这是indexloc提供的服务，不要输入任何密码
Skip to content

chore(deps): bump deps #812

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 5, 2025
Merged

chore(deps): bump deps #812

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 5, 2025

Conversation

@Boshen
Copy link
Member

@Boshen Boshen commented Nov 5, 2025

No description provided.

@Boshen Graphite App
Copy link
Member Author

Boshen commented Nov 5, 2025

How to use the Graphite Merge Queue

Add the label merge to this PR to add it to the merge queue.

You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link.

An organization admin has enabled the Graphite Merge Queue in this repository.

Please do not merge from GitHub as this will restart CI on PRs being processed by the merge queue.

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

@graphite-app
Copy link

graphite-app bot commented Nov 5, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Merge activity

@Boshen Boshen force-pushed the 11-05-chore_deps_bump_deps branch from 2de408b to 5ce20d3 Compare November 5, 2025 09:49
@graphite-app graphite-app bot force-pushed the 11-05-chore_deps_bump_deps branch from 5ce20d3 to 1dfdc55 Compare November 5, 2025 09:50
@graphite-app graphite-app bot merged commit 1dfdc55 into main Nov 5, 2025
12 checks passed
@graphite-app graphite-app bot deleted the 11-05-chore_deps_bump_deps branch November 5, 2025 09:53
@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Nov 5, 2025

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #812 will not alter performance

Comparing 11-05-chore_deps_bump_deps (1dfdc55) with main (0455854)1

Summary

✅ 10 untouched
⏩ 5 skipped2

Footnotes

  1. No successful run was found on main (1dfdc55) during the generation of this report, so 0455854 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩

  2. 5 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@Boshen