-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
experiment with removing uv #16
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Signed-off-by: William Woodruff <william@yossarian.net>
Signed-off-by: William Woodruff <william@yossarian.net>
Signed-off-by: William Woodruff <william@yossarian.net>
Signed-off-by: William Woodruff <william@yossarian.net>
Signed-off-by: William Woodruff <william@yossarian.net>
Signed-off-by: William Woodruff <william@yossarian.net>
Signed-off-by: William Woodruff <william@yossarian.net>
Signed-off-by: William Woodruff <william@yossarian.net>
Signed-off-by: William Woodruff <william@yossarian.net>
This "works," but at no small cost:
(1) and (3) are annoying but not deal breakers, since this action will definitely have a "happy path" for newer runners and doesn't really need to support Windows runners (since they're significantly slower anyways). But (2) might be a deal breaker if I can't bring the performance up. |
This was a good experiment, but the lack of an immediate perf boost + additional maintenance overhead makes it not super appealing in the short term. I'm going to experiment with #19 as another alternative approach here. |
No description provided.