+
Skip to content

Conversation

randName
Copy link
Contributor

resolves #1170

I chose to explicitly pass in the event rather than do it implicitly like this

app.get("/", noContent);

in case there are future signature changes

@randName randName requested a review from pi0 as a code owner July 24, 2025 00:23
@randName randName changed the title fix example for noContent util fix(docs): example for noContent util Jul 24, 2025
@randName randName changed the title fix(docs): example for noContent util docs: fix example for noContent util Jul 24, 2025
Copy link
Member

@pi0 pi0 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@pi0 pi0 merged commit ab774c6 into h3js:main Jul 24, 2025
3 checks passed
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 24, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

@randName randName deleted the docs/nocontent-example branch July 31, 2025 13:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

wrong example for noContent utility

2 participants

点击 这是indexloc提供的php浏览器服务,不要输入任何密码和下载