adds some minor changes to the vig #659
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Hi everyone. I will add two comments here instead of creating a new PR
I will try to play with tmap4 for the upcoming projects. Thanks, @mtennekes. |
|
Hi @agila5 -- I am also getting a map, but only with borders (and I assume that there should be a base map image underneath the borders, but it is missing) |
|
Ops, sorry you are right. I completely missed the "basemap" step... |
mtennekes
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 8, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Additional two comments:
tm_shape()specifies the spatial data object, which can be any spatial data object from the packagessf,stars,terra,sp, andraster." - this is not true for SpatVector (from terra)