Natoma #26
-
Hey, my team is evaluating Natoma and how it compares to MCPJungle. I would love to hear your thoughts! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tMQy68n7EsU&ab_channel=MCPDevelopersSummit |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 2 comments 2 replies
-
@ericdallo welcome! Few things I'd like to share about MCPJungle:
If you can tell me your use case, I can help provide even more clarity and even prioritise some features. As for Natoma, although I'm not an authority on it, here's my take:
If you have a lot of enterprise needs like identity, security & audit, compliance, infra-as-code, etc today, perhaps Natoma works for you at the expense of being a lot more complex as a product. Mcpjungle aims to be super simple & lightweight, but as of today it is not suitable for large enterprise deployments that have a lot of strict requirements. Happy to hear your thoughts! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Version |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
@ericdallo welcome!
Few things I'd like to share about MCPJungle:
It's a Registry + Gateway Proxy
You can register and track all your MCP servers in mcpjungle.
All your MCP clients (claude, cursor, your ai agents) just need to connect to a single URL - the mcpjungle gateway - to access all the MCP tools.
It allows you to control which clients can access which mcp servers using ACLs
It is currently self-hosted
You run mcpjungle on your local or your own server. Either directly or inside Docker.
We're evaluating providing a SaaS offering but don't have any definite plans right now.
Things that we'll release in the next 1 month