Omit DWARF symbol table and debug information from go binaries #3793
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This will reduce the size of binaries in exchange for worse debugging output. This is acceptable for our users and worth it to save money on packagecloud package hosting - which is currently free under a given repository size.
josegonzalez
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 28, 2019
# History ## 0.19.10 Install/update via the bootstrap script: ```shell wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dokku/dokku/v0.19.10/bootstrap.sh sudo DOKKU_TAG=v0.19.10 bash bootstrap.sh ``` ### Bug Fixes - #3784: @josegonzalez Ensure checks attempts are tracked per-check instead of globally ### New Features - #3793: @josegonzalez Omit DWARF symbol table and debug information from go binaries - #3792: @josegonzalez Unify property function implementations ### Documentation - #3712: @fruitl00p Added new plugin ### Other - #3790: @dependabot-preview[bot] chore(deps): bump gunicorn from 20.0.3 to 20.0.4 in /tests/apps/python-flask - #3791: @dependabot-preview[bot] chore(deps): bump gunicorn from 20.0.3 to 20.0.4 in /tests/apps/multi - #3787: @dependabot-preview[bot] chore(deps): bump gunicorn from 20.0.2 to 20.0.3 in /tests/apps/multi - #3788: @dependabot-preview[bot] chore(deps): bump gunicorn from 20.0.2 to 20.0.3 in /tests/apps/python-flask - #3785: @dependabot-preview[bot] chore(deps): bump gunicorn from 20.0.0 to 20.0.2 in /tests/apps/python-flask - #3786: @dependabot-preview[bot] chore(deps): bump gunicorn from 20.0.0 to 20.0.2 in /tests/apps/multi - #3748: @dependabot-preview[bot] chore(deps): [security] bump express from 2.5.11 to 4.17.1 in /tests/apps/dockerfile-dokku-scale - #3749: @dependabot-preview[bot] chore(deps): [security] bump express from 2.5.11 to 4.17.1 in /tests/apps/nodejs-express-noappjson - #3747: @dependabot-preview[bot] chore(deps): [security] bump express from 2.5.11 to 4.17.1 in /tests/apps/config - #3746: @dependabot-preview[bot] chore(deps): [security] bump express from 2.5.11 to 4.17.1 in /tests/apps/dockerfile-procfile - #3741: @dependabot-preview[bot] chore(deps): [security] bump express from 2.5.11 to 4.17.1 in /tests/apps/nodejs-express - #3783: @dependabot-preview[bot] chore(deps): bump jetty-servlet from 9.4.23.v20191118 to 9.4.24.v20191120 in /tests/apps/java - #3777: @dependabot-preview[bot] chore(deps): [security] bump symfony/http-kernel from 3.4.32 to 3.4.35 in /tests/apps/php - #3774: @dependabot-preview[bot] chore(deps): bump gunicorn from 19.9.0 to 20.0.0 in /tests/apps/python-flask - #3779: @dependabot-preview[bot] chore(deps): bump monolog/monolog from 1.25.1 to 1.25.2 in /tests/apps/php - #3782: @dependabot-preview[bot] chore(deps): bump jetty-servlet from 9.4.22.v20191022 to 9.4.23.v20191118 in /tests/apps/java
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This will reduce the size of binaries in exchange for worse debugging output. This is acceptable for our users and worth it to save money on packagecloud package hosting - which is currently free under a given repository size.