+

US7039385B1 - Method and apparatus for automatic center frequency tuning of tunable bandpass filters - Google Patents

Method and apparatus for automatic center frequency tuning of tunable bandpass filters Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US7039385B1
US7039385B1 US10/452,887 US45288703A US7039385B1 US 7039385 B1 US7039385 B1 US 7039385B1 US 45288703 A US45288703 A US 45288703A US 7039385 B1 US7039385 B1 US 7039385B1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
frequency
phase
tunable bandpass
bandpass filter
filter
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime, expires
Application number
US10/452,887
Inventor
Theodore J. Hoffmann
Mark M. Mulbrook
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Rockwell Collins Inc
Original Assignee
Rockwell Collins Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Rockwell Collins Inc filed Critical Rockwell Collins Inc
Priority to US10/452,887 priority Critical patent/US7039385B1/en
Assigned to ROCKWELL COLLINS, INC. reassignment ROCKWELL COLLINS, INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: HOFFMANN, THEODORE J., MULBROOK, MARK M.
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US7039385B1 publication Critical patent/US7039385B1/en
Adjusted expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04BTRANSMISSION
    • H04B1/00Details of transmission systems, not covered by a single one of groups H04B3/00 - H04B13/00; Details of transmission systems not characterised by the medium used for transmission
    • H04B1/06Receivers
    • H04B1/10Means associated with receiver for limiting or suppressing noise or interference
    • H04B1/1027Means associated with receiver for limiting or suppressing noise or interference assessing signal quality or detecting noise/interference for the received signal
    • H04B1/1036Means associated with receiver for limiting or suppressing noise or interference assessing signal quality or detecting noise/interference for the received signal with automatic suppression of narrow band noise or interference, e.g. by using tuneable notch filters

Definitions

  • This invention relates to radios, tunable bandpass filters used in radios, and specifically to automatically tuning a bandpass filter.
  • FIG. 1 is an exemplary block diagram of a radio receiver 10 employing a RF tunable bandpass filter 15 at the input to the receiver 10 connected between an antenna 12 and a low-noise amplifier 17 .
  • a IF tunable filter 20 is also used connected between a mixer 18 and an IF amplifier 22 or elsewhere within a receiver IF.
  • a local oscillator or frequency synthesizer 16 provides the injection for mixer 18 for down conversion to IF.
  • the tunable bandpass filters 15 and 20 provide needed selectivity to reduce image responses, interference, and spurious signal response problems brought about by strong adjacent frequency signals.
  • the IF output is processed by a digital signal processing and control processor 25 where additional filtering, decimation, and demodulation are performed.
  • a transmitter (not shown) with tunable bandpass filters may also be implemented with RF tunable bandpass filters and IF tunable bandpass filters. Bandpass filters in transmitters are used to reduce radiation of undesired signals such as harmonics, spurious responses, etc.
  • Tunable bandpass filters require time and effort by a test technician to adjust during production test for use in a product. Tunable bandpass filters may age over the lifetime of a radio degrading performance and may require periodic realignment by a technician. Manual tuning and adjustment of tunable bandpass filters by a technician can be costly.
  • tunable bandpass filters are tested and aligned by injecting a test signal and monitoring the magnitude of the test signal at an output of the tunable filter. Monitoring the magnitude is straight forward and easily implemented. Unfortunately, peak magnitude of tunable bandpass filters can vary over the filter tunable bandwidth. If the passband of the tunable bandpass filter is wide enough, magnitude information is not enough to find the center of the passband unless the test signal is a swept frequency source.
  • What is needed is a method and apparatus that reduces or eliminates extensive manual tuning of tunable bandpass filters in radio equipment to reduce the cost of the radio while improving performance by utilizing processing power in the radio.
  • a radio having a tunable bandpass filter wherein the filter is tuned by apparatus within the radio comprises a reference generator for generating a reference signal to tune the tunable bandpass filter to a desired center frequency.
  • the tunable bandpass filter receives the reference signal and provides a filter output signal.
  • a digital signal processing and control processor is connected to the tunable bandpass filter to receive the filter output signal.
  • the digital signal processing and control processor provides a phase error metric from the filter output signal and tunes the tunable bandpass filter to provide a desired phase error metric signal thereby tuning the tunable bandpass filter to the desired center frequency.
  • the digital signal processing and control processor further comprises a phase comparison function that provides the phase error metric from the filter output signal.
  • the phase comparison function comprises a low-frequency quadrature down converter tuned to a frequency below the desired center frequency to down convert the filter output signal into low-frequency in-phase and quadrature outputs.
  • a high-frequency quadrature down converter is tuned to a frequency above the desired center frequency to down convert the filter output signal into high-frequency in-phase and quadrature outputs.
  • a low-frequency phase measurement block is connected to the low-frequency quadrature down converter to provide a low-frequency phase angle from the low-frequency in-phase and quadrature outputs.
  • a high-frequency phase measurement block is connected to the high-frequency quadrature down converter to provide a high-frequency phase angle from the high-frequency in-phase and quadrature outputs.
  • a summing circuit compares the low-frequency phase angle and the high-frequency phase angle to provide a difference angle.
  • An absolute value function removes a negative sign from the difference angle.
  • An integrate and dump circuit integrates and dumps the difference angle value thereby providing the phase error metric.
  • the desired phase error metric signal may be a zero phase error metric, a minimum phase error metric, or a closest match phase error metric.
  • FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a radio receiver employing a tunable bandpass filter
  • FIG. 2 is a block diagram showing how a tunable bandpass filter may be tuned using the present invention
  • FIG. 3 is a graph showing a phase and frequency responses of a typical tunable bandpass filter
  • FIG. 4 is a block diagram of a phase comparison function used in the present invention.
  • FIG. 5 is a block diagram of a quadrature down converter used in the phase comparison function of FIG. 4 ;
  • FIG. 6 is a flow chart showing processing steps used in the present invention to tune tunable bandpass filters.
  • the invention described herein utilizes an automatic tuning process performed by a digital signal processing and control processor to tune a tunable bandpass filter to a desired center frequency.
  • the present invention is applicable to tunable filters in any frequency range.
  • the tunable filters may have one or more desired center frequencies within a frequency range.
  • the tunable filter may be any type of tunable filter known in the art.
  • the tunable filter may be tuned with any electrical tuning means such as varactor tuning or discrete stepped capacitor tuning.
  • a tunable bandpass filter such as the RF tunable filter 15 or the IF tunable filter 20 used in a radio such as the receiver 10 in FIG. 1 is tuned automatically under the control of the digital signal processing and control processor 25 in the present invention.
  • the present invention can be implemented to tune the IF filter 20 or the RF filter 15 as shown in FIG. 2 in a receiver of FIG. 1 or in a transmitter (not shown) as one skilled in the art can readily recognize.
  • the present invention is described herein for an application for a receiver but can also be applied to a transmitter in a similar fashion.
  • the IF tunable filter 20 , IF amplifier 22 , and digital signal processing and control processor 25 from FIG. 1 are shown along with a switch 26 used to switch the IF tunable filter 20 between a normal operation signal path and a tune cycle signal path.
  • a tuning reference generator 27 In the tune cycle signal path a tuning reference generator 27 generates a test signal under control of the digital signal processing and control processor 25 .
  • the reference generator 27 may be located within the digital signal processing and control function 25 .
  • the reference generator 27 signal may be derived from the frequency synthesizer 16 of FIG. 1 .
  • the tuning reference generator 27 is tuned to a desired center frequency of the IF tunable filter 20 . If the RF tunable filter 15 is being tuned, the reference generator 27 is tuned to the desired center frequency of the RF tunable filter 15 .
  • FIG. 3 is a graph showing phase and frequency responses of a typical tunable bandpass filter. Phase shift is shown on the left and magnitude on the right vertical axes of the graph. Frequency is shown on the horizontal axis. Curve 30 shows the magnitude response of the filter and curve 31 the phase response of the typical filter.
  • the tunable bandpass filter (15 or 20) desired center frequency is labeled ftune.
  • Point 32 on phase response curve 31 is the phase shift of the tunable bandpass filter at some frequency ftune ⁇ f below the filter center frequency ftune.
  • Point 33 on the phase response curve 31 is the phase shift of the tunable bandpass filter at some frequency ftune + ⁇ f above the center frequency ftune.
  • phase shift at point 32 and with the phase shift at point 33 of signals obtained by down converting a signal at the desired center frequency ftune mixed with injection frequencies at ftune ⁇ f and ftune + ⁇ f it is possible to determine if the tunable bandpass filter is tuned to the desired center tune frequency.
  • the phase comparison is accomplished by applying the reference generator 27 signal tuned to ftune to tunable bandpass filter 15 or 20 through the switch 26 as shown in FIG. 2 .
  • a phase comparison function is shown in FIG. 4 where the signal output from the tunable bandpass filter 15 or 20 is applied to two down converters 40 and 41 .
  • One down converter is a low-frequency down converter 40 and is tuned to ftune ⁇ f point 32 on curve 31 and the other down converter 41 is a high-frequency down converter and is tuned to ftune + ⁇ f point 33 on curve 31 .
  • Each of the down converters 40 and 41 may be a quadrature down converter, shown in FIG. 5 , that provides in-phase (I) and quadrature (Q) baseband outputs.
  • the input signal from the tunable bandpass filter 15 or 20 is mixed in mixers 51 and 54 with an injection signal from oscillator 52 at either the ftune ⁇ f or the ftune + ⁇ f frequency depending on down converter application.
  • the injection signal from oscillator 52 is mixed directly with the tunable bandpass signal in mixer 51 to obtain the in-phase baseband signal.
  • the injection signal from oscillator 52 is phase shifted 90° in phase shifter 53 before being mixed in mixer 54 to obtain the quadrature baseband signal.
  • Filters 55 and 56 low-pass filter the in-phase and quadrature signals.
  • the I and Q outputs of the low-frequency down converter 40 are passed to a low-frequency phase measurement block 42 where a low-frequency phase angle measurement at ftune ⁇ f is determined from the I and Q outputs using techniques known in the art.
  • the I and Q outputs of the high-frequency down converter 41 are passed to a high-frequency phase measurement block 43 where a high-frequency phase angle measurement at ftune + ⁇ f is determined.
  • Summing circuit 44 compares the low-frequency phase angle and the high-frequency phase angle and a difference angle is passed to an absolute value function 45 where any negative sign is removed.
  • the output of the absolute value function 45 is integrated and dumped in integrate and dump circuit 46 .
  • the integrate and dump circuit is reset or dumped at a typical 40 microsecond rate and other rates are possible depending on the application of the present invention.
  • the output of the integrate and dump circuit 46 is a phase error metric.
  • a low or zero phase error metric is indicative of correct tuning of the tunable bandpass filter 20 to the desired center frequency.
  • the functions shown in FIG. 4 may be performed in the digital signal processing and control processor 25 shown in FIG. 2 after digital to analog conversion that is typically present in the digital signal processing and control processor 25 .
  • the phase error metric is monitored and the processor 25 adjusts the tuning of the filter 20 until the phase error metric is zero, near zero, or at some predetermined value.
  • Tuning of the tunable bandpass filter is accomplished by electrically varying some parameter of the filter 15 or 20 .
  • a typical filter 15 or 20 may have 1024 different settings for different center frequencies.
  • the filter parameter settings may be stored in memory (not shown) in the digital signal processing and control processor 25 for tuning the filter when radio operating parameters change. Using the automatic center frequency tuning of the present invention allows faster and more accurate tuning of the filter than with manual adjustment.
  • FIG. 6 is a flow chart showing processing steps used in the present invention to tune tunable bandpass filters.
  • the reference generator 27 of FIG. 2 is tuned to a desired frequency.
  • the tunable bandpass filter 20 is set to a first tune iteration and the reference generator 27 output is applied to the tunable bandpass filter 20 through switch 26 .
  • a phase error metric is measured using the functions shown in FIG. 4 and stored at step 62 .
  • the filter is set to a next tune iteration by adjusting some parameter, depending on filter type, in the filter 20 and another phase error metric is measured and stored.
  • the steps 61 and 62 are repeated until a zero phase error metric, a minimum phase error metric, or some predetermined phase error metric is found, depending on radio system requirements.
  • the stored phase error metrics are sorted through to find filter tune parameters that provide a desired phase error metric that may be the zero phase error metric, the minimum phase error metric, or a closest match to the predetermined phase error metric for the desired tune frequency.
  • the tunable filter tune parameter settings for a desired center frequency may then be stored in memory.
  • the steps in the flow chart in FIG. 6 may then be repeated for any number of additional desired center frequency tunable bandpass filter settings under control of the digital signal processing and control processor 25 .

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Superheterodyne Receivers (AREA)

Abstract

A radio has a tunable bandpass filter that is tuned by apparatus within the radio. A reference generator generates a reference signal for use in tuning the tunable bandpass filter. The tunable bandpass filter receives the reference signal and provides a filter output signal. A digital signal processing and control processor is connected to the tunable bandpass filter to receive the filter output signal. The digital signal processing and control processor has a phase comparison function that provides a phase error metric from the filter output signal. The digital signal processing and control processor tunes the tunable bandpass filter to provide a desired phase error metric signal thereby tuning the tunable bandpass filter to the desired center frequency. The digital signal processing and control processor stores tunable filter parameters for the desired center frequency. The tuning process may be repeated for several desired center frequencies of the tunable bandpass filter.

Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to radios, tunable bandpass filters used in radios, and specifically to automatically tuning a bandpass filter.
Tunable bandpass filters are used in RF (radio frequency) and IF (intermediate frequency) stages of radio equipment such as transmitters and receivers. FIG. 1 is an exemplary block diagram of a radio receiver 10 employing a RF tunable bandpass filter 15 at the input to the receiver 10 connected between an antenna 12 and a low-noise amplifier 17. A IF tunable filter 20 is also used connected between a mixer 18 and an IF amplifier 22 or elsewhere within a receiver IF. A local oscillator or frequency synthesizer 16 provides the injection for mixer 18 for down conversion to IF. The tunable bandpass filters 15 and 20 provide needed selectivity to reduce image responses, interference, and spurious signal response problems brought about by strong adjacent frequency signals. The IF output is processed by a digital signal processing and control processor 25 where additional filtering, decimation, and demodulation are performed. A transmitter (not shown) with tunable bandpass filters may also be implemented with RF tunable bandpass filters and IF tunable bandpass filters. Bandpass filters in transmitters are used to reduce radiation of undesired signals such as harmonics, spurious responses, etc.
Tunable bandpass filters require time and effort by a test technician to adjust during production test for use in a product. Tunable bandpass filters may age over the lifetime of a radio degrading performance and may require periodic realignment by a technician. Manual tuning and adjustment of tunable bandpass filters by a technician can be costly.
Typically tunable bandpass filters are tested and aligned by injecting a test signal and monitoring the magnitude of the test signal at an output of the tunable filter. Monitoring the magnitude is straight forward and easily implemented. Unfortunately, peak magnitude of tunable bandpass filters can vary over the filter tunable bandwidth. If the passband of the tunable bandpass filter is wide enough, magnitude information is not enough to find the center of the passband unless the test signal is a swept frequency source.
What is needed is a method and apparatus that reduces or eliminates extensive manual tuning of tunable bandpass filters in radio equipment to reduce the cost of the radio while improving performance by utilizing processing power in the radio.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
A radio having a tunable bandpass filter wherein the filter is tuned by apparatus within the radio is disclosed. The apparatus comprises a reference generator for generating a reference signal to tune the tunable bandpass filter to a desired center frequency. The tunable bandpass filter receives the reference signal and provides a filter output signal. A digital signal processing and control processor is connected to the tunable bandpass filter to receive the filter output signal. The digital signal processing and control processor provides a phase error metric from the filter output signal and tunes the tunable bandpass filter to provide a desired phase error metric signal thereby tuning the tunable bandpass filter to the desired center frequency.
The digital signal processing and control processor further comprises a phase comparison function that provides the phase error metric from the filter output signal. The phase comparison function comprises a low-frequency quadrature down converter tuned to a frequency below the desired center frequency to down convert the filter output signal into low-frequency in-phase and quadrature outputs. A high-frequency quadrature down converter is tuned to a frequency above the desired center frequency to down convert the filter output signal into high-frequency in-phase and quadrature outputs.
In the phase comparison function a low-frequency phase measurement block is connected to the low-frequency quadrature down converter to provide a low-frequency phase angle from the low-frequency in-phase and quadrature outputs. A high-frequency phase measurement block is connected to the high-frequency quadrature down converter to provide a high-frequency phase angle from the high-frequency in-phase and quadrature outputs.
A summing circuit compares the low-frequency phase angle and the high-frequency phase angle to provide a difference angle. An absolute value function removes a negative sign from the difference angle.
An integrate and dump circuit integrates and dumps the difference angle value thereby providing the phase error metric. The desired phase error metric signal may be a zero phase error metric, a minimum phase error metric, or a closest match phase error metric.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a method and apparatus that reduces or eliminates extensive manual tuning of tunable bandpass filters in radio equipment to reduce the cost of the radio while improving performance by utilizing processing power in the radio.
It is an advantage of the present invention to provide a method and apparatus for tuning tunable bandpass filters that does not require any exchange or adjusting of physical parts or labor.
It is a feature of the present invention to provide a method and apparatus that can be performed during radio test or periodically to compensate for any drift due to aging in the tunable filter over the lifetime of the radio.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The invention may be more fully understood by reading the following description of the preferred embodiments of the invention in conjunction with the appended drawings wherein:
FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a radio receiver employing a tunable bandpass filter;
FIG. 2 is a block diagram showing how a tunable bandpass filter may be tuned using the present invention;
FIG. 3 is a graph showing a phase and frequency responses of a typical tunable bandpass filter;
FIG. 4 is a block diagram of a phase comparison function used in the present invention;
FIG. 5 is a block diagram of a quadrature down converter used in the phase comparison function of FIG. 4; and
FIG. 6 is a flow chart showing processing steps used in the present invention to tune tunable bandpass filters.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
The invention described herein utilizes an automatic tuning process performed by a digital signal processing and control processor to tune a tunable bandpass filter to a desired center frequency. The present invention is applicable to tunable filters in any frequency range. The tunable filters may have one or more desired center frequencies within a frequency range. The tunable filter may be any type of tunable filter known in the art. The tunable filter may be tuned with any electrical tuning means such as varactor tuning or discrete stepped capacitor tuning.
A tunable bandpass filter such as the RF tunable filter 15 or the IF tunable filter 20 used in a radio such as the receiver 10 in FIG. 1 is tuned automatically under the control of the digital signal processing and control processor 25 in the present invention. The present invention can be implemented to tune the IF filter 20 or the RF filter 15 as shown in FIG. 2 in a receiver of FIG. 1 or in a transmitter (not shown) as one skilled in the art can readily recognize. The present invention is described herein for an application for a receiver but can also be applied to a transmitter in a similar fashion.
In FIG. 2, the IF tunable filter 20, IF amplifier 22, and digital signal processing and control processor 25 from FIG. 1 are shown along with a switch 26 used to switch the IF tunable filter 20 between a normal operation signal path and a tune cycle signal path. In the tune cycle signal path a tuning reference generator 27 generates a test signal under control of the digital signal processing and control processor 25. The reference generator 27 may be located within the digital signal processing and control function 25. The reference generator 27 signal may be derived from the frequency synthesizer 16 of FIG. 1. The tuning reference generator 27 is tuned to a desired center frequency of the IF tunable filter 20. If the RF tunable filter 15 is being tuned, the reference generator 27 is tuned to the desired center frequency of the RF tunable filter 15.
FIG. 3 is a graph showing phase and frequency responses of a typical tunable bandpass filter. Phase shift is shown on the left and magnitude on the right vertical axes of the graph. Frequency is shown on the horizontal axis. Curve 30 shows the magnitude response of the filter and curve 31 the phase response of the typical filter. The tunable bandpass filter (15 or 20) desired center frequency is labeled ftune. Point 32 on phase response curve 31 is the phase shift of the tunable bandpass filter at some frequency ftune−Δf below the filter center frequency ftune. Point 33 on the phase response curve 31 is the phase shift of the tunable bandpass filter at some frequency ftune +Δf above the center frequency ftune. By comparing the phase shift at point 32 and with the phase shift at point 33 of signals obtained by down converting a signal at the desired center frequency ftune mixed with injection frequencies at ftune −Δf and ftune +Δf, it is possible to determine if the tunable bandpass filter is tuned to the desired center tune frequency.
The phase comparison is accomplished by applying the reference generator 27 signal tuned to ftune to tunable bandpass filter 15 or 20 through the switch 26 as shown in FIG. 2. A phase comparison function is shown in FIG. 4 where the signal output from the tunable bandpass filter 15 or 20 is applied to two down converters 40 and 41. One down converter is a low-frequency down converter 40 and is tuned to ftune −Δf point 32 on curve 31 and the other down converter 41 is a high-frequency down converter and is tuned to ftune +Δf point 33 on curve 31.
Each of the down converters 40 and 41 may be a quadrature down converter, shown in FIG. 5, that provides in-phase (I) and quadrature (Q) baseband outputs. The input signal from the tunable bandpass filter 15 or 20 is mixed in mixers 51 and 54 with an injection signal from oscillator 52 at either the ftune −Δf or the ftune +Δf frequency depending on down converter application. The injection signal from oscillator 52 is mixed directly with the tunable bandpass signal in mixer 51 to obtain the in-phase baseband signal. The injection signal from oscillator 52 is phase shifted 90° in phase shifter 53 before being mixed in mixer 54 to obtain the quadrature baseband signal. Filters 55 and 56 low-pass filter the in-phase and quadrature signals.
Referring back to FIG. 4, the I and Q outputs of the low-frequency down converter 40 are passed to a low-frequency phase measurement block 42 where a low-frequency phase angle measurement at ftune −Δf is determined from the I and Q outputs using techniques known in the art. Likewise the I and Q outputs of the high-frequency down converter 41 are passed to a high-frequency phase measurement block 43 where a high-frequency phase angle measurement at ftune +Δf is determined. Summing circuit 44 compares the low-frequency phase angle and the high-frequency phase angle and a difference angle is passed to an absolute value function 45 where any negative sign is removed. The output of the absolute value function 45 is integrated and dumped in integrate and dump circuit 46. The integrate and dump circuit is reset or dumped at a typical 40 microsecond rate and other rates are possible depending on the application of the present invention. The output of the integrate and dump circuit 46 is a phase error metric. A low or zero phase error metric is indicative of correct tuning of the tunable bandpass filter 20 to the desired center frequency.
The functions shown in FIG. 4 may be performed in the digital signal processing and control processor 25 shown in FIG. 2 after digital to analog conversion that is typically present in the digital signal processing and control processor 25. Within the digital signal processing and control processor 25, the phase error metric is monitored and the processor 25 adjusts the tuning of the filter 20 until the phase error metric is zero, near zero, or at some predetermined value. Tuning of the tunable bandpass filter is accomplished by electrically varying some parameter of the filter 15 or 20. A typical filter 15 or 20 may have 1024 different settings for different center frequencies. The filter parameter settings may be stored in memory (not shown) in the digital signal processing and control processor 25 for tuning the filter when radio operating parameters change. Using the automatic center frequency tuning of the present invention allows faster and more accurate tuning of the filter than with manual adjustment.
FIG. 6 is a flow chart showing processing steps used in the present invention to tune tunable bandpass filters. At step 60, the reference generator 27 of FIG. 2 is tuned to a desired frequency. At step 61 the tunable bandpass filter 20 is set to a first tune iteration and the reference generator 27 output is applied to the tunable bandpass filter 20 through switch 26. A phase error metric is measured using the functions shown in FIG. 4 and stored at step 62. The filter is set to a next tune iteration by adjusting some parameter, depending on filter type, in the filter 20 and another phase error metric is measured and stored. The steps 61 and 62 are repeated until a zero phase error metric, a minimum phase error metric, or some predetermined phase error metric is found, depending on radio system requirements. At step 63 the stored phase error metrics are sorted through to find filter tune parameters that provide a desired phase error metric that may be the zero phase error metric, the minimum phase error metric, or a closest match to the predetermined phase error metric for the desired tune frequency. The tunable filter tune parameter settings for a desired center frequency may then be stored in memory. The steps in the flow chart in FIG. 6 may then be repeated for any number of additional desired center frequency tunable bandpass filter settings under control of the digital signal processing and control processor 25.
It is believed that the method and apparatus for automatic center frequency tuning of tunable bandpass filters of the present invention and many of its attendant advantages will be understood by the foregoing description, and it will be apparent that various changes may be made in the form, construction and arrangement of the components thereof without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention or without sacrificing all of its material advantages, the form herein before described being merely an explanatory embodiment thereof. It is the intention of the following claims to encompass and include such changes.

Claims (11)

1. A radio having a tunable bandpass filter wherein said tunable bandpass filter is tuned by apparatus within said radio said apparatus comprising:
a reference generator for generating a reference signal to tune said tunable bandpass filter to a desired center frequency;
the tunable bandpass filter for receiving the reference signal and providing a filter output signal; and
a digital signal processing and control processor connected to the tunable bandpass filter to receive the filter output signal, to provide a phase error metric from the filter output signal, and to tune said tunable bandpass filter to provide a desired phase error metric thereby tuning said tunable bandpass filter to the desired center frequency said digital signal processing and control processor further comprising:
a low-frequency quadrature down converter tuned to a frequency below the desired center frequency to down convert the filter output signal into low-frequency in-phase and quadrature outputs;
a high frequency quadrature down converter tuned to a frequency above the desired center frequency to down convert the filter output signal into high-frequency in-phase and quadrature outputs;
a low-frequency phase measurement block connected to the low-frequency quadrature down converter to provide a low frequency phase angle from the low-frequency in-phase and quadrature outputs;
a high-frequency phase measurement block connected to the high-frequency quadrature down converter to provide a high-frequency phase angle from the high-frequency in-phase and quadrature outputs;
a summing circuit for comparing the low-frequency phase angle and the high-frequency phase angle and providing a difference angle;
an absolute value function for removing a negative sign from the difference angle; and
an integrate and dump circuit for integrating and dumping the difference angle value thereby providing the desired phase error metric.
2. The radio having a tunable bandpass filter of claim 1 wherein said desired phase error metric comprises one of a zero phase error metric, a minimum phase error metric, and a closest match phase error metric.
3. The radio having a tunable bandpass filter of claim 1 further comprising a switch for switching the reference signal from the reference generator to the tunable bandpass filter.
4. A method of tuning a tunable bandpass filter to a desired center frequency in a radio having tuning apparatus within said radio comprising the steps of:
generating a reference signal at the desired center frequency with a reference generator;
providing the reference signal from the reference generator to the tunable bandpass filter;
providing a filter output signal from said tunable bandpass filter;
receiving the filter output signal in a digital signal processing and control processor connected to the tunable bandpass filter;
down converting the filter output signal into low-frequency in-phase and quadrature output with a low-frequency quadrature down converter tuned to a frequency below the desired center frequency;
down converting the filter output signal into high-frequency in-phase and quadrature outputs with a high-frequency quadrature down converter tuned to a frequency above the desired center frequency;
providing a low-frequency phase angle from a low-frequency phase measurement block connected to the low-frequency quadrature down converter;
providing a high-frequency phase angle a high-frequency phase measurement block connected to the high-frequency quadrature down converter;
comparing the low-frequency phase angle and the high-frequency phase angle and providing a difference angle in summing circuit;
removing a negative sign from the difference angle an absolute value function; and
providing a phase error metric from an integrate and dump circuit that integrates and dumps the difference angle value; and
tuning said tunable band pass filter with said digital signal processing and control processor to provide a desired phase error metric thereby tuning said tunable band pass filter to the desired center frequency.
5. The method of claim 4 wherein said digital signal processing and control processor further performs the step of storing tunable bandpass filter parameters for the desired center frequency.
6. The method of claim 5 wherein the steps of claim 5 are repeated for a second desired center frequency.
7. The method of claim 4 further comprising the step of switching the reference signal from the reference generator to the tunable bandpass filter with a switch.
8. An apparatus for tuning a tunable bandpass filter comprising:
a reference generator for generating a reference signal for use in tuning the tunable bandpass filter,
the tunable bandpass filter for receiving the reference signal and providing a filter output signal;
a digital signal processing and control processor connected to the tunable bandpass filter to receive the filter output signal and to tune said tunable bandpass filter to provide a desired phase error metric thereby tuning said tunable bandpass filter to the desired center frequency wherein said digital signal processing and control processor further comprises a phase comparison function comprising:
a low-frequency quadrature down converter tuned to a frequency below the desired center frequency to down convert the filter output signal into low-frequency in-phase and quadrature outputs:
a high-frequency quadrature down converter tuned to a frequency above the desired center frequency to down convert the filter output signal into high-frequency in-phase and quadrature outputs:
a low-frequency phase measurement block connected to the low-frequency quadrature down converter to provide a low-frequency phase angle from the low-frequency in-phase and quadrature outputs:
a high-frequency phase measurement block connected to the high-frequency quadrature down converter to provide a high-frequency phase angle from the high-frequency in-phase and quadrature outputs:
a summing circuit for comparing the low-frequency phase angle and the high-frequency phase angle and providing a difference angle;
an absolute value function for removing a negative sign from the difference angle; and
an integrate and dump circuit for integrating and dumping the difference angle value thereby providing the desired phase error metric.
9. The apparatus of claim 8 wherein said digital signal processing and control processor stores tunable filter parameters for the desired center frequency.
10. The apparatus of claim 8 wherein said desired phase error metric comprises one of a zero phase error metric, a minimum phase error metric, and a closest match phase error metric.
11. The radio having a tunable bandpass filter of claim 8 further comprising a switch for switching the reference signal from the reference generator to the tunable band pass filter.
US10/452,887 2003-06-02 2003-06-02 Method and apparatus for automatic center frequency tuning of tunable bandpass filters Expired - Lifetime US7039385B1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/452,887 US7039385B1 (en) 2003-06-02 2003-06-02 Method and apparatus for automatic center frequency tuning of tunable bandpass filters

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/452,887 US7039385B1 (en) 2003-06-02 2003-06-02 Method and apparatus for automatic center frequency tuning of tunable bandpass filters

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US7039385B1 true US7039385B1 (en) 2006-05-02

Family

ID=36216169

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/452,887 Expired - Lifetime US7039385B1 (en) 2003-06-02 2003-06-02 Method and apparatus for automatic center frequency tuning of tunable bandpass filters

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US7039385B1 (en)

Cited By (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20040257480A1 (en) * 2003-04-03 2004-12-23 Stmicroelectronics S.A. Electronic component allowing the decoding of digital terrestrial or cable television signals
US20040259512A1 (en) * 2003-04-11 2004-12-23 Stmicroelectronics S.A. Electronic component with integrated tuning device, allowing the decoding of digital terrestrial or cable television signals
US20040268396A1 (en) * 2003-04-01 2004-12-30 Stmicroelectronics S.A. Electronic component allowing the decoding of satellite digital television signals
US20050064843A1 (en) * 2003-09-19 2005-03-24 Koji Oiwa Digital tuner
US20070040616A1 (en) * 2003-11-05 2007-02-22 Takatoshi Kato Oscillator and radar apparatus using the same
US20070093224A1 (en) * 2005-10-26 2007-04-26 Tzero Technologies, Inc. Method and apparatus for calibrating filtering of a transceiver
WO2010018492A1 (en) * 2008-08-13 2010-02-18 Nxp B.V. Wide band transceiver and data receiving method using a tunable notch filter and pre-estimated optimal notch filter parameters
US20100130158A1 (en) * 2008-11-25 2010-05-27 Silicon Laboratories, Inc. Low-Cost Receiver Using Tracking Filter
US20100130155A1 (en) * 2008-11-25 2010-05-27 Silicon Laboratories, Inc. Low-Cost Receiver Using Tracking Bandpass Filter and Lowpass Filter
US7761067B1 (en) * 2003-05-15 2010-07-20 Marvell International Ltd. Iterative filter circuit calibration
US7796197B2 (en) 2003-04-11 2010-09-14 Stmicroelectronics S.A. Electronic component allowing the decoding of digital terrestrial or cable television signals
US20100244944A1 (en) * 2009-03-30 2010-09-30 Infineon Technologies Ag Phase Locked Loop-Based Tuning Adjustable Filter
US8494470B2 (en) 2008-11-25 2013-07-23 Silicon Laboratories Inc. Integrated receivers and integrated circuit having integrated inductors
US8725103B2 (en) 2012-01-03 2014-05-13 Silicon Laboratories Inc. Receiver including a tracking filter
US8983417B2 (en) 2012-01-03 2015-03-17 Silicon Laboratories Inc. Low-cost receiver using integrated inductors

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5949832A (en) * 1996-03-26 1999-09-07 Sicom, Inc. Digital receiver with tunable analog filter and method therefor
US6266522B1 (en) * 1998-02-04 2001-07-24 Ericsson Inc. Apparatus and methods for tuning bandpass filters
US6377788B1 (en) * 1997-05-09 2002-04-23 Micrel, Incorporated Tunable filter in radio receiver
US20020068541A1 (en) * 2000-12-04 2002-06-06 Petri Helio Method for tuning a filter
US6545559B2 (en) * 2000-02-23 2003-04-08 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Tuning method and system
US6781474B2 (en) * 2002-02-18 2004-08-24 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. Apparatus and method for tuning a filter

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5949832A (en) * 1996-03-26 1999-09-07 Sicom, Inc. Digital receiver with tunable analog filter and method therefor
US6377788B1 (en) * 1997-05-09 2002-04-23 Micrel, Incorporated Tunable filter in radio receiver
US6266522B1 (en) * 1998-02-04 2001-07-24 Ericsson Inc. Apparatus and methods for tuning bandpass filters
US6545559B2 (en) * 2000-02-23 2003-04-08 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Tuning method and system
US20020068541A1 (en) * 2000-12-04 2002-06-06 Petri Helio Method for tuning a filter
US6781474B2 (en) * 2002-02-18 2004-08-24 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. Apparatus and method for tuning a filter

Cited By (31)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7643634B2 (en) 2003-04-01 2010-01-05 Stmicroelectronics S.A. Electronic component allowing the decoding of satellite digital television signals
US20040268396A1 (en) * 2003-04-01 2004-12-30 Stmicroelectronics S.A. Electronic component allowing the decoding of satellite digital television signals
US20040257480A1 (en) * 2003-04-03 2004-12-23 Stmicroelectronics S.A. Electronic component allowing the decoding of digital terrestrial or cable television signals
US20040259512A1 (en) * 2003-04-11 2004-12-23 Stmicroelectronics S.A. Electronic component with integrated tuning device, allowing the decoding of digital terrestrial or cable television signals
US7796197B2 (en) 2003-04-11 2010-09-14 Stmicroelectronics S.A. Electronic component allowing the decoding of digital terrestrial or cable television signals
US7406304B2 (en) * 2003-04-11 2008-07-29 Stmicroelectronics S.A. Electronic component with integrated tuning device, allowing the decoding of digital terrestrial or cable television signals
US9031527B1 (en) * 2003-05-15 2015-05-12 Marvell International Ltd. Iterative filter circuit calibration
US7761067B1 (en) * 2003-05-15 2010-07-20 Marvell International Ltd. Iterative filter circuit calibration
US20050064843A1 (en) * 2003-09-19 2005-03-24 Koji Oiwa Digital tuner
US7177622B2 (en) * 2003-09-19 2007-02-13 Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha Digital tuner
US7355484B2 (en) * 2003-11-05 2008-04-08 Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Oscillator and radar apparatus using the same
US20070040616A1 (en) * 2003-11-05 2007-02-22 Takatoshi Kato Oscillator and radar apparatus using the same
US7437139B2 (en) * 2005-10-26 2008-10-14 Tzero Technologies, Inc. Method and apparatus for calibrating filtering of a transceiver
US20070093224A1 (en) * 2005-10-26 2007-04-26 Tzero Technologies, Inc. Method and apparatus for calibrating filtering of a transceiver
US20110206100A1 (en) * 2008-08-13 2011-08-25 Nxp B.V. Wide band transceiver and data receiving method using a tunable notch filter and pre-estimated optimal notch filter parameters
US8374210B2 (en) 2008-08-13 2013-02-12 Nxp B.V. Wide band transceiver and data receiving method using a tunable notch filter and pre-estimated optimal notch filter parameters
WO2010018492A1 (en) * 2008-08-13 2010-02-18 Nxp B.V. Wide band transceiver and data receiving method using a tunable notch filter and pre-estimated optimal notch filter parameters
US9219512B2 (en) 2008-11-25 2015-12-22 Silicon Laboratories Inc. Integrated receiver and integrated circuit having integrated inductors and method therefor
US8983419B2 (en) 2008-11-25 2015-03-17 Silicon Laboratories Inc. Integrated receiver and integrated circuit having integrated inductors and method therefor
US8145172B2 (en) * 2008-11-25 2012-03-27 Silicon Laboratories Inc. Low-cost receiver using tracking filter
US8145170B2 (en) 2008-11-25 2012-03-27 Silicon Laboratories Inc. Low-cost receiver using tracking bandpass filter and lowpass filter
US20100130155A1 (en) * 2008-11-25 2010-05-27 Silicon Laboratories, Inc. Low-Cost Receiver Using Tracking Bandpass Filter and Lowpass Filter
US8494470B2 (en) 2008-11-25 2013-07-23 Silicon Laboratories Inc. Integrated receivers and integrated circuit having integrated inductors
US8706069B2 (en) 2008-11-25 2014-04-22 Silicon Laboratories Inc. Integrated receivers and integrated circuit having integrated inductors
US20100130158A1 (en) * 2008-11-25 2010-05-27 Silicon Laboratories, Inc. Low-Cost Receiver Using Tracking Filter
US20100244944A1 (en) * 2009-03-30 2010-09-30 Infineon Technologies Ag Phase Locked Loop-Based Tuning Adjustable Filter
US7982547B2 (en) * 2009-03-30 2011-07-19 Infineon Technologies Ag Phase locked loop-based tuning adjustable filter
US8983417B2 (en) 2012-01-03 2015-03-17 Silicon Laboratories Inc. Low-cost receiver using integrated inductors
US8725103B2 (en) 2012-01-03 2014-05-13 Silicon Laboratories Inc. Receiver including a tracking filter
US9209838B2 (en) 2012-01-03 2015-12-08 Silicon Laboratories Inc. Low-cost receiver using integrated inductors
US9479199B2 (en) 2012-01-03 2016-10-25 Silicon Laboratories, Inc. Low-cost receiver using integrated inductors

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7039385B1 (en) Method and apparatus for automatic center frequency tuning of tunable bandpass filters
US6978125B2 (en) Methods and apparatus for tuning pre-selection filters in radio receivers
US7577413B2 (en) Method and apparatus for calibrating a filter of a receiver
EP0475705B1 (en) RF filter alignment using digital processor clock
US8750441B2 (en) Signal cancellation to reduce phase noise, period jitter, and other contamination in local oscillator, frequency timing, or other timing generators or signal sources
CN101405946B (en) RF receiver circuit and method for receiving RF signals and down converting to baseband
US6781474B2 (en) Apparatus and method for tuning a filter
EP0545342B1 (en) Method of calibrating a superheterodyne receiver
CA2280878C (en) An amplifier for continuous high gain, narrowband signal amplification
US20080166978A1 (en) Method and circuit for estimating in-phase/quadrature signal amplitude imbalance
US7155190B2 (en) DDS-PLL method for frequency sweep
US5991609A (en) Low cost digital automatic alignment method and apparatus
US6091943A (en) Combining oscillator with a phase-indexed control circuit for a radio receiver
US7509106B2 (en) Test signal generation circuit, and reception circuit
US7945218B1 (en) Method and system for tuning quality factor in high-Q, high-frequency filters
US6771943B2 (en) Image rejection
US7449945B2 (en) Phase demodulator and portable telephone apparatus
KR100518031B1 (en) Apparatus for the generation of calibration signal in receiver
CN118713690B (en) A device and method for improving the spectrum purity of a receiver
JP4599224B2 (en) Communication device
EP1380108A2 (en) Methods and apparatus for tuning pre-selection filters in radio receivers
EP1943738B1 (en) Calibration device and process with forward/backward mechanism for a band-pass filter.
JPS5834051B2 (en) electronic tuning device
JPH0254705B2 (en)
AU603216B2 (en) Tweet elimination, or reduction, in superheterodyne receivers

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: ROCKWELL COLLINS, INC., IOWA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:HOFFMANN, THEODORE J.;MULBROOK, MARK M.;REEL/FRAME:014147/0592

Effective date: 20030602

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4

SULP Surcharge for late payment
FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 8

MAFP Maintenance fee payment

Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 12TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1553)

Year of fee payment: 12

点击 这是indexloc提供的php浏览器服务,不要输入任何密码和下载