Codicons: Preserve smaller icons #1216
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
738034c to
3445d2d
Compare
3 tasks
Collaborator
Author
|
Why is this closed without commits? |
[why] The codicons have 3 obvious (from the name) pairs of regular and small icons. The size difference is slight but visible. When we maximize all individual icons the differences are mostly lost. [how] Put each pair into one ScaleGroup to keep their individual scaling. Fixes: #1214 Signed-off-by: Fini Jastrow <ulf.fini.jastrow@desy.de>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
[why]
The codicons have 3 obvious (from the name) pairs of regular and small icons. The size difference is slight but visible.
When we maximize all individual icons the differences are mostly lost.
[how]
Put each pair into one ScaleGroup to keep their individual scaling.
Fixes: #1214
Requirements / Checklist
What does this Pull Request (PR) do?
How should this be manually tested?
Any background context you can provide?
What are the relevant tickets (if any)?
Screenshots (if appropriate or helpful)