+
Avatar

The Vampire Armand’s PR Manager

@professional-rat-eater

Kili | 25 | she/her

I do think that Daniel acted differently interviewing the vampires than he might with humans. Not that he's not fundamentally the same person no matter what, but rather that some of his abrasiveness and douchebag behavior isn't just because he's an old insensitive jerk, which he is, but because he is functionally being held captive by supernatural creatures who eat people and who have tried to kill him before.

"Save it for the rent boy." Daniel is not specifically trying to insult fake Rashid here. I mean he obviously does not care about hurting his feelings, but that's not the point of the line. He's telling Louis that he's not the stupid kid he used to be. He's saying look, I have immediately clocked that you're screwing the butler. Don't think you can trick me. I know what kind of rich person you are.

That line also hits worse because we know what Armand has been through but Daniel at that point does not. Daniel is also implied to have engaged in sex work as a young man so he's talking as someone who isn't there anymore, not someone who has never been there and never would be.

I know Daniel's a jerk and a hypocrite and that's what makes him fun but he's also the same guy who used to find people who fell through the cracks, who used to interview Kevin the disabled Vietnam vet who lives with his Vietnamese refugee boyfriend because those stories matter too.

say what you want about Armand de Problematic, but if the crush who rejected you after you humiliated yourself begging for his attention suddenly came crawling back years later asking for help, you’d throw his bitch ass off a tower too

I had someone tell me I didn’t understand the show for suggesting that Louis’s decision to leave Daniel alone with Armand was impulsive. It quite literally was.

That’s literally Louis’s entire thing. He wants so badly to be in control of his life that he holds everything back until he explodes and does something impulsive. He’s the king of never asking questions and not thinking things through.

He says verbatim: “I shouldn’t have left you alone with him.” That’s clear regret. Louis didn’t think it through at all. It wouldn’t shock me at all if he never actually made transportation arrangements for Daniel to leave Dubai, that’s how little thought he appeared to put into it.

And I get it. He had a lot of other stuff to think about at that time. Totally understandable. When you find out your life is a lie and you’ve wasted eighty years with someone, the human reporter who helped implode your relationship who you leave with your murderous ex might slip your mind. I’d probably do the same.

Let’s not pretend Louis had any kind of solid plan there. He couldn’t actually do anything to stop Armand if he wanted to. He threatened to kill him if he harmed Daniel, and guess what? Daniel was harmed and Armand doesn’t look very dead.

Louis’s messiness is half the beauty of the character. Why pretend he’s someone he’s not?

Thinking about Assad using the word hunger to describe Armand’s arc and how that one word literally summarises his entire character.

Armand isn’t just hungry. He’s completely starved. For his entire existence, everyone he has come into contact with has starved him of absolutely everything. Not one moment of his life has been normal for even an instant. He’s just been wandering the earth for 500 years with no idea what he’s searching for, just that he’s searching.

He’s never really been a person before. No one has ever afforded him the luxury. All love had been transactional, withholding, abusive and/or ended in tragedy. He doesn’t get to have anything permanent or sincere. That isn’t how it has ever worked in his experience.

Until Daniel. The only one that comes close to making him feel fulfilled. With Daniel, he gets to explore. He gets to experiment. With Daniel, we get to see Armand daring to touch the fragments of all the people he’s been forced to become and attempt to build them up into something whole. His habits and interests seem strange to us and to Daniel but he’s behaving exactly like a child would.

But Daniel scares him, and rightfully so. You wouldn’t believe the love you’d been aching for for five centuries was real either. Not when you’d spent so long starving.

"I hate when the skeletons on decorations aren't anatomically accurate." A Halloween skeleton isn't the same as what's inside you, idiot. It's different. A Halloween skeleton is, like. A guy or something. It's an animal.

If Halloween skeletons had bones like ours instead of hollow bones like that of a bird, they wouldn't be able to play their ribcages like xylophones. You sound so fucking uneducated right now.

My detailed plan for a Dracula adaptation that doesn’t inevitably disappoint people:

I get the movie greenlit. The budget is a billion dollars. Everyone wants to know why. That feels excessive.

The trailer comes out. It’s obscene. Explosions. Out of place sex scenes. Someone’s hanging off the side of a train at one point. Also the train is on fire. Quincey lassos Dracula at one point. Wait, there’s a cowboy in Dracula? Gun fights. Dracula with a glock. Those didn’t exist back then. Blood everywhere. Whatever other shit needs to be there to bait people into seeing the movie.

People see the movie out of morbid curiosity. This is the theatre exclusive run. They come in and sit down. The lights dim.

Then they brighten again. The doors lock. It was a trap. There was glue on all of the seats. Now they’re all trapped. The trailer was all that was filmed and the entire budget was used.

I come out with a copy of Dracula. No one is allowed to leave until they listen to me read the entire thing. I do this in every cinema in the world. When I’m done, they can leave. No one will believe them.

Bonus when it comes out on streaming: the victims of the cinema run start posting online. Everyone thinks it’s fake but they watch the movie anyway. They can’t help themselves. They press play. I emerge from the floorboards. They’re glued to the nearest surface. I hold them hostage in their own home and they listen to the entire novel. Then I release them.

Over eight billion people on earth. When I’m done, there will be no one left to claim Dracula is romantically involved with Mina. It’s foolproof.

I try to stay away from saying “[insert actor name] is just playing themselves” regarding actors I like because that sort of comment is usually reserved for actors who can’t really act.

But god damn Eric Bogosian is perfectly cast. He does come off as a better person than Daniel (who by this point in the timeline is almost certainly a serial killer) but in terms of attitude, they’re almost identical. Eric is a talented, versatile actor on top of that, but this is just an instance where an actor is born to play a character. The promotional material for Talamasca has been so much fun and Eric has been killing it.

A fictional character getting cancelled in real life and the people who make the show he’s on forcing him to issue an (incredibly disingenuous) apology might go down as one of the funniest things to happen in fandom history.

Twitter got mad at him. They made him say sorry. He was a dick about it the entire time. Daniel Molloy, the icon you are.

Anonymous asked:

I don't know if this is relevant, But I think alot of the discourse comes from Louis stans not being accepting of the fact that he can be a flawed character. So they absolve him of all his flaws and blame other characters for all his issues namely Lestat, Armand and sometimes Daniel.

They only use Claudia as a tool to say that he was a 'good father/brother' to her even though he wasn't all of the time, which is partially why I think he redacted some of the diary entries (speculation). I think Louis was in the right for not wanting that particular Claudia story to be out there fully, but I also think Daniel was telling the truth about what would happen with or without the full story.

(Also didn't Daniel sign a contract in season 1 for the book (or was this another type of contract), so he would have to deliver something to the publisher)

(I also think Daniel is the least problematic out of the vampires so far. They are all at least mass murders (Daniel might need a few centuries to catch up))

Oh absolutely. I’ve just had one in the comments of my own post being super weird for absolutely no reason. So condescending and yet so wrong.

The way they characterise Louis is so boring. I love how messy he is. I love how impulsive he is. They truly can’t handle him being complex, which is literally what makes him interesting in the first place.

Imagine nothing being his fault in the show all about perspective. What a bland protagonist he would be. What terrible writing.

It’s kind of fitting that they’d use Claudia like that though. Louis did it in the interview. It adds up that some of his diehard fans would do the same.

I personally think Louis failed Claudia more than anyone else but mostly because he was meant to be the most invested in her. He was closest with her, so his failure stings the most. Even he knows he failed her. He admits it so many times. He was a terrible father/brother. That’s why he carries so much guilt. We’re still able to like him despite this because that’s the sort of show this is.

It makes sense that Louis would want to redact that part of Claudia’s diaries but Daniel wasn’t wrong with anything he said. If he doesn’t know the content of the pages, it calls the validity of the entire interview into question. He could’ve asked Daniel not to put it in but preemptively censoring Claudia is 1. still exploiting her and 2. speaking for her. She’s dead. Her diaries are all that is left of what she believed. Daniel is a journalist with integrity, hence why he didn’t go for that.

And he knew how Claudia would be received. He was correct. He did the job he was asked to do and he was honest with Louis about what would happen. Louis should’ve been clear that he had no intention of allowing the book to ever be published but being honest is something we’ve learned he struggles with.

Being in the IWTV fandom and opening tumblr in public is riskier than Russian roulette.

You might get some tragic character analysis or some gifsets. You might also get straight up porn.

Either way, it’ll be undoubtedly beautiful (the artists in this fandom are insanely talented) but the people around you will probably be more thankful for accidentally glancing at one over the other.

Not suggesting anyone should stop posting what they’re posting btw. The fandom is a wonderful, eclectic mess, and it’s a great way to test your reflexes.

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.
点击 这是indexloc提供的php浏览器服务,不要输入任何密码和下载