[ONNX] Add bloom ops #94878
Closed
[ONNX] Add bloom ops #94878
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
[ghstack-poisoned]
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/94878
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ⏳ No Failures, 6 PendingAs of commit 2e57c52: This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
justinchuby
approved these changes
Feb 15, 2023
|
@pytorchbot merge |
|
@pytorchbot merge -f "just some entries in a dictionary" |
Merge startedYour change will be merged immediately since you used the force (-f) flag, bypassing any CI checks (ETA: 1-5 minutes). Learn more about merging in the wiki. Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team |
pytorchmergebot
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 15, 2023
This reverts commit ea65772. Reverted #94763 on behalf of https://github.com/wschin due to One line conflict with #94878
pytorchmergebot
referenced
this pull request
Feb 15, 2023
As title. The re-factorization of ONNX test framework disabled one exporter. This PR just brings that test back. Pull Request resolved: #94763 Approved by: https://github.com/justinchuby, https://github.com/abock
This was referenced Feb 15, 2023
drisspg
pushed a commit
to drisspg/pytorch
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 16, 2023
pytorch@449a85b should be included Pull Request resolved: pytorch#94878 Approved by: https://github.com/justinchuby
drisspg
pushed a commit
to drisspg/pytorch
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 16, 2023
This reverts commit ea65772. Reverted pytorch#94763 on behalf of https://github.com/wschin due to One line conflict with pytorch#94878
pruthvistony
added a commit
to ROCm/pytorch
that referenced
this pull request
May 2, 2023
This reverts commit 799df90.
jhavukainen
pushed a commit
to kulinseth/pytorch
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 15, 2024
pytorch@449a85b should be included Pull Request resolved: pytorch#94878 Approved by: https://github.com/justinchuby
jhavukainen
pushed a commit
to kulinseth/pytorch
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 15, 2024
This reverts commit ea65772. Reverted pytorch#94763 on behalf of https://github.com/wschin due to One line conflict with pytorch#94878
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):
449a85b should be included