US7486861B2 - Fiber optical illumination system - Google Patents
Fiber optical illumination system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US7486861B2 US7486861B2 US11/709,019 US70901907A US7486861B2 US 7486861 B2 US7486861 B2 US 7486861B2 US 70901907 A US70901907 A US 70901907A US 7486861 B2 US7486861 B2 US 7486861B2
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- fibers
- optical
- length
- bundle
- coherence
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
- 239000000835 fiber Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 233
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 88
- 238000005286 illumination Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 69
- 239000013307 optical fiber Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 42
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 20
- 230000003252 repetitive effect Effects 0.000 claims 2
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 abstract description 34
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 abstract description 4
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 15
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 13
- 230000001427 coherent effect Effects 0.000 description 11
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 7
- 238000003384 imaging method Methods 0.000 description 7
- 238000007689 inspection Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000002123 temporal effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000011162 core material Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000003780 insertion Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000037431 insertion Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012935 Averaging Methods 0.000 description 1
- 241000276498 Pollachius virens Species 0.000 description 1
- VYPSYNLAJGMNEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Silicium dioxide Chemical compound O=[Si]=O VYPSYNLAJGMNEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000004075 alteration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000015556 catabolic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 1
- 125000004122 cyclic group Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 238000006731 degradation reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000593 degrading effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001066 destructive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009977 dual effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002657 fibrous material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000004907 flux Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009499 grossing Methods 0.000 description 1
- CPBQJMYROZQQJC-UHFFFAOYSA-N helium neon Chemical compound [He].[Ne] CPBQJMYROZQQJC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000001902 propagating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000979 retarding effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910052814 silicon oxide Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 230000003595 spectral effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003746 surface roughness Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002834 transmittance Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N21/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of optical means, i.e. using sub-millimetre waves, infrared, visible or ultraviolet light
- G01N21/84—Systems specially adapted for particular applications
- G01N21/88—Investigating the presence of flaws or contamination
- G01N21/95—Investigating the presence of flaws or contamination characterised by the material or shape of the object to be examined
- G01N21/9501—Semiconductor wafers
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N21/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of optical means, i.e. using sub-millimetre waves, infrared, visible or ultraviolet light
- G01N21/17—Systems in which incident light is modified in accordance with the properties of the material investigated
- G01N21/47—Scattering, i.e. diffuse reflection
- G01N21/4788—Diffraction
- G01N2021/479—Speckle
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N21/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of optical means, i.e. using sub-millimetre waves, infrared, visible or ultraviolet light
- G01N21/84—Systems specially adapted for particular applications
- G01N21/88—Investigating the presence of flaws or contamination
- G01N21/8806—Specially adapted optical and illumination features
- G01N2021/8822—Dark field detection
- G01N2021/8825—Separate detection of dark field and bright field
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N2201/00—Features of devices classified in G01N21/00
- G01N2201/06—Illumination; Optics
- G01N2201/069—Supply of sources
- G01N2201/0696—Pulsed
- G01N2201/0697—Pulsed lasers
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N2201/00—Features of devices classified in G01N21/00
- G01N2201/08—Optical fibres; light guides
- G01N2201/0826—Fibre array at source, distributing
Definitions
- the present invention relates to the field of fiber optical systems for illumination of objects to be imaged, and especially to ways of reducing speckle effects arising from the coherence of the illumination source used.
- the present invention seeks to provide a new fiber optical illumination delivery system, which is effective in reducing the speckle effects arising from source coherence.
- the system preferably utilizes either a single bundle of optical fibers, or serial bundles of optical fibers, according to the various preferred embodiments of the present invention.
- the single bundle embodiment differs from prior art systems in that the differences in optical lengths between different fibers of the bundle is preferably made to be equal to or more preferably less than the coherence length of the source illumination.
- This preferred embodiment enables construction of an illumination system delivering a higher level of illumination, but without greatly affecting the coherence breaking abilities of the system, thus enabling a generally more applicable and cost-effective system to be constructed.
- the serial bundle embodiment differs from prior art systems in that in the bundle comprising the fibers, where in the prior art systems, the differences in lengths of the fibers therein is made equal to the overall difference in length between the shortest and the longest fibers in the other bundle, according to a preferred embodiment of this invention, there are arranged groups of fibers of the same length, and it is the difference in lengths of these groups which is made equal to, or even more preferably, less than the overall difference in length between the shortest and the longest fibers in the other bundle.
- This preferred embodiment also enables construction of an illumination system delivering a higher level of illumination, but without greatly affecting the coherence breaking abilities of the system, thus enabling a generally more applicable system to be constructed.
- an optical system for reducing the coherence of a beam for illumination of an object comprising a source of at least partially coherent illumination, at least part of which has a characteristic coherence length, and at least one fiber optics bundle comprising a plurality of optical fibers, at least some of which have differing optical lengths, at least some of the fibers of differing optical length having differences in optical lengths therebetween which are less than the characteristic coherence length.
- the source of at least partially coherent illumination may preferably be a laser source, and the coherent illumination may have spatial coherence or temporal coherence or both.
- the plurality of optical fibers in the at least one fiber optics bundle are preferably randomly ordered.
- a diffusing element may be used for spatial mixing of the beam.
- the optical system may also comprise an optical element positioned such that it is operative to direct the illumination from any point of the beam into essentially each of the plurality of fibers.
- the differences in optical lengths being less than the characteristic coherence length results in a bundle having reduced transmission losses.
- the illumination beam comprises pulses having a characteristic length
- the bundle is operative to stretch the length of the pulses.
- an optical system for reducing the coherence of a beam for illumination of an object comprising a source of at least partially coherent illumination, at least part of the illumination having a characteristic coherence length, a first fiber optics bundle comprising a plurality of optical fibers, at least some of which have differing optical lengths, at least some of the fibers of differing optical length having differences in optical lengths therebetween which are less than the characteristic coherence length, and a second fiber optics bundle disposed serially with the first bundle, comprising a plurality of groups of optical fibers, each group of fibers comprising fibers of essentially the same length, and wherein at least some of the group of fibers have differing optical lengths, at least some of the groups of fibers having differences in optical lengths therebetween which are at least equal to the sum of all of the optical length differences of the fibers in the first bundle.
- each of the groups may have essentially the same number of fibers, or alternatively and preferably, the number of fibers in each of the groups may increase according to the optical length of the group, and even more preferably, the number of fibers in each group may generally be proportional to the length of the group.
- the bundles may be arranged serially such that the beam for illumination of the object is initially incident on the first bundle or alternatively and preferably, the beam for illumination of the object is initially incident on the second bundle.
- an optical element is positioned between the bundles such that it is operative to direct illumination from any point of the output of the first bundle onto essentially each point of the input of the second bundle.
- the source of at least partially coherent illumination may preferably be a laser source, and the coherent illumination may have spatial coherence or temporal coherence or both.
- the plurality of optical fibers in the at least one fiber optics bundle are preferably randomly ordered.
- a diffusing element may be used for spatial mixing of the beam.
- a method of reducing the transmission loss in a fiber optical bundle for reducing the coherence of light transmitted therethrough, at least part of which light has a characteristic coherence length comprising the steps of providing at least one fiber optical bundle comprising a plurality of optical fibers, at least some of which have differing optical lengths, and arranging the lengths of the plurality of optical fibers such that at least some of the fibers of differing optical lengths have differences in optical length therebetween generally less than the characteristic coherence length.
- FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of a bright field object inspection system, utilizing a laser source and a fiber optical delivery bundle, constructed and operative according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention
- FIG. 2 is a schematic drawing of a fiber optical delivery bundle, according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, such as that used in FIG. 1 ;
- FIGS. 3A to 3E schematically show various preferred embodiments of fiber bundle applications, according to further preferred embodiments of the present invention.
- FIG. 3A is a graphical illustration of the transmission and the coherence reduction factor of a single fiber optical bundle, such as that shown in the embodiment of FIG. 1 , as a function of fiber optical length difference divided by the coherence length of the source;
- FIG. 3B is a schematic illustration of a double bundle fiber optical illumination system, according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
- FIGS. 3C and 3D respectively illustrate schematically two embodiments of a first bundle of a double bundle illumination system, such as that of FIG. 3B , according to another preferred embodiment of the present invention, in which the bundle is made up of groups of fibers of the same length;
- FIG. 3E is a schematic drawing of the second bundle of fibers of the preferred embodiment of FIG. 3B , in which each of the fibers is of a different optical length, the optical lengths preferably differing by the coherence length of the light source or less.
- FIG. 1 is an overall schematic side view of the complete illumination system of the defect detection apparatus, according to one preferred embodiment of the present invention.
- three alternative modes of illumination are provided: Bright Field (BF), Side-illuminated Dark Field (DF) and Orthogonal or Obscured Reflectance Dark Field (ODF).
- BF Bright Field
- DF Side-illuminated Dark Field
- ODF Orthogonal or Obscured Reflectance Dark Field
- Each mode of illumination is used to detect different types of defects in different production process steps. For example in order to detect an embedded defect in a transparent layer, such as silicon oxide, BF illumination is preferred. In order to detect a small particle on a surface, DF illumination generally yields better results.
- FIG. 1 shows a bright field illuminating laser source 300 delivering its output beam 15 into an optical delivery fiber bundle 21 , preferably by means of a laser to fiber coupler 150 .
- This optical fiber bundle 21 is required for the dual purposes of providing uniform illumination on the sample and for coherence breaking of the laser illumination, as will be expounded further hereinbelow.
- FIG. 1 only a single fiber bundle is used, but it is to be understood that a serial fiber bundle solution, as will be shown hereinbelow, could just as readily have been used.
- the laser beam is imaged by means of illumination transfer lenses 301 , 302 , onto the objective lens in use 201 , which is operative to focus the illumination onto the wafer plane 100 being inspected.
- Appropriate alternative objective lenses 201 ′ can be swung into place on an objective revolver 200 , as is known in the microscope arts.
- the illumination returned from the wafer is collected by the same objective lens 201 , and is deflected from the illumination path by means of a beam splitter 202 , towards a second beam splitter 500 , from where it is reflected through the imaging lens 203 , which images the light from the wafer onto the detector 206 .
- the second beam splitter 500 is used to separate the light going to the imaging functionality from the light used in the auto-focus functionality, which is directed by means of the auto-focus imaging lens 501 to the auto-focus detector 502 .
- a dark field side illumination source 231 is used to project the required illumination beam 221 onto the wafer 100 .
- an alternative dark field illumination source 230 is used to project the required illumination beam 232 via the obscured reflectance mirror 240 onto the wafer 100 orthogonally from above.
- a repetitively pulsed laser source is preferably used in the illumination system of the present invention, though according to other preferred embodiments, CW laser illumination may also be used.
- the third harmonic of a Nd:YAG Laser output is preferably used.
- Speckle effects with CW lasers is comparatively easy to overcome, since it is possible to average the signal while varying the wave front.
- Several methods are described in the prior art for achieving this. When, however, the imaging process utilizes a single pulse for each acquired image, such a method becomes impossible to implement.
- the laser beam is thus divided into many parts, each part having no defined phase coherence with the other parts.
- each point in the field of view (FOV) on the sample is illuminated by all parts of the laser beam.
- Each part of the beam is coherent or partially coherent with itself and thus may contribute to the generation of speckle, or to other interference effects that create high contrast artifacts in the image. Since each part of the beam is not coherent with the other parts of the beam, by ensuring that the FOV is illuminated by all parts of the laser beam, the total effect is averaged. The residual coherence effect depends on the number of beamlets used. Since each beamlet is independent of the others, the interference effect is reduced by the square root of the number of beamlets, assuming that all beamlets have the same intensity contribution. Consequently, the greater the number of beamlets, the lower the level of appearance of coherence artifacts in the image.
- the laser beam is introduced into a fiber optics bundle, such as the fiber bundle 21 shown schematically in FIG. 1 .
- the fibers in the bundle differ in length from each other by distances of the order of the laser coherence length in the fiber medium, or less.
- the number of fibers in the bundle dictates the contrast of the residual coherence effect in the image.
- the fiber bundle should preferably be illuminated uniformly. Each fiber in the bundle must carry more or less the same energy; otherwise averaging of the coherence effect will not be efficiently performed. Since the laser beam itself is not uniform and contains high and low spatial frequency components, the laser beam must be spatially mixed before introduction into the fiber.
- the full numerical aperture of the fiber should preferably be filled, since at the far end of the bundle, uniform angular distribution of intensity is required. These latter two requirements do not appear to be fulfilled in the prior art.
- Koehler illumination is generated, no arrangement is shown for spatially mixing the laser beam, nor is there described a specific method for ensuring that the incident light is directed such that the Numerical Aperture of each fiber is fully illuminated. Under the conditions shown, each fiber would illuminate randomly, resulting in non-uniform field stop plane intensity, which then would also result in non-uniform illumination at the object plane.
- the proposed array is made of N fiber-guides in which the length difference of any two fibers is greater than the coherence length of the light source.
- Such an arrangement would generally result in excessive differences, since it is the optical length difference and not the absolute length difference of any two fibers which needs to be greater than the coherence length of the light, according to the criteria chosen in the Dingel et al. article.
- the illumination system described in this prior art is for a transmissive imaging system.
- the laser beam 15 which can be either a parallel beam or slightly convergent, or slightly divergent impinges onto a diffusing element 16 , which, according to alternative and preferred embodiments, can be a regular diffuser, a holographic diffuser (such as an MEMS) or a micro-lens array having a numerical aperture that spreads the incident light at the required angles.
- the diffused beam shown schematically in FIG.
- a focussing element 18 which can be either a single lens, or, in order to reduce aberrations, a multi-element lens.
- Rays diffused at different angles from those rays 17 shown in FIG. 2 are imaged onto different points of the end face 20 of the fiber optics bundle 21 .
- Light from all of the included angles at which light is output from the diffuser is thus imaged by means of the focussing element 18 to cover the entire input aperture of the fiber bundle end face 20 .
- the beam traverses the fiber bundle 21 and is output at the opposite end face 29 of the fibers at the output connector 22 .
- the diffusing element 16 is preferably positioned at the left focal plane of the focussing element 18 , and the end face 20 of the fiber 21 , at the right focal plane of the focussing element.
- the half angle ⁇ of the diffusing element, and the focal length f, of focussing element are computed as follows:
- FIG. 3A is a graphical illustration of the outcome of the above-described trade-off in fiber length difference between transmission and coherence breaking efficiency.
- the results shown in FIG. 3A are for a bundle containing 40,000 fibers, and for a fiber having a transmission loss in the UV of the order of 0.1 db/m.
- the two ordinates separately show the bundle transmission and the coherence reduction factor as a function of Delta/L c , where each fiber differs in length by Delta mm, and the coherence length of the source is L c .
- the transmission is measured relative to a bundle having uniform fiber lengths equal to the length of the shortest fiber in the variable fiber length bundle.
- the value of L c for the example shown is 5 mm.
- the coherence reduction factor is approximately 90, compared to the maximum theoretical 200.
- the coherence reduction factor falls short of its theoretical value because the increasing insertion loss of each successive fiber means that the intensity contribution of each separate fiber to the total output is not equal, and the coherence breaking effect is thus reduced.
- the fiber optical length difference is reduced to only 0.4L c
- the coherence reduction factor is reduced to approximately 85, which is only a 6% reduction, while the transmission is increased to approximately 0.45, which is over a 110% increase.
- an illumination delivery fiber bundle operative for breaking the coherence of light transmitted therethrough, in which the differences in lengths of the fibers in the bundle are less than the coherence length of the source.
- FIG. 3B is a schematic illustration of an optical arrangement for achieving this result, wherein a second bundle is provided serially with the first bundle of FIG. 2 .
- a focussing element 24 which can be either a single lens, or a multi-element lens.
- the beam is output from the second fiber bundle 27 at the far end face 26 of the fibers at the output connector 28 .
- the diameter of the first bundle 21 be the same as the diameter of the second bundle 27 , as shown in the preferred embodiment of FIG. 3B . If the first bundle has a smaller diameter, a diffuser is required at its end to increase the angular distribution of light from the end, in order to fill the input of the second bundle.
- the fibers in both bundles are described as having different lengths, and the difference in length ⁇ L between any two fibers in one bundle is preferably selected to be greater than the coherence length of the light source.
- the difference in length between any pair in the other bundle is described as being preferably larger than the difference in length between the shortest and the longest fiber in the first mentioned bundle.
- the difference in length between any pair of fibers in the first bundle is described as being preferably larger than the difference in length between the shortest and the longest fiber in the other bundle.
- the difference in length between any pair of fibers of that other bundle is described as being greater than the coherence length of the light source, such that the difference in length between the shortest and the longest fiber in the other bundle is thus greater than the coherence length of the light source times the number of fibers in the other bundle.
- the typical coherence lengths generated by lasers used for such applications are of the order of up to a few millimeters. Consequently, according to the criteria of this prior art, there is an appreciable difference in length between the fibers of the first bundle.
- the differences between the lengths of the fibers in the second bundle should preferably be more than the coherence length in order to generate efficient coherence breaking in such a bundle, and on the other hand, the larger the difference in lengths between the fibers anywhere in the double bundle embodiment, the more the coherence breaking in the second fiber is degraded because of lack of unity of intensity.
- the difference in length ⁇ L between any two fibers in one bundle is preferably selected to be greater than the coherence length of the light source.
- This preferred difference in length is longer than the optical path length in the fiber by a factor N, where N is the refractive index of the core material, such that this method proposes use of a longer length difference between fibers than is dictated by optical considerations, even before any incentive to reduce fiber length differences, as discussed hereinabove.
- FIGS. 3C and 3D respectively illustrate schematically the two bundles of a double fiber bundle delivery system, constructed and operative according to another preferred embodiment of the present invention.
- This embodiment is operative to diminish the above-described disadvantages of the prior art double fiber bundle delivery system.
- the fiber bundle shown in FIG. 3C is regarded as the input bundle, denoted 21 in the embodiment of FIG. 3B
- the fiber bundle shown in FIG. 3D is regarded as the output bundle, denoted 27 in FIG. 3B , though it is to be understood that this embodiment is equally operable with the fibers in either order, if the correct matching components are provided.
- every fiber in order to generate good coherence breaking, every fiber should optimally be of a different optical length by the sum of all of the optical length differences of the fibers in the second bundle.
- equal optical length fibers should ideally be used, but this would generate no coherence breaking in the first bundle.
- the fibers within each group provide an element of uniformity to the beamlets output from the first bundle, while the difference in optical lengths between the groups provides the coherence breaking properties of the light from the different groups.
- the correct trade-off between these two effects is able to compensate to a large extent for the reduction in efficiency from the coherence breaking effect that would be obtained if all the fibers were of different optical lengths, but were also loss free, such that the intensity change effect was not a factor.
- the extent of the compensation between these two effects is a function of the attenuation per unit length of the fiber used.
- FIG. 3D is a schematic drawing of a bundle of fibers, according to yet another preferred embodiment of the present invention, similar to that shown in FIG. 3C , but in which the number of fibers in each group is increased according to the length of the group. Even more preferably, the number of fibers in each group is made generally proportional to the length of the group. In this way, the increased insertion loss arising in a group because of the additional fiber length in the group is offset by the increase in the number of fibers in that group.
- a further advantage in the use of groups of fibers, according to this embodiment of the present invention, is that the redundancy effect of a large number of fibers operating in parallel has the effect of smoothing out any production differences which inevitably arise between supposedly identical fibers, both in optical properties and in targeted cleaved length.
- each of the fibers is preferably of a different optical length, the optical lengths preferably differing by the coherence length of the light source or less. Since the total overall difference in optical lengths of the fibers in the second bundle is determinative in fixing the difference in the optical lengths between the different groups of fibers in the first bundle, and as mentioned above, there is an advantage in keeping the path differences between fibers as short as possible to minimize intensity changes between fibers or fiber groups, there is an additional advantage to the first bundle parameters if the optical lengths of the fibers in the second bundle differ by as little as possible.
- a system comprising only one bundle of the type containing the groups of fibers, whether that bundle is positioned in front of or after the bundle containing the single fibers.
- a plurality of bundles with groups of fibers can be used, instead of a single such bundle, such that the illumination system comprises a series of bundles of fibers, with the groups of fibers and the fibers respectively optimally arranged for good coherence breaking properties and minimal transmission losses, as expounded hereinabove.
- FIGS. 3C to 3E Some examples are now provided to illustrate one preferred embodiment of FIGS. 3C to 3E quantitatively.
- the length of a first fiber is L, where L is preferably of the order of 1 meter.
- a second fiber is longer than the first by L c /N, where L c is the coherence length of the laser source, typically 6 mm, and N is the fiber core refractive index, generally of the order of 1.5, such that the fiber length difference is of the order of 4 mm.
- a third fiber is longer than the second also by L c /N, and so on. The sum of all k length differences is thus k ⁇ L c /N, which amounts to the order of 4 meters for this preferred example.
- the first bundle has a number n of groups of fibers, where n is preferably 10 to 20.
- Each group contains m, preferably 20 to 50, fibers of equal length and equal optical path length.
- the length difference between each of the groups is equal to or greater than the sum of all of the length differences of the second bundle, which, in this preferred example, amounts to approximately 4 meters, as obtained above. From these numerical examples, the reason for limiting differences in fiber lengths to limit transmission loss changes, becomes evident.
- Such short laser pulses which can typically be as short as only a few nanoseconds, may have a peak power density so high that the focussed beam may cause damage to the wafer under inspection.
- a common method used to decrease the peak power of a short laser pulse is to stretch the pulse, such that the pulse energy is expended over a longer time, and hence has a lower peak power.
- Such pulse stretching can be performed by transmitting the pulse in parallel down several paths of different optical path length, and recombining after transit. This is the situation which exists with the assembly of variable length fibers in the bundles shown in the embodiments of FIGS. 2 and 3 A- 3 E of the present invention, such that the fiber bundles of the present invention are also effective in pulse stretching applications.
- the above mentioned numerical example will be used.
- a total length difference of 80 meters is generated.
- the time of flight of light in the medium of the fiber, having a refractive index of 1.5, is approximately 5 nsec/meter.
- the total time of flight difference for an 80 meter bundle is approximately 400 nsec.
- the effect of the bundle is thus to generate pulse stretching from the typically few nanosecond pulse lengths emitted by the laser, to about two orders of magnitude longer, with the concomitant reduction in potential beam damage.
- some or all of the optical path differences between fibers is less than the beam coherence length.
- a particular feature of a preferred embodiment of the present invention is that the system includes a second fiber optic bundle, within which the optical path length difference between each pair of fibers is less than or equal to the coherence length of the light beam being employed by the system.
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
- Biochemistry (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Immunology (AREA)
- Pathology (AREA)
- Optical Fibers, Optical Fiber Cores, And Optical Fiber Bundles (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- (i) Interference of light in the illumination optics creates non-uniformity in the illumination field.
- (ii) Interference of the illuminated light by the structured pattern on the wafer creates artifacts in the image.
- (iii) Surface roughness creates speckle, that generates non-uniformity in the image.
- (iv) The laser beam itself is generally not uniform. Using the laser beam directly as a light source creates non-uniform illumination.
- (a) Spatial coherence, which is the phase relation between each spatial point in the laser beam spot. This allows different points in the spot to interact with each other in a destructive or constructive manner when the spot is illuminating a cyclic pattern or a rough surface. This quality depends mainly on the mode of the beam. For instance in the basic mode (TEM00) the spatial coherence is defined by the Gaussian profile of the beam.
- (b) Temporal coherence, which is a measure of the time or the transit distance (the time multiplied by the speed of light in the medium concerned) over which the phase of the beam can be defined. This parameter depends on the type of laser and its spectral bandwidth. Thus, for instance, for the second harmonic of a Nd:YAG laser at 532 nm, the coherence length is about 8 mm in free space.
- (i) Firstly, because of the transmission loses in typically used fiber materials, the light intensity output from each fiber of the bundle may be significantly different, falling with increasing fiber length. However, for the coherence breaking effect to be effective, there should ideally be only phase or time of flight differences between the various fiber outputs, and any differences in intensity contribution degrades the desired coherence breaking effect.
- (ii) Secondly, the longer these differences in length, the longer the overall length of the bundle, and the longer the overall length of the bundle, the higher the transmission losses themselves, quite apart from their effect on the coherence breaking effects. These transmission losses make the illumination system inefficient and less cost-effective.
Claims (17)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/709,019 US7486861B2 (en) | 2003-01-15 | 2007-02-21 | Fiber optical illumination system |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/345,096 US6892013B2 (en) | 2003-01-15 | 2003-01-15 | Fiber optical illumination system |
US11/096,873 US7260298B2 (en) | 2003-01-15 | 2005-04-01 | Fiber optical illumination system |
US11/709,019 US7486861B2 (en) | 2003-01-15 | 2007-02-21 | Fiber optical illumination system |
Related Parent Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/096,873 Continuation-In-Part US7260298B2 (en) | 2003-01-15 | 2005-04-01 | Fiber optical illumination system |
US11/096,873 Continuation US7260298B2 (en) | 2003-01-15 | 2005-04-01 | Fiber optical illumination system |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20070146694A1 US20070146694A1 (en) | 2007-06-28 |
US7486861B2 true US7486861B2 (en) | 2009-02-03 |
Family
ID=38193260
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/709,019 Expired - Lifetime US7486861B2 (en) | 2003-01-15 | 2007-02-21 | Fiber optical illumination system |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US7486861B2 (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8456622B1 (en) * | 2010-09-28 | 2013-06-04 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Spatial and temporal coherence measurement system |
Families Citing this family (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8251784B2 (en) * | 2008-06-09 | 2012-08-28 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method to route airflow through dynamically changing ducts |
JP5295160B2 (en) * | 2010-03-30 | 2013-09-18 | 株式会社日立ハイテクノロジーズ | Surface inspection apparatus and surface inspection method |
CN111707613B (en) * | 2020-04-10 | 2021-02-02 | 杭州博日科技股份有限公司 | Optical fiber mounting seat, PCR optical module and PCR instrument |
JP2023541449A (en) * | 2020-09-14 | 2023-10-02 | シンギュラー・ゲノミクス・システムズ・インコーポレイテッド | Methods and systems for multidimensional imaging |
Citations (90)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3598467A (en) | 1969-03-28 | 1971-08-10 | Trw Inc | Er optic diffuser for holography |
US4011403A (en) | 1976-03-30 | 1977-03-08 | Northwestern University | Fiber optic laser illuminators |
US4247203A (en) | 1978-04-03 | 1981-01-27 | Kla Instrument Corporation | Automatic photomask inspection system and apparatus |
US4347001A (en) | 1978-04-03 | 1982-08-31 | Kla Instruments Corporation | Automatic photomask inspection system and apparatus |
US4360372A (en) | 1980-11-10 | 1982-11-23 | Northern Telecom Limited | Fiber optic element for reducing speckle noise |
US4378159A (en) | 1981-03-30 | 1983-03-29 | Tencor Instruments | Scanning contaminant and defect detector |
US4462662A (en) | 1981-06-15 | 1984-07-31 | Xerox Corporation | Imaging system utilizing a gradient index lens array compensated for non-uniform object illumination |
US4556317A (en) | 1984-02-22 | 1985-12-03 | Kla Instruments Corporation | X-Y Stage for a patterned wafer automatic inspection system |
US4579455A (en) | 1983-05-09 | 1986-04-01 | Kla Instruments Corporation | Photomask inspection apparatus and method with improved defect detection |
US4589736A (en) | 1984-11-23 | 1986-05-20 | Xerox Corporation | Two row reduction/enlargement gradient index lens array having square-ended fibers |
US4597665A (en) | 1983-12-09 | 1986-07-01 | Tencor Instruments | Dual collector optical flaw detector |
US4618938A (en) | 1984-02-22 | 1986-10-21 | Kla Instruments Corporation | Method and apparatus for automatic wafer inspection |
US4639587A (en) | 1984-02-22 | 1987-01-27 | Kla Instruments Corporation | Automatic focusing system for a microscope |
US4644172A (en) | 1984-02-22 | 1987-02-17 | Kla Instruments Corporation | Electronic control of an automatic wafer inspection system |
US4734923A (en) | 1986-05-19 | 1988-03-29 | Hampshire Instruments, Inc | Lithographic system mask inspection device |
US4760265A (en) | 1986-01-18 | 1988-07-26 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toyoda Jidoshokki Seisakusho | Method and device for detecting defects of patterns in microelectronic devices |
US4766324A (en) | 1987-08-07 | 1988-08-23 | Tencor Instruments | Particle detection method including comparison between sequential scans |
US4845558A (en) | 1987-12-03 | 1989-07-04 | Kla Instruments Corporation | Method and apparatus for detecting defects in repeated microminiature patterns |
US4877326A (en) | 1988-02-19 | 1989-10-31 | Kla Instruments Corporation | Method and apparatus for optical inspection of substrates |
US4898471A (en) | 1987-06-18 | 1990-02-06 | Tencor Instruments | Particle detection on patterned wafers and the like |
US4967095A (en) | 1989-06-28 | 1990-10-30 | Tencor Instruments | Method and apparatus for detecting and sizing particles on surfaces |
US4969198A (en) | 1986-04-17 | 1990-11-06 | International Business Machines Corporation | System for automatic inspection of periodic patterns |
US5008743A (en) | 1988-03-24 | 1991-04-16 | Orbot Systems Ltd. | Telecentric imaging system optical inspection machine using the same and method for correcting optical distortion produced thereby |
US5029975A (en) | 1990-01-24 | 1991-07-09 | The Mitre Corporation | Despeckling screen utilizing optical fibers and method of reducing interference using same |
US5056765A (en) | 1989-06-06 | 1991-10-15 | Orbot Systems, Ltd. | Immobilizing device particularly useful during processing or testing flat workpieces |
US5058982A (en) | 1989-06-21 | 1991-10-22 | Orbot Systems Ltd. | Illumination system and inspection apparatus including same |
US5076692A (en) | 1990-05-31 | 1991-12-31 | Tencor Instruments | Particle detection on a patterned or bare wafer surface |
US5112129A (en) | 1990-03-02 | 1992-05-12 | Kla Instruments Corporation | Method of image enhancement for the coherence probe microscope with applications to integrated circuit metrology |
US5153668A (en) | 1990-05-11 | 1992-10-06 | Orbot Systems Ltd. | Optical inspection apparatus and illumination system particularly useful therein |
US5194959A (en) | 1989-12-21 | 1993-03-16 | Ricoh Company, Ltd. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation | Image forming apparatus for forming image corresponding to subject, by dividing optical image corresponding to the subject into plural adjacent optical image parts |
JPH05190421A (en) | 1992-01-17 | 1993-07-30 | Canon Inc | Alignment method of substrate |
US5264912A (en) | 1992-02-07 | 1993-11-23 | Tencor Instruments | Speckle reduction track filter apparatus for optical inspection of patterned substrates |
US5267017A (en) | 1992-05-20 | 1993-11-30 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Method of particle analysis on a mirror wafer |
US5302999A (en) * | 1992-02-04 | 1994-04-12 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Illumination method, illumination apparatus and projection exposure apparatus |
US5381004A (en) | 1993-08-31 | 1995-01-10 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Particle analysis of notched wafers |
US5422724A (en) | 1992-05-20 | 1995-06-06 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Multiple-scan method for wafer particle analysis |
JPH08154210A (en) | 1994-11-28 | 1996-06-11 | Kubota Corp | Image pickup device |
US5537669A (en) | 1993-09-30 | 1996-07-16 | Kla Instruments Corporation | Inspection method and apparatus for the inspection of either random or repeating patterns |
JPH08292361A (en) | 1995-04-24 | 1996-11-05 | Olympus Optical Co Ltd | Prism fixing device |
US5586058A (en) | 1990-12-04 | 1996-12-17 | Orbot Instruments Ltd. | Apparatus and method for inspection of a patterned object by comparison thereof to a reference |
US5604585A (en) | 1995-03-31 | 1997-02-18 | Tencor Instruments | Particle detection system employing a subsystem for collecting scattered light from the particles |
US5608155A (en) | 1993-04-30 | 1997-03-04 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Method and apparatus for detecting particles on a substrate |
US5619588A (en) | 1992-07-27 | 1997-04-08 | Orbot Instruments Ltd. | Apparatus and method for comparing and aligning two digital representations of an image |
US5619429A (en) | 1990-12-04 | 1997-04-08 | Orbot Instruments Ltd. | Apparatus and method for inspection of a patterned object by comparison thereof to a reference |
US5659172A (en) | 1995-06-21 | 1997-08-19 | Opal Technologies Ltd. | Reliable defect detection using multiple perspective scanning electron microscope images |
US5699447A (en) | 1990-11-16 | 1997-12-16 | Orbot Instruments Ltd. | Two-phase optical inspection method and apparatus for defect detection |
US5797317A (en) | 1996-09-06 | 1998-08-25 | Orbot Instruments Ltd. | Universal chuck for holding plates of various sizes |
US5798829A (en) | 1996-03-05 | 1998-08-25 | Kla-Tencor Corporation | Single laser bright field and dark field system for detecting anomalies of a sample |
US5822055A (en) | 1995-06-06 | 1998-10-13 | Kla Instruments Corporation | Optical inspection of a specimen using multi-channel responses from the specimen using bright and darkfield detection |
US5825482A (en) | 1995-09-29 | 1998-10-20 | Kla-Tencor Corporation | Surface inspection system with misregistration error correction and adaptive illumination |
JPH1114357A (en) | 1997-06-20 | 1999-01-22 | Technical Syst:Kk | Automatic tracking device of surveying equipment |
US5864394A (en) | 1994-06-20 | 1999-01-26 | Kla-Tencor Corporation | Surface inspection system |
US5883710A (en) | 1994-12-08 | 1999-03-16 | Kla-Tencor Corporation | Scanning system for inspecting anomalies on surfaces |
US5892579A (en) | 1996-07-16 | 1999-04-06 | Orbot Instruments Ltd. | Optical inspection method and apparatus |
US5912735A (en) | 1997-07-29 | 1999-06-15 | Kla-Tencor Corporation | Laser/white light viewing laser imaging system |
US5917588A (en) | 1996-11-04 | 1999-06-29 | Kla-Tencor Corporation | Automated specimen inspection system for and method of distinguishing features or anomalies under either bright field or dark field illumination |
US5939647A (en) | 1996-01-16 | 1999-08-17 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Surface particle sampling head having a rotatable probe |
US5970168A (en) | 1997-08-05 | 1999-10-19 | Kla-Tencor Corporation | Fourier filtering mechanism for inspecting wafers |
US5991699A (en) | 1995-05-04 | 1999-11-23 | Kla Instruments Corporation | Detecting groups of defects in semiconductor feature space |
EP0959378A1 (en) | 1998-05-20 | 1999-11-24 | Sony Corporation | Optical coherence reduction method and device, illuminating method and system |
US6020957A (en) | 1998-04-30 | 2000-02-01 | Kla-Tencor Corporation | System and method for inspecting semiconductor wafers |
US6064517A (en) | 1996-07-22 | 2000-05-16 | Kla-Tencor Corporation | High NA system for multiple mode imaging |
US6075375A (en) | 1997-06-11 | 2000-06-13 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Apparatus for wafer detection |
US6099596A (en) | 1997-07-23 | 2000-08-08 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Wafer out-of-pocket detection tool |
US6122046A (en) | 1998-10-02 | 2000-09-19 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Dual resolution combined laser spot scanning and area imaging inspection |
US6124924A (en) | 1998-12-24 | 2000-09-26 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Focus error correction method and apparatus |
WO2000070332A1 (en) | 1999-05-18 | 2000-11-23 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Method of and apparatus for inspection of articles by comparison with a master |
US6169282B1 (en) | 1997-10-29 | 2001-01-02 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Defect inspection method and apparatus therefor |
US6172349B1 (en) | 1997-03-31 | 2001-01-09 | Kla-Tencor Corporation | Autofocusing apparatus and method for high resolution microscope system |
US6175645B1 (en) | 1998-01-22 | 2001-01-16 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Optical inspection method and apparatus |
US6175646B1 (en) | 1997-09-04 | 2001-01-16 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Apparatus for detecting defective integrated circuit dies in wafer form |
US6208750B1 (en) | 1998-07-07 | 2001-03-27 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Method for detecting particles using illumination with several wavelengths |
US6208411B1 (en) | 1998-09-28 | 2001-03-27 | Kla-Tencor Corporation | Massively parallel inspection and imaging system |
US6236454B1 (en) | 1997-12-15 | 2001-05-22 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Multiple beam scanner for an inspection system |
US6246822B1 (en) | 1999-05-18 | 2001-06-12 | The Boeing Company | Fiber-coupled receiver and associated method |
US6256093B1 (en) | 1998-06-25 | 2001-07-03 | Applied Materials, Inc. | On-the-fly automatic defect classification for substrates using signal attributes |
US6268916B1 (en) | 1999-05-11 | 2001-07-31 | Kla-Tencor Corporation | System for non-destructive measurement of samples |
US6267005B1 (en) | 1994-12-22 | 2001-07-31 | Kla-Tencor Corporation | Dual stage instrument for scanning a specimen |
US6268093B1 (en) | 1999-10-13 | 2001-07-31 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Method for reticle inspection using aerial imaging |
US6271916B1 (en) | 1994-03-24 | 2001-08-07 | Kla-Tencor Corporation | Process and assembly for non-destructive surface inspections |
US6288780B1 (en) | 1995-06-06 | 2001-09-11 | Kla-Tencor Technologies Corp. | High throughput brightfield/darkfield wafer inspection system using advanced optical techniques |
US6317514B1 (en) | 1998-09-09 | 2001-11-13 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Method and apparatus for inspection of patterned semiconductor wafers |
US6347173B1 (en) | 1998-05-15 | 2002-02-12 | Sony Corporation | Optical coherence reduction method and its device, illuminating method and its system and optical fiber bundle |
US6361910B1 (en) | 2000-02-03 | 2002-03-26 | Applied Materials, Inc | Straight line defect detection |
US6369888B1 (en) | 1999-11-17 | 2002-04-09 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Method and apparatus for article inspection including speckle reduction |
US6456769B1 (en) | 1999-09-02 | 2002-09-24 | Asahi Kogaku Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Fiber bundle and endoscope apparatus |
US6628681B2 (en) | 2001-03-16 | 2003-09-30 | Sony Corporation | Laser apparatus |
US20040146295A1 (en) * | 2003-01-15 | 2004-07-29 | Negevtech Ltd. | System for detection of wafer defects |
US6892013B2 (en) | 2003-01-15 | 2005-05-10 | Negevtech Ltd. | Fiber optical illumination system |
US6895149B1 (en) | 2002-05-13 | 2005-05-17 | James Jeffery Jacob | Apparatus for beam homogenization and speckle reduction |
-
2007
- 2007-02-21 US US11/709,019 patent/US7486861B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Patent Citations (100)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3598467A (en) | 1969-03-28 | 1971-08-10 | Trw Inc | Er optic diffuser for holography |
US4011403A (en) | 1976-03-30 | 1977-03-08 | Northwestern University | Fiber optic laser illuminators |
US4247203A (en) | 1978-04-03 | 1981-01-27 | Kla Instrument Corporation | Automatic photomask inspection system and apparatus |
US4347001A (en) | 1978-04-03 | 1982-08-31 | Kla Instruments Corporation | Automatic photomask inspection system and apparatus |
US4360372A (en) | 1980-11-10 | 1982-11-23 | Northern Telecom Limited | Fiber optic element for reducing speckle noise |
US4378159A (en) | 1981-03-30 | 1983-03-29 | Tencor Instruments | Scanning contaminant and defect detector |
US4462662A (en) | 1981-06-15 | 1984-07-31 | Xerox Corporation | Imaging system utilizing a gradient index lens array compensated for non-uniform object illumination |
US4579455A (en) | 1983-05-09 | 1986-04-01 | Kla Instruments Corporation | Photomask inspection apparatus and method with improved defect detection |
US4597665A (en) | 1983-12-09 | 1986-07-01 | Tencor Instruments | Dual collector optical flaw detector |
US4601576A (en) | 1983-12-09 | 1986-07-22 | Tencor Instruments | Light collector for optical contaminant and flaw detector |
US4644172A (en) | 1984-02-22 | 1987-02-17 | Kla Instruments Corporation | Electronic control of an automatic wafer inspection system |
US4618938A (en) | 1984-02-22 | 1986-10-21 | Kla Instruments Corporation | Method and apparatus for automatic wafer inspection |
US4639587A (en) | 1984-02-22 | 1987-01-27 | Kla Instruments Corporation | Automatic focusing system for a microscope |
US4556317A (en) | 1984-02-22 | 1985-12-03 | Kla Instruments Corporation | X-Y Stage for a patterned wafer automatic inspection system |
US4589736A (en) | 1984-11-23 | 1986-05-20 | Xerox Corporation | Two row reduction/enlargement gradient index lens array having square-ended fibers |
US4760265A (en) | 1986-01-18 | 1988-07-26 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toyoda Jidoshokki Seisakusho | Method and device for detecting defects of patterns in microelectronic devices |
US4969198A (en) | 1986-04-17 | 1990-11-06 | International Business Machines Corporation | System for automatic inspection of periodic patterns |
US4734923A (en) | 1986-05-19 | 1988-03-29 | Hampshire Instruments, Inc | Lithographic system mask inspection device |
US4898471A (en) | 1987-06-18 | 1990-02-06 | Tencor Instruments | Particle detection on patterned wafers and the like |
US4766324A (en) | 1987-08-07 | 1988-08-23 | Tencor Instruments | Particle detection method including comparison between sequential scans |
US4845558A (en) | 1987-12-03 | 1989-07-04 | Kla Instruments Corporation | Method and apparatus for detecting defects in repeated microminiature patterns |
US4877326A (en) | 1988-02-19 | 1989-10-31 | Kla Instruments Corporation | Method and apparatus for optical inspection of substrates |
US5008743A (en) | 1988-03-24 | 1991-04-16 | Orbot Systems Ltd. | Telecentric imaging system optical inspection machine using the same and method for correcting optical distortion produced thereby |
US5056765A (en) | 1989-06-06 | 1991-10-15 | Orbot Systems, Ltd. | Immobilizing device particularly useful during processing or testing flat workpieces |
US5058982A (en) | 1989-06-21 | 1991-10-22 | Orbot Systems Ltd. | Illumination system and inspection apparatus including same |
US4967095A (en) | 1989-06-28 | 1990-10-30 | Tencor Instruments | Method and apparatus for detecting and sizing particles on surfaces |
US5194959A (en) | 1989-12-21 | 1993-03-16 | Ricoh Company, Ltd. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation | Image forming apparatus for forming image corresponding to subject, by dividing optical image corresponding to the subject into plural adjacent optical image parts |
US5029975A (en) | 1990-01-24 | 1991-07-09 | The Mitre Corporation | Despeckling screen utilizing optical fibers and method of reducing interference using same |
US5112129A (en) | 1990-03-02 | 1992-05-12 | Kla Instruments Corporation | Method of image enhancement for the coherence probe microscope with applications to integrated circuit metrology |
US5153668A (en) | 1990-05-11 | 1992-10-06 | Orbot Systems Ltd. | Optical inspection apparatus and illumination system particularly useful therein |
US5076692A (en) | 1990-05-31 | 1991-12-31 | Tencor Instruments | Particle detection on a patterned or bare wafer surface |
US5982921A (en) | 1990-11-16 | 1999-11-09 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Optical inspection method and apparatus |
US5699447A (en) | 1990-11-16 | 1997-12-16 | Orbot Instruments Ltd. | Two-phase optical inspection method and apparatus for defect detection |
US6178257B1 (en) | 1990-11-16 | 2001-01-23 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Substrate inspection method and apparatus |
US5586058A (en) | 1990-12-04 | 1996-12-17 | Orbot Instruments Ltd. | Apparatus and method for inspection of a patterned object by comparison thereof to a reference |
US6360005B1 (en) | 1990-12-04 | 2002-03-19 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Apparatus and method for microscopic inspection of articles |
US5619429A (en) | 1990-12-04 | 1997-04-08 | Orbot Instruments Ltd. | Apparatus and method for inspection of a patterned object by comparison thereof to a reference |
JPH05190421A (en) | 1992-01-17 | 1993-07-30 | Canon Inc | Alignment method of substrate |
US5302999A (en) * | 1992-02-04 | 1994-04-12 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Illumination method, illumination apparatus and projection exposure apparatus |
US5264912A (en) | 1992-02-07 | 1993-11-23 | Tencor Instruments | Speckle reduction track filter apparatus for optical inspection of patterned substrates |
US5422724A (en) | 1992-05-20 | 1995-06-06 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Multiple-scan method for wafer particle analysis |
US5267017A (en) | 1992-05-20 | 1993-11-30 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Method of particle analysis on a mirror wafer |
US5907628A (en) | 1992-07-27 | 1999-05-25 | Orbot Instruments Ltd. | Apparatus and method for comparing and aligning two digital representations of an image |
US5619588A (en) | 1992-07-27 | 1997-04-08 | Orbot Instruments Ltd. | Apparatus and method for comparing and aligning two digital representations of an image |
US5608155A (en) | 1993-04-30 | 1997-03-04 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Method and apparatus for detecting particles on a substrate |
US5381004A (en) | 1993-08-31 | 1995-01-10 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Particle analysis of notched wafers |
US6021214A (en) | 1993-09-30 | 2000-02-01 | Kla Instruments Corp. | Inspection method and apparatus for the inspection of either random or repeating patterns |
US5537669A (en) | 1993-09-30 | 1996-07-16 | Kla Instruments Corporation | Inspection method and apparatus for the inspection of either random or repeating patterns |
US6271916B1 (en) | 1994-03-24 | 2001-08-07 | Kla-Tencor Corporation | Process and assembly for non-destructive surface inspections |
US5864394A (en) | 1994-06-20 | 1999-01-26 | Kla-Tencor Corporation | Surface inspection system |
JPH08154210A (en) | 1994-11-28 | 1996-06-11 | Kubota Corp | Image pickup device |
US5883710A (en) | 1994-12-08 | 1999-03-16 | Kla-Tencor Corporation | Scanning system for inspecting anomalies on surfaces |
US6215551B1 (en) | 1994-12-08 | 2001-04-10 | Kla-Tencor Corporation | Scanning system for inspecting anomalies on surfaces |
US6267005B1 (en) | 1994-12-22 | 2001-07-31 | Kla-Tencor Corporation | Dual stage instrument for scanning a specimen |
US5604585A (en) | 1995-03-31 | 1997-02-18 | Tencor Instruments | Particle detection system employing a subsystem for collecting scattered light from the particles |
JPH08292361A (en) | 1995-04-24 | 1996-11-05 | Olympus Optical Co Ltd | Prism fixing device |
US5991699A (en) | 1995-05-04 | 1999-11-23 | Kla Instruments Corporation | Detecting groups of defects in semiconductor feature space |
US5822055A (en) | 1995-06-06 | 1998-10-13 | Kla Instruments Corporation | Optical inspection of a specimen using multi-channel responses from the specimen using bright and darkfield detection |
US6288780B1 (en) | 1995-06-06 | 2001-09-11 | Kla-Tencor Technologies Corp. | High throughput brightfield/darkfield wafer inspection system using advanced optical techniques |
US6078386A (en) | 1995-06-06 | 2000-06-20 | Kla Instruments Corporation | Inspection system simultaneously utilizing monochromatic darkfield and broadband brightfield illumination sources |
US5659172A (en) | 1995-06-21 | 1997-08-19 | Opal Technologies Ltd. | Reliable defect detection using multiple perspective scanning electron microscope images |
US5825482A (en) | 1995-09-29 | 1998-10-20 | Kla-Tencor Corporation | Surface inspection system with misregistration error correction and adaptive illumination |
US5939647A (en) | 1996-01-16 | 1999-08-17 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Surface particle sampling head having a rotatable probe |
US5798829A (en) | 1996-03-05 | 1998-08-25 | Kla-Tencor Corporation | Single laser bright field and dark field system for detecting anomalies of a sample |
US5892579A (en) | 1996-07-16 | 1999-04-06 | Orbot Instruments Ltd. | Optical inspection method and apparatus |
US6064517A (en) | 1996-07-22 | 2000-05-16 | Kla-Tencor Corporation | High NA system for multiple mode imaging |
US5797317A (en) | 1996-09-06 | 1998-08-25 | Orbot Instruments Ltd. | Universal chuck for holding plates of various sizes |
US5917588A (en) | 1996-11-04 | 1999-06-29 | Kla-Tencor Corporation | Automated specimen inspection system for and method of distinguishing features or anomalies under either bright field or dark field illumination |
US6172349B1 (en) | 1997-03-31 | 2001-01-09 | Kla-Tencor Corporation | Autofocusing apparatus and method for high resolution microscope system |
US6075375A (en) | 1997-06-11 | 2000-06-13 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Apparatus for wafer detection |
JPH1114357A (en) | 1997-06-20 | 1999-01-22 | Technical Syst:Kk | Automatic tracking device of surveying equipment |
US6099596A (en) | 1997-07-23 | 2000-08-08 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Wafer out-of-pocket detection tool |
US6274878B1 (en) | 1997-07-23 | 2001-08-14 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Wafer out-of-pocket detection method |
US5912735A (en) | 1997-07-29 | 1999-06-15 | Kla-Tencor Corporation | Laser/white light viewing laser imaging system |
US5970168A (en) | 1997-08-05 | 1999-10-19 | Kla-Tencor Corporation | Fourier filtering mechanism for inspecting wafers |
US6175646B1 (en) | 1997-09-04 | 2001-01-16 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Apparatus for detecting defective integrated circuit dies in wafer form |
US6169282B1 (en) | 1997-10-29 | 2001-01-02 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Defect inspection method and apparatus therefor |
US6236454B1 (en) | 1997-12-15 | 2001-05-22 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Multiple beam scanner for an inspection system |
US6175645B1 (en) | 1998-01-22 | 2001-01-16 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Optical inspection method and apparatus |
US6020957A (en) | 1998-04-30 | 2000-02-01 | Kla-Tencor Corporation | System and method for inspecting semiconductor wafers |
US6347173B1 (en) | 1998-05-15 | 2002-02-12 | Sony Corporation | Optical coherence reduction method and its device, illuminating method and its system and optical fiber bundle |
EP0959378A1 (en) | 1998-05-20 | 1999-11-24 | Sony Corporation | Optical coherence reduction method and device, illuminating method and system |
US6256093B1 (en) | 1998-06-25 | 2001-07-03 | Applied Materials, Inc. | On-the-fly automatic defect classification for substrates using signal attributes |
US6208750B1 (en) | 1998-07-07 | 2001-03-27 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Method for detecting particles using illumination with several wavelengths |
US6317514B1 (en) | 1998-09-09 | 2001-11-13 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Method and apparatus for inspection of patterned semiconductor wafers |
US6208411B1 (en) | 1998-09-28 | 2001-03-27 | Kla-Tencor Corporation | Massively parallel inspection and imaging system |
US6122046A (en) | 1998-10-02 | 2000-09-19 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Dual resolution combined laser spot scanning and area imaging inspection |
US6124924A (en) | 1998-12-24 | 2000-09-26 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Focus error correction method and apparatus |
US6268916B1 (en) | 1999-05-11 | 2001-07-31 | Kla-Tencor Corporation | System for non-destructive measurement of samples |
US6246822B1 (en) | 1999-05-18 | 2001-06-12 | The Boeing Company | Fiber-coupled receiver and associated method |
WO2000070332A1 (en) | 1999-05-18 | 2000-11-23 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Method of and apparatus for inspection of articles by comparison with a master |
US6456769B1 (en) | 1999-09-02 | 2002-09-24 | Asahi Kogaku Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Fiber bundle and endoscope apparatus |
US6268093B1 (en) | 1999-10-13 | 2001-07-31 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Method for reticle inspection using aerial imaging |
US6369888B1 (en) | 1999-11-17 | 2002-04-09 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Method and apparatus for article inspection including speckle reduction |
US20020067478A1 (en) | 1999-11-17 | 2002-06-06 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Method of and apparatus for article inspection including speckle reduction |
US6361910B1 (en) | 2000-02-03 | 2002-03-26 | Applied Materials, Inc | Straight line defect detection |
US6628681B2 (en) | 2001-03-16 | 2003-09-30 | Sony Corporation | Laser apparatus |
US6895149B1 (en) | 2002-05-13 | 2005-05-17 | James Jeffery Jacob | Apparatus for beam homogenization and speckle reduction |
US20040146295A1 (en) * | 2003-01-15 | 2004-07-29 | Negevtech Ltd. | System for detection of wafer defects |
US6892013B2 (en) | 2003-01-15 | 2005-05-10 | Negevtech Ltd. | Fiber optical illumination system |
Non-Patent Citations (8)
Title |
---|
Dingel, et al., "Speckle Reduction with Virtual Incoherent Laser Illumination Using Modified Fiber Array" Optik (1993) vol. 94, No. 3, pp. 132-136. |
Dom, B.E., et al. "Machine Vision and Applications" IBM Scientists (1998) vol. 1, pp. 205-221. |
Kohler, D., et al. "Speckle Reduction in Pulsed-Laser Photography" Optics Communications (1974) vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 24-28. |
McKecknie, T.S. "Speckle Reduction" Topics in Applied Physics (1984) vol. 9, pp. 123-170. |
Patent Abstracts of Japan of JP 05 190421 dated Jul. 30, 1993. |
Patent Abstracts of Japan of JP 08 154210 dated Jun. 11, 1996. |
Patent Abstracts of Japan of JP 08 292361 dated Nov. 5, 1996. |
Patent Abstracts of Japan of JP 11 014357 dated Jan. 22, 1999. |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8456622B1 (en) * | 2010-09-28 | 2013-06-04 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Spatial and temporal coherence measurement system |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US20070146694A1 (en) | 2007-06-28 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US6892013B2 (en) | Fiber optical illumination system | |
US6429931B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for article inspection including speckle reduction | |
US20080037933A1 (en) | Speckle reduction using a fiber bundle and light guide | |
US6895149B1 (en) | Apparatus for beam homogenization and speckle reduction | |
Kumar et al. | Speckle noise reduction strategies in laser-based projection imaging, fluorescence microscopy, and digital holography with uniform illumination, improved image sharpness, and resolution | |
JP4149761B2 (en) | Multiphoton endoscopy | |
JP5254205B2 (en) | Optical scanning device and two-dimensional image display device using the same | |
US7486861B2 (en) | Fiber optical illumination system | |
JP7606288B2 (en) | Chromatic confocal measurement device | |
TW202104856A (en) | High-brightness illumination source for optical metrology | |
JP4922503B2 (en) | Coordinate measuring instrument | |
US6698907B1 (en) | Method and device for coupling light sources to a light guide | |
JP2020529628A (en) | Spectroscopic filter for high power fiber illumination sources | |
JPH11101925A (en) | Laser illuminator | |
WO2022049986A1 (en) | Pulse spectroscopy device and multi-fiber radiation unit | |
TWI623784B (en) | Solid state illumination source and inspection system | |
Robinson et al. | Design and optimization of a flexible high-peak-power laser-to-fiber coupled illumination system used in digital particle image velocimetry | |
KR101978663B1 (en) | Reflecting structure of lighting optics | |
CN114460738A (en) | System for generating z-axis multifocal lens under objective lens and compensating spherical aberration and implementation method thereof | |
JP5343442B2 (en) | Laser beam shaping device | |
KR100712484B1 (en) | Exposure device | |
JPH0298350A (en) | Semiconductor laser treatment device |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: KREOS CAPITAL II LIMITED Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:NEGEVTECH LTD.;REEL/FRAME:021109/0971 Effective date: 20080330 Owner name: PLENUS II, L.P., ISRAEL Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:NEGEVTECH LTD.;REEL/FRAME:021118/0061 Effective date: 20080330 Owner name: PLENUS II (D.C.M), ISRAEL Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:NEGEVTECH LTD.;REEL/FRAME:021118/0061 Effective date: 20080330 Owner name: PLENUS II, L.P.,ISRAEL Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:NEGEVTECH LTD.;REEL/FRAME:021118/0061 Effective date: 20080330 Owner name: PLENUS II (D.C.M),ISRAEL Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:NEGEVTECH LTD.;REEL/FRAME:021118/0061 Effective date: 20080330 |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: PAT HOLDER NO LONGER CLAIMS SMALL ENTITY STATUS, ENTITY STATUS SET TO UNDISCOUNTED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: STOL); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 12TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1553); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY Year of fee payment: 12 |