这是indexloc提供的服务,不要输入任何密码
Skip to content

Do not treat extra as an error. #2

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

nowells
Copy link
Collaborator

@nowells nowells commented Feb 6, 2015

I might be missing something in the spec, but I don't think extra maps to an error state? tap-spec only treats it as additional output: https://github.com/scottcorgan/tap-spec/blob/master/index.js#L92

@namuol what do you think? Was there a reason behind extra -> error. If you agree with this I will add tests and defer to you for review.

I might be missing something in the spec, but I don't think `extra` maps to an error state? `tap-spec` only treats it as additional output: https://github.com/scottcorgan/tap-spec/blob/master/index.js#L92
@namuol
Copy link
Owner

namuol commented Feb 7, 2015

I think extra blocks were treated as errors in the original version of tap-min that I forked. I can see how this might cause false errors when all tests actually succeed, though. If you're using this on your end, merge away. :)

@namuol
Copy link
Owner

namuol commented Sep 10, 2015

Duplicate of #3 -- fixed now.

@namuol namuol closed this Sep 10, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants