Improve formatting of Agave Readme #379
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Owner
|
Thanks, good improvement! There is a potential issue in that these changes will be eventually be overwritten due to how the patched fonts readmes are generated. See my comment here for more details: #381 (comment) |
LNKLEO
pushed a commit
to LNKLEO/Nerd
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 24, 2023
Improve formatting of Agave Readme (intermediate fix)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Update the formatting to use Markdown format to display correctly on GitHub
Requirements / Checklist
./font-patcher Inconsolata.otf --fontawesome --octicons --pomicons./gotta-patch-em-all-font-patcher\!.sh HermitI figured this step wasn't necessary for this change
What does this Pull Request (PR) do?
Improves the formatting of documentation with appropriate format
How should this be manually tested?
Check the Readme file on GitHub