Is it possible to start with the tree view closed? #328
-
|
I often need to quickly view a single text file, not a project, and for that I find the the tree view distracting. I tried adding the following to my User module, but it has no effect on start-up: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 2 comments 6 replies
-
|
yes, you just need to put it in a separate thread (idk why) core.add_thread(function ()
command.perform("treeview:toggle")
end) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
The reason is that the user module is loaded before all plugins, so |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Perfect! Thank you! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Why it doesn't work for me? I have a clean install of Lite XL 2.1.7 and my init.lua is: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Does the Log tab open at startup by itself? If it does, is there any error? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I added logs in the core.log("Hi from init.lua before adding thread where treeview is toggled")
core.add_thread(function ()
core.log("hi from thread before toggling treeview")
command.perform("treeview:toggle")
core.log("hi from thread after toggling treeview")
end)and looking into logs it seems that |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Maybe it's ok that Here is my workaround for it: core.log("Hi from init.lua before adding thread where treeview is toggled")
if core.ADDED_CLOSING_TREEVIEW_THREAD == nil then
core.add_thread(function ()
core.log("hi from thread before toggling treeview")
command.perform("treeview:toggle")
core.log("hi from thread after toggling treeview")
end)
end
core.ADDED_CLOSING_TREEVIEW_THREAD = true |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Oh yeah, totally forgot about this. It's a consequence of how the Settings GUI plugin works. Try with this: local TreeView = require "plugins.treeview"
TreeView.visible = false |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
yes, you just need to put it in a separate thread (idk why)