这是indexloc提供的服务,不要输入任何密码
Skip to content

Document remote only caching #967

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Apr 7, 2022
Merged

Document remote only caching #967

merged 6 commits into from
Apr 7, 2022

Conversation

gaspar09
Copy link
Contributor

@gaspar09 gaspar09 commented Mar 29, 2022

  • Add docs for remote-only

impl: #969

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Mar 29, 2022

This pull request is being automatically deployed with Vercel (learn more).
To see the status of your deployment, click below or on the icon next to each commit.

🔍 Inspect: https://vercel.com/vercel/turbo-site/5N29VG2SzDPCzYp7gVfzjGGMavHj
✅ Preview: https://turbo-site-git-gaspar-remote-only.vercel.sh

@gaspar09 gaspar09 changed the title Implement remote only Implement remote only caching Mar 29, 2022
@jaredpalmer
Copy link
Contributor

Let’s move docs to another PR

This reverts commit 66aff6a.
@gaspar09 gaspar09 changed the title Implement remote only caching Docs remote only caching Mar 29, 2022
@gaspar09 gaspar09 mentioned this pull request Mar 29, 2022
@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Apr 7, 2022

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Updated Deployment Preview
turbo-site ✅ Deployed Apr 7, 2022 at 8:51PM (UTC) View on Vercel View Preview

@jaredpalmer jaredpalmer changed the title Docs remote only caching Document remote only caching Apr 7, 2022
@jaredpalmer jaredpalmer merged commit 3d613a0 into main Apr 7, 2022
@jaredpalmer jaredpalmer deleted the gaspar/remote-only branch April 7, 2022 20:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants