US7113899B2 - Method and system for designing an electric machine stator including keybars - Google Patents
Method and system for designing an electric machine stator including keybars Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US7113899B2 US7113899B2 US09/681,571 US68157101A US7113899B2 US 7113899 B2 US7113899 B2 US 7113899B2 US 68157101 A US68157101 A US 68157101A US 7113899 B2 US7113899 B2 US 7113899B2
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- keybars
- stator
- keybar
- adjusting
- selecting
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Fee Related, expires
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H02—GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
- H02K—DYNAMO-ELECTRIC MACHINES
- H02K1/00—Details of the magnetic circuit
- H02K1/06—Details of the magnetic circuit characterised by the shape, form or construction
- H02K1/12—Stationary parts of the magnetic circuit
- H02K1/18—Means for mounting or fastening magnetic stationary parts on to, or to, the stator structures
- H02K1/185—Means for mounting or fastening magnetic stationary parts on to, or to, the stator structures to outer stators
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H02—GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
- H02K—DYNAMO-ELECTRIC MACHINES
- H02K15/00—Processes or apparatus specially adapted for manufacturing, assembling, maintaining or repairing of dynamo-electric machines
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H02—GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
- H02K—DYNAMO-ELECTRIC MACHINES
- H02K11/00—Structural association of dynamo-electric machines with electric components or with devices for shielding, monitoring or protection
- H02K11/01—Structural association of dynamo-electric machines with electric components or with devices for shielding, monitoring or protection for shielding from electromagnetic fields, i.e. structural association with shields
- H02K11/014—Shields associated with stationary parts, e.g. stator cores
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10T—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
- Y10T29/00—Metal working
- Y10T29/49—Method of mechanical manufacture
- Y10T29/49002—Electrical device making
- Y10T29/49009—Dynamoelectric machine
Definitions
- the invention relates generally to electric machine stators.
- Stators of large electric machines, especially generators, are typically built with a standard number of keybars and two flanges. One flange is positioned at each end to mechanically couple the keybars and support the stator. The number of the keybars and sizes of the keybars and the flanges are designed mainly for meeting mechanical requirements of the stator.
- keybars generally comprise magnetic or non-magnetic steel or steel alloys. Such materials are electrically conductive. Due to the keybars being situated in the vicinity of magnetic fields and being electrically conductive, adverse electromagnetic effects result and limit electric machine rating and performance.
- Keybar voltage restricts the stator yoke (back iron) flux density.
- the main cause of keybar voltage is leakage flux that spills behind the stator core outer surface. If electromagnetic effects of the keybars can be reduced, electrical design engineers would have more freedom and fewer restrictions to further optimize the machine and thus be able to reduce the machine cost without sacrificing efficiency and reliability in a safe manner.
- keybar voltages in electric machines are reduced by electromagnetically optimizing the positioning of the keybars with respect to stator (armature) winding phase belts, the selection of the number of keybars, the selection of the number of stator slots, and/or the direction of rotation of a rotor with respect to the stator.
- FIGS. 1 and 2 are side (radial-axial plane) and cross-sectional (radial-peripheral plane) views of a conventional electric machine with a keybar and flange system.
- FIG. 3 is a block diagram illustrating an embodiment wherein alternative keybar positions are available.
- FIGS. 1 and 2 are side (radial-axial plane) and cross-sectional (radial-peripheral plane) views of a conventional electric machine 10 including a rotor 18 and a stator 16 including a stator flange 14 , stator lamination 24 layer segments 26 (hereinafter referred to as “lamination segments”) coupled to a stator frame 40 and section plates 38 by keybars 12 , and stator winding 20 phase belts 28 and 30 within stator slots 22 of the lamination segments.
- phase belt 28 corresponds to a phase belt for outer winding layer 20
- phase belt 30 corresponds to a phase belt for inner winding layer 21 .
- a method for designing stator 16 comprises determining electromagnetic effects of adjusting positions of the keybars with respect to positions of the phase belts, and selecting a position of the keybars with respect to a position of the phase belts which provides minimal adverse electromagnetic effects (meaning less adverse electromagnetic effects as compared with the other position(s)) from phenomena such as keybar voltage, for example.
- the determination of the electromagnetic effects may be made by simulation in a computer (not shown) or by physical testing.
- advanced analytical methods such as time stepping finite elements with rotation permit a designer to quantitatively determine the subtle effects of relative locations of the keybars with respect to the phase belts on keybar voltages for a given load. The designer can then choose the positioning that minimizes the keybar voltages with the result being an optimized and more reliable machine design. “Designing” may occur either before the stator is fabricated or in a retrofit environment. If it is determined by using an embodiment of the present invention that another position of the phase belts would be advantageous, connections to the stator winding layers can be shifted accordingly.
- This embodiment can be used to reduce keybar voltages without the need for any physical changes in the machine and hence will have no adverse impact on all other design considerations. Also, by reducing the keybar voltages, this embodiment reduces the keybar currents through threaded and surface contacts between the keybars and the flanges, both electrically high resistance materials, and thus reduces the potential for arcing and pitting.
- FIG. 3 is a block diagram illustrating an embodiment wherein alternative keybar positions are available.
- the stator slots 22 are shown in linear form rather than curved form, and only three of the six phase belts of the outer winding layer are illustrated.
- the embodiment of FIG. 3 is for a two pole electric machine with 54 stator slots.
- the number of stator slots 22 per phase belt 28 can be calculated by dividing the number of stator slots by the number of phases and by the number of poles. In other words, for a three phase two pole 54 stator slot machine, the number of stator slots per phase belt is 9 (54/(3*2)).
- two different keybar position options 32 and 34 result.
- a first option 32 keybars are positioned to be in alignment with the first, fourth, and seventh stator slots of each phase belt 28 .
- a second option 34 keybars are positioned to be in alignment with the second, fifth, and eight stator slots of each phase belt.
- the keybars are balanced such that changing position of the keybars is not expected to have a change in the electromagnetic effect. In other words, there may not exist any alternate relative positions for keybars with respect to the stator phase belts.
- another embodiment of the present invention is to determine electromagnetic effects of adjusting the number of keybars and to select a number of the keybars which provides minimal adverse electromagnetic effects.
- This keybar number embodiment may be used separately from or in conjunction with the above-discussed keybar position embodiment.
- some stators having 42 stator slots use 14 lamination segments whereas others use 21 lamination segments.
- the two alternatives can be compared to determine electromagnetic effects and arrive at a preferred design provided that other design aspects are not compromised.
- electromagnetic effects are determined based on the number of stator slots (or, in other words, the stator phase belt span), and the number of the stator slots is selected which provides minimal adverse electromagnetic effects.
- a method for operating electric machine 10 of FIG. 1 comprises selecting a direction of rotation of rotor 18 which provides minimal adverse electromagnetic effects on the keybars 12 .
- a particular machine can be designed by evaluating physical constraints and reviewing options to arrive at a design which collectively minimizes electromagnetic effects.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Power Engineering (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Electromagnetism (AREA)
- Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
- Iron Core Of Rotating Electric Machines (AREA)
- Manufacture Of Motors, Generators (AREA)
Abstract
Keybar voltages in electric machines are reduced by electromagnetically optimizing the positioning of the keybars with respect to stator winding phase belts, the selection of the number of keybars, the selection of the number of stator slots, and/or the direction of rotation of a rotor with respect to the stator.
Description
The invention relates generally to electric machine stators.
Stators of large electric machines, especially generators, are typically built with a standard number of keybars and two flanges. One flange is positioned at each end to mechanically couple the keybars and support the stator. The number of the keybars and sizes of the keybars and the flanges are designed mainly for meeting mechanical requirements of the stator.
For mechanical stability, keybars generally comprise magnetic or non-magnetic steel or steel alloys. Such materials are electrically conductive. Due to the keybars being situated in the vicinity of magnetic fields and being electrically conductive, adverse electromagnetic effects result and limit electric machine rating and performance.
Keybar voltage restricts the stator yoke (back iron) flux density. The main cause of keybar voltage is leakage flux that spills behind the stator core outer surface. If electromagnetic effects of the keybars can be reduced, electrical design engineers would have more freedom and fewer restrictions to further optimize the machine and thus be able to reduce the machine cost without sacrificing efficiency and reliability in a safe manner.
It would therefore be desirable to reduce keybar voltages in electric machines (and thus reduce adverse electromagnetic effects) without compromising the integrity of the electric machines.
Briefly, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention, keybar voltages in electric machines are reduced by electromagnetically optimizing the positioning of the keybars with respect to stator (armature) winding phase belts, the selection of the number of keybars, the selection of the number of stator slots, and/or the direction of rotation of a rotor with respect to the stator.
The features of the invention believed to be novel are set forth with particularity in the appended claims. The invention itself, however, both as to organization and method of operation, together with further objects and advantages thereof, may best be understood by reference to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, where like numerals represent like components, in which:
The influence of the number of keybars, the stator winding phase belt span (dependent on the number of stator slots, the number of magnetic poles, and the number of phases), and relative locations on electromagnetic interactions (keybar voltages, for example) is complex, and operating point or load dependent. Conventional stator fabrication techniques and design methods have not contemplated or attempted to correlate these relations.
In one embodiment of the present invention, a method for designing stator 16 comprises determining electromagnetic effects of adjusting positions of the keybars with respect to positions of the phase belts, and selecting a position of the keybars with respect to a position of the phase belts which provides minimal adverse electromagnetic effects (meaning less adverse electromagnetic effects as compared with the other position(s)) from phenomena such as keybar voltage, for example.
The determination of the electromagnetic effects may be made by simulation in a computer (not shown) or by physical testing. In embodiments wherein computer simulation is selected, advanced analytical methods such as time stepping finite elements with rotation permit a designer to quantitatively determine the subtle effects of relative locations of the keybars with respect to the phase belts on keybar voltages for a given load. The designer can then choose the positioning that minimizes the keybar voltages with the result being an optimized and more reliable machine design. “Designing” may occur either before the stator is fabricated or in a retrofit environment. If it is determined by using an embodiment of the present invention that another position of the phase belts would be advantageous, connections to the stator winding layers can be shifted accordingly.
This embodiment can be used to reduce keybar voltages without the need for any physical changes in the machine and hence will have no adverse impact on all other design considerations. Also, by reducing the keybar voltages, this embodiment reduces the keybar currents through threaded and surface contacts between the keybars and the flanges, both electrically high resistance materials, and thus reduces the potential for arcing and pitting.
The embodiment of FIG. 3 is for a two pole electric machine with 54 stator slots. The number of stator slots 22 per phase belt 28 can be calculated by dividing the number of stator slots by the number of phases and by the number of poles. In other words, for a three phase two pole 54 stator slot machine, the number of stator slots per phase belt is 9 (54/(3*2)). The number of lamination segments 26 (and corresponding keybars 12 shown in FIG. 2 ) is generally an industry standard for conventional manufacturing techniques. Machines with 54 stator slots, for example, typically comprise 18 lamination segments and 18 keybars. Thus, there is one keybar for every three stator slots (54/18=3).
As can be seen in FIG. 3 , two different keybar position options 32 and 34 (represented by x's) result. In a first option 32, keybars are positioned to be in alignment with the first, fourth, and seventh stator slots of each phase belt 28. In a second option 34, keybars are positioned to be in alignment with the second, fifth, and eight stator slots of each phase belt.
In some electric machines with predefined numbers of stator slots and keybars, the keybars are balanced such that changing position of the keybars is not expected to have a change in the electromagnetic effect. In other words, there may not exist any alternate relative positions for keybars with respect to the stator phase belts.
For new machines or machines where there is some flexibility, another embodiment of the present invention is to determine electromagnetic effects of adjusting the number of keybars and to select a number of the keybars which provides minimal adverse electromagnetic effects. This keybar number embodiment may be used separately from or in conjunction with the above-discussed keybar position embodiment.
In one example, some stators having 42 stator slots use 14 lamination segments whereas others use 21 lamination segments. The two alternatives can be compared to determine electromagnetic effects and arrive at a preferred design provided that other design aspects are not compromised.
In still another embodiment, which may be used separately or in combination with either or both of the above embodiments, electromagnetic effects are determined based on the number of stator slots (or, in other words, the stator phase belt span), and the number of the stator slots is selected which provides minimal adverse electromagnetic effects.
In any of the above embodiments, it is to be understood that non-electromagnetic restrictions many affect the overall machine design. For example, for a given generator, the largest lamination segment that can be stamped would put a lower limit on the number of keybars.
Another factor which can be used in evaluating design options is whether changing the direction of rotation of a rotor in the resulting machine results in different electromagnetic effects. One reason such effects might differ is that phase belts 28 and 30 of outer and inner winding layers 20 and 21 are typically offset as can be seen in FIG. 1 , for example, which illustrates “short pitching” the stator winding layers to reduce harmonics. In this embodiment, a method for operating electric machine 10 of FIG. 1 comprises selecting a direction of rotation of rotor 18 which provides minimal adverse electromagnetic effects on the keybars 12.
When multiple embodiments are used in combination, a particular machine can be designed by evaluating physical constraints and reviewing options to arrive at a design which collectively minimizes electromagnetic effects.
While only certain features of the invention have been illustrated and described herein, many modifications and changes will occur to those skilled in the art. It is, therefore, to be understood that the appended claims are intended to cover all such modifications and changes as fall within the true spirit of the invention.
Claims (18)
1. A method for designing a stator for an electric machine comprising lamination segments coupled to a stator frame by keybars and stator winding phase belts within stator slots of the lamination segments, the method comprising:
determining effects on at least one of keybar voltage or keybar current of adjusting positions of the keybars with respect to positions of the phase belts; and
selecting a position of the keybars with respect to a position of the phase belts which provides minimal keybar voltage.
2. The method of claim 1 further comprising determining effects of adjusting the number of keybars, and wherein selecting the position of the keybars comprises selecting both the position of the keybars and a number of the keybars to provide minimal keybar voltage.
3. The method of claim 1 further comprising determining effects of adjusting the number of stator slots, and wherein selecting the position of the keybars comprises selecting both the position of the keybars and a number of the stator slots to provide minimal keybar voltage.
4. The method of claim 1 further comprising determining effects of adjusting a direction of rotation of a rotor with respect to the stator, and wherein selecting the position of the keybars comprises selecting both the position of the keybars and a direction of rotation to provide minimal keybar voltage.
5. A method for designing a stator for an electric machine comprising lamination segments coupled to a stator frame by keybars and stator winding phase belts within stator slots of the lamination segments, the method comprising:
determining effects on at least one of keybar voltage or keybar current of adjusting positions of the keybars with respect to positions of the phase belts, adjusting the number of keybars, and adjusting the number of stator slots; and
selecting a position of the keybars with respect to a position of the phase belts, a number of the keybars, and a number of stator slots which collectively provide minimal keybar voltage.
6. The method of claim 5 further comprising determining effects of adjusting a direction of rotation of a rotor with respect to the stator, and selecting a direction of rotation to provide minimal keybar voltage.
7. A method for designing a stator for an electric machine comprising lamination segments coupled to a stator frame by keybars and stator winding phase belts within stator slots of the lamination segments, the method comprising:
determining effects on at least one of keybar voltage or keybar current of adjusting the number of keybars; and
selecting a number of the keybars which provides minimal keybar voltage.
8. The method of claim 7 further comprising determining effects of adjusting the number of stator slots, and wherein selecting the number of the keybars comprises selecting both the number of the keybars and a number of the stator slots to provide minimal keybar voltage.
9. A method for designing a stator for an electric machine comprising lamination segments coupled to a stator frame by keybars and stator winding phase belts within stator slots of the lamination segments, the method comprising:
determining effects on at least one of keybar voltage or keybar current of adjusting the number of stator slots; and
selecting a number of the stator slots which provides minimal keybar voltage.
10. A method for operating an electric machine comprising a rotor and a stator comprising lamination segments coupled to a stator frame by keybars and stator winding phase belts within stator slots of the lamination segments, the method comprising selecting a direction of rotation of the rotor which provides minimal keybar voltage.
11. A system for designing a stator for an electric machine comprising lamination segments coupled to a stator frame by keybars and stator winding phase belts within stator slots of the lamination segments, the system comprising:
means for determining effects on at least one of keybar voltage or keybar current of adjusting positions of the keybars with respect to positions of the phase belts; and
means for selecting a position of the keybars with respect to a position of the phase belts which provides minimal keybar voltage.
12. The system of claim 10 wherein the means for determining and the means for selecting comprise a computer.
13. A system for designing a stator for an electric machine comprising lamination segments coupled to a stator frame by keybars and stator winding phase belts within stator slots of the lamination segments, the system comprising:
means for determining effects on at least one of keybar voltage or keybar current of adjusting positions of the keybars with respect to positions of the phase belts, adjusting the number of keybars, and adjusting the number of stator slots; and
means for selecting a position of the keybars with respect to a position of the phase belts, a number of the keybars, and a number of stator slots which collectively provides minimal keybar voltage.
14. A system for designing a stator for an electric machine comprising lamination segments coupled to a stator frame by keybars and stator winding phase belts with in stator slots of the lamination segments, the system comprising:
means for determining effects on at least one of keybar voltage or keybar current of adjusting the number of keybars; and
means for selecting a number of the keybars which provides minimal keybar voltage.
15. A system for designing a stator for an electric machine comprising lamination segments coupled to a stator frame by keybars and stator winding phase belts within stator slots of the lamination segments, the system comprising:
means for determining effects on at least one of keybar voltage or keybar current of adjusting the number of stator slots; and
means for selecting a number of the stator slots which provides minimal keybar voltage.
16. A system for designing a stator for an electric machine comprising lamination segments coupled to a stator frame by keybars and stator winding phase belts within stator slots of the lamination segments, the system comprising a computer for performing simulations to determine effects on at least one of keybar voltage or keybar current of adjusting positions of the keybars with respect to positions of the phase belts.
17. A system for designing a stator for an electric machine comprising lamination segments coupled to a stator frame by keybars and stator winding phase belts within stator slots of the lamination segments, the system comprising a computer for performing simulations to determine effects on at least one of keybar voltage or keybar current of adjusting positions of the keybars with respect to positions of the phase belts, adjusting the number of keybars, and adjusting the number of stator slots.
18. The method of claim 1 wherein determining effects on at least one of keybar voltage or keybar current of adjusting positions of the keybars with respect to positions of the phase belts comprises physical testing.
Priority Applications (6)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US09/681,571 US7113899B2 (en) | 2001-05-01 | 2001-05-01 | Method and system for designing an electric machine stator including keybars |
CA002383285A CA2383285A1 (en) | 2001-05-01 | 2002-04-25 | Design of electric machine stator including keybars |
KR1020020023630A KR100919732B1 (en) | 2001-05-01 | 2002-04-30 | Design of electric machine stator including keybars |
HU0201415A HUP0201415A3 (en) | 2001-05-01 | 2002-04-30 | Method and system for designing a stator of electric machine |
JP2002129455A JP4137506B2 (en) | 2001-05-01 | 2002-05-01 | Method for designing an electromechanical stator including a key bar |
EP02253092A EP1255342A3 (en) | 2001-05-01 | 2002-05-01 | Method and system for designing an electric machine stator including keybars |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US09/681,571 US7113899B2 (en) | 2001-05-01 | 2001-05-01 | Method and system for designing an electric machine stator including keybars |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20020163271A1 US20020163271A1 (en) | 2002-11-07 |
US7113899B2 true US7113899B2 (en) | 2006-09-26 |
Family
ID=24735845
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/681,571 Expired - Fee Related US7113899B2 (en) | 2001-05-01 | 2001-05-01 | Method and system for designing an electric machine stator including keybars |
Country Status (6)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US7113899B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1255342A3 (en) |
JP (1) | JP4137506B2 (en) |
KR (1) | KR100919732B1 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2383285A1 (en) |
HU (1) | HUP0201415A3 (en) |
Cited By (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20120074798A1 (en) * | 2010-09-23 | 2012-03-29 | Northern Power Systems, Inc. | Electromagnetic Rotary Machines Having Modular Active-Coil Portions and Modules For Such Machines |
US8179028B1 (en) | 2011-08-08 | 2012-05-15 | Rao Dantam K | Prevention of core failures in large electric machines |
US8789274B2 (en) | 2010-09-23 | 2014-07-29 | Northern Power Systems, Inc. | Method and system for servicing a horizontal-axis wind power unit |
US8912704B2 (en) | 2010-09-23 | 2014-12-16 | Northern Power Systems, Inc. | Sectionalized electromechanical machines having low torque ripple and low cogging torque characteristics |
US9281731B2 (en) | 2010-09-23 | 2016-03-08 | Northem Power Systems, Inc. | Method for maintaining a machine having a rotor and a stator |
US9359994B2 (en) | 2010-09-23 | 2016-06-07 | Northern Power Systems, Inc. | Module-handling tool for installing/removing modules into/from an electromagnetic rotary machine having a modularized active portion |
Families Citing this family (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7113899B2 (en) * | 2001-05-01 | 2006-09-26 | General Electric Company | Method and system for designing an electric machine stator including keybars |
CH698498B1 (en) * | 2006-03-31 | 2009-08-31 | Alstom Technology Ltd | Magnetic shield in front range of stator of three phase generators. |
JP5467840B2 (en) * | 2009-10-13 | 2014-04-09 | 株式会社日立産機システム | Permanent magnet motor |
Citations (12)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3652889A (en) | 1971-01-18 | 1972-03-28 | Gen Electric | Laminated dynamoelectric machine core and method of stacking |
US3987325A (en) | 1974-09-30 | 1976-10-19 | General Electric Company | Short-circuiting rings for dynamoelectric machine |
JPS5778334A (en) | 1980-10-31 | 1982-05-17 | Hitachi Ltd | Stator of electric machine |
US4564779A (en) | 1984-09-14 | 1986-01-14 | General Electric Company | Dynamoelectric machine stator using cylindrical keybars |
US4837471A (en) * | 1987-10-23 | 1989-06-06 | General Electric Company | Dynamoelectric machine stator using cylindrical keybar with improved dovetail configuration |
US4916803A (en) | 1988-10-17 | 1990-04-17 | General Electric Company | Stator keybar installation using auxiliary plates |
US6104116A (en) * | 1999-04-16 | 2000-08-15 | Siemens Westinghouse Power Corporation | Generator stator keybar compliant clamp and current shunt |
US20020079782A1 (en) * | 2000-12-27 | 2002-06-27 | Shah Manoj Ramprasad | Power generator |
US6429567B1 (en) * | 2000-12-27 | 2002-08-06 | General Electric Company | Power generator |
EP1255342A2 (en) * | 2001-05-01 | 2002-11-06 | General Electric Company | Method and system for designing an electric machine stator including keybars |
US6499002B1 (en) * | 1999-02-17 | 2002-12-24 | General Electric Company | System and method for generating a noise index for a mechanical system |
US6720699B1 (en) * | 2002-10-25 | 2004-04-13 | General Electric Company | Keybar voltage and current reduction for a power generator assembly |
Family Cites Families (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6321439B1 (en) * | 1997-01-21 | 2001-11-27 | Siemens Westinghouse Power Corporation | Method for assembly of a stator in the field |
-
2001
- 2001-05-01 US US09/681,571 patent/US7113899B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2002
- 2002-04-25 CA CA002383285A patent/CA2383285A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2002-04-30 KR KR1020020023630A patent/KR100919732B1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2002-04-30 HU HU0201415A patent/HUP0201415A3/en unknown
- 2002-05-01 JP JP2002129455A patent/JP4137506B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2002-05-01 EP EP02253092A patent/EP1255342A3/en not_active Withdrawn
Patent Citations (14)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3652889A (en) | 1971-01-18 | 1972-03-28 | Gen Electric | Laminated dynamoelectric machine core and method of stacking |
US3987325A (en) | 1974-09-30 | 1976-10-19 | General Electric Company | Short-circuiting rings for dynamoelectric machine |
JPS5778334A (en) | 1980-10-31 | 1982-05-17 | Hitachi Ltd | Stator of electric machine |
US4564779A (en) | 1984-09-14 | 1986-01-14 | General Electric Company | Dynamoelectric machine stator using cylindrical keybars |
US4837471A (en) * | 1987-10-23 | 1989-06-06 | General Electric Company | Dynamoelectric machine stator using cylindrical keybar with improved dovetail configuration |
US4916803A (en) | 1988-10-17 | 1990-04-17 | General Electric Company | Stator keybar installation using auxiliary plates |
US6499002B1 (en) * | 1999-02-17 | 2002-12-24 | General Electric Company | System and method for generating a noise index for a mechanical system |
US6104116A (en) * | 1999-04-16 | 2000-08-15 | Siemens Westinghouse Power Corporation | Generator stator keybar compliant clamp and current shunt |
US6429567B1 (en) * | 2000-12-27 | 2002-08-06 | General Electric Company | Power generator |
US20020079782A1 (en) * | 2000-12-27 | 2002-06-27 | Shah Manoj Ramprasad | Power generator |
EP1255342A2 (en) * | 2001-05-01 | 2002-11-06 | General Electric Company | Method and system for designing an electric machine stator including keybars |
US20020163271A1 (en) * | 2001-05-01 | 2002-11-07 | Shah Manoj Ramprasad | Electric machine stator including keybars |
US6720699B1 (en) * | 2002-10-25 | 2004-04-13 | General Electric Company | Keybar voltage and current reduction for a power generator assembly |
US20040080230A1 (en) * | 2002-10-25 | 2004-04-29 | General Electric Company | Keybar voltage and current reduction for a power generator assembly |
Non-Patent Citations (20)
Title |
---|
A Copy of The EPO Search Report Dated Dec. 2, 2004 is Enclosed. |
Arshad, W. et al. "Investigating Manufacturing Defects in a Linear Transverse-Flux Machine for a Free-Piston Generator." Undated. http://eme.ekc.kth.se/publications/pdf/2003/waqas-jens-alija-peter-mats-birmingham2003.pdf. * |
Bennington, B.J. "Man-Machine Interaction in the Design of Rotating Electrical Machines." Proc. of the 6th Annual DAC. 1969. pp. 45-59. * |
Cai, W. et al. "Resonant Frequencies and Mode Shapes of Switched Reluctance Motors." IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion. Mar. 2001. vol. 16, Issue 1, pp. 43-48. * |
Durantay, L. et al. "Large Band Reduction of Magnetic Vibrations of Induction Machines with "Breaking of Impedence" Interface." Int'l Conf. of Electric Machines and Drives (IEMD '99). May 9-12, 1999. pp. 475-477. * |
Fahimi, B. et al. "Design Considerations of Switched Reluctance Motors: Vibration Control Issues". Conf. Record of the 1999 IEEE 34th IAS Annual Meeting. Oct. 3-7, 1999. vol. 4, pp. 2259-2266. * |
Gieras, J. et al., "Calculation of Synchronous Reactances of Small Permanent-Magnet Alternating-Current Motors: Comparison of Analytical Approach and Finite Element Method with Measurements." IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Sep. 1998, vol. 34, No. 5, p. * |
Hansen, C. "The AC Power Line and Audio Equipment". audioXpress, 1991. Issue 10, pp. 66-73. * |
Infolytica Corporation. FastTrack Reference Manual for MagNet 52. (C) 1996. * |
Ito, H. et al. "Dynamic Characteristics and design technology of Turbine Generator Stator Frame." IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion. Jun. 1988. vol. 3, Issue 2, pp. 420-426. * |
Jang, G.H. et al. "The Effect of Magnet Geometry on Electric Motor Vibration." IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. Jun. 18-21, 1991. vol. 27, Issue 6, pp. 5202-5204. * |
Jones, G.R. et al. Electrical Engineer's Reference Book. 15th Ed. 1993. Chapter 20. * |
Kerszenbaum, I. "Shaft Currents in Electric Machines Fed by Solid-State Drives." IEEE Conf. of Industrial and COmmercial Power Systems. May 1992. pp. 71-79. * |
Nandi, S. et al. "Fault Diagnosis of Electrical Machines-A Review." Int'l Conf. IEMD '99. May 1999. pp. 219-221. * |
Nandi, S. et al. "Performance Analysis of a Single Phase Induction Motor Under Eccentric Conditions." IEEE IAS '97 Conf. Oct. 1997. vol. 1, pp. 174-181. * |
Osama, M. et al. "Modeling and Analysis of a Wide-Speed-Range Induction Motor Drive Based on Electronic Pole Changing." IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications. Oct. 1997. Vo.33, No. 5, pp. 1177-1184. * |
Perkins, K. et al. "Special Problems in the Installation of Large Electrical Machines", Power Engineering Journal, Jan. 1992. vol. 6, Issue 1, pp. 21-31. * |
Pillay, P. et al. "Labview Implementation of Speed Detection for Mains-Fed Motors Using Motor CUrrent Signature Analysis." IEEE Power Engineering Review. Jun. 1998. vol. 18, Issue 6, pp. 47-48. * |
Radatz, J. et al. The IEEE Standard Dictionary of Electrical and Electronics Terms. 6th Ed. IEEE Std. 100-1996. 1996. ISBN 1-55937-833-6. pp. 46, 230, 415, 565, 566, 765, 936, 1044. * |
Rafajlovski, G. et al. "Digital Simulation of Field Oriented Control Using ANSIM Program." 8th Mediterranean Electromechanical Conference, 1996. (MELECON '96). May 13-16, 1996. vol. 3, pp. 1223-1226. * |
Cited By (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20120074798A1 (en) * | 2010-09-23 | 2012-03-29 | Northern Power Systems, Inc. | Electromagnetic Rotary Machines Having Modular Active-Coil Portions and Modules For Such Machines |
US8789274B2 (en) | 2010-09-23 | 2014-07-29 | Northern Power Systems, Inc. | Method and system for servicing a horizontal-axis wind power unit |
US8816546B2 (en) * | 2010-09-23 | 2014-08-26 | Northern Power Systems, Inc. | Electromagnetic rotary machines having modular active-coil portions and modules for such machines |
US8912704B2 (en) | 2010-09-23 | 2014-12-16 | Northern Power Systems, Inc. | Sectionalized electromechanical machines having low torque ripple and low cogging torque characteristics |
US9281731B2 (en) | 2010-09-23 | 2016-03-08 | Northem Power Systems, Inc. | Method for maintaining a machine having a rotor and a stator |
US9359994B2 (en) | 2010-09-23 | 2016-06-07 | Northern Power Systems, Inc. | Module-handling tool for installing/removing modules into/from an electromagnetic rotary machine having a modularized active portion |
US9812909B2 (en) | 2010-09-23 | 2017-11-07 | Weg Electric Corp | Sectionalized electromechanical machines having low torque ripple and low cogging torque characteristics |
US8179028B1 (en) | 2011-08-08 | 2012-05-15 | Rao Dantam K | Prevention of core failures in large electric machines |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US20020163271A1 (en) | 2002-11-07 |
EP1255342A2 (en) | 2002-11-06 |
CA2383285A1 (en) | 2002-11-01 |
EP1255342A3 (en) | 2004-03-31 |
HU0201415D0 (en) | 2002-06-29 |
HUP0201415A2 (en) | 2003-05-28 |
KR100919732B1 (en) | 2009-09-29 |
KR20020084699A (en) | 2002-11-09 |
JP4137506B2 (en) | 2008-08-20 |
JP2003023739A (en) | 2003-01-24 |
HUP0201415A3 (en) | 2004-05-28 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Yeo et al. | Magnetic equivalent circuit model considering overhang structure of a surface-mounted permanent-magnet motor | |
Yeo et al. | Magnetic equivalent circuit model considering the overhang structure of an interior permanent-magnet machine | |
Comanescu et al. | Design and analysis of 42-V permanent-magnet generator for automotive applications | |
Yoshida et al. | Eddy-current loss analysis in PM of surface-mounted-PM SM for electric vehicles | |
Akuru et al. | Intriguing behavioral characteristics of rare-earth-free flux switching wind generators at small-and large-scale power levels | |
Tangudu et al. | Design, analysis and loss minimization of a fractional-slot concentrated winding IPM machine for traction applications | |
US20080203848A1 (en) | Electrical Motor/Generator Having A Number Of Stator Pole Cores Being Larger Than A Number Of Rotor Pole Shoes | |
Choi et al. | Analysis and design recommendations to mitigate demagnetization vulnerability in surface PM synchronous machines | |
US6504281B1 (en) | Synchronous machine fault tolerant arrangement | |
US7113899B2 (en) | Method and system for designing an electric machine stator including keybars | |
Yeo et al. | Novel analytical method for overhang effects in surface-mounted permanent-magnet machines | |
Petrov et al. | Fault-tolerant modular stator concentrated winding permanent magnet machine | |
Yousuf et al. | Reduction of torque ripples in multi-stack slotless axial flux machine by using right angled trapezoidal permanent magnet | |
Shastri et al. | Design and analysis of brushless dc motors for ceiling fan application | |
Luo et al. | Analysis and design of ironless toroidal winding of tubular linear voice coil motor for minimum copper loss | |
Sizov et al. | Automated bi-objective design optimization of multi-mw direct-drive pm machines using ce-fea and differential evolution | |
Idoko et al. | Performance Comparison of Conventional and Double-Stator Wound-Field Flux Switching Machine for High Torque Density Applications | |
Wu et al. | Stator design for a 1000 kW HTSC motor with air-gap winding | |
Nie et al. | Compensation analysis of longitudinal end effect in three‐phase switched reluctance linear machines | |
Zhang | A novel design optimization of a fault-tolerant ac permanent magnet machine-drive system | |
Lekić et al. | Finite element design of rotor permanent magnet flux switching machine with arbitrary slot, pole and phase combinations | |
Jara et al. | Closed-Form solution for the slot leakage inductance of tooth-coil-winding permanent magnet machines | |
FI128226B (en) | An electric machine element, a method for manufacturing the same, and an electric machine | |
US11894724B2 (en) | Alternator with rotor lamination stack | |
Muhammad et al. | Design and FEM analysis of high‐power density C‐core permanent magnet transverse flux generator with reduced PM volume |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, NEW YORK Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:SHAH, MANOJ RAMPRASAD;SALEM, SAMEH RAMADAN;REEL/FRAME:011788/0290;SIGNING DATES FROM 20010427 TO 20010430 |
|
REMI | Maintenance fee reminder mailed | ||
LAPS | Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees | ||
STCH | Information on status: patent discontinuation |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362 |
|
FP | Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee |
Effective date: 20100926 |