10/10 points: Provide a valid pubspec.yaml

5/5 points: Provide a valid README.md

5/5 points: Provide a valid CHANGELOG.md

10/10 points: Use an OSI-approved license

Detected license: MIT.

10/10 points: 20% or more of the public API has dartdoc comments

50 out of 50 API elements (100.0 %) have documentation comments.

10/10 points: Package has an example

20/20 points: Supports 6 of 6 possible platforms (iOS, Android, Web, Windows, macOS, Linux)

• ✓ Android

• ✓ iOS

• ✓ Windows

• ✓ Linux

• ✓ macOS

• ✓ Web

0/0 points: WASM compatibility

This package is compatible with runtime wasm, and will be rewarded additional points in a future version of the scoring model.

See https://dart.dev/web/wasm for details.

40/50 points: code has no errors, warnings, lints, or formatting issues

Found 6 issues. Showing the first 2:

  ╷
4 │ /// Values returned are defined by the Generic <T> parameter of the [DoWhat] object.
  │                                                ^^^
  ╵

  ╷
7 │ /// [Null] objects will return an [What] result while valid objects will return a [DoWhat] containing the valid [Object] of <T> value.
  │                                                                                                                             ^^^
  ╵

10/10 points: All of the package dependencies are supported in the latest version

No dependencies.

To reproduce run dart pub outdated --no-dev-dependencies --up-to-date --no-dependency-overrides.

10/10 points: Package supports latest stable Dart and Flutter SDKs

20/20 points: Compatible with dependency constraint lower bounds

pub downgrade does not expose any static analysis error.