这是indexloc提供的服务,不要输入任何密码
Skip to content

Add validation for label probability distribution in softmax_cross_entropy_with_logits #96387

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

IamParvSinghal
Copy link

Problem

The softmax_cross_entropy_with_logits_v2 function was silently accepting invalid label inputs where the probability vectors did not sum to 1. This is a common ML bug that can lead to incorrect loss calculations and poor model training results without any clear error indication.

Thought Process

  1. Identified the issue: Found a TODO comment in the code indicating this exact problem needed to be addressed
  2. Analyzed impact: Invalid probability distributions in labels can cause:
    • Incorrect gradient calculations
    • Misleading loss values
    • Silent failures that are hard to debug
  3. Considered implementation approach: Needed to handle both eager and graph execution modes appropriately
  4. Balanced validation vs. performance: Added tolerance for floating-point precision while maintaining strict validation

Solution

Added validation logic that:

  • Checks label sums: Verifies each label vector sums to 1.0 (within 1e-5 tolerance)
  • Handles execution modes:
    • Graph mode: Uses TensorFlow assertions with control dependencies
    • Eager mode: Direct numpy validation with immediate error raising
  • Provides clear error messages: Explains the requirement for valid probability distributions
  • Maintains performance: Minimal overhead with early validation

Long Term Effect

  • Improved debugging: Developers will immediately catch invalid label inputs
  • Better model reliability: Prevents silent failures that could lead to incorrect model behavior
  • Educational value: Clear error messages help users understand proper label formatting
  • Consistency: Aligns with TensorFlow's philosophy of catching errors early
  • Future-proofing: Sets precedent for similar validation in other loss functions

Tech Stack/Resources Used

  • TensorFlow Core: Used math_ops.reduce_sum, check_ops.assert_near, array_ops.ones_like
  • Python: Standard library imports (numpy for eager mode validation)
  • TensorFlow Execution Context: Leveraged context.executing_eagerly() for mode-specific handling
  • Error Handling: Implemented both assertion ops (graph mode) and ValueError (eager mode)
  • Code Analysis Tools: Used semantic search and grep to identify the TODO and understand the codebase structure

@google-ml-butler google-ml-butler bot added the size:S CL Change Size: Small label Jul 3, 2025
@google-ml-butler google-ml-butler bot requested a review from cantonios July 3, 2025 23:35
@google-ml-butler google-ml-butler bot added the awaiting review Pull request awaiting review label Jul 3, 2025
@keerthanakadiri keerthanakadiri added the comp:ops OPs related issues label Jul 4, 2025
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to Assigned Reviewer in PR Queue Jul 4, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
awaiting review Pull request awaiting review comp:ops OPs related issues size:S CL Change Size: Small
Projects
Status: Assigned Reviewer
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants