+
Skip to content

Conversation

KJhellico
Copy link
Collaborator

@KJhellico KJhellico commented Aug 13, 2025

Proposed change

Update Canada holidays: adjust introduction year of National Aboriginal Day in NT (2001).

Type of change

  • New country/market holidays support (thank you!)
  • Supported country/market holidays update (calendar discrepancy fix, localization)
  • Existing code/documentation/test/process quality improvement (best practice, cleanup, refactoring, optimization)
  • Dependency update (version deprecation/pin/upgrade)
  • Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Breaking change (a code change causing existing functionality to break)
  • New feature (new holidays functionality in general)

Checklist

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 13, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • None
  • Bug Fixes
    • Corrected Canada (Northwest Territories) holiday data: National Aboriginal Day now applies from 2001 onward (removed listings for 1996–2000). Yukon remains unchanged (starts 2017).
  • Tests
    • Updated test coverage to reflect the revised NT start year and align with helper signature changes.

Walkthrough

Adjusted Canada holiday logic to require year >= 2001 for Northwest Territories National Aboriginal Day, removed NT snapshot entries for 1996–2000, and updated tests to reflect the new 2001 start year.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary of changes
Holiday logic (Canada)
holidays/countries/canada.py
Changed NT National Aboriginal Day threshold from self._year >= 1996 to self._year >= 2001; added docstring bullet noting NT start year.
Snapshots (NT)
snapshots/countries/CA_NT.json
Removed five National Aboriginal Day entries for 1996-06-21 through 2000-06-21.
Tests (Canada/NT)
tests/countries/test_canada.py
Updated tests to assert NT holiday presence from range(2001, 2050) and absence for range(1867, 2001); adjusted test helper call signatures for NT/YT checks.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes

Suggested reviewers

  • PPsyrius
  • arkid15r

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3798822 and b07e8df.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/countries/test_canada.py (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (12)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: KJhellico
PR: vacanza/holidays#2530
File: tests/countries/test_andorra.py:23-28
Timestamp: 2025-05-06T21:07:11.577Z
Learning: In the holidays project, test methods for country holidays follow a standard form where year ranges are explicitly recreated in each test method rather than being stored as class variables, to maintain consistency across all country tests.
Learnt from: PPsyrius
PR: vacanza/holidays#2537
File: tests/countries/test_finland.py:23-26
Timestamp: 2025-05-09T18:36:09.607Z
Learning: The holidays project prioritizes complete historical coverage in tests, verifying holidays from their first year of observance (e.g., 1853 for Finland) through future projections, rather than using shorter sliding windows.
Learnt from: PPsyrius
PR: vacanza/holidays#2609
File: holidays/countries/nauru.py:48-50
Timestamp: 2025-06-14T11:05:21.250Z
Learning: In the holidays library, newer implementations use `start_year` to indicate the earliest year with complete holiday data coverage, not necessarily the first year a holiday existed. If a holiday system starts partway through a year (like Nauru's Public Holidays Act starting Jan 31, 1968), the start_year should be set to the following year (1969) to ensure users get full annual holiday coverage.
Learnt from: KJhellico
PR: vacanza/holidays#2608
File: tests/countries/test_saint_vincent_and_the_grenadines.py:162-178
Timestamp: 2025-07-02T18:17:53.342Z
Learning: In the Saint Vincent and the Grenadines holidays implementation, New Year's Day is added without observed rules using `_add_new_years_day()` and should not include observed rule testing in its test method. Only holidays explicitly wrapped with `_add_observed()` have observed behavior.
Learnt from: PPsyrius
PR: vacanza/holidays#2489
File: holidays/countries/sao_tome_and_principe.py:22-26
Timestamp: 2025-04-23T14:55:35.504Z
Learning: References in holidays classes should only be included if they're used for test case cross-checks or provide historical context about when holidays were added/removed, not just for the sake of having more references.
Learnt from: PPsyrius
PR: vacanza/holidays#2489
File: holidays/countries/sao_tome_and_principe.py:22-26
Timestamp: 2025-04-23T14:55:35.504Z
Learning: References in holidays classes should only be included if they're used for test case cross-checks or provide historical context about when holidays were added/removed, not just for the sake of having more references.
Learnt from: PPsyrius
PR: vacanza/holidays#2416
File: tests/countries/test_turkmenistan.py:52-64
Timestamp: 2025-04-05T04:47:27.213Z
Learning: For holiday tests in the vacanza/holidays project, structure tests by individual holidays rather than by years. Each test method should focus on a specific holiday and test it across multiple years (from start_year through 2050) using helper methods like `assertHolidayName`. For fixed holidays, use generators like `(f"{year}-01-01" for year in range(1991, 2051))`. For movable holidays, specify individual dates for specific years followed by a range check.
📚 Learning: 2025-05-06T21:07:11.577Z
Learnt from: KJhellico
PR: vacanza/holidays#2530
File: tests/countries/test_andorra.py:23-28
Timestamp: 2025-05-06T21:07:11.577Z
Learning: In the holidays project, test methods for country holidays follow a standard form where year ranges are explicitly recreated in each test method rather than being stored as class variables, to maintain consistency across all country tests.

Applied to files:

  • tests/countries/test_canada.py
📚 Learning: 2025-04-05T04:47:27.213Z
Learnt from: PPsyrius
PR: vacanza/holidays#2416
File: tests/countries/test_turkmenistan.py:52-64
Timestamp: 2025-04-05T04:47:27.213Z
Learning: For holiday tests in the vacanza/holidays project, structure tests by individual holidays rather than by years. Each test method should focus on a specific holiday and test it across multiple years (from start_year through 2050) using helper methods like `assertHolidayName`. For fixed holidays, use generators like `(f"{year}-01-01" for year in range(1991, 2051))`. For movable holidays, specify individual dates for specific years followed by a range check.

Applied to files:

  • tests/countries/test_canada.py
📚 Learning: 2025-07-24T15:21:31.632Z
Learnt from: PPsyrius
PR: vacanza/holidays#2750
File: tests/countries/test_germany.py:46-46
Timestamp: 2025-07-24T15:21:31.632Z
Learning: In the holidays project test files, the standard method name for testing the absence of holidays is `test_no_holidays`, not more descriptive names like `test_no_holidays_before_1990`. This is a consistent naming convention across country test files like France and Germany.

Applied to files:

  • tests/countries/test_canada.py
📚 Learning: 2025-04-05T06:49:06.217Z
Learnt from: PPsyrius
PR: vacanza/holidays#2386
File: tests/countries/test_nepal.py:499-536
Timestamp: 2025-04-05T06:49:06.217Z
Learning: In the holidays project, test files follow a dual testing approach: individual methods test specific holidays across multiple years, while comprehensive year-specific tests (e.g., `test_2025`) verify all holidays for a specific year in a single assertion. Both approaches serve different testing purposes and complement each other.

Applied to files:

  • tests/countries/test_canada.py
📚 Learning: 2025-07-09T21:16:35.145Z
Learnt from: KJhellico
PR: vacanza/holidays#2623
File: tests/countries/test_christmas_island.py:136-146
Timestamp: 2025-07-09T21:16:35.145Z
Learning: In Christmas Island's holiday implementation, the test_christmas_day method cannot use assertNoNonObservedHoliday because in some years observed Christmas Day overlaps with Boxing Day when both holidays are moved due to weekend conflicts, causing the standard non-observed holiday check to fail inappropriately.

Applied to files:

  • tests/countries/test_canada.py
📚 Learning: 2025-05-09T18:36:09.607Z
Learnt from: PPsyrius
PR: vacanza/holidays#2537
File: tests/countries/test_finland.py:23-26
Timestamp: 2025-05-09T18:36:09.607Z
Learning: The holidays project prioritizes complete historical coverage in tests, verifying holidays from their first year of observance (e.g., 1853 for Finland) through future projections, rather than using shorter sliding windows.

Applied to files:

  • tests/countries/test_canada.py
📚 Learning: 2025-07-02T18:17:53.342Z
Learnt from: KJhellico
PR: vacanza/holidays#2608
File: tests/countries/test_saint_vincent_and_the_grenadines.py:162-178
Timestamp: 2025-07-02T18:17:53.342Z
Learning: In the Saint Vincent and the Grenadines holidays implementation, New Year's Day is added without observed rules using `_add_new_years_day()` and should not include observed rule testing in its test method. Only holidays explicitly wrapped with `_add_observed()` have observed behavior.

Applied to files:

  • tests/countries/test_canada.py
📚 Learning: 2025-06-15T11:52:39.572Z
Learnt from: PPsyrius
PR: vacanza/holidays#2601
File: tests/countries/test_mongolia.py:128-156
Timestamp: 2025-06-15T11:52:39.572Z
Learning: In the vacanza/holidays project tests, when testing holidays that span multiple consecutive days across many years (like Mongolia's National Festival spanning July 11-13), prefer explicit for loops over complex nested generator expressions with unpacking. The explicit loops are more readable, easier to maintain, and better communicate the testing intent even though the Big O complexity is equivalent.

Applied to files:

  • tests/countries/test_canada.py
📚 Learning: 2025-07-02T18:21:59.302Z
Learnt from: KJhellico
PR: vacanza/holidays#2608
File: tests/countries/test_saint_vincent_and_the_grenadines.py:162-178
Timestamp: 2025-07-02T18:21:59.302Z
Learning: In the Saint Vincent and the Grenadines holiday tests, for holidays without observed rules that only require a single assertHolidayName call, pass the holiday name directly as a string literal rather than storing it in a variable first for cleaner, more concise code.

Applied to files:

  • tests/countries/test_canada.py
📚 Learning: 2025-04-02T18:38:35.164Z
Learnt from: KJhellico
PR: vacanza/holidays#2398
File: tests/countries/test_guinea.py:237-239
Timestamp: 2025-04-02T18:38:35.164Z
Learning: In the vacanza/holidays project, the method assertLocalizedHolidays in country test files should be called with positional parameters rather than named parameters to maintain consistency with the rest of the codebase.

Applied to files:

  • tests/countries/test_canada.py
📚 Learning: 2025-06-14T20:43:15.370Z
Learnt from: KJhellico
PR: vacanza/holidays#2631
File: holidays/countries/sint_maarten.py:94-95
Timestamp: 2025-06-14T20:43:15.370Z
Learning: The `_add_*` helper methods in the holidays library (such as `_add_christmas_day_two()`, `_add_labor_day()`, etc.) don't have default holiday names, so the name parameter should always be explicitly specified when calling these methods.

Applied to files:

  • tests/countries/test_canada.py
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
tests/countries/test_canada.py (1)
tests/common.py (2)
  • assertHolidayName (195-199)
  • assertNoHolidayName (273-275)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 300000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: Test docs build
🔇 Additional comments (1)
tests/countries/test_canada.py (1)

777-778: NT start year updated to 2001 and param order fixed — LGTM

  • NT: range updated to 2001–2049 with the corresponding pre-2001 negative check. Correct and matches the PR intent.
  • YT: the assertNoHolidayName call now correctly passes the name as the first argument. Good catch and fix.

Also applies to: 780-780

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR/Issue comments)

Type @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Status, Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Status Page to check the current availability of CodeRabbit.
  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 13, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (890f889) to head (b07e8df).
⚠️ Report is 10 commits behind head on dev.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               dev     #2804   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files          284       284           
  Lines        17049     17049           
  Branches      2253      2253           
=========================================
  Hits         17049     17049           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 890f889 and 3798822.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • holidays/countries/canada.py (2 hunks)
  • snapshots/countries/CA_NT.json (0 hunks)
  • tests/countries/test_canada.py (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • snapshots/countries/CA_NT.json
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (16)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: PPsyrius
PR: vacanza/holidays#2537
File: tests/countries/test_finland.py:23-26
Timestamp: 2025-05-09T18:36:09.607Z
Learning: The holidays project prioritizes complete historical coverage in tests, verifying holidays from their first year of observance (e.g., 1853 for Finland) through future projections, rather than using shorter sliding windows.
Learnt from: KJhellico
PR: vacanza/holidays#2530
File: tests/countries/test_andorra.py:23-28
Timestamp: 2025-05-06T21:07:11.577Z
Learning: In the holidays project, test methods for country holidays follow a standard form where year ranges are explicitly recreated in each test method rather than being stored as class variables, to maintain consistency across all country tests.
Learnt from: PPsyrius
PR: vacanza/holidays#2609
File: holidays/countries/nauru.py:48-50
Timestamp: 2025-06-14T11:05:21.250Z
Learning: In the holidays library, newer implementations use `start_year` to indicate the earliest year with complete holiday data coverage, not necessarily the first year a holiday existed. If a holiday system starts partway through a year (like Nauru's Public Holidays Act starting Jan 31, 1968), the start_year should be set to the following year (1969) to ensure users get full annual holiday coverage.
Learnt from: PPsyrius
PR: vacanza/holidays#2489
File: holidays/countries/sao_tome_and_principe.py:22-26
Timestamp: 2025-04-23T14:55:35.504Z
Learning: References in holidays classes should only be included if they're used for test case cross-checks or provide historical context about when holidays were added/removed, not just for the sake of having more references.
Learnt from: PPsyrius
PR: vacanza/holidays#2489
File: holidays/countries/sao_tome_and_principe.py:22-26
Timestamp: 2025-04-23T14:55:35.504Z
Learning: References in holidays classes should only be included if they're used for test case cross-checks or provide historical context about when holidays were added/removed, not just for the sake of having more references.
📚 Learning: 2025-05-06T21:07:11.577Z
Learnt from: KJhellico
PR: vacanza/holidays#2530
File: tests/countries/test_andorra.py:23-28
Timestamp: 2025-05-06T21:07:11.577Z
Learning: In the holidays project, test methods for country holidays follow a standard form where year ranges are explicitly recreated in each test method rather than being stored as class variables, to maintain consistency across all country tests.

Applied to files:

  • tests/countries/test_canada.py
📚 Learning: 2025-04-05T04:47:27.213Z
Learnt from: PPsyrius
PR: vacanza/holidays#2416
File: tests/countries/test_turkmenistan.py:52-64
Timestamp: 2025-04-05T04:47:27.213Z
Learning: For holiday tests in the vacanza/holidays project, structure tests by individual holidays rather than by years. Each test method should focus on a specific holiday and test it across multiple years (from start_year through 2050) using helper methods like `assertHolidayName`. For fixed holidays, use generators like `(f"{year}-01-01" for year in range(1991, 2051))`. For movable holidays, specify individual dates for specific years followed by a range check.

Applied to files:

  • tests/countries/test_canada.py
📚 Learning: 2025-06-14T10:58:43.636Z
Learnt from: PPsyrius
PR: vacanza/holidays#2629
File: tests/countries/test_namibia.py:22-23
Timestamp: 2025-06-14T10:58:43.636Z
Learning: In the vacanza/holidays project, country test files consistently use range(start_year, 2050) which intentionally excludes 2050 and stops at 2049. This is a library-wide implementation pattern, not an off-by-one error.

Applied to files:

  • tests/countries/test_canada.py
📚 Learning: 2025-07-24T15:21:31.632Z
Learnt from: PPsyrius
PR: vacanza/holidays#2750
File: tests/countries/test_germany.py:46-46
Timestamp: 2025-07-24T15:21:31.632Z
Learning: In the holidays project test files, the standard method name for testing the absence of holidays is `test_no_holidays`, not more descriptive names like `test_no_holidays_before_1990`. This is a consistent naming convention across country test files like France and Germany.

Applied to files:

  • tests/countries/test_canada.py
📚 Learning: 2025-07-02T18:17:53.342Z
Learnt from: KJhellico
PR: vacanza/holidays#2608
File: tests/countries/test_saint_vincent_and_the_grenadines.py:162-178
Timestamp: 2025-07-02T18:17:53.342Z
Learning: In the Saint Vincent and the Grenadines holidays implementation, New Year's Day is added without observed rules using `_add_new_years_day()` and should not include observed rule testing in its test method. Only holidays explicitly wrapped with `_add_observed()` have observed behavior.

Applied to files:

  • tests/countries/test_canada.py
📚 Learning: 2025-05-09T18:36:09.607Z
Learnt from: PPsyrius
PR: vacanza/holidays#2537
File: tests/countries/test_finland.py:23-26
Timestamp: 2025-05-09T18:36:09.607Z
Learning: The holidays project prioritizes complete historical coverage in tests, verifying holidays from their first year of observance (e.g., 1853 for Finland) through future projections, rather than using shorter sliding windows.

Applied to files:

  • tests/countries/test_canada.py
📚 Learning: 2025-04-05T06:49:06.217Z
Learnt from: PPsyrius
PR: vacanza/holidays#2386
File: tests/countries/test_nepal.py:499-536
Timestamp: 2025-04-05T06:49:06.217Z
Learning: In the holidays project, test files follow a dual testing approach: individual methods test specific holidays across multiple years, while comprehensive year-specific tests (e.g., `test_2025`) verify all holidays for a specific year in a single assertion. Both approaches serve different testing purposes and complement each other.

Applied to files:

  • tests/countries/test_canada.py
📚 Learning: 2025-07-09T21:16:35.145Z
Learnt from: KJhellico
PR: vacanza/holidays#2623
File: tests/countries/test_christmas_island.py:136-146
Timestamp: 2025-07-09T21:16:35.145Z
Learning: In Christmas Island's holiday implementation, the test_christmas_day method cannot use assertNoNonObservedHoliday because in some years observed Christmas Day overlaps with Boxing Day when both holidays are moved due to weekend conflicts, causing the standard non-observed holiday check to fail inappropriately.

Applied to files:

  • tests/countries/test_canada.py
📚 Learning: 2025-06-16T11:42:28.293Z
Learnt from: PPsyrius
PR: vacanza/holidays#2638
File: holidays/countries/svalbard_and_jan_mayen.py:1-12
Timestamp: 2025-06-16T11:42:28.293Z
Learning: In the holidays library codebase, country implementation files in holidays/countries/ follow a standard convention of NOT having module-level docstrings. They start with the license header comment block, followed by imports, then class definitions. This is consistent across all country implementations like austria.py, belgium.py, canada.py, etc.

Applied to files:

  • holidays/countries/canada.py
📚 Learning: 2025-06-18T10:07:58.780Z
Learnt from: PPsyrius
PR: vacanza/holidays#2642
File: holidays/countries/french_southern_territories.py:41-44
Timestamp: 2025-06-18T10:07:58.780Z
Learning: Territorial holiday classes that inherit from parent countries (like HolidaysAX from Finland, HolidaysSJ from Norway, HolidaysTF from France) follow a standard pattern of silently overriding self.subdiv in their _populate_public_holidays() method without validation, as this ensures they always use the correct subdivision code for their territory regardless of user input.

Applied to files:

  • holidays/countries/canada.py
📚 Learning: 2025-03-30T20:18:46.006Z
Learnt from: KJhellico
PR: vacanza/holidays#2386
File: holidays/countries/nepal.py:24-26
Timestamp: 2025-03-30T20:18:46.006Z
Learning: In the holidays library, country classes do not directly implement `_populate()`. Instead, they implement specialized methods like `_populate_public_holidays()`, and the base class `HolidayBase` handles the orchestration by calling these specialized methods.

Applied to files:

  • holidays/countries/canada.py
📚 Learning: 2025-06-14T11:04:31.180Z
Learnt from: PPsyrius
PR: vacanza/holidays#2609
File: holidays/countries/nauru.py:57-60
Timestamp: 2025-06-14T11:04:31.180Z
Learning: In the holidays library, the base `HolidayBase._populate()` method already includes a guard clause that prevents holiday population methods like `_populate_public_holidays()` from being called when the year is before `start_year` or after `end_year`. Therefore, individual country implementations do not need to add their own guard clauses for years before independence or other start dates.

Applied to files:

  • holidays/countries/canada.py
📚 Learning: 2025-06-18T10:58:28.058Z
Learnt from: PPsyrius
PR: vacanza/holidays#2642
File: holidays/countries/france.py:184-206
Timestamp: 2025-06-18T10:58:28.058Z
Learning: In the holidays library France implementation, creating shared private methods between subdivision-specific holiday population methods (like _populate_subdiv_57_public_holidays and _populate_subdiv_6ae_public_holidays) is not supported by the current framework architecture, so duplicate code between functionally identical subdivision methods should be left as-is.

Applied to files:

  • holidays/countries/canada.py
📚 Learning: 2025-06-18T10:26:50.180Z
Learnt from: PPsyrius
PR: vacanza/holidays#2642
File: holidays/countries/france.py:178-180
Timestamp: 2025-06-18T10:26:50.180Z
Learning: In the France holidays implementation, the _populate_subdiv_57_public_holidays() (Moselle) and _populate_subdiv_6ae_public_holidays() (Alsace) methods are functionally identical, both adding Good Friday (≥1893) and Saint Stephen's Day (≥1892) with the same legal references from August 16th, 1892. Therefore, for the deprecated "Alsace-Moselle" subdivision, calling either method produces the same result.

Applied to files:

  • holidays/countries/canada.py
📚 Learning: 2025-07-10T03:36:16.461Z
Learnt from: PPsyrius
PR: vacanza/holidays#2706
File: holidays/countries/cayman_islands.py:80-97
Timestamp: 2025-07-10T03:36:16.461Z
Learning: In the holidays library, date dictionaries that map years to specific dates (like queens_birthday_dates, special holiday dates, etc.) are typically defined within the _populate_public_holidays method rather than as module-level constants. This is the established library-wide pattern and should be maintained for consistency.

Applied to files:

  • holidays/countries/canada.py
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
tests/countries/test_canada.py (1)
tests/common.py (2)
  • assertHolidayName (195-199)
  • assertNoHolidayName (273-275)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 300000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: Test Python 3.13 on windows-latest
🔇 Additional comments (1)
holidays/countries/canada.py (1)

374-377: NT National Aboriginal Day correctly gated from 2001
Code in _populate_subdiv_nt_public_holidays uses if self._year >= 2001 and test_canada.py asserts NT holidays only from 2001 onward. The lone >= 1996 check is for Nova Scotia’s Natal Day, not Aboriginal Day. All tests and snapshots align—no further changes needed.

Copy link

Copy link
Collaborator

@PPsyrius PPsyrius left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 🇨🇦

@arkid15r arkid15r added this pull request to the merge queue Aug 14, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

@arkid15r arkid15r left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

Merged via the queue into vacanza:dev with commit 6f8049e Aug 14, 2025
36 checks passed
@KJhellico KJhellico deleted the upd-canada branch August 14, 2025 10:53
@arkid15r arkid15r mentioned this pull request Aug 18, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

点击 这是indexloc提供的php浏览器服务,不要输入任何密码和下载