+
Skip to content

Conversation

marcmo
Copy link
Contributor

@marcmo marcmo commented Sep 8, 2025

originates from CR #135090

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 8, 2025

The created documentation from the pull request is available at: docu-html

@FScholPer
Copy link
Contributor

For me this is step 2. As long as there is no branch protection in the modules.

@masc2023
Copy link
Contributor

masc2023 commented Sep 8, 2025

For me this is step 2. As long as there is no branch protection in the modules.

Unclear, what do you mean?

@FScholPer
Copy link
Contributor

For me this is step 2. As long as there is no branch protection in the modules.

Unclear, what do you mean?

I mean as long as there are pushes to master allowed in some repositories without any issue it makes no sense to activate this part of the process

@masc2023
Copy link
Contributor

masc2023 commented Sep 8, 2025

For me this is step 2. As long as there is no branch protection in the modules.

Unclear, what do you mean?

I mean as long as there are pushes to master allowed in some repositories without any issue it makes no sense to activate this part of the process

Then I set it back to draft, please consider, what we want then show at the next audit as real working example

@FScholPer
Copy link
Contributor

@antonkri we need the process fullfiled until next audit( I know you are working on that)


name: "Change Request"
description: Issue to track a change
title: "Change: Your Change Request title"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How about title: "Change Request: Your Change Request title"

options:
- label: Feature Request/Modification
- label: Component Request/Modification
required: true
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Any reason why "component modification" is required?

update to reflect changes in process description
eclipse-score/process_description#167 and
eclipse-score/process_description#148

Resolves: eclipse-score#1310
Change-Id: I6a58c1f0c457c654230e01ffb30a179b1729bcf4
Copy link
Contributor

@aschemmel-tech aschemmel-tech left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Template takeover and docu changes ok

Copy link
Member

@AlexanderLanin AlexanderLanin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

change of template seems fine from an infrasturcture point of view

@masc2023 masc2023 merged commit 4861cf1 into eclipse-score:main Sep 23, 2025
6 checks passed
@marcmo marcmo deleted the cr-135090 branch September 23, 2025 13:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

EPIC: PMP - Change Management Plan, ML2

7 participants

点击 这是indexloc提供的php浏览器服务,不要输入任何密码和下载