+

US8001929B2 - System for managing a group of dairy animals - Google Patents

System for managing a group of dairy animals Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US8001929B2
US8001929B2 US12/443,499 US44349907A US8001929B2 US 8001929 B2 US8001929 B2 US 8001929B2 US 44349907 A US44349907 A US 44349907A US 8001929 B2 US8001929 B2 US 8001929B2
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
subgroup
dairy animals
milking
separated
computer
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active, expires
Application number
US12/443,499
Other versions
US20100012038A1 (en
Inventor
Gerth Petersen
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Maasland NV
Original Assignee
Maasland NV
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=38050095&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=US8001929(B2) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Maasland NV filed Critical Maasland NV
Assigned to MAASLAND N.V. reassignment MAASLAND N.V. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: PETERSEN, GERTH, MR.
Publication of US20100012038A1 publication Critical patent/US20100012038A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US8001929B2 publication Critical patent/US8001929B2/en
Assigned to MAASLAND N.V. reassignment MAASLAND N.V. CHANGE OF ADDRESS FOR ASSIGNEE Assignors: MAASLAND N.V.
Active legal-status Critical Current
Adjusted expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A01AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
    • A01KANIMAL HUSBANDRY; AVICULTURE; APICULTURE; PISCICULTURE; FISHING; REARING OR BREEDING ANIMALS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; NEW BREEDS OF ANIMALS
    • A01K29/00Other apparatus for animal husbandry
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A01AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
    • A01KANIMAL HUSBANDRY; AVICULTURE; APICULTURE; PISCICULTURE; FISHING; REARING OR BREEDING ANIMALS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; NEW BREEDS OF ANIMALS
    • A01K1/00Housing animals; Equipment therefor
    • A01K1/12Milking stations

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a system and method of managing a group of dairy animals to be milked fully automatically.
  • Dairy animals go through a lactation cycle that comprises a number of phases.
  • Calving is at the beginning of the lactation cycle. By calving and the pregnancy preceding the calving the milk production in an udder of the dairy animal is started. Calving is followed by inmilking, or starting up the milk production, in the beginning of which phase colostrum is produced. This is a transition to a phase of producing milk. During the latter phase, a dairy animal will be inseminated again, provided it is still in a proper condition for this purpose. At the end of the phase of producing milk, the milking is reduced and the dairy animal will be dry during some time in preparation of the next calving.
  • dairy animals are milked fully automatically by means of a milking robot during the phase of producing milk. Prior to calving, a dairy animal is separated from the group.
  • the current method of managing a group of dairy animals has the drawback that the dairy animals that are dried up disturb the production process around the milking robots.
  • the present invention aims at providing a solution for the above-mentioned problem, or at providing at least an alternative.
  • the system includes a computer executing program instructions for recording information and processing data indicating a division of the group of dairy animals into subgroups of a plurality of dairy animals, an insemination period determined per subgroup within which the dairy animals of the subgroup concerned are to be inseminated, which insemination period is so short that substantially all dairy animals in the subgroup concerned go simultaneously through the lactation cycle, and a separation of pregnant dairy animals of at least one of the subgroups in a separate area, around the beginning of the being dry phase of the subgroup concerned.
  • the system also includes at least one milking robot for automatically milking the dairy animals, operatively connected to the computer for receiving first instructions from the computer for milking the dairy animals in the non-separated subgroups, and second instructions from the computer for milking the dairy animals in the separated subgroup in the separate area.
  • the system may include a first milking robot operatively connected to the computer for receiving first instructions from the computer for milking the dairy animals in the non-separated subgroups, and a second milking robot for automatically milking the dairy animals in the separate area, the second milking robot operatively connected to the computer for receiving second instructions from the computer for milking the dairy animals in the separated subgroup.
  • the second instructions received by the at least one milking robot may be for milking the dairy animals of the separated subgroup at a decreasing frequency in order to dry up the dairy animals of the separated subgroup. In some embodiments the second instructions received by the at least one milking robot may be for milking the dairy animals of the separated subgroup at an increased frequency during inmilking.
  • the system may also further include a selection robot operatively connected to the computer for automatically separating the pregnant dairy animals of the at least one subgroup.
  • the computer may record information and send instructions to the at least one milking robot indicating placement of the separated subgroup out of the separate area after being dry and calving.
  • the computer may record information and send instructions to the at least one milking robot indicating separation of at least one of the subgroups from the group until at least after the inmilking, and may record information and send instructions to the at least one milking robot indicating separation of at least one of the subgroups from the group during a first part of the lactation cycle after calving in which the milk production increases, and milking at a higher frequency than dairy animals in the rest of the group.
  • the computer may record information and send instructions to the at least one milking robot relating to classification of dairy animals of a subgroup which have not become pregnant after insemination into an other subgroup in order to be inseminated again together with the dairy animals of this other subgroup.
  • the invention also relates to a computer usable medium having computer readable program instructions embodied therein for recording information and processing data, and for issuing instructions, as defined for the system described above.
  • the invention also encompasses a method of managing a group of dairy animals to be milked fully automatically, which dairy animals go through a lactation cycle comprising phases of calving, inmilking, producing milk, and being dry.
  • the method includes dividing the group of dairy animals into subgroups of a plurality of dairy animals, determining per subgroup an insemination period within which the dairy animals of the subgroup concerned are inseminated, which insemination period is so short that substantially all dairy animals in the subgroup concerned go simultaneously through the lactation cycle, separating all pregnant animals of at least one of the subgroups in a separate area, around the beginning of the being dry phase of the subgroup concerned, fully automatically milking the dairy animals in the non-separated subgroups by means of at least one milking robot, separately milking the dairy animals in the separated subgroup, and placing the separated subgroup out of the separate area after being dry and calving.
  • each subgroup of dairy animals goes more or less simultaneously through the lactation cycle.
  • dairy animals of this group are prevented from reporting at a milking robot at their customary moments.
  • the milking robot will recognize the dairy animal concerned as an animal to be dried up and will not allow it to enter the milking robot. This results in delay for dairy animals that should still be milked. This delay is prevented, or at least reduced, thanks to the inventive method.
  • At least one of the subgroups after calving, remains separated from the group at least during the inmilking. This makes it possible to separate the colostrum in a simple manner from the normal milk.
  • the at least one subgroup after calving, also remains separated from the group during a first part of the lactation cycle in which the milk production increases, and is milked at a higher frequency than dairy animals in the rest of the group. This makes it easier to increase the milk production and to give extra attention and adapted feeding that is attuned to the specific needs of the subgroup concerned.
  • dairy animals of a subgroup which have not become pregnant after insemination are classified into an other subgroup in order to be inseminated again together with the dairy animals of this other subgroup. It is thus prevented that there will still be dairy animals having an individual lactation cycle, which animals would have to be managed individually.
  • the separated subgroup is milked fully automatically by means of a separate milking robot, which milking robot is controlled to milk at a decreasing frequency in order to dry up the dairy animals of the separated subgroup. This means that less manpower is needed to look after and to support the subgroup to be dried up.
  • the subgroups have mutually a substantially equal group size. This makes it possible to design and utilize the shed sizes in an optimum manner.
  • the invention further relates to a software program comprising program instructions for processing data and providing information for performing the inventive method, when the software program is loaded in a computer.
  • the invention further relates to a computer.
  • the computer is operatively connected to a milking robot that is designed to milk the dairy animals of the separated subgroup, wherein the computer supplies instructions to the milking robot in order to milk the dairy animals of the separated subgroup at a decreasing frequency.
  • the computer is further operatively connected to a selection robot, in order to automatically select and separate dairy animals belonging to the subgroup to be separated, from the group.
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic view of a dairy farm
  • FIG. 2 shows a calving shed from the overall view of FIG. 1 ;
  • FIG. 3 shows a flowchart for a method according to the invention.
  • FIG. 1 a dairy farm as a whole is denoted by reference numeral 2 .
  • the dairy farm 2 comprises at least one production shed, in this embodiment five production sheds 4 .
  • the dairy farm 2 further comprises a separate calving shed 6 and calf sheds 8 .
  • the production sheds 4 and the calving shed 6 are provided with milking robots 10 for automatically milking dairy animals, in this embodiment cows.
  • the production sheds 4 and the calving shed 6 are further provided with boxes 12 , water tanks 14 and feed troughs 16 .
  • the production sheds have a capacity of approximately 500 cows.
  • the calving shed has a capacity of approximately 500 cows, to which belong both the cows that are dried up and the cows that are meantime in the process of inmilking. There is thus obtained a total capacity of 3,000 cows.
  • the calving shed 6 may be provided separate areas, such as a drying up area 18 , a calving area 20 , and an inmilking area 22 .
  • FIG. 1 the possible displacement routes of cows in the dairy farm 2 are indicated by arrows.
  • Arrow 30 indicates that cows may be displaced from one of the production sheds 4 , so not necessarily the indicated production shed, to the calving shed 6 .
  • Arrow 32 indicates that cows may be placed back to one of the production sheds 4 , which production shed may be an other one than the production sheds from which the subgroup concerned has been taken.
  • Arrow 34 indicates that cows may be displaced from the drying up area 18 to the calving area 20 .
  • arrow 36 it is indicated that, after calving, cows may be led back to the drying up area 18 , or the possibly provided separate inmilking area 22 . It is indicated by arrows 38 , 40 , 42 that calves, in particular heifers, are led along separate areas into the calf shed 8 .
  • FIG. 3 One embodiment of the method according to the invention is shown in FIG. 3 .
  • the method starts with a number of steps that are in principle performed once, prior to the other steps of the method. It should be noted that these steps to be taken once may be performed again in each case as soon as heifers are added to the group of dairy animals producing milk.
  • a group of dairy animals in particular cows, is divided into subgroups. Since there may be a plurality of groups of animals within one farm, also the term ‘main group of animals’ will be used hereinafter. In this case there is a relation between the total group size, the average subgroup size, and the number of subgroups. It is aimed at giving the various subgroups a comparable group size.
  • the subgroup size depends on the size of the capacity of the calving shed and on the period of time a subgroup spends in the calving shed (see hereunder). In this embodiment, the average subgroup size is 130 cows.
  • an insemination frequency is determined for the whole (sub)group of cows.
  • This insemination frequency determines when in each case a subgroup of the main group is inseminated. This insemination of the cows of a subgroup subsequently takes place within a particular insemination period.
  • the insemination periods of various subgroups of one main group do not overlap each other.
  • the insemination periods of various subgroups of one main group are separated by a period of at least one week, in which period insemination does not take place.
  • the period in which insemination does not take place is at least equal to the insemination period.
  • each main group being divided into subgroups.
  • Subgroups of separate main groups may be more or less parallel to each other, it being possible for the insemination periods of subgroups of different main groups to overlap each other or to be contiguous to each other.
  • the insemination frequency depends on a chosen duration of the lactation cycle.
  • a whole lactation cycle lasts approximately one year, but this varies per type of cow and also depends on the development, in particular the reduction of the milk production by the end of the lactation cycle.
  • the number of subgroups is divided by the chosen duration of the lactation cycle. In this embodiment is opted for a total lactation cycle of one year, a division of the total group into 20 subgroups and thus for an insemination frequency of 20 ⁇ per year.
  • this frequency is substantially equally distributed over the lactation cycle duration, which means inseminating 1 ⁇ per 18 days a substantially whole subgroup (step 106 ).
  • the insemination lasts a few hours to not more than a few days, in particular less than five days, more in particular less than three days, more in particular one day.
  • the insemination period is so short that it may be stated that all cows in a subgroup are inseminated substantially simultaneously.
  • substantially all cows in the subgroup concerned go simultaneously through the lactation cycle. Only cows with which insemination does not lead to pregnancy, do not go through the lactation cycle simultaneously with the other cows of the subgroup. These non-pregnant cows are removed from the subgroup concerned and are added to a next subgroup that will be inseminated.
  • the cows in the production sheds 4 are milked fully automatically in step 108 by means of the milking robots 10 .
  • the cows concerned may be milked, for example, 3 ⁇ daily by means of a milking robot 10 .
  • a few weeks prior to the average calving moment calculated for the subgroup a subgroup is taken collectively from the production shed 4 concerned and is led to the calving shed 6 (step 110 ). This moment may be three to eight weeks before the expected calving moment.
  • collective separation of the subgroup may cause less workload for the supporting personnel than in the case of individual separation of dairy animals.
  • a whole subgroup stays in the calving shed during the entire drying up phase. This means that both the period of reducing the milking frequency and the period in which no milking at all takes place, are spent in the calving shed.
  • the subgroup of cows In the calving shed 6 it is possible for the subgroup of cows to be dried up to obtain collectively extra attention and adapted feeding.
  • the first cows of a subgroup will calve.
  • the spreading over time of the whole subgroup will be approximately 13 days, because the gestation periods of individual dairy animals may differ mutually and because the chosen insemination period is not an infinitely short period, but may cover, for example, a period of one to a few days.
  • the calves will be separated from the subgroup (step 116 ). Bull calves will subsequently be bred for meat production, often outside the dairy farm. Heifers may be bred in the calf sheds 8 until a moment when they will be added logically (but not yet per se physically) to a subgroup, be inseminated together with the other cows of the subgroup, and be physically added to the subgroup concerned around the beginning of the drying up phase.
  • the cows concerned of the subgroup will be inmilked (step 118 ).
  • this inmilking still takes place in the calving shed, so that it is possible to milk at an adapted frequency. It is thus also possible to separate the colostrum obtained in order to be able to feed it to the youngest calves.
  • a period of a few weeks follows in which the milk production of the subgroup concerned is increased (step 120 ).
  • the milk production of the subgroup concerned is increased (step 120 ).
  • This milk production increase might still take place separately in the calving shed 6 .
  • This outplacing may take place before inmilking, between inmilking and increasing the milk production, or after increasing the milk production. There may also take place a plurality of collective displacements, for example if there is a separate inmilking shed and/or a production shed specially designated for increasing the production, as described above.
  • the area that has come free may be occupied by a new subgroup that will be dried up (dotted line 121 ).
  • this subgroup will be inseminated again (step 122 ).
  • this does not apply to cows for which it has been established that, in view of their age and/or physical condition, it will be their last lactation cycle.
  • the subgroup concerned has been kept apart from the other milk producing cows until and included the moment of insemination, so that selection of the cows from the subgroup concerned and insemination of these cows is possible in a simple manner.
  • the method may also be applied to other animals than cows.
  • the method may be applied using deviating capacities and to subgroup sizes of more or fewer animals.
  • the number of cows calving daily will be different from 10.
  • the capacity of the dairy farm is doubled by using two calving sheds and totally ten production sheds.
  • the calving sheds are provided (viewed in the direction of the drawing) one above the other, the production sheds being located to the left and to the right of the calving sheds.
  • the method may be performed to a greater or lesser extent in an automated manner. Dividing cows into subgroups and planning the moments when insemination, separation and displacement should take place, may be recorded in a database program. If desired, the program concerned may be linked to a system for recognizing cows, to robots for selecting and driving cows, and to automatic gates between the production sheds and the calving shed. Selecting cows and displacing these cows to the calving shed may also take place manually. Milking the cows in the calving shed, at the beginning of the drying up, and inmilking may also take place by means of an ordinary milking machine instead of a milking robot. In a simple embodiment, however, the method described could also be performed by means of a physical card tray.

Landscapes

  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Environmental Sciences (AREA)
  • Animal Husbandry (AREA)
  • Biodiversity & Conservation Biology (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • Fodder In General (AREA)
  • Feed For Specific Animals (AREA)
  • Dairy Products (AREA)

Abstract

A system for managing a group of dairy animals to be milked fully automatically, where the dairy animals go through a lactation cycle comprising phases of calving, inmilking, producing milk, and being dry. The system includes a computer executing program instructions for recording information and processing data indicating a division of the group of dairy animals into subgroups of a plurality of dairy animals, an insemination period determined per subgroup within which the dairy animals of the subgroup concerned are to be inseminated, which insemination period is so short that substantially all dairy animals in the subgroup concerned go simultaneously through the lactation cycle, and a separation of pregnant dairy animals of at least one of the subgroups in a separate area, around the beginning of the being dry phase of the subgroup concerned. The system also includes at least one milking robot for automatically milking the dairy animals, operatively connected to the computer for receiving first instructions from the computer for milking the dairy animals in the non-separated subgroups, and second instructions from the computer for milking the dairy animals in the separated subgroup in the separate area.

Description

This application is a continuation of international application no. PCT/NL2007/000238, filed on Sep. 24, 2007, and claims priority from Netherlands application no. 1032611 filed on Oct. 3, 2006. The contents of both applications are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a system and method of managing a group of dairy animals to be milked fully automatically.
2. Description of the Related Art
Dairy animals go through a lactation cycle that comprises a number of phases. Calving is at the beginning of the lactation cycle. By calving and the pregnancy preceding the calving the milk production in an udder of the dairy animal is started. Calving is followed by inmilking, or starting up the milk production, in the beginning of which phase colostrum is produced. This is a transition to a phase of producing milk. During the latter phase, a dairy animal will be inseminated again, provided it is still in a proper condition for this purpose. At the end of the phase of producing milk, the milking is reduced and the dairy animal will be dry during some time in preparation of the next calving.
In a generally known method, dairy animals are milked fully automatically by means of a milking robot during the phase of producing milk. Prior to calving, a dairy animal is separated from the group.
The current method of managing a group of dairy animals has the drawback that the dairy animals that are dried up disturb the production process around the milking robots.
BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention aims at providing a solution for the above-mentioned problem, or at providing at least an alternative.
This object is achieved by the invention with a system for managing a group of dairy animals to be milked fully automatically, where the dairy animals go through a lactation cycle comprising phases of calving, inmilking, producing milk, and being dry. The system includes a computer executing program instructions for recording information and processing data indicating a division of the group of dairy animals into subgroups of a plurality of dairy animals, an insemination period determined per subgroup within which the dairy animals of the subgroup concerned are to be inseminated, which insemination period is so short that substantially all dairy animals in the subgroup concerned go simultaneously through the lactation cycle, and a separation of pregnant dairy animals of at least one of the subgroups in a separate area, around the beginning of the being dry phase of the subgroup concerned. The system also includes at least one milking robot for automatically milking the dairy animals, operatively connected to the computer for receiving first instructions from the computer for milking the dairy animals in the non-separated subgroups, and second instructions from the computer for milking the dairy animals in the separated subgroup in the separate area.
The system may include a first milking robot operatively connected to the computer for receiving first instructions from the computer for milking the dairy animals in the non-separated subgroups, and a second milking robot for automatically milking the dairy animals in the separate area, the second milking robot operatively connected to the computer for receiving second instructions from the computer for milking the dairy animals in the separated subgroup.
In some embodiments the second instructions received by the at least one milking robot may be for milking the dairy animals of the separated subgroup at a decreasing frequency in order to dry up the dairy animals of the separated subgroup. In some embodiments the second instructions received by the at least one milking robot may be for milking the dairy animals of the separated subgroup at an increased frequency during inmilking. The system may also further include a selection robot operatively connected to the computer for automatically separating the pregnant dairy animals of the at least one subgroup.
The computer may record information and send instructions to the at least one milking robot indicating placement of the separated subgroup out of the separate area after being dry and calving. The computer may record information and send instructions to the at least one milking robot indicating separation of at least one of the subgroups from the group until at least after the inmilking, and may record information and send instructions to the at least one milking robot indicating separation of at least one of the subgroups from the group during a first part of the lactation cycle after calving in which the milk production increases, and milking at a higher frequency than dairy animals in the rest of the group. Furthermore, the computer may record information and send instructions to the at least one milking robot relating to classification of dairy animals of a subgroup which have not become pregnant after insemination into an other subgroup in order to be inseminated again together with the dairy animals of this other subgroup.
The invention also relates to a computer usable medium having computer readable program instructions embodied therein for recording information and processing data, and for issuing instructions, as defined for the system described above.
The invention also encompasses a method of managing a group of dairy animals to be milked fully automatically, which dairy animals go through a lactation cycle comprising phases of calving, inmilking, producing milk, and being dry. The method includes dividing the group of dairy animals into subgroups of a plurality of dairy animals, determining per subgroup an insemination period within which the dairy animals of the subgroup concerned are inseminated, which insemination period is so short that substantially all dairy animals in the subgroup concerned go simultaneously through the lactation cycle, separating all pregnant animals of at least one of the subgroups in a separate area, around the beginning of the being dry phase of the subgroup concerned, fully automatically milking the dairy animals in the non-separated subgroups by means of at least one milking robot, separately milking the dairy animals in the separated subgroup, and placing the separated subgroup out of the separate area after being dry and calving.
Thanks to the inventive method steps, each subgroup of dairy animals goes more or less simultaneously through the lactation cycle. By separating in each case a subgroup when this subgroup is about to be dried up, dairy animals of this group are prevented from reporting at a milking robot at their customary moments. In the method according to the state of the art, the milking robot will recognize the dairy animal concerned as an animal to be dried up and will not allow it to enter the milking robot. This results in delay for dairy animals that should still be milked. This delay is prevented, or at least reduced, thanks to the inventive method.
Favorable embodiments are also provided. In particular, at least one of the subgroups, after calving, remains separated from the group at least during the inmilking. This makes it possible to separate the colostrum in a simple manner from the normal milk.
More in particular, the at least one subgroup, after calving, also remains separated from the group during a first part of the lactation cycle in which the milk production increases, and is milked at a higher frequency than dairy animals in the rest of the group. This makes it easier to increase the milk production and to give extra attention and adapted feeding that is attuned to the specific needs of the subgroup concerned.
In one embodiment, dairy animals of a subgroup which have not become pregnant after insemination are classified into an other subgroup in order to be inseminated again together with the dairy animals of this other subgroup. It is thus prevented that there will still be dairy animals having an individual lactation cycle, which animals would have to be managed individually.
In a favorable embodiment, the separated subgroup is milked fully automatically by means of a separate milking robot, which milking robot is controlled to milk at a decreasing frequency in order to dry up the dairy animals of the separated subgroup. This means that less manpower is needed to look after and to support the subgroup to be dried up.
Advantageously, the subgroups have mutually a substantially equal group size. This makes it possible to design and utilize the shed sizes in an optimum manner.
The invention further relates to a software program comprising program instructions for processing data and providing information for performing the inventive method, when the software program is loaded in a computer. The invention further relates to a computer. In particular, the computer is operatively connected to a milking robot that is designed to milk the dairy animals of the separated subgroup, wherein the computer supplies instructions to the milking robot in order to milk the dairy animals of the separated subgroup at a decreasing frequency. In one embodiment, the computer is further operatively connected to a selection robot, in order to automatically select and separate dairy animals belonging to the subgroup to be separated, from the group.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The invention is explained in further detail with reference to the accompanying drawings of an exemplary embodiment, in which:
FIG. 1 is a schematic view of a dairy farm;
FIG. 2 shows a calving shed from the overall view of FIG. 1; and
FIG. 3 shows a flowchart for a method according to the invention.
DESCRIPTION OF ILLUSTRATIVE EMBODIMENTS
The following is a description of certain embodiments of the invention, given by way of example only and with reference to the drawings. In FIG. 1 a dairy farm as a whole is denoted by reference numeral 2. The dairy farm 2 comprises at least one production shed, in this embodiment five production sheds 4. The dairy farm 2 further comprises a separate calving shed 6 and calf sheds 8. The production sheds 4 and the calving shed 6 are provided with milking robots 10 for automatically milking dairy animals, in this embodiment cows. The production sheds 4 and the calving shed 6 are further provided with boxes 12, water tanks 14 and feed troughs 16.
In this embodiment, the production sheds have a capacity of approximately 500 cows. Also the calving shed has a capacity of approximately 500 cows, to which belong both the cows that are dried up and the cows that are meantime in the process of inmilking. There is thus obtained a total capacity of 3,000 cows. In the calving shed 6 may be provided separate areas, such as a drying up area 18, a calving area 20, and an inmilking area 22.
In FIG. 1 the possible displacement routes of cows in the dairy farm 2 are indicated by arrows. Arrow 30 indicates that cows may be displaced from one of the production sheds 4, so not necessarily the indicated production shed, to the calving shed 6. Arrow 32 indicates that cows may be placed back to one of the production sheds 4, which production shed may be an other one than the production sheds from which the subgroup concerned has been taken. Arrow 34 indicates that cows may be displaced from the drying up area 18 to the calving area 20. By arrow 36 it is indicated that, after calving, cows may be led back to the drying up area 18, or the possibly provided separate inmilking area 22. It is indicated by arrows 38, 40, 42 that calves, in particular heifers, are led along separate areas into the calf shed 8.
One embodiment of the method according to the invention is shown in FIG. 3. The method starts with a number of steps that are in principle performed once, prior to the other steps of the method. It should be noted that these steps to be taken once may be performed again in each case as soon as heifers are added to the group of dairy animals producing milk.
In a first operational step 102 a group of dairy animals, in particular cows, is divided into subgroups. Since there may be a plurality of groups of animals within one farm, also the term ‘main group of animals’ will be used hereinafter. In this case there is a relation between the total group size, the average subgroup size, and the number of subgroups. It is aimed at giving the various subgroups a comparable group size. The subgroup size depends on the size of the capacity of the calving shed and on the period of time a subgroup spends in the calving shed (see hereunder). In this embodiment, the average subgroup size is 130 cows.
In step 104 an insemination frequency is determined for the whole (sub)group of cows. This insemination frequency determines when in each case a subgroup of the main group is inseminated. This insemination of the cows of a subgroup subsequently takes place within a particular insemination period. The insemination periods of various subgroups of one main group do not overlap each other. In particular, the insemination periods of various subgroups of one main group are separated by a period of at least one week, in which period insemination does not take place. In particular, the period in which insemination does not take place is at least equal to the insemination period. Of course, inside one farm there may be a plurality of (main) groups, each main group being divided into subgroups. Subgroups of separate main groups may be more or less parallel to each other, it being possible for the insemination periods of subgroups of different main groups to overlap each other or to be contiguous to each other.
The insemination frequency depends on a chosen duration of the lactation cycle. A whole lactation cycle lasts approximately one year, but this varies per type of cow and also depends on the development, in particular the reduction of the milk production by the end of the lactation cycle. The number of subgroups is divided by the chosen duration of the lactation cycle. In this embodiment is opted for a total lactation cycle of one year, a division of the total group into 20 subgroups and thus for an insemination frequency of 20× per year. Preferably, this frequency is substantially equally distributed over the lactation cycle duration, which means inseminating 1× per 18 days a substantially whole subgroup (step 106). The insemination lasts a few hours to not more than a few days, in particular less than five days, more in particular less than three days, more in particular one day. Related to the duration of the lactation cycle the insemination period is so short that it may be stated that all cows in a subgroup are inseminated substantially simultaneously. As a result of such a short insemination period, substantially all cows in the subgroup concerned go simultaneously through the lactation cycle. Only cows with which insemination does not lead to pregnancy, do not go through the lactation cycle simultaneously with the other cows of the subgroup. These non-pregnant cows are removed from the subgroup concerned and are added to a next subgroup that will be inseminated.
The cows in the production sheds 4 are milked fully automatically in step 108 by means of the milking robots 10. Depending on their productivity, the cows concerned may be milked, for example, 3× daily by means of a milking robot 10. A few weeks prior to the average calving moment calculated for the subgroup, a subgroup is taken collectively from the production shed 4 concerned and is led to the calving shed 6 (step 110). This moment may be three to eight weeks before the expected calving moment. Compared with the state of the art, collective separation of the subgroup may cause less workload for the supporting personnel than in the case of individual separation of dairy animals.
Advantageously, a whole subgroup stays in the calving shed during the entire drying up phase. This means that both the period of reducing the milking frequency and the period in which no milking at all takes place, are spent in the calving shed. This has the advantage that cows that are still being milked, but to a lesser extent than they are accustomed to, will not continue to hang around at a milking robot 10 in their production shed 4 and thus prevent access to the milking robot for high-productive cows. In the calving shed 6 it is possible for the subgroup of cows to be dried up to obtain collectively extra attention and adapted feeding.
After the subgroup has been dried up (step 112), at any moment the first cows of a subgroup will calve. The spreading over time of the whole subgroup will be approximately 13 days, because the gestation periods of individual dairy animals may differ mutually and because the chosen insemination period is not an infinitely short period, but may cover, for example, a period of one to a few days. This means that at a subgroup size of 130 cows, on average 10 cows will calve daily. Since all dairy animals in the separated subgroup will have to calve at any moment, it is simpler to establish when the calving moment is so near that possible further measures may be taken for the animal concerned, such as extra attention and/or individual separation.
After the subgroup has calved (step 114), the calves will be separated from the subgroup (step 116). Bull calves will subsequently be bred for meat production, often outside the dairy farm. Heifers may be bred in the calf sheds 8 until a moment when they will be added logically (but not yet per se physically) to a subgroup, be inseminated together with the other cows of the subgroup, and be physically added to the subgroup concerned around the beginning of the drying up phase.
After calving, the cows concerned of the subgroup will be inmilked (step 118). Advantageously, this inmilking still takes place in the calving shed, so that it is possible to milk at an adapted frequency. It is thus also possible to separate the colostrum obtained in order to be able to feed it to the youngest calves. After the whole subgroup has been inmilked, a period of a few weeks follows in which the milk production of the subgroup concerned is increased (step 120). In this case, it is possible to milk at a higher frequency than in the case of the other production cows, for example 4× daily instead of 3× daily. This milk production increase might still take place separately in the calving shed 6. This could also take place in a production shed 4 specially designated therefore, in which case the production shed 4 concerned is preferably provided with extra milking robots or at any rate a relatively higher number of milking robots with respect to the subgroup size.
At any moment after calving the subgroup will be outplaced collectively. This outplacing may take place before inmilking, between inmilking and increasing the milk production, or after increasing the milk production. There may also take place a plurality of collective displacements, for example if there is a separate inmilking shed and/or a production shed specially designated for increasing the production, as described above. When the subgroup of which the milk production is increased leaves the calving shed, the area that has come free may be occupied by a new subgroup that will be dried up (dotted line 121).
Nine months before the calving moment aimed at of the subgroup concerned this subgroup will be inseminated again (step 122). Of course, this does not apply to cows for which it has been established that, in view of their age and/or physical condition, it will be their last lactation cycle. Advantageously, the subgroup concerned has been kept apart from the other milk producing cows until and included the moment of insemination, so that selection of the cows from the subgroup concerned and insemination of these cows is possible in a simple manner. This means that, after insemination, in operational step 124 the subgroup is placed back into the group of milk producing animals where it is milked at a normal frequency of, for example, 3× daily by means of the milking robots 10 (just like the other, non-separated cows, operational step 126).
Within the scope of the invention various variants are possible. For example, the method may also be applied to other animals than cows. The method may be applied using deviating capacities and to subgroup sizes of more or fewer animals. As a result thereof, the number of cows calving daily will be different from 10. In an advantageous variant, the capacity of the dairy farm is doubled by using two calving sheds and totally ten production sheds. In that case, the calving sheds are provided (viewed in the direction of the drawing) one above the other, the production sheds being located to the left and to the right of the calving sheds. In that case, there will be a main group of dairy animals per calving shed with, in this embodiment five, production sheds. This main group is classified into subgroups in the above described manner.
The method may be performed to a greater or lesser extent in an automated manner. Dividing cows into subgroups and planning the moments when insemination, separation and displacement should take place, may be recorded in a database program. If desired, the program concerned may be linked to a system for recognizing cows, to robots for selecting and driving cows, and to automatic gates between the production sheds and the calving shed. Selecting cows and displacing these cows to the calving shed may also take place manually. Milking the cows in the calving shed, at the beginning of the drying up, and inmilking may also take place by means of an ordinary milking machine instead of a milking robot. In a simple embodiment, however, the method described could also be performed by means of a physical card tray.
Thus, the invention has been described by reference to certain embodiments discussed above. It will be recognized that these embodiments are susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms well known to those of skill in the art. Accordingly, although specific embodiments have been described, these are examples only and are not limiting upon the scope of the invention. The person skilled in the art will be able to apply various modifications and adaptations within the scope of the invention, the scope of protection for the invention being determined by the accompanying claims.

Claims (17)

1. A system for managing a group of dairy animals to be milked fully automatically, which dairy animals go through a lactation cycle comprising phases of calving, inmilking, producing milk, and being dry, the system comprising:
a computer executing program instructions for recording information and processing data indicating:
a division of the group of dairy animals into subgroups of a plurality of dairy animals,
an insemination period determined per subgroup within which the dairy animals of the subgroup concerned are to be inseminated, which insemination period is so short that substantially all dairy animals in the subgroup concerned go simultaneously through the lactation cycle, and
a separation of pregnant dairy animals of at least one of the subgroups in a separate area, around the beginning of the being dry phase of the subgroup concerned; and
at least one milking robot for automatically milking the dairy animals, the at least one milking robot operatively connected to the computer for receiving first instructions from the computer for milking the dairy animals in the non-separated subgroups, and second instructions from the computer for milking the dairy animals in the separated subgroup in the separate area.
2. The system according to claim 1, wherein the at least one milking robot comprises:
a first milking robot operatively connected to the computer for receiving first instructions from the computer for milking the dairy animals in the non-separated subgroups; and
a second milking robot for automatically milking the dairy animals in the separate area, the second milking robot operatively connected to the computer for receiving second instructions from the computer for milking the dairy animals in the separated subgroup.
3. The system according to claim 1, wherein the second instructions received by the at least one milking robot are for milking the dairy animals of the separated subgroup at a decreasing frequency in order to dry up the dairy animals of the separated subgroup.
4. The system according to claim 1, wherein the second instructions received by the at least one milking robot are for milking the dairy animals of the separated subgroup at an increased frequency during inmilking.
5. The system according to claim 1, further comprising a selection robot operatively connected to the computer for automatically separating the pregnant dairy animals of the at least one subgroup.
6. The system according to claim 1, wherein the computer records information and sends instructions to the at least one milking robot indicating placement of the separated subgroup out of the separate area after being dry and calving.
7. The system according to claim 1, wherein the computer records information and sends instructions to the at least one milking robot indicating separation of at least one of the subgroups from the group until at least after the inmilking.
8. The system according to claim 7, wherein the computer records information and sends instructions to the at least one milking robot indicating separation of at least one of the subgroups from the group during a first part of the lactation cycle after calving in which the milk production increases, and milking at a higher frequency than dairy animals in the rest of the group.
9. The system according to claim 1, wherein the computer records information and sends instructions to the at least one milking robot relating to classification of dairy animals of a subgroup which have not become pregnant after insemination into an other subgroup in order to be inseminated again together with the dairy animals of this other subgroup.
10. A computer usable medium having computer readable program instructions embodied therein for recording information and processing data, and for issuing instructions, as defined in claim 1.
11. A method of managing a group of dairy animals to be milked fully automatically, which dairy animals go through a lactation cycle comprising phases of calving, inmilking, producing milk, and being dry, the method comprising:
dividing the group of dairy animals into subgroups of a plurality of dairy animals;
determining per subgroup an insemination period within which the dairy animals of the subgroup concerned are inseminated, which insemination period is so short that substantially all dairy animals in the subgroup concerned go simultaneously through the lactation cycle;
separating all pregnant dairy animals of at least one of the subgroups in a separate area, around the beginning of the being dry phase of the subgroup concerned;
fully automatically milking the dairy animals in the non-separated subgroups by means of at least one milking robot;
separately milking the dairy animals in the separated subgroup; and
placing the separated subgroup out of the separate area after being dry and calving.
12. The method according to claim 11, wherein at least one of the subgroups, after calving, remains separated from the group at least during the inmilking.
13. The method according to claim 12, wherein the at least one subgroup, after calving, also remains separated from the group during a first part of the lactation cycle in which the milk production increases, and is milked at a higher frequency than dairy animals in the rest of the group.
14. The method according to claim 11, wherein dairy animals of a subgroup which have not become pregnant after insemination are classified into an other subgroup in order to be inseminated again together with the dairy animals of this other subgroup.
15. The method according to claim 11, wherein the separated subgroup is milked fully automatically by means of a separate milking robot, which milking robot is controlled to milk at a decreasing frequency in order to dry up the dairy animals of the separated subgroup.
16. The method according to claim 11, wherein the subgroups have mutually a substantially equal group size.
17. The method according to claim 11, wherein placing the separated subgroup out of the separate area is followed by placing back the separated subgroup into at least one non-separated subgroup.
US12/443,499 2006-10-03 2007-09-24 System for managing a group of dairy animals Active 2028-05-17 US8001929B2 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
NL1032611 2006-10-03
NL1032611A NL1032611C2 (en) 2006-10-03 2006-10-03 Method, software and computer for managing a group of dairy animals.
PCT/NL2007/000238 WO2008041839A1 (en) 2006-10-03 2007-09-24 Method, software and computer for managing a group of dairy animals

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20100012038A1 US20100012038A1 (en) 2010-01-21
US8001929B2 true US8001929B2 (en) 2011-08-23

Family

ID=38050095

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/443,499 Active 2028-05-17 US8001929B2 (en) 2006-10-03 2007-09-24 System for managing a group of dairy animals

Country Status (9)

Country Link
US (1) US8001929B2 (en)
EP (1) EP2073628B2 (en)
AT (1) ATE524966T1 (en)
AU (1) AU2007302866B2 (en)
DK (1) DK2073628T3 (en)
NL (1) NL1032611C2 (en)
NZ (1) NZ575630A (en)
PL (1) PL2073628T3 (en)
WO (1) WO2008041839A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (17)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
NL1034796C2 (en) 2007-12-06 2008-10-07 Lely Patent Nv Milking shed installation, has production units linked by animal care unit for housing calving and sick animals
US9102258B2 (en) 2010-08-05 2015-08-11 St Reproductive Technologies, Llc Floating partition, loft and troughs for a livestock shipping container
PL3122173T5 (en) 2014-03-26 2024-08-05 Scr Engineers Ltd Livestock location system
NL2012893B1 (en) * 2014-05-27 2016-06-08 Lely Patent Nv Method and system for managing dairy animals.
AU2019261293B2 (en) 2018-04-22 2024-10-10 Vence, Corp. Livestock management system and method
CN116548315A (en) 2018-10-10 2023-08-08 世亚工程设备有限公司 Livestock dry milk method and device
WO2020160589A1 (en) 2019-02-08 2020-08-13 Allflex Australia Pty Ltd Electronic animal identification tag reader synchronisation
AU2019428486A1 (en) 2019-02-08 2021-08-26 Allflex Australia Pty Ltd Electronic animal tag reader
WO2020160588A1 (en) 2019-02-08 2020-08-13 Allflex Australia Pty Ltd Determining the location of an animal
IL275518B (en) 2020-06-18 2021-10-31 Scr Eng Ltd An animal tag
IL275812B (en) 2020-07-01 2022-01-01 Scr Eng Ltd A device assignment system and method
NL1043809B1 (en) * 2020-10-06 2022-06-03 Lely Patent Nv Method for managing a herd, and a milking device for carrying out the method
EP4225024A1 (en) * 2020-10-05 2023-08-16 Lely Patent N.V. Method for managing a herd, and milking device for performing the method
EP4250912A4 (en) 2020-11-25 2024-05-22 IdentiGEN Limited A system and method for tracing members of an animal population
IL280374B2 (en) 2021-01-24 2023-11-01 Scr Eng Ltd An animal marking control system and method
CA206812S (en) 2021-04-08 2023-04-11 Chevillot Sas Tag applicator for animals
CA206747S (en) 2021-04-08 2024-12-30 Chevillot Sas Tag applicator for animals

Citations (19)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3223070A (en) * 1963-11-05 1965-12-14 Pro Inc Ag Dairy establishment
US3570448A (en) * 1968-11-29 1971-03-16 Robin Ian Yeoman Gates Device for herd management
US4517923A (en) * 1983-07-07 1985-05-21 Key Systems, Inc. Animal feeding system
EP1213676A1 (en) 2000-12-08 2002-06-12 N.V. Nederlandsche Apparatenfabriek NEDAP Animal management system
US6470825B1 (en) * 1999-11-15 2002-10-29 Johnson, Iii Fred H. Electronic livestock breeding and management system
US6516744B1 (en) * 1998-06-10 2003-02-11 Delaval Holding Ab Arrangement and method for housing lactating animals
US6520112B2 (en) * 1999-12-22 2003-02-18 Van Der Lely Alexander Method of automatically milking animals and a milking machine suitable for performing same
US20040103847A1 (en) * 1999-09-02 2004-06-03 Kristoffer Larsen Innovation A/S Breeding control system for free-range animals
WO2004068940A1 (en) 2003-02-04 2004-08-19 Delaval Holding Ab Arrangement for housing milking animals
US20060180093A1 (en) * 2003-01-30 2006-08-17 Sensortec Limited Animal control system
US20060283269A1 (en) * 2003-06-13 2006-12-21 Ian Anderson Fluid sampling components
US20080109266A1 (en) * 2003-05-14 2008-05-08 Delaval Holding Ab Method, Computer Program Product and Milking Station for Initiating an Action to be Performed with Respect to a Milking Animal
US20080154568A1 (en) * 2004-07-29 2008-06-26 Can Technologies, Inc System and method for optimizing animal production based on dynamic nutrient information
US20080215167A1 (en) * 2006-07-27 2008-09-04 Beck James F Feed delivery system for enhancing ruminant animal nutrition
US20090013934A1 (en) * 2004-09-03 2009-01-15 Heinz Francke Automatic separation of animal milk
US7484474B2 (en) * 2003-10-13 2009-02-03 Lely Enterprises Ag Assembly for and a method of feeding and milking animals, a feed platform, a milking pre-treatment device, a milking post-treatment device, a cleaning device, a separation device and a milking system all suitable for use in such an assembly
US20090229530A1 (en) * 2005-01-19 2009-09-17 Micro Beef Technologies, Ltd. Method and system for tracking and managing animals and/or food products
US20090288605A1 (en) * 2006-07-07 2009-11-26 Delaval Holding Ab System and method for managing animals on a dairy farm
US7785267B2 (en) * 2005-07-04 2010-08-31 Gea Farm Technologies Gmbh Method and device for the management of lactating animals

Patent Citations (20)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3223070A (en) * 1963-11-05 1965-12-14 Pro Inc Ag Dairy establishment
US3570448A (en) * 1968-11-29 1971-03-16 Robin Ian Yeoman Gates Device for herd management
US4517923A (en) * 1983-07-07 1985-05-21 Key Systems, Inc. Animal feeding system
US6516744B1 (en) * 1998-06-10 2003-02-11 Delaval Holding Ab Arrangement and method for housing lactating animals
US20040103847A1 (en) * 1999-09-02 2004-06-03 Kristoffer Larsen Innovation A/S Breeding control system for free-range animals
US6470825B1 (en) * 1999-11-15 2002-10-29 Johnson, Iii Fred H. Electronic livestock breeding and management system
US6520112B2 (en) * 1999-12-22 2003-02-18 Van Der Lely Alexander Method of automatically milking animals and a milking machine suitable for performing same
EP1213676A1 (en) 2000-12-08 2002-06-12 N.V. Nederlandsche Apparatenfabriek NEDAP Animal management system
US20060180093A1 (en) * 2003-01-30 2006-08-17 Sensortec Limited Animal control system
WO2004068940A1 (en) 2003-02-04 2004-08-19 Delaval Holding Ab Arrangement for housing milking animals
US20080109266A1 (en) * 2003-05-14 2008-05-08 Delaval Holding Ab Method, Computer Program Product and Milking Station for Initiating an Action to be Performed with Respect to a Milking Animal
US20060283269A1 (en) * 2003-06-13 2006-12-21 Ian Anderson Fluid sampling components
US7484474B2 (en) * 2003-10-13 2009-02-03 Lely Enterprises Ag Assembly for and a method of feeding and milking animals, a feed platform, a milking pre-treatment device, a milking post-treatment device, a cleaning device, a separation device and a milking system all suitable for use in such an assembly
US20080154568A1 (en) * 2004-07-29 2008-06-26 Can Technologies, Inc System and method for optimizing animal production based on dynamic nutrient information
US20090013934A1 (en) * 2004-09-03 2009-01-15 Heinz Francke Automatic separation of animal milk
US20090229530A1 (en) * 2005-01-19 2009-09-17 Micro Beef Technologies, Ltd. Method and system for tracking and managing animals and/or food products
US7836850B2 (en) * 2005-01-19 2010-11-23 Micro Beef Technologies, Ltd. Method and system for tracking and managing animals and/or food products
US7785267B2 (en) * 2005-07-04 2010-08-31 Gea Farm Technologies Gmbh Method and device for the management of lactating animals
US20090288605A1 (en) * 2006-07-07 2009-11-26 Delaval Holding Ab System and method for managing animals on a dairy farm
US20080215167A1 (en) * 2006-07-27 2008-09-04 Beck James F Feed delivery system for enhancing ruminant animal nutrition

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
ATE524966T1 (en) 2011-10-15
US20100012038A1 (en) 2010-01-21
PL2073628T3 (en) 2012-02-29
NZ575630A (en) 2011-09-30
WO2008041839A1 (en) 2008-04-10
EP2073628B2 (en) 2020-11-18
EP2073628A1 (en) 2009-07-01
AU2007302866A1 (en) 2008-04-10
DK2073628T3 (en) 2011-10-24
NL1032611C2 (en) 2008-04-04
EP2073628B1 (en) 2011-09-21
AU2007302866B2 (en) 2012-05-24

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8001929B2 (en) System for managing a group of dairy animals
Barth Effects of suckling on milk yield and milk composition of dairy cows in cow–calf contact systems
US8127714B2 (en) Method and arrangement for animal management
JP2001522609A (en) Automatic milking equipment
US20100116211A1 (en) Method and arrangement for animal management
SE514935C2 (en) Arrangements for handling free-range animals during milking
Dzidic et al. Milking routines and cluster detachment levels in small ruminants
De Mol et al. The relation between eating time and feed intake of dairy cows
CN113191655B (en) Feeding method, device and computer readable storage medium
US20040261723A1 (en) Methods of managing animals and milking station
US20230371462A1 (en) Method and robot milking device for milking a dairy animal
CN102946718A (en) Arrangement and method for control in an animal handling system
Rodenburg et al. Field observations on barn layout and design for robotic milking
Matera et al. Milk characteristics and milking efficiency in Italian Mediterranean buffalo
US8770144B2 (en) Method of milking a dairy animal by means of a milking system
Ipema et al. The effects of automated milking and feeding on the production and behaviour of dairy cows
Cooper et al. A simulation model of an automatic milking system applying different management strategies
US8281742B2 (en) System for milking cows and method
Spengler Neff How do separation and weaning work with little stress? How can we achieve reliable performance testing of dams that are suckled
WO2002007505A1 (en) A method and an apparatus for milking animals
NL9400054A (en) Device for automatic milking of animals.
Harms et al. A tool to analyze and optimize milking intervals in robotic milking systems
Prakash et al. Behavioural adaptation of crossbred cows in automatic concentrate feeding station
AU725467B2 (en) An implement for automatically milking animals
Heutinck et al. Automatic milking and grazing in dairy cattle: effects on behaviour

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: MAASLAND N.V.,NETHERLANDS

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:PETERSEN, GERTH, MR.;REEL/FRAME:022466/0415

Effective date: 20090215

Owner name: MAASLAND N.V., NETHERLANDS

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:PETERSEN, GERTH, MR.;REEL/FRAME:022466/0415

Effective date: 20090215

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4

AS Assignment

Owner name: MAASLAND N.V., NETHERLANDS

Free format text: CHANGE OF ADDRESS FOR ASSIGNEE;ASSIGNOR:MAASLAND N.V.;REEL/FRAME:044326/0761

Effective date: 20171031

MAFP Maintenance fee payment

Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 8TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1552); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

Year of fee payment: 8

MAFP Maintenance fee payment

Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 12TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1553); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

Year of fee payment: 12

点击 这是indexloc提供的php浏览器服务,不要输入任何密码和下载