS OF NANOSTRUCTURES; MEASUREMENT OR ANALYSIS OF NANOSTRUCTURES; MANUFACTURE OR TREATMENT OF NANOSTRUCTURES
    • B82Y10/00Nanotechnology for information processing, storage or transmission, e.g. quantum computing or single electron logic

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to quantum computing, and more specifically, to a system and method for measuring the quantum state of superconducting resonators.
  • Superconducting resonators are often used in circuits for quantum computers.
  • Methods for measuring the state of a superconducting resonator include coupling the resonator to a qubit and implementing a dispersive readout, and transferring the resonator state to the qubit and reading the state with a DC Superconducting Quantum Interference Device (SQUID).
  • SQUID Superconducting Quantum Interference Device
  • Previous methods of measuring the quantum state of a resonator may undesirably change the quantum state; and transferring the resonator state to the qubit and the DC SQUID is a cumbersome and relatively time consuming process.
  • a method for measuring the quantum state of a resonator includes, exciting an input port of a circuit with signal, measuring a phase shift of the signal at an output port of the circuit, wherein the resonator is coupled to the input and the output ports, and calculating a quantum state of the resonator as a function of the measured phase shift of the signal.
  • a system for measuring the quantum state of a resonator includes a nonlinear resonator coupled to an input and an output port, a signal generating device connected to an input port of the circuit to excite the resonator with a signal, a signal measuring device connected to an output port of the circuit, and a processor operative to measure a phase shift of the signal and calculate the quantum state of the resonator as a function of the phase shift.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates an exemplary embodiment of a system for measuring the quantum state of a superconducting resonator.
  • FIG. 2 illustrates example simulation results of a system similar to the system of FIG. 1 .
  • FIG. 3 illustrates an alternate exemplary embodiment of a system for measuring the quantum state of a superconducting resonator.
  • FIG. 4 illustrates an example of a simulated response of the system of FIG. 3 .
  • FIG. 1 illustrates an exemplary embodiment of a circuit having a quantum state that may be read using the methods described below.
  • the method described allows the determination of the quantum state of the first mode of the resonator by measuring the shift in frequency response of the resonator at a second mode.
  • the method allows the quantum state of a resonator to be determined without undesirably changing the quantum state of the resonator.
  • FIG. 1 includes a system 100 having a resonator 102 that may include, for example, a transmission line resonator, a distributed half-wave resonator, lumped element resonator coupled to a feed line 104 , and terminated to ground through a nonlinear element 106 .
  • the nonlinear element is a reactive element having capacitive or inductive properties. Examples of a nonlinear element include a nonlinear inductor, RF SQUID, JJ SQUID, DC SQUID, quantum dots, or a qubit.
  • the feed line is connected to an input port 108 and an output port 110 .
  • the input port 108 is connected to a microwave emitting device 112 , such as, for example, a microwave frequency synthesizer or a network analyzer that is capable of emitting a range of microwave frequencies that excite the system 100 .
  • the output port 110 is connected to a microwave measuring device 114 that may include, for example, a network analyzer or a homodyne detection circuit that operates to measure the response of the system 100 .
  • the system 100 may include a processor 113 and a display 115 .
  • the processor 113 may be connected internally or externally to the microwave emitting device 112 and/or the microwave measuring device 114 .
  • the resonator 102 is designed to have at least two modes with a typical frequency of the fundamental mode f r ⁇ 6 GHz.
  • the next relevant mode of the device is approximately three times the fundamental mode of f 3r ⁇ 18 GHz.
  • the resonator response is measured as a function of the readout frequency f by exciting the input port 108 of the feed line 104 with a microwave signal from the microwave emitting device 112 and detecting the signal at the output port 110 with the microwave measuring device 114 .
  • the forward scattering parameter (S 21 ) may be measured and used to determine the quantum state of the resonator 102 .
  • 1.
  • the resonator 102 loads the through line resulting in a transmission null and
  • the microwave signal at f ⁇ f r or f 3r travels past the resonator 102 , the microwave signal incurs a phase shift.
  • the resonance frequency of the resonator 102 is dependent on the energy stored in the resonator 102 due to the nonlinear element 106 that connects the resonator to ground.
  • the resonance frequencies of the resonator 102 shift.
  • the shift causes the phase shift of the measurement microwave signal (f ⁇ f 3r ) as the microwave signal travels past the resonator 102 to change.
  • the method described above is not limited to the example frequencies and modes.
  • the roles of the f r and f 3r modes are interchangeable, thus the phase shift at the f r mode could be used to measure the energy in the f 3r mode (or another mode).
  • the degree of incommensurability of the two mode frequencies can be increased by increasing the average terminating inductance relative to the characteristic frequency of the transmission line.
  • the pair of modes does not necessarily include the fundamental mode, for example the pair of modes may include the second and third mode of a quarter-wave resonator with example frequencies 2 GHz, 6 GHz, and 10 GHz.
  • the frequencies may be scaled up or down for cooling or amplifier bandwidth considerations.
  • the degree of nonlinearity from the nonlinear element 106 may be enhanced by placing the plasma frequency of the nonlinear element 106 close to a multiple of the measured mode. Alternate measurement schemes may be used for example, measuring a reverse scattering parameter S 11 . Multiple resonators with different resonance frequencies each attached to a different nonlinear element may be coupled to the same feedline in a frequency division multiplexed arrangement to measure many resonators simultaneously.
  • FIG. 2 illustrates a simulated response of a device similar to the circuit 100 .
  • the power used to excite the resonator at the fundamental frequency is shown on the x-axis ( 201 ).
  • the power used to excite the resonator at the fundamental frequency is related to the energy residing in the fundamental mode of the resonator 102 through a scaling Q r /2 ⁇ f r wherein Q r is the resonator quality factor.
  • the function of the relationship between the measured phase shift and the quantum state of the resonator may be determined by experimentation and applied to a given circuit design.
  • the y-axis ( 203 ) shows the change in the phase shift of the microwave signal at the readout frequency (close to f 3r ). Measured using the microwave measuring device 114 .
  • FIG. 3 illustrates a system 300 that is an alternate exemplary embodiment of the circuit described above.
  • the resonator 302 includes two transmission lines 301 and 303 .
  • the transmission lines 301 and 303 are connected to nonlinear elements 304 .
  • the system 300 includes a pump synthesizer 306 , a probe synthesizer 308 , a 180-degree hybrid 310 , and a power splitter 312 .
  • the quantum state of one mode of the resonator 302 can be determined by measuring the phase shift of the signal exciting another mode.
  • FIG. 4 illustrates an example of a simulated response of the system 300 (of FIG. 3 ).
  • 3/2, where ⁇ is determined by the relative lengths of the transmission lines 301 and 303 .
  • the inset graph 401 illustrates the phase response of as pump synthesizer 306 power is swept from 0 to 0.3 fW in steps of 0.03 fW. The nearly linear shift of the phase profile with the pump synthesizer 306 power demonstrates the cross-Kerr effect.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Nanotechnology (AREA)
  • Mathematical Physics (AREA)
  • Crystallography & Structural Chemistry (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
  • Condensed Matter Physics & Semiconductors (AREA)
  • Computational Mathematics (AREA)
  • Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
  • Artificial Intelligence (AREA)
  • Mathematical Analysis (AREA)
  • Mathematical Optimization (AREA)
  • Pure & Applied Mathematics (AREA)
  • Computing Systems (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Software Systems (AREA)
  • Superconductor Devices And Manufacturing Methods Thereof (AREA)

Abstract

A method for measuring the quantum state of a resonator includes, exciting an input port of a circuit with signal, measuring a phase shift of the signal at an output port of the circuit, wherein the resonator is coupled to the input and the output ports, and calculating a quantum state of the resonator as a function of the measured phase shift of the signal.

Description

FIELD OF INVENTION
The present invention relates to quantum computing, and more specifically, to a system and method for measuring the quantum state of superconducting resonators.
DESCRIPTION OF RELATED ART
Superconducting resonators are often used in circuits for quantum computers. Methods for measuring the state of a superconducting resonator include coupling the resonator to a qubit and implementing a dispersive readout, and transferring the resonator state to the qubit and reading the state with a DC Superconducting Quantum Interference Device (SQUID). Previous methods of measuring the quantum state of a resonator may undesirably change the quantum state; and transferring the resonator state to the qubit and the DC SQUID is a cumbersome and relatively time consuming process.
BRIEF SUMMARY
According to one aspect of the present invention, a method for measuring the quantum state of a resonator includes, exciting an input port of a circuit with signal, measuring a phase shift of the signal at an output port of the circuit, wherein the resonator is coupled to the input and the output ports, and calculating a quantum state of the resonator as a function of the measured phase shift of the signal.
According to another aspect of the present invention, a system for measuring the quantum state of a resonator includes a nonlinear resonator coupled to an input and an output port, a signal generating device connected to an input port of the circuit to excite the resonator with a signal, a signal measuring device connected to an output port of the circuit, and a processor operative to measure a phase shift of the signal and calculate the quantum state of the resonator as a function of the phase shift.
Additional features and advantages are realized through the techniques of the present invention. Other embodiments and aspects of the invention are described in detail herein and are considered a part of the claimed invention. For a better understanding of the invention with the advantages and the features, refer to the description and to the drawings.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS
The subject matter which is regarded as the invention is particularly pointed out and distinctly claimed in the claims at the conclusion of the specification. The forgoing and other features, and advantages of the invention are apparent from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:
FIG. 1 illustrates an exemplary embodiment of a system for measuring the quantum state of a superconducting resonator.
FIG. 2 illustrates example simulation results of a system similar to the system of FIG. 1.
FIG. 3 illustrates an alternate exemplary embodiment of a system for measuring the quantum state of a superconducting resonator.
FIG. 4 illustrates an example of a simulated response of the system of FIG. 3.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
A method and system for measuring the quantum state of a superconducting resonator by performing microwave readout is described below. FIG. 1 illustrates an exemplary embodiment of a circuit having a quantum state that may be read using the methods described below. The method described allows the determination of the quantum state of the first mode of the resonator by measuring the shift in frequency response of the resonator at a second mode. The method allows the quantum state of a resonator to be determined without undesirably changing the quantum state of the resonator.
In this regard, FIG. 1 includes a system 100 having a resonator 102 that may include, for example, a transmission line resonator, a distributed half-wave resonator, lumped element resonator coupled to a feed line 104, and terminated to ground through a nonlinear element 106. The nonlinear element is a reactive element having capacitive or inductive properties. Examples of a nonlinear element include a nonlinear inductor, RF SQUID, JJ SQUID, DC SQUID, quantum dots, or a qubit. The feed line is connected to an input port 108 and an output port 110. The input port 108 is connected to a microwave emitting device 112, such as, for example, a microwave frequency synthesizer or a network analyzer that is capable of emitting a range of microwave frequencies that excite the system 100. The output port 110 is connected to a microwave measuring device 114 that may include, for example, a network analyzer or a homodyne detection circuit that operates to measure the response of the system 100. The system 100 may include a processor 113 and a display 115. The processor 113 may be connected internally or externally to the microwave emitting device 112 and/or the microwave measuring device 114.
In the illustrated example, the resonator 102 is designed to have at least two modes with a typical frequency of the fundamental mode fr˜6 GHz. The next relevant mode of the device is approximately three times the fundamental mode of f3r˜18 GHz. In operation, the resonator response is measured as a function of the readout frequency f by exciting the input port 108 of the feed line 104 with a microwave signal from the microwave emitting device 112 and detecting the signal at the output port 110 with the microwave measuring device 114.
The forward scattering parameter (S21) may be measured and used to determine the quantum state of the resonator 102. For excitation frequencies far from the resonance frequencies of the resonator 102|S2|=1. At f≈fr, f3r the resonator 102 loads the through line resulting in a transmission null and |S21| approaches 0 for a high quality factor resonator. As the microwave signal at f≈fr or f3r travels past the resonator 102, the microwave signal incurs a phase shift. The resonance frequency of the resonator 102 is dependent on the energy stored in the resonator 102 due to the nonlinear element 106 that connects the resonator to ground. As the energy in the fundamental mode (or equivalently the quantum state of the resonator 102) changes, the resonance frequencies of the resonator 102 shift. The shift causes the phase shift of the measurement microwave signal (f≈f3r) as the microwave signal travels past the resonator 102 to change.
The method described above is not limited to the example frequencies and modes. For example, the roles of the fr and f3r modes are interchangeable, thus the phase shift at the fr mode could be used to measure the energy in the f3r mode (or another mode). The degree of incommensurability of the two mode frequencies can be increased by increasing the average terminating inductance relative to the characteristic frequency of the transmission line. The pair of modes does not necessarily include the fundamental mode, for example the pair of modes may include the second and third mode of a quarter-wave resonator with example frequencies 2 GHz, 6 GHz, and 10 GHz. The frequencies may be scaled up or down for cooling or amplifier bandwidth considerations. The degree of nonlinearity from the nonlinear element 106 may be enhanced by placing the plasma frequency of the nonlinear element 106 close to a multiple of the measured mode. Alternate measurement schemes may be used for example, measuring a reverse scattering parameter S11. Multiple resonators with different resonance frequencies each attached to a different nonlinear element may be coupled to the same feedline in a frequency division multiplexed arrangement to measure many resonators simultaneously.
FIG. 2 illustrates a simulated response of a device similar to the circuit 100. The power used to excite the resonator at the fundamental frequency is shown on the x-axis (201). The power used to excite the resonator at the fundamental frequency is related to the energy residing in the fundamental mode of the resonator 102 through a scaling Qr/2πfr wherein Qr is the resonator quality factor. The energy resident in the fundamental mode of the resonator 102 corresponds to the quantum state of the resonator 102 and is equal to En=nhfr, where n is the quantum number of the state and h is the Plank's constant. The function of the relationship between the measured phase shift and the quantum state of the resonator may be determined by experimentation and applied to a given circuit design. The y-axis (203) shows the change in the phase shift of the microwave signal at the readout frequency (close to f3r). Measured using the microwave measuring device 114.
FIG. 3 illustrates a system 300 that is an alternate exemplary embodiment of the circuit described above. The resonator 302 includes two transmission lines 301 and 303. The transmission lines 301 and 303 are connected to nonlinear elements 304. The system 300 includes a pump synthesizer 306, a probe synthesizer 308, a 180-degree hybrid 310, and a power splitter 312. In operation, the 180-degree hybrid 310 causes the pump synthesizer 306 to couple to ring modes with an odd voltage profile with respect to the x=0 line 313; while the power splitter 312 causes the probe synthesizer 308 to couple to even modes. The quantum state of one mode of the resonator 302 can be determined by measuring the phase shift of the signal exciting another mode.
FIG. 4 illustrates an example of a simulated response of the system 300 (of FIG. 3). In the illustrated example, α=3/2, where α is determined by the relative lengths of the transmission lines 301 and 303. The inset graph 401 illustrates the phase response of as pump synthesizer 306 power is swept from 0 to 0.3 fW in steps of 0.03 fW. The nearly linear shift of the phase profile with the pump synthesizer 306 power demonstrates the cross-Kerr effect.
The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the invention. As used herein, the singular forms “a”, “an” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. It will be further understood that the terms “comprises” and/or “comprising,” when used in this specification, specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, element components, and/or groups thereof.
The corresponding structures, materials, acts, and equivalents of all means or step plus function elements in the claims below are intended to include any structure, material, or act for performing the function in combination with other claimed elements as specifically claimed. The description of the present invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and description, but is not intended to be exhaustive or limited to the invention in the form disclosed. Many modifications and variations will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. The embodiment was chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and the practical application, and to enable others of ordinary skill in the art to understand the invention for various embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated
The diagrams depicted herein are just one example. There may be many variations to this diagram or the steps (or operations) described therein without departing from the spirit of the invention. For instance, the steps may be performed in a differing order or steps may be added, deleted or modified. All of these variations are considered a part of the claimed invention.
While the preferred embodiment to the invention had been described, it will be understood that those skilled in the art, both now and in the future, may make various improvements and enhancements which fall within the scope of the claims which follow. These claims should be construed to maintain the proper protection for the invention first described.

Claims (19)

What is claimed is:
1. A method for measuring the quantum state of a resonator comprising:
exciting an input port of a circuit with signal;
measuring a phase shift of the signal at an output port of the circuit, wherein the resonator is coupled to the input and the output ports; and
calculating a quantum state of the resonator as a function of the measured phase shift of the signal.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the resonator has at least a first resonance mode and a second resonance mode.
3. The method of claim 2, wherein the measured phase shift is induced in the excitation signal for second mode resonance is indicative of the quantum state of the first mode resonance.
4. The method of claim 2, wherein the calculated quantum state of the resonator corresponds to the quantum state of the resonator at the first resonance mode.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein the resonator is capacitively coupled to the output ports.
6. The method of claim 1, wherein the resonator is a transmission line resonator.
7. The method of claim 1, wherein the resonator is a lumped element resonator.
8. The method of claim 1, wherein the resonator is a ring resonator.
9. The method of claim 1, wherein the nonlinear element is reactive.
10. A system for measuring the quantum state of a resonator comprising:
a nonlinear resonator coupled to an input and an output port;
a signal generating device connected to an input port of the circuit to excite the resonator with a signal;
a signal measuring device connected to an output port of the circuit; and
a processor operative to measure a phase shift of the signal and calculate the quantum state of the resonator as a function of the phase shift.
11. The system of claim 10, wherein the nonlinear resonator is capacitively coupled to the input port and the output port via a feedline.
12. The system of claim 10, wherein the nonlinear resonator is a transmission line resonator.
13. The system of claim 10, wherein the nonlinear resonator is a quarter-wave resonator.
14. The system of claim 10, wherein the signal is a microwave signal.
15. The system of claim 10, wherein the nonlinear resonator is connected to ground via a nonlinear inductor.
16. The system of claim 15, wherein the nonlinear inductor is operative to couple at least two modes of the resonator.
17. The system of claim 10, wherein the resonator has at least a first resonance mode frequency and a second resonance mode frequency.
18. The system of claim 17, wherein the measured phase shift is induced when a frequency of the signal approaches the second resonance mode frequency.
19. The system of claim 17, wherein the calculated quantum state of the resonator corresponds to the quantum state of the resonator at the first resonance mode frequency.
US12/507,977 2009-07-23 2009-07-23 Measuring quantum states of superconducting resonators Active 2030-08-06 US8117000B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12/507,977 US8117000B2 (en) 2009-07-23 2009-07-23 Measuring quantum states of superconducting resonators

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12/507,977 US8117000B2 (en) 2009-07-23 2009-07-23 Measuring quantum states of superconducting resonators

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20110022340A1 US20110022340A1 (en) 2011-01-27
US8117000B2 true US8117000B2 (en) 2012-02-14

Family

ID=43498047

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/507,977 Active 2030-08-06 US8117000B2 (en) 2009-07-23 2009-07-23 Measuring quantum states of superconducting resonators

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US8117000B2 (en)

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9454061B1 (en) * 2015-12-17 2016-09-27 International Business Machines Corporation Quantum coherent microwave to optical conversion scheme employing a mechanical element and a squid
US10043136B1 (en) 2017-10-12 2018-08-07 International Business Machines Corporation Reducing the number of input lines to superconducting quantum processors installed inside dilution refrigerators
US10567100B2 (en) 2016-09-26 2020-02-18 International Business Machines Corporation Microwave combiner and distributer for quantum signals using frequency-division multiplexing
WO2021061776A1 (en) * 2019-09-24 2021-04-01 Google Llc Multiplexed readout system
US12317757B2 (en) 2018-10-11 2025-05-27 SeeQC, Inc. System and method for superconducting multi-chip module

Families Citing this family (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8841764B2 (en) 2012-01-31 2014-09-23 International Business Machines Corporation Superconducting quantum circuit having a resonant cavity thermalized with metal components
US9159033B2 (en) * 2013-03-14 2015-10-13 Internatinal Business Machines Corporation Frequency separation between qubit and chip mode to reduce purcell loss
US8972921B2 (en) 2013-03-14 2015-03-03 International Business Machines Corporation Symmetric placement of components on a chip to reduce crosstalk induced by chip modes
US8865537B2 (en) 2013-03-14 2014-10-21 International Business Machines Corporation Differential excitation of ports to control chip-mode mediated crosstalk
JP6379850B2 (en) * 2013-10-11 2018-08-29 セイコーエプソン株式会社 Powder for laser sintering and method for producing structure
EP3130031B1 (en) 2015-07-06 2019-12-04 Rigetti & Co., Inc. Lumped-element device for quantum information processing systems
US9922289B2 (en) * 2015-09-30 2018-03-20 International Business Machines Corporation Quantum nondemolition microwave photon counter based on the cross-Kerr nonlinearity of a Josephson junction embedded in a superconducting circuit

Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20030224944A1 (en) * 2001-12-18 2003-12-04 Evgeni Il'ichev Characterization and measurement of superconducting structures
WO2004086295A1 (en) 2003-03-26 2004-10-07 Qucor Pty Ltd A control architecture for a quantum computer
US7135697B2 (en) 2004-02-25 2006-11-14 Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation Spin readout and initialization in semiconductor quantum dots
US7219018B2 (en) 2003-09-11 2007-05-15 Franco Vitaliano Quantum information processing elements and quantum information processing platforms using such elements
US20070295954A1 (en) 2004-02-23 2007-12-27 International Business Machines Corporation Method and structure to isolate a qubit from the environment
US20080310000A1 (en) * 2004-07-26 2008-12-18 Beausoleil Jr Raymond G Quantum Coherent Systems and Operations
US20090091812A1 (en) * 2007-09-26 2009-04-09 Hayato Goto Quantum computer and quantum computation method
US20090289638A1 (en) * 2008-05-23 2009-11-26 International Business Machines Corporation Microwave readout for flux-biased qubits

Patent Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20030224944A1 (en) * 2001-12-18 2003-12-04 Evgeni Il'ichev Characterization and measurement of superconducting structures
WO2004086295A1 (en) 2003-03-26 2004-10-07 Qucor Pty Ltd A control architecture for a quantum computer
US7219018B2 (en) 2003-09-11 2007-05-15 Franco Vitaliano Quantum information processing elements and quantum information processing platforms using such elements
US20070295954A1 (en) 2004-02-23 2007-12-27 International Business Machines Corporation Method and structure to isolate a qubit from the environment
US7135697B2 (en) 2004-02-25 2006-11-14 Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation Spin readout and initialization in semiconductor quantum dots
US20080310000A1 (en) * 2004-07-26 2008-12-18 Beausoleil Jr Raymond G Quantum Coherent Systems and Operations
US20090091812A1 (en) * 2007-09-26 2009-04-09 Hayato Goto Quantum computer and quantum computation method
US20090289638A1 (en) * 2008-05-23 2009-11-26 International Business Machines Corporation Microwave readout for flux-biased qubits

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Janice C. Lee et al., "Resonant Readout of a Persistent Current Qubit," IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, vol. 15, No. 2, Jun. 2005.

Cited By (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9454061B1 (en) * 2015-12-17 2016-09-27 International Business Machines Corporation Quantum coherent microwave to optical conversion scheme employing a mechanical element and a squid
US10567100B2 (en) 2016-09-26 2020-02-18 International Business Machines Corporation Microwave combiner and distributer for quantum signals using frequency-division multiplexing
US11139903B2 (en) 2016-09-26 2021-10-05 International Business Machines Corporation Microwave combiner and distributer for quantum signals using frequency-division multiplexing
US10043136B1 (en) 2017-10-12 2018-08-07 International Business Machines Corporation Reducing the number of input lines to superconducting quantum processors installed inside dilution refrigerators
US12317757B2 (en) 2018-10-11 2025-05-27 SeeQC, Inc. System and method for superconducting multi-chip module
WO2021061776A1 (en) * 2019-09-24 2021-04-01 Google Llc Multiplexed readout system
EP4035093A1 (en) * 2019-09-24 2022-08-03 Google LLC Multiplexed readout system
AU2020354489B2 (en) * 2019-09-24 2023-10-05 Google Llc Multiplexed readout system
US11799432B2 (en) 2019-09-24 2023-10-24 Google Llc Multiplexed readout system

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20110022340A1 (en) 2011-01-27

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8117000B2 (en) Measuring quantum states of superconducting resonators
JP6802266B2 (en) Quantum non-destructive microwave photon counter based on cross-car non-linearity of Josephson junction embedded in superconducting circuit, counting method, and operating method
JP6941166B2 (en) Microwave detection devices, methods for forming microwave detection devices, methods for detecting microwave photons, and methods for detecting the absence of microwave photons.
Asi et al. Dispersion analysis of anisotropic inhomogeneous waveguides using compact 2D-FDTD
Schuster et al. ac Stark shift and dephasing of a superconducting qubit strongly coupled to a cavity field
US8188752B2 (en) Yield improvement for Josephson junction test device formation
CN109030955A (en) A kind of portable fluid dielectric constant measurement system based on SIW
Stammeier et al. Applying electric and magnetic field bias in a 3D superconducting waveguide cavity with high quality factor
CN109891252A (en) Quantum power sensor
Holzbauer et al. Systematic uncertainties in RF-based measurement of superconducting cavity quality factors
Machida et al. Direct numerical experiments for electromagnetic wave emissions with collective Josephson vortex dynamics
Kaufman et al. Simple, High Saturation Power, Quantum-limited, RF SQUID Array-based Josephson Parametric Amplifiers
Tobar et al. A generalized equivalent circuit applied to a tunable sapphire-loaded superconducting cavity
US12313663B2 (en) Method and apparatus for determining gate capacitance
Wang et al. New Differential Magnetic-Field Probe With Parasitic Elements for Near-Field Scanning
TWI391677B (en) Coupled-line structure hf capacitance tester and its test method
Hu et al. Engineering the Environment of a Superconducting Qubit with an Artificial Giant Atom
Paramonov et al. Radiation power and linewidth of a semifluxon-based Josephson oscillator
Bhunjun et al. Sensor system for contactless and online moisture measurements
US20240012041A1 (en) Charge sensor
Huang et al. A six-port coupler with high directivity for VSWR measurement
Wang et al. A New Differential Composite Probe With Outstanding Advantages of High Sensitivity, Multiple Components, and Low Profile
Yang et al. A calibration method of a radio frequency magnetic probe
US20250102551A1 (en) Complex dielectric constant sensing system and method
CN117647719A (en) Quantum parametric amplifier testing method, device, system and signal amplifying method

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, NEW Y

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:DIVINCENZO, DAVID;KEEFE, GEORGE A.;KUMAR, SHWETANK;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20090717 TO 20090722;REEL/FRAME:022997/0625

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4

MAFP Maintenance fee payment

Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 8TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1552); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

Year of fee payment: 8

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: MAINTENANCE FEE REMINDER MAILED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: REM.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: 11.5 YR SURCHARGE- LATE PMT W/IN 6 MO, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1556); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

MAFP Maintenance fee payment

Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 12TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1553); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

Year of fee payment: 12

点击 这是indexloc提供的php浏览器服务,不要输入任何密码和下载