-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 60
update change management plan #1706
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
The created documentation from the pull request is available at: docu-html |
For me this is step 2. As long as there is no branch protection in the modules. |
Unclear, what do you mean? |
I mean as long as there are pushes to master allowed in some repositories without any issue it makes no sense to activate this part of the process |
Then I set it back to draft, please consider, what we want then show at the next audit as real working example |
@antonkri we need the process fullfiled until next audit( I know you are working on that) |
|
||
name: "Change Request" | ||
description: Issue to track a change | ||
title: "Change: Your Change Request title" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How about title: "Change Request: Your Change Request title"
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/3-change.yml
Outdated
options: | ||
- label: Feature Request/Modification | ||
- label: Component Request/Modification | ||
required: true |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Any reason why "component modification" is required?
update to reflect changes in process description eclipse-score/process_description#167 and eclipse-score/process_description#148 Resolves: eclipse-score#1310 Change-Id: I6a58c1f0c457c654230e01ffb30a179b1729bcf4
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Template takeover and docu changes ok
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
change of template seems fine from an infrasturcture point of view
originates from CR #135090