+

US6852980B2 - On-line DOI rebinning for LSO PET/SPECT spatial resolution - Google Patents

On-line DOI rebinning for LSO PET/SPECT spatial resolution Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US6852980B2
US6852980B2 US09/982,344 US98234401A US6852980B2 US 6852980 B2 US6852980 B2 US 6852980B2 US 98234401 A US98234401 A US 98234401A US 6852980 B2 US6852980 B2 US 6852980B2
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
rebinning
pet
resolution
head
doi
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime, expires
Application number
US09/982,344
Other versions
US20040069951A1 (en
Inventor
William F. Jones
Bernard Bendriem
Michael E. Casey
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Siemens Medical Solutions USA Inc
Original Assignee
CTI PET Systems Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by CTI PET Systems Inc filed Critical CTI PET Systems Inc
Priority to US09/982,344 priority Critical patent/US6852980B2/en
Assigned to CTI PET SYSTEMS, INC. reassignment CTI PET SYSTEMS, INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: BENDRIEM, BERNARD, JONES, WILLIAM F.
Publication of US20040069951A1 publication Critical patent/US20040069951A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US6852980B2 publication Critical patent/US6852980B2/en
Assigned to SIEMENS MEDICAL SOLUTIONS USA, INC. reassignment SIEMENS MEDICAL SOLUTIONS USA, INC. MERGER (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: CTI PET SYSTEMS, INC.
Adjusted expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01TMEASUREMENT OF NUCLEAR OR X-RADIATION
    • G01T1/00Measuring X-radiation, gamma radiation, corpuscular radiation, or cosmic radiation
    • G01T1/29Measurement performed on radiation beams, e.g. position or section of the beam; Measurement of spatial distribution of radiation
    • G01T1/2914Measurement of spatial distribution of radiation
    • G01T1/2985In depth localisation, e.g. using positron emitters; Tomographic imaging (longitudinal and transverse section imaging; apparatus for radiation diagnosis sequentially in different planes, steroscopic radiation diagnosis)
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61BDIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B6/00Apparatus or devices for radiation diagnosis; Apparatus or devices for radiation diagnosis combined with radiation therapy equipment
    • A61B6/02Arrangements for diagnosis sequentially in different planes; Stereoscopic radiation diagnosis
    • A61B6/03Computed tomography [CT]
    • A61B6/037Emission tomography
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61BDIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B6/00Apparatus or devices for radiation diagnosis; Apparatus or devices for radiation diagnosis combined with radiation therapy equipment
    • A61B6/52Devices using data or image processing specially adapted for radiation diagnosis
    • A61B6/5205Devices using data or image processing specially adapted for radiation diagnosis involving processing of raw data to produce diagnostic data

Definitions

  • This invention relates to the field of tomography devices. More specifically, the present invention relates to a method for using on-line depth-of-interaction (DOI) rebinning in an LSO PET/SPECT system to improve spatial resolution.
  • DOE depth-of-interaction
  • Detector systems with depth-of-interaction (DOI) capability for 3-D PET have been developed for tomographs by CTI/Siemens, Knoxville, Tenn. Both the HRRT & LSO PET/SPECT tomographs utilize state-of-the-art planar detector designs which feature a high ratio of scintillation crystals to photomultiplier tubes (PMT) permitting many crystals per planar array, effective dual-layer DOI by scintillation decay time, and potentially low manufacturing cost.
  • PMT photomultiplier tubes
  • the present invention provides a method and apparatus for on-line DOI rebinning for LSO PET/SPECT to improve spatial resolution.
  • the present method is useful in a hybrid Positron Emission Tomography (PET)/Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) system running in PET-mode to improve spatial resolution.
  • PET Positron Emission Tomography
  • SPECT Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography
  • the method is especially useful for such a system having a rotating dual-head tomograph using LSO/NaI scintillators and capable of depth-of-interaction (DOI) measurement.
  • DOI depth-of-interaction
  • each detector head in the PET/SPECT system contains two 84 ⁇ 120 planar arrays of crystals, the crystals in the first planar array being fabricated from a first scintillator material and the second planar array being fabricated from a second scintillator material.
  • each head is radially offset 36 cm from the field of view (FOV) center. Relative orientation of the two heads is 158 degrees.
  • Dual-level DOI discriminates between the two scintillator materials by scintillation pulse decay time. While significant for good image resolution, dual-level DOI isolates gamma detection only to the 1 cm long axis depth of each individual crystal.
  • Critical to delivery of excellent spatial resolution are additional methods to precisely characterize the depth of the centroid of the probability of gamma interaction along the long axis of the crystal.
  • the depth is measured to +/ ⁇ 0.01 cm for each of 4 planar arrays and applied for more accurate line of response (LOR) positioning in super-fast real-time rebinding hardware.
  • LOR line of response
  • the full width half maximum (FWHM) transaxial spatial resolution is 0.4 cm at the center of the FOV, and 0.6 cm at 10 cm off center.
  • the DOI discrimination improves resolution as much as fifty percent (50%). More specifically, without DOI discrimination, resolution can degrade by as much as thirty-three percent (33%).
  • Two rotating detector heads for use in PET mode are supported by a gantry.
  • a movable patient bed is provided for introducing the patient into and removing the patient from within the patient gantry.
  • Two planar detector arrays are served by an array of PMT's.
  • the dual layer planar detector head is comprised of a PMT array, a light guide, and the two layers of crystals in a light-tight container.
  • the light guide is disposed below the two layers of crystals and above the PMT array.
  • the data acquisition hardware includes a TAXI to Fibre Channel Adaptor card, or TFA, and a rebinner.
  • TFA feeds the detector pair coincidence event stream to the rebinner for on-line rebinning.
  • the bin address output stream from the rebinner feeds a Fibre Channel PCI DMA receiver card for direct PCI DMA stream transfers controlled by the computer system operator software.
  • the stream is useful for storage on disk or for on-line histogramming directly into PC DRAM.
  • Each of these components is carried on and in electrical communication with an embedded PC motherboard.
  • the rebinner circuit supports on-line real-time DOI LOR-to-projection-space nearest-neighbor rebinning. All DOI and gamma interaction centroid depth knowledge about LOR positioning is applied in real time.
  • Gamma centroid location measurements to ⁇ 0.01 cm are made by rastering assumed transaxial and radial head positions and the corresponding rebinning maps for optimal back-projected image resolution.
  • Four variables are used to define position rasterization. These variables represent the radial and transaxial offsets, or centroid positions, for each of the heads. During rasterization, the four variables are each stepped discretely through a chosen range, with all combinations of the parameters being tested.
  • the optimal positions, and thus the centroid locations, are found using the following process.
  • a 64-bit list mode file is collected once and read a multiple of times. The process is initiated by assuming a crystal position as the centroid for each of the heads. A sequence for varying the assumed positions is also defined at the outset. First, the indicated rebinning look up tables are made. Next, the list mode data is rebinned. The image is then histogrammed and reconstructed. Following this step, the image resolution is assessed. Next, the best resolution number and the associated trial position variables are recorded. These steps are then repeated on the next trial variable set. All FWHM resolution numbers are assessed from a conventional 2-D filtered back projection of the sinogram using a ramp filter with a 0.5 cutoff. In all applications, both image horizontal and vertical FWHM assessments are performed. Only the higher of the two FWHM is used for making decisions.
  • the four centroid locations are found using only LSO-LSO coincidence data.
  • the sequence involves the rasterization of the four variables compensated not only for detector physics but also for simple mechanical variation in the mounting of the detectors.
  • the NaI transaxial locations are assumed to be equivalent to the LSO case. Only the NaI radial locations remain to be determined. This determination requires a step-sequence with only one variable as opposed to four. Only LSO-NaI coincidence data is used for finding this fifth radial offset position.
  • the position variable is allowed to affect only the NaI end of each LOR.
  • the LSO end of each LOR use the four LSO-only position parameters as determined and fixed earlier.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates an LSO PET/SPECT device
  • FIG. 2 illustrates an enlarged cut-away view of the dual layer planar detector head used in the LSO PET/SPECT device of FIG. 1 ;
  • FIG. 3 illustrates one embodiment of the data acquisition hardware used in the method of the present invention
  • FIG. 4 illustrates a block diagram of the rebinner circuit incorporated in the data acquisition hardware illustrated in FIG. 3 ;
  • FIG. 5 illustrates a portion of the transaxial computation performed by one bank of the rebinner
  • FIG. 6 illustrates the four variables r A , t A , r B , t B used to define position rasterization
  • FIG. 7 is a schematic illustration of the process used to determine the optimal positions, and thus the centroid locations, of the detector banks
  • FIG. 8 illustrates a plot of found centroid locations as determined using the process depicted in FIG. 7 ;
  • FIGS. 9A-9C display the sinograms and optimized images from the on-line center needle data collection
  • FIGS. 10A-C illustrate the sinograms and images from the off-center needle data collection, the offset being 10 cm;
  • FIG. 11 illustrates various incident angles of gamma photons striking a detector array.
  • a method and apparatus for on-line DOI rebinning for LSO PET/SPECT to improve spatial resolution incorporating various features of the present invention is illustrated in the figures.
  • the present method is useful in a hybrid Positron Emission Tomography (PET)/Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) system running in PET-mode to improve spatial resolution.
  • PET Positron Emission Tomography
  • SPECT Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography
  • the method is especially useful for such a system having a rotating dual-head tomograph using LSO/NaI scintillators and capable of depth-of-interaction (DOI) measurement.
  • DOI depth-of-interaction
  • each detector head in the PET/SPECT system contains two 84 ⁇ 120 planar arrays of crystals.
  • the crystals in the first array are fabricated from NaI.
  • the crystals in the second array are fabricated from LSO.
  • each of the LSO and NaI crystals are 0.44 cm ⁇ 0.44 cm ⁇ 1 cm.
  • each head is radially offset 36 cm from the field of view (FOV) center. Relative orientation of the two heads is 158 degrees.
  • Dual-level DOI discriminates LSO versus NaI by scintillation pulse decay time. While significant for good image resolution, dual-level DOI isolates gamma detection only to the 1 cm long axis depth of each individual crystal. Critical to delivery of excellent spatial resolution are additional methods to precisely characterize the depth of the centroid of the probability of gamma interaction along the long axis of the crystal. The depth is measured to +/ ⁇ 0.01 cm for each of 4 planar arrays and applied for more accurate line of response (LOR) positioning in super-fast real-time rebinding hardware.
  • LOR line of response
  • the full width half maximum (FWHM) transaxial spatial resolution is 0.4 cm at the center of the FOV, and 0.6 cm at 10 cm off center.
  • the DOI discrimination improves resolution as much as fifty percent (50%). More specifically, without DOI discrimination, resolution can degrade by as much as thirty-three percent (33%).
  • FIG. 1 illustrates an LSO PET/SPECT device.
  • Two rotating detector heads for use in PET mode are supported by a gantry.
  • a movable patient bed is provided for introducing the patient into and removing the patient from within the patient gantry.
  • Two planar NaI/LSO detector arrays are served by an array of PMT'S, one array being comprised of NaI detectors and the other LSO detectors.
  • Each detector array is comprised of 84 ⁇ 120 detectors.
  • the PMT array is comprised of 8 ⁇ 11 PMT's.
  • the resulting cylindrical FOV within the gantry has a 55 cm diameter and is 37 cm long.
  • FIG. 2 illustrates an enlarged cut-away view of the dual layer planar detector head. Illustrated are the PMT array, a light guide, and the two layers of crystals in a light-tight container.
  • the next lower planar detector array is comprised of LSO crystals. Each of the LSO and NaI crystals are 0.44 ⁇ 0.44 ⁇ 1 cm.
  • the light guide is disposed below the LSO detector array. In the preferred embodiment the light guide is fabricated from plastic.
  • the PMT array is disposed below the light guide.
  • FIG. 3 illustrates one embodiment of the data acquisition hardware.
  • the PET coincidence stream is processed successively through two custom PC cards.
  • the two cards depicted include a TAXI to Fibre Channel Adaptor card, or TFA, and a rebinner.
  • TFA feeds the detector pair coincidence event stream to the rebinner for on-line rebinning.
  • the bin address output stream from the rebinner feeds a Fibre Channel PCI DMA receiver card for direct PCI DMA stream transfers controlled by the computer system operator software.
  • the stream is useful for storage on disk or for on-line histogramming directly into PC DRAM.
  • Each of these components is carried on and in electrical communication with an embedded PC motherboard.
  • FIG. 4 illustrates a block diagram of the rebinner circuit, which supports on-line real-time DOI LOR-to-projection-space nearest-neighbor rebinning. All DOI and gamma interaction centroid depth knowledge about LOR positioning is applied in real time by this design.
  • FIG. 5 Illustrated in FIG. 5 is a portion of the transaxial computation performed by one bank of the rebinner.
  • a transaxial slice view of the PET/SPECT FOV with the detectors from heads A and B is shown, with the detector event occurring along a line between one detector (x A , y A ) in head A and another detector (x B , y B ) in head B.
  • FIG. 6 illustrates the four variables r A , t A , r B , t B used to define position rasterization. These variables represent the radial and transaxial offsets, or centroid positions, for each of the heads A and B, respectively. It will be noted that at least the tilting angle of the head is variable, although in the E.CAM gantry, such has not proven necessary for measurement and correction.
  • the four variables r A , t A , r B , t B are each stepped discretely through a chosen range, with all combinations of the parameters being tested.
  • a 64-bit list mode file is collected once and read a multiple of times. The process is initiated by assuming a crystal position as the centroid for each of the heads A,B.
  • a sequence for varying the assumed positions is also defined at the outset. For example, stepping through a 1 mm range in 0.1 mm steps, the steps in the sequence may be as follows. First, the indicated rebinning look up tables are made. Next, the list mode data is rebinned. The image is then histogrammed and reconstructed. Following this step, the image resolution is assessed. Next, the best resolution number and the associated trial position variables are recorded. These steps are then repeated on the next trial variable set.
  • the four centroid locations are found using only LSO-LSO coincidence data.
  • the sequence involves the rasterization of the four variables compensated not only for detector physics but also for simple mechanical variation in the mounting of the detectors.
  • the NaI transaxial locations are assumed to be equivalent to the LSO case. Only the NaI radial locations remain to be determined. This determination requires a step-sequence with only one variable as opposed to four. Both head A and head B radial NaI offsets are assumed to vary equally, thus avoiding the need for two radial variables. Only LSO-NaI coincidence data is used for finding this fifth radial offset position.
  • the position variable is allowed to affect only the NaI end of each LOR.
  • the LSO end of each LOR use the four LSO-only position parameters as determined and fixed earlier.
  • needle activity ( 68 Ge/Ga) was contained within a 0.16 cm I.D. stainless steel tube and oriented parallel to the axis of the FOV. All data collected were in 64-bit detector-pair list-mode data format from a single 2-D plane (plane 80 of 167, segment 0, span 7). Coincidence time resolution was set up to 10 ns. Energy thresholds were set to 400 & 650 keV. All data was nearest-neighbor rebinned into a 256 ⁇ 256 sinogram with 0.2145 cm transaxial bin pitch by software which accurately emulates the rebinner card.
  • FIG. 8 illustrates a plot of found centroid locations.
  • the plot illustrates transaxial resolution versus transaxial and radial head position for LSO-LSO coincidences of a centered needle. Using only LSO-LSO coincidences, a few hundred trial positions were sequenced using software to implement the sequence of FIG. 7 .
  • FIG. 8 shows the impact on image resolution as 2 parameters of head A are sequenced optimally, one parameter at a time. As the assumed transaxial and radial position of head A varies through a 0.09 cm range in 0.01 cm steps, the impact on image resolution is shown.
  • the upper, transaxial plot shows the resolution ranging from 0.53 cm to the optimal 0.39 cm as the assumed head A position is moved transaxially.
  • the lower, radial plot shows the resolution ranging from 0.46 cm to the optimal 0.39 cm as the assumed head position is moved radially. As the assumed transaxial position of head A changes only by 0.03 cm, the resolution improves by over 20%, from 0.53 cm to 0.39 cm.
  • FIGS. 9A-9C display the sinograms and optimized images from the on-line center needle data collection. LSO-LSO coincidence data was used exclusively.
  • FIG. 9A is a 256 ⁇ 256 sinogram resulting from the optimal placement of the gamma centroid locations.
  • FIG. 9B is a 128 ⁇ 128 back-projection of the sinogram shown in FIG. 9A. A zoom of 10 was used in reconstruction along with a ramp filter with 0.5 cutoff. The profile FWHM is 0.39 cm.
  • FIG. 9C is a back-projection of the sinogram shown in FIG. 9A , similar to the image of FIG. 9B , except with the intensity gray scale set to saturate above 10% to show background structure.
  • FIGS. 10A-C illustrate the sinograms and images from the off-center needle data collection, the offset being 10 cm. These images use the centroid locations determined by the data shown in FIGS. 9A-9C . As in FIGS. 9A-9C , LSO-LSO coincidence data was used exclusively.
  • FIG. 10A is a 256 ⁇ 256 sinogram resulting from the needle placement at 10 cm below FOV center. Optimal gamma centroid locations were determined by the on-center data used in the sinograms of FIGS. 9A-9C .
  • FIG. 10B is a 128 ⁇ 128 back-projection of the sinogram shown in FIG. 10A. A zoom of 10 was used in reconstruction along with a ramp filter with 0.5 cutoff and a 10 cm offset. The profile FWHM is 0.57 cm.
  • FIG. 10C is a back-projection of the sinogram shown in FIG. 10A , similar to the image of FIG. 10B , except with the intensity gray scale set to saturate above 10% to show background
  • FIG. 11 illustrates the incident angle parameter.
  • gamma photons arrive at the detector array through a range of incident angles. Shown are angles of 15°, 30° and 45°. With each of these angles is shown a detection probability profile for the indicated crystal, each profile having a centroid. As each centroid intersects the crystal long axis at a different point, custom hardware applies such LOR position refinements in real time. As discussed above, a single centroid position is determined for each crystal in a planar array. In this concept extension for incident angle optimization, separate gamma interaction centroid locations are found for each incident angle range. Once the optimal locations are found, real-time application of the centroid location is performed in the rebinner. To this extent, list-mode data is grouped into incident angle subsets, after which rasterization is performed.
  • the LSO PET/SPECT device and method as described in the illustrated example has proven to achieve excellent 0.4 cm transaxial spatial resolution with effective on-line DOI rebinning capability at the center of the FOV and 0.6 cm transaxial spatial resolution with effective on-line DOI rebinning capability at 10 cm off center of the FOV.

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Medical Informatics (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • High Energy & Nuclear Physics (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
  • Optics & Photonics (AREA)
  • Pathology (AREA)
  • Radiology & Medical Imaging (AREA)
  • Biophysics (AREA)
  • Heart & Thoracic Surgery (AREA)
  • Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
  • Surgery (AREA)
  • Nuclear Medicine, Radiotherapy & Molecular Imaging (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Spectroscopy & Molecular Physics (AREA)
  • Nuclear Medicine (AREA)
  • Measurement Of Radiation (AREA)

Abstract

A method and apparatus for on-line DOI rebinning for LSO PET/SPECT to improve spatial resolution, for use in a hybrid Positron Emission Tomography (PET)/Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) system running in PET-mode. Data acquisition hardware is used to feed a detector pair coincidence event stream to an on-line rebinner. Gamma centroid location measurements are made by rastering assumed transaxial and radial head positions and the corresponding rebinning maps for optimal back-projected image resolution. Optimal positions are found by collecting a 64-bit list mode file, assuming a crystal position as the centroid for each of the heads, defining a sequence for varying the assumed positions, making the rebinning look-up tables, rebinning the list mode data, histogramming and reconstructing the image, assessing the image resolution, recording the best resolution number and the associated trial position variables, repeating these on the next trial variable set.

Description

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/241,400, filed Oct. 18, 2000.
STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT
Not Applicable.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of Invention
This invention relates to the field of tomography devices. More specifically, the present invention relates to a method for using on-line depth-of-interaction (DOI) rebinning in an LSO PET/SPECT system to improve spatial resolution.
2. Description of the Related Art
Detector systems with depth-of-interaction (DOI) capability for 3-D PET have been developed for tomographs by CTI/Siemens, Knoxville, Tenn. Both the HRRT & LSO PET/SPECT tomographs utilize state-of-the-art planar detector designs which feature a high ratio of scintillation crystals to photomultiplier tubes (PMT) permitting many crystals per planar array, effective dual-layer DOI by scintillation decay time, and potentially low manufacturing cost.
BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention provides a method and apparatus for on-line DOI rebinning for LSO PET/SPECT to improve spatial resolution. The present method is useful in a hybrid Positron Emission Tomography (PET)/Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) system running in PET-mode to improve spatial resolution. The method is especially useful for such a system having a rotating dual-head tomograph using LSO/NaI scintillators and capable of depth-of-interaction (DOI) measurement.
In the preferred embodiment, each detector head in the PET/SPECT system contains two 84×120 planar arrays of crystals, the crystals in the first planar array being fabricated from a first scintillator material and the second planar array being fabricated from a second scintillator material. In PET mode, each head is radially offset 36 cm from the field of view (FOV) center. Relative orientation of the two heads is 158 degrees. Dual-level DOI discriminates between the two scintillator materials by scintillation pulse decay time. While significant for good image resolution, dual-level DOI isolates gamma detection only to the 1 cm long axis depth of each individual crystal. Critical to delivery of excellent spatial resolution are additional methods to precisely characterize the depth of the centroid of the probability of gamma interaction along the long axis of the crystal. The depth is measured to +/−0.01 cm for each of 4 planar arrays and applied for more accurate line of response (LOR) positioning in super-fast real-time rebinding hardware. With DOI and measured centroid depth applied, the full width half maximum (FWHM) transaxial spatial resolution is 0.4 cm at the center of the FOV, and 0.6 cm at 10 cm off center. The DOI discrimination improves resolution as much as fifty percent (50%). More specifically, without DOI discrimination, resolution can degrade by as much as thirty-three percent (33%).
Two rotating detector heads for use in PET mode are supported by a gantry. A movable patient bed is provided for introducing the patient into and removing the patient from within the patient gantry. Two planar detector arrays are served by an array of PMT's. The dual layer planar detector head is comprised of a PMT array, a light guide, and the two layers of crystals in a light-tight container. The light guide is disposed below the two layers of crystals and above the PMT array.
The data acquisition hardware includes a TAXI to Fibre Channel Adaptor card, or TFA, and a rebinner. The TFA feeds the detector pair coincidence event stream to the rebinner for on-line rebinning. The bin address output stream from the rebinner feeds a Fibre Channel PCI DMA receiver card for direct PCI DMA stream transfers controlled by the computer system operator software. The stream is useful for storage on disk or for on-line histogramming directly into PC DRAM. Each of these components is carried on and in electrical communication with an embedded PC motherboard. The rebinner circuit supports on-line real-time DOI LOR-to-projection-space nearest-neighbor rebinning. All DOI and gamma interaction centroid depth knowledge about LOR positioning is applied in real time.
Gamma centroid location measurements to ±0.01 cm are made by rastering assumed transaxial and radial head positions and the corresponding rebinning maps for optimal back-projected image resolution. Four variables are used to define position rasterization. These variables represent the radial and transaxial offsets, or centroid positions, for each of the heads. During rasterization, the four variables are each stepped discretely through a chosen range, with all combinations of the parameters being tested.
The optimal positions, and thus the centroid locations, are found using the following process. A 64-bit list mode file is collected once and read a multiple of times. The process is initiated by assuming a crystal position as the centroid for each of the heads. A sequence for varying the assumed positions is also defined at the outset. First, the indicated rebinning look up tables are made. Next, the list mode data is rebinned. The image is then histogrammed and reconstructed. Following this step, the image resolution is assessed. Next, the best resolution number and the associated trial position variables are recorded. These steps are then repeated on the next trial variable set. All FWHM resolution numbers are assessed from a conventional 2-D filtered back projection of the sinogram using a ramp filter with a 0.5 cutoff. In all applications, both image horizontal and vertical FWHM assessments are performed. Only the higher of the two FWHM is used for making decisions.
Initially, the four centroid locations are found using only LSO-LSO coincidence data. The sequence involves the rasterization of the four variables compensated not only for detector physics but also for simple mechanical variation in the mounting of the detectors. Once the centroid positions for the LSO crystals are known, a simpler problem remains for finding the NaI centroid locations. The NaI transaxial locations are assumed to be equivalent to the LSO case. Only the NaI radial locations remain to be determined. This determination requires a step-sequence with only one variable as opposed to four. Only LSO-NaI coincidence data is used for finding this fifth radial offset position. During rasterization, the position variable is allowed to affect only the NaI end of each LOR. The LSO end of each LOR use the four LSO-only position parameters as determined and fixed earlier.
To this point, rasterization has been performed on data collected with the needle source positioned very close to the FOV center. Once these five position parameters (four for LSO crystals and one for NaI crystals) are determined, the final rebinning look-up table is defined. This look-up table is then applied for general use, including for LOR which do not serve the FOV center.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS
The above mentioned features of the invention will become more clearly understood from the following detailed description of the invention read together with the drawings in which:
FIG. 1 illustrates an LSO PET/SPECT device;
FIG. 2 illustrates an enlarged cut-away view of the dual layer planar detector head used in the LSO PET/SPECT device of FIG. 1;
FIG. 3 illustrates one embodiment of the data acquisition hardware used in the method of the present invention;
FIG. 4 illustrates a block diagram of the rebinner circuit incorporated in the data acquisition hardware illustrated in FIG. 3;
FIG. 5 illustrates a portion of the transaxial computation performed by one bank of the rebinner;
FIG. 6 illustrates the four variables rA, tA, rB, tB used to define position rasterization;
FIG. 7 is a schematic illustration of the process used to determine the optimal positions, and thus the centroid locations, of the detector banks;
FIG. 8 illustrates a plot of found centroid locations as determined using the process depicted in FIG. 7;
FIGS. 9A-9C display the sinograms and optimized images from the on-line center needle data collection;
FIGS. 10A-C illustrate the sinograms and images from the off-center needle data collection, the offset being 10 cm; and
FIG. 11 illustrates various incident angles of gamma photons striking a detector array.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
A method and apparatus for on-line DOI rebinning for LSO PET/SPECT to improve spatial resolution incorporating various features of the present invention is illustrated in the figures. The present method is useful in a hybrid Positron Emission Tomography (PET)/Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) system running in PET-mode to improve spatial resolution. The method is especially useful for such a system having a rotating dual-head tomograph using LSO/NaI scintillators and capable of depth-of-interaction (DOI) measurement.
In the preferred embodiment, each detector head in the PET/SPECT system contains two 84×120 planar arrays of crystals. The crystals in the first array are fabricated from NaI. The crystals in the second array are fabricated from LSO. In one embodiment, each of the LSO and NaI crystals are 0.44 cm×0.44 cm×1 cm.
In PET mode, each head is radially offset 36 cm from the field of view (FOV) center. Relative orientation of the two heads is 158 degrees. Dual-level DOI discriminates LSO versus NaI by scintillation pulse decay time. While significant for good image resolution, dual-level DOI isolates gamma detection only to the 1 cm long axis depth of each individual crystal. Critical to delivery of excellent spatial resolution are additional methods to precisely characterize the depth of the centroid of the probability of gamma interaction along the long axis of the crystal. The depth is measured to +/−0.01 cm for each of 4 planar arrays and applied for more accurate line of response (LOR) positioning in super-fast real-time rebinding hardware. With DOI and measured centroid depth applied, the full width half maximum (FWHM) transaxial spatial resolution is 0.4 cm at the center of the FOV, and 0.6 cm at 10 cm off center. The DOI discrimination improves resolution as much as fifty percent (50%). More specifically, without DOI discrimination, resolution can degrade by as much as thirty-three percent (33%).
FIG. 1 illustrates an LSO PET/SPECT device. Two rotating detector heads for use in PET mode are supported by a gantry. A movable patient bed is provided for introducing the patient into and removing the patient from within the patient gantry. Two planar NaI/LSO detector arrays are served by an array of PMT'S, one array being comprised of NaI detectors and the other LSO detectors. Each detector array is comprised of 84×120 detectors. The PMT array is comprised of 8×11 PMT's. The resulting cylindrical FOV within the gantry has a 55 cm diameter and is 37 cm long.
FIG. 2 illustrates an enlarged cut-away view of the dual layer planar detector head. Illustrated are the PMT array, a light guide, and the two layers of crystals in a light-tight container. The upper most planar detector array, closest to the center of the FOV, is comprised of NaI crystals. The next lower planar detector array is comprised of LSO crystals. Each of the LSO and NaI crystals are 0.44×0.44×1 cm. The light guide is disposed below the LSO detector array. In the preferred embodiment the light guide is fabricated from plastic. The PMT array is disposed below the light guide.
FIG. 3 illustrates one embodiment of the data acquisition hardware. In the data acquisition hardware of the preferred embodiment for use with PET/SPECT with LSO scintillators, the PET coincidence stream is processed successively through two custom PC cards. Of course, it will be understood that other alternative architecture may be used as well. The two cards depicted include a TAXI to Fibre Channel Adaptor card, or TFA, and a rebinner. The TFA feeds the detector pair coincidence event stream to the rebinner for on-line rebinning. The bin address output stream from the rebinner feeds a Fibre Channel PCI DMA receiver card for direct PCI DMA stream transfers controlled by the computer system operator software. The stream is useful for storage on disk or for on-line histogramming directly into PC DRAM. Each of these components is carried on and in electrical communication with an embedded PC motherboard.
FIG. 4 illustrates a block diagram of the rebinner circuit, which supports on-line real-time DOI LOR-to-projection-space nearest-neighbor rebinning. All DOI and gamma interaction centroid depth knowledge about LOR positioning is applied in real time by this design.
Illustrated in FIG. 5 is a portion of the transaxial computation performed by one bank of the rebinner. A transaxial slice view of the PET/SPECT FOV with the detectors from heads A and B is shown, with the detector event occurring along a line between one detector (xA, yA) in head A and another detector (xB, yB) in head B. The sinogram angle sa is determined by the equation: sa = tan - 1 [ y b - y a x b - x a ] , ( 1 )
and where the radial offset ro is determined by the equation:
ro=√{square root over ((x a 2 +y a 2))}*sin(tan−1(y a /x a)−sa)  (2)
Gamma centroid location measurements to ±0.01 cm are made by rastering assumed transaxial and radial head positions and the corresponding rebinning maps for optimal back-projected image resolution. FIG. 6 illustrates the four variables rA, tA, rB, tB used to define position rasterization. These variables represent the radial and transaxial offsets, or centroid positions, for each of the heads A and B, respectively. It will be noted that at least the tilting angle of the head is variable, although in the E.CAM gantry, such has not proven necessary for measurement and correction. During rasterization, the four variables rA, tA, rB, tB are each stepped discretely through a chosen range, with all combinations of the parameters being tested.
The optimal positions, and thus the centroid locations, are found using the process depicted in FIG. 7. A 64-bit list mode file is collected once and read a multiple of times. The process is initiated by assuming a crystal position as the centroid for each of the heads A,B. A sequence for varying the assumed positions is also defined at the outset. For example, stepping through a 1 mm range in 0.1 mm steps, the steps in the sequence may be as follows. First, the indicated rebinning look up tables are made. Next, the list mode data is rebinned. The image is then histogrammed and reconstructed. Following this step, the image resolution is assessed. Next, the best resolution number and the associated trial position variables are recorded. These steps are then repeated on the next trial variable set. All FWHM resolution numbers are assessed from a conventional 2-D filtered back projection of the sinogram using a ramp filter with a 0.5 cutoff. In all applications, both image horizontal and vertical FWHM assessments are performed. Only the higher of the two FWHM is used for making decisions.
Initially, the four centroid locations are found using only LSO-LSO coincidence data. The sequence involves the rasterization of the four variables compensated not only for detector physics but also for simple mechanical variation in the mounting of the detectors. Once the centroid positions for the LSO crystals are known, a simpler problem remains for finding the NaI centroid locations. The NaI transaxial locations are assumed to be equivalent to the LSO case. Only the NaI radial locations remain to be determined. This determination requires a step-sequence with only one variable as opposed to four. Both head A and head B radial NaI offsets are assumed to vary equally, thus avoiding the need for two radial variables. Only LSO-NaI coincidence data is used for finding this fifth radial offset position. During rasterization, which is a step-sequence as described, the position variable is allowed to affect only the NaI end of each LOR. The LSO end of each LOR use the four LSO-only position parameters as determined and fixed earlier.
To this point, rasterization has been performed on data collected with the needle source positioned very close to the FOV center. Once these five position parameters (four for LSO crystals and one for NaI crystals) are determined, the final rebinning look-up table is defined. This look-up table is then applied for general use, including for LOR which do not serve the FOV center.
In one application of the present invention, needle activity (68Ge/Ga) was contained within a 0.16 cm I.D. stainless steel tube and oriented parallel to the axis of the FOV. All data collected were in 64-bit detector-pair list-mode data format from a single 2-D plane (plane 80 of 167, segment 0, span 7). Coincidence time resolution was set up to 10 ns. Energy thresholds were set to 400 & 650 keV. All data was nearest-neighbor rebinned into a 256×256 sinogram with 0.2145 cm transaxial bin pitch by software which accurately emulates the rebinner card. Gamma centroid measurements to +/−0.01 cm were made by rastering assumed radial head positions and the corresponding rebinding maps for optimal back-projected image resolution. All FWHM resolution numbers were assessed from a conventional filtered back projection of the sinogram using a ramp filter with a 0.5 cutoff. In each case, both image horizontal and vertical FWHM assessments were performed. The tables below report the larger of those two resolution numbers. In Table 1 are the on-center transaxial FWHM spatial resolution results for LSO PET/SPECT in PET mode. In Table 2 are the 10 cm off-center results. In each of these tables, “ALL” means all LSO-LSO, LSO-NaI, Nai-LSO, and NaI-NaI coincidence events.
TABLE 1
PET Mode On-Center Transaxial FWHM Spatial Resolution
Coincidence Type FWHM (cm) % Total Trues
LSO-LSO (only) 0.39 60
ALL 0.42 100
ALL (DOI disabled) 0.52 100
TABLE 2
PET Mode Off-Center (10 cm) Transaxial FWHM Spatial Resolution
Coincidence Type FWHM (cm) % Total Trues
LSO-LSO (only) 0.57 60
ALL 0.59 100
ALL (DCI disabled) 0.70 100
FIG. 8 illustrates a plot of found centroid locations. The plot illustrates transaxial resolution versus transaxial and radial head position for LSO-LSO coincidences of a centered needle. Using only LSO-LSO coincidences, a few hundred trial positions were sequenced using software to implement the sequence of FIG. 7. Because of the difficulty in depicting a 4-dimensional space, FIG. 8 shows the impact on image resolution as 2 parameters of head A are sequenced optimally, one parameter at a time. As the assumed transaxial and radial position of head A varies through a 0.09 cm range in 0.01 cm steps, the impact on image resolution is shown. The upper, transaxial plot shows the resolution ranging from 0.53 cm to the optimal 0.39 cm as the assumed head A position is moved transaxially. The lower, radial plot shows the resolution ranging from 0.46 cm to the optimal 0.39 cm as the assumed head position is moved radially. As the assumed transaxial position of head A changes only by 0.03 cm, the resolution improves by over 20%, from 0.53 cm to 0.39 cm.
FIGS. 9A-9C display the sinograms and optimized images from the on-line center needle data collection. LSO-LSO coincidence data was used exclusively. FIG. 9A is a 256×256 sinogram resulting from the optimal placement of the gamma centroid locations. FIG. 9B is a 128×128 back-projection of the sinogram shown in FIG. 9A. A zoom of 10 was used in reconstruction along with a ramp filter with 0.5 cutoff. The profile FWHM is 0.39 cm. FIG. 9C is a back-projection of the sinogram shown in FIG. 9A, similar to the image of FIG. 9B, except with the intensity gray scale set to saturate above 10% to show background structure.
FIGS. 10A-C illustrate the sinograms and images from the off-center needle data collection, the offset being 10 cm. These images use the centroid locations determined by the data shown in FIGS. 9A-9C. As in FIGS. 9A-9C, LSO-LSO coincidence data was used exclusively. FIG. 10A is a 256×256 sinogram resulting from the needle placement at 10 cm below FOV center. Optimal gamma centroid locations were determined by the on-center data used in the sinograms of FIGS. 9A-9C. FIG. 10B is a 128×128 back-projection of the sinogram shown in FIG. 10A. A zoom of 10 was used in reconstruction along with a ramp filter with 0.5 cutoff and a 10 cm offset. The profile FWHM is 0.57 cm. FIG. 10C is a back-projection of the sinogram shown in FIG. 10A, similar to the image of FIG. 10B, except with the intensity gray scale set to saturate above 10% to show background structure.
Image resolution is further improved by assessing the centroid locations as a function of gamma incident angles. FIG. 11 illustrates the incident angle parameter. In this illustration, gamma photons arrive at the detector array through a range of incident angles. Shown are angles of 15°, 30° and 45°. With each of these angles is shown a detection probability profile for the indicated crystal, each profile having a centroid. As each centroid intersects the crystal long axis at a different point, custom hardware applies such LOR position refinements in real time. As discussed above, a single centroid position is determined for each crystal in a planar array. In this concept extension for incident angle optimization, separate gamma interaction centroid locations are found for each incident angle range. Once the optimal locations are found, real-time application of the centroid location is performed in the rebinner. To this extent, list-mode data is grouped into incident angle subsets, after which rasterization is performed.
The LSO PET/SPECT device and method as described in the illustrated example has proven to achieve excellent 0.4 cm transaxial spatial resolution with effective on-line DOI rebinning capability at the center of the FOV and 0.6 cm transaxial spatial resolution with effective on-line DOI rebinning capability at 10 cm off center of the FOV.
From the foregoing description, it will be recognized by those skilled in the art that a method and apparatus for on-line DOI rebinning for LSO PET/SPECT to improve spatial resolution offering advantages over the prior art has been provided. Specifically, the present method and apparatus are useful in a hybrid PET/SPECT system running in PET-mode, and especially for such a system having a rotating dual-head tomograph using LSO/NaI scintillators and capable of depth-of-interaction measurement.
While a preferred embodiment has been shown and described, it will be understood that it is not intended to limit the disclosure, but rather it is intended to cover all modifications and alternate methods falling within the spirit and the scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims.

Claims (10)

1. A method for improving spatial resolution using on-line depth-of-interaction (DOI) rebinning in a hybrid Positron Emission Tomography (PET)/Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) system running in PET-mode, the PET/SPECT system having a rotating dual-head tomograph using LSO/NaI scintillators and being capable of depth-of-interaction (DOI) measurement, the tomograph defining a field of view (FOV) within a patient gantry, said method comprising the steps of:
(a) acquiring a PET coincidence data stream from a patient scan;
(b) delivering the PET coincidence data stream to an on-line rebinner to derive a bin address output stream;
(c) deriving a bin address output stream in said on-line rebinner from said PET coincidence data stream;
(d) delivering the bin address output stream from the rebinner to a Fibre Channel PCI DMA receiver card for direct PCI DMA stream transfers;
(e) histogramming the bin address output stream; and
(f) storing said bin address output stream.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein said on-line rebinner is integrated within a rebinner circuitry which supports on-line real-time DOI line of response (LOR)-to-projection-space nearest-neighbor rebinning, and wherein DOI and gamma interaction centroid depth knowledge about LOR positioning is applied in real time.
3. The method of claim 1 wherein said step of deriving said bin address output stream includes performing a transaxial computation to determine at least a sinogram angle and a radial offset of a coincidence event between a first detector having coordinates (xA, yA) of a first detector head and a second detector having coordinates (xB, yB) of a second detector head, wherein said sinogram angle is determined by the equation: sa = tan - 1 [ y b - y a x b - x a ] ,
and where said radial offset is determined by the equation:

ro=√{square root over ((x a 2 +y a 2))}* sin(tan−1(y a /x a)−sa).
4. The method of claim 1 further comprising the step of measuring a Gamma centroid location including the steps of:
(1) rastering assumed transaxial and radial head positions and a corresponding rebinning map for optimal back-projected image resolution, said step rastering using variables rA, tA, rB, tB to represent radial and transaxial offsets for each head of the dual-head tomograph; and
(2) stepping the values for rA, tA, rB, tB discretely through a chosen range, with all combinations of the variables being tested.
5. The method of claim 1 further comprising the step of finding an optimal position of each head of the dual-head tomograph including the steps of:
(1) collecting a 64-bit list mode file;
(2) assuming a crystal position as the centroid for each head; and
(3) defining a sequence for varying the assumed crystal positions.
6. The method of claim 5 wherein said sequence for varying the assumed crystal positions includes the steps of:
(i) making at least one rebinning look up table;
(ii) rebinning list mode data;
(iii) histogramming and reconstructing the image;
(iv) assessing image resolution using Full Width Half Maximum (FWHM) resolution;
(v) recording a best resolution number and an associated trial position variable; and
(vi) repeating said steps of rebinning list mode data through said step of recording a best resolution number and an associated trial position variable on a subsequent trial variable set.
7. The method of claim 6, in said step of assessing image resolution, wherein all FWHM resolution numbers are assessed from a conventional 2-D filtered back projection of the sinogram using a ramp filter with a 0.5 cutoff.
8. The method of claim 6, in said step of assessing image resolution, wherein both image horizontal and vertical FWHM assessments are performed.
9. The method of claim 6 further comprising the step of defining a final rebinning look-up table to be applied for general use, including for LOR which do not serve the FOV center.
10. A method for improving spatial resolution using on-line depth-of-interaction (DOI) rebinning in a hybrid Positron Emission Tomography (PET)/Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) system running in PET-mode, the PET/SPECT system having a rotating dual-head tomograph using LSO/NaI scintillators and being capable of depth-of-interaction (DOI) measurement, the tomograph defining a field of view (FOV) within a patient gantry, said method comprising the step of:
finding multiple gamma interaction centroid locations which are unique for different line of response (LOR) incident angles.
US09/982,344 2000-10-18 2001-10-18 On-line DOI rebinning for LSO PET/SPECT spatial resolution Expired - Lifetime US6852980B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09/982,344 US6852980B2 (en) 2000-10-18 2001-10-18 On-line DOI rebinning for LSO PET/SPECT spatial resolution

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US24140000P 2000-10-18 2000-10-18
US09/982,344 US6852980B2 (en) 2000-10-18 2001-10-18 On-line DOI rebinning for LSO PET/SPECT spatial resolution

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20040069951A1 US20040069951A1 (en) 2004-04-15
US6852980B2 true US6852980B2 (en) 2005-02-08

Family

ID=32072824

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/982,344 Expired - Lifetime US6852980B2 (en) 2000-10-18 2001-10-18 On-line DOI rebinning for LSO PET/SPECT spatial resolution

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US6852980B2 (en)

Cited By (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20040026620A1 (en) * 2002-08-12 2004-02-12 William Peter Mission-specific positron emission tomography
US20050068570A1 (en) * 2003-09-25 2005-03-31 Hart Peter E. Printer user interface
WO2007084771A3 (en) * 2006-01-20 2008-07-10 Seno Medical Instr Inc Quantitative optoacoustic tomography with enhanced contrast
US20110072967A1 (en) * 2009-09-30 2011-03-31 Wood Willard E Packaging Material Such as Film, Fiber, Woven and Nonwoven Fabric with Adsorbancy
CN104217447A (en) * 2013-06-04 2014-12-17 上海联影医疗科技有限公司 Method for reconstructing PET (Positron Emission Tomography) image and medical imaging system
US10975300B2 (en) 2019-08-21 2021-04-13 Meishan Boya Advanced Materials Co., Ltd. Methods and devices for growing scintillation crystals with short decay time
US11054534B1 (en) 2020-04-24 2021-07-06 Ronald Nutt Time-resolved positron emission tomography encoder system for producing real-time, high resolution, three dimensional positron emission tomographic image without the necessity of performing image reconstruction
US11300695B2 (en) 2020-04-24 2022-04-12 Ronald Nutt Time-resolved positron emission tomography encoder system for producing event-by-event, real-time, high resolution, three-dimensional positron emission tomographic image without the necessity of performing image reconstruction
US11827826B2 (en) 2019-08-21 2023-11-28 Meishan Boya Advanced Materials Co., Ltd. Methods and devices for growing scintillation crystals

Families Citing this family (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7127096B2 (en) * 2001-11-20 2006-10-24 Accuimage Diagnostics Corp. Method and software for improving coronary calcium scoring consistency
US7149331B1 (en) 2002-09-03 2006-12-12 Cedara Software Corp. Methods and software for improving thresholding of coronary calcium scoring
US7583777B2 (en) * 2004-07-21 2009-09-01 General Electric Company Method and apparatus for 3D reconstruction of images
WO2006067663A1 (en) * 2004-12-22 2006-06-29 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Real-time list mode reconstruction
US7381960B1 (en) * 2006-11-11 2008-06-03 National Tsing Hua University Imaging system and method for the non-pure positron emission tomography
CN106526651B (en) * 2015-09-14 2019-08-23 上海联影医疗科技有限公司 The method for building up and system of a kind of detector crystal position table

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6490476B1 (en) * 1999-10-14 2002-12-03 Cti Pet Systems, Inc. Combined PET and X-ray CT tomograph and method for using same

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6490476B1 (en) * 1999-10-14 2002-12-03 Cti Pet Systems, Inc. Combined PET and X-ray CT tomograph and method for using same

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
S.J. Glick, et al., "the Effect of Photon Incident Angle on Spatial Resolution with Thick Crystal Hybrid PET," The Journal of Nuclear Medicine-Proceedings of the 47th Annual Meeting, Jun. 5, 2000.

Cited By (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20040026620A1 (en) * 2002-08-12 2004-02-12 William Peter Mission-specific positron emission tomography
US7115874B2 (en) * 2002-08-12 2006-10-03 Naviscan Pet Systems, Inc. Mission-specific positron emission tomography
US20050068570A1 (en) * 2003-09-25 2005-03-31 Hart Peter E. Printer user interface
WO2007084771A3 (en) * 2006-01-20 2008-07-10 Seno Medical Instr Inc Quantitative optoacoustic tomography with enhanced contrast
US20110072967A1 (en) * 2009-09-30 2011-03-31 Wood Willard E Packaging Material Such as Film, Fiber, Woven and Nonwoven Fabric with Adsorbancy
CN104217447B (en) * 2013-06-04 2018-08-03 上海联影医疗科技有限公司 A kind of method and medical imaging system for PET image reconstruction
CN104217447A (en) * 2013-06-04 2014-12-17 上海联影医疗科技有限公司 Method for reconstructing PET (Positron Emission Tomography) image and medical imaging system
US10975300B2 (en) 2019-08-21 2021-04-13 Meishan Boya Advanced Materials Co., Ltd. Methods and devices for growing scintillation crystals with short decay time
US11242485B2 (en) 2019-08-21 2022-02-08 Meishan Boya Advanced Materials Co., Ltd. Methods and devices for growing scintillation crystals with short decay time
US11254868B2 (en) 2019-08-21 2022-02-22 Meishan Boya Advanced Materials Co., Ltd. Methods and devices for growing scintillation crystals with short decay time
US11827826B2 (en) 2019-08-21 2023-11-28 Meishan Boya Advanced Materials Co., Ltd. Methods and devices for growing scintillation crystals
US12116517B2 (en) 2019-08-21 2024-10-15 Meishan Boya Advanced Materials Co., Ltd. Methods and devices for growing scintillation crystals
US11054534B1 (en) 2020-04-24 2021-07-06 Ronald Nutt Time-resolved positron emission tomography encoder system for producing real-time, high resolution, three dimensional positron emission tomographic image without the necessity of performing image reconstruction
US11300695B2 (en) 2020-04-24 2022-04-12 Ronald Nutt Time-resolved positron emission tomography encoder system for producing event-by-event, real-time, high resolution, three-dimensional positron emission tomographic image without the necessity of performing image reconstruction

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20040069951A1 (en) 2004-04-15

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6852980B2 (en) On-line DOI rebinning for LSO PET/SPECT spatial resolution
Lewellen et al. Investigation of the performance of the General Electric ADVANCE positron emission tomograph in 3D mode
Watanabe et al. A high resolution PET for animal studies
US6762413B2 (en) Correction for depth-dependent sensitivity in rotating slat-collimated gamma camera
Brix et al. Performance evaluation of a whole-body PET scanner using the NEMA protocol
US6674083B2 (en) Positron emission tomography apparatus
US5818050A (en) Collimator-free photon tomography
US4095107A (en) Transaxial radionuclide emission camera apparatus and method
US7105824B2 (en) High resolution photon emission computed tomographic imaging tool
US7817827B2 (en) Enhanced planar single photon emission imaging
US20030001098A1 (en) High resolution photon emission computed tomographic imaging tool
MacDonald et al. Parallax correction in PET using depth of interaction information
Weber et al. Evaluation of the TierPET system
US6429434B1 (en) Transmission attenuation correction method for PET and SPECT
DeVito et al. Energy-weighted acquisition of scintigraphic images using finite spatial filters
Schmand et al. Performance evaluation of a new LSO high resolution research tomograph-HRRT
US7560699B2 (en) Small field-of-view detector head (“SPECT”) attenuation correction system
Badawi et al. Self-normalization of emission data in 3D PET
US7304307B2 (en) PMT signal correlation filter
Chang et al. New methods of examining gamma camera collimators
JPH09281243A (en) Nuclear medical diagnostic device
JP4344038B2 (en) PET equipment
Rouze et al. IndyPET-a high resolution, high sensitivity dedicated research scanner
US6718006B2 (en) Fiber-optic encoding for dual transmission measurements in positron emission tomography
Bartzakos et al. A PET detector with depth-of-interaction determination

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: CTI PET SYSTEMS, INC., TENNESSEE

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:JONES, WILLIAM F.;BENDRIEM, BERNARD;REEL/FRAME:012281/0632

Effective date: 20011017

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

AS Assignment

Owner name: SIEMENS MEDICAL SOLUTIONS USA, INC.,PENNSYLVANIA

Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:CTI PET SYSTEMS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:018535/0183

Effective date: 20060930

Owner name: SIEMENS MEDICAL SOLUTIONS USA, INC., PENNSYLVANIA

Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:CTI PET SYSTEMS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:018535/0183

Effective date: 20060930

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 8

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 12

点击 这是indexloc提供的php浏览器服务,不要输入任何密码和下载