refactor: adding random seed in one test #156
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
|
I've checked similar PRs files to other repositories. To me it looks like an AI generated description. The patch doesn't make a ton of sense. Contributions are always welcome, but please do not send random AI stuff in... |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
While reviewing the code, I noticed that the
test_exceptions.pyfile uses random operations and does not have seed. This pull request updates thetest_exceptions.pyfile to include theseedfunction from the random module and sets a fixed seed valueseed(42). This ensures reproducible random operations in the test, improving consistency and helping to prevent potential flakiness in test results in the ci.