feat: upgrade esbuild to 0.21.4, opts-in for decorators #1116
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Review or Edit in CodeSandboxOpen the branch in Web Editor • VS Code • Insiders |
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
|
New and removed dependencies detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎
🚮 Removed packages: npm/esbuild@0.19.2 |
sxzz
approved these changes
Jun 3, 2024
Contributor
|
🎉 This PR is included in version 8.1.0 🎉 The release is available on: Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
|
welcome back :) |
This was referenced Aug 7, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This uprades the esbuild requirements to ^0.21.3, closes #1115
Motivations
Tests done:
I didn't notice regressions so far. I've forced latest esbuild in few projects by using resolutions (ie: https://github.com/belgattitude/httpx/blob/16e7dcebf8a2c2f90e53f0beb7d87eeaf8698fc6/package.json#L80)
Haven't had the chance to test it with projects bundling css, so I hope there wasn't breaking changes.