Godsoe et al., 2017 - Google Patents
Effects of biotic interactions on modeled species' distribution can be masked by environmental gradientsGodsoe et al., 2017
View PDF- Document ID
- 1438473283859918681
- Author
- Godsoe W
- Franklin J
- Blanchet F
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Ecology and evolution
External Links
Snippet
A fundamental goal of ecology is to understand the determinants of species' distributions (ie, the set of locations where a species is present). Competition among species (ie, interactions among species that harms each of the species involved) is common in nature and it would …
- 241000894007 species 0 title abstract description 206
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
- G06F17/10—Complex mathematical operations
- G06F17/18—Complex mathematical operations for evaluating statistical data, e.g. average values, frequency distributions, probability functions, regression analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
- G06F17/50—Computer-aided design
- G06F17/5009—Computer-aided design using simulation
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
- G06F17/30—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F17/30861—Retrieval from the Internet, e.g. browsers
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
- G06F17/30—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F17/30286—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor in structured data stores
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management, e.g. organising, planning, scheduling or allocating time, human or machine resources; Enterprise planning; Organisational models
- G06Q10/063—Operations research or analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06N—COMPUTER SYSTEMS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
- G06N99/00—Subject matter not provided for in other groups of this subclass
- G06N99/005—Learning machines, i.e. computer in which a programme is changed according to experience gained by the machine itself during a complete run
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F21/00—Security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
- G06F21/50—Monitoring users, programs or devices to maintain the integrity of platforms, e.g. of processors, firmware or operating systems
- G06F21/57—Certifying or maintaining trusted computer platforms, e.g. secure boots or power-downs, version controls, system software checks, secure updates or assessing vulnerabilities
- G06F21/577—Assessing vulnerabilities and evaluating computer system security
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06N—COMPUTER SYSTEMS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
- G06N3/00—Computer systems based on biological models
- G06N3/02—Computer systems based on biological models using neural network models
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F21/00—Security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
- G06F21/60—Protecting data
- G06F21/62—Protecting access to data via a platform, e.g. using keys or access control rules
- G06F21/6218—Protecting access to data via a platform, e.g. using keys or access control rules to a system of files or objects, e.g. local or distributed file system or database
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/10—Office automation, e.g. computer aided management of electronic mail or groupware; Time management, e.g. calendars, reminders, meetings or time accounting
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06N—COMPUTER SYSTEMS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
- G06N5/00—Computer systems utilising knowledge based models
- G06N5/04—Inference methods or devices
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Systems or methods specially adapted for a specific business sector, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/01—Social networking
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q40/00—Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Systems or methods specially adapted for a specific business sector, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/10—Services
- G06Q50/20—Education
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Godsoe et al. | Effects of biotic interactions on modeled species' distribution can be masked by environmental gradients | |
| Howard et al. | A global assessment of the drivers of threatened terrestrial species richness | |
| Liu et al. | The effect of sample size on the accuracy of species distribution models: considering both presences and pseudo‐absences or background sites | |
| Thorson et al. | Joint dynamic species distribution models: a tool for community ordination and spatio‐temporal monitoring | |
| Guerra et al. | Global projections of the soil microbiome in the Anthropocene | |
| van Proosdij et al. | Minimum required number of specimen records to develop accurate species distribution models | |
| Nelson et al. | An error budget for different sources of error in digital soil mapping | |
| Ghafory‐Ashtiany et al. | Strong ground motion record selection for the reliable prediction of the mean seismic collapse capacity of a structure group | |
| Stewart-Oaten et al. | Temporal and spatial variation in environmental impact assessment | |
| Albert et al. | Sampling in ecology and evolution–bridging the gap between theory and practice | |
| Ghosh et al. | A hierarchical Bayesian spatio‐temporal model for extreme precipitation events | |
| Johnson | Extension of Nakagawa & Schielzeth's R2GLMM to random slopes models | |
| Gilbert et al. | Partitioning variation in ecological communities: do the numbers add up? | |
| Barve et al. | The crucial role of the accessible area in ecological niche modeling and species distribution modeling | |
| Liu et al. | Selecting thresholds of occurrence in the prediction of species distributions | |
| Thuiller et al. | BIOMOD–a platform for ensemble forecasting of species distributions | |
| Kissling et al. | Spatial autocorrelation and the selection of simultaneous autoregressive models | |
| Araújo et al. | Five (or so) challenges for species distribution modelling | |
| Mateo et al. | Profile or group discriminative techniques? Generating reliable species distribution models using pseudo‐absences and target‐group absences from natural history collections | |
| Littell et al. | Managing uncertainty in climate‐driven ecological models to inform adaptation to climate change | |
| Aldwaik et al. | Map errors that could account for deviations from a uniform intensity of land change | |
| Record et al. | Should species distribution models account for spatial autocorrelation? A test of model projections across eight millennia of climate change | |
| Liu et al. | Comparing the random forest with the generalized additive model to evaluate the impacts of outdoor ambient environmental factors on scaffolding construction productivity | |
| Harisena et al. | When is variable importance estimation in species distribution modelling affected by spatial correlation? | |
| Betts et al. | Comment on “Methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distributional data: a review” |