Added dockerfile and Makefile for easy building #32
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
For those struggling to replicate usage of the dockerfile, change the first line to pull from debian:bookworm as the version stated is very old as of writing, and as such fetches packages in a way that no longer works. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
If accepted this will add a Dockerfile for reference.
I ran into the same problems found in:
#26
#29
gcc-multilibpackage will provide the 32bit libraries needed in cases where the host building the application are all 64bit.Let me know if there is anything I can improve/add/document to make this Merge ready.