+
Skip to content

Conversation

KJhellico
Copy link
Collaborator

Proposed change

Fix TestAllInSameYear methods.

Type of change

  • New country/market holidays support (thank you!)
  • Supported country/market holidays update (calendar discrepancy fix, localization)
  • Existing code/documentation/test/process quality improvement (best practice, cleanup, refactoring, optimization)
  • Dependency update (version deprecation/pin/upgrade)
  • Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Breaking change (a code change causing existing functionality to break)
  • New feature (new holidays functionality in general)

Checklist

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 30, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Refined assertion placement within iteration loops to validate holiday parser results per year/market iteration rather than aggregating checks at a broader scope. This improves test precision and failure localization without altering any runtime behavior.
  • Chores
    • No changes to user-facing functionality; this update strictly enhances test reliability and maintenance.

Walkthrough

Asserts validating the .years attribute in tests/test_utils.py were moved into the outer per-year/per-market loop. The same checks now execute once per iteration of that loop, instead of once per country/market block. No function calls or expected values changed; only assertion placement/indentation shifted.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Test assertion placement adjustment
tests/test_utils.py
Moved two .years assertions inside the outer per-year/per-market loop; indentation-only relocation so assertions run per iteration. No changes to called functions, expected values, or public interfaces.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Suggested labels

test

Suggested reviewers

  • arkid15r
  • PPsyrius
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR/Issue comments)

Type @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore or @coderabbit ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Status, Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Status Page to check the current availability of CodeRabbit.
  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the test label Aug 30, 2025
Copy link

Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 30, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (53770ab) to head (aa32b23).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on dev.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               dev     #2877   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files          294       294           
  Lines        17445     17445           
  Branches      2262      2262           
=========================================
  Hits         17445     17445           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

📜 Review details

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

💡 Knowledge Base configuration:

  • MCP integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories

You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 53770ab and aa32b23.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/test_utils.py (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (13)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: PPsyrius
PR: vacanza/holidays#2386
File: tests/countries/test_nepal.py:499-536
Timestamp: 2025-04-05T06:49:06.217Z
Learning: In the holidays project, test files follow a dual testing approach: individual methods test specific holidays across multiple years, while comprehensive year-specific tests (e.g., `test_2025`) verify all holidays for a specific year in a single assertion. Both approaches serve different testing purposes and complement each other.
Learnt from: KJhellico
PR: vacanza/holidays#2631
File: tests/countries/test_sint_maarten.py:62-0
Timestamp: 2025-06-14T21:12:07.224Z
Learning: KJhellico prefers to focus on completing and reviewing the main holiday implementation code before doing detailed reviews of the corresponding test files.
Learnt from: PPsyrius
PR: vacanza/holidays#2416
File: tests/countries/test_turkmenistan.py:52-64
Timestamp: 2025-04-05T04:47:27.213Z
Learning: For holiday tests in the vacanza/holidays project, structure tests by individual holidays rather than by years. Each test method should focus on a specific holiday and test it across multiple years (from start_year through 2050) using helper methods like `assertHolidayName`. For fixed holidays, use generators like `(f"{year}-01-01" for year in range(1991, 2051))`. For movable holidays, specify individual dates for specific years followed by a range check.
Learnt from: KJhellico
PR: vacanza/holidays#2530
File: tests/countries/test_andorra.py:23-28
Timestamp: 2025-05-06T21:07:11.577Z
Learning: In the holidays project, test methods for country holidays follow a standard form where year ranges are explicitly recreated in each test method rather than being stored as class variables, to maintain consistency across all country tests.
Learnt from: PPsyrius
PR: vacanza/holidays#2794
File: tests/calendars/test_julian.py:35-36
Timestamp: 2025-08-12T17:16:54.497Z
Learning: In the vacanza/holidays project calendar tests (Thai, Ethiopian, Julian, etc.), the established testing pattern for validation methods is to use simple for loops like `for year in known_data_dict:` followed by `self.assertEqual(expected, actual)` without using unittest's subTest feature. This pattern is consistently maintained across all calendar test files.
📚 Learning: 2025-04-05T04:47:27.213Z
Learnt from: PPsyrius
PR: vacanza/holidays#2416
File: tests/countries/test_turkmenistan.py:52-64
Timestamp: 2025-04-05T04:47:27.213Z
Learning: For holiday tests in the vacanza/holidays project, structure tests by individual holidays rather than by years. Each test method should focus on a specific holiday and test it across multiple years (from start_year through 2050) using helper methods like `assertHolidayName`. For fixed holidays, use generators like `(f"{year}-01-01" for year in range(1991, 2051))`. For movable holidays, specify individual dates for specific years followed by a range check.

Applied to files:

  • tests/test_utils.py
📚 Learning: 2025-04-05T06:49:06.217Z
Learnt from: PPsyrius
PR: vacanza/holidays#2386
File: tests/countries/test_nepal.py:499-536
Timestamp: 2025-04-05T06:49:06.217Z
Learning: In the holidays project, test files follow a dual testing approach: individual methods test specific holidays across multiple years, while comprehensive year-specific tests (e.g., `test_2025`) verify all holidays for a specific year in a single assertion. Both approaches serve different testing purposes and complement each other.

Applied to files:

  • tests/test_utils.py
📚 Learning: 2025-05-06T21:07:11.577Z
Learnt from: KJhellico
PR: vacanza/holidays#2530
File: tests/countries/test_andorra.py:23-28
Timestamp: 2025-05-06T21:07:11.577Z
Learning: In the holidays project, test methods for country holidays follow a standard form where year ranges are explicitly recreated in each test method rather than being stored as class variables, to maintain consistency across all country tests.

Applied to files:

  • tests/test_utils.py
📚 Learning: 2025-04-02T18:38:35.164Z
Learnt from: KJhellico
PR: vacanza/holidays#2398
File: tests/countries/test_guinea.py:237-239
Timestamp: 2025-04-02T18:38:35.164Z
Learning: In the vacanza/holidays project, the method assertLocalizedHolidays in country test files should be called with positional parameters rather than named parameters to maintain consistency with the rest of the codebase.

Applied to files:

  • tests/test_utils.py
📚 Learning: 2025-06-15T11:52:39.572Z
Learnt from: PPsyrius
PR: vacanza/holidays#2601
File: tests/countries/test_mongolia.py:128-156
Timestamp: 2025-06-15T11:52:39.572Z
Learning: In the vacanza/holidays project tests, when testing holidays that span multiple consecutive days across many years (like Mongolia's National Festival spanning July 11-13), prefer explicit for loops over complex nested generator expressions with unpacking. The explicit loops are more readable, easier to maintain, and better communicate the testing intent even though the Big O complexity is equivalent.

Applied to files:

  • tests/test_utils.py
📚 Learning: 2025-08-12T17:16:54.497Z
Learnt from: PPsyrius
PR: vacanza/holidays#2794
File: tests/calendars/test_julian.py:35-36
Timestamp: 2025-08-12T17:16:54.497Z
Learning: In the vacanza/holidays project calendar tests (Thai, Ethiopian, Julian, etc.), the established testing pattern for validation methods is to use simple for loops like `for year in known_data_dict:` followed by `self.assertEqual(expected, actual)` without using unittest's subTest feature. This pattern is consistently maintained across all calendar test files.

Applied to files:

  • tests/test_utils.py
📚 Learning: 2025-04-03T16:58:27.175Z
Learnt from: Wasif-Shahzad
PR: vacanza/holidays#2409
File: holidays/countries/qatar.py:27-46
Timestamp: 2025-04-03T16:58:27.175Z
Learning: In the holidays library, method names like `_add_holiday_2nd_tue_of_feb()` and `_add_holiday_1st_sun_of_mar()` use calendar constants internally through parent class implementations even when these constants don't appear directly in the file. Removing imports that seem unused based on a simple text search could break functionality.

Applied to files:

  • tests/test_utils.py
📚 Learning: 2025-06-18T10:10:46.158Z
Learnt from: PPsyrius
PR: vacanza/holidays#2642
File: tests/countries/test_france.py:24-27
Timestamp: 2025-06-18T10:10:46.158Z
Learning: The holidays library prioritizes full test coverage over performance in test suites. Modern library-wide standards favor comprehensive testing across all subdivisions and wide year ranges (e.g., 1803-2050 for France) to ensure thorough validation, even if it creates many test objects.

Applied to files:

  • tests/test_utils.py
📚 Learning: 2025-07-24T15:21:31.632Z
Learnt from: PPsyrius
PR: vacanza/holidays#2750
File: tests/countries/test_germany.py:46-46
Timestamp: 2025-07-24T15:21:31.632Z
Learning: In the holidays project test files, the standard method name for testing the absence of holidays is `test_no_holidays`, not more descriptive names like `test_no_holidays_before_1990`. This is a consistent naming convention across country test files like France and Germany.

Applied to files:

  • tests/test_utils.py
📚 Learning: 2025-08-19T19:47:21.735Z
Learnt from: KJhellico
PR: vacanza/holidays#2829
File: tests/countries/test_canada.py:291-296
Timestamp: 2025-08-19T19:47:21.735Z
Learning: In the holidays library, HolidayBase objects automatically populate years on-demand when expand=True (the default). When checking dates from years not initially in the years range, those years are automatically populated via the logic at line 646 in holiday_base.py: "if self.expand and dt.year not in self.years:". This means tests can check dates outside the initial year range without needing separate holiday instances.

Applied to files:

  • tests/test_utils.py
📚 Learning: 2025-08-25T04:28:02.061Z
Learnt from: PPsyrius
PR: vacanza/holidays#2848
File: tests/countries/test_somalia.py:44-127
Timestamp: 2025-08-25T04:28:02.061Z
Learning: In the holidays library, Islamic holiday tests use `self.no_estimated_holidays = Country(years=years, islamic_show_estimated=False)` as the library-wide standard approach to simplify test cases. This pattern is intentional and preferred over testing estimated labels.

Applied to files:

  • tests/test_utils.py
📚 Learning: 2025-08-30T12:49:19.654Z
Learnt from: KJhellico
PR: vacanza/holidays#2834
File: tests/financial/test_national_stock_exchange_of_india.py:342-360
Timestamp: 2025-08-30T12:49:19.654Z
Learning: The assertLocalizedHolidays method in the vacanza/holidays project requires a complete list of all holidays for the specific year being tested, not just a subset. When testing localization, all holidays from that year must be included in the assertion.

Applied to files:

  • tests/test_utils.py
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
tests/test_utils.py (1)
holidays/utils.py (2)
  • country_holidays (32-228)
  • financial_holidays (231-313)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 300000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)
  • GitHub Check: Test build on windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: Test build on ubuntu-latest
  • GitHub Check: Test build on macos-latest
🔇 Additional comments (2)
tests/test_utils.py (2)

112-117: Correctly scoped .years assertion per-country.

Moving the years-equality check inside the country loop ensures we validate each country instead of only the last iterated one. This directly fixes the original test bug.


135-140: Correctly scoped .years assertion per-market.

Same fix applied to financial markets—now validated per market rather than just the last one.

Copy link
Collaborator

@arkid15r arkid15r left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This fill slow down our relatively fast tests 😆

Well spotted!

@arkid15r arkid15r enabled auto-merge August 30, 2025 22:28
@arkid15r arkid15r added this pull request to the merge queue Aug 30, 2025
Merged via the queue into vacanza:dev with commit a459edc Aug 30, 2025
36 checks passed
@KJhellico KJhellico deleted the fix-test-all-same-year branch August 31, 2025 09:08
@arkid15r arkid15r mentioned this pull request Sep 1, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

点击 这是indexloc提供的php浏览器服务,不要输入任何密码和下载