Seeing now that the file changes on Jupyter Notebooks are hard to preview, I can imagine it might be difficult to approve this one. The changes I made were small and only to the naming of the key fields in the meta_data dictionary. If you have an alternative way to make contributions or suggestions for PR's, let me know, i'd love to help make this more accessible.

Hi @mathyouf ,

I really thank you for your tips! I downloaded the files and looked at them. Looks good overall 😊
A few comments:

1. I'm not sure I understood what is supposed to be the difference between mapper_playground.ipynb and mapper_playground-checkpoint.ipynb.
2. About adding Beyonce's last name - I must admit I didn't know that this is her last name 😂 I didn't use it in the driving text so I think it is better to keep the option in the dropdown as 'Beyonce' only. What do you think?

Thanks,
Or

Hi @orpatashnik,

Thanks for the appreciation! I hope I can keep contributing to improved visualization tools for this project, since i'm a GAN researcher myself and want to make it easier to navigate and visualize what's going on.

1. I'm not sure I understood what is supposed to be the difference between mapper_playground.ipynb and mapper_playground-checkpoint.ipynb.

That was checked-in on accident. I've deleted it now in the latest commit.

2. About adding Beyonce's last name - I must admit I didn't know that this is her last name 😂 I didn't use it in the driving text so I think it is better to keep the option in the dropdown as 'Beyonce' only. What do you think?

I was on the fence about this, because some of the category id's imply that they were trained on truncations of the celebrities name. Examples: Jhonny Depp->depp, Mark Zuckerberg -> zuckerberg, Taylor Swift -> taylor_swift. From a researcher's perspective, the exact string would be the most clear for exact interpretation. From a layperson's perspective, it would be more confusing. What were your thoughts on that, are the id's matches for what it was trained on?

Thanks for taking the time to review this PR. 🙂