-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
Improve buffer.prev() & buffer.next() #294
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## dev #294 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 94.51% 93.90% -0.61%
==========================================
Files 45 45
Lines 3152 3185 +33
==========================================
+ Hits 2979 2991 +12
- Misses 173 194 +21
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
I prefer unfinished index over last_index. |
Typically in atari training pipeline, buf.prev takes over 30% time. This pr aims to optimize buffer.prev/next: use njit to make it faster.